September 24th
| Liberty | 31 | -2.5 | 33.5 | -8.5 | 35 | 47 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +18.5 / -7 | -21.5 / +6 |
| Coastal Carolina | 23 | 50 | 43(1) | | 44 | 40 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | +38 / -7.5 | -36.5 / +13 |
This is the first meeting between the Flames and Chanticleers since Liberty earned a 37-34 win in overtime in the Cure Bowl. Jamey Chadwell was patrolling the Coastal Carolina sidelines in that game, but he is now a resident of Lynchburg where he's hoping to elevate the Flames' program after a handful of disappointing seasons. Both teams are playing with equal rest on a short week, and Coach Chadwell would love to see some consistent play from first-year starting QB Deshawn Purdie, who produced his best effort in a Flames uniform in last week's 51-15 home win over Ball State. Purdie threw for three touchdowns with no interceptions and added 29 more yards on the ground against the Cardinals. Coastal is searching for its first FBS-level win since beating Georgia State on November 8. The Chants are 0-6 straight-up, 2-4 against the spread after last week's narrow loss at Delaware. If you've been following the newsletter for a while, you know our feelings when it comes to Liberty as a big favorite. Since the latter stages of the 2022 season, the Flames have gone 6-16 against the spread as a double-digit favorite with four outright upset losses. With an opening point spread of -2.5, that's not a factor on Thursday night in Conway. Also, Liberty's 20-13 loss at James Madison in the opener is aging pretty well when you consider the Dukes are 3-0 straight-up and against the spread and have out-scored their last two opponents by a combined margin of 113-16. We have no interest in betting the Flames as a big favorite, but in a contest that is essentially lined as a pick'em, Liberty has our attention.
Play Liberty
| Liberty | 29.3 / 19.3 | +10 | 36 | 43 | -12.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Coastal Carolina | 27.7 / 20 | +7.7 | 44 | 41 | -3.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Liberty | 09-19 | Ball State | -14.5 | 49.5 | 51-15 | Coastal Carolina | 09-19 | @ Delaware | +4.5 | 56.5 | 14-22 |
| | 09-12 | Gardner W. | -28.5 | 54.5 | 24-23 | | 09-12 | Fordham | -36.5 | 54 | 45-7 |
| | 09-05 | @ James Mad. | +6 | 51 | 13-20 | | 09-05 | @ West Virg. | +21 | 54.5 | 24-31 |
| Liberty |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ James Madison | 6 | L | 13-20 | UN | 51 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Gardner Webb | -28.5 | L | 24-23 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 14-6 | OV | | | L | 17-20 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Ball State | -14.5 | W | 51-15 | OV | 49.5 | -4.5 | W | 13-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 23-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-24-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-02-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Coastal Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ West Virginia | 21 | W | 24-31 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Fordham | -36.5 | W | 45-7 | UN | 54 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Delaware | 4.5 | L | 14-22 | UN | 56.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | W | 14-15 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-24-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
September 25th
| Army | 21 | -3.5 | 31 | -4 | 31 | 30 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | +26 / - | -20 / - |
| Temple | 24 | 48.5 | 36(1) | | 36 | 36 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +3 / -1 | +5 / +4.5 |
Army has won each of the last four meetings, but Temple comfortably stayed within the number as a 6.5-point road 'dog last season. The Owls' defense was well-prepared for the Knights' attack, holding Army to 250 total yards and 20 first downs. Even though last week's game against Toledo went off the rails a little bit (49-48 in overtime), Temple's rushing defense held the Rockets to 107 yards on 25 carries. That comes one week after holding Penn State to 4.35 yards per carry in the prior contest. Temple has been playing with a two-quarterback system all season thus far. Normal-starter Jaxon Smolik suffered a foot injury in last week's overtime loss to Toledo and did not return. Smolik is expected to return to practice this week and is questionable to play against Army, but Rutgers transfer Ajani Sheppard has taken plenty of snaps this season if Smolik is unable to go. The Owls have covered the spread in each of the first three games, and we'll look to back the cherry-and-white in this one.
Play Temple
09/22 9:52 AM PDT — Temple has been playing with a two-quarterback system all season thus far. Normal-starter Jaxon Smolik suffered a foot injury in last week's overtime loss to Toledo and did not return. Smolik is expected to return to practice this week and is questionable to play against Army, but Rutgers transfer Ajani Sheppard has taken plenty of snaps this season if Smolik is unable to go.
| Army | 41.5 / 15.5 | +26 | 31 | 43 | -20 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Temple | 31.7 / 30 | +1.7 | 36 | 34 | +4.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Army | 09-12 | South Flo. | -3 | 45.5 | 24-28 | Temple | 09-19 | @ Toledo | +4.5 | 48.5 | 48-49 |
| | 09-05 | Bryant | -37 | 51.5 | 59-3 | | 09-12 | Penn State | +24 | 49.5 | 9-27 |
| | | | | | | | 09-05 | Rhode Isl. | -14.5 | 51.5 | 38-14 |
|
| 11-08-25 | Temple | 13 | 45.5 | 16 | 21/111 | 15/25/0/157 | 0/0 |
| Army | 14 | -7 | 20 | 63/224 | 1/3/0/26 | 0/0 |
| Army |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Bryant | -37 | W | 59-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 31-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | South Florida | -3 | L | 24-28 | OV | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 23 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Temple |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Rhode Island | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 10-7 | OV | | | W | 24-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Penn State | 24 | W | 9-27 | UN | 49.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | W | 3-10 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Toledo | 4.5 | W | 48-49 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3 | W | 24-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-25-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Navy | 31 | -6.5 | 31 | -7.5 | 29 | 38 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +27 / -8 | -31.5 / -4.5 |
| UAB | 21 | 50 | 39.5(1) | | 41 | 36 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-0-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | +6 / -13 | -9 / +16.5 |
Navy is coming off a bye, and the Midshipmen are hoping to receive some good news surrounding the injured ankle of starting QB Braxton Woodson. The senior signal caller suffered an ankle injury in the 38-30 loss at Florida Atlantic, eventually handing the reins to Jackson Gutierrez. With no structural damage reported following an MRI, Woodson is considered "week to week" and it's a matter of pain tolerance and how much mobility he can produce on the injured ankle. In games like this when you have a service academy team playing a young/first-time head coach, we always go right to the coaching directory to see what kind of experience they have defending the triple-option. UAB head coach Alex Mortensen is an offensive-minded leader who came from Nick Saban's Alabama coaching tree. It's safe to assume that he doesn't have much experience preparing for the option. Defensive coordinator Todd Grantham worked in the SEC from 2017-2022, then spent two seasons in the NFL as the defensive line coach for the New Orleans Saints. It's safe to assume that he didn’t see many triple-option offenses in either of those leagues. Defensive line coach Sam Mills III arrived in Birmingham after coaching 17 seasons in the NFL. It's safe to assume that he doesn't have any experience against the option. Navy has won the last three meetings by scores of 31-6, 41-18 and 38-24. UAB also lost by 34 and 18 against Army over each of the last two years. So in the last five games against the service academies, the Blazers are 0-5 straight-up, 1-4 against the spread with an average margin of defeat at 22.8 points per game. We respect what Mortensen is building with the Blazers’ program, but Trent Dilfer left them a massive hole to dig out of.
Play Navy
09/22 10:16 AM PDT — Navy is coming off a bye, and the Midshipmen are monitoring the status of starting QB Braxton Woodson. With no structural damage reported to his ankle following an MRI, Woodson is considered "week to week" and it's a matter of pain tolerance and how much mobility he can produce on the injured limb.
| Navy | 36 / 26.5 | +9.5 | 31 | 46 | -18 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| UAB | 21 / 27.7 | -6.7 | 42 | 34 | +8 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-0-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Navy | 09-12 | @ Florida A. | -4.5 | 59.5 | 30-38 | UAB | 09-19 | @ Louisiana | +7 | 55.5 | 14-21 |
| | 09-05 | Towson | -31.5 | 50.5 | 42-15 | | 09-12 | UL Monroe | -9 | 53.5 | 26-20 |
| | | | | | | | 09-03 | @ Illinois | +25.5 | 54 | 23-42 |
|
| 09-06-25 | UAB | 24 | 58.5 | 23 | 27/92 | 23/33/2/321 | 1/1 |
| Navy | 38 | -21 | 20 | 51/295 | 6/8/0/168 | 2/0 |
| 09-28-24 | Navy | 41 | -4.5 | 22 | 42/227 | 9/11/0/225 | 0/0 |
| UAB | 18 | 56.5 | 22 | 43/193 | 14/22/2/202 | 4/0 |
| Navy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Towson | -31.5 | L | 42-15 | OV | 50.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-12 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | -4.5 | L | 30-38 | OV | 59.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | -3 | L | 7-31 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UAB |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:0-3 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:0-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-0-1 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Illinois | 25.5 | W | 23-42 | OV | 54 | 7 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | W | 13-21 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | UL Monroe | -9 | L | 26-20 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13 | -6 | L | 10-17 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Louisiana | 7 | PK | 14-21 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-25-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Samford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Northwestern | 20 | 49.5 | 19.5 | | 21 | 24 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | +25 / - | -9 / - |
| Indiana | 38 | -20.5 | 5.5(2) | -16 | 5 | 42 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | +43 / - | -47.5 / - |
Indiana has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings, but these regional foes have only met one time in the last six seasons - A 41-24 Hoosiers win in October 2024. Western Kentucky threw Curt Cignetti quite the curveball last week as the Hilltoppers essentially waved the white flag from the opening kickoff. WKU was a top-35 team in pace last season, averaging under 25 seconds in between plays. The Hilltoppers made it very clear that they simply wanted to get out of Bloomington in one piece last week. After running 82 plays against Nevada in the opener, the Hilltoppers only ran 61 plays last week against the Hoosiers and benched starting QB Rodney Tisdale Jr. so that he could get healthy before the start of C-USA play. With Indiana's defense remaining untested through three weeks, we're inclined to look toward the over in this contest. The hiring of Chip Kelly raised some eyebrows in Evanston, but the Purple 'Cats have produced 75 points in their first two games against solid competition. Veteran QB Aidan Chiles went 17-of-22 for 241 yards with three touchdowns and no interceptions in last week's demolition of Colorado. After jumping out to a 21-0 lead at halftime, Kelly was probably able to put a few things away in his back pocket for this contest against the Hoosiers. Cignetti is generally prepared for every one and every thing thrown his way, but an OC like Kelly always has a wrinkle or two up his sleeve.
Play the Over
| Northwestern | 37.5 / 12.5 | +25 | 22 | 40 | -9 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 |
| Indiana | 48.3 / 5.3 | +43 | 4 | 45 | -47.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Northwestern | 09-19 | Colorado | -3.5 | 48 | 41-7 | Indiana | 09-19 | Western K. | -44.5 | 58 | 38-0 |
| | 09-05 | South Dak. | -14 | 49.5 | 34-18 | | 09-12 | Howard | -58.5 | 68 | 55-0 |
| | | | | | | | 09-05 | North Tex. | -40 | 57.5 | 52-16 |
|
| 10-05-24 | Indiana | 41 | -13 | 27 | 35/149 | 25/33/0/380 | 0/0 |
| Northwestern | 24 | 41 | 17 | 22/93 | 23/38/0/243 | 0/0 |
| Northwestern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-0-1 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | South Dakota St | -14 | W | 34-18 | OV | 49.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 10-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Colorado | -3.5 | W | 41-7 | P | 48 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 21-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-02-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-1-1 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Texas | -40 | L | 52-16 | OV | 57.5 | -10.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -24 | L | 24-6 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Howard | -58.5 | L | 55-0 | UN | 68 | | W | 20-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Western Kentucky | -44.5 | L | 38-0 | UN | 58 | -13.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 14.5 | -26.5 | L | 14-0 | UN | 34.5 |
| 09-25-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/22 9:09 pm |
| Clemson | 19 | -2.5 | 20 | -4 | 18 | 23 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +11.5 / -41 | -11.5 / +10 |
| California | 26 | 52 | 26(2) | | 25 | 55 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +10.5 / +3 | -28 / +4 |
Dabo Swinney got an unlikely assist from Al Roker when a weather delay halted action last Saturday in the fourth quarter just as North Carolina looked like it was about to put away the game at Death Valley. Perhaps the heavens just wanted to tweak Bill Belichick. Whatever, when action resumed nearly three hours later, the Tar Heels couldn’t jam in a TD from the Clemson 7 and the Tigers were in control thereafter. “In control” and “Tigers” have rarely been used together this season, however, especially with freshman QB Tait Reynolds, definitely not yet reminding of past Dabo QBs like Trevor Lawrence in 2018, Cade Klubnik in 2022 or even DJ Uiagalelei during brief work in 2020. Clemson had gone 24-straight drives (excluding kneel-downs) without scoring a TD with Reynolds at the controls until finally breaking through with five minutes left vs. Belichick's Tar Heels. Needless to say, this edition is a far cry from the last Clemson team that Dabo took to the Bay Area almost eight years ago when Lawrence was a freshman and the Tigers walloped Alabama 44-16 in Santa Clara to win the national title. Now, how the mighty have fallen, as Dabo is close to a pick 'em in Berkeley, though the eye test suggests the Bears might be undervalued more than a bit. Cal actually has a functioning offense under new head coach Tosh Lupoi and veteran offensive coordinator Nick Rolovich with sophomore QB Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele one year ahead of Reynolds in the growing pains department. Sagapolutele already has 25 career TD passes (seven of those this season) while the Bears have bounced back smartly from the opening loss to UCLA by winning back-to-back games. JKS has completed better than 70-percent of his throws with five TDs and no picks. On the bright side for Dabo, the trip to NorCal at least gets him temporarily away from the grumbling back home, as the Tigers’ 134th-ranked offense has some members of the IPTAY crowd starting to beat the war drums.
Play Cal
| Clemson | 20 / 26 | -6 | 18 | 23 | -4 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| California | 31.3 / 23.3 | +8 | 25 | 35 | -17.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Clemson | 09-19 | North Car. | -3 | 44.5 | 28-20 | California | 09-19 | Wagner | -58.5 | 65.5 | 49-7 |
| | 09-12 | Georgia S. | -19.5 | 54.5 | 22-7 | | 09-12 | @ Syracuse | +4 | 57 | 21-18 |
| | 09-05 | @ LSU | +10 | 49 | 10-51 | | 09-05 | UCLA | +2.5 | 53.5 | 24-45 |
| Clemson |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ LSU | 10 | L | 10-51 | OV | 49 | 3 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia Southern | -19.5 | L | 22-7 | UN | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11 | L | 16-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | North Carolina | -3 | W | 28-20 | OV | 44.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 7.5 | -1.5 | L | 6-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Charleston Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| California |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UCLA | 2.5 | L | 24-45 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Syracuse | 4 | W | 21-18 | UN | 57 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-12 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Wagner | -58.5 | L | 49-7 | UN | 65.5 | | W | 29-0 | OV | | | W | 39-7 | OV | |
| 09-25-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
September 26th
| UCLA | 38 | -2.5 | 17.5 | -6.5 | 19 | 31 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +16 / +21 | -13.5 / -2.5 |
| Maryland | 29 | 55.5 | 26(2) | | 24 | 18 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | +26.5 / +24 | -21.5 / -11 |
UCLA is making a bit of a habit traveling to College Park as an undefeated team...though, full disclosure, the last time the Bruins made the trip was in 1955 when Red Sanders was the coach and they were actually the top-ranked team in the country (really!). The Terps would avenge a loss the previous year in another high-ranked showdown at the LA Coliseum and win in a monsoon by a 7-0 score and temporarily assume the top spot in the polls (really...again!). My, how 71 years changes things! To the present, and the temperature is starting to get very warm beneath the seat of Maryland head coach Mike Locksley after the Terps' 20-game non-conference win streak was broken last week by James Franklin’s Virginia Tech. Before getting carried away by that 20 number, remember that Locksley’s non-league schedules have been decidedly soft, and this is a Big Ten game anyway - the type Locksley has been losing consistently in recent years as his 15-43 straight-up conference mark since 2018 reminds. As usual, offense doesn’t seem to be the Terps’ problem, especially gunslinger sophomore QB Malik Washington, who has passed for 340+ yards in each of the past two games. Rather, the defense that has leaked consistently vs. Big Ten foes over the years was just exposed again, this time by Hokie QB Ethan Grunkemeyer, who looked like Matthew Stafford when dissecting the Locksley D last week. More trouble could ensue vs. Bob Chesney’s very watchable Bruin attack that finally got QB Nico Iamalleava on the scoresheet last week with three TD passes in the 52-point explosion vs. Purdue. Bruin runners are churning up ground not seen in Westwood since Dick Vermeil’s Rose Bowl Bruins were operating the Veer in 1975, running wild for 379 yards against the Boilermakers as all-purposed deluxe JMU transfer RB Wayne Knight increased his TD haul to eight in three weeks. He and Nico might need to stay busy because the UCLA stop unit let Purdue QB Ryan Browne move rather freely last Saturday, but the Terps never seem to pick on the big boys, or even the semi-big boys like the Bruins. Besides, Maryland couldn’t even beat interim Tim Skipper’s lesser (much lesser) UCLA edition last October in Pasadena.
Play Maryland
09/22 9:28 AM PDT — UCLA wide receiver Mikey Matthews will miss the rest of the regular season with a leg injury.
| UCLA | 41.7 / 24 | +17.7 | 20 | 27 | -10 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Maryland | 42 / 16.3 | +25.7 | 23 | 38 | -18 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| UCLA | 09-19 | Purdue | -13.5 | 53 | 52-38 | Maryland | 09-19 | Virginia . | +2.5 | 53.5 | 26-35 |
| | 09-12 | San Diego. | -13.5 | 53.5 | 28-10 | | 09-12 | @ Connectic. | -11 | 52.5 | 38-14 |
| | 09-05 | @ California | -2.5 | 53.5 | 45-24 | | 09-05 | Hampton | -45.5 | 56.5 | 62-0 |
|
| 10-18-25 | Maryland | 17 | 52.5 | 17 | 26/127 | 23/48/1/210 | 1/1 |
| UCLA | 20 | -4 | 21 | 35/193 | 21/35/2/221 | 1/1 |
| UCLA |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ California | -2.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 24-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | San Diego State | -13.5 | W | 28-10 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Purdue | -13.5 | W | 52-38 | OV | 53 | -4.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Maryland |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Hampton | -45.5 | W | 62-0 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 17-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Connecticut | -11 | W | 38-14 | UN | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -7 | W | 17-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Virginia Tech | 2.5 | L | 26-35 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 0.5 | L | 14-27 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana | 34 | -9 | 36 | -15 | 37 | 42 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-0-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | +19 / -19 | -14 / +30.5 |
| Charlotte | 20 | 49 | 52(1) | | 51 | 39 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 | -2 / -18.5 | -20.5 / +30.5 |
The losing streak continues. Charlotte put up a good fight last week in rain-soaked Boone against App State, but the 49ers have now lost 12-straight games including one as a three-touchdown favorite against The Citadel in this year's opener. Charlotte has covered the number in back-to-back games as a big 'dog, but in our opinion, the situation played a heavy factor in each of those results. The first cover was against Ole Miss as a 44.5-point 'dog when the Rebels were clearly disinterested and ready to turn the page toward LSU. The second cover was last week's 26-21 loss to the Mountaineers in a game that was delayed by 3.5 hours and ended at 12:32am ET. Needless to say, we're not rushing to upgrade the 49ers' power rating any time soon. Louisiana has covered the number in each of its first three games this season. Last week's 21-14 final score against UAB was probably a little flattering for the Blazers after the Ragin' Cajuns out-gained UAB by 117 yards with a 21-11 edge in first downs. UAB's only touchdown through the first 51 minutes came off a fumble return in the end zone. We have this game lined closer to -14 with minimal home field advantage for the Niners. And like we mentioned, Charlotte essentially lost a full day of prep and recovery after playing a road game late into the night last week.
Play Louisiana
| Louisiana | 29.7 / 23.3 | +6.3 | 37 | 36 | +1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-0-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Charlotte | 23.7 / 36.7 | -13 | 51 | 34 | +13.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Louisiana | 09-19 | UAB | -7 | 55.5 | 21-14 | Charlotte | 09-19 | @ Appalachi. | +16.5 | 52.5 | 21-26 |
| | 09-12 | @ USC | +30.5 | 59 | 30-49 | | 09-12 | @ Mississip. | +44 | 59.5 | 9-41 |
| | 09-05 | Lamar | -20.5 | 48.5 | 38-7 | | 09-05 | Citadel | -20.5 | 49 | 41-43 |
| Louisiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lamar | -20.5 | W | 38-7 | UN | 48.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ USC | 30.5 | W | 30-49 | OV | 59 | 7.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 18.5 | W | 10-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UAB | -7 | PK | 21-14 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Charlotte |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-3 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Citadel | -20.5 | L | 41-43 | OV | 49 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Mississippi | 44 | W | 9-41 | UN | 59.5 | 13.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14.5 | 27.5 | W | 0-27 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Appalachian St | 16.5 | W | 21-26 | UN | 52.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-13 | UN | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/22 9:09 pm |
| Nebraska | 24 | -5.5 | 14.5 | -6.5 | 16 | 55 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | +34.7 / - | -27.5 / - |
| Michigan State | 20 | 49 | 23(2) | | 23 | 3 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-0-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +19 / -17 | -14 / +29 |
"I’m not dumb. I can tell when they’re good." Nebraska head coach Matt Rhule is usually good for a couple soundbytes during the season, and he was in one of those moods on Monday. Without trying to throw too much shade on his previous teams led by now-Oregon backup QB Dylan Raiola, you can tell Rhule has a little more pep in his step when traveling through Lincoln this fall. Rhule said that he's known since January that this season was going to be different for Big Red, and so-far-so-good. That same sentiment can be felt in East Lansing after Pat Fitzgerald's new team put a legitimate scare into Notre Dame last week. The Spartans comfortably stayed within the number as a four-touchdown 'dog in South Bend, and now have an opportunity to make a statement in front of the green-and-white faithful. The home team has won each of the last six meetings in this Big Ten battle, and the 'dog has covered the spread in five of those contests with three outright upset victories. We're not ready to call for the outright upset in this one, but we are prepared to look at the total. The Spartans' first three games this season have seen an average of 43.0 points per game, and Fitzgerald simply knows how to play clean football. Michigan State is averaging 3.3 penalties per game thus far. Spartans' opponents have converted 33.3-percent on third down, and Michigan State's special teams have not allowed a single punt return through three games (all 11 punts were either downed, fair caught or went out of bounds). Fitzgerald knows how to limit mistakes, and if that means playing a slow, boring brand of football for a little while, then so be it.
