October 6th
| So Mississippi | 16 | 51.5 | 48 | | 48 | 33 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 0-2 | +9 / -19 | -8 / +25 |
| Troy | 31 | -9.5 | 38(1) | -11 | 38 | 40 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 0-2 | +10 / -10.5 | -19.5 / +15 |
Troy has won-and-covered each of the last five meetings, including a 28-18 upset win at Southern Miss last season as a 6.5-point road 'dog. The Trojans out-gained the Eagles by 124 yards in that contest as it became clear at that point of the season that former Southern Miss head coach Charles Huff (now at Memphis) had one foot out the door in Hattiesburg. Both teams are playing with equal rest. Southern Miss is still searching for its first win over an FBS-level opponent after dropping games to Auburn, UConn and Tulane. All four of Troy's games have stayed under the total this season, which is part of a 10-game "under" streak that extends back to Halloween of last year. We don't LOVE the idea of backing Troy to win by double-digits as a low-scoring, defensive-minded team, but we can only look in the Trojans' direction. That three-point win over Sam Houston in Week 1 looked a little shaky at the time, but the Bearkats are 4-0 against the spread this season (maybe 3-1 if you caught a low number against Texas Tech two weeks ago). Troy's 27-17 loss to Missouri also looks a little better at the moment considering what the Tigers did to Florida last week. On the flip side, Southern Miss' profile isn't holding up very well. The Eagles allowed 43 points against an Auburn team that failed to crack the 17-point mark against Baylor, Tennessee and Vanderbilt. A 28-point home loss to UConn certainly isn't holding up very well. QB Landry Lyddy was sacked four times in the Eagles' recent loss to Tulane. Southern Miss' best chance for success is to keep the clock running with successful plays on the ground, but that unit was only able to average 3.85 yards per carry against the Green Wave and the Eagles went 3-of-14 on third down. As long as Trojans' QB Goose Crowder takes care of the football, Troy should cruise to a double-digit win.
Play Troy
| So Mississippi | 16.3 / 38.3 | -22 | 48 | 30 | +18 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Troy | 20.3 / 21.7 | -1.3 | 39 | 36 | +2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| So Mississippi | 09-26 | @ Tulane | +18 | 52.5 | 21-24 | Troy | 09-26 | @ Utah State | +3 | 48 | 10-21 |
| | 09-19 | Connectic. | +3.5 | 54.5 | 20-48 | | 09-19 | @ Missouri | +26.5 | 49.5 | 17-27 |
| | 09-12 | @ Auburn | +32 | 56.5 | 8-43 | | 09-12 | Alabama St | -23.5 | 52.5 | 34-17 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Troy | 28 | 50.5 | 22 | 37/134 | 25/35/1/296 | 0/0 |
| So Mississippi | 18 | -6.5 | 20 | 30/97 | 20/35/1/209 | 1/0 |
| 11-30-24 | So Mississippi | 20 | 49 | 15 | 30/31 | 19/31/2/259 | 1/0 |
| Troy | 52 | -17.5 | 24 | 42/272 | 14/27/0/187 | 3/1 |
| So Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Alcorn State | -19.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Auburn | 32 | L | 8-43 | UN | 56.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 8-27 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Connecticut | 3.5 | L | 20-48 | OV | 54.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 12.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-27 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tulane | 18 | W | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 10 | W | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-06-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Troy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Sam Houston St | -15.5 | L | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama St | -23.5 | L | 34-17 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri | 26.5 | W | 17-27 | UN | 49.5 | 7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 15 | W | 17-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Utah State | 3 | L | 10-21 | UN | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-06-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 7th
| Jacksonville St | 31 | -3 | 36.5 | -5.5 | 37 | 47 | 3-0 / 0-2 | 3-0 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 1-1 | +18.7 / -14 | -11 / +4 |
| Kennesaw State | 27 | 48.5 | 43(1) | | 42 | 39 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 2-0 | 0-2 / 0-2 | +16.5 / -18 | -14.5 / +21 |
These familiar foes met twice last season with Jacksonville State winning the regular season meeting at home, but Kennesaw got revenge in the Conference-USA Championship Game with a 19-15 victory to capture the league crown. After combining for 61 points and 1,030 yards in the first contest, both defenses made the necessary adjustments in the rematch as we saw 34 points and 624 total yards in the second game. Both teams are on equal rest. Jacksonville State hits the road after a pair of winning efforts against Georgia Southern and Middle Tennessee. Kennesaw is still searching for its first win over an FBS-level opponent after dropping games to Georgia State, Tennessee and Arkansas State. That Week 2 loss to Georgia State as a 7.5-point favorite didn't look good at the time, but the Panthers have become one of the best under-the-radar stories in college football thus far with a 4-1 mark straight-up, 5-0 against the spread. All four of Kennesaw's games have stayed under the total thus far, but in our opinion, that may be giving us some value on the over. Jacksonville State’s offense has produced some strong numbers this season, although the results haven't always shown up in the final score. Against a defensive-minded Middle Tennessee team, the Gamecocks produced 517 total yards and 25 first downs but settled for three field goals inside the Raiders' 15-yard-line. Against Georgia Southern, Jacksonville State scored all 31 of its points within a 30-minute span and the Gamecocks didn't score in the other half of the game. They experienced a very similar outcome against Ohio, scoring 24 points before the midway point of the third quarter with no more points scored over the final 23 minutes. If Jacksonville State can keep its foot on the gas for 60 minutes instead of 30-35, we're expecting to see some points in this one. Yes, the rosters have changed since last year, but we're looking at a total (50.5) that is 11 points lower than the closing total (61.5) of the game that was played ten months ago. That's a steep adjustment.
Play the Over
| Jacksonville St | 27 / 23 | +4 | 37 | 41 | -3 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Kennesaw State | 13.3 / 30 | -16.7 | 42 | 34 | +11.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Jacksonville St | 09-26 | Middle Te. | -7 | 50.5 | 23-13 | Kennesaw State | 09-26 | @ Arkansas . | +6.5 | 53 | 14-17 |
| | 09-19 | Georgia S. | -3.5 | 51.5 | 31-27 | | 09-19 | @ Tennessee. | +35 | 60 | 9-42 |
| | 09-12 | @ Ohio | +1.5 | 49 | 27-29 | | 09-12 | Georgia S. | -7.5 | 55.5 | 17-31 |
|
| 12-05-25 | Kennesaw State | 19 | -3 | 23 | 36/72 | 26/32/0/246 | 3/1 |
| Jacksonville St | 15 | 62 | 19 | 40/210 | 12/22/1/96 | 1/0 |
| 11-15-25 | Kennesaw State | 26 | -3.5 | 32 | 46/217 | 27/44/4/362 | 1/0 |
| Jacksonville St | 35 | 56 | 18 | 41/259 | 9/14/0/199 | 1/0 |
| Jacksonville St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ North Dakota State | 6.5 | L | 7-33 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 3.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Eastern Kentucky | -22.5 | W | 49-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Ohio | 1.5 | L | 27-29 | OV | 49 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10 | 0.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia Southern | -3.5 | W | 31-27 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Middle Tenn St | -7 | W | 23-13 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-07-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-13-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kennesaw State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-03-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -21.5 | W | 47-0 | UN | 50.5 | 0 | W | 19-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 40-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia State | -7.5 | L | 17-31 | UN | 55.5 | -2.5 | L | 3-6 | UN | 12.5 | -4.5 | L | 3-21 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Tennessee U | 35 | W | 9-42 | UN | 60 | 9.5 | L | 3-15 | OV | 14.5 | 21.5 | W | 3-21 | UN | 34 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Arkansas St | 6.5 | W | 14-17 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-07-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-14-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Mexico State | 16 | 47 | 45 | | 46 | 42 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 0-2 | +11.3 / -13.5 | -6.5 / +19.5 |
| Florida Intl | 27 | -7 | 41(2) | -6 | 42 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 0-2 | +15 / -8 | -23 / +10 |
The home team has protected its turf in each of the last two meetings, but the Aggies and Panthers did not meet in Conference-USA play last season. Florida International earned a three-touchdown win in their last meeting in October 2024, out-gaining New Mexico State by nearly 200 yards. Florida International had an extra week to prep for this one coming off the bye, and perhaps even longer considering the Panthers' last game was against FCS-level Long Island as a 37.5-point favorite. The under is 3-1 in FIU's games this season as the Panthers' defense has allowed an average of 14.5 points per game thus far. New Mexico State is working on a condensed week after beating Western Kentucky at home last Thursday. That 34-13 final score was probably a little flattering for NMSU considering the Hilltoppers out-gained the Aggies and had more first downs, but Western Kentucky went 0-for-3 on fourth down and New Mexico State returned a pick-six for a touchdown in the second quarter to kick off the scoring barrage. Florida International has attracted some early money, and we agree with it. The Panthers' defense is No. 5 in the country in yards per play allowed this season. We imagine that FIU head coach Willie Simmons enjoys living in Miami, but he may have some options at the end of this year. In 2018, Simmons took over a Florida A&M program that was on a seven-year losing streak. He snapped that in his first season then went 9-2 the following year. By 2023, the Rattlers were 12-1, won the SWAC and won the Celebration Bowl. In the 2.5 seasons since he's been gone, FAMU has gone 13-16. He knows how to recruit, too, as the Panthers attracted the No. 3 class of incoming talent in Conference USA entering this season, while New Mexico State had the lowest-rated class in the league. The Panthers have earned our trust in a spot like this.
Play Florida International
| New Mexico State | 23.7 / 28 | -4.3 | 45 | 35 | +5.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Florida Intl | 21 / 13 | +8 | 41 | 46 | -13.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| New Mexico State | 10-01 | Western K. | -2 | 56 | 34-13 | Florida Intl | 09-26 | Long Isla. | -37.5 | 54 | 20-3 |
| | 09-26 | New Mexico | +11.5 | 47.5 | 18-42 | | 09-19 | @ Florida A. | +5 | 62.5 | 10-16 |
| | 09-12 | @ Hawaii | +7.5 | 50.5 | 19-29 | | 09-12 | Buffalo U | -8 | 47.5 | 33-20 |
|
| 10-29-24 | New Mexico State | 13 | 43.5 | 15 | 43/216 | 7/19/2/30 | 0/0 |
| Florida Intl | 34 | -7 | 18 | 32/102 | 18/27/0/338 | 0/0 |
| New Mexico State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Florida State | 31 | W | 17-34 | UN | 53.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 18.5 | W | 7-17 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Mercyhurst | -29 | W | 51-14 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 13-7 | OV | | | W | 23-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Hawaii | 7.5 | L | 19-29 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-9 | UN | 10 | 4 | L | 13-19 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | New Mexico | 11.5 | L | 18-42 | OV | 47.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 3-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-01-26 | Western Kentucky | -2 | W | 34-13 | UN | 56 | -0.5 | W | 6-3 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-6 | UN | 28 |
| 10-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida Intl |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-0-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ South Florida | 14.5 | W | 9-19 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-6 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Buffalo U | -8 | W | 33-20 | OV | 47.5 | -3 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10 | -5.5 | W | 21-6 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | 5 | L | 10-16 | UN | 62.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | PK | 7-10 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Long Island University | -37.5 | L | 20-3 | UN | 54 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-3 | OV | |
| 10-07-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-13-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 8th
| Sam Houston St | 20 | 52.5 | 44 | | 47 | 10 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +26.5 / -19 | -4.5 / +25 |
| Liberty | 38 | -13.5 | 33(1) | -12 | 34 | 44 | 2-0 / 2-1 | 1-1 / 2-1 | 1-1 / 1-2 | +18.5 / +8.7 | -21.5 / -1 |
The Flames and Bearkats have been involved in some tight affairs since Sam Houston joined the FBS ranks in 2023. Liberty earned a 21-16 home win in October 2023, never coming close to covering the spread as a 21.5-point favorite in their debut meeting. Sam Houston earned a 20-18 upset win as a small home 'dog in November 2024. The Bearkats are coming off a well-timed bye week after a hard-fought loss at Texas Tech the week prior. That 49-14 final score is awfully flattering for the Red Raiders, considering that was a 21-14 game at halftime and Texas Tech scored two touchdowns off interceptions. QB Landyn Locke was probably a little too amp'd up against the Red Raiders, but he's still shown some notable improvement in his second stint leading the SHSU offense. Liberty has won four in a row, including a 30-14 road win at Delaware last Friday against a trio of Blue Hens' back-up quarterbacks. We've mentioned it a couple times already this season, but the sentiment continues to grow stronger as the season wears on: Liberty's 20-13 loss at James Madison in Week 1 now looks like a quality result considering the Dukes are 5-0 straight-up and against the spread. James Madison has covered the spread in each of its last four games by double digits, so Liberty out-gaining the Dukes and holding them to 291 total yards now looks like a really strong result with the benefit of some hindsight and context. We are encouraged by what we have seen from Locke and the Bearkats' offense thus far, and we are interested in the over. Liberty was able to take its foot off the gas last week once it became apparent that Delaware wasn't going to pose much of a threat with a back-up QB. That might not be the case in this one. Sam Houston can push the pace and find the scoreboard, but like we saw two weeks ago against Texas Tech, the Bearkats can also gift some free points to the opposition.
Play the Over
| Sam Houston St | 30 / 24 | +6 | 47 | 33 | +8.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Liberty | 38.3 / 15.3 | +23 | 35 | 45 | -8 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Sam Houston St | 09-26 | @ Texas Tech | +34.5 | 55.5 | 14-49 | Liberty | 10-02 | @ Delaware | -7 | 51.5 | 30-14 |
| | 09-19 | Nicholls . | -21 | 51 | 59-0 | | 09-24 | @ Coastal C. | -2.5 | 50 | 34-17 |
| | 09-12 | Tulsa | +12.5 | 51.5 | 17-23 | | 09-19 | Ball State | -14.5 | 49.5 | 51-15 |
|
| 11-29-24 | Liberty | 18 | -2.5 | 18 | 36/179 | 12/37/2/83 | 0/0 |
| Sam Houston St | 20 | 48 | 18 | 42/135 | 19/34/1/202 | 1/0 |
| Sam Houston St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Troy | 15.5 | W | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 9.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Tulsa | 12.5 | W | 17-23 | UN | 51.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | W | 14-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Nicholls State | -21 | W | 59-0 | OV | 51 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Texas Tech | 34.5 | L | 14-49 | OV | 55.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 14-21 | OV | 31 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-14-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-21-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Liberty |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ James Madison | 6 | L | 13-20 | UN | 51 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Gardner Webb | -28.5 | L | 24-23 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 14-6 | OV | | | L | 17-20 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Ball State | -14.5 | W | 51-15 | OV | 49.5 | -4.5 | W | 13-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 23-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-24-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | -2.5 | W | 34-17 | OV | 50 | -0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | L | 10-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-02-26 | @ Delaware | -7 | W | 30-14 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4 | W | 20-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-08-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Missouri State | 27 | -2 | 46 | | 47 | 15 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 0-2 | +14 / -30 | -6.5 / +34.5 |
| Western Kentucky | 24 | 56.5 | 44(1) | -3 | 41 | 46 | 1-0 / 0-4 | 1-0 / 1-3 | 1-0 / 2-2 | +45 / -36 | -40 / +22 |
Western Kentucky earned a 27-22 road win at Missouri State last season. That game featured nearly 900 total yards of offense, but stayed under the closing total by ten points as both teams combined for six field goal attempts after three drives stalled within the opposing five-yard-line. Missouri State is coming off a bye week. The Bears are still looking for their first win over an FBS-level opponent after dropping non-conference games against Texas A&M, Marshall and SMU. The same is true in Bowling Green where the Hilltoppers' season is on the brink of collapse. You can excuse blow-out losses at Georgia and Indiana, but losing by a combined score of 83-27 against Nevada and New Mexico State is inexcusable. With four of the first five games played on the road, this is Western Kentucky's first home game against an FBS-level opponent this season. This number has opened in line with our power ratings, but we simply have no interest in Western Kentucky at the moment. With road games at Nevada, Georgia, Indiana and New Mexico State to open the campaign, the Hilltoppers' season was essentially toast before it even began. The bumps and bruises that you acquire from playing in Athens and Bloomington add up in a hurry, and this Western Kentucky team simply is not responding. Playing a rested Bears team off a bye is certainly not going to help. Bears or pass, in our opinion.