Play the Under
| Nebraska | 46.3 / 11.7 | +34.7 | 17 | 47 | -27.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| Michigan State | 25 / 18 | +7 | 23 | 28 | +0.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-0-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Nebraska | 09-19 | North Dak. | -27.5 | 56.5 | 34-7 | Michigan State | 09-19 | @ Notre Dame | +29 | 51.5 | 10-27 |
| | 09-12 | Bowling G. | -31 | 49 | 56-7 | | 09-12 | Eastern M. | -17.5 | 49.5 | 35-7 |
| | 09-05 | Ohio | -23.5 | 47.5 | 49-21 | | 09-04 | Toledo | -10 | 48.5 | 30-20 |
|
| 10-04-25 | Michigan State | 27 | 48.5 | 17 | 38/84 | 15/30/2/156 | 1/1 |
| Nebraska | 38 | -12.5 | 15 | 31/67 | 16/24/1/194 | 1/0 |
| Nebraska |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Ohio | -23.5 | W | 49-21 | OV | 47.5 | -7 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10 | -13.5 | L | 14-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Bowling Green | -31 | W | 56-7 | OV | 49 | -7 | W | 14-0 | OV | 11.5 | -17.5 | W | 35-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Dakota | -27.5 | L | 34-7 | UN | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 17-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-2-1 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Toledo | -10 | PK | 30-20 | OV | 48.5 | -3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -6.5 | W | 19-7 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Eastern Michigan | -17.5 | W | 35-7 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 26 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Notre Dame | 29 | W | 10-27 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 17.5 | W | 10-17 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/22 9:09 pm |
| Connecticut | 27 | 52.5 | 40 | | 41 | 47 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +12.5 / +28 | -5.5 / -3.5 |
| Miami Ohio | 24 | -2.5 | 36(1) | -5 | 35 | 26 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | +38 / -24.5 | -30.5 / +15.5 |
For all intents and purposes, this is a modified MAC reunion as former Toledo head coach Jason Candle returns to visit a former foe. Toledo and Miami (Oh) played four times over the previous three seasons with the Rockets winning all three of the regular season contests, but the RedHawks won the one that mattered the most with a win in the MAC Championship Game in 2023. Miami returns home after a back-breaking loss to Cincinnati last week as the RedHawks blew a 28-7 lead. Miami still had a double-digit lead midway through the fourth quarter before the Bearcats found the end zone twice in the final minutes. Veteran head coach Chuck Martin usually has a good pulse on his team's motivation so we're not too worried about a let-down spot from a mental aspect, but the RedHawks' defense has gotten beat up through three games. Cincinnati's offense ran 20 more plays (76-56) against the RedHawks' defense, and Pitt nearly did the same in Week 1 (75-58). UConn is coming off a comfortable four-touchdown win at Southern Miss, which was never in doubt after the Eagles lost starting QB Ethan Hampton to injury. The Huskies' offense controlled the ball for over 34 minutes. We don't LOVE the fact that UConn is on the second leg of back-to-back road games, but given how much attrition the RedHawks have faced thus far, we can only look in the Huskies' direction. For context, Toledo closed as a 5.5-point road favorite at Miami in mid-November last season and the Rockets won 24-3. Now, at a new program in UConn that is willing to spend a little bit of money, Candle is a four-point 'dog in Oxford. We're struggling to get on board with that one, even if our power ratings say it's directionally correct.
Play UConn
| Connecticut | 39.3 / 21.7 | +17.7 | 42 | 42 | -4.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Miami Ohio | 30 / 33.7 | -3.7 | 35 | 33 | 0 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Connecticut | 09-19 | @ So Missis. | -3.5 | 54.5 | 48-20 | Miami Ohio | 09-19 | @ Cincinnat. | +14.5 | 51 | 31-35 |
| | 09-12 | Maryland | +11 | 52.5 | 14-38 | | 09-12 | Holy Cross | -30.5 | 47 | 45-7 |
| | 09-05 | Lafayette | -21.5 | 51.5 | 56-7 | | 09-05 | @ Pittsburg. | +16.5 | 48 | 14-59 |
| Connecticut |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lafayette | -21.5 | W | 56-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Maryland | 11 | L | 14-38 | UN | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 7 | L | 7-17 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ So Mississippi | -3.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 54.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 27-6 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miami Ohio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 16.5 | L | 14-59 | OV | 48 | 3.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 10 | 9.5 | L | 14-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Holy Cross | -30.5 | W | 45-7 | OV | 47 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Cincinnati U | 14.5 | W | 31-35 | OV | 51 | 3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10 | 7.5 | W | 28-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Appalachian St | 23 | 56 | 38.5 | | 40 | 52 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +28.5 / +3 | -19 / +6.5 |
| NC State | 31 | -13 | 23(2) | -17.5 | 21 | 17 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +73 / -15 | -33.5 / +3.5 |
You just heard us mention "letdown spot" in the last game involving Miami (Oh), but there's no greater letdown spot on this week's slate than the Wolfpack from Raleigh. As a 3.5-point road 'dog at Vanderbilt, NC State was covering the spread for 59 minutes and 59 seconds before veteran quarterback CJ Bailey committed one of the worst mistakes in recent memory. Bailey's fumble in the end zone while trying to take an intentional safety was bad enough, but the officials adding one second to the clock (forcing Vanderbilt to kick the extra point to win by four, not three) was the sour cherry on top. Bailey and head coach Dave Doeren will be answering questions about that play all week, and the last thing you want to see on your schedule when you're licking your wounds is a motivated in-state little brother playing with a lot of confidence. App State already upset one Tar Heel State foe (East Carolina as a 6.5-point 'dog in Week 2), and we wouldn't be shocked if this game went down to the wire. The Mountaineers are coming off a somewhat-sloppy effort against Charlotte, but that game was delayed by 3.5 hours and App State was never in significant danger. The Mountaineers will likely struggle to run against NC State's impressive d-line, but veteran QB Malachi Singleton has played plenty of football and won't be intimidated by the bright lights of an ACC stage. If this game is closer-than-expected in the second half, Carter-Finley Stadium might turn into a hostile atmosphere for the home team. Our power ratings suggest NC State should be a larger favorite in this matchup, but the Wolfpack have a long way to go before they win our trust.
Play App State
| Appalachian St | 36 / 16 | +20 | 40 | 46 | -10.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| NC State | 37.3 / 23 | +14.3 | 21 | 30 | -9 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Appalachian St | 09-19 | Charlotte | -16.5 | 52.5 | 26-21 | NC State | 09-19 | @ Vanderbilt | +3 | 50.5 | 31-35 |
| | 09-12 | @ East Caro. | +6.5 | 55.5 | 27-24 | | 09-11 | Richmond | -33.5 | 50.5 | 73-0 |
| | 09-05 | Maine | -21 | 53.5 | 55-3 | | 08-29 | @ Virginia | +4 | 50.5 | 8-34 |
| Appalachian St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Maine | -21 | W | 55-3 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ East Carolina | 6.5 | W | 27-24 | UN | 55.5 | 3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13 | 4 | W | 17-10 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Charlotte | -16.5 | L | 26-21 | UN | 52.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -9.5 | L | 13-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| NC State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-0-1 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Virginia | 4 | L | 8-34 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 2.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Richmond | -33.5 | W | 73-0 | OV | 50.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 49-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 3 | L | 31-35 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wake Forest | 27 | 57.5 | 21 | | 22 | 5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +4.5 / +2 | -4 / -2.5 |
| Louisville | 38 | -11 | 15.5(2) | -7.5 | 15 | 14 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | +28 / - | -21 / - |
We were on the over in Wake Forest's game against Miami (Fla) last week. NC State's gaffe against Vanderbilt will certainly take the top spot on Scott Van Pelt's "Bad Beats" segment, but the Deacs' game against the 'Canes deserves honorable mention. Four of the first five possessions resulted in touchdowns and we were sitting at 51 points at the beginning of the fourth quarter with a total of 55 in-pocket. Neither team scored over the game's final nine possessions. Miami missed a field goal and Wake Forest turned the ball over at the Canes' 14 and 4-yard-lines in the fourth quarter. That one hurt a little bit, but we're prepared to go back to the well. Even with that annoying result against Miami, we still like what we've seen from Wake Forest's offense in all three games this season - all against FBS-level competition including two Power 4 teams. The Deacs are generating 6.59 yards per play and Gio Lopez continues to look comfortable in his new ACC surroundings. On the other side, the Cardinals are coming off a big win over SMU to put Louisville in the "team most-likely to face Miami in the ACC Championship Game" driver's seat. Running back Keyjuan Brown had ten carries for 163 yards and two touchdowns. Ohio State transfer Lincoln Kienholz continues to impress, throwing for two touchdowns against the Mustangs and adding another one with his legs. These teams haven't met since 2022 so there's not much to learn from past results, but each of the last six meetings have gone over the total and those games have seen an average of 82.0 points per game. Defense has traditionally been optional when the Cards and Demon Deacons get together in ACC play.
Play the Over
| Wake Forest | 32 / 28.3 | +3.7 | 24 | 28 | -3.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Louisville | 46 / 28.3 | +17.7 | 15 | 26 | -12 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Wake Forest | 09-18 | Miami Flo. | +20 | 55.5 | 20-33 | Louisville | 09-19 | SMU | -3 | 57.5 | 41-31 |
| | 09-12 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | 51.5 | 38-36 | | 09-11 | Villanova | -39 | 56.5 | 59-13 |
| | 09-03 | Akron | -28 | 50.5 | 38-16 | | 09-06 | @ Mississip. | +6.5 | 54.5 | 38-41 |
| Wake Forest |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Akron | -28 | L | 38-16 | OV | 50.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -16.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | L | 38-36 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -1 | W | 17-10 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-18-26 | Miami Florida | 20 | W | 20-33 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 11 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Merrimack College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisville |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Mississippi | 6.5 | W | 38-41 | OV | 54.5 | 3 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | 4 | PK | 6-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Villanova | -39 | W | 59-13 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 17-3 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-10 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | SMU | -3 | W | 41-31 | OV | 57.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Florida | 45 | -17.5 | 32 | -13.5 | 30 | 55 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +26 / +4 | -26 / +3 |
| Bowling Green | 17 | 49 | 46.5(1) | | 47 | 27 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 | -7 / -48.5 | -1.5 / +27 |
So, Eddie George, how are you enjoying FBS-level football? After showing some signs of optimism in his first season at Bowling Green, the Falcons now look like a bottom-5 program in the country. Bowling Green is 0-3 straight-up and against the spread, including a loss to FCS-level Tarleton State. The Falcons return home after getting beat 56-7 at Nebraska and 55-7 at Iowa State over the last two weeks. South Florida is playing with some confidence after a 3-0 start. That 19-9 win over Florida International looked a little shaky at the time, but the Panthers smashed Buffalo and coulda-shoulda-woulda beat Florida Atlantic last week, out-gaining the Owls by 99 yards with a 21-17 edge in first downs. So that Week 1 win, even though it wasn't pretty, has aged fairly well for the Bulls under first-year head coach Brian Hartline. Don't forget, Hartline was born in Canton, went to GlenOak High School, played at Ohio State, and prior to leaving for Tampa, Ohio State was the only place where Hartline coached before this year. So this trip back to Ohio will certainly mean something for the Bulls' leader. When South Florida's schedule was released, we're guessing not too many of the players were excited about a late-September trip from South Florida to suburban Ohio, but we have a feeling Hartline will change that. Even though the Falcons are the home team, we imagine the Buckeye State hero will have plenty of support.
Play South Florida
| South Florida | 35.3 / 16.7 | +18.7 | 30 | 43 | -16.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Bowling Green | 9 / 43.7 | -34.7 | 45 | 33 | +17.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| South Florida | 09-19 | Delaware . | -37.5 | 60 | 59-17 | Bowling Green | 09-19 | @ Iowa State | +22.5 | 43.5 | 7-55 |
| | 09-12 | @ Army | +3 | 45.5 | 28-24 | | 09-12 | @ Nebraska | +31 | 49 | 7-56 |
| | 09-05 | Florida I. | -14.5 | 53.5 | 19-9 | | 09-05 | Tarleton . | -1.5 | 49.5 | 13-20 |
| South Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Florida Intl | -14.5 | L | 19-9 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 6-0 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Army | 3 | W | 28-24 | OV | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 23 |
| 09-19-26 | Delaware State | -37.5 | W | 59-17 | OV | 60 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 28-17 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bowling Green |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-3 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-3 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:0-3 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tarleton State | -1.5 | L | 13-20 | UN | 49.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | L | 7-17 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Nebraska | 31 | L | 7-56 | OV | 49 | 7 | L | 0-14 | OV | 11.5 | 17.5 | L | 0-35 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Iowa State | 22.5 | L | 7-55 | OV | 43.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | L | 7-35 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas | 24 | -5 | 4 | -4.5 | 4 | 28 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | +25.7 / - | -20.5 / - |
| Tennessee U | 20 | 54.5 | 11.5(3) | | 12 | 43 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | +40 / +21 | -42.5 / -12.5 |
This will be the first meeting between the Volunteers and Longhorns since the 1968 Cotton Bowl, which Texas won 36-13. Arch Manning's critics have been saying it for years, and it's getting harder and harder to prove them wrong. After every data point that we get, Manning simply looks like a J.A.G. No, not a Jacksonville Jaguar in next year's draft. J.A.G. - Just a guy. Are we ever going to see the highlights of a player that has been projected to be a top NFL draft choice since he was a junior in high school? Manning went 16-of-32 (50.0-percent) for 161 passing yards with two touchdowns and no interceptions in last week's ho-hum win over UTSA. Over his last two seasons in Austin, Manning is completing 61.4-percent of his passes. His yards-per-attempt have dropped from 7.8 last year to 6.9 this year. After scoring ten touchdowns on the ground last year, Manning doesn't have any so far in 2026. His yards-per-carry have dropped from 4.3 last year to 4.0 this year. His passer rating of 139.3 sits behind heavily-criticized quarterbacks like Michigan's Bryce Underwood and Florida State's Ashton Daniels. Perhaps we're being a little harsh on Manning, but he's largely looked like an average Power Four quarterback over the first three weeks of the season. It appears that new Vols' defensive coordinator Jim Knowles learned some lessons during a failed trip to Happy Valley, because Tennessee's defense appears to be learning his scheme a little faster than the Nittany Lions did last year. Tennessee's defense has allowed a total of three touchdowns in the first three games. Freshman QB Faizon Brandon has looked solid thus far, but this will be his first major test and you have to assume that there will be a "let's get some comfortable, easy throws" phase in the first quarter of this game. We can only look toward the under in this contest, and we'll borrow some of the same numbers that we used in Week 2 when the Longhorns played Ohio State. Over the last two seasons, Texas has played the Buckeyes twice, plus marquee games against Oklahoma, Georgia and Texas A&M. All five of those games stayed under their respective totals and those five contests saw an average of 37.2 points per game.
Play the Under
| Texas | 37.7 / 12 | +25.7 | 4 | 21 | -20.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Tennessee U | 47.7 / 14 | +33.7 | 12 | 40 | -32.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Texas | 09-19 | Tex San A. | -30 | 58.5 | 30-6 | Tennessee U | 09-19 | Kennesaw . | -35 | 60 | 42-9 |
| | 09-12 | Ohio State | -2 | 50.5 | 24-23 | | 09-12 | @ Georgia T. | -12.5 | 55.5 | 45-24 |
| | 09-05 | Texas Sta. | -29.5 | 61.5 | 59-7 | | 09-05 | Furman | -49.5 | 66.5 | 56-9 |
| Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-1-1 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Texas State | -29.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 61.5 | -7.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -17.5 | W | 28-7 | OV | 33 |
| 09-12-26 | Ohio State | -2 | L | 24-23 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tex San Antonio | -30 | L | 30-6 | UN | 58.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18 | L | 20-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tennessee U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Furman | -49.5 | L | 56-9 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Georgia Tech | -12.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 55.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13 | -6.5 | W | 24-10 | OV | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Kennesaw State | -35 | L | 42-9 | UN | 60 | -9.5 | W | 15-3 | OV | 14.5 | -21.5 | L | 21-3 | UN | 34 |
| 09-26-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa | 17 | 40 | 16 | | 16 | 55 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | +32.7 / - | -27.5 / - |
| Michigan | 26 | -4.5 | 13(3) | -6 | 12 | 47 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | +14.3 / - | -19 / - |
Michigan has won-and-covered each of the last four meetings, with the last one being a 26-0 Wolverine shut-out in the 2023 Big Ten Championship Game. Five of the last six meetings have stayed under the total as the Hawkeyes have scored an average of 9.7 points per game during that run. After ending last season on a three-game winning streak, Iowa has won six-in-a-row with a pair of early-season shut-outs thus far. The maize-and-blue are also unbeaten, but their path has featured plenty of uphill battles. After narrowly escaping Western Michigan and Oklahoma, Michigan was tied with UTEP at the end of the second quarter before the Wolverines ended the game on a 45-3 run. Even though the coaching staff has changed on the Ann Arbor sidelines, the recent history in this series is hard to ignore. The Wolverines are one of the few teams in the country that can simply out-Iowa Iowa. Everything that Kirk Ferentz wants to do in terms of field position and the line of scrimmage, Michigan has traditionally done just a little bit better. Also, the Hawkeyes have some lingering injury questions. Tight end DJ Vonnahme and running backs Kamari Moulton and LJ Phillips have all missed time and Ferentz is hopeful to get them back this week in some capacity. Laying points with Michigan in a matchup like this is rarely enjoyable, but we can only look in the Wolverines' direction.
Play Michigan
| Iowa | 37 / 4.3 | +32.7 | 16 | 43 | -27.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Michigan | 27.3 / 13 | +14.3 | 12 | 30 | -19 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Iowa | 09-19 | Northern . | -37.5 | 48.5 | 55-0 | Michigan | 09-19 | UTEP | -34.5 | 48.5 | 52-17 |
| | 09-12 | Iowa State | -14 | 42.5 | 16-13 | | 09-12 | Oklahoma | +5 | 43.5 | 17-10 |
| | 09-05 | No Illino. | -31 | 44.5 | 40-0 | | 09-05 | Western M. | -27.5 | 50.5 | 13-12 |
| Iowa |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | No Illinois | -31 | W | 40-0 | UN | 44.5 | -7.5 | W | 20-0 | OV | 10 | -18.5 | W | 33-0 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Iowa State | -14 | L | 16-13 | UN | 42.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Northern Iowa | -37.5 | W | 55-0 | OV | 48.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Michigan | -27.5 | L | 13-12 | UN | 50.5 | -7 | L | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -16.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Oklahoma | 5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 10-0 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UTEP | -34.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 48.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -20 | L | 17-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UNLV | 25 | -13 | 30 | -22 | 28 | 36 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 | -6 / -11.5 | -4.5 / -2.5 |
| Akron | 20 | 53 | 53(1) | | 51 | 22 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +35 / -28 | -26.5 / +25.5 |
Being a diehard Pittsburgh Pirates supporter, Joe Moorhead knows all about bad luck, so perhaps he isn’t surprised if that’s the only sort of luck he seems to be having lately with his Akron side. The latest Moorhead misfortune is that after looking like his Zips might have uncovered a stealth weapon and perhaps their gridiron version of Paul Skenes in skittish freshman QB Cibastian Broughton, who was completing better than 80-percent of his passes (mostly short, but accurate, throws) while forcing Wake Forest, Robert Morris and Minnesota defenders to get tired while chasing him all over the field. Broughton injured a knee vs. the Golden Gophers, forcing less-dynamic sophomore Brayden Roggow to be thrown into the deep end in Minneapolis, with predictable results in a 41-7 loss. With no word yet if Mr. Excitement Broughton - also Moorhead's leading rusher - will be ready for this visit of UNLV, we proceed assuming he’s unavailable until further notice. Note the Rebels made one of these trips to MAC country last season and won across the state at Miami-O, but that was with Anthony Colandrea (now working some magic at Nebraska) pulling the strings for the offense. Now it’s Jackson Arnold, who is reminding Dan Mullen why Oklahoma and Auburn gave up on him in recent years: Too quick to take sacks (already 11 this term after a whopping 64 the past two years with the Sooners and Tigers) and making too few big plays, with only two TD passes in three games, As ex-Michigan transfer Alex Orgi can’t throw, Mullen doesn’t really have another alternative at QB unless he wants to switch to a Troy Calhoun-like Air Force option with Orgi at the controls. The recent blowout loss at North Texas also exposed several holes in the Rebel defense, and this looks a far cry from recent UNLV editions for Mullen and Barry Odom that were in the conversation for the playoff bid from the Group of 6, as the 1-2 Rebs have already had to adjust their aim to the New Mexico or Famous Idaho Potato Bowls. Even if Moorhead's best option at QB might be out, or limited, do we really want to lay double digits with Mullen’s team that just lost 44-6 at North Texas two weeks ago?
Play the Under
| UNLV | 16 / 25.7 | -9.7 | 25 | 32 | -3 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Akron | 22.7 / 29.7 | -7 | 51 | 33 | +8 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| UNLV | 09-12 | @ North Tex. | -3 | 58.5 | 6-44 | Akron | 09-19 | @ Minnesota. | +22.5 | 48.5 | 7-41 |
| | 09-05 | @ Hawaii | -1.5 | 55 | 21-6 | | 09-12 | Robert Mo. | -26.5 | 45.5 | 45-10 |
| | 08-29 | Memphis | -4.5 | 55.5 | 21-27 | | 09-03 | @ Wake Fore. | +28 | 50.5 | 16-38 |
| UNLV |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-2-1 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Memphis | -4.5 | L | 21-27 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13 | -3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Hawaii | -1.5 | W | 21-6 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ North Texas | -3 | L | 6-44 | UN | 58.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-13 | P | 13 | -1.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Akron |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | 28 | W | 16-38 | OV | 50.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Robert Morris | -26.5 | W | 45-10 | OV | 45.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Minnesota U | 22.5 | L | 7-41 | UN | 48.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Alabama | 17 | 54.5 | 41.5 | | 42 | 41 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +15 / -4 | -10.5 / +10 |
| Kentucky | 38 | -20.5 | 18.5(2) | -25 | 20 | 9 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +2 / +10 | -7 / +17 |
Big Blue Nation is riding high after Kentucky dominated former-top-10 Texas A&M last week at Kyle Field. The Wildcats enjoyed a +2.6 yards per play advantage over the Aggies, and frankly, that 31-21 final score is a little flattering for A&M after they scored a late touchdown in garbage time. Things are looking up for first-year head coach Will Stein, and in reality, he is 15 minutes away from being arguably the best story in college football this season. Kentucky led Alabama with under five minutes to go in the third quarter before the wheels completely fell off and the Crimson Tide scored the game's final 32 points. If Mother Nature doesn't play a little havoc in that Week 2 game, Stein may be looking at a 2-0 start in the SEC with wins over Alabama and A&M. South Alabama earned a 41-36 home win over Ohio last week, but starting QB Bishop Davenport did not play and there was essentially no warning given before his absence. Head coach Major Applewhite said it was precautionary to help him rest some lingering bumps and bruises. That gives us some major pause when looking at this game. At full strength for a full 60 minutes, South Alabama would have our attention. But the Jaguars have a quirky stretch ahead with two games in six days, including travel to Arkansas State for a Thursday night game. Based on how he treated last week's game against the Bobcats, Applewhite clearly has an eye looking ahead toward Sun Belt play. If Kentucky takes an early lead, will Davenport sit once again? His presence makes a big difference for the Jaguars.
| South Alabama | 34.7 / 26 | +8.7 | 43 | 43 | -3.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Kentucky | 31 / 26.3 | +4.7 | 21 | 24 | +1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| South Alabama | 09-19 | Ohio | -7 | 49.5 | 41-36 | Kentucky | 09-19 | @ Texas A&M | +17 | 48.5 | 31-21 |
| | 09-12 | @ Tulane | +10 | 48 | 24-28 | | 09-12 | Alabama | +9 | 47.5 | 17-45 |
| | 09-05 | SE Louisi. | -13.5 | 54 | 39-14 | | 09-05 | Youngstow. | -22.5 | 61.5 | 45-13 |
| South Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-0-1 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-0-1 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Louisiana | -13.5 | W | 39-14 | UN | 54 | | W | 19-7 | OV | | | W | 22-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Tulane | 10 | W | 24-28 | OV | 48 | 3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | 6.5 | W | 10-14 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | Ohio | -7 | L | 41-36 | OV | 49.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kentucky |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Youngstown St | -22.5 | W | 45-13 | UN | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama | 9 | L | 17-45 | OV | 47.5 | 3 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 5.5 | W | 17-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas A&M | 17 | W | 31-21 | OV | 48.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| James Madison | 23 | -7 | 26 | -12 | 27 | 27 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +45.5 / +13 | -26.5 / +3 |
| Old Dominion | 16 | 44 | 39(1) | | 37 | 35 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 | +9 / -23 | -22 / +18 |
James Madison is 4-0 straight-up, 3-1 against the spread in this regional rivalry since joining the Sun Belt in 2022. The Dukes earned a 63-27 home win as a small 2.5-point favorite over the Monarchs last season. JMU out-gained ODU 624-285 in that contest, which Old Dominion was actually leading at the two-minute warning at the end of the first half. The Monarchs led 27-21 before getting out-scored 42-0 over the final 32 minutes. James Madison QB JC Evans is questionable to return after missing the last two weeks with a wrist injury. Dukes head coach Billy Napier had this game circled for Evans' return, but he remains limited in practice this week. The Dukes' defense picked up any offensive slack over the last two weeks, holding Wagner and San Diego State to a combined 16 points. A wave of early money has shown on the under in this contest, and it's hard to disagree with. Dating back to last October, the under is 8-1 in Old Dominion's last nine games. The only "over" result during that stretch was the Week 2 clash against Virginia Tech, which saw a lot more points than it should have. Virginia Tech only generated 4.8 yards per play against the Monarchs' defense, but that game featured five lost fumbles including one that was returned for a touchdown. Games that feature a total of 726 yards and 37 first downs typically do not see 65 points scored. As long as we don't see another circus in this one, both defenses are equipped to limit what the opposing offense wants to do.
Play the Under
09/22 9:29 AM PDT — James Madison QB JC Evans is questionable to return after missing the last two weeks with a wrist injury. Dukes head coach Billy Napier had this game circled for Evans' return, but he remains limited in practice this week.
| James Madison | 44.3 / 9.7 | +34.7 | 28 | 39 | -16.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Old Dominion | 23 / 24.7 | -1.7 | 36 | 36 | -8.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| James Madison | 09-19 | @ San Diego. | +3 | 46.5 | 26-13 | Old Dominion | 09-19 | East Caro. | -2.5 | 49 | 17-20 |
| | 09-12 | Wagner | -46.5 | 56.5 | 87-3 | | 09-12 | @ Virginia . | +18 | 47.5 | 21-44 |
| | 09-05 | Liberty | -6 | 51 | 20-13 | | 09-05 | Norfolk St | -41.5 | 52.5 | 31-10 |
|
| 10-18-25 | Old Dominion | 27 | 47.5 | 13 | 29/76 | 13/21/2/209 | 2/1 |
| James Madison | 63 | -3 | 27 | 53/311 | 18/26/0/313 | 1/1 |
| 11-16-24 | James Madison | 35 | -1 | 23 | 46/239 | 18/26/0/192 | 1/0 |
| Old Dominion | 32 | 51 | 15 | 37/174 | 9/21/1/189 | 0/0 |
| James Madison |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Liberty | -6 | W | 20-13 | UN | 51 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wagner | -46.5 | W | 87-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 42-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Diego State | 3 | W | 26-13 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 19-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Old Dominion |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Norfolk St | -41.5 | L | 31-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 18 | L | 21-44 | OV | 47.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | L | 6-34 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | East Carolina | -2.5 | L | 17-20 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Diego State | 17 | 50.5 | 34 | | 30 | 27 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +10 / -18 | -21 / +13.5 |
| Toledo | 24 | -2.5 | 34.5(1) | -0.5 | 36 | 36 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | +27 / -10 | -20.5 / +10 |
Maybe the Pac-12 thought it was inviting the old Air Coryell version of San Diego State into the league. Whatever, the Aztec offense doesn’t move the needle the same way these days, as the supposed upgrades in the passing game behind scatter-armed ex-Michigan transfer Jayden Denegal (just four TD passes and four picks through the first three games) remain mostly illusory after SDSU was handcuffed again last week at Snapdragon by James Madison the week after barely registering at UCLA. Lately, ranking down by Navy and Rice at 133rd nationally in passing (as the Aztecs currently do) seems the new normal on Montezuma Mesa, where it comes as a bit of a surprise as third-year head coach Sean Lewis forged his reputation a few years ago at Kent State with avant-garde attacks. Thus we find it hard to forecast SDSU firing most of the scoring shots at the Glass Bowl, where Toledo looks bound for another season of MAC contention and a usual bowl berth. Indeed, conversations about the Rockets at the local Tony Packo’s eateries are a bit ebullient after new head coach Mike Jacobs seems to have brought his high-powered attack with him from Mercer, where the Bears finished third in FCS offense a year ago. Several skill players from the SoCon have accompanied Jacobs, including big-play wideout Adjatay Dabbs who already sits on 16 catches with three TDs and proving a favorite target of QB John Alan Richter. The Toledo holdover is proving a surprisingly good fit as pilot of the Jacobs offense as indicated by his nine TD throws through three weeks. Jacobs’ Toledo also passed the character test last Saturday vs. KC Keeler’s capable Temple side by rallying for a pair of TDs in the last minute to force OT before scuttling an Owls two-point conversion try to give the Rockets a thrilling win. Earlier, staying within earshot vs. Pat Fitzgerald’s much-improved Michigan State in the opener suggested that the Rockets have withstood the departure of long-serving head coach Jason Candle (to UConn) and can likely stay at or near the same level with Jacobs. Meanwhile, still without a credible passing game, we’re not sure what level the Aztecs are really at these days. From a power ratings' perspective, we're struggling to justify this price on the rockets. But given the travel situation and Denegal's performance thus far, we can only look in Toledo's direction.
Play Toledo
| San Diego State | 25.3 / 24.7 | +0.7 | 27 | 34 | -9.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Toledo | 44 / 29.3 | +14.7 | 36 | 38 | -10.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| San Diego State | 09-19 | James Mad. | -3 | 46.5 | 13-26 | Toledo | 09-19 | Temple | -4.5 | 48.5 | 49-48 |
| | 09-12 | @ UCLA | +13.5 | 53.5 | 10-28 | | 09-12 | Central C. | -36.5 | 52.5 | 63-10 |
| | 09-05 | Portland . | -38.5 | 61 | 53-20 | | 09-04 | @ Michigan . | +10 | 48.5 | 20-30 |
| San Diego State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Portland St | -38.5 | L | 53-20 | OV | 61 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | W | 29-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ UCLA | 13.5 | L | 10-28 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | James Madison | -3 | L | 13-26 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 0-19 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Toledo |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-0-1 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Michigan State | 10 | PK | 20-30 | OV | 48.5 | 3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 6.5 | L | 7-19 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Central Conn. | -36.5 | W | 63-10 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 14-3 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Temple | -4.5 | L | 49-48 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | L | 14-24 | OV | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Delaware | 20 | 52 | 44 | | 42 | 43 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | +21.5 / -9 | -18 / +20.5 |
| Virginia | 38 | -20 | 18(2) | -28 | 17 | 28 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +41 / - | -25.5 / - |
Dating back to the end of last season, the Blue Hens are 4-1 straight-up, 5-0 against the spread. Delaware has already dipped its toe into the Power Four waters this year, and the Blue Hens handled themselves well in a nine-point loss at Vanderbilt. Virginia is coming off a 38-27 loss to West Virginia at a neutral venue in Charlotte, and if you didn't know which team was which, you never would have known that the Cavaliers were an 11.5-point favorite in that contest. Virginia jumped out to a 14-7 lead at the end of the first quarter, but the Mountaineers dominated after that. Some early money has shown on the over in this contest, and we agree with it. Delaware's Nick Minicucci is a polished QB with plenty of experience, but we're struggling to see how the Blue Hens' defense gets Beau Pribula and Co. off the field. The Missouri transfer ran for 110 yards against NC State in the opener, and Delaware's defense is not going to be able to pressure him the way West Virginia did last week.
Play the Over
| Delaware | 30 / 18.7 | +11.3 | 40 | 38 | -5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Virginia | 40 / 16.3 | +23.7 | 17 | 34 | -20.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Delaware | 09-19 | Coastal C. | -4.5 | 56.5 | 22-14 | Virginia | 09-19 | West Virg. | -10.5 | 51.5 | 27-38 |
| | 09-12 | @ Vanderbilt | +20.5 | 53.5 | 26-35 | | 09-11 | Norfolk St | -47 | 56.5 | 59-3 |
| | 09-03 | Merrimack. | -31.5 | 56.5 | 42-7 | | 08-29 | NC State | -4 | 50.5 | 34-8 |
| Delaware |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Merrimack College | -31.5 | W | 42-7 | UN | 56.5 | 0 | W | 7-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 20.5 | W | 26-35 | OV | 53.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 11.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Coastal Carolina | -4.5 | W | 22-14 | UN | 56.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | -3 | L | 15-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-02-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-13-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-0-1 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | NC State | -4 | W | 34-8 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -2.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Norfolk St | -47 | W | 59-3 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 28-3 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | West Virginia | -10.5 | L | 27-38 | OV | 51.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mississippi | 31 | 59 | 8 | | 8 | 8 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | +20 / - | -20.5 / - |
| Florida | 27 | -4 | 8.5(3) | -2.5 | 12 | 16 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +47 / +5 | -38.5 / -2.5 |
If you're trying to catch Ole Miss in a let-down spot following last week's emotional win over LSU, oddsmakers are making you pay a premium for it. Since the end of last season, we've upgraded Florida by nine points and we still can't justify the Gators laying 3.5 points in this matchup. Remember, the sky was never truly falling in Gainesville (like it is in Tallahassee), but the Gators simply couldn't survive the murderer's row of opponents that they had while playing under Billy Napier. So with a roster that has largely remained intact from last year, a nine-point adjustment after three weeks of play is quite generous for Florida, in our opinion. With that said, we have this game lined around a pick'em so oddsmakers were well-aware that bettors were looking to play against the Rebels after last week's win over their former head coach. Ole Miss running back Kewan Lacy is considered a game-time decision prior to this week's contest against Florida. Lacy's MRI showed no structural damage to his injured shoulder, so it's just a matter of pain tolerance and comfort as the Rebels travel to Gainesville. We're not taking anything away from what the Gators have accomplished thus far, but if you're going to give us a 3.5-point head start with the Rebels you have our attention. In one of the most-electrifying atmospheres in college football, Trinidad Chambliss delivered with 363 yards, two touchdowns through the air and one more on the ground. When these teams met in Oxford last season, Ole Miss closed as a 10.5-point home favorite and won by ten. Ten months later, the Gators are now laying more than a field goal in this matchup while the Rebels' only loss during that stretch was by four against Miami (Fla) in the national semifinal.
Play Ole Miss
09/22 9:38 AM PDT — Ole Miss running back Kewan Lacy is considered a game-time decision prior to this week's contest against Florida. Lacy's MRI showed no structural damage to his injured shoulder, so it's just a matter of pain tolerance and comfort as the Rebels travel to Gainesville.
| Mississippi | 38 / 23.7 | +14.3 | 9 | 25 | -16 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 |
| Florida | 54 / 21 | +33 | 14 | 36 | -26.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Mississippi | 09-19 | LSU | +3 | 59 | 32-24 | Florida | 09-19 | @ Auburn | -2.5 | 53.5 | 44-39 |
| | 09-12 | Charlotte | -44 | 59.5 | 41-9 | | 09-12 | Campbell | -51.5 | 66.5 | 52-3 |
| | 09-06 | Louisville | -6.5 | 54.5 | 41-38 | | 09-05 | Florida A. | -25.5 | 59.5 | 66-21 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Florida | 24 | 53.5 | 14 | 25/108 | 16/32/1/218 | 1/0 |
| Mississippi | 34 | -10 | 27 | 48/237 | 26/35/1/301 | 1/0 |
| 11-23-24 | Mississippi | 17 | -13 | 24 | 35/141 | 24/42/2/323 | 1/1 |
| Florida | 24 | 57.5 | 19 | 45/164 | 10/17/1/180 | 0/0 |
| Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-1-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Louisville | -6.5 | L | 41-38 | OV | 54.5 | -3 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | -4 | PK | 10-6 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Charlotte | -44 | L | 41-9 | UN | 59.5 | -13.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14.5 | -27.5 | L | 27-0 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | LSU | 3 | W | 32-24 | UN | 59 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | 1.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wofford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Florida Atlantic | -25.5 | W | 66-21 | OV | 59.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Campbell | -51.5 | L | 52-3 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 45-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Auburn | -2.5 | W | 44-39 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Virginia Tech | 27 | -14.5 | 17 | -15.5 | 18 | 22 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | +46.5 / +9 | -36.5 / -2.5 |
| Boston College | 20 | 45.5 | 33.5(1) | | 32 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | +6.5 / -19 | -20.5 / +7 |
The quirky James Franklin-Penn State-Virginia Tech triangle continues this week as Franklin's Hokies travel to Chestnut Hill. One week after his squad beat former longtime assistant Ricky Rahne and Old Dominion, Franklin now takes on the coach he replaced in Happy Valley over a decade ago. Bill O'Brien's Eagles almost got caught looking ahead to this one, only beating FCS-level Maine 22-16 last week as a 37.5-point home favorite. QB Mason McKenzie threw two interceptions in the sloppy effort. Virginia Tech has won-and-covered each of its first three games, and Franklin appears to have the Hokies' rebuild on a rapid trajectory. Back-to-back road games provide an interesting test, however, especially with a potentially-sleepy spot and a 12pm ET kickoff. Franklin had no problem getting his team fired up for a primetime spot at Maryland last week, but a noon kickoff at Alumni Stadium is a completely different story. Also, the Hokie faithful took the opportunity to invade nearby College Park last week to give Va Tech a home-like atmosphere. But how many of those folks are traveling to suburban Massachusetts this weekend with a home game against Pitt on the horizon next week? Franklin put a lot of effort and emphasis into last week's win over the Terps, but this feels like one that O'Brien has had circled for a while. BC's defensive performance against Rutgers in Week 2 looks even better when you consider what the Knights did against USC last week.
Play Boston College
| Virginia Tech | 50.7 / 16.7 | +34 | 18 | 38 | -25 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Boston College | 21.7 / 23.7 | -2 | 32 | 37 | -11 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Virginia Tech | 09-19 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | 53.5 | 35-26 | Boston College | 09-19 | Maine | -37.5 | 54.5 | 22-16 |
| | 09-12 | Old Domin. | -18 | 47.5 | 44-21 | | 09-11 | Rutgers | -3 | 53.5 | 28-21 |
| | 09-05 | VMI | -54.5 | 60.5 | 73-3 | | 09-05 | @ Cincinnat. | +7 | 51.5 | 15-34 |
|
| 10-17-24 | Boston College | 21 | 47.5 | 22 | 48/167 | 17/26/0/205 | 6/3 |
| Virginia Tech | 42 | -8.5 | 22 | 40/368 | 14/18/1/164 | 2/2 |
| Virginia Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | VMI | -54.5 | W | 73-3 | OV | 60.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 45-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Old Dominion | -18 | W | 44-21 | OV | 47.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-3 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | W | 34-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | W | 35-26 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -0.5 | W | 27-14 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-02-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Boston College |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-0-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Cincinnati U | 7 | L | 15-34 | UN | 51.5 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | L | 0-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Rutgers | -3 | W | 28-21 | UN | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Maine | -37.5 | L | 22-16 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 16-0 | OV | | | W | 19-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas State | 31 | -6 | 17.5 | -6 | 17 | 33 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | +35.3 / - | -26.5 / - |
| Cincinnati U | 20 | 55 | 25.5(2) | | 26 | 36 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | +25 / - | -19.5 / - |
In their lone meeting since the Bearcats joined the Big XII, Kansas State earned a 41-15 home win over Cincinnati in November 2024. The Wildcats have handled business in a professional manner thus far, winning home games against FCS-level Nicholls State, Washington State and Tulane by a combined margin of 136-30. Things didn't go swimmingly in Chris Klieman's final season in Manhattan, but Collin Klein inherited a cupboard that was already pretty full. Five of Kansas State's six losses came by less than a touchdown last year, and don't forget the Wildcats' season started with a trip to Ireland and they lost three games before their bye week. Klein inherited a team that was already knocking on the door, but unfortunately for Klieman in his final season, no one was answering. Things feel a little different in the Little Apple at the moment, and we're struggling to share that same sentiment for the Bearcats. Cincinnati has been playing with fire over the last two weeks, and this looks like a spot where the Bearcats get burned. Cincinnati was only leading FCS-level Western Carolina 14-10 near the end of the second quarter before eventually earning some separation. The Bearcats needed a furious fourth quarter rally to beat Miami (Oh) last week after falling behind 28-7. Georgia Southern transfer JC French IV doesn't move the needle for us in the passing department, and we have reservations about how he will look against Big XII defenses. The Bearcats have too many Jekyll and Hyde moments for our liking, and we would much prefer the steady hand of the Wildcats from Kansas State.
Play Kansas State
| Kansas State | 45.3 / 10 | +35.3 | 17 | 41 | -26.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| Cincinnati U | 43.7 / 18.7 | +25 | 26 | 41 | -19.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| Kansas State | 09-19 | Tulane | -20.5 | 50 | 31-20 | Cincinnati U | 09-19 | Miami Ohio | -14.5 | 51 | 35-31 |
| | 09-12 | Washingto. | -17.5 | 48.5 | 34-7 | | 09-12 | Western C. | -36.5 | 61.5 | 62-10 |
| | 09-05 | Nicholls . | -41.5 | 55.5 | 71-3 | | 09-05 | Boston Co. | -7 | 51.5 | 34-15 |
|
| 11-23-24 | Cincinnati U | 15 | 54 | 21 | 29/174 | 21/40/1/200 | 0/0 |
| Kansas State | 41 | -7.5 | 22 | 40/281 | 13/23/0/147 | 1/0 |
| Kansas State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:0-1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Nicholls State | -41.5 | W | 71-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 22-0 | OV | | | W | 36-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Washington State | -17.5 | W | 34-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10 | -10 | PK | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tulane | -20.5 | L | 31-20 | OV | 50 | -5.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Cincinnati U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Boston College | -7 | W | 34-15 | UN | 51.5 | -3 | PK | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 10-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Carolina | -36.5 | W | 62-10 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 28-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Miami Ohio | -14.5 | L | 35-31 | OV | 51 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10 | -7.5 | L | 7-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Boise State | 23 | -8 | 20 | -13.5 | 20 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | +16 / -7 | -19 / +25.5 |
| Western Michigan | 24 | 50.5 | 34.5(1) | | 36 | 45 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +35 / +3 | -29.5 / +10 |
While national attention focuses on matchups like Texas-Tennessee and Ole Miss-Florida this weekend, the most-impactful clash affecting the 12-team College Football Playoff might come in this Group of 6 showdown in Kalamazoo. We're a bit surprised, however, that the oddsmakers seem to have downgraded host WMU; if the Kalamazoo Broncos were awarded the win in the opener vs. Michigan, as should have been the case, would the oddsmakers and wagering public be granting WMU a bit more respect? Keep in mind if not for that controversial ending at Ann Arbor, Lance Taylor’s defending MAC champs would be bringing a nine-game winning streak into Waldo Stadium. The only spread loss in the last eight of those wins came last week at Rice when the Owls scored very late to slip inside of the TD-plus number. Taylor has the architects of that late-season surge a year ago and valiant effort at Michigan still in the fold, as careful QB Broc Lowry continues to avoid mistakes (only three interceptions since last season, and none yet in 2026), while chop-busting, twice 1000-yard RB Jalen Buckley remains hard to corral at nearly five yards per carry. Meanwhile, Boise’s near-miss in the opener at Oregon (much like the 2024 photo finish at Eugene) lost a bit of its luster when the Ducks were bounced the following week at Stillwater, and the Boise version of the Broncos found itself in some unexpected trouble last week vs. four-TD underdog FCS rep South Dakota, with the inspired ‘Yotes level at 24-24 well into the fourth quarter. Keep in mind that away from the blue carpet at Albertson’s Stadium, Boise has actually lost outright in six of its last eight away. In the last three road games a year ago, QB Maddux Madsen tossed seven picks and zero TD passes (though he did pass for 3 scores in the Oregon opener). Boise State is 0-5 against the spread in its last five non-conference games as a road favorite.