| Missouri State | 32 / 26 | +6 | 47 | 36 | +6 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Western Kentucky | 21.7 / 26.3 | -4.7 | 42 | 35 | +2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Missouri State | 09-26 | @ SMU | +30.5 | 59.5 | 24-34 | Western Kentucky | 10-01 | @ New Mexic. | +2 | 56 | 13-34 |
| | 09-19 | Marshall | +4 | 52.5 | 24-30 | | 09-26 | Mercyhurst | -40 | 58.5 | 52-7 |
| | 09-12 | Lindenwood | -16.5 | 53.5 | 48-14 | | 09-19 | @ Indiana | +44.5 | 58 | 0-38 |
|
| 09-27-25 | Western Kentucky | 27 | -4 | 25 | 27/161 | 26/39/0/317 | 0/0 |
| Missouri State | 22 | 59.5 | 21 | 34/214 | 15/31/0/200 | 0/0 |
| Missouri State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Texas A&M | 38.5 | L | 0-50 | UN | 53.5 | 10.5 | W | 0-9 | UN | 14 | 24.5 | W | 0-19 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Lindenwood | -16.5 | W | 48-14 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Marshall | 4 | L | 24-30 | OV | 52.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ SMU | 30.5 | W | 24-34 | UN | 59.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 14.5 | 19.5 | W | 10-14 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-14-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Western Kentucky |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Nevada | 0 | L | 14-49 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 7-21 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Georgia | 40.5 | L | 20-70 | OV | 55.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14 | 24.5 | L | 6-49 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Indiana | 44.5 | W | 0-38 | UN | 58 | 13.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 14.5 | 26.5 | W | 0-14 | UN | 34.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Mercyhurst | -40 | W | 52-7 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 10-01-26 | @ New Mexico State | 2 | L | 13-34 | UN | 56 | 0.5 | L | 3-6 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | L | 6-20 | UN | 28 |
| 10-08-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-14-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Alabama | 24 | 60.5 | 41.5 | | 42 | 51 | 3-0 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 2-0 | +15.7 / -14 | -11 / +15.5 |
| Arkansas St | 28 | -3 | 38.5(1) | -4 | 39 | 36 | 2-0 / 0-3 | 1-1 / 1-2 | 1-1 / 1-2 | +24 / -15 | -19 / +11.5 |
Each of the last five meetings between the RedWolves and Jaguars have stayed under the total, as those five contests have seen an average of 35.2 points per game. Arkansas State has covered the spread as a 'dog in each of the last three meetings, including a 15-14 upset as an 8.5-point road 'dog at South Alabama last season. Both teams are on equal rest after playing last Saturday. The Jaguars got a strong effort from back-up QB Jared Hollins, who went 14-of-19 for 321 yards with three touchdowns and no interceptions in last week's win over UL-Monroe. That result was good enough to cement Hollins as the full-time starter moving forward. There were question marks surrounding incumbent starter Bishop Davenport, who hasn't been seen since Week 2. South Alabama has gone 2-1 without him, and the Jaguars' coaching staff feels good moving forward with Hollins at the helm. South Alabama's last four games have all gone over the total. Arkansas State is coming off a hard-fought loss at Louisiana last week. The RedWolves held a lead midway through the fourth quarter, but the Ragin' Cajuns kicked the winning field goal as time expired. We are interested in backing the RedWolves at home. The move from Davenport to Hollins caught a lot of folks (us included) by surprise. But now opposing coaches have more tape on Hollins, and that initial "new QB bump" that some teams experience is now beginning to wear off. Hollins was only able to complete 53.5-percent of his passes against Kentucky with two interceptions and three sacks. The RedWolves' defense is certainly a step down from the Wildcats of the SEC, but Arkansas State is still a tough place to make the second road start of your career.
Play Arkansas State
10/05 12:35 PM PDT — South Alabama has made the full-time QB switch from incumbent starter Bishop Davenport to back-up Jared Hollins. The Jaguars have gone 2-1 with Hollins at the helm, and this will be his job moving forward.
| South Alabama | 38 / 38.7 | -0.7 | 42 | 37 | 0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Arkansas St | 14.7 / 22.7 | -8 | 39 | 33 | +6 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| South Alabama | 10-03 | UL Monroe | -13 | 56.5 | 52-35 | Arkansas St | 10-03 | @ Louisiana | +5 | 49 | 20-23 |
| | 09-26 | @ Kentucky | +20.5 | 54.5 | 21-45 | | 09-26 | Kennesaw . | -6.5 | 53 | 17-14 |
| | 09-19 | Ohio | -7 | 49.5 | 41-36 | | 09-19 | @ TCU | +19 | 56.5 | 7-31 |
|
| 10-14-25 | Arkansas St | 15 | 57.5 | 21 | 32/158 | 29/45/1/209 | 0/0 |
| South Alabama | 14 | -9 | 15 | 36/175 | 18/23/0/118 | 1/0 |
| South Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-1-1 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:3-0-1 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Louisiana | -13.5 | W | 39-14 | UN | 54 | | W | 19-7 | OV | | | W | 22-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Tulane | 10 | W | 24-28 | OV | 48 | 3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | 6.5 | W | 10-14 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | Ohio | -7 | L | 41-36 | OV | 49.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kentucky | 20.5 | L | 21-45 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | UL Monroe | -13 | W | 52-35 | OV | 56.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | W | 31-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Memphis | 10.5 | L | 24-42 | OV | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-21 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -31.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 56.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ TCU | 19 | L | 7-31 | UN | 56.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 10.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Kennesaw State | -6.5 | L | 17-14 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana | 5 | W | 20-23 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 10-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-08-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Florida | 21 | 49.5 | 34 | | 31 | 36 | 2-1 / 2-0 | 1-2 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 1-1 | +16 / +6 | -19 / -7.5 |
| Tex San Antonio | 27 | -5.5 | 28(2) | -8 | 28 | 45 | 2-0 / 2-1 | 1-0-1 / 2-1 | 2-0 / 0-3 | +21.5 / -5.7 | -21 / +6.5 |
The Bulls earned a 55-23 home win over the RoadRunners last season as a two-touchdown favorite. South Florida and UTSA have only met twice since becoming league mates in The American Conference, with those two games seeing an average of 74.0 points per game. USF fans would love to see an offensive outburst like that because the Bulls have been stuck in neutral all season for first-time head coach Brian Hartline. The cupboard in Tampa was not very full when Hartline arrived, but it was fair to assume that Ohio State's former top assistant would be able to build a competitive offense in a short amount of time. Instead, the Bulls have failed to crack the 20-point mark against Florida International, Bowling Green and Temple. Dating back to the end of last season, the under has cashed in six of South Florida's last eight games. The Bulls' rushing attack was only able to produce 3.35 yards per carry last week against Temple. UTSA is 4-1 to kick off the 2026 campaign with the lone loss coming at top-ranked Texas. There's been some sharp early-week money on the under in this contest, and we agree with it. Bulls' QB Michael Van Buren Jr. only has three touchdown passes this season, and he's only contributing an average of 2.4 yards per carry on the ground. UTSA head coach Jeff Traylor is known for attracting top defensive linemen in the transfer portal, which usually translates to a strong rushing defense. The RoadRunners held Rice's run-heavy attack below 4.0 yards per play last week. They only allowed 4.7 yards per carry against the Longhorns and no Texas running back generated more than 54 yards on the ground. If the South Florida offense can't generate success through the air, then the Bulls are going to struggle against the RoadRunners' defense.
Play the Under
| South Florida | 28.7 / 13.3 | +15.3 | 31 | 46 | -20 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Tex San Antonio | 27 / 29.7 | -2.7 | 28 | 28 | +1.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| South Florida | 10-03 | Temple | -5 | 50.5 | 13-17 | Tex San Antonio | 10-03 | @ Rice | -11.5 | 56 | 16-14 |
| | 09-26 | @ Bowling G. | -17.5 | 49 | 14-6 | | 09-26 | Colorado . | -14 | 56.5 | 59-45 |
| | 09-19 | Delaware . | -37.5 | 60 | 59-17 | | 09-19 | @ Texas | +30 | 58.5 | 6-30 |
|
| 11-06-25 | Tex San Antonio | 23 | 66.5 | 25 | 38/72 | 29/44/1/309 | 1/1 |
| South Florida | 55 | -14 | 20 | 29/239 | 16/18/0/233 | 2/1 |
| South Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:0-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Florida Intl | -14.5 | L | 19-9 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 6-0 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Army | 3 | W | 28-24 | OV | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 23 |
| 09-19-26 | Delaware State | -37.5 | W | 59-17 | OV | 60 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 28-17 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Bowling Green | -17.5 | L | 14-6 | UN | 49 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -9.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Temple | -5 | L | 13-17 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tex San Antonio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-1-1 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UT Rio Grande Valley | -28 | W | 45-16 | OV | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas State | 1.5 | W | 31-26 | UN | 65.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 14 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas | 30 | W | 6-30 | UN | 58.5 | 7.5 | W | 3-10 | UN | 13.5 | 18 | W | 3-20 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado State | -14 | PK | 59-45 | OV | 56.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | W | 35-21 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rice | -11.5 | L | 16-14 | UN | 56 | -3.5 | L | 6-7 | OV | 12.5 | -6.5 | W | 16-7 | UN | 28 |
| 10-08-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 9th
| Florida State | 27 | 61 | 18 | | 18 | 18 | 3-1 / 0-1 | 1-2-1 / 1-0 | 0-4 / 1-0 | +18 / -14 | -18.5 / +18 |
| Louisville | 34 | -4 | 17(2) | -3 | 15 | 23 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 1-0 | +17.7 / -3 | -17.5 / -5 |
Florida State has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings, but this will be the first time the Cards and Seminoles have met since the notorious 2023 ACC Championship Game. Florida State earned a 16-6 victory in that contest with back-up QB Brock Glenn throwing for 55 yards on 21 passing attempts. Since that win over the Cardinals, the Seminoles have gone 10-20 straight-up, 11-19 against the spread. Vibes are a little bit higher in Tallahassee, however, after last week's 38-7 victory over Virginia. Florida State attracted some sharp action in the betting market prior to that contest as word began to spread that Cavs' QB Beau Pribula was not 100-percent. That became pretty apparent early on as the Seminoles' defense held Pribula to 168 passing yards on 32 attempts and he was sacked ten times. Also, that Week 3 loss at Alabama looks A LITTLE bit better when you consider the juggernaut that the Crimson Tide have become in recent weeks. In fact, Florida State is the only team to cover the spread against Alabama this season. Louisville has dropped back-to-back games against Wake Forest and NC State. QB Lincoln Kienholz was facing some injury concerns last week, but the Cardinals' offense wasn't the problem against the Wolfpack. NC State's somewhat-limited offense was able to generate 26 first downs and 493 yards against Louisville's defense. Some early money has shown on Florida State, and while we can certainly understand the move, we have our hesitation. Let's not forget, the Seminoles struggled with FCS-level Central Arkansas the week before (first downs were 24-22 and the Seminoles' defense was on the field for nearly 40 minutes). Against Virginia, Florida State's first three possessions generated a total of 25 yards. The Seminoles' second touchdown drive started on the Virginia 33-yard-line. With an apparently-injured QB in Pribula, Virginia was doing everything to hand Florida State the game and it still took the Seminoles the whole first half to take it. Louisville has had issues this season, but the Cardinals are not going to gift this game to the 'Noles on a silver platter like Virginia did last week. Also, all five of Florida State's touchdowns were scored on runs by QB Ashton Daniels. Louisville's defense should know what to expect after watching that performance last week.
Play Louisville
| Florida State | 36 / 21.3 | +14.7 | 19 | 27 | -9 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Louisville | 32 / 30.7 | +1.3 | 15 | 20 | -6.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Florida State | 10-03 | Virginia | PK | 51.5 | 38-7 | Louisville | 10-03 | @ NC State | -5 | 56.5 | 28-31 |
| | 09-26 | Central A. | -45.5 | 63 | 34-7 | | 09-26 | Wake Fore. | -11 | 57.5 | 27-30 |
| | 09-19 | @ Alabama | +18 | 50.5 | 36-50 | | 09-19 | SMU | -3 | 57.5 | 41-31 |
| Florida State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2-1 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-2-1 |
| 08-29-26 | New Mexico State | -31 | L | 34-17 | UN | 53.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -18.5 | L | 17-7 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-07-26 | SMU | 3 | PK | 24-27 | UN | 52.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-17 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Alabama | 18 | W | 36-50 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 21-26 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Central Arkansas | -45.5 | L | 34-7 | UN | 63 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 24-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Virginia | 0 | W | 38-7 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 0 | W | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisville |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-3-1 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Mississippi | 6.5 | W | 38-41 | OV | 54.5 | 3 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | 4 | PK | 6-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Villanova | -39 | W | 59-13 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 17-3 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-10 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | SMU | -3 | W | 41-31 | OV | 57.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Wake Forest | -11 | L | 27-30 | UN | 57.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 21-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ NC State | -5 | L | 28-31 | OV | 56.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | L | 7-13 | UN | 28 |
| 10-09-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa | 21 | 41.5 | 17.5 | | 17 | 3 | 3-1 / 1-0 | 2-2 / 1-0 | 1-3 / 0-1 | +20.3 / +1 | -17 / +4.5 |
| Washington U | 16 | -3 | 18(3) | -2.5 | 16 | 14 | 3-1 / 0-1 | 0-4 / 1-0 | 2-2 / 0-1 | +11.3 / -4 | -26.5 / +7 |
There might not be much use for those purple lights on top of the Space Needle that used to illuminate whenever the Huskies win a game. Instead, they’re about to post an online poll in the Seattle Times to decide who among Mariners manager Dan Wilson (now dismissed) or Washington head coach Jedd Fisch is doing a worse job this season, as Fisch might be soon getting into Wilson territory. The Huskies have had to readjust their sights to the Guaranteed Rate Bowl in Phoenix after back-to-back losses in very winnable games vs. Minnesota and USC. What’s wrong? Regional insiders have noted a potential disconnect between QB Demond “Mr. NIL” Williams and his team since his publicized dalliance with LSU in the portal last winter, and Williams’ NFL stock now dropping like an out-of-favor dot-com while Fisch isn’t even trying to balance the offense with a ground game that ranks a sickly 126th nationally (one place behind winless Charlotte, for gosh sakes!). That unit badly misses the physical presence of the departed Jonah Coleman, now drawing paychecks from the NFL Broncos. Many Big Ten observers are also wondering if the Hawkeyes aren’t being a bit shortchanged by the oddsmakers here, even with the questionable status of QB Hank Brown, who left last week’s game vs. Ohio State with a shoulder injury. Backup Jeremy Hecklinski hardly looked a deer-in-the-headlights vs. the Buckeyes, getting the ball downfield and leading Iowa on a TD drive. Moreover, despite proving it was still mortal and unable to slow Ohio State WR Jeremiah Smith (who can?) last week, the Hawkeyes have another typically-robust Phil Parker defense that still ranks No. 8 nationally in points allowed (12.6 per game). Grudgingly conceding only 2.9 yards per carry, Parker’s platoon also looks a good bet to turn Fisch’s offense one-dimensional once again, and we’re simply not seeing enough from QB Williams as we did last fall to trust him overcoming those shortcomings. Note, too, that despite the loss to the Buckeyes, Iowa has still covered six of its last seven as a dog for Kirk Ferentz, and is a sparkling 13-4 vs. the line since last season. Meanwhile, the host Huskies have now failed to cover five-straight in Seattle.
Play Iowa
10/07 9:21 PM PDT — Iowa QB Hank Brown, forced out of last Saturday's game vs. Ohio State due to a sprained AC joint in his right (throwing) shoulder, will likely get nedical clearance for Friday's game at Seattle. As of midweek, however, HC Kirk Ferentz remained doubtful of Brown's participation vs. the Huskies. Backup Jeremy Hecklinski, who was engaged in a battle for the starting job with Brown throughout spring and into fall camp and took over in 4th Q after Brown was hurt vs. Ohio State last Saturday, has been taking starter's reps in practice this week, with soph Jimmy Sullivan in the backup role.
| Iowa | 29.7 / 16.7 | +13 | 17 | 24 | -6 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Washington U | 31 / 22.7 | +8.3 | 17 | 30 | -16 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Iowa | 10-03 | Ohio State | +14.5 | 46.5 | 14-31 | Washington U | 10-03 | @ USC | +7 | 57 | 21-25 |
| | 09-26 | @ Michigan | +4.5 | 40 | 20-19 | | 09-26 | Minnesota. | -12 | 45 | 24-27 |
| | 09-19 | Northern . | -37.5 | 48.5 | 55-0 | | 09-19 | Eastern W. | -42.5 | 59 | 48-16 |
|
| 10-12-24 | Washington U | 16 | 41.5 | 23 | 30/127 | 34/50/1/266 | 2/1 |
| Iowa | 40 | -2.5 | 20 | 37/220 | 8/14/0/108 | 1/0 |
| Iowa |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | No Illinois | -31 | W | 40-0 | UN | 44.5 | -7.5 | W | 20-0 | OV | 10 | -18.5 | W | 33-0 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Iowa State | -14 | L | 16-13 | UN | 42.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Northern Iowa | -37.5 | W | 55-0 | OV | 48.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Michigan | 4.5 | W | 20-19 | UN | 40 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 7.5 | 2 | L | 7-10 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio State | 14.5 | L | 14-31 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-10 | OV | 7.5 | 7.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Washington U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Washington State | -24 | L | 24-10 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -14 | L | 10-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Utah State | -28 | L | 16-14 | UN | 55.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -17 | L | 10-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Eastern Washington | -42.5 | L | 48-16 | OV | 59 | | W | 14-3 | OV | | | W | 31-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Minnesota U | -12 | L | 24-27 | OV | 45 | -2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 23 |
| 10-03-26 | @ USC | 7 | W | 21-25 | UN | 57 | 2.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | 4 | W | 14-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-09-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wyoming | 14 | 42.5 | 46 | | 42 | 27 | 2-0 / 0-3 | 1-1 / 0-3 | 0-2 / 1-2 | +12.5 / -21.3 | -11 / +6 |
| San Jose State | 26 | -4 | 42(1) | -5 | 44 | 39 | 1-1 / 2-1 | 0-2 / 3-0 | 0-2 / 1-2 | -3 / -2 | -9 / +13.5 |
Maybe that was just part of Pamela Ewing’s long-ago dream episode on Dallas when Wyoming actually scored 27 points and gained almost 400 yards of offense the week before in a thumping win over Hawaii. Yet at the Fargodome in the “Craig Bohl Bowl” last Saturday, it was back to reality as the Cowboys we have come to expect reappeared vs. North Dakota State and then promptly disappeared, with zero points and only 162 yards gained to show for a heavy 28-0 loss to the Bison. It’s apparent that with the nation’s 131st-ranked overall and 135th-ranked scoring offense, Jay Sawvel’s raid on William & Mary in the offseason for the Tribe’s OC (Christian Taylor) and QB (Tyler Hughes, with just 2 TD passes and six picks to date) isn’t working as planned. Meanwhile, at least Ken Niumatalolo has made some progress with his 3-2 San Jose State side that has favorable scheduling the next three weeks to get bowl-eligible (really!) before the slate begins to toughen up down the stretch. Remember, the Spartans have been good enough to go on the road for a couple of wins already (at Eastern Michigan and last week at Hawaii), and have found some balance on offense with senior RB Jabari Bates on course for a 1,000-yard season. Moreover, save for one bad effort vs. a rugged Fresno defense when tossing four picks, Rainbow Warrior transfer QB Luke Weaver has fired 11 TD passes and gives the Spartans the kind of aerial dimension that Wyoming has been only able to dream about with the struggling Hughes. Plus, with the easiest trip (relatively-speaking) back to the mainland from Honolulu, there should be no hangover from Saturday's rousing win over the Rainbow Warriors. Note, too, that the whispers around the Mountain West are now getting a bit more audible that Sawvel’s job could be on the line in Laramie if the Cowboys don’t start displaying some more consistent punch on offense...and soon.
Play San Jose State
| Wyoming | 12.3 / 20.7 | -8.3 | 43 | 36 | +6 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| San Jose State | 20 / 20.7 | -0.7 | 43 | 41 | -5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Wyoming | 10-03 | @ North Dak. | +17 | 44 | 0-28 | San Jose State | 10-03 | @ Hawaii | +2.5 | 51.5 | 20-16 |
| | 09-26 | Hawaii | +2 | 44 | 27-10 | | 09-19 | Fresno St. | +4 | 47.5 | 10-26 |
| | 09-19 | @ Central M. | -1.5 | 40 | 10-24 | | 09-12 | Cal Poly | -21.5 | 58.5 | 30-20 |
|
| 10-11-25 | San Jose State | 28 | -1.5 | 21 | 27/43 | 31/56/1/340 | 1/1 |
| Wyoming | 35 | 50 | 20 | 25/109 | 23/40/2/304 | 2/1 |
| 10-19-24 | Wyoming | 14 | 53.5 | 19 | 37/57 | 18/38/3/310 | 4/0 |
| San Jose State | 24 | -12.5 | 20 | 24/177 | 21/39/2/322 | 3/2 |
| Wyoming |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:0-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:0-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Colorado State | 2.5 | L | 13-35 | OV | 46 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9 | 0.5 | L | 6-14 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Northern Colorado | -23.5 | L | 21-13 | UN | 44.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 7-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Michigan | -1.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 40 | 0 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 19.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Hawaii | 2 | W | 27-10 | UN | 44 | 0.5 | W | 3-3 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-3 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Dakota State | 17 | L | 0-28 | UN | 44 | 4.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 10 | L | 0-17 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Jose State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-1-1 , O/U:0-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ USC | 37 | W | 26-42 | OV | 61 | 10 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14 | 23.5 | L | 0-28 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 1 | W | 27-21 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 0 | W | 10-7 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Cal Poly | -21.5 | L | 30-20 | UN | 58.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 13-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Fresno State | 4 | L | 10-26 | UN | 47.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | PK | 3-6 | UN | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Hawaii | 2.5 | W | 20-16 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | W | 14-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-09-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Washington State | 16 | 44 | 38 | | 36 | 29 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 0-2 | +3.7 / -20.5 | -10 / +21 |
| Utah State | 24 | -4 | 39.5(3) | -1.5 | 40 | 20 | 1-1 / 0-3 | 1-1 / 2-1 | 0-2 / 1-2 | -0.5 / -18 | -9.5 / +24.5 |
There’s word that the CW is getting inundated with ad requests from the makers of No-Doz whenever Washington State gets one of the evening slots on the new version of “Pac-12 After Dark.” So far, watching Kirby Moore’s first edition of the Cougs has been a fine alternative to counting sheep before going to sleep, as nothing is happening when Wazzu has the ball. The latest example produced just six points and 182 yards of offense in last Saturday's yawning loss to Fresno State. Perhaps the young (he’s only 36) Moore deserves a mulligan as this was a total rebuild in the Palouse after Jimmy Rogers kept the Cougs afloat a year ago following some deft work in the portal before taking many of them with him to Iowa State. In the meantime, Moore is saddled with an FCS-transfer (Caden Pinnick, via UC Davis, with just three TD passes and five interceptions to date) as his most-viable alternative at QB. Yet without receivers getting open downfield, Pinnick’s scrambles from the pocket have been among the most-effective plays for this attack that save for the 316 rush yards it piled up vs. FCS Duquesne (they still play football at Duquesne?) has rushed for only 81 yards per game, which would put it ahead of only lowly Northern Illinois and its interim coach in national rush stats. At least Bronco Mendenhall’s Aggies are showing a bit more life, squeezing inside of a spread at high-flying Boise last week in a third game against ranked foes the past month. Credit the Ags for trying to throw some leather vs. the big boys, as improving Virginia transfer QB Grady Brosterhous has tossed a pair of TD passes in two-straight games, while RB Javen Jacobs provided some needed spark to the infantry on the blue carpet when breaking off a couple of long gainers en route to 139 rushing yards vs. the Broncos. Though Mendenhall gave a brief look to early-season QB starter McCae Hillstead (BYU transfer; injured in Idaho State opener) last week, Brosterhous has the better handle on the offense and likely sees the majority of snaps and gives Utah State an edge here. Moreover, though many of the faces have changed on the Cougar side since last December, it’s a chance for the Aggies to avenge a 34-21 loss in the Famous Idaho Potato Bowl against a better (and more-potent) WSU side that piled up 628 yards worth of offense in Boise. We’re not expecting to see those fireworks on Friday night.
Play the Under
| Washington State | 26 / 22.3 | +3.7 | 35 | 34 | -10 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| Utah State | 13 / 26.7 | -13.7 | 40 | 24 | +14.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Washington State | 10-03 | Fresno St. | -2 | 45 | 6-26 | Utah State | 10-03 | @ Boise Sta. | +19.5 | 51 | 18-37 |
| | 09-26 | Arizona U | +11 | 47 | 24-34 | | 09-26 | Troy | -3 | 48 | 21-10 |
| | 09-19 | Duquesne | -38.5 | 52 | 48-7 | | 09-19 | @ Utah | +26.5 | 55.5 | 0-33 |
|
| 12-22-25 | Washington State | 34 | 50 | 30 | 41/255 | 28/47/3/373 | 0/0 |
| Utah State | 21 | -1 | 13 | 26/60 | 14/28/2/194 | 0/0 |
| 11-09-24 | Utah State | 28 | 68.5 | 21 | 27/187 | 28/45/1/208 | 1/1 |
| Washington State | 49 | -20 | 28 | 43/306 | 18/24/0/179 | 2/0 |
| Washington State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1-1 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Washington U | 24 | W | 10-24 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 14 | W | 0-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kansas State | 17.5 | L | 7-34 | UN | 48.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10 | 10 | PK | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Duquesne | -38.5 | W | 48-7 | OV | 52 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Arizona U | 11 | W | 24-34 | OV | 47 | 3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Fresno State | -2 | L | 6-26 | UN | 45 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-6 | UN | 22.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-5 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Idaho State | -15.5 | L | 17-29 | UN | 58.5 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | L | 10-16 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Washington U | 28 | W | 14-16 | UN | 55.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 17 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Utah | 26.5 | L | 0-33 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-16 | OV | 13.5 | 15.5 | L | 0-26 | UN | 30 |
| 09-26-26 | Troy | -3 | W | 21-10 | UN | 48 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Boise State | 19.5 | W | 18-37 | OV | 51 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 11 | L | 10-28 | OV | 27 |
| 10-09-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa State | 19 | 46.5 | 26 | | 27 | 27 | 3-1 / 0-1 | 1-2-1 / 1-0 | 3-1 / 0-1 | +16.3 / -3 | -12 / +14 |
| BYU | 24 | -11.5 | 15.5(3) | -13.5 | 14 | 21 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +33.5 / +12.5 | -28.5 / -11.5 |
After looking like they might have been better served to bring in devoted BYU fan Marie Osmond for a pre-game pep talk to get their attention last week, it is fair to wonder if Kalani Sitake’s Cougars might already be looking forward to the two games that will likely have the most-bearing on their playoff hopes, starting with next week’s visit of Notre Dame to Provo and a short ride up I-15 to Salt Lake City to face the hated Utes three weeks later. Drizzly conditions in Fort Worth and an aroused TCU defense might have had something to do with a lethargic showing last Saturday vs. the Horned Frogs, and the result (and narrow spread W) not salted away until recovering an onside kick in the last minute to preserve the grinding 17-10 win. Yet the mere 216 yards of offense at Amon Carter Stadium, and QB Bear Bachmeier unable to look downfield (we’ll say, just 62 passing yards on 24 attempts–just 2.6 yards per pass!) are issues that Sitake and OC Aaron Roderick are going to have to address ASAP. Moreover, top rusher LJ Martin (1,305 rushing yards in 2025, and on another 1,000-yard pace this season) went out early with an ankle injury in Fort Worth and is expected out at least a month, meaning he'll miss facing the Domers next week, too. Yet his absence potentially robs BYU of one of its most-dynamic elements who might be needed to extend the margin on a scrappy bunch of Cyclones who were within one score of Utah into the final minutes two weeks ago at Ames and are further battle-tested by a three-point loss at rugged Iowa and last week’s shootout win over an improved Rich Rodriguez West Virginia edition. New head coach Jimmy Rogers knows what it’s like to win (including an FCS title a few years ago at South Dakota State) and has crafted an incredibly-balanced attack at ISU that’s gained 971 yards through the air and 987 on the ground. All after Rogers found his serviceable QB in the portal when luring three-year starter Jaylen Raynor from Butch Jones’ Arkansas State, with dual-threat Raynor tossing a TD pass in all five games to date. Rogers also uncovered a big-play machine in holdover sophomore RB Aiden Flora, who ranks 7th nationally with 594 rushing yards and who destroyed the Mountaineers last week with 212 yards and three TDs, including 24 and 63-yard TD lightning bolts. In the end, BYU's brawling defense, allowing only 268 yards per game, likely proves the ultimate edge, but this would be a tough test for the Cougs regardless of the scheduling, with the potential look ahead to the Fighting Irish adding an extra degree of peril for the hosts.