Play Western Michigan
| Boise State | 34.3 / 26 | +8.3 | 20 | 28 | -4 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Western Michigan | 29.7 / 16 | +13.7 | 35 | 37 | -3 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Boise State | 09-19 | South Dak. | -28.5 | 61.5 | 38-24 | Western Michigan | 09-19 | @ Rice | -7.5 | 43.5 | 28-21 |
| | 09-12 | Memphis | -9.5 | 55 | 38-20 | | 09-12 | Monmouth | -29.5 | 54.5 | 49-14 |
| | 09-05 | @ Oregon | +25.5 | 53 | 27-34 | | 09-05 | @ Michigan | +27.5 | 50.5 | 12-13 |
| Boise State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Oregon | 25.5 | W | 27-34 | OV | 53 | 7 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 14.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Memphis | -9.5 | W | 38-20 | OV | 55 | -3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -6 | L | 17-20 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | South Dakota | -28.5 | L | 38-24 | OV | 61.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-14 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Western Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Michigan | 27.5 | W | 12-13 | UN | 50.5 | 7 | W | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Monmouth | -29.5 | W | 49-14 | OV | 54.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rice | -7.5 | L | 28-21 | OV | 43.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| TCU | 31 | -3.5 | 21 | -3 | 19 | 39 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +40 / - | -32 / - |
| Central Florida | 24 | 48 | 27(3) | | 27 | 47 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | +40.5 / -5 | -30.5 / +7 |
In their lone meeting since the Knights joined the Big XII, UCF earned a 35-34 road win at TCU in September 2024. Both teams are coming off wins over inferior competition, but UCF has produced some head-scratching results. After holding Pitt to 12 points two weeks ago, the Knights' defense allowed 30 at home to Georgia State last week. Yes, that game against Pitt was impacted by weather which probably helped the Knights a little bit, but allowing 485 yards to Georgia State came out of nowhere. That was a legit back-and-forth affair all night and UCF didn't build that 14-point final margin until there was 1:24 remaining in the fourth quarter. UCF quarterback Alonza Barnett is not expected to play in this contest as he recovers from a hamstring injury. Florida International transfer Keyone Jenkins will remain the starter in Barnett's absence. After stumbling its toe against North Carolina in the opener, TCU has quietly handled business by a combined margin of 94-14 against Grambling and Arkansas State. The Horned Frogs have been on easy mode, while the Knights have been involved in a pair of battles. We respect the home field advantage that the Bounce House provides, but we have this game lined closer to a touchdown.
Play TCU
09/22 9:28 AM PDT — UCF quarterback Alonza Barnett is not expected to play in this contest as he recovers from a hamstring injury. Florida International transfer Keyone Jenkins will remain the starter in Barnett's absence.
| TCU | 34.7 / 9.7 | +25 | 18 | 39 | -23.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Central Florida | 41.3 / 16 | +25.3 | 27 | 40 | -18 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| TCU | 09-19 | Arkansas . | -19 | 56.5 | 31-7 | Central Florida | 09-19 | Georgia S. | -17.5 | 50.5 | 44-30 |
| | 09-12 | Grambling | -44.5 | 55.5 | 63-7 | | 09-12 | @ Pittsburg. | +7 | 55 | 7-12 |
| | 08-29 | North Car. | -7.5 | 46.5 | 10-15 | | 09-03 | Bethune C. | -43.5 | 58.5 | 73-6 |
| TCU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | North Carolina | -7.5 | L | 10-15 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | L | 10-12 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Grambling | -44.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Arkansas St | -19 | W | 31-7 | UN | 56.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Central Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Bethune Cookman | -43.5 | W | 73-6 | OV | 58.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 38-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 7 | W | 7-12 | UN | 55 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 13 | 4.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia State | -17.5 | L | 44-30 | OV | 50.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 20-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| No Illinois | 23 | 56.5 | 50 | | 48 | 18 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | -4 / -32.5 | +2.5 / +33 |
| Georgia State | 38 | -8.5 | 43(1) | -8 | 48 | 28 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +49 / 0 | -28.5 / +12.5 |
You don't have to travel very far for a recap of Georgia State's narrow loss to UCF because that game is right above this one. The Panthers produced a fantastic effort against the Knights, and UCF didn't achieve that 14-point final margin of victory until there was under 90 seconds remaining in the fourth quarter. Georgia State out-gained the Knights by 95 yards and held a 25-17 advantage in first downs. The Panthers are 3-0 against the spread this season with an outright upset over Kennesaw State and a near-miss as a 17.5-point 'dog against the Knights last week. This is a brutal travel spot for the Huskies, who are on the second leg of a road back-to-back after playing at Arizona last week. Northern Illinois took a shocking 10-0 lead out of the gate, but was out-scored 42-7 after that. Wildcats' QB Noah Fifita went 31-of-34 through the air for 325 yards with four touchdowns and no interceptions. The Huskies' defensive backs just got torched on the other side of the country against a solid team from the Big XII, and now have to face a much-improved Georgia State side with a 2pm ET kickoff in Atlanta. From a power ratings' perspective, this is a big number for the Panthers to be laying. But in terms of the spot and situation, things couldn't be much worse for the Huskies at the moment. At the beginning of the season, this looked like one of the few wins that Northern Illinois would achieve in the Huskies' debut season in the Mountain West. Now, they find themselves as ten-point underdogs.
Play Georgia State
| No Illinois | 13.7 / 36.7 | -23 | 47 | 30 | +22.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Georgia State | 40 / 23.7 | +16.3 | 49 | 41 | -1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| No Illinois | 09-19 | @ Arizona U | +34.5 | 50 | 17-42 | Georgia State | 09-19 | @ Central F. | +17.5 | 50.5 | 30-44 |
| | 09-12 | Illinois . | +2.5 | 48 | 24-28 | | 09-12 | @ Kennesaw . | +7.5 | 55.5 | 31-17 |
| | 09-05 | @ Iowa | +31 | 44.5 | 0-40 | | 09-04 | N. Caroli. | -28.5 | 58.5 | 59-10 |
| No Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:0-3 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Iowa | 31 | L | 0-40 | UN | 44.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-20 | OV | 10 | 18.5 | L | 0-33 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Illinois State | 2.5 | L | 24-28 | OV | 48 | | L | 0-14 | OV | | | L | 17-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arizona U | 34.5 | W | 17-42 | OV | 50 | 7.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 10-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | N. Carolina A&T | -28.5 | W | 59-10 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kennesaw State | 7.5 | W | 31-17 | UN | 55.5 | 2.5 | W | 6-3 | UN | 12.5 | 4.5 | W | 21-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Florida | 17.5 | W | 30-44 | OV | 50.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 24-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oklahoma | 13 | 44 | 12.5 | | 10 | 29 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | +29.5 / -7 | -31.5 / -5 |
| Georgia | 31 | -11 | 2(3) | -13.5 | 3 | 24 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | +55 / +28 | -45 / -24.5 |
This will be the first meeting between the Sooners and Bulldogs since their memorable 54-48 classic in the 2018 Rose Bowl. Prior to the start of the season, DraftKings had Georgia lined as a ten-point favorite against the Sooners. As we go to print on Tuesday night, we're looking at Bulldogs -14 across the market. Too big of an adjustment? Perhaps, but what have you seen from the Sooners thus far to suggest that they can hang in this matchup? In what should have been a comfortable tune-up game as a three-touchdown favorite, Oklahoma beat New Mexico 14-6 last week. If you've already read our Texas-Tennessee preview for this week, you know that we were quite tough on Longhorns QB Arch Manning. It's only fair that we split the Red River blame because John Mateer doesn't look like a championship-winning quarterback. Mateer threw two interceptions last week against the Lobos and he finished with 17 rushing yards on ten attempts. The Oklahoma injury report continues to get worse by the week as defensive tackle David Stone reportedly suffered a serious knee injury in practice on Monday. We were on the over in last week's SEC opener between Georgia and Arkansas, so we were one of 17 people that were still watching the final minutes of that 45-17 demolition. The Razorbacks scored two garbage time touchdowns in the fourth quarter, including one with 40 seconds left. The ESPN cameras certainly caught Kirby Smart's reaction, and it was probably one that Oklahoma head coach didn't want to see. If Smart is so comfortable with his team that he's mad about garbage time scores in a five-touchdown blowout, that's not a good sign for the rest of the SEC. Look for the Bulldogs to play 60 minutes this week, not 55.
Play Georgia
09/22 9:58 AM PDT — The Oklahoma injury report continues to get worse by the week as defensive tackle David Stone reportedly suffered a serious knee injury in practice on Monday.
| Oklahoma | 25 / 7.7 | +17.3 | 8 | 30 | -22.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Georgia | 59.3 / 13.3 | +46 | 3 | 40 | -38 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Oklahoma | 09-19 | New Mexico | -21.5 | 45.5 | 14-6 | Georgia | 09-19 | @ Arkansas | -24.5 | 54.5 | 45-17 |
| | 09-12 | @ Michigan | -5 | 43.5 | 10-17 | | 09-12 | Western K. | -40.5 | 55.5 | 70-20 |
| | 09-04 | UTEP | -41 | 51.5 | 51-0 | | 09-05 | Tennessee. | -49.5 | 55.5 | 63-3 |
| Oklahoma |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-04-26 | UTEP | -41 | W | 51-0 | UN | 51.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 12.5 | -24 | W | 27-0 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Michigan | -5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 43.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 0-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | New Mexico | -21.5 | L | 14-6 | UN | 45.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -12.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tennessee St | -49.5 | W | 63-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Western Kentucky | -40.5 | W | 70-20 | OV | 55.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -24.5 | W | 49-6 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arkansas | -24.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | W | 21-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tech Play | | Updated: 09/22 11:11 pm |
| Illinois | 16 | 53.5 | 18 | | 18 | 55 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 | +17.7 / - | -22 / - |
| Ohio State | 34 | -26 | 3(3) | -18 | 3 | 49 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | +54.5 / -1 | -51 / +2 |
Ohio State has won each of the last ten meetings in this Big Ten matchup, but we're struggling to justify this near-four-touchdown point spread on Saturday in Columbus. When the Buckeyes traveled to Champagne last year, Ohio State closed as a 14.5-point road favorite and won by 18. Illinois actually out-gained OSU by a 295-272 mark, but the Illini finished with a -3 turnover differential. Illinois' rushing defense held Bo Jackson and CJ Donaldson to 91 yards on 23 rushing attempts, and star receiver Jeremiah Smith caught five balls for 42 yards. Obviously the turnovers were an issue, but from a defensive standpoint, Illinois head coach Bret Bielema had a fantastic gameplan in place. So why are we looking at a 27-point spread in this one?! We're not sure, but we'll take the Illini. Aside from getting throttled by Indiana last year (like almost everyone else), Bielema has been a good coach as an underdog in these spots. In 2024, the Illini earned outright upset wins over Kansas, Nebraska, Michigan, Rutgers and South Carolina, and easily covered the spread at Penn State's White Out as a big ‘dog. In 2025, Illinois beat Tennessee and USC as a 'dog, and had a solid showing against Ohio State aside from the turnovers. Also, Illinois' narrow Week 2 loss against Duke is aging quite well considering the Blue Devils are still unbeaten and just beat a conference opponent by four touchdowns. Betting against the Buckeyes is rarely enjoyable, but we can't get anywhere near this number in our power ratings.
Play Illinois
| Illinois | 39 / 21.3 | +17.7 | 18 | 40 | -22 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 |
| Ohio State | 46 / 10 | +36 | 4 | 34 | -33.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Illinois | 09-19 | Southern . | -35 | 56.5 | 48-10 | Ohio State | 09-19 | Kent State | -52 | 58.5 | 59-3 |
| | 09-12 | Duke | -6 | 51.5 | 27-31 | | 09-12 | @ Texas | +2 | 50.5 | 23-24 |
| | 09-03 | UAB | -25.5 | 54 | 42-23 | | 09-05 | Ball State | -50 | 55.5 | 56-3 |
|
| 10-11-25 | Ohio State | 34 | -14.5 | 17 | 35/109 | 19/27/0/166 | 0/0 |
| Illinois | 16 | 51.5 | 22 | 27/47 | 30/44/1/248 | 2/2 |
| Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | UAB | -25.5 | L | 42-23 | OV | 54 | -7 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | L | 21-13 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Duke | -6 | L | 27-31 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Southern Illinois | -35 | W | 48-10 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ohio State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Ball State | -50 | W | 56-3 | OV | 55.5 | -13.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -28.5 | L | 28-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas | 2 | W | 23-24 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kent State | -52 | W | 59-3 | OV | 58.5 | -13.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14.5 | -31.5 | W | 35-0 | UN | 35.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wisconsin | 16 | 44 | 19 | | 20 | 45 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +35.5 / - | -33.5 / - |
| Penn State | 27 | -9.5 | 14.5(3) | -7.5 | 13 | 46 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +43.5 / +18 | -31.5 / -24 |
Penn State has won-and-covered each of the last six meetings in this Big Ten matchup, with the last one being a 28-13 road win in Madison in 2024. Wisconsin hasn't won at Beaver Stadium since Penn State's controversial 2011 season when the wheels fell off the Joe Paterno regime. We've got a rare 5pm ET start time in Happy Valley for this one as Penn State and Wisconsin set the Peacock stage for Oregon and USC to follow in the nightcap. After a trio of strong efforts against weak opposition in the non-conference slate, this will be Matt Campbell's Big Ten debut for the Nittany Lions. Wisconsin has rebounded nicely since a Week 1 loss to Notre Dame, but the Badgers played with their food a little bit against Eastern Michigan last week. That was a 10-7 game at the midway point of the second quarter before the Eagles lost top receiver Nick Devereaux to injury. Wisconsin opened the scoring after that en route to a comfortable victory. We've got some major question marks on both sides in this Big Ten matchup. Badgers' running back Abu Sama did not play in last week's win over Eastern Michigan, and he is questionable to return this week with an undisclosed injury. Penn State wide receiver Koby Howard is also dealing with an undisclosed injury that he suffered at the end of the Nittany Lions' win over Buffalo last week. The Nittany Lions have allowed a total of 22 points through their first three games, and the only touchdown that Penn State has allowed this season was last week against Buffalo in the fourth quarter with the scoreboard reading 55-6. Badgers' starting QB Colton Joseph has performed well thus far, but he didn't see too many environments like this when playing at Old Dominion over the last two years. Look for Wisconsin head coach Luke Fickell to keep things simple out of the chute as Joseph gets his feet wet in a hostile environment.
Play the Under
09/22 9:34 AM PDT — We've got some major question marks on both sides in this Big Ten matchup. Badgers' running back Abu Sama did not play in last week's win over Eastern Michigan, and he is questionable to return this week with an undisclosed injury. Penn State wide receiver Koby Howard is also dealing with an undisclosed injury that he suffered at the end of the Nittany Lions' win over Buffalo last week.
| Wisconsin | 34.3 / 20 | +14.3 | 21 | 34 | -15 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Penn State | 42.3 / 7.3 | +35 | 12 | 39 | -29 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Wisconsin | 09-19 | Eastern M. | -23.5 | 44 | 54-10 | Penn State | 09-19 | Buffalo U | -40 | 48.5 | 55-13 |
| | 09-12 | Western I. | -43 | 53 | 36-9 | | 09-12 | @ Temple | -24 | 49.5 | 27-9 |
| | 09-06 | @ Notre Dame | +21.5 | 46 | 13-41 | | 09-05 | Marshall | -23 | 53.5 | 45-0 |
|
| 10-26-24 | Penn State | 28 | -6.5 | 22 | 35/173 | 25/31/0/246 | 2/1 |
| Wisconsin | 13 | 47 | 16 | 27/81 | 22/42/1/217 | 0/0 |
| Wisconsin |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Notre Dame | 21.5 | L | 13-41 | OV | 46 | 6.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Illinois | -43 | L | 36-9 | UN | 53 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 23-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Eastern Michigan | -23.5 | W | 54-10 | OV | 44 | -6.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Penn State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Marshall | -23 | W | 45-0 | UN | 53.5 | -7 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Temple | -24 | L | 27-9 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | L | 10-3 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | Buffalo U | -40 | W | 55-13 | OV | 48.5 | -10.5 | W | 17-3 | OV | 13.5 | -24 | W | 34-6 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-02-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Notre Dame | 42 | -27 | 2.5 | -27.5 | 3 | 23 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | +34.5 / - | -37 / - |
| Purdue | 17 | 57 | 31(1) | | 31 | 19 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | +11.5 / -14 | -16.5 / +13.5 |
Since this Hoosier State rivalry was renewed in 2024, the Irish have won-and-covered the last two meetings by a combined score of 122-37. It's hard to believe that Notre Dame was only a 7.5-point favorite against the Boilermakers when these teams met two years ago. Notre Dame is coming off a 27-10 home win over Michigan State last week, and we'll echo a lot of the same points we made in that preview. Marcus Freeman's team is currently in a completely different place than they were a year ago. Notre Dame opened the season with back-to-back losses to Miami (Fla) and Texas A&M, both in heartbreaking fashion. The Irish needed style points the rest of the way, hence why we saw a 26-point win over Purdue, a 29-point win over NC State, a 39-point win over Navy, a 22-point win over Pitt, a 63-point win over Syracuse and a 29-point win over Stanford. The Irish needed every possible style point as they tried to (unsuccessfully) stay in the good graces of the College Football Playoff committee. We're looking at a completely different ballgame in 2026 where the Irish just need to stack wins. Notre Dame had very little interest in running up the score against Rice in Week 2, but it's hard not to when your opponent fumbles five times. Notre Dame never had the look of a team that was going to cover a 28-point spread against Michigan State last week. This is a tough travel spot for Purdue after a late-night kick at UCLA, but we can only look in the Boilermakers' direction. Irish running back Anyeas Williams only generated 25 rushing yards on nine carries last week against the Spartans. Notre Dame's biggest focus during this stretch against lesser opponents is to get the running game going, which typically doesn't lend itself to covering four-touchdown spreads.
Play Purdue
| Notre Dame | 40 / 7.7 | +32.3 | 3 | 29 | -31.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 |
| Purdue | 39.3 / 36.3 | +3 | 31 | 33 | -6.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Notre Dame | 09-19 | Michigan . | -29 | 51.5 | 27-10 | Purdue | 09-19 | @ UCLA | +13.5 | 53 | 38-52 |
| | 09-12 | Rice | -44.5 | 54.5 | 52-0 | | 09-12 | Wake Fore. | +2.5 | 51.5 | 36-38 |
| | 09-06 | Wisconsin | -21.5 | 46 | 41-13 | | 09-04 | Indiana S. | -35 | 56 | 44-19 |
|
| 09-20-25 | Purdue | 30 | 51.5 | 20 | 28/76 | 25/39/2/303 | 1/0 |
| Notre Dame | 56 | -24.5 | 27 | 39/258 | 17/20/0/281 | 1/1 |
| Notre Dame |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Wisconsin | -21.5 | W | 41-13 | OV | 46 | -6.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Rice | -44.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 54.5 | -13.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -26.5 | W | 42-0 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Michigan State | -29 | L | 27-10 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -17.5 | L | 17-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Purdue |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Indiana State | -35 | L | 44-19 | OV | 56 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 16-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Wake Forest | 2.5 | W | 36-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 1 | L | 10-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ UCLA | 13.5 | L | 38-52 | OV | 53 | 4.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ball State | 23 | 51.5 | 50 | | 49 | 36 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 | +24 / -44.5 | -13.5 / +32.5 |
| Kent State | 24 | -2.5 | 48(1) | -3 | 48 | 4 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 | +21 / -56.5 | -10 / +44 |
Ball State has won six of the last seven meetings, including a 17-13 home win over the Flashes last season. Three of the last four meetings have stayed under the total. Both teams are coming off tough losses to superior opponents as Kent State fell 59-3 against Ohio State while Ball State was crushed 51-15 at Liberty. For what it's worth, the Cardinals also played the Buckeyes earlier this season and fell by a very similar 56-3 score. This is essentially the first game that we'll actually learn something about either squad. Both got crushed by Power Four opposition in two games apiece. Both beat an FCS-level opponent to earn their first-and-only win of the season. We have this game lined closer to a pick'em, so we're mildly interested in taking the +3.5 head start with the Cardinals. While Liberty thoroughly crushed Ball State last week, the Flames' offensive and defensive lines aren't going to be confused with Ohio State's any time soon. So just from a physicality standpoint, Kent State may have a few extra bumps and bruises after last week's loss to the Buckeyes. But this game is probably best left-alone and used as a data point as these teams enter MAC
play in the coming weeks.
| Ball State | 19.7 / 41.3 | -21.7 | 48 | 32 | +17 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Kent State | 13 / 43.7 | -30.7 | 49 | 25 | +26 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Ball State | 09-19 | @ Liberty | +14.5 | 49.5 | 15-51 | Kent State | 09-19 | @ Ohio State | +52 | 58.5 | 3-59 |
| | 09-12 | Stony Bro. | -13.5 | 52 | 41-17 | | 09-12 | Wofford | -10 | 46 | 36-15 |
| | 09-05 | @ Ohio State | +50 | 55.5 | 3-56 | | 09-05 | @ South Car. | +35.5 | 53 | 0-57 |
|
| 11-05-25 | Kent State | 13 | 49 | 14 | 33/89 | 15/28/1/212 | 0/0 |
| Ball State | 17 | -3 | 15 | 33/65 | 17/29/0/173 | 0/0 |
| 10-12-24 | Ball State | 37 | -3 | 25 | 39/191 | 21/35/0/215 | 0/0 |
| Kent State | 35 | 58 | 20 | 30/67 | 17/36/1/394 | 1/0 |
| Ball State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Ohio State | 50 | L | 3-56 | OV | 55.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 28.5 | W | 3-28 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Stony Brook | -13.5 | W | 41-17 | OV | 52 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Liberty | 14.5 | L | 15-51 | OV | 49.5 | 4.5 | L | 7-13 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 7-23 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kent State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-3 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ South Carolina | 35.5 | L | 0-57 | OV | 53 | 9.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 21 | L | 0-29 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wofford | -10 | W | 36-15 | OV | 46 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | L | 14-15 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Ohio State | 52 | L | 3-59 | OV | 58.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14.5 | 31.5 | L | 0-35 | UN | 35.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oklahoma State | 34 | 60.5 | 21.5 | -2.5 | 23 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +33.5 / -14 | -16 / -12.5 |
| West Virginia | 27 | -2 | 27(3) | | 27 | 17 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | +26 / - | -31.5 / - |
Considering Oklahoma State and West Virginia typically feature two of the best home field advantages in the Big XII, it's surprising to note that the road team has won each of the last four meetings in this series. The Cowboys earned a 48-34 win in Morgantown in 2023 as a three-point road 'dog, and the Mountaineers returned the favor as a road 'dog in Stillwater a year later. Five of the last six meetings between these teams have stayed under the total. We touched on West Virginia's victory over Virginia in our Cavaliers' preview, but anyone that didn't know the point spread heading into that game never would have guessed that Virginia was the 11-point favorite in that contest. Rich Rodriguez had his team ready to play in that one and the 'Neers dominated UVA over the final three quarters. We can't help but wonder what the sentiment around this team would be right now if they didn't lay a small egg against Coastal Carolina in the opener. WVU jumped out to a 24-0 lead at halftime against the Chanticleers then forgot to come out of the locker room for the second half. Oklahoma State laid its own egg in Week 1 against Tulsa, but the Cowboys have recovered nicely with back-to-back home wins over Oregon and Murray State. Any fears of a let-down after beating the Ducks were quickly put to bed as the Cowboys led 31-0 at halftime against the Racers. Our numbers are in-line with where this game has opened so we're not showing much value on either side, but we're inclined to side with the visiting team trend. Pokes QB Drew Mestemaker went 26-of-43 for 317 yards against Oregon and he added 109 more on the ground. Morgantown is a tough place to play, but at this point in his career, Mestemaker has played a number of games in high-stress environments. He shouldn't be too fazed by the Mountaineer faithful.
Play Oklahoma State
| Oklahoma State | 36 / 18.3 | +17.7 | 23 | 31 | -14.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| West Virginia | 40.3 / 19.3 | +21 | 27 | 39 | -17.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Oklahoma State | 09-19 | Murray St. | -55.5 | 70 | 59-0 | West Virginia | 09-19 | @ Virginia | +10.5 | 51.5 | 38-27 |
| | 09-12 | Oregon | +24 | 55.5 | 39-31 | | 09-12 | Tenn Mart. | -41.5 | 57 | 52-7 |
| | 09-05 | @ Tulsa | -12.5 | 57.5 | 10-24 | | 09-05 | Coastal C. | -21 | 54.5 | 31-24 |
|
| 10-05-24 | West Virginia | 38 | 65 | 31 | 65/389 | 10/16/0/169 | 0/0 |
| Oklahoma State | 14 | -3 | 11 | 21/36 | 14/24/2/191 | 0/0 |
| Oklahoma State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Tulsa | -12.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 57.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 3-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Oregon | 24 | W | 39-31 | OV | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | W | 24-17 | OV | 30 |
| 09-19-26 | Murray State | -55.5 | W | 59-0 | UN | 70 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| West Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Coastal Carolina | -21 | L | 31-24 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Tenn Martin | -41.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 57 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Virginia | 10.5 | W | 38-27 | OV | 51.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Houston U | 31 | -17 | 17 | -21.5 | 18 | 9 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | +42 / -2 | -36.5 / +8 |
| Georgia Southern | 17 | 56.5 | 39.5(1) | | 39 | 38 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | +31 / -9.5 | -28.5 / +11.5 |
Veteran head coach Willie Fritz is generally prepared for everything, and although we have no idea how much of a hand he plays in the Cougars' scheduling department, this certainly looks and feels like a well-scheduled spot for Houston. The Cougs are coming off a disappointing loss to Texas Tech where Coach Fritz's team looked equal, if not better than the Red Raiders for large stretches of that contest. Any potential fears about a let-down spot after that disappointing defeat will likely disappear since this game was essentially scheduled to celebrate Fritz. Houston's trek to Georgia Southern will be the first time the Eagles have ever hosted a ranked opponent. Fritz went 17-7 in two seasons at Georgia Southern before leaving for Tulane in 2016. Eagles' head coach Clay Helton played quarterback at Houston, so both head coaches have plenty of respect for the opposing sideline. Helton's team is licking its wounds after blowing a 17-point lead to Jacksonville State last week. In his Monday press conference, Helton said, "We played our best football as a team for three quarters but did not play to standard in the fourth quarter that cost us the football game from not paying attention to the little details." Given the nature of this game, we're inclined to look toward the under. Helton is preaching mistake-free football and playing a cleaner game before the Eagles hit Sun Belt play. Neither head coach is looking to run up the score on the other. Houston doesn't have a bye until Halloween, so the Cougars open the season with eight-straight games. This is their last chance to catch any kind of breather before conference play resumes next week against UCF.
Play the Under
| Houston U | 45.3 / 18 | +27.3 | 18 | 33 | -21.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Georgia Southern | 21.7 / 17.7 | +4 | 38 | 37 | -2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Houston U | 09-18 | @ Texas Tech | +8 | 52.5 | 26-28 | Georgia Southern | 09-19 | @ Jacksonvi. | +3.5 | 51.5 | 27-31 |
| | 09-12 | Southern | -52 | 61.5 | 77-6 | | 09-12 | @ Clemson | +19.5 | 54.5 | 7-22 |
| | 09-05 | Oregon St. | -21 | 50.5 | 33-20 | | 09-05 | Charlesto. | -28.5 | 51.5 | 31-0 |
| Houston U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Oregon State | -21 | L | 33-20 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 9-7 | OV | 10.5 | -12.5 | L | 19-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern | -52 | W | 77-6 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 49-0 | OV | |
| 09-18-26 | @ Texas Tech | 8 | W | 26-28 | OV | 52.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 17-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia Southern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Charleston Southern | -28.5 | W | 31-0 | UN | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 24-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Clemson | 19.5 | W | 7-22 | UN | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11 | W | 7-16 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 3.5 | L | 27-31 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 24-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Air Force | 29 | -4.5 | 33.5 | -5.5 | 33 | 29 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +14 / - | -15 / - |
| Nevada | 20 | 50.5 | 41(2) | | 40 | 48 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +11 / -7 | +2.5 / -3.5 |
There was hope in Reno that they could hold off until at least after Halloween on switching local discussions to Steve Alford and Wolf Pack basketball, but back-to-back losses to Montana State and Middle Tennessee have had the same familiar ring as Jeff Choate’s last two editions that each won only three games. Simply, not enough offense, and even the return of QB Carter Jones last week at Murfreesboro couldn’t spark Nevada, which let a fourth quarter lead slip away against Derek Mason’s limited Blue Raiders. A supposedly-improved infantry that destroyed Western Kentucky with 323 yards rusghing in the opener went AWOL at MTSU when gaining a puny 2.3 yards per carry, and the question this week is just how much the Wolf Pack is going to have its hands on the ball in the first place against Troy Calhoun’s always-awkward version of the option that once again ranks as one of the nation’s rushing leaders at 319 yards per game on the ground. The Falcons will land at Reno-Tahoe International well-rested off a bye following a gallant effort that fell short vs. new Mountain West power North Dakota State, but the Force still has option-master QB Liam Szarka, who has amassed over 1,000 rushing yards as pilot of Mike Thiessen’s offense since last season, and the Falcons also have a change-of-pace alternative these days in sophomore Even Medders, who got the ball downfield enough to fire a late TD pass vs. the Bison. Calhoun also thinks he has enough defense this season to carry these sorts of short prices on the road, as the return of defensive coordinator Steve Russ from an NFL sojourn and several playmakers from a year ago suggests this will be an improved Force stop unit that shouldn’t be discounted for the loss to potent NDSU. Besides, Calhoun’s teams have been traveling well lately in the Mountain West, covering five of their last six as a conference visitor including an outright win at Mackay Stadium two years ago.
Play Air Force
| Air Force | 33 / 19 | +14 | 32 | 42 | -15 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Nevada | 25.3 / 20.3 | +5 | 39 | 47 | +0.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Air Force | 09-12 | North Dak. | +2 | 48.5 | 32-38 | Nevada | 09-19 | @ Middle Te. | -3.5 | 50.5 | 20-27 |
| | 09-05 | Duquesne | -31.5 | 55.5 | 34-0 | | 09-12 | Montana S. | +4.5 | 51.5 | 7-20 |
| | | | | | | | 09-05 | Western K. | PK | 51.5 | 49-14 |
|
| 11-23-24 | Air Force | 22 | 44.5 | 22 | 67/318 | 0/3/1/0 | 0/0 |
| Nevada | 19 | -3 | 21 | 25/94 | 22/35/1/268 | 0/0 |
| Air Force |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Duquesne | -31.5 | W | 34-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 20-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | North Dakota State | 2 | L | 32-38 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 13-28 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nevada |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Kentucky | 0 | W | 49-14 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 21-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Montana State | 4.5 | L | 7-20 | UN | 51.5 | | L | 0-10 | OV | | | L | 0-17 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | -3.5 | L | 20-27 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/22 9:09 pm |
| Minnesota U | 17 | 45 | 20.5 | | 20 | 52 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | +20.3 / - | -21.5 / - |
| Washington U | 22 | -12 | 18(3) | -5.5 | 16 | 55 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | +16 / - | -31.5 / - |
So unimpressive in September that it has dropped from the national rankings (at least the AP version) despite not yet losing a game, we might need a bit more evidence than a win over an also-ran Big Sky like Eastern Washington that the Huskies have shifted gears to resemble last year’s attack that scored better than 34 points per game. We suggest that Jedd Fisch might have been looking longingly at the Denver Broncos game last Sunday vs. the Jags and RB Jonah Coleman, who spearheaded the U-Dub infantry last season before moving to the NFL. Despite a forgiving early slate featuring three home games vs. 3-TD-plus underdogs, the Huskies still aren't running the ball like they did with Coleman, as aside from scrambles by QB Demond Williams, Fisch's running backs are gaining only a paltry 3.8 yards per carry vs. less-than-stellar opposition. As for Williams, regional sources are wondering if his on-again, off-again dalliance with LSU in the portal and reluctant return to Seattle might have caused some teammates to tune him out. At least there doesn’t seem too much wrong with the Ryan Walters defense that’s allowing only 13 points per game, albeit vs. limited opposition, with the question this week if PJ Fleck’s visiting Gophers have that much more pop in their attack than U-Dub’s recent outclassed victims. Usually able to run, Fleck’s 2025 edition couldn’t as it finished well up the track (126th, to be exact) in national rushing stats, and leading returnee RB Darius Taylor could be missing again after a leg injury that kept him out of last week’s game vs. Akron. Even with capable QB Drake Lindsey (18 TD passes last season) still in the fold, Minnesota's offense is hardly a smooth-running machine, as the recent heavy loss vs. Mississippi State indicated. At the moment, however, we have little interest backing Washington, which hasn't come close to covering a spread in its three wins out of the chute vs. softer touches. Besides, Fleck can always get his team in payback mode by showing film of the 1961 Rose Bowl, when the top-ranked Gophers were dumped by Jim Owens' rough-and-tumble, underdog Seattle bunch.
Play the Under
| Minnesota U | 37.7 / 17.3 | +20.3 | 20 | 42 | -21.5 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Washington U | 29.3 / 13.3 | +16 | 14 | 43 | -31.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Minnesota U | 09-19 | Akron | -22.5 | 48.5 | 41-7 | Washington U | 09-19 | Eastern W. | -42.5 | 59 | 48-16 |
| | 09-12 | Mississip. | +1 | 53.5 | 13-38 | | 09-12 | Utah State | -28 | 55.5 | 16-14 |
| | 09-03 | Eastern I. | -42.5 | 52.5 | 59-7 | | 09-06 | Washingto. | -24 | 51.5 | 24-10 |
| Minnesota U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Eastern Illinois | -42.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 52.5 | 0 | W | 14-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 35-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Mississippi St | 1 | L | 13-38 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | L | 6-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Akron | -22.5 | W | 41-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Washington U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Washington State | -24 | L | 24-10 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -14 | L | 10-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Utah State | -28 | L | 16-14 | UN | 55.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -17 | L | 10-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Eastern Washington | -42.5 | L | 48-16 | OV | 59 | | W | 14-3 | OV | | | W | 31-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hawaii | 24 | -2 | 39 | -1 | 36 | 45 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 | -2.5 / -10 | -3 / +4.5 |
| Wyoming | 16 | 44 | 43(3) | | 41 | 46 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | +8 / -18 | -23.5 / +0.5 |
What is it they say about the “best laid plans of mice and men?” Whatever, it seems like Wyoming head coach Jay Sawvel’s desperate roll of the dice to import much of William & Mary’s offense from last season, including coordinator Christian Taylor and QB Tyler Hughes, is running aground like most other attempts to enliven the Cowboy attack since Josh Allen left Laramie several years ago. Against the two FBS foes (Colorado State and Central Michigan) on the schedule, Hughes has tossed zero touchdown passes and five interceptions. That’s not even counting the game against FCS-level Northern Colorado, where the Cowboys needed a fourth quarter rally to finally get ahead of the winless Big Sky rep, which outgained Wyoming in the process. Of course, the best chance for the Cowboys this week might have less to do with Sawvel, Taylor or Hughes and instead with Hawaii making the long trip (try finding the connections from Honolulu to Laramie with your travel agent) and playing a game at 7,220 feet after living and working near the base of Diamond Head, though the Rainbow Warriors did win along the Front Range at Air Force (not much lower elevation-wise than Laramie) and Colorado State last fall. Hawaii also has some offense and a QB not afraid to whip the ball around the field, sophomore Micah Alejado, who passed for 24 TDs a year ago. When last seen letting it rip vs. New Mexico State, Alejado hit the Aggies for 346 passing yards as Timmy Chang’s team finally got in the win column two weeks ago. Let us also not forget a season ago, when the Cowboys made the trip the other way but might as well have been partying at Waikiki Beach when drilled 27-7 as Hawaii piled up over 400 yards and Alejado fired a pair of TD passes before Chang called off the dogs in the fourth quarter. If Wyoming thinks the elevation is going to be its only chance, maybe a switch of venue to the Grand Tetons might be in order, because Laramie doesn’t seem high enough to give this sluggish, 126th-ranked offense any advantage as the Pokes risk an eighth-straight spread loss since late last season.
Play Hawaii
| Hawaii | 20.7 / 25.7 | -5 | 34 | 34 | -0.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Wyoming | 14.7 / 24 | -9.3 | 40 | 47 | -7.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Hawaii | 09-12 | New Mexic. | -7.5 | 50.5 | 29-19 | Wyoming | 09-19 | @ Central M. | -1.5 | 40 | 10-24 |
| | 09-05 | UNLV | +1.5 | 55 | 6-21 | | 09-12 | Northern . | -23.5 | 44.5 | 21-13 |
| | 08-29 | @ Stanford | +4.5 | 48.5 | 27-37 | | 09-05 | @ Colorado . | +2.5 | 46 | 13-35 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Wyoming | 7 | 45 | 16 | 28/54 | 20/37/1/202 | 0/0 |
| Hawaii | 27 | -8.5 | 14 | 33/128 | 17/25/1/289 | 0/0 |
| Hawaii |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Stanford | 4.5 | L | 27-37 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10 | 3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 24 |
| 09-05-26 | UNLV | 1.5 | L | 6-21 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | New Mexico State | -7.5 | W | 29-19 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 9-0 | UN | 10 | -4 | W | 19-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wyoming |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-3 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Colorado State | 2.5 | L | 13-35 | OV | 46 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9 | 0.5 | L | 6-14 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Northern Colorado | -23.5 | L | 21-13 | UN | 44.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 7-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Michigan | -1.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 40 | 0 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 19.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Massachusetts | 35 | -6 | 40.5 | -13.5 | 44 | 55 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | +24.5 / +16 | -27.5 / +29.5 |
| Sacramento State | 24 | 49 | 55(1) | | 52 | 27 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 1-1 | +15.5 / -28.5 | -7 / +13 |
Raise your hand if you've already cashed a UMass over 2.5 regular season wins ticket! With back-to-back wins over FCS-level opponents the Minutemen have already surpassed oddsmakers' expectations for this season. UMass was (arguably) the worst team in college football last season, and now a win over Sacramento State would give the Minutemen some legitimate MAC Championship Game hopes. The Hornets may have taken the crown from UMass as the worst team in the sport in 2026, but no matter who you're talking about, flying across the country from Boston to Sacramento for a conference game is not something this program is accustomed to. If UMass is able to survive this trek, the Minutemen host Eastern Michigan (who just lost their top receiver to injury) next week and it's time to start thinking big after that. From a power ratings' perspective, we have this game lined in UMass' favor by more than a touchdown so the travel spot is clearly being priced into this number. The Minutemen have played some very tough teams in tough environments over the years, but UMass doesn't need to cross the Mississippi to find a game very often. You have to go back to Week 1 of the 2023 season against New Mexico State to find the last time UMass traveled anywhere near this far for a game. For what it's worth, the Minutemen did win that game against the Aggies by double digits as a seven-point 'dog in 2023. If you trust their ability to travel, this is a cheap number to grab against a program that should probably still be competing at the FCS level.
Play UMass
| Massachusetts | 36.7 / 15 | +21.7 | 46 | 45 | -8.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Sacramento State | 21.7 / 26.7 | -5 | 51 | 37 | +1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Massachusetts | 09-19 | Stonehill | -31 | 51 | 36-14 | Sacramento State | 09-19 | North Dak. | +24.5 | 50.5 | 10-31 |
| | 09-12 | Sacred He. | -23.5 | 53.5 | 37-10 | | 09-12 | @ Fresno St. | +17.5 | 43.5 | 3-49 |
| | 09-03 | @ Rutgers | +29.5 | 55 | 37-21 | | 09-05 | Miss Vall. | -38.5 | 55.5 | 52-0 |
| Massachusetts |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Rutgers | 29.5 | W | 37-21 | OV | 55 | 7.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 17.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Sacred Heart | -23.5 | W | 37-10 | UN | 53.5 | | W | 17-0 | OV | | | W | 23-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Stonehill | -31 | L | 36-14 | UN | 51 | | W | 13-7 | OV | | | W | 13-7 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sacramento State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 8.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 53 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Miss Valley State | -38.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Fresno State | 17.5 | L | 3-49 | OV | 43.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-32 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Dakota State | 24.5 | W | 10-31 | UN | 50.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 10.5 | 14.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Missouri | 27 | 58.5 | 16.5 | | 15 | 39 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +25 / +17 | -41 / -4.5 |
| Mississippi St | 38 | -3.5 | 14(3) | -5.5 | 16 | 16 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +49 / +16 | -28.5 / +1.5 |
Missouri has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings, including a 49-27 home win over the Bulldogs last year. Each of the last four meetings have gone over the total. Mississippi State is now 3-0 straight-up and against the spread following last week's impressive effort at South Carolina. In the battle of dynamic quarterbacks trying to catch the eye of NFL scouts, Kamario Taylor buried Gamecocks' QB LaNorris Sellers. Trailing 16-0 at the midway point of the second quarter, Taylor never panicked and the Bulldogs scored two touchdowns in less than three minutes to quiet Williams-Brice Stadium. If you look up "buy low, sell high" in the sports betting dictionary, it's going to look pretty similar to this market. On one side you have a high-energy team that plays a fun brand of football with a like-able quarterback that just beat a pair of Power Four opponents on the road with relative ease. On the other side, you have a Missouri team that was projected to take a step back this year, coming off a less-than-impressive showing against Troy where starting QB Austin Simmons went 11-of-20 passing for 108 yards and a touchdown. The Bulldogs and Tigers are entering this game from two different directions on the momentum meter, but we're struggling to justify Mississippi State laying more than a field goal in this matchup. Instead, we'll pivot toward the total. If the Bulldogs perform at a level that oddsmakers have promoted them to, then Mississippi State can carry most of the weight in this total. The 'Dogs have scored an average of 47.0 points per game through the first three contests, and that includes a mid-pack defense from the SEC and a mid-pack defense from the Big Ten. Recent series history between these teams doesn’t hurt either.