Play Iowa State
10/07 9:34 PM PDT — BYU running back LJ Martin suffered an ankle injury last week at TCU and has been ruled out for the next 4-6 weeks, while linebacker Isaiah Glasker will also miss Friday night's game at Provo vs. Iowa State.
| Iowa State | 39 / 26.7 | +12.3 | 26 | 28 | -6 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-1-1 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 |
| BYU | 28.7 / 16.7 | +12 | 12 | 25 | -9.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Iowa State | 10-03 | West Virg. | -3 | 53 | 45-42 | BYU | 10-03 | @ TCU | -5 | 49 | 17-10 |
| | 09-26 | Utah | +7.5 | 46.5 | 17-31 | | 09-19 | @ Colorado . | -17.5 | 55 | 41-23 |
| | 09-19 | Bowling G. | -22.5 | 43.5 | 55-7 | | 09-12 | Arizona U | -6.5 | 48.5 | 28-17 |
|
| 10-25-25 | BYU | 41 | 49 | 17 | 28/103 | 22/36/0/307 | 1/0 |
| Iowa State | 27 | -2.5 | 24 | 34/184 | 24/36/3/311 | 1/1 |
| Iowa State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2-1 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Missouri St | -29.5 | L | 38-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Iowa | 14 | W | 13-16 | UN | 42.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Bowling Green | -22.5 | W | 55-7 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | W | 35-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Utah | 7.5 | L | 17-31 | OV | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 4.5 | L | 3-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | West Virginia | -3 | PK | 45-42 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| BYU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Dixie State | -50.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona U | -6.5 | W | 28-17 | UN | 48.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Colorado State | -17.5 | W | 41-23 | OV | 55 | -4.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 11.5 | -9.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ TCU | -5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 7-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-09-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 10th
| Indiana | 31 | -9 | 5.5 | -5.5 | 5 | 30 | 4-0 / 1-0 | 0-4 / 1-0 | 2-2 / 1-0 | +33.8 / +32 | -41 / -24.5 |
| Nebraska | 20 | 48.5 | 14(3) | | 15 | 26 | 4-0 / 1-0 | 3-1 / 1-0 | 3-1 / 0-1 | +32.3 / +18 | -24 / -5.5 |
Indiana earned a 56-7 home win over the Huskers in October 2024, which was one of the first stops on Curt Cignetti's tour de force through the Big Ten in his debut campaign. Things have turned around in Lincoln since then as the Huskers are 5-0 straight-up, 4-1 against the spread to open the 2026 campaign. After falling behind 16-7 in the first quarter against Maryland, Big Red responded by closing the game on a 41-7 run over the final three frames. Anthony Colandrea threw for three touchdowns and was the Huskers' leading rusher last week against the Terps. They still have a long way to go before they can be compared to Blackshirt defenses of the past, but this year's version has allowed an average of 14.2 points per game so far this season. Indiana picked up its first point spread cover of the year with a 32-point road win at Rutgers last week. The Hoosiers looked like the defending national champs once again as they out-gained the Knights 593-254 with a 26-9 advantage in first downs. Cignetti's brand of mistake-free football was on display as Indiana did not commit a turnover, did not commit a penalty and the Hoosiers' offensive line only allowed one sack. If we were writing a letter to Huskers' head coach Matt Rhule, it would start with "It's not you, it's us." Until proven otherwise, we simply can't trust Nebraska in this spot. Admittedly, this year's team does look improved and we wouldn't be shocked if Nebraska hung tough. But in terms of the trust factor, Cignetti has it and Rhule doesn't. Take a look back at all of Nebraska's big games last season. Neutral site against Cincinnati in Week 1? Didn't cover. Pick'em at home against Michigan? Lost by a field goal. Road favorite at Minnesota? Lost by 18. Short road 'dog at Penn State with an interim head coach and a third string QB? Lost by 27. Short home 'dog to Iowa in the regular season finale? Lost by 24. Bettors have seen this story play out in the past, and guys like Cignetti tend to be one step ahead of guys like Rhule.
Play Indiana
| Indiana | 38 / 12.7 | +25.3 | 5 | 31 | -30 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Nebraska | 37.7 / 14.3 | +23.3 | 16 | 34 | -16 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Indiana | 10-03 | @ Rutgers | -24.5 | 56 | 47-15 | Nebraska | 10-03 | Maryland | -14.5 | 52.5 | 48-23 |
| | 09-25 | Northwest. | -20.5 | 49.5 | 29-23 | | 09-26 | @ Michigan . | -5.5 | 49 | 31-13 |
| | 09-19 | Western K. | -44.5 | 58 | 38-0 | | 09-19 | North Dak. | -27.5 | 56.5 | 34-7 |
|
| 10-19-24 | Nebraska | 7 | 48 | 20 | 29/70 | 28/46/3/234 | 3/2 |
| Indiana | 56 | -6.5 | 24 | 30/224 | 24/30/1/280 | 0/0 |
| Indiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-0 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:0-3-1 | 1H SUR:5-0 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:0-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Texas | -40 | L | 52-16 | OV | 57.5 | -10.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -24 | L | 24-6 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Howard | -58.5 | L | 55-0 | UN | 68 | | W | 20-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Western Kentucky | -44.5 | L | 38-0 | UN | 58 | -13.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 14.5 | -26.5 | L | 14-0 | UN | 34.5 |
| 09-25-26 | Northwestern | -20.5 | L | 29-23 | OV | 49.5 | -6.5 | L | 2-0 | UN | 10.5 | -11.5 | W | 12-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rutgers | -24.5 | W | 47-15 | OV | 56 | -6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | W | 23-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nebraska |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-0 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1H SUR:5-0 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:4-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Ohio | -23.5 | W | 49-21 | OV | 47.5 | -7 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10 | -13.5 | L | 14-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Bowling Green | -31 | W | 56-7 | OV | 49 | -7 | W | 14-0 | OV | 11.5 | -17.5 | W | 35-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Dakota | -27.5 | L | 34-7 | UN | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 17-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Michigan State | -5.5 | W | 31-13 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | W | 24-10 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Maryland | -14.5 | W | 48-23 | OV | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-16 | OV | 12.5 | -8.5 | L | 28-23 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Carolina | 27 | 59.5 | 19.5 | | 17 | 19 | 2-2 / 0-1 | 1-3 / 0-1 | 3-1 / 1-0 | +21.3 / -31 | -21.5 / +11.5 |
| Florida | 38 | -10 | 10(3) | -12.5 | 11 | 17 | 3-0 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 2-0 | +39.3 / -11.5 | -27 / -4 |
Florida has won five of the last six meetings in this SEC matchup, with the last one being a 41-39 road win at South Carolina in October 2023. Gamecocks' head coach Shane Beamer can't afford another heart-breaker like that, and frankly, we're not sure how many more losses he can take under any circumstances if he wants to stay in Columbia. South Carolina is off to an 0-3 start (both straight-up and against the spread) in SEC play after last week's 35-34 loss to Kentucky. The Gamecocks jumped out to a 17-0 lead by the beginning of the second quarter, but the defense couldn't slow down Kentucky's offense after that. LaNorris Sellers ran for 147 yards in addition to his two touchdowns through the air. South Carolina's four games against FBS-level competition have all gone over the total. Florida is also licking its wounds after last week's 45-17 loss at Missouri. Just like the Gamecocks, all four of Florida's games against FBS-level competition have gone over the total. For the first time this season, the Gators' offense never got out of park. Jadan Baugh's Heisman campaign took a major hit after he was only able to generate 13 rushing yards on 12 attempts against the Tigers' defense. QB Aaron Philo failed to throw for 200 yards and he wasn't able to offer much on the ground, either. Even though Florida's offense struggled last week against Missouri, we see no reason to jump off the "over" train that each team is riding. The Gamecocks' defense was fired up and ready to go last week against Kentucky, forcing the Wildcats to punt on each of their first four possessions. As soon as Kentucky's offense started to make adjustments, South Carolina's defense had no answers. Big Blue scored on six of its last nine possessions. Beamer has floated the idea of benching Sellers, but after he produced 373 yards last week, the Gamecocks have bigger issues on the defensive side, not their veteran QB.
Play the Over
| South Carolina | 28.7 / 41.7 | -13 | 18 | 14 | +2 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Florida | 37.7 / 37.3 | +0.3 | 11 | 14 | -4 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| South Carolina | 10-03 | Kentucky | -2.5 | 53 | 34-35 | Florida | 10-03 | @ Missouri | -5.5 | 58 | 17-45 |
| | 09-26 | @ Alabama | +11.5 | 53 | 18-49 | | 09-26 | Mississip. | -4 | 59 | 52-28 |
| | 09-19 | Mississip. | -3.5 | 60 | 34-41 | | 09-19 | @ Auburn | -2.5 | 53.5 | 44-39 |
| South Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Kent State | -35.5 | W | 57-0 | OV | 53 | -9.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21 | W | 29-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Towson | -44.5 | L | 45-9 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Mississippi St | -3.5 | L | 34-41 | OV | 60 | -0.5 | W | 13-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 23-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Alabama | 11.5 | L | 18-49 | OV | 53 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | L | 10-35 | OV | 27 |
| 10-03-26 | Kentucky | -2.5 | L | 34-35 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Florida Atlantic | -25.5 | W | 66-21 | OV | 59.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Campbell | -51.5 | L | 52-3 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 45-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Auburn | -2.5 | W | 44-39 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Mississippi | -4 | W | 52-28 | OV | 59 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Missouri | -5.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 58 | -0.5 | L | 3-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | L | 10-20 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sacramento State | 17 | 43.5 | 55 | | 52 | 42 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 0-3 / 1-1 | +0.7 / -28.5 | -2.5 / +13 |
| Bowling Green | 28 | -9 | 45.5(1) | -10.5 | 46 | 36 | 0-2 / 1-2 | 1-1 / 1-2 | 0-2 / 3-0 | -7.5 / -31 | +8 / +21 |
Sacramento State is coming off a much-needed bye week after getting drilled over the last three weeks by Fresno State (49-3), North Dakota State (31-10) and UMass (35-6). This will be the Hornets' second road trip in MAC play after falling 28-17 at Eastern Michigan in Week 0. Four of Sacramento State's five games have stayed under the total. Bowling Green has quietly put together a pair of strong efforts in back-to-back weeks. After nearly upsetting South Florida as an 18-point 'dog the week before, the Falcons did upset Miami (Oh) as a 10.5-point 'dog in Oxford last week. Bowling Green out-gained the RedHawks and held a +0.9 yards per play advantage. QB Jay Kastantin played his best game of the season, going 25-of-37 for 305 yards with two touchdowns and no interceptions. The Falcons were clearly overmatched against Nebraska and Iowa State earlier this season, but in the grand scheme of things, Kastantin has provided a steady hand thus far. He's only thrown two interceptions and he's only been sacked a total of five times in five games. We probably won't be looking to lay points like this with the Falcons very often, but Eddie George has found something in the trenches with this group. If you didn't know which team was which in Bowling Green's game against South Florida, you never would have known that the Falcons were an 18-point underdog after watching them play on the offensive and defensive lines. Bowling Green generated six sacks against Miami (Oh) last week. The Falcons' offense is still limited on the playmaking side, but Coach George has found something in the trenches with this team. That’s going to be a big advantage against a Hornets team that should probably still be competing at the FCS level.
Play Bowling Green
| Sacramento State | 6.3 / 38.3 | -32 | 52 | 33 | +16 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Bowling Green | 12.3 / 29.7 | -17.3 | 47 | 31 | +16.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Sacramento State | 09-26 | Massachus. | +6 | 49 | 6-35 | Bowling Green | 10-03 | @ Miami Ohio | +10 | 41.5 | 24-20 |
| | 09-19 | North Dak. | +24.5 | 50.5 | 10-31 | | 09-26 | South Flo. | +17.5 | 49 | 6-14 |
| | 09-12 | @ Fresno St. | +17.5 | 43.5 | 3-49 | | 09-19 | @ Iowa State | +22.5 | 43.5 | 7-55 |
| Sacramento State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:4-0-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 8.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 53 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Miss Valley State | -38.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Fresno State | 17.5 | L | 3-49 | OV | 43.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-32 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Dakota State | 24.5 | W | 10-31 | UN | 50.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 10.5 | 14.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Massachusetts | 6 | L | 6-35 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 6-21 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bowling Green |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tarleton State | -1.5 | L | 13-20 | UN | 49.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | L | 7-17 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Nebraska | 31 | L | 7-56 | OV | 49 | 7 | L | 0-14 | OV | 11.5 | 17.5 | L | 0-35 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Iowa State | 22.5 | L | 7-55 | OV | 43.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | L | 7-35 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Florida | 17.5 | W | 6-14 | UN | 49 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 9.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Miami Ohio | 10 | W | 24-20 | OV | 41.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-6 | UN | 21 |
| 10-10-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/06 8:08 pm |
| Illinois | 27 | -2.5 | 19.5 | -4.5 | 18 | 27 | 2-2 / 0-1 | 1-3 / 1-0 | 3-1 / 1-0 | +11.5 / -23 | -19 / +26 |
| Michigan State | 20 | 48.5 | 26(2) | | 23 | 19 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 1-1-1 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 0-2 | +6.7 / -22.5 | -7.5 / +19 |
This will be Illinois' first trip to East Lansing since 2019. The Illini earned a 38-16 home win in their last clash with the Spartans in 2024. Bret Bielema's team is licking its wounds after back-to-back losses to Ohio State and Purdue. Illinois only found the scoreboard one time in the first 51 minutes against the Boilermakers last week before a couple of late scores to make the final score look a little more respectable. Illinois may be getting some good news on the injury front as senior receiver Jayshon Platt is hoping to make his season debut. Platt, a Florida Atlantic transfer who hasn't taken the field yet for the Illini, averaged 15.7 yards per reception with six touchdowns for the Owls last season. Vibes are low in Champaign right now, but injuries are becoming a problem in East Lansing. The team that Pat Fitzgerald was working with a month ago looks a lot different than the one he's got right now. Running back Cam Edwards is expected to miss the rest of the regular season and the Spartans were also missing top linebacker Jordan Hall and three cornerbacks - Tyran Chappell, NiJhay Burt and Keyshawn Williams - in last week's 31-3 loss at Wisconsin. Michigan State was only able to generate 235 total yards on 3.0 yards per play against the Badgers. Illinois has simply ended up in the "wrong place at the wrong time" discussion. Bielema's team was expected to take a small step back this season, but unfortunately for the Illini, that step back has coincided with other teams on the rise. Duke has turned out to be (much) better than originally projected, and the same appears to be true for Purdue. Games that looked favorable for Illinois at the beginning of the season, suddenly got a lot tougher and the Illini were not up for the challenge. This represents a spot where the Illini should be able to play with a little more freedom. Illinois also has a bye week after this game, and Bielema will certainly preach the importance of entering that bye on a high note. This is a good bounce-back spot against the banged-up Spartans.
Play Illinois
10/05 12:42 PM PDT — Senior receiver Jayshon Platt is hoping to make his season debut. Platt, a Florida Atlantic transfer who hasn't taken the field yet for the Illini, averaged 15.7 yards per reception with six touchdowns for the Owls last season.
10/05 12:43 PM PDT — Michigan State was missing top linebacker Jordan Hall and three cornerbacks - Tyran Chappell, NiJhay Burt and Keyshawn Williams - in last week's 31-3 loss at Wisconsin.
| Illinois | 28 / 25.3 | +2.7 | 18 | 29 | -6 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Michigan State | 8.7 / 29.7 | -21 | 22 | 13 | +14.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Illinois | 10-03 | Purdue | -9 | 62 | 17-24 | Michigan State | 10-03 | @ Wisconsin | +8.5 | 43.5 | 3-31 |
| | 09-26 | @ Ohio State | +26 | 53.5 | 19-42 | | 09-26 | Nebraska | +5.5 | 49 | 13-31 |
| | 09-19 | Southern . | -35 | 56.5 | 48-10 | | 09-19 | @ Notre Dame | +29 | 51.5 | 10-27 |
|
| 11-16-24 | Michigan State | 16 | 47.5 | 18 | 27/89 | 23/40/0/256 | 0/0 |
| Illinois | 38 | -2 | 18 | 30/139 | 19/32/0/231 | 1/0 |
| Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | UAB | -25.5 | L | 42-23 | OV | 54 | -7 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | L | 21-13 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Duke | -6 | L | 27-31 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Southern Illinois | -35 | W | 48-10 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Ohio State | 26 | W | 19-42 | OV | 53.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | L | 10-28 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Purdue | -9 | L | 17-24 | UN | 62 | -2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6 | L | 7-13 | UN | 31 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2-1 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-2-1 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Toledo | -10 | PK | 30-20 | OV | 48.5 | -3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -6.5 | W | 19-7 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Eastern Michigan | -17.5 | W | 35-7 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 26 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Notre Dame | 29 | W | 10-27 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 17.5 | W | 10-17 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Nebraska | 5.5 | L | 13-31 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3 | L | 10-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wisconsin | 8.5 | L | 3-31 | UN | 43.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 6 | L | 3-17 | UN | 22 |
| 10-10-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Buffalo U | 14 | 55 | 51 | | 47 | 35 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 2-0 | +1.3 / -27.5 | -11 / +24 |
| Toledo | 31 | -18.5 | 34.5(1) | -17.5 | 36 | 50 | 3-0 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 0-1-1 | 3-0 / 2-0 | +26.3 / +2.5 | -14.5 / -5.5 |
Buffalo is 4-1 straight-up and against the spread over the last five meetings in this MAC series, although the Bulls and Rockets did not play last season. After dropping the season opener against Michigan State, Toledo has won each of the last four games by an average of 31.0 points per game. Buffalo played arguably its best game of the season last week against Western Michigan, but it wasn't enough to get past the Broncos. The Bulls held a seven-point lead past the midway point of the fourth quarter, but WMU scored the game's last ten points to steal the victory. After rushing for 146 yards last week against FCS-level Robert Morris, running back Messiah Burch followed that up with a 106-yard day against the Broncos. All five of Toledo's games have gone over the total, but this looks like our stop to jump off that train. We simply don't trust the Bulls' offense to pull their share of the weight. QB Jason Wright was sacked five times in last week's loss to Western Michigan. Wright has completed 50.0-percent of his passes thus far against a schedule that includes Florida International, Robert Morris and Western Michigan. Buffalo's team total has opened at 16.5 points, and we're not sure the Bulls can eclipse that.