Play the Over
| Missouri | 39.7 / 17.3 | +22.3 | 14 | 40 | -29 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Mississippi St | 47 / 20 | +27 | 18 | 28 | -8.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Missouri | 09-19 | Troy | -26.5 | 49.5 | 27-17 | Mississippi St | 09-19 | @ South Car. | +3.5 | 60 | 41-34 |
| | 09-11 | @ Kansas | -4.5 | 51.5 | 38-21 | | 09-12 | @ Minnesota. | -1 | 53.5 | 38-13 |
| | 09-03 | Arkansas . | -55.5 | 62.5 | 54-14 | | 09-05 | UL Monroe | -28.5 | 54.5 | 62-13 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Mississippi St | 27 | 50.5 | 27 | 52/110 | 23/38/2/235 | 1/1 |
| Missouri | 49 | -7 | 17 | 39/326 | 8/16/1/112 | 1/1 |
| 11-23-24 | Missouri | 39 | -9.5 | 24 | 53/207 | 15/20/0/268 | 0/0 |
| Mississippi St | 20 | 58 | 16 | 22/147 | 16/28/0/191 | 1/1 |
| Missouri |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Arkansas Pine Bluff | -55.5 | L | 54-14 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 40-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | @ Kansas | -4.5 | W | 38-21 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | L | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Troy | -26.5 | L | 27-17 | UN | 49.5 | -7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -15 | L | 24-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mississippi St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UL Monroe | -28.5 | W | 62-13 | OV | 54.5 | -7.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 13.5 | -17 | W | 41-3 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Minnesota U | -1 | W | 38-13 | UN | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | W | 28-6 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ South Carolina | 3.5 | W | 41-34 | OV | 60 | 0.5 | L | 0-13 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 14-23 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Tennessee Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Missouri State | 10 | 59.5 | 46 | | 47 | 39 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | +14 / -50 | -6.5 / +38.5 |
| SMU | 49 | -30.5 | 15.5(2) | -32.5 | 15 | 15 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +46 / -3.5 | -32.5 / 0 |
These squads met at Missouri State last season with the Mustangs earning a 28-10 road win. The Bears comfortably stayed within the number as a four-touchdown 'dog. SMU is licking its wounds after falling at Louisville last week. That was a neck-and-neck game for most of the duration, but SMU couldn't overcome a -3 turnover differential. Running back Kendrick Raphael ran for 197 yards and three touchdowns last week against the Cardinals. Head coach Rhett Lashlee probably has his hands full from a motivation perspective this week, but there's no real worry about any kind of look-ahead. SMU resumes ACC play next week at home against Boston College followed by a bye after that, so there's not too many things on the Mustangs' horizon. Missouri State let one slip away last week against Marshall, failing to stay within the number as a small home 'dog. As a second-year program at the FBS level, Missouri State doesn't have much experience in this role. Like we mentioned, the Bears did cover against SMU last season, but they also lost by 60 against USC last year and by 50 against Texas A&M this year. So the opportunity will likely be there if Lashlee feels like his team needs to let off some steam.
| Missouri State | 24 / 31.3 | -7.3 | 47 | 34 | +8.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| SMU | 38 / 25 | +13 | 14 | 29 | -11 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Missouri State | 09-19 | Marshall | +4 | 52.5 | 24-30 | SMU | 09-19 | @ Louisville | +3 | 57.5 | 31-41 |
| | 09-12 | Lindenwood | -16.5 | 53.5 | 48-14 | | 09-12 | UC Davis | -32.5 | 59 | 56-10 |
| | 09-05 | @ Texas A&M | +38.5 | 53.5 | 0-50 | | 09-07 | @ Florida S. | -3 | 52.5 | 27-24 |
|
| 09-13-25 | SMU | 28 | -29 | 24 | 34/167 | 24/36/1/281 | 1/1 |
| Missouri State | 10 | 60 | 19 | 27/53 | 23/37/3/275 | 0/0 |
| Missouri State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Texas A&M | 38.5 | L | 0-50 | UN | 53.5 | 10.5 | W | 0-9 | UN | 14 | 24.5 | W | 0-19 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Lindenwood | -16.5 | W | 48-14 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Marshall | 4 | L | 24-30 | OV | 52.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-14-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| SMU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-0-1 |
| 09-07-26 | @ Florida State | -3 | PK | 27-24 | UN | 52.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -1.5 | W | 17-10 | P | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | UC Davis | -32.5 | W | 56-10 | OV | 59 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Louisville | 3 | L | 31-41 | OV | 57.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Colorado | 24 | 54.5 | 28.5 | | 26 | 22 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +31 / -16.5 | -38.5 / +5 |
| Baylor | 28 | -8 | 20.5(2) | -10 | 21 | 37 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +29 / - | -29 / - |
The lone meeting between the Buffaloes and Bears resulted in a 38-31 win in favor of Colorado in September 2024. This is the second leg of a road back-to-back for Coach Prime's squad after they were embarrassed in Evanston against Northwestern last week. The Buffs were caught on camera poking fun of the Purple Cats' temporary stadium (new one opens next week!), and apparently Northwestern took that personally to the tune of 41-7. Colorado has been a very tough team to trust, but almost anything you say about the Buffaloes can essentially be repeated for the Bears. Baylor earned a 36-19 home win over Louisiana Tech last week as both teams were using a back-up QB. Starter DJ Lagway is expected to return this week after missing the last two weeks due to an ankle issue. Even with Lagway's return, we have no interest in backing the Bears with a double-digit point spread. That Week 1 loss to Auburn isn't aging very well as the Tigers got smacked by Florida at home last week. This is a Baylor team that went 2-10 against the spread last season, and Lagway hasn't shown much since his impressive debut in Gainesville a few years ago. Hold your nose, but it's Colorado or pass.
Play Colorado
09/22 9:36 AM PDT — Baylor quarterback DJ Lagway is expected to return this week after missing time due to an ankle issue. Lagway has missed the Bears' last two games against Louisiana Tech and Prairie View A&M.
| Colorado | 24.3 / 25 | -0.7 | 24 | 32 | -9.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Baylor | 32 / 13 | +19 | 22 | 36 | -17 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Colorado | 09-19 | @ Northwest. | +3.5 | 48 | 7-41 | Baylor | 09-19 | Louisiana. | -20.5 | 50.5 | 36-19 |
| | 09-12 | Weber Sta. | -38.5 | 57.5 | 52-21 | | 09-12 | Prairie V. | -37.5 | 55.5 | 44-3 |
| | 09-03 | @ Georgia T. | +6.5 | 53 | 14-13 | | 09-05 | @ Auburn | +6.5 | 58.5 | 16-17 |
| Colorado |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-1-1 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Georgia Tech | 6.5 | W | 14-13 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Weber State | -38.5 | L | 52-21 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 21-7 | OV | | | W | 42-14 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Northwestern | 3.5 | L | 7-41 | P | 48 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-21 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Baylor |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Auburn | 6.5 | W | 16-17 | UN | 58.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Prairie View A&M | -37.5 | W | 44-3 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 34-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Louisiana Tech | -20.5 | L | 36-19 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -11.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tulsa | 24 | 51 | 34.5 | | 34 | 55 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | +28 / +6 | -14.5 / -12.5 |
| Arkansas | 38 | -7 | 25(2) | -11.5 | 23 | 3 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | -5.5 / -33 | -8 / +13.5 |
If you just read our Missouri-Mississippi State preview above, we put a spotlight on that buy-low-sell-high spot. If that's No. 1 on this week's list, then this game is right behind it. How much worse can things realistically get for the Razorbacks? Arkansas has been out-scored 88-27 in back-to-back losses to Utah and Georgia. After beating Alabama A&M and Arkansas State to open last season, the Hogs have gone 1-12 straight-up, 3-10 against the spread with the lone victory coming against FCS-level Northern Alabama. We're not sure if Arkansas has hit rock-bottom, but first-year head coach Ryan Silverfield probably doesn't want to find out. There are two SMALL positives pointing in Arkansas' direction heading into this non-conference matchup with Tulsa. First, the Golden Hurricane will likely be missing their starting quarterback. Baylor Hayes is not expected to return from his knee injury that kept him out of last week's tune-up against East Texas A&M. In his Monday press conference, Tulsa head coach Tre Lamb said, "He's not moving very well, as well as I thought he should be." Dexter Williams is projected to get the start for the Hurricane. Second, it certainly wasn't pretty, but Silverfield got a 60-minute effort out of his team in last week's blowout loss to Georgia on a day when fans were threatening to boycott and wear paper sacks to the stadium. Arkansas scored two touchdowns in the fourth quarter and probably should have covered the spread against the 'Dawgs if it hadn't been for some questionable foul calls. Silverfield could sleep a LITTLE easier this week, knowing he frustrated Kirby Smart in the fourth quarter of that contest and his team continued to fight. Tulsa is likely going to be a trendy underdog selection this week (and who could blame them), but we need to see a number that's a little more attractive than +7 with a back-up QB for the Golden Hurricane. Let's not forget, Tulsa was a three-touchdown 'dog against Silverfield's Memphis team last season and lost by 38. Even though things haven't clicked thus far in Fayetteville, he's working with a similar level of talent with an SEC-level budget.
Play Arkansas
09/22 9:27 AM PDT — Tulsa QB Baylor Hayes is not expected to return from his knee injury that kept him out of last week's tune-up against East Texas A&M. In his Monday press conference, Tulsa head coach Tre Lamb said, "He's not moving very well, as well as I thought he should be." Dexter Williams is projected to get the start at Arkansas.
| Tulsa | 29.7 / 9 | +20.7 | 34 | 42 | -13.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Arkansas | 19.3 / 34 | -14.7 | 22 | 24 | -1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Tulsa | 09-19 | Texas A&M. | -41 | 56.5 | 42-0 | Arkansas | 09-19 | Georgia | +24.5 | 54.5 | 17-45 |
| | 09-12 | @ Sam Houst. | -12.5 | 51.5 | 23-17 | | 09-12 | @ Utah | +13.5 | 55.5 | 10-43 |
| | 09-05 | Oklahoma . | +12.5 | 57.5 | 24-10 | | 09-05 | North Ala. | -40.5 | 63.5 | 31-14 |
| Tulsa |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Oklahoma State | 12.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 57.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 7 | W | 10-3 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Sam Houston St | -12.5 | L | 23-17 | UN | 51.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | L | 10-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Texas A&M-Commerce | -41 | W | 42-0 | UN | 56.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-01-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Alabama | -40.5 | L | 31-14 | UN | 63.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Utah | 13.5 | L | 10-43 | UN | 55.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | L | 3-29 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia | 24.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | L | 3-21 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas A&M | 27 | 52.5 | 14.5 | | 11 | 21 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | +22.7 / - | -23.5 / - |
| LSU | 31 | -8 | 8.5(3) | -9 | 8 | 9 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | +36 / -8 | -22.5 / -3 |
Interested in betting on either squad after what each of them showed last week? Ehh, not so much. From a power ratings perspective, we're struggling to justify this point spread north of a touchdown in favor of the Tigers. The bright lights of a ranked matchup in primetime have not been kind to Lane Kiffin in recent years. Per betting analyst Evan Abrams, Kiffin's teams are 4-15 straight-up, 6-13 against the spread when playing a ranked opponent at night. In his last three night games against ranked opponents, Kiffin's teams have gone 0-3 straight-up and against the spread, missing the cover by 23.5, 7 and 11 points in those respective contests. We'll dust off our Week 1 edition and rehash some of the points that we raised before the Tigers crushed Clemson in the opener (before we do that, that result against Clemson has lost plenty of luster over the last few weeks, hasn't it?). There's no doubt that Kiffin has some kind of natural desire to push buttons and cause a little chaos, but seemingly EVERYONE around the Tigers program was raising an eyebrow when he began courting players that got cut from NFL rosters during the offseason. While everyone focused on Kiffin's button-pushing persona and the lawsuits that followed, no one was really asking him why he was so aggressive in pursuing players that clearly had some massive red flags from an eligibility standpoint. Perhaps it was because he knew his roster wasn't very good. Former Arizona State QB Sam Leavitt plays with little fear on the gridiron, but that's already landed him on the injury list with some early-season concerns. Texas A&M won at Tiger Stadium last year and the Aggies have beaten LSU in three of the last four meetings, so there shouldn't be too much intimidation or feeling of awe when heading to Baton Rouge this week. Aggie QB Marcel Reed is struggling at the moment, but perhaps a trip back to the place where he had a coming-out party (four TDs last year) will get his juices flowing once again.
Play Texas A&M
09/22 9:55 AM PDT — Texas A&M wide receiver Terry Bussey will miss the rest of the regular season. Bussey had seven catches for 92 yards plus a rushing touchdown before suffering a season-ending injury in last week's loss to Kentucky.
| Texas A&M | 39.7 / 17 | +22.7 | 8 | 30 | -23.5 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| LSU | 40 / 18.7 | +21.3 | 8 | 21 | -16 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Texas A&M | 09-19 | Kentucky | -17 | 48.5 | 21-31 | LSU | 09-19 | @ Mississip. | -3 | 59 | 24-32 |
| | 09-12 | Arizona S. | -14.5 | 51.5 | 48-20 | | 09-12 | Louisiana. | -34.5 | 55 | 45-14 |
| | 09-05 | Missouri . | -38.5 | 53.5 | 50-0 | | 09-05 | Clemson | -10 | 49 | 51-10 |
|
| 10-25-25 | Texas A&M | 49 | -1.5 | 24 | 40/224 | 12/21/2/202 | 2/0 |
| LSU | 25 | 50.5 | 18 | 27/60 | 25/39/0/218 | 0/0 |
| 10-26-24 | LSU | 23 | 54.5 | 20 | 23/24 | 25/50/3/405 | 1/0 |
| Texas A&M | 38 | -2 | 17 | 49/242 | 8/20/0/134 | 1/1 |
| Texas A&M |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Missouri State | -38.5 | W | 50-0 | UN | 53.5 | -10.5 | L | 9-0 | UN | 14 | -24.5 | L | 19-0 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona State | -14.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 51.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kentucky | -17 | L | 21-31 | OV | 48.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -9.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Citadel | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| LSU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Clemson | -10 | W | 51-10 | OV | 49 | -3 | W | 17-3 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 31-3 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Louisiana Tech | -34.5 | L | 45-14 | OV | 55 | -9.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Mississippi | -3 | L | 24-32 | UN | 59 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | McNeese State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| So Mississippi | 10 | 52.5 | 48 | | 48 | 42 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | +9 / -35 | -8 / +32 |
| Tulane | 38 | -18 | 34.5(2) | -15.5 | 33 | 17 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +4 / -12.5 | -10 / +15 |
This is the first meeting between these regional rivals since Tulane earned a 21-3 road win at Southern Miss in 2023. Since mid-November of last season, the Eagles have gone 1-6 straight-up and against the spread with the lone win coming against FCS-level Alcorn State. Southern Miss QB Ethan Hampton suffered a hand injury in last week's loss to UConn and is not expected to play in this one. Senior Landry Lyddy, who has very limited experience during his five-year career, is expected to get the starting nod. Tulane returns home after suffering a 31-20 loss at Kansas State last week. We mentioned this in our Illinois-Ohio State preview because the Illini also played Duke, but Tulane's 17-3 loss to the Blue Devils is aging pretty well when you consider how well Duke has played over the first month of the season. We'll see how South Alabama looks this week against Kentucky, but Tulane's Week 2 win over the Jaguars might also look a little bit better if South Alabama can continue to put a nice season together. We tip our cap to Tulane for crafting a competitive non-conference schedule against a variety of opponents. After some tough contests to get the party started, this is where the Green Wave will get to enjoy the fruits of their labor.
Play Tulane
09/22 9:30 AM PDT — Southern Miss QB Ethan Hampton suffered a hand injury in last week's loss to UConn and is not expected to play in this one. Senior Landry Lyddy, who has very limited experience during his five-year career, is expected to get the starting nod.
| So Mississippi | 25.7 / 31.3 | -5.7 | 47 | 38 | +5.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Tulane | 17 / 24 | -7 | 32 | 27 | +6.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| So Mississippi | 09-19 | Connectic. | +3.5 | 54.5 | 20-48 | Tulane | 09-19 | @ Kansas St. | +20.5 | 50 | 20-31 |
| | 09-12 | @ Auburn | +32 | 56.5 | 8-43 | | 09-12 | South Ala. | -10 | 48 | 28-24 |
| | 09-05 | Alcorn St. | -19.5 | 51.5 | 49-3 | | 09-05 | @ Duke | +9.5 | 51.5 | 3-17 |
| So Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Alcorn State | -19.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Auburn | 32 | L | 8-43 | UN | 56.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 8-27 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Connecticut | 3.5 | L | 20-48 | OV | 54.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 12.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-27 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-06-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tulane |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-2-1 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-1-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Duke | 9.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 51.5 | 3 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | South Alabama | -10 | L | 28-24 | OV | 48 | -3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | -6.5 | L | 14-10 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas State | 20.5 | W | 20-31 | OV | 50 | 5.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sam Houston St | 10 | 55.5 | 44 | | 47 | 55 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +26.5 / -3 | -4.5 / +15.5 |
| Texas Tech | 42 | -34.5 | 10(3) | -37 | 9 | 18 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +12.5 / +11 | -26.5 / -26 |
After a disastrous tenure as Wisconsin's offensive coordinator when the Badgers couldn't keep a quarterback healthy, we weren't sure where the coaching path would take veteran offensive mind Phil Longo. The answer was Sam Houston State, and after a difficult 2-10 debut season where the Bearkats couldn't play home games on campus, Longo has Sam Houston poised for a quick turnaround. The 'Kats are 3-0 against the spread this season, covering as a 'dog against Troy and Tulsa to open the year before smashing FCS-level Nicholls 59-0 last week. Longo struggled to find a reliable QB when he was in Madison, but it appears that he found one in Landyn Locke. The 6-foot-4 sophomore has nine touchdown passes with just one interception thus far. A wave of early money has shown on Sam Houston once again, and while we agree with it in principle, we're a little more interested in the under. Two of Texas Tech's first three games have gone over the total, but there's been plenty of silliness in those results. The Red Raiders and Oregon State were tied 0-0 at the halfway point of the second quarter before Beavers' receiver Jesse Legree began torching Texas Tech's defense. Last week against Houston, the Cougars scored with 49 seconds remaining to push the final score over the closing total. Our biggest worry for Locke is sacks after he was sacked a total of nine times against Tulsa and Troy. If the Trojans and Golden Hurricane are getting that much pressure on you, surely Texas Tech's defensive line will enjoy some success. We expect the Bearkats to have some down-to-down success, but those sacks can kill a drive in a hurry.
Play the Under
| Sam Houston St | 32.3 / 15.7 | +16.7 | 49 | 42 | +2.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Texas Tech | 32 / 20 | +12 | 8 | 36 | -26.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Sam Houston St | 09-19 | Nicholls . | -21 | 51 | 59-0 | Texas Tech | 09-18 | Houston U | -8 | 52.5 | 28-26 |
| | 09-12 | Tulsa | +12.5 | 51.5 | 17-23 | | 09-12 | @ Oregon St. | -26 | 52.5 | 35-24 |
| | 09-05 | @ Troy | +15.5 | 52.5 | 21-24 | | 09-05 | Abilene C. | -45 | 60.5 | 33-10 |
| Sam Houston St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Troy | 15.5 | W | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 9.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Tulsa | 12.5 | W | 17-23 | UN | 51.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | W | 14-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Nicholls State | -21 | W | 59-0 | OV | 51 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-14-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-21-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Abilene Christian | -45 | L | 33-10 | UN | 60.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Oregon State | -26 | L | 35-24 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -14.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-18-26 | Houston U | -8 | L | 28-26 | OV | 52.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 14-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Vanderbilt | 20 | 54.5 | 18 | | 18 | 21 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | +10.7 / - | -17.5 / - |
| Auburn | 26 | -10 | 16(3) | -5 | 16 | 14 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +15 / - | -15 / - |
Vanderbilt has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings, including a 45-38 overtime win in Nashville last season. Entering last week's game against NC State, anyone that had a ticket to FirstBank Stadium thought there was a chance they'd be witnessing history. Five-star freshman QB Jared Curtis was making his first college start, and the black-and-gold faithful wanted a look at the highest-rated recruit in program history. Well, they saw history, but it wasn't what they were expecting. Curtis turned the ball over three times and struggled for large portions of that contest, but no one will remember it after the Commodores pulled off one of the most-improbable victories of all time. It's cliche, but Vandy head coach Clark Lea had his team ready for every possible scenario last week, and they kicked down the door with one second left after the Wolfpack left it cracked with a sliver of daylight. Former Heisman finalist Diego Pavia drew most of the headlines in Music City over the past few years, but Lea simply knows how to coach. Since the beginning of the 2024 season, Vanderbilt is 12-3 against the spread as an underdog with eight outright upset victories. Asking a freshman QB to hang tough at Jordan-Hare is a tall task, but you're not going to find a team that's better prepared for any situation than Vanderbilt.
Play Vanderbilt
| Vanderbilt | 32.7 / 22 | +10.7 | 17 | 39 | -17.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| Auburn | 33 / 22.7 | +10.3 | 16 | 27 | -12 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Vanderbilt | 09-19 | NC State | -3 | 50.5 | 35-31 | Auburn | 09-19 | Florida | +2.5 | 53.5 | 39-44 |
| | 09-12 | Delaware | -20.5 | 53.5 | 35-26 | | 09-12 | So Missis. | -32 | 56.5 | 43-8 |
| | 09-05 | Austin Pe. | -28.5 | 57.5 | 28-9 | | 09-05 | Baylor | -6.5 | 58.5 | 17-16 |
|
| 11-08-25 | Auburn | 38 | 47 | 34 | 36/210 | 31/46/0/353 | 2/0 |
| Vanderbilt | 45 | -6 | 30 | 36/167 | 25/33/0/377 | 1/1 |
| 11-02-24 | Vanderbilt | 17 | 48 | 12 | 38/84 | 9/23/0/143 | 0/0 |
| Auburn | 7 | -8 | 14 | 29/88 | 20/29/0/239 | 1/1 |
| Vanderbilt |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Austin Peay | -28.5 | L | 28-9 | UN | 57.5 | | L | 5-6 | OV | | | W | 15-9 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Delaware | -20.5 | L | 35-26 | OV | 53.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -11.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | NC State | -3 | W | 35-31 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Auburn |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Baylor | -6.5 | L | 17-16 | UN | 58.5 | -1.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | So Mississippi | -32 | W | 43-8 | UN | 56.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 27-8 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida | 2.5 | L | 39-44 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Samford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Colorado State | 16 | 56.5 | 36 | | 38 | 12 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 | +12.7 / - | -2 / - |
| Tex San Antonio | 34 | -14 | 28(2) | -10 | 28 | 4 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 | +29 / -9.5 | -28 / +16 |
Just when things seemed to be looking up for Jim Mora at Colorado State, his Oklahoma State transfer QB Hauss Hejny pulled a hamstring early in last week’s game vs. BYU and will rate as an iffy participant until further notice. Hejny, who thrives on the move in the sort of short-window plays that Mora’s new offense is stressing in Fort Collins, would figure to be less than effective in that style if his mobility is hampered at all. So the Rams might have to live for a bit with one of their backup QBs (maybe K’Saan Farrar, who followed Mora from UConn but couldn’t get the ball downfield before getting poked in the eye vs BYU, or sophomore holdover Darius Curry, who completed a couple of TD drives in garbage time last week). While Mora contemplates what he might or might not have to do short-term with his QB situation, there’s not much question for UTSA counterpart Jeff Traylor with southpaw Owen McCown in his third year as the starter for the Roadrunners. McCown is looking forward to a chance to breathe a bit at the Alamodome after getting precious little time to do any of that last weekend up the road in Austin vs. Steve Sarkisian’s top-ranked Longhorns. McCown figures to have more of a chance vs. the Colorado State defense that was battered into submission by Kalani Sitake’s offense that piled up almost 560 yards last week, including a whopping 332 on the ground. Thus, McCown’s preferred play-action with slashing RB Will Henderson III (almost seven yards per carry since last season) should function much better this week, and note the Roadrunners are now working on spread covers in each of their first three games this season and six of seven dating back to the end of the 2025 campaign - all with McCown at the controls. Meanwhile, Traylor’s defense limited Longhorn big plays last week when the longest Texas gainer traveled only 24 yards. Various portal transfers have quickly stepped into featured roles on the Roadrunner stop unit. The host Roadrunners are on a positive 14-6 uptick vs. the spread since late in the 2024 campaign, including an 8-3 ATS mark in the last 11 games as a favorite.