Play the Under
| Buffalo U | 20.3 / 34.3 | -14 | 49 | 34 | +8.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Toledo | 43 / 29.3 | +13.7 | 36 | 39 | -9 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Buffalo U | 10-03 | Western M. | +13 | 46 | 17-20 | Toledo | 10-03 | @ Ball State | -20.5 | 53 | 39-24 |
| | 09-26 | Robert Mo. | -28 | 46.5 | 31-28 | | 09-26 | San Diego. | -2.5 | 50.5 | 41-16 |
| | 09-19 | @ Penn State | +40 | 48.5 | 13-55 | | 09-19 | Temple | -4.5 | 48.5 | 49-48 |
|
| 10-12-24 | Toledo | 15 | -10.5 | 21 | 25/46 | 30/49/0/372 | 4/2 |
| Buffalo U | 30 | 44.5 | 19 | 52/230 | 11/20/0/127 | 1/0 |
| Buffalo U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:0-4 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:4-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Albany | -18.5 | L | 21-17 | UN | 47.5 | 0 | L | 0-7 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 14-10 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Florida Intl | 8 | L | 20-33 | OV | 47.5 | 3 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10 | 5.5 | L | 6-21 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Penn State | 40 | L | 13-55 | OV | 48.5 | 10.5 | L | 3-17 | OV | 13.5 | 24 | L | 6-34 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | Robert Morris | -28 | L | 31-28 | OV | 46.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | 14-14 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Western Michigan | 13 | W | 17-20 | UN | 46 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 7.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Toledo |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-2-1 , O/U:5-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-2-1 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Michigan State | 10 | PK | 20-30 | OV | 48.5 | 3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 6.5 | L | 7-19 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Central Conn. | -36.5 | W | 63-10 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 14-3 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Temple | -4.5 | L | 49-48 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | L | 14-24 | OV | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | San Diego State | -2.5 | W | 41-16 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Ball State | -20.5 | L | 39-24 | OV | 53 | -6.5 | L | 6-7 | UN | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 15-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tulane | 24 | 49 | 34.5 | | 33 | 49 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +3.5 / -12.5 | -14 / +15 |
| Army | 21 | -5.5 | 31(1) | -4.5 | 31 | 37 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 1-1 | +26 / +1 | -20 / -2 |
The Knights and Green Wave have traded home wins in recent years. Army captured The American Conference title with a 35-14 home win over Tulane in December 2024, and the Green Wave got a small dose of revenge with a 24-17 win in New Orleans last year. Tulane is coming off a bye, so the Green Wave had some extra time to prep for this one. You could probably make the argument that Tulane's prep started even earlier than that, because the Green Wave nearly lost to Southern Miss the week prior as a 17.5-point home favorite. Dating back to last season, the under is 7-2 in Tulane's last nine games. Army is looking to rebound from last week's 31-29 loss at Louisiana Tech. Samari Howard ran for 158 yards on just 12 carries, but the Knights' defense allowed La Tech to generate 8.8 yards per play. The Bulldogs did not turn the ball over and only had to punt twice. Our power ratings favor Army in this matchup, but Tulane's potential success against the option rushing attack is hard to ignore. Defensive coordinator Tayler Polk has been with the Green Wave since 2024, so he's seen both Army and Navy in American Conference play over the last few seasons. Tulane's defense held Army to 3.7 yards per carry in last year's meeting. Tulane's rushing defense has allowed 3.58 yards per carry thus far, which is top-30 in the country. With that bye week to prep, we're inclined to side with the Green Wave.
Play Tulane
| Tulane | 24 / 25.3 | -1.3 | 33 | 36 | -2.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Army | 24.7 / 25.3 | -0.7 | 31 | 34 | -2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Tulane | 09-26 | So Missis. | -18 | 52.5 | 24-21 | Army | 10-03 | @ Louisiana. | PK | 46.5 | 29-31 |
| | 09-19 | @ Kansas St. | +20.5 | 50 | 20-31 | | 09-25 | @ Temple | -3.5 | 48.5 | 21-17 |
| | 09-12 | South Ala. | -10 | 48 | 28-24 | | 09-12 | South Flo. | -3 | 45.5 | 24-28 |
|
| 10-18-25 | Army | 17 | 44 | 21 | 63/233 | 7/10/0/125 | 2/0 |
| Tulane | 24 | -10 | 23 | 29/141 | 22/29/1/261 | 0/0 |
| 12-06-24 | Tulane | 14 | -5 | 17 | 29/115 | 17/25/1/209 | 3/1 |
| Army | 35 | 46.5 | 20 | 57/335 | 2/2/0/17 | 0/0 |
| Tulane |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:0-3-1 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-1-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Duke | 9.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 51.5 | 3 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | South Alabama | -10 | L | 28-24 | OV | 48 | -3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | -6.5 | L | 14-10 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas State | 20.5 | W | 20-31 | OV | 50 | 5.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | So Mississippi | -18 | L | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -5.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -10 | L | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Army |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Bryant | -37 | W | 59-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 31-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | South Florida | -3 | L | 24-28 | OV | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 23 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Temple | -3.5 | W | 21-17 | UN | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | 0 | L | 29-31 | OV | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | L | 7-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Maryland | 17 | 56.5 | 27 | | 24 | 15 | 1-2 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 1-1 | 3-0 / 1-1 | +0.7 / -0.5 | -13.5 / +2 |
| Ohio State | 45 | -31 | 3(3) | -27 | 3 | 16 | 3-0 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 2-0 | 3-0 / 0-2 | +44 / +8 | -42.5 / -6.5 |
Ohio State has won all nine meetings since Maryland joined the Big Ten, but the Buckeyes and Terps have not met since October 2023. Maryland put a scare into Ohio State in 2018, forcing overtime as a 13.5-point home 'dog. Since then, the Buckeyes have won the last four meetings by an average of 35.3 points per game. Eight of the nine meetings have gone over the total, and that’s the only direction we can look in this one. Maryland's last three games have all gone over the total as the Terps have allowed an average of 45.7 points per game against Virginia Tech, UCLA and Nebraska. The Terps' only chance for success in this matchup is to turn it into a shootout, which actually has been somewhat successful in the past. As a 31.5-point 'dog in 2015, Maryland scored 28 points against Ohio State. As a 13.5-point 'dog in 2018, Maryland scored 51 points (45 in regulation then six in OT). As a 27.5-point 'dog in 2022, Maryland scored 30 points. It may come in garbage time with the game well in-hand, but we trust the Terps' offense to produce enough to get us over this number in the mid-50s.
Play the Over
| Maryland | 17.3 / 45.7 | -28.3 | 24 | 17 | +6.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Ohio State | 44 / 12 | +32 | 3 | 28 | -31 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Maryland | 10-03 | @ Nebraska | +14.5 | 52.5 | 23-48 | Ohio State | 10-03 | @ Iowa | -14.5 | 46.5 | 31-14 |
| | 09-26 | UCLA | +2.5 | 55.5 | 3-54 | | 09-26 | Illinois | -26 | 53.5 | 42-19 |
| | 09-19 | Virginia . | +2.5 | 53.5 | 26-35 | | 09-19 | Kent State | -52 | 58.5 | 59-3 |
| Maryland |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Hampton | -45.5 | W | 62-0 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 17-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Connecticut | -11 | W | 38-14 | UN | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -7 | W | 17-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Virginia Tech | 2.5 | L | 26-35 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 0.5 | L | 14-27 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | UCLA | 2.5 | L | 3-54 | OV | 55.5 | 0 | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Nebraska | 14.5 | L | 23-48 | OV | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 16-7 | OV | 12.5 | 8.5 | W | 23-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ohio State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:5-0 , PSR:5-0 , O/U:5-0-0 | 1H SUR:5-0 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:1-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Ball State | -50 | W | 56-3 | OV | 55.5 | -13.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -28.5 | L | 28-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas | 2 | W | 23-24 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kent State | -52 | W | 59-3 | OV | 58.5 | -13.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14.5 | -31.5 | W | 35-0 | UN | 35.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Illinois | -26 | L | 42-19 | OV | 53.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | W | 28-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa | -14.5 | W | 31-14 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-6 | OV | 7.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/06 8:08 pm |
| North Carolina | 24 | 47.5 | 23 | | 24 | 3 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +10.5 / -8 | -8 / +3 |
| Pittsburgh U | 20 | -3.5 | 22(2) | -3 | 19 | 17 | 4-0 / 1-0 | 3-1 / 1-0 | 1-3 / 1-0 | +30.8 / +2 | -22 / +1 |
It was good news, bad news for the Panthers last Friday night in Blacksburg. Pitt earned a gutsy 35-33 win at Virginia Tech, but likely lost starting QB Mason Heintschel in the process. Heintschel took a nasty hit to his knee, and early indications suggest he may miss the rest of the season. Holden Geriner went 8-for-12 with a touchdown pass in a strong relief effort off the bench. North Carolina put a scare into No. 3 Notre Dame before eventually falling 37-26 in monsoon conditions. That was a one-point game midway through the third quarter, but the Tar Heels were unable to overcome a -2 turnover differential. History can produce a LONG list of examples where Bill Belichick overwhelmed an inexperienced quarterback, and we're not stepping in front of that train. We like North Carolina quite a bit in this matchup. There are some back-up quarterbacks across the country that have played plenty of football and can fall back on game experience when thrust into action. Holden Geriner is not one of those players. After stops at Auburn and Texas State, Geriner arrived at Pitt with 21 career pass attempts and no meaningful game action. If he beats us, he beats us and we’ll tip our cap to Geriner and the Panthers’ staff for having him ready. But in a matchup of Belichick vs a QB with no in-game experience, we want Belichick.
Play North Carolina
10/05 12:15 PM PDT — Pitt QB Mason Heintschel is expected to miss the rest of the season after suffering a knee injury in last week's win over Virginia Tech.
| North Carolina | 27 / 22.7 | +4.3 | 23 | 26 | -4 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Pittsburgh U | 40.3 / 15.3 | +25 | 18 | 34 | -21.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| North Carolina | 10-03 | Notre Dame | +21 | 46.5 | 26-37 | Pittsburgh U | 10-02 | @ Virginia . | +1 | 53 | 35-33 |
| | 09-19 | @ Clemson | +3 | 44.5 | 20-28 | | 09-26 | Bucknell | -54.5 | 63.5 | 59-0 |
| | 09-12 | East Tenn. | -36.5 | 55 | 35-3 | | 09-17 | Syracuse | -10.5 | 51 | 27-13 |
| North Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ TCU | 7.5 | W | 15-10 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | W | 12-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | East Tennessee State | -36.5 | L | 35-3 | UN | 55 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Clemson | 3 | L | 20-28 | OV | 44.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 7.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-6 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Notre Dame | 21 | W | 26-37 | OV | 46.5 | 5.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 11 | W | 14-21 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Pittsburgh U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-0 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-1-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Miami Ohio | -16.5 | W | 59-14 | OV | 48 | -3.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 10 | -9.5 | W | 31-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Central Florida | -7 | L | 12-7 | UN | 55 | -3 | PK | 3-0 | UN | 13 | -4.5 | W | 12-0 | UN | 28 |
| 09-17-26 | Syracuse | -10.5 | W | 27-13 | UN | 51 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Bucknell | -54.5 | W | 59-0 | UN | 63.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 10-02-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 1 | W | 35-33 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 21-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/06 8:08 pm |
| USC | 23 | 0 | 13.5 | -1 | 11 | 18 | 4-1 / 1-0 | 1-4 / 0-1 | 3-2 / 1-0 | +12.8 / +7 | -18.5 / -21 |
| Penn State | 24 | 54.5 | 17.5(3) | | 14 | 20 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +27.7 / -1.5 | -24 / -13.5 |
Penn State won the lone regular season meeting since USC joined the Big Ten, winning in overtime in Los Angeles in October 2024. The Trojans found the win column last week against Washington, but failed to cover the spread as a 7.5-point home favorite. Since the start of Big Ten play last season, USC has gone 4-13 against the spread. Penn State's White Out is widely-regarded as a top-3 environment in college football, but the mood inside Beaver Stadium may turn sour if Matt Campbell can't turn things around. The Nittany Lions have suffered back-to-back losses, including a blow-out defeat at Northwestern last Friday. Rocco Becht looked uncomfortable once again as Penn State's passing game generated 5.9 yards per attempt with two interceptions. The Nittany Lions are only 13-9 straight-up in White Out games since its inception, losing in overtime to Oregon last year. We can only look toward the under in this one. USC has one of the best offenses in the country, but if anyone is equipped to slow the Trojans down, you'd think it would be D'Anton Lynn. Lynn served as the defensive coordinator at both USC and UCLA over the last three years before returning to his alma mater at Penn State, so he saw Lincoln Riley’s offense in practice every day over the last two seasons. And yes, there's no question that the Trojans' defense has issues, but the Nittany Lions don't look like the kind of team that can take advantage right now. As currently rostered, Penn State's offense probably compares pretty favorably to the Huskies team that USC just played last week: Mobile, experienced QB with limited playmakers and a solid offensive line. Well, USC held Washington to 21 points, 319 total yards, 15 first downs and 5.3 yards per play. If the Trojans can do that to Washington, they should be able to post comparable numbers in this matchup.
Play the Under
| USC | 31.3 / 32.3 | -1 | 12 | 18 | -8 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Penn State | 29.3 / 23.7 | +5.7 | 13 | 29 | -17.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-0 |
| USC | 10-03 | Washingto. | -7 | 57 | 25-21 | Penn State | 10-02 | @ Northwest. | -3 | 47 | 13-34 |
| | 09-26 | Oregon | +3.5 | 60.5 | 27-41 | | 09-26 | Wisconsin | -9.5 | 44 | 20-24 |
| | 09-19 | @ Rutgers | -21 | 58.5 | 42-35 | | 09-19 | Buffalo U | -40 | 48.5 | 55-13 |
|
| 10-12-24 | Penn State | 33 | -3.5 | 28 | 31/118 | 31/44/3/400 | 0/0 |
| USC | 30 | 52 | 16 | 24/189 | 20/34/1/220 | 0/0 |
| USC |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-1 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:0-5-1 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | San Jose State | -37 | L | 42-26 | OV | 61 | -10 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14 | -23.5 | W | 28-0 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | Fresno State | -22.5 | W | 39-0 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | PK | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 30-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Louisiana | -30.5 | L | 49-30 | OV | 59 | -7.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rutgers | -21 | L | 42-35 | OV | 58.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | L | 20-14 | OV | 31 |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon | 3.5 | L | 27-41 | OV | 60.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-13 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Washington U | -7 | L | 25-21 | UN | 57 | -2.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | -4 | L | 10-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Penn State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:1-2-2 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Marshall | -23 | W | 45-0 | UN | 53.5 | -7 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Temple | -24 | L | 27-9 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | L | 10-3 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | Buffalo U | -40 | W | 55-13 | OV | 48.5 | -10.5 | W | 17-3 | OV | 13.5 | -24 | W | 34-6 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | Wisconsin | -9.5 | L | 20-24 | P | 44 | -2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6 | W | 17-7 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-02-26 | @ Northwestern | -3 | L | 13-34 | P | 47 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 23 |
| 10-10-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Central Michigan | 24 | 46.5 | 45 | | 44 | 53 | 3-0 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 1-1 | +13.7 / -40 | -8 / +26 |
| Ohio | 20 | -2.5 | 40.5(1) | -5.5 | 40 | 48 | 2-0 / 1-2 | 1-1 / 1-2 | 1-1 / 2-1 | +15 / -10 | -17 / +9 |
Ohio has won each of the last two meetings, but the Bobcats and Chippewas did not play last season. Both teams are coming off MAC wins last week as Central Michigan took care of Akron, while the Bobcats beat Kent State. Ohio has been forced to use three quarterbacks this season, and the Bobcats' passing game simply is not clicking. Matt Vezza and Levi Davis combined to go 8-of-14 through the air for 72 yards last week against the Flashes. Things aren't looking much better in Mount Pleasant where Angel Flores went 7-of-14 for 78 passing yards against the Zips. Our power ratings favor Ohio in this matchup, but we certainly don't feel comfortable laying a field goal with the current state of the Bobcats' offense. Also, the fact that Ohio hasn't seen the Chippewas' run-heavy offense under second-year head coach Matt Drinkall is probably another small aid in Central Michigan's favor. While most other teams around the MAC have already seen the kinda-sorta triple-option that Central Michigan is running, this will be Ohio's first look. The Chipps can pull the mild upset in this one.