Play UTSA
09/22 9:40 AM PDT — Colorado State QB Hauss Hejny is questionable after suffering a hamstring injury in last week's loss to BYU.
| Colorado State | 38.7 / 26 | +12.7 | 38 | 35 | -2 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 |
| Tex San Antonio | 27.3 / 24 | +3.3 | 28 | 30 | +1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Colorado State | 09-19 | BYU | +17.5 | 55 | 23-41 | Tex San Antonio | 09-19 | @ Texas | +30 | 58.5 | 6-30 |
| | 09-12 | Southern . | -20.5 | 57.5 | 58-24 | | 09-12 | @ Texas Sta. | +1.5 | 65.5 | 31-26 |
| | 09-05 | Wyoming | -2.5 | 46 | 35-13 | | 09-05 | UT Rio Gr. | -28 | 59.5 | 45-16 |
|
| 09-20-25 | Tex San Antonio | 17 | -5.5 | 13 | 33/172 | 14/27/2/173 | 1/0 |
| Colorado State | 16 | 58.5 | 20 | 37/153 | 24/38/0/254 | 1/0 |
| Colorado State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Wyoming | -2.5 | W | 35-13 | OV | 46 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9 | -0.5 | W | 14-6 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern Utah | -20.5 | W | 58-24 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 17-7 | OV | | | W | 48-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | BYU | 17.5 | L | 23-41 | OV | 55 | 4.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 11.5 | 9.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tex San Antonio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UT Rio Grande Valley | -28 | W | 45-16 | OV | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas State | 1.5 | W | 31-26 | UN | 65.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 14 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas | 30 | W | 6-30 | UN | 58.5 | 7.5 | W | 3-10 | UN | 13.5 | 18 | W | 3-20 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Carolina | 24 | 53 | 19.5 | | 17 | 18 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | +28.7 / - | -28 / - |
| Alabama | 38 | -11.5 | 6(3) | -16.5 | 7 | 19 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | +26 / +28 | -23 / -9 |
South Carolina has covered the spread as a double-digit 'dog in each of the last three meetings, losing by two in Tuscaloosa in 2024 and losing by a touchdown last year in Columbia. Each of the last four meetings in this series have gone over the total. With a schedule that includes games against Mississippi State, Alabama, Florida, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Texas A&M, Georgia and Clemson, things were never going to be easy for Gamecocks' head coach Shane Beamer in 2026. Well in fairness to Beamer, he didn't know he'd have to play Mother Nature, too. South Carolina's first three games have all been delayed or featured interruptions because of inclement weather thus far. Beamer's been dealt a tough hand, but the writing on the wall is getting larger. Williams-Brice Stadium is undergoing a three-phase $350 million renovation, and it's hard to ask the Gamecock faithful to fund that project with the product that Beamer has put on the field. After missing each of the first two games, star defensive end Dylan Stewart didn't make much of an impact in last week's home loss to Mississippi State. If motivation and distractions are becoming an issue for the Gamecocks, that's more likely to appear on the defensive end. Alabama's first three games have all gone over the total as the Tide find their stride under Keelon Russell. Alabama has scored an average of 47.7 points per game against East Carolina, Kentucky and Florida State thus far. South Carolina's defense just allowed 41 points at home to Mississippi State last week, so the Gamecocks' best chance to slow down Alabama might be to hope for another lightning delay.
Play the Over
| South Carolina | 45.3 / 16.7 | +28.7 | 16 | 40 | -28 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| Alabama | 47.7 / 21 | +26.7 | 7 | 24 | -18.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| South Carolina | 09-19 | Mississip. | -3.5 | 60 | 34-41 | Alabama | 09-19 | Florida S. | -18 | 50.5 | 50-36 |
| | 09-12 | Towson | -44.5 | 57.5 | 45-9 | | 09-12 | @ Kentucky | -9 | 47.5 | 45-17 |
| | 09-05 | Kent State | -35.5 | 53 | 57-0 | | 09-05 | East Caro. | -28 | 52.5 | 48-10 |
|
| 10-25-25 | Alabama | 29 | -12.5 | 17 | 23/72 | 24/43/0/253 | 2/2 |
| South Carolina | 22 | 48 | 18 | 37/111 | 18/33/1/222 | 1/1 |
| 10-12-24 | South Carolina | 25 | 50 | 23 | 39/132 | 24/32/1/242 | 3/3 |
| Alabama | 27 | -21 | 20 | 38/104 | 16/23/2/209 | 1/0 |
| South Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Kent State | -35.5 | W | 57-0 | OV | 53 | -9.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21 | W | 29-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Towson | -44.5 | L | 45-9 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Mississippi St | -3.5 | L | 34-41 | OV | 60 | -0.5 | W | 13-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 23-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | East Carolina | -28 | W | 48-10 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -16.5 | W | 38-7 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kentucky | -9 | W | 45-17 | OV | 47.5 | -3 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -5.5 | L | 13-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida State | -18 | L | 50-36 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 26-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Chattanooga | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida Atlantic | 34 | -12 | 35.5 | -14.5 | 36 | 42 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +7 / -45 | -0.5 / +25.5 |
| UL Monroe | 21 | 58 | 51(1) | | 50 | 55 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | -3 / -27.5 | -9.5 / +19 |
This is the first meeting between the Owls and WarHawks since October 2012. Florida Atlantic is coming off a pair of nice under-the-radar wins over Navy and Florida International. Obviously, losing to Florida by 45 points in Week 1 was not ideal, but at least the Owls can take a little bit of solace in the fact that Florida has also crushed its last two opponents. Monroe has lost 11-straight games, including a loss to FCS-level Southeast Louisiana last week as a 9.5-point home favorite. The WarHawks trailed by 18 in the fourth quarter before rallying in the final minutes to make the final score look a little more respectable. Southeast Louisiana scored touchdowns off a 78-yard punt return and an 11-yard interception return. From a numbers' perspective, we're in line with where this game has opened. Monroe probably isn't QUITE as bad as the WarHawks looked last week, but we're not willing to put actual dollars behind that opinion.
| Florida Atlantic | 25 / 35.3 | -10.3 | 37 | 29 | +8.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| UL Monroe | 22.7 / 42 | -19.3 | 49 | 38 | +9.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Florida Atlantic | 09-19 | Florida I. | -5 | 62.5 | 16-10 | UL Monroe | 09-19 | SE Louisi. | -9.5 | 48.5 | 35-38 |
| | 09-12 | Navy | +4.5 | 59.5 | 38-30 | | 09-12 | @ UAB | +9 | 53.5 | 20-26 |
| | 09-05 | @ Florida | +25.5 | 59.5 | 21-66 | | 09-05 | @ Mississip. | +28.5 | 54.5 | 13-62 |
| Florida Atlantic |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Florida | 25.5 | L | 21-66 | OV | 59.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | L | 14-38 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Navy | 4.5 | W | 38-30 | OV | 59.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | 3 | W | 31-7 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida Intl | -5 | W | 16-10 | UN | 62.5 | -1.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | PK | 10-7 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Texas Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UL Monroe |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-0-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Mississippi St | 28.5 | L | 13-62 | OV | 54.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 13.5 | 17 | L | 3-41 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ UAB | 9 | W | 20-26 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13 | 6 | W | 17-10 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | SE Louisiana | -9.5 | L | 35-38 | OV | 48.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | L | 13-24 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah | 34 | -7.5 | 12 | -11 | 13 | 40 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | +39.3 / - | -26 / - |
| Iowa State | 23 | 46.5 | 26(3) | | 27 | 45 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +38 / -3 | -26 / +14 |
The Cyclones and Utes have only met one time since becoming conference foes as Iowa State upset Utah in Salt Lake City in November 2024. A wave of early money on Iowa State has pushed this point spread into the single digits, but we agreed with the oddsmakers' opening number closer to -10. Unless there's an under-the-radar injury that we are unaware of, we're certainly not looking to fade the Utes any time soon. Utah is 9-0 straight-up, 7-2 against the spread over its last nine games and one of those point spread losses came by a half-point (beat Kansas by ten as a 10.5-point favorite last November). Utah has out-scored its first three opponents by a combined margin of 142-24 so far this season with three-straight covers as a double-digit favorite. We tip our cap to first-year head coach Jimmy Rogers for the job that he's done in Ames thus far, but how much credit should we be giving for the Cyclones' wins against Southeast Missouri State and Bowling Green?! Utah's wins over Arkansas and Utah State hold significantly more weight compared to those results. Ames is never a fun place for an opponent to play, but take a look at what the Utes did on the road last season. Utah beat UCLA by 33, beat Wyoming by 25, beat West Virginia by 34, beat Baylor by 27 and beat Kansas by ten. Any fears about the Utes traveling from west to east should be put to bed pretty quickly. Our numbers aren't off-market by very much, but we're struggling to see the early-week love for the Cyclones.
Play Utah
| Utah | 47.3 / 8 | +39.3 | 14 | 38 | -26 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Iowa State | 35.3 / 11 | +24.3 | 28 | 39 | -12.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Utah | 09-19 | Utah State | -26.5 | 55.5 | 33-0 | Iowa State | 09-19 | Bowling G. | -22.5 | 43.5 | 55-7 |
| | 09-12 | Arkansas | -13.5 | 55.5 | 43-10 | | 09-12 | @ Iowa | +14 | 42.5 | 13-16 |
| | 09-03 | Idaho | -38 | 60.5 | 66-14 | | 09-05 | SE Missou. | -29.5 | 52.5 | 38-10 |
|
| 11-23-24 | Iowa State | 31 | -6.5 | 25 | 38/123 | 21/39/1/282 | 1/1 |
| Utah | 28 | 42.5 | 9 | 28/95 | 13/17/0/129 | 1/1 |
| Utah |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Idaho | -38 | W | 66-14 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | W | 17-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Arkansas | -13.5 | W | 43-10 | UN | 55.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | W | 29-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Utah State | -26.5 | W | 33-0 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | W | 16-0 | OV | 13.5 | -15.5 | W | 26-0 | UN | 30 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Missouri St | -29.5 | L | 38-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Iowa | 14 | W | 13-16 | UN | 42.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Bowling Green | -22.5 | W | 55-7 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | W | 35-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/22 9:09 pm |
| Oregon | 43 | -3.5 | 5.5 | -6 | 4 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | +45.5 / -8 | -42 / -24 |
| USC | 32 | 60.5 | 13.5(2) | | 11 | 31 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 1-0 | +24.7 / +7 | -30 / -21 |
Tired, apparently, of simply pulling the wings off of houseflies for fun, the Ducks decided to bully something more formidable last week, though Portland State might not qualify as a significantly greater challenge. Still, 84-0 is 84-0, and if Dan Lanning thought his team needed to napalm some foe, any foe, to get back its swagger, perhaps it was job well done last Friday vs. the overmatched Vikings. We trust USC puts up more of a fight here, though after watching the Louisiana Ragin’ Cajuns and then Rutgers (Rutgers?) move up and down the field the past two weeks vs. the SC defense, scoring a combined 65 points in the process, it’s worth wondering if Lincoln Riley’s back-to-the-future hire of vet Gary Patterson (who had been out of on-field coaching for five years) to coordinate the defense might have been as ill-advised as some of his doubters, us included, surmised in the summer. True, Oregon was turned inside-out by Oklahoma State’s full-throttle attack two weeks ago, and the Ducks might be missing recent defensive coordinator Tosh Lupoi (now head coach at his alma mater Cal), but the defining matchup here is likely on the other side of the line of scrimmage, as we get the feeling even Portland State might be able to move on this Trojan defense which looks as much an Achilles Heel for Riley as most of his other recent soft editions. Keep in mind that Ducks’ QB Dante Moore has still yet to toss a pick in three starts this season and torched the Trojans last November in a 42-27 Oregon cruise at Eugene when the Ducks seemed like they were in second gear and still piled up almost 450 yards of offense. Big Ten sources also suggest that new OC Drew Mehringer, who was promoted from within after Will Stein took the head coaching job at Kentucky, is fully capable of pushing the right buttons with a strike force returning much of the firepower (including Moore) from one of last year’s most-potent attacks. We’d rather trust recent history that suggests Riley's defense will let him down again, and why he doesn’t win these sorts of important conference games at USC, even with QB Jayden Maiava (12 TD passes already) and the USC attack likely to do plenty of business of its own. USC is just 4-11 vs. the line since early last season. Riley's Trojans are also just 4-6 vs. the spread in their last ten as an underdog.
Play the Over
09/22 9:26 AM PDT — Good news, bad news on the Ducks' side. Tight end Jamari Johnson is expected to play in this one after missing last week's game against Portland State. Wide receiver Jeremiah McClellan suffered a broken foot during pregame warmups and is expected to miss several weeks.
| Oregon | 49.7 / 22 | +27.7 | 4 | 34 | -36 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| USC | 43.3 / 21.7 | +21.7 | 11 | 32 | -24.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Oregon | 09-18 | Portland . | -58.5 | 71.5 | 84-0 | USC | 09-19 | @ Rutgers | -21 | 58.5 | 42-35 |
| | 09-12 | @ Oklahoma . | -24 | 55.5 | 31-39 | | 09-12 | Louisiana | -30.5 | 59 | 49-30 |
| | 09-05 | Boise Sta. | -25.5 | 53 | 34-27 | | 09-04 | Fresno St. | -22.5 | 51.5 | 39-0 |
|
| 11-22-25 | USC | 27 | 59.5 | 23 | 27/61 | 26/44/2/330 | 1/0 |
| Oregon | 42 | -10.5 | 26 | 40/180 | 22/30/1/257 | 1/0 |
| Oregon |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Boise State | -25.5 | L | 34-27 | OV | 53 | -7 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -14.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Oklahoma State | -24 | L | 31-39 | OV | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | L | 17-24 | OV | 30 |
| 09-18-26 | Portland St | -58.5 | W | 84-0 | OV | 71.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 49-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| USC |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:0-3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | San Jose State | -37 | L | 42-26 | OV | 61 | -10 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14 | -23.5 | W | 28-0 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | Fresno State | -22.5 | W | 39-0 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | PK | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 30-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Louisiana | -30.5 | L | 49-30 | OV | 59 | -7.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rutgers | -21 | L | 42-35 | OV | 58.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | L | 20-14 | OV | 31 |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Mexico | 29 | -11.5 | 27 | -17 | 29 | 9 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +47 / -8 | -27 / +21.5 |
| New Mexico State | 13 | 47.5 | 46(2) | | 46 | 36 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | +37 / -13.5 | -29 / +19.5 |
It’s not quite the sort of “Land of Dis-Enchantment” clashes as many of these all-New Mexico battles have been in recent years. Not with the Lobos now the best thing in Albuquerque aside from the green chile cheeseburgers at the Owl Café, or since portly head coach Jason Eck arrived from Idaho and began to entertain the masses with not only his quotes but an upgraded brand of UNM football that continues to overachieve and put a legit scare into Oklahoma last week at Norman. All of that this month minus dual-threat QB Jack Layne, whose preseason arm injury has merely given Eck the chance to rotate a better runner (sophomore Toa Fa'avae) and better passer (Oregon transfer Luke Moga) to effectively keep opposing defenses off balance. Lest we think it’s all on offense where the Lobos are making their mark, the defense is performing like it has been lifted from the well-guarded perimeter of the White Sands Missile Range while allowing only 9 points per game after stonewalling the Sooners’ ground game last weekend (only 69 rushing yards and 1.8 yards per carry allowed...imagine Barry Switzer's reaction?). Sooners’ QB John Mateer was goaded into throwing a couple of picks. Granted, the Aggies aren’t about the roll over at home for their uppity (so they think at NMSU) in-state rival, especially now that Tony Sanchez looks to have the best QB in Las Cruces since Diego Pavia as Furman transfer Trey Hedden hasn’t been afraid to push the ball downfield. Though his bravado did result in a couple of key interceptions in the recent loss at Hawaii, and the Aggies couldn’t keep pace in this rivalry matchup last September when Eck’s pressure defense harassed then-NMSU QB Logan Fife into nine sacks as the Lobos won in a 38-20 breeze at home. Have Sanchez and his team really closed the gap since? Since New Mexico head coach Jason Eck arrived from Idaho last season, the Lobos have recorded a sparkling 11-4 mark vs. the spread.
Play New Mexico
| New Mexico | 38 / 9.3 | +28.7 | 30 | 35 | -10.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| New Mexico State | 29 / 25.7 | +3.3 | 45 | 36 | +3 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| New Mexico | 09-19 | @ Oklahoma | +21.5 | 45.5 | 6-14 | New Mexico State | 09-12 | @ Hawaii | +7.5 | 50.5 | 19-29 |
| | 09-12 | Mercyhurst | -42.5 | 54.5 | 70-7 | | 09-05 | Mercyhurst | -29 | 52.5 | 51-14 |
| | 09-05 | Central M. | -11 | 47.5 | 38-7 | | 08-29 | @ Florida S. | +31 | 53.5 | 17-34 |
|
| 09-27-25 | New Mexico State | 20 | 53.5 | 16 | 30/15 | 21/38/1/289 | 1/0 |
| New Mexico | 38 | -16.5 | 24 | 37/133 | 24/31/0/344 | 2/2 |
| 09-28-24 | New Mexico | 50 | -9.5 | 28 | 49/331 | 13/28/0/248 | 1/0 |
| New Mexico State | 40 | 54 | 27 | 35/285 | 13/29/0/189 | 1/0 |
| New Mexico |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Central Michigan | -11 | W | 38-7 | UN | 47.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Mercyhurst | -42.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 54.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Oklahoma | 21.5 | W | 6-14 | UN | 45.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 12.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Mexico State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Florida State | 31 | W | 17-34 | UN | 53.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 18.5 | W | 7-17 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Mercyhurst | -29 | W | 51-14 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 13-7 | OV | | | W | 23-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Hawaii | 7.5 | L | 19-29 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-9 | UN | 10 | 4 | L | 13-19 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-01-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Central Michigan | 14 | 52 | 45 | | 44 | 42 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | +8.5 / -31 | -8.5 / +11 |
| Miami Florida | 49 | -41 | 4.5(2) | -42.5 | 5 | 24 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +70 / +26 | -59.5 / -22.5 |
Can lightning strike twice?! Central Michigan nearly beat Miami as a 30.5-point 'dog in September 2019. The Chippewas enjoyed a 22-18 advantage in first downs in that contest and held the ball for nearly 33 minutes before eventually losing by five. It's a good thing that Miami's boosters have emptied their check books in recent years because Mario Cristobal will likely have to dig deep into this roster over the course of the season. The 'Canes entered last week with some major concerns in the defensive backfield where Miami was missing three starters. The 'Canes left last week's game against Wake Forest with a whole different slew of problems. Running back Marty Brown and wide receiver Joshua Moore will both miss the rest of the season due to injuries. Wide receiver Malachi Toney, defensive linemen Ahmad Moten, linebacker Ezekiel Marcelin Jr. and running back Mark Fletcher Jr. all suffered injuries against the Demon Deacons. Toney, Fletcher and Moten are all expected to be fine in the long-run, but Marcelin Jr. will miss the next few weeks with a leg injury. Miami plays at Clemson next week, so while the Tigers are down and don't figure to play much of a factor in the ACC this season, they went to overtime last time they stepped on the field together. Cristobal has his hands full with simply keeping the roster together this week, let alone gameplanning for Central Michigan. It's not widely available, but the opening first half point spread is Miami -24.5 at some 'books. We wouldn't mind taking a shot with the Chipps in the first half, hoping to grind as much of that clock as possible over the course of a drive or two. Miami's talent will prevail over the course of 60 minutes, but with a point spread this high, all it takes is a couple first downs and minimal mistakes with a run-heavy offense to eat some time off the clock.
Play Central Michigan 1H
| Central Michigan | 14.7 / 19.3 | -4.7 | 44 | 43 | -2 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Miami Florida | 51.7 / 11 | +40.7 | 5 | 36 | -34.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Central Michigan | 09-19 | Wyoming | +1.5 | 40 | 24-10 | Miami Florida | 09-18 | @ Wake Fore. | -20 | 55.5 | 33-20 |
| | 09-12 | Colgate | -18.5 | 49.5 | 13-10 | | 09-10 | Florida A. | -59.5 | 66.5 | 77-7 |
| | 09-05 | @ New Mexico | +11 | 47.5 | 7-38 | | 09-04 | @ Stanford | -24.5 | 46.5 | 45-6 |
| Central Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ New Mexico | 11 | L | 7-38 | UN | 47.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Colgate | -18.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 49.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 0-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Wyoming | 1.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 40 | 0 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 19.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miami Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Stanford | -24.5 | W | 45-6 | OV | 46.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | -14 | W | 28-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-10-26 | Florida A&M | -59.5 | W | 77-7 | OV | 66.5 | -16.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 17.5 | -36.5 | W | 49-0 | OV | 38.5 |
| 09-18-26 | @ Wake Forest | -20 | L | 33-20 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -11 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kennesaw State | 20 | 53 | 43 | | 42 | 12 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 | +16.5 / -33 | -14.5 / +35 |
| Arkansas St | 31 | -6.5 | 38.5(1) | -5.5 | 39 | 19 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +45 / -21 | -31.5 / +15 |
Kennesaw State earned a 28-21 home win over the RedWolves last season. Former Owls QB Amari Odom (now at Syracuse) had one of the best games of his college career, throwing for 308 yards and adding 101 more on the ground. Both teams are coming off blowout losses to superior teams. Kennesaw fell at Tennessee last week while Arkansas State struggled with TCU. Our numbers are in line with where this game has opened, but we're inclined to side with the Sun Belt entry. As the college football landscape begins to shift and the transfer portal dominates offseason discussion, it's simply going to be hard for a team like Kennesaw State to maintain momentum off a conference championship-winning season. Anybody that saw playing time for the Owls last year with NCAA eligibility remaining was wooed by a bigger program in the offseason. When it comes to talent acquisition, the Sun Belt is a clear step above Conference-USA at the moment. In 247Sports' composite talent ratings (freshmen recruits plus incoming transfers), Arkansas State attracted the No. 83 class while Kennesaw sits at 119. The Owls already lost to another Sun Belt entry earlier this season, falling at home to Georgia State in Week 2. Arkansas State is a tough team to trust (especially as a favorite), but from a talent perspective, the RedWolves are a notch above the Owls.