Play Central Michigan
| Central Michigan | 22.7 / 26.3 | -3.7 | 45 | 33 | +12 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Ohio | 28 / 19.3 | +8.7 | 41 | 48 | -9.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Central Michigan | 10-03 | Akron | -6.5 | 47.5 | 41-17 | Ohio | 10-03 | @ Kent State | -3.5 | 50.5 | 13-10 |
| | 09-26 | @ Miami Flo. | +41 | 52 | 3-52 | | 09-26 | Stonehill | -32 | 53.5 | 35-7 |
| | 09-19 | Wyoming | +1.5 | 40 | 24-10 | | 09-19 | @ South Ala. | +7 | 49.5 | 36-41 |
|
| 10-12-24 | Ohio | 27 | -3 | 18 | 35/283 | 13/22/0/147 | 2/2 |
| Central Michigan | 25 | 50.5 | 16 | 39/161 | 14/22/0/131 | 1/1 |
| Central Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ New Mexico | 11 | L | 7-38 | UN | 47.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Colgate | -18.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 49.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 0-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Wyoming | 1.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 40 | 0 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 19.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Florida | 41 | L | 3-52 | OV | 52 | 10.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 24 | L | 3-35 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Akron | -6.5 | W | 41-17 | OV | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ohio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Nebraska | 23.5 | L | 21-49 | OV | 47.5 | 7 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10 | 13.5 | W | 13-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Jacksonville St | -1.5 | W | 29-27 | OV | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10 | -0.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ South Alabama | 7 | W | 36-41 | OV | 49.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Stonehill | -32 | L | 35-7 | UN | 53.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Kent State | -3.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Coastal Carolina | 24 | 58 | 43 | | 44 | 40 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 1-1 | +4.7 / -7.5 | -10.5 / +13 |
| Marshall | 31 | -4.5 | 43(2) | -2 | 39 | 26 | 2-0 / 1-2 | 0-2 / 1-2 | 1-1 / 2-1 | +1.5 / -22.3 | -18.5 / +11 |
The home team has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings in this Sun Belt matchup. Marshall took care of business as a 7.5-point home favorite in 2024, and the Chants returned the favor with a 44-27 win as a home 'dog last year. Both teams are coming off league losses last week as Coastal fell at home to Georgia Southern, while Marshall was crushed at James Madison. Neither team has been kind to bettors as the Herd are 1-6 against the spread since the end of last season, while Coastal has dropped its last three at the betting window. Marshall was one of our favorite plays last week as a big 'dog at James Madison, and we're not ready to give up on the Herd just yet. Marshall clearly struggled in the trenches last week against the Dukes, giving up 310 rushing yards. JMU running back George Pettaway ran for 206 yards and two touchdowns on just 14 carries. How much of a concern is that going to be against a Coastal offense that is generating 3.88 yards per rush attempt this season? The Herd will need to strengthen the rushing defense in Sun Belt play, but Coastal doesn't look like the team that can take advantage. The Chants' longest run last week against Georgia Southern was 15 yards. Marshall probably doesn't have to worry about the explosive runs that they had to deal with last week.
Play Marshall
| Coastal Carolina | 18.3 / 29 | -10.7 | 43 | 38 | +3 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Marshall | 27.7 / 34.7 | -7 | 40 | 43 | -5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Coastal Carolina | 10-03 | Georgia S. | +2.5 | 53 | 24-31 | Marshall | 10-03 | @ James Mad. | +14.5 | 55.5 | 17-45 |
| | 09-24 | Liberty | +2.5 | 50 | 17-34 | | 09-26 | Gardner W. | -25 | 56 | 36-35 |
| | 09-19 | @ Delaware | +4.5 | 56.5 | 14-22 | | 09-19 | @ Missouri . | -4 | 52.5 | 30-24 |
|
| 10-30-25 | Marshall | 27 | -6.5 | 22 | 45/279 | 21/36/2/153 | 4/3 |
| Coastal Carolina | 44 | 55 | 16 | 44/215 | 8/21/1/196 | 3/1 |
| 11-16-24 | Coastal Carolina | 19 | 57 | 20 | 36/124 | 21/40/1/267 | 3/2 |
| Marshall | 31 | -7.5 | 17 | 32/35 | 20/31/0/219 | 1/0 |
| Coastal Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ West Virginia | 21 | W | 24-31 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Fordham | -36.5 | W | 45-7 | UN | 54 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Delaware | 4.5 | L | 14-22 | UN | 56.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | W | 14-15 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-24-26 | Liberty | 2.5 | L | 17-34 | OV | 50 | 0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | W | 17-10 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Georgia Southern | 2.5 | L | 24-31 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 1 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Marshall |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Penn State | 23 | L | 0-45 | UN | 53.5 | 7 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Middle Tenn St | -11.5 | L | 28-26 | UN | 56 | -5.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | L | 14-13 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri State | -4 | W | 30-24 | OV | 52.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Gardner Webb | -25 | L | 36-35 | OV | 56 | | L | 10-14 | OV | | | W | 27-21 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ James Madison | 14.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 55.5 | 5.5 | W | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | 9 | L | 14-38 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| LSU | 31 | -9 | 8.5 | -8 | 8 | 55 | 4-0 / 0-1 | 2-2 / 0-1 | 3-1 / 0-1 | +37.5 / -8 | -26.5 / -3 |
| Kentucky | 27 | 50.5 | 18.5(2) | | 20 | 20 | 2-1 / 2-0 | 2-1 / 2-0 | 2-1 / 2-0 | +9.3 / +5.5 | -11.5 / +10 |
LSU and Kentucky have been playing football in the SEC for decades, but the Wildcats and Tigers will have to reintroduce themselves in Lexington. These teams have only played one time in the last 11 seasons - A 42-21 Kentucky win in October 2021. Perhaps the SEC schedule makers forgot that they could put the 'Cats and Tigers together on the gridiron. LSU hits the road for its second road test of the season after previously falling at Ole Miss. The Tigers got a mid-season tune-up last week, beating FCS-level McNeese 63-14. Injury concerns continue to swirl around QB Sam Leavitt, who went 18-of-23 through the air against the Cowboys, but did not attempt a single rush. That's a good thing. You want to protect your QB when you're playing an FCS opponent. But considering Leavitt had 11 rushing attempts against inferior Louisiana Tech a couple weeks ago, it's fair to question why the change in philosophy and whether he’s covering up some injuries. Kentucky has won-and-covered each of its last three games, including outright upset wins at Texas A&M and South Carolina. The 'Cats probably should be 5-0 against the spread this season if it hadn't been for a fourth quarter collapse against Alabama in Week 2. Kentucky's last four games have all gone over the total (last week's overtime game against South Carolina cleared the closing total in regulation and didn't need the points in OT to cash). Similar to the way Alabama QB Keelon Russell had his coming-of-age moment against Kentucky earlier this season, Wildcats' QB Kenny Minchey may have had his "ah ha" moment last week against the Gamecocks. Minchey hadn't really been the focal point of Kentucky's offense through the first four weeks, but that changed last week in Columbia and you could see his confidence grow with every play. Minchey finished with 272 yards, three touchdowns and no interceptions. Let's not forget, Lane Kiffin's Ole Miss squad struggled last year against a worse version of Kentucky (30-23 Rebels win). With a new coach and a little more swagger in Lexington, we wouldn't be shocked if Big Blue kept this one close.
Play Kentucky
| LSU | 40.7 / 17.3 | +23.3 | 8 | 25 | -21.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Kentucky | 37 / 25.3 | +11.7 | 19 | 23 | -0.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| LSU | 10-03 | McNeese S. | -54 | 62.5 | 63-14 | Kentucky | 10-03 | @ South Car. | +2.5 | 53 | 35-34 |
| | 09-26 | Texas A&M | -8 | 52.5 | 35-6 | | 09-26 | South Ala. | -20.5 | 54.5 | 45-21 |
| | 09-19 | @ Mississip. | -3 | 59 | 24-32 | | 09-19 | @ Texas A&M | +17 | 48.5 | 31-21 |
| LSU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Clemson | -10 | W | 51-10 | OV | 49 | -3 | W | 17-3 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 31-3 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Louisiana Tech | -34.5 | L | 45-14 | OV | 55 | -9.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Mississippi | -3 | L | 24-32 | UN | 59 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Texas A&M | -8 | W | 35-6 | UN | 52.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | McNeese State | -54 | L | 63-14 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kentucky |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Youngstown St | -22.5 | W | 45-13 | UN | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama | 9 | L | 17-45 | OV | 47.5 | 3 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 5.5 | W | 17-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas A&M | 17 | W | 31-21 | OV | 48.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Alabama | -20.5 | W | 45-21 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Carolina | 2.5 | W | 35-34 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-20 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona U | 38 | -3.5 | 19 | -5.5 | 18 | 26 | 3-0 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 1-1 | +26.7 / -0.5 | -25 / -2.5 |
| West Virginia | 31 | 61.5 | 27.5(3) | | 27 | 26 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 0-0-1 | 3-0 / 1-0 | +11.7 / -3 | -21.5 / +3 |
West Virginia won the lone meeting with the Wildcats since they became Big XII foes, claiming a 31-26 road win in October 2024. The Mountaineers have their backs against the wall this week after dropping back-to-back games against Oklahoma State and Iowa State. WVU's defense allowed 41 points to the Cowboys followed by 45 points to the Cyclones last week. Iowa State generated 577 total yards, including 212 on the ground by running back Aiden Flora. The Wildcats have won each of their last three games, but Arizona's receiving corps had a disastrous outing last week against Cincinnati. Tre Spivey will miss the rest of the season with a broken foot. Chris Hunter was seen wearing a knee brace on the sideline after the game, while Gio Richardson suffered a hamstring injury. Can Arizona's rushing attack exploit the Mountaineers' defense the way that Iowa State did last week? Perhaps. Lead running back Kedrick Reescano was only able to produce 57 yards on 21 carries last week against Cincinnati, but the Wildcats were able to produce explosive runs with Antwan Roberts Jr. and Quincy Craig. We don't LOVE the idea of backing Arizona with cross-country travel and a banged-up receiving corps, but after watching what West Virginia's defense has done over the last two weeks, the Wildcats may find success in this matchup by simply running the ball up the middle.
Play the Over
10/05 12:48 PM PDT — Arizona's receiving corps had a disastrous outing last week against Cincinnati. Tre Spivey will miss the rest of the season with a broken foot. Chris Hunter was seen wearing a knee brace on the sideline after the game, while Gio Richardson suffered a hamstring injury.
| Arizona U | 36.7 / 16 | +20.7 | 18 | 37 | -17.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| West Virginia | 34.7 / 37.7 | -3 | 27 | 22 | +4 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Arizona U | 10-03 | Cincinnat. | -7 | 56.5 | 34-7 | West Virginia | 10-03 | @ Iowa State | +3 | 53 | 42-45 |
| | 09-26 | @ Washingto. | -11 | 47 | 34-24 | | 09-26 | Oklahoma . | -2 | 60.5 | 24-41 |
| | 09-19 | No Illino. | -34.5 | 50 | 42-17 | | 09-19 | @ Virginia | +10.5 | 51.5 | 38-27 |
|
| 10-26-24 | West Virginia | 31 | 51.5 | 16 | 40/203 | 18/22/0/198 | 1/0 |
| Arizona U | 26 | -5.5 | 18 | 25/78 | 22/34/0/308 | 2/1 |
| Arizona U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northern Arizona | -33.5 | L | 35-7 | UN | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ BYU | 6.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 48.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | No Illinois | -34.5 | L | 42-17 | OV | 50 | -7.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington State | -11 | L | 34-24 | OV | 47 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Cincinnati U | -7 | W | 34-7 | UN | 56.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| West Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2-1 , O/U:5-0-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Coastal Carolina | -21 | L | 31-24 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Tenn Martin | -41.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 57 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Virginia | 10.5 | W | 38-27 | OV | 51.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma State | -2 | L | 24-41 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13 | -0.5 | W | 14-13 | UN | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa State | 3 | PK | 42-45 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Eastern Michigan | 31 | -4.5 | 45 | -7.5 | 45 | 41 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 0-3 / 2-1 | +10.3 / -16 | -11 / +15.5 |
| Akron | 20 | 51.5 | 53.5(1) | | 52 | 45 | 1-1 / 0-3 | 1-1 / 1-2 | 1-1 / 2-1 | +3.5 / -26.7 | -7 / +19 |
Akron has covered the number in each of the last three meetings, but the Zips and Eagles did not play last year. Akron entered the season with some lofty hopes in the MAC, but injuries and NCAA eligibility issues have created some other plans. After showing plenty of fight for head coach Joe Moorhead last year when the Zips were not eligible to make a bowl, this was supposed to be a season where Akron could compete for a postseason berth. First, the NCAA ruled that transfer QB Reese Poffenbarger was not going to be eligible. Then, the injury train came rolling down the tracks. Akron has failed to cover the spread in its last three games by an average margin of -14.2 points per game. After taking a 7-0 lead against Central Michigan last week, the Zips trailed 28-7 a little over 17 minutes later. When you are short-handed and battling injuries in the MAC, Central Michigan is the last team you want to see on your schedule because of their physical rushing attack. The Chipps ran the ball 45 times for 332 yards last week. Typically you're not looking to lay points with Eastern Michigan because the Eagles have been much better as a 'dog in the betting market, but we haven't seen any signs of the Zips being able to pick themselves off the mat.