Play Arkansas State
| Kennesaw State | 24.3 / 24.3 | 0 | 42 | 39 | +2 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Arkansas St | 27.7 / 26.7 | +1 | 39 | 33 | -0.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Kennesaw State | 09-19 | @ Tennessee. | +35 | 60 | 9-42 | Arkansas St | 09-19 | @ TCU | +19 | 56.5 | 7-31 |
| | 09-12 | Georgia S. | -7.5 | 55.5 | 17-31 | | 09-12 | WEST GEOR. | -31.5 | 56.5 | 52-7 |
| | 09-03 | WEST GEOR. | -21.5 | 50.5 | 47-0 | | 09-05 | @ Memphis | +10.5 | 52.5 | 24-42 |
|
| 09-20-25 | Arkansas St | 21 | -4.5 | 18 | 28/92 | 25/41/0/226 | 1/1 |
| Kennesaw State | 28 | 58 | 30 | 46/199 | 25/34/0/308 | 3/2 |
| Kennesaw State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-03-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -21.5 | W | 47-0 | UN | 50.5 | 0 | W | 19-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 40-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia State | -7.5 | L | 17-31 | UN | 55.5 | -2.5 | L | 3-6 | UN | 12.5 | -4.5 | L | 3-21 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Tennessee U | 35 | W | 9-42 | UN | 60 | 9.5 | L | 3-15 | OV | 14.5 | 21.5 | W | 3-21 | UN | 34 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-07-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-14-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Memphis | 10.5 | L | 24-42 | OV | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-21 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -31.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 56.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ TCU | 19 | L | 7-31 | UN | 56.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 10.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Middle Tenn St | 23 | 50.5 | 46.5 | | 48 | 40 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 | +15.5 / -2 | -9.5 / +11.5 |
| Jacksonville St | 34 | -7 | 36.5(2) | -12 | 37 | 38 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 1-1 | +23 / -14 | -13 / +4 |
Jacksonville State has won each of the last three meetings since the Gamecocks were promoted from the FCS level in 2023. Jacksonville State earned a 24-21 road win last year after trailing by a touchdown entering the fourth quarter. Both teams are coming off encouraging wins last week as the Blue Raiders upset Nevada as a 3.5-point 'dog, while the Gamecocks earned another come-from-behind win over Georgia Southern. MTSU has quietly gone 4-1 straight-up, 5-0 against the spread dating back to the final weeks of last season. Each of the Blue Raiders' first three games have stayed under the total. The Gamecocks have developed a notable home-road split over the past few seasons, and we're interested in jumping aboard for this matchup. Since the beginning of last season, Jacksonville State is 7-1 straight-up, 6-2 against the spread at home while going 4-6 straight-up, 3-7 against the spread away from home. The Gamecocks fell behind 17-0 at Georgia State last week before a furious rally in the final minutes. That should be enough to help veteran coach Charles Kelly keep his team focused and motivated through out the week. In his weekly press conference, Kelly even quoted his former boss Nick Saban, telling his team they needed to stay away from the "rat poison" this week. If his Gamecocks respond half as well as Saban's Tide used to, Kelly will be just fine this weekend.
Play Jacksonville State
| Middle Tenn St | 30.3 / 20.7 | +9.7 | 48 | 44 | -2.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Jacksonville St | 35.7 / 21 | +14.7 | 38 | 44 | -8 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Middle Tenn St | 09-19 | Nevada | +3.5 | 50.5 | 27-20 | Jacksonville St | 09-19 | Georgia S. | -3.5 | 51.5 | 31-27 |
| | 09-12 | @ Marshall | +11.5 | 56 | 26-28 | | 09-12 | @ Ohio | +1.5 | 49 | 27-29 |
| | 09-05 | Murray St. | -22.5 | 55.5 | 38-14 | | 09-05 | Eastern K. | -22.5 | 51.5 | 49-7 |
|
| 10-29-25 | Jacksonville St | 24 | -4 | 26 | 49/143 | 15/21/0/215 | 0/0 |
| Middle Tenn St | 21 | 54.5 | 30 | 22/84 | 23/45/1/235 | 1/0 |
| 10-23-24 | Middle Tenn St | 20 | 64.5 | 17 | 21/67 | 36/25/0/297 | 0/0 |
| Jacksonville St | 42 | -20.5 | 30 | 55/438 | 18/10/0/137 | 1/1 |
| Middle Tenn St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Murray State | -22.5 | W | 38-14 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Marshall | 11.5 | W | 26-28 | UN | 56 | 5.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | W | 13-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Nevada | 3.5 | W | 27-20 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-13-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Jacksonville St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ North Dakota State | 6.5 | L | 7-33 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 3.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Eastern Kentucky | -22.5 | W | 49-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Ohio | 1.5 | L | 27-29 | OV | 49 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10 | 0.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia Southern | -3.5 | W | 31-27 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-07-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-13-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Troy | 24 | 48 | 38 | | 38 | 14 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 | +10 / -10 | -19.5 / +26.5 |
| Utah State | 19 | -3 | 39.5(3) | -1.5 | 40 | 13 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 | -12 / -17.5 | -15.5 / +27.5 |
Bronco Mendenhall’s Utah State would have been far better off playing Indiana's non-conference schedule, as nationally-ranked Washington and Utah defenses proved an unfair match for a re-tooled Aggies’ offense that was going to be searching for an identity no matter who was on the slate in the first three weeks. Thanks to these matchups and breaking in a pair of new QBs who tossed four picks between them in the opener vs. Idaho State, the Aggies attack has had a schizophrenic look not too unlike the Chicago Bears of the early 70s when QB Bobby Douglass ran a fire-drill offense and set an NFL record for rushing yards by a QB. Thus far in 2026, however, the Utah State infantry has consisted of QBs Grady Brosterhous (mostly) and McCae Hillstead scrambling for their lives out of the pocket and accounting for more than half of the Aggies’ rushing attempts between them while the RBs have more resembled Electric Football players and gaining barely three yards per carry. Granted, Troy is probably down a notch or two on the stop end from the Huskies and Utes, but maybe not that much after the Trojans just put a pretty good scare into a nationally-ranked Missouri from the SEC, with another salty defense that should once again rank among the Sun Belt’s best allowing the Tigers barely 200 yards of offense. Indeed, if not for a flurry of quick-strike Mizzou TDs in the second quarter thanks to a punt return and two very short fields after Trojan turnovers, the outcome could have been much different in Columbia. As long as he can stay healthy (knock on wood), Troy's one-time West Virginia transfer QB Goose Crowder has been a rather effective on-field pilot, with 24 TD passes and just 6 interceptions in his injury-marked career, while transfer running backs Gavin Griffin (juco) and Jaheim Merriweather (via Purdue; 6.9 yards per carry) are providing a functional infantry diversion. Last week’s effort vs. Missouri suggests that Gerad Parker’s visitors might be among the more-capable Group of 6 entries. Do the oddsmakers maybe have the wrong favorite in Logan? The road-warrior Trojans have covered seven of their last eight as a visitor since last season, as well as seven of their last nine when made an underdog.
Play Troy
| Troy | 25 / 21.7 | +3.3 | 39 | 40 | -4 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Utah State | 10.3 / 26 | -15.7 | 41 | 27 | +13 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Troy | 09-19 | @ Missouri | +26.5 | 49.5 | 17-27 | Utah State | 09-19 | @ Utah | +26.5 | 55.5 | 0-33 |
| | 09-12 | Alabama St | -23.5 | 52.5 | 34-17 | | 09-12 | @ Washingto. | +28 | 55.5 | 14-16 |
| | 09-05 | Sam Houst. | -15.5 | 52.5 | 24-21 | | 09-05 | Idaho Sta. | -15.5 | 58.5 | 17-29 |
| Troy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Sam Houston St | -15.5 | L | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama St | -23.5 | L | 34-17 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri | 26.5 | W | 17-27 | UN | 49.5 | 7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 15 | W | 17-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-06-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-3 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Idaho State | -15.5 | L | 17-29 | UN | 58.5 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | L | 10-16 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Washington U | 28 | W | 14-16 | UN | 55.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 17 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Utah | 26.5 | L | 0-33 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-16 | OV | 13.5 | 15.5 | L | 0-26 | UN | 30 |
| 09-26-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona U | 31 | -11 | 17.5 | -15.5 | 18 | 49 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +26.5 / -11 | -34 / +6.5 |
| Washington State | 10 | 47 | 35(2) | | 35 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | +41 / -20.5 | -38.5 / +21 |
After doing essentially nothing with the ball in the Apple Cup vs. Washington and a subsequent trip to Kansas State, Washington State finally found a foe it could handle when Duquesne sent its basketball team to face the Cougs on the gridiron last week. It’s now back to the real world for Wazzu and recalling old Pac-12 memories vs. Arizona - which we’re not sure they want to re-live in Pullman. In their last trip to the Palouse before moving to the Big XII the following season, the ‘Cats would lay a 44-6 beating on the Cougars in 2023. Still around from that Aarizon demolition job three years ago is QB Noah Fifita, who passed Washington State silly with 342 yards through the air the last time he stepped into Martin Stadium, and is off maybe his best-ever effort in a long career at Tucson when nearly pitching a perfect game last Saturday vs. Northern Illinois. Fifita completed 31-of-34 passes for 325 yards and four TDs as the Cats had an easy time of it vs. the Huskies. Out-scoring Wzzu might not be a problem, either, as Kirby Moore’s first Cougar edition ranks dead last nationally in total offense at 204 yards per game (that’s not counting the win vs. the FCS Iron Dukes), as Big Sky transfer QB Caden Pinnick rarely had time to do anything other than dink and dunk in the first two games vs. quality FBS foes, without time to look downfield when passing for barely 200 yards across the U-Dub and K-State losses. Pinnick scrambling out of trouble was the Cougs’ most (and only) somewhat-effective running play, too, until RB Kirby Voorhes, who gained only a combined 62 rushing yards vs. the Huskies and Wildcats, found more room to run last week vs. the lower-grade FCS visitors from Pittsburgh and broke off a couple of TD runs, including a 58-yarder that has been one of the few big plays the Moore offense has recorded in the first three weeks. Meanwhile, the easy win for the ‘Cats last Saturday suggested Brent Brennan’s troops have put the previous week’s bitter loss at BYU, complete with questionable calls from the refs, behind them, as Big XII sources indicate the Wildcats still think they can make plenty of noise in the conference race and perhaps get another shot at the Provo bunch in the loop title game at Arlington. The league race is perhaps opening up after defending champ Texas Tech hasn't looked anything like the wrecking machine it was last season.
Play Arizona
| Arizona U | 31.3 / 17.3 | +14 | 18 | 39 | -20.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Washington State | 21.7 / 21.7 | 0 | 34 | 29 | +1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Arizona U | 09-19 | No Illino. | -34.5 | 50 | 42-17 | Washington State | 09-19 | Duquesne | -38.5 | 52 | 48-7 |
| | 09-12 | @ BYU | +6.5 | 48.5 | 17-28 | | 09-12 | @ Kansas St. | +17.5 | 48.5 | 7-34 |
| | 09-05 | Northern . | -33.5 | 59.5 | 35-7 | | 09-06 | @ Washingto. | +24 | 51.5 | 10-24 |
| Arizona U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northern Arizona | -33.5 | L | 35-7 | UN | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ BYU | 6.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 48.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | No Illinois | -34.5 | L | 42-17 | OV | 50 | -7.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Washington State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-0-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Washington U | 24 | W | 10-24 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 14 | W | 0-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kansas State | 17.5 | L | 7-34 | UN | 48.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10 | 10 | PK | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Duquesne | -38.5 | W | 48-7 | OV | 52 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oregon State | 40 | -11 | 31.5 | -13.5 | 33 | 55 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | +12 / -13 | +4.5 / +21 |
| UTEP | 23 | 56 | 47(2) | | 47 | 12 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +41 / -43 | -26.5 / +38 |
Before skipping along to Oz along the Yellow Brick Road last week, UTEP awakened from its dream of actually leading Michigan at Ann Arbor deep into the second quarter (wait, you mean that was real?) before the Wolverines stirred from their own slumber and scored 45 points in the last 31 minutes at the Big House. Still, we’re inclined to cut the Miners some slack after being forced on the road at Oklahoma and Michigan in two of their first three games in order to pick up nice paychecks in the process. The demanding early schedule might be preventing a fair assessment of Scotty Walden’s prize from the portal, QB EJ Colson Jr, like Cam Ward a few years ago transferring out of Incarnate Word to the FBS, though hard to tell if his four TD passes two weeks ago vs. outclassed Texas Southern is more an indication of things to come than the eventual mauling he got vs. the Wolverines, who tossed him for four sacks and -20 rush yards for the afternoon. While we and regional insiders still search for some answers on which level the Miners actually fit in their Mountain West debut campaign, we have a pretty good idea that the visiting Beavers are very much on the ascent for fiery new head coach JaMarcus Shephard, off of Kalen DeBoer’s Alabama staff and looking like he might soon get on the short list for some Power 4 openings after getting his first Oregon State edition to put a scare into Big XII powers Houston and Texas Tech in a couple of easy spread-covering efforts, plus a romp past FCS contender Montana. Fearless Mercer transfer QB Braden Atkinson has already rewarded Shephard’s rather surprising call to demote holdover Maalik Murphy before the opener, as all Atkinson has done is pass for 1,122 yards and eight TDs in three games, with five of those scores last week vs. the competent Grizzlies. Offensive coordinator Mitch Dahlen’s Air Raid-style attack aims to put maximum pressure on opposing secondaries in a full-out aerial assault. Dhalen's offense also features freshman wideout Jesse Legree, creating quite a buzz in the region and looking at a nice payday in an upcoming portal period if he continues as the sort of home run threat he has been thus far, gaining a whopping 28 yards per catch on his 17 receptions with TD catches in each of the first three games. If Oregon State is the go-with proposition it seems, we need more evidence than UTEP can offer that we should consider jumping off of the Beaver bandwagon this week.
Play Oregon State
| Oregon State | 32 / 28.3 | +3.7 | 35 | 27 | +10 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| UTEP | 22.7 / 37.7 | -15 | 47 | 25 | +16.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Oregon State | 09-19 | Montana | -17.5 | 56.5 | 52-17 | UTEP | 09-19 | @ Michigan | +34.5 | 48.5 | 17-52 |
| | 09-12 | Texas Tech | +26 | 52.5 | 24-35 | | 09-12 | Texas Sou. | -26.5 | 53 | 51-10 |
| | 09-05 | @ Houston U | +21 | 50.5 | 20-33 | | 09-04 | @ Oklahoma | +41 | 51.5 | 0-51 |
| Oregon State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Houston U | 21 | W | 20-33 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-9 | OV | 10.5 | 12.5 | W | 7-19 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Texas Tech | 26 | W | 24-35 | OV | 52.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 14.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Montana | -17.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UTEP |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Oklahoma | 41 | L | 0-51 | UN | 51.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | OV | 12.5 | 24 | L | 0-27 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | Texas Southern | -26.5 | W | 51-10 | OV | 53 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Michigan | 34.5 | L | 17-52 | OV | 48.5 | 7.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 20 | W | 14-17 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rice | 16 | 43 | 45 | | 44 | 35 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +10.5 / -52 | -7.5 / +44.5 |
| Fresno State | 24 | -12 | 28.5(2) | -18.5 | 29 | 43 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | +46 / -11.5 | -17.5 / +9.5 |
In retrospect, perhaps Fresno throwing green QB Jayden Mandal to the wolves in his first career start at USC in the opener a few weeks ago was simply asking too much, too soon. Against lesser opposition in two games since, Mandal has at least looked serviceable, though Matt Entz is still keeping the Bulldog offense in a safe-first mode. We suppose Rice could say something of the same after being outclassed at Notre Dame two weeks ago, but the Owls have looked much more competent at their own level, including a spread-covering effort vs. defending MAC champ and Michigan near-conqueror Western Michigan last week. Scott Abell’s unique “Gun-Option” Owls offense might be able to keep Fresno similarly off-balance, with dual-threat UCF transfer Jacurri Brown looking a good fit for this unique Abel scheme whose run-pass ratio is nearly 4-to-1. Abell’s platoon of slashing mini-backs has also been able to withstand the recent absence of last year’s leading rusher Quinton Jackson, who has been out since the opening win over Houston Christian with a knee injury. This week, Rice’s ground-gobbling style creates a challenge for the capable Fresno defense that’s allowed only 13 points total in the two games since the USC loss, but has been facing pro-style attacks (like the Trojans) or weakened facsimiles of such (Sacramento State and San Jose State) that operate 180 degrees from the Owls infantry-based approach. Meanwhile, with QB Mandal still learning on the job, we’re just a bit reluctant to trust the Bulldogs extending a margin, as Fresno’s infantry was gaining barely three yards per carry last week at San Jose before a late long TD run in the last two minutes by RB Bryson Donelson created a bit of breathing room vs. the scrappy Spartans, and PK Manaki Watanabe (six FGs the past two weeks) has been the most reliable weapon for Entz. Without being able to count upon proper balance, do we want to trust Mandal to extend this margin beyond two TDs? The mystery will be uncovered for all to see from the Dog House Saturday night on the CW!
Play the Under
| Rice | 17.3 / 27.7 | -10.3 | 44 | 31 | +10 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Fresno State | 25 / 17.3 | +7.7 | 29 | 35 | +0.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Rice | 09-19 | Western M. | +7.5 | 43.5 | 21-28 | Fresno State | 09-19 | @ San Jose . | -4 | 47.5 | 26-10 |
| | 09-12 | @ Notre Dame | +44.5 | 54.5 | 0-52 | | 09-12 | Sacrament. | -17.5 | 43.5 | 49-3 |
| | 09-05 | Houston B. | -22.5 | 47.5 | 31-3 | | 09-04 | @ USC | +22.5 | 51.5 | 0-39 |
| Rice |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Houston Baptist | -22.5 | W | 31-3 | UN | 47.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Notre Dame | 44.5 | L | 0-52 | UN | 54.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14 | 26.5 | L | 0-42 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Western Michigan | 7.5 | W | 21-28 | OV | 43.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Fresno State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ USC | 22.5 | L | 0-39 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | PK | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-30 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Sacramento State | -17.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -10.5 | W | 32-0 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Jose State | -4 | W | 26-10 | UN | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | PK | 6-3 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia Tech | 31 | -3 | 26.5 | -3.5 | 23 | 55 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | +3.7 / - | -11 / - |
| Stanford | 22 | 48 | 31(1) | | 31 | 20 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | -14.5 / -28 | +10 / +10 |
Reality might be setting in with new Stanford head coach Tavita Pritchard, who could be excused if starting to wonder if he should have stayed in the NFL (with the Commanders...well, maybe not, but we digress) rather than return to the Farm with his alma mater, as recent heavy losses to Miami and Duke serve as a barometer of just how much more work is needed for the Cardinal rebuild job. While the recent pummeling in Palo Alto vs. the highly-ranked ‘Canes might have been understandable, getting trampled at Durham by the Blue Devils - who rolled up 470 yards of offense (268 of those on the ground–-154 by slashing Nate Sheppard) - serves as a more-sobering reminder to the wine-and-cheese crowd in the Silicon Valley that there is a wide gap these days between their team and even the mid-levels of the ACC. They’ve simply run out of big-play threats on the Farm, with workhorse RB Micah Ford the only weapon who comes close (and it doesn’t look to be Michigan transfer QB Davis Warren, either). So unless something fundamentally changes in the portal approach, the Cardinal is unlikely to get much help from Ivy League transfers and other stray components as entrance requirements at Stanford rule out most of the players who are jumping around between the other Power 4 entries. Georgia Tech has some of those same built-in academic limitations, too, but has been able to work around those more effectively in recent years, and even as there looks to be a regression this year for the Jackets in the post-Haynes King era, Brent Key’s troops finally got a confidence boost last week vs. SoCon rep Mercer as new QB Alberto Mendoza (Fernando’s brother) pitched a much-needed three TD passes. Meanwhile, Michigan transfer RB Justice Haynes finally looks like he is feeling comfy in his new surroundings following an encouraging 81 rushing yards vs. Tennessee with 141 more yards last week vs. the Bears. In other words, ACC sources are reporting some progress with Tech since the ugly Colorado opener, especially noting improved offense the past two weeks. Consensus among the same insiders is that Stanford might be regressing instead. Unless the late-night kickoff in the Bay Area for an Eastern Time Zone team proves too much of a bother (and we doubt it, because no one in Atlanta goes to sleep at 9pm every night), this looks like a very manageable spread to handle for the Ramblin’ Wreck.
Play Georgia Tech
| Georgia Tech | 27 / 23.3 | +3.7 | 21 | 31 | -11 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Stanford | 16.7 / 35.7 | -19 | 30 | 19 | +10 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Georgia Tech | 09-19 | Mercer | -38.5 | 57.5 | 44-11 | Stanford | 09-19 | @ Duke | +10 | 51.5 | 7-35 |
| | 09-12 | Tennessee. | +12.5 | 55.5 | 24-45 | | 09-04 | Miami Flo. | +24.5 | 46.5 | 6-45 |
| | 09-03 | Colorado | -6.5 | 53 | 13-14 | | 08-29 | Hawaii | -4.5 | 48.5 | 37-27 |
| Georgia Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Colorado | -6.5 | L | 13-14 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Tennessee U | 12.5 | L | 24-45 | OV | 55.5 | 3.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 13 | 6.5 | L | 10-24 | OV | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Mercer | -38.5 | L | 44-11 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 24-3 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Stanford |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Hawaii | -4.5 | W | 37-27 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10 | -3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24 |
| 09-04-26 | Miami Florida | 24.5 | L | 6-45 | OV | 46.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | 14 | L | 6-28 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Duke | 10 | L | 7-35 | UN | 51.5 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Elon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| KEY |
| Score | The predicted score for an event |
| PR | The team's Power Rating |
| GS Line | The GoldSheet line, calculated using each team's Power Rating. |
| Avg. PR | The average Power Rating of a team over the course of the season. |
| Avg. OPR | The average of a team's opponent Power Rating on the day that they played. |
| SUR (H/A) | The team's straight-up-record, both at home and on the road. |
| ATS (H/A) | The team's record against-the-spread. |
| O/U (H/A) | The team's over-under record. |
| Pts. Diff. (H/A) | The team's +/- point differential. |
| Avg. Ln. (H/A) | The average line the team has had over the course of the season. |
| PF/PA | The average points a team has scored and allowed. |
| FD | The total number of first downs. |
| RA/RY | The number of rushing attempts and yards. |
| PC/PA/I/PY | The number of passing completions, attempts, interceptions and yards. |
| RA/RY | The number of fumbles and fumbles lost. |
COPYRIGHT 2026 © THE GOLD SHEET
ALL RIGHT RESERVED.