Play Eastern Michigan
| Eastern Michigan | 25.7 / 23.7 | +2 | 46 | 39 | +1.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Akron | 11.3 / 40 | -28.7 | 52 | 32 | +14 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Eastern Michigan | 10-03 | @ Massachus. | +5.5 | 48.5 | 38-14 | Akron | 10-03 | @ Central M. | +6.5 | 47.5 | 17-41 |
| | 09-26 | Lindenwood | -24 | 53 | 29-3 | | 09-26 | UNLV | +13 | 53 | 10-38 |
| | 09-19 | @ Wisconsin | +23.5 | 44 | 10-54 | | 09-19 | @ Minnesota. | +22.5 | 48.5 | 7-41 |
|
| 10-26-24 | Eastern Michigan | 21 | -2.5 | 22 | 32/114 | 28/47/0/346 | 1/1 |
| Akron | 25 | 50.5 | 20 | 31/220 | 14/26/1/158 | 0/0 |
| Eastern Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Sacramento State | -8.5 | W | 28-17 | UN | 53 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-04-26 | San Jose State | -1 | L | 21-27 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 0 | L | 7-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Michigan State | 17.5 | L | 7-35 | UN | 49.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 26 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Wisconsin | 23.5 | L | 10-54 | OV | 44 | 6.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Lindenwood | -24 | W | 29-3 | UN | 53 | | W | 13-0 | OV | | | W | 19-0 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Massachusetts | 5.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Akron |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | 28 | W | 16-38 | OV | 50.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Robert Morris | -26.5 | W | 45-10 | OV | 45.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Minnesota U | 22.5 | L | 7-41 | UN | 48.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | UNLV | 13 | L | 10-38 | UN | 53 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | W | 10-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Central Michigan | 6.5 | L | 17-41 | OV | 47.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wake Forest | 38 | -3.5 | 18.5 | -1 | 21 | 31 | 2-1 / 2-0 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 1-1 | +21 / +2.5 | -7.5 / +4.5 |
| NC State | 35 | 56 | 21.5(2) | | 21 | 16 | 3-0 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 3-0 / 1-1 | +28.7 / -15 | -14 / +3.5 |
The road team has won-and-covered each of the last three installments of this ACC series. Wake Forest earned a 34-30 road win in Raleigh in 2024, and the Wolfpack returned the favor with a 34-24 win in Winston Salem last year. The Demon Deacons continue to be one of the best stories in college football, and if this run continues, Jake Dickert is a name that you're going to hear a lot about over the next few months. Wake Forest has covered the spread over the last three games by 6.5, 14.5 and 39.5 points. It's likely going to stay under the national radar because most of us have forgotten what we did yesterday, let alone a month ago. But Dave Doeren and the Wolfpack deserve a ton of credit for bouncing back from that horrific loss to Vanderbilt three weeks ago. NC State easily could have packed up shop and thrown a pity party after that collapse against the Commodores, but the 'Pack handled business by double digits in a very tough spot against in-state foe App State, then beat Louisville last week as a 5.5-point home 'dog. CJ Bailey, who drew most of the criticism for that loss in Nashville, threw for 373 yards and two touchdowns last week against the Cardinals. NC State's last four games have all gone over the total as those contests have seen an average of 67.5 points per game. Dating back to the end of last season, Wake Forest has scored an average of 38.8 points per game over the last eight games, and that list of opponents includes six Power 4 conference teams and no FCS-level teams. First team to 40 points wins?
Play the Over
| Wake Forest | 35.7 / 21 | +14.7 | 22 | 17 | +5.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| NC State | 34.3 / 31.3 | +3 | 22 | 24 | -1.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Wake Forest | 10-03 | Stanford | -14.5 | 54 | 57-3 | NC State | 10-03 | Louisville | +5 | 56.5 | 31-28 |
| | 09-26 | @ Louisville | +11 | 57.5 | 30-27 | | 09-26 | Appalachi. | -13 | 56 | 41-31 |
| | 09-18 | Miami Flo. | +20 | 55.5 | 20-33 | | 09-19 | @ Vanderbilt | +3 | 50.5 | 31-35 |
|
| Wake Forest |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:5-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Akron | -28 | L | 38-16 | OV | 50.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -16.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | L | 38-36 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -1 | W | 17-10 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-18-26 | Miami Florida | 20 | W | 20-33 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 11 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Louisville | 11 | W | 30-27 | UN | 57.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 7 | W | 24-21 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Stanford | -14.5 | W | 57-3 | OV | 54 | -3.5 | W | 15-0 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 29-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Merrimack College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| NC State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:3-1-1 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Virginia | 4 | L | 8-34 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 2.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Richmond | -33.5 | W | 73-0 | OV | 50.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 49-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 3 | L | 31-35 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Appalachian St | -13 | L | 41-31 | OV | 56 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | W | 28-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Louisville | 5 | W | 31-28 | OV | 56.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | W | 13-7 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Syracuse | 27 | 49 | 30.5 | | 29 | 40 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +30 / -6.5 | -20 / +2 |
| Virginia | 31 | -14 | 20(2) | -12.5 | 18 | 19 | 3-0 / 0-1 | 3-0 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 0-1 | +40.3 / -31 | -23.5 / 0 |
The Orange and Cavs have only met one time in the last ten seasons: A 22-20 Syracuse home win in September 2022. Some late whispers entered the betting market last week that Virginia QB Beau Pribula was not 100-percent heading into the Cavs' game against Florida State. That became pretty apparent early on as the Seminoles' defense held Pribula to 168 passing yards on 32 attempts and he was sacked ten times. In his early-week press conference, head coach Tony Elliott said that Pribula is still his starter with no change on the horizon. But if Pribula can't use his legs (which he clearly couldn't last week while getting sacked ten times), he's simply not a good enough passer to be a top-level QB in the ACC. Syracuse made a somewhat-surprising change at quarterback ahead of last week's game against UConn, benching starter Steve Angeli in favor of Kennesaw State transfer Amari Odom. Odom rewarded his coach's confidence, going 27-of-37 through the air for 335 passing yards with five touchdowns against the Huskies. While averaging over 103 penalty yards per game (practically double the national average), the Orange have been a VERY tough team to trust. But with a 9.5-point head start and QB questions on the other side, Syracuse suddenly looks a little more attractive. The Orange had a three-touchdown lead last week against UConn before taking the foot off the gas in the final frame. What would this spread be if Syracuse finished that result in more-convincing fashion?
Play Syracuse
10/10 6:41 AM PDT — Syracuse's top two quarterbacks are now doubtful. Steve Angeli is not expected to play this week while he deals with a foot injury. Kennesaw State transfer Amari Odom went 27-of-37 through the air for 335 passing yards with five touchdowns against UConn last week, but he's now listed as questionable. Well-traveled former five-star recruit Malachi Nelson is expected to get the nod this week.
| Syracuse | 24.3 / 29.7 | -5.3 | 29 | 28 | 0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Virginia | 25.3 / 26.3 | -1 | 18 | 29 | -10 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Syracuse | 10-03 | @ Connectic. | -6.5 | 51.5 | 42-41 | Virginia | 10-03 | @ Florida S. | PK | 51.5 | 7-38 |
| | 09-17 | @ Pittsburg. | +10.5 | 51 | 13-27 | | 09-26 | Delaware | -20 | 52 | 42-3 |
| | 09-12 | California | -4 | 57 | 18-21 | | 09-19 | West Virg. | -10.5 | 51.5 | 27-38 |
| Syracuse |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | New Hampshire | -35.5 | W | 66-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | California | -4 | L | 18-21 | UN | 57 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 12-7 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-17-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 10.5 | L | 13-27 | UN | 51 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Connecticut | -6.5 | L | 42-41 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-7 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 27-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:5-0 , PSR:5-0 , O/U:2-2-1 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | NC State | -4 | W | 34-8 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -2.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Norfolk St | -47 | W | 59-3 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 28-3 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | West Virginia | -10.5 | L | 27-38 | OV | 51.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Delaware | -20 | W | 42-3 | UN | 52 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 11.5 | -10.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Florida State | 0 | L | 7-38 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0 | L | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Connecticut | 20 | 55.5 | 39.5 | | 41 | 31 | 1-2 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 1-1 | +8 / +12.5 | -1.5 / -0.5 |
| Temple | 27 | -3.5 | 35(1) | -5.5 | 36 | 32 | 1-2 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 2-0 | 1-2 / 1-1 | +0.7 / +1.5 | +4.5 / +5 |
UConn earned a 29-20 home win over the Owls in their last meeting in 2024. Nine of the last ten meetings between UConn and Temple have stayed under the total. First-year head coach Jason Candle wasn't exactly known for playing sexy football in the MAC, but his Huskies have been involved in some thrillers in recent weeks. UConn blew a 14-0 lead in a game that went down to the wire against Miami (Oh), then engineered a three-touchdown comeback last week to force overtime against Syracuse. Wide receiver Javon Brown was taken off the field in a stretcher during last week's game against the Orange. Brown, who is averaging 14.4 yards per reception with two touchdowns this season, has returned to campus but should be considered a longshot to play in this game. If you're running on fumes and energy is low, hard-nosed Temple is probably not the type of team you want to see. The Owls are a half-point away from being 5-0 against the spread this season (lost by four vs Army as a 3.5-point 'dog). K.C. Keeler continues to get improvement out of the cherry-and-white, and that was on display in last week's 17-13 upset of South Florida. Temple QB Jaxon Smolik is listed as questionable once again as he recovers from a foot injury that has forced him to miss the last three games. Ajani Sheppard has seen playing time in all five games this season, so at this point, it feels like it's Sheppard's job to lose even though Smolik entered the year as the presumed starter. Temple's rushing defense has allowed an average of 4.14 yards per carry against a respectable group of opponents.
Play the Under
10/05 12:06 PM PDT — Temple QB Jaxon Smolik is listed as questionable once again as he recovers from a foot injury that has forced him to miss the last three games. Ajani Sheppard has seen playing time in all five games this season, so at this point, it feels like it's Sheppard's job to lose even though Smolik entered the year as the presumed starter.
10/06 4:03 PM PDT — UConn wide receiver Javon Brown was taken off the field in a stretcher during last week's game against Syracuse. Brown, who is averaging 14.4 yards per reception with two touchdowns this season, has returned to campus but should be considered a longshot to play in this game.
| Connecticut | 36.7 / 28.7 | +8 | 41 | 37 | +2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Temple | 27.3 / 27.7 | -0.3 | 36 | 33 | +4.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Connecticut | 10-03 | Syracuse | +6.5 | 51.5 | 41-42 | Temple | 10-03 | @ South Flo. | +5 | 50.5 | 17-13 |
| | 09-26 | @ Miami Ohio | +2.5 | 52.5 | 21-24 | | 09-25 | Army | +3.5 | 48.5 | 17-21 |
| | 09-19 | @ So Missis. | -3.5 | 54.5 | 48-20 | | 09-19 | @ Toledo | +4.5 | 48.5 | 48-49 |
| Connecticut |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lafayette | -21.5 | W | 56-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Maryland | 11 | L | 14-38 | UN | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 7 | L | 7-17 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ So Mississippi | -3.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 54.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 27-6 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Ohio | 2.5 | L | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Syracuse | 6.5 | W | 41-42 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-6 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 14-27 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Temple |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Rhode Island | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 10-7 | OV | | | W | 24-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Penn State | 24 | W | 9-27 | UN | 49.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | W | 3-10 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Toledo | 4.5 | W | 48-49 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3 | W | 24-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-25-26 | Army | 3.5 | L | 17-21 | UN | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Florida | 5 | W | 17-13 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Old Dominion | 24 | 46 | 40.5 | | 38 | 43 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 0-3 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 2-0 | -2.7 / -27.5 | -12.5 / +9.5 |
| Appalachian St | 28 | -9 | 38.5(2) | -4 | 40 | 23 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +28.5 / -3.5 | -19 / +10 |
The home team has won each of the last five meetings in this Sun Belt showdown. App State earned a 28-20 home win in Boone in 2024, and Old Dominion returned the favor with a 24-21 home win last season. App State is coming off a bye week after previously giving NC State a quality battle. The Mountaineers are 3-1 straight-up and against the spread this season, showing some notable improvement for second-year head coach Dowell Loggains. Old Dominion's season has gone off the rails a little bit as the Monarchs are 1-4 straight-up, 0-5 against the spread with the lone win coming against FCS-level Norfolk State (failed to cover the spread by 20 points). ODU suffered a 42-10 loss at Georgia State last week, and the Monarchs' offense looks lost. With that being said, this is a tough spread to justify in our opinion. When these teams met less than 12 months ago, Old Dominion closed as a 13.5-point home favorite. Now, the Monarchs are catching 9.5 in Boone?! That is a steep adjustment. From a talent perspective, there's very little separating these programs. Each of the last three meetings have been decided by one score. Old Dominion was only a 6.5-point 'dog to James Madison two weeks ago and now they are catching a bigger number against App State?! Perhaps we've been slow to give Old Dominion the proper downgrade that they deserve, but if there was ever a "buy low" spot, this is it.
Play Old Dominion
| Old Dominion | 15.7 / 36 | -20.3 | 37 | 35 | +2 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Appalachian St | 28 / 28.7 | -0.7 | 39 | 35 | +1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Old Dominion | 10-03 | @ Georgia S. | +1 | 51.5 | 10-42 | Appalachian St | 09-26 | @ NC State | +13 | 56 | 31-41 |
| | 09-26 | James Mad. | +7 | 44 | 20-46 | | 09-19 | Charlotte | -16.5 | 52.5 | 26-21 |
| | 09-19 | East Caro. | -2.5 | 49 | 17-20 | | 09-12 | @ East Caro. | +6.5 | 55.5 | 27-24 |
|
| 10-25-25 | Appalachian St | 21 | 62 | 23 | 18/73 | 32/54/2/301 | 0/0 |
| Old Dominion | 24 | -13.5 | 26 | 45/149 | 21/35/1/310 | 2/0 |
| 11-02-24 | Old Dominion | 20 | -2.5 | 26 | 36/166 | 27/38/1/332 | 3/3 |
| Appalachian St | 28 | 58 | 20 | 34/184 | 13/24/1/212 | 0/0 |
| Old Dominion |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:0-5 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:4-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Norfolk St | -41.5 | L | 31-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 18 | L | 21-44 | OV | 47.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | L | 6-34 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | East Carolina | -2.5 | L | 17-20 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | James Madison | 7 | L | 20-46 | OV | 44 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | L | 17-30 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia State | 1 | L | 10-42 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Appalachian St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Maine | -21 | W | 55-3 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ East Carolina | 6.5 | W | 27-24 | UN | 55.5 | 3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13 | 4 | W | 17-10 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Charlotte | -16.5 | L | 26-21 | UN | 52.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -9.5 | L | 13-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ NC State | 13 | W | 31-41 | OV | 56 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | L | 10-28 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kent State | 17 | 43.5 | 48 | | 48 | 41 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 3-0 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 2-0 | +10.3 / -56.5 | -3 / +44 |
| Western Michigan | 24 | -14 | 36(1) | -13 | 36 | 51 | 1-1 / 2-1 | 1-1 / 1-2 | 1-1 / 1-2 | +5 / +3 | -11 / +2.5 |
Surprisingly, these MAC foes have only met one time since 2021. Western Michigan has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings, with the last one played in October 2024. The Broncos found the win column last week at Buffalo, but it certainly wasn't pretty. WMU has failed to cover the number in each of its last three games, and nearly lost as a two-touchdown favorite last week. Kent State is coming off a 13-10 home loss to Ohio, and while the Flashes did cover the spread as a 3.5-point 'dog, that wasn't a great performance against the Bobcats team that can't find a quarterback. It certainly isn't our favorite play on this week's slate, but we can only look in Kent State's direction. Western Michigan's offense has scored an average of 16.8 points per game against FBS-level competition this season. Compared to previous versions of the Kent State defense, this Golden Flashes unit has held up fairly well. You don't get any awards for holding Ball State and Ohio to 13 points apiece, but compared to what the Flashes' defense has looked like in previous years, that's a win. Also, this uptick didn't just start a couple weeks ago. Kent State held Bowling Green to 21 and Ball State to 17 points at the end of last season. Western Michigan hasn't shown enough on offense to make us feel comfortable laying a double-digit spread like this.
Play Kent State
| Kent State | 13 / 28.3 | -15.3 | 49 | 31 | +17.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Western Michigan | 18.3 / 23.3 | -5 | 35 | 39 | -4 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Kent State | 10-03 | Ohio | +3.5 | 50.5 | 10-13 | Western Michigan | 10-03 | @ Buffalo U | -13 | 46 | 20-17 |
| | 09-26 | Ball State | -2.5 | 51.5 | 26-13 | | 09-26 | Boise Sta. | +8 | 50.5 | 7-32 |
| | 09-19 | @ Ohio State | +52 | 58.5 | 3-59 | | 09-19 | @ Rice | -7.5 | 43.5 | 28-21 |
|
| 10-26-24 | Kent State | 21 | 61 | 19 | 40/136 | 12/25/2/114 | 2/2 |
| Western Michigan | 52 | -19 | 23 | 37/358 | 17/24/1/221 | 1/0 |
| Kent State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:0-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ South Carolina | 35.5 | L | 0-57 | OV | 53 | 9.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 21 | L | 0-29 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wofford | -10 | W | 36-15 | OV | 46 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | L | 14-15 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Ohio State | 52 | L | 3-59 | OV | 58.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14.5 | 31.5 | L | 0-35 | UN | 35.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Ball State | -2.5 | W | 26-13 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1 | W | 17-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio | 3.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Western Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Michigan | 27.5 | W | 12-13 | UN | 50.5 | 7 | W | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Monmouth | -29.5 | W | 49-14 | OV | 54.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rice | -7.5 | L | 28-21 | OV | 43.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Boise State | 8 | L | 7-32 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-8 | UN | 9.5 | 4.5 | L | 0-15 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Buffalo U | -13 | L | 20-17 | UN | 46 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/07 12:12 am |
| Duke | 31 | -4.5 | 18.5 | -6 | 20 | 55 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 1-0 | +32.3 / +4 | -20.5 / +6 |
| Georgia Tech | 17 | 45.5 | 26.5(2) | | 23 | 32 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 0-3 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 1-0 | +3.7 / -7 | -11 / -3 |
Georgia Tech has won each of the last five meetings, including a 27-18 road win in Durham as a 3.5-point 'dog last season. Each of the last four meetings between the Blue Devils and Yellow Jackets have stayed under the total. Both teams are coming off bye weeks - One team desperately needed one while the other probably wouldn't have minded to stay in rhythm. Duke is 4-0 straight-up and against the spread, out-scoring its four opponents by a combined margin of 145-44. The Blue Devils earned a 35-7 home win over Stanford three weeks ago, and that same Cardinal team turned around and beat Georgia Tech one week later. The Ramblin' Wreck have been both ramblin' and a wreck this season, going 1-3 straight-up, 0-4 against the spread. Georgia Tech's lone win came vs FCS-level Mercer (but did not cover). We have no interest in stepping in front of the Blue Devils' train right now. Manny Diaz has pushed the right buttons thus far, and he shouldn't have to dig very far for some motivation angles this week. Duke out-gained Georgia Tech by 65 yards and held a 26-21 advantage in first downs last season, but lost on a 100-yard fumble recovery that went the other way as Darian Mensah (now at Miami) was going into the end zone. Let's play a quick game of Which of These is Not Like the Other: 6, 7, 34, 3. The 6, 7 and 3 represent how many points Stanford scored against Miami, Duke and Wake Forest this season. The 34 represents how many points Stanford scored against Georgia Tech. You don't need much more context than that.
Play Duke
| Duke | 42.7 / 13.7 | +29 | 20 | 34 | -15.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Georgia Tech | 31.7 / 30 | +1.7 | 22 | 33 | -9.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Duke | 09-26 | William &. | -42.5 | 61.5 | 62-7 | Georgia Tech | 09-26 | @ Stanford | -3 | 48 | 27-34 |
| | 09-19 | Stanford | -10 | 51.5 | 35-7 | | 09-19 | Mercer | -38.5 | 57.5 | 44-11 |
| | 09-12 | @ Illinois | +6 | 51.5 | 31-27 | | 09-12 | Tennessee. | +12.5 | 55.5 | 24-45 |
|
| 10-18-25 | Georgia Tech | 27 | 61 | 21 | 36/171 | 14/21/0/205 | 0/0 |
| Duke | 18 | -3.5 | 26 | 32/68 | 32/44/0/373 | 2/1 |
| Duke |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tulane | -9.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 51.5 | -3 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Illinois | 6 | W | 31-27 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Stanford | -10 | W | 35-7 | UN | 51.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | William & Mary | -42.5 | W | 62-7 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 38-7 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Colorado | -6.5 | L | 13-14 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Tennessee U | 12.5 | L | 24-45 | OV | 55.5 | 3.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 13 | 6.5 | L | 10-24 | OV | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Mercer | -38.5 | L | 44-11 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 24-3 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Stanford | -3 | L | 27-34 | OV | 48 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 20-10 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Minnesota U | 27 | -2.5 | 19 | -7 | 20 | 13 | 3-1 / 1-0 | 3-1 / 1-0 | 1-3 / 1-0 | +16.8 / +3 | -14.5 / +12 |
| Purdue | 21 | 48.5 | 27(1) | | 27 | 18 | 1-2 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 1-1 | 3-0 / 1-1 | -5.3 / -3.5 | -2 / +11.5 |
GoldSheet prides itself on being the country's longest-running sports betting newsletter in the country, and when you've been around as long as we have, you get to watch the industry change. If you're curious on how the betting market has evolved in recent years, look no further than this game. Minnesota has just won-and-covered its last three games, including a pair of outright upset wins over Washington and Michigan. Gophers' head coach PJ Fleck created some postgame celebrations that we've never seen before. Dating back to last season, the Gophers have covered the spread in seven of their last eight games. Purdue went 2-10 last season and the Boilermakers lost by 39 against Notre Dame two weeks ago. Surely, with everything that we just laid out, Minnesota is a pretty hefty favorite this week, right?! In years past, contrarian bettors would have been lining up to take the Boilermakers at +6(?) or +4.5(?), trying to catch the Gophers after a big win last week. For all intents and purposes, those days are mostly over. Oddsmakers are well aware of where the betting market wants to turn in games like this, and instead of getting +6 (where our power ratings are), bettors are left to decide if they want +2.5. The days of bettors trying to squeeze value out of spots like this has quickly dwindled as the market has become more sophisticated. There will likely still be bettors looking to play Purdue this week, but if you asked most pundits at the beginning of the season, "Would you lay -2.5 with Minnesota against Purdue?" that's a wager most would sign up for. A couple of weeks ago, we would have had the Gophers favored by more than a touchdown in this spot. We understand the temptation to take Purdue, but that appeal is already being baked into the spread.
Play Minnesota
| Minnesota U | 29.3 / 15 | +14.3 | 21 | 27 | -1.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Purdue | 24 / 39.3 | -15.3 | 27 | 13 | +16.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Minnesota U | 10-03 | Michigan | +6.5 | 42 | 20-14 | Purdue | 10-03 | @ Illinois | +9 | 62 | 24-17 |
| | 09-26 | @ Washingto. | +12 | 45 | 27-24 | | 09-26 | Notre Dame | +27 | 57 | 10-49 |
| | 09-19 | Akron | -22.5 | 48.5 | 41-7 | | 09-19 | @ UCLA | +13.5 | 53 | 38-52 |
|
| 10-11-25 | Purdue | 20 | 49.5 | 25 | 40/253 | 21/42/3/203 | 1/1 |
| Minnesota U | 27 | -7 | 17 | 18/30 | 21/45/1/232 | 0/0 |
| Minnesota U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-1-1 |
| 09-03-26 | Eastern Illinois | -42.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 52.5 | 0 | W | 14-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 35-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Mississippi St | 1 | L | 13-38 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | L | 6-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Akron | -22.5 | W | 41-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington U | 12 | W | 27-24 | OV | 45 | 2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 23 |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan | 6.5 | W | 20-14 | UN | 42 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 7-14 | P | 21 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Purdue |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Indiana State | -35 | L | 44-19 | OV | 56 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 16-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Wake Forest | 2.5 | W | 36-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 1 | L | 10-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ UCLA | 13.5 | L | 38-52 | OV | 53 | 4.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Notre Dame | 27 | L | 10-49 | OV | 57 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 16.5 | L | 0-35 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Illinois | 9 | W | 24-17 | UN | 62 | 2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 6 | W | 13-7 | UN | 31 |
| 10-10-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rice | 13 | 46.5 | 44 | | 44 | 28 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 3-0 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 1-1 | +6.3 / -33 | -1 / +28.5 |
| East Carolina | 24 | -10 | 34.5(2) | -11.5 | 33 | 55 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 1-1 | +15 / -17.5 | -22 / +15.5 |
Rice won-and-covered the lone meeting between these squads in 2023 since they became conference mates in The American. East Carolina is coming off a bye, which is a nice opportunity to prep for the Owls' unique rushing offense. ECU entered the bye following back-to-back wins over Old Dominion and North Carolina Central. That 20-17 win over ODU looked fine at the time, but considering the Monarchs have lost their last two games by a combined margin of 88-30, a three-point win by the Pirates suddenly loses some luster. Ultimately, we are interested in the under in this contest. Dating back to the end of last season, five of East Carolina's last six games have stayed under the total. The Pirates have a history of producing a good defensive line and ECU is typically stout against the run. It's certainly not an apples-to-apples comparison, but ECU held Army’s rushing attack to six points last season. The under is 5-2 in the Owls' last seven games, and one of those "over" results came against Western Michigan when the Owls scored a not-so-meaningless TD with eight seconds remaining in a game that was essentially over. Rice was only able to generate 13 first downs last week against UTSA, and we're expecting a similar offensive output in this one.
Play the Under
| Rice | 19.7 / 27.3 | -7.7 | 45 | 30 | +10.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| East Carolina | 28.7 / 17.7 | +11 | 33 | 44 | -14 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Rice | 10-03 | Tex San A. | +11.5 | 56 | 14-16 | East Carolina | 09-26 | NC Central | -37.5 | 58 | 42-9 |
| | 09-26 | @ Fresno St. | +12 | 43 | 24-38 | | 09-19 | @ Old Domin. | +2.5 | 49 | 20-17 |
| | 09-19 | Western M. | +7.5 | 43.5 | 21-28 | | 09-12 | Appalachi. | -6.5 | 55.5 | 24-27 |
| Rice |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Houston Baptist | -22.5 | W | 31-3 | UN | 47.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Notre Dame | 44.5 | L | 0-52 | UN | 54.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14 | 26.5 | L | 0-42 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Western Michigan | 7.5 | W | 21-28 | OV | 43.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Fresno State | 12 | L | 24-38 | OV | 43 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Tex San Antonio | 11.5 | W | 14-16 | UN | 56 | 3.5 | W | 7-6 | OV | 12.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-16 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| East Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Alabama | 28 | L | 10-48 | OV | 52.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 16.5 | L | 7-38 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Appalachian St | -6.5 | L | 24-27 | UN | 55.5 | -3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13 | -4 | L | 10-17 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Old Dominion | 2.5 | W | 20-17 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | NC Central | -37.5 | L | 42-9 | UN | 58 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 42-3 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miami Ohio | 20 | -6 | 41 | -0.5 | 36 | 47 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 2-0 | +12.3 / -24.5 | -14.5 / +15.5 |
| Massachusetts | 27 | 44.5 | 42.5(1) | | 44 | 46 | 2-1 / 2-0 | 1-2 / 2-0 | 1-2 / 1-1 | +8.3 / +22.5 | -20 / +12 |
Well UMass, you gave us a fun ride. After a surprising 4-0 start, the Minutemen came crashing back to earth last week against Eastern Michigan. UMass lost 38-13 as a 5.5-point home favorite, showing that victories over Rutgers, Sacred Heart, Stonehill and Sacramento State don't hold quite the same value as they used to. The final score certainly wasn't pretty (-2 turnover differential a big reason why), but the Minutemen didn't play THAT bad against the Eagles. Pop Watson went 20-of-27 through the air for 210 yards and a touchdown. Curtis Kimmons IV generated 5.2 yards per carry and scored a touchdown. UMass actually had a better yards per play differential (+0.1). We would like to paint the same optimistic picture for the RedHawks, but that might be a little tougher. Miami is down to D-II transfer Caleb Heavner at quarterback. Heavner played fine in his debut last week against Bowling Green, but the RedHawks didn't find the end zone until halfway through the fourth quarter as Miami lost as a double-digit favorite. Following a plethora of injuries, the Miami team that put a scare into Cincinnati three weeks ago doesn't look like it's going to be making an appearance in Oxford any time soon.
Play UMass
10/10 6:38 AM PDT — UMass QB Pop Watson III is dealing with a foot injury and is no longer expected to play this week.
| Miami Ohio | 25 / 26.7 | -1.7 | 35 | 38 | +0.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Massachusetts | 28.3 / 19.3 | +9 | 41 | 51 | -14 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Miami Ohio | 10-03 | Bowling G. | -10 | 41.5 | 20-24 | Massachusetts | 10-03 | Eastern M. | -5.5 | 48.5 | 14-38 |
| | 09-26 | Connectic. | -2.5 | 52.5 | 24-21 | | 09-26 | @ Sacrament. | -6 | 49 | 35-6 |
| | 09-19 | @ Cincinnat. | +14.5 | 51 | 31-35 | | 09-19 | Stonehill | -31 | 51 | 36-14 |
| Miami Ohio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 16.5 | L | 14-59 | OV | 48 | 3.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 10 | 9.5 | L | 14-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Holy Cross | -30.5 | W | 45-7 | OV | 47 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Cincinnati U | 14.5 | W | 31-35 | OV | 51 | 3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10 | 7.5 | W | 28-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Connecticut | -2.5 | W | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Bowling Green | -10 | L | 20-24 | OV | 41.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 6-10 | UN | 21 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Massachusetts |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Rutgers | 29.5 | W | 37-21 | OV | 55 | 7.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 17.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Sacred Heart | -23.5 | W | 37-10 | UN | 53.5 | | W | 17-0 | OV | | | W | 23-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Stonehill | -31 | L | 36-14 | UN | 51 | | W | 13-7 | OV | | | W | 13-7 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Sacramento State | -6 | W | 35-6 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 21-6 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Eastern Michigan | -5.5 | L | 14-38 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| James Madison | 31 | -7 | 26 | -12.5 | 27 | 42 | 3-0 / 2-0 | 3-0 / 2-0 | 2-1 / 1-1 | +39.7 / +19.5 | -22.5 / -2 |
| Georgia Southern | 27 | 51.5 | 39.5(1) | | 39 | 43 | 1-1 / 1-2 | 2-0 / 2-1 | 1-1 / 2-1 | +8.5 / -4 | -6 / +7 |
Since James Madison made the jump from the FCS level, the home team has won-and-covered all four meetings between the Dukes and Eagles. Georgia Southern earned outright upset victories as a home 'dog in 2022 and 2024. JMU got a bit of revenge last season, beating the Eagles by 25 with a 479-192 edge in total yards. Georgia Southern enters the contest following a much-needed win over Coastal Carolina last week. The Eagles have covered the spread in six of their last seven games, but Clay Helton's squad was still seeking its first win over an FBS-level opponent before beating the Chanticleers in Conway last week. The Eagles' last three games have gone over the total. James Madison is 5-0 straight-up and against the spread following last week's win over Marshall. Since beating Liberty in a 20-13 slog in the opener, the Dukes have scored an average of 51.0 points per game over the last four weeks. Each of the last three meetings between these Sun Belt rivals have stayed under the total, however, the 53.5 that we're seeing in the market is lower than any total we've seen between these teams since the series began. We're inclined to look toward the over. Georgia Southern's game against Clemson featured a lengthy weather delay, so you can largely throw that game out. Over the last three weeks against comparable competition, the Eagles have seen 58 points against Jacksonville State, 70 points against Houston and 55 points against Coastal Carolina. Also, James Madison is at the point of the season where style points might begin to matter a little bit. The Dukes didn't play a premier non-conference game this season, so if they want to attract the attention of the College Football Playoff committee, it will have to be done during Sun Belt play. A non-conference schedule featuring UConn, Liberty, San Diego State and Wagner probably isn't moving the needle, but a convincing road win at night on an ESPN network will.
Play the Over
| James Madison | 39 / 16.7 | +22.3 | 26 | 35 | -6 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Georgia Southern | 28.7 / 32.3 | -3.7 | 39 | 33 | +6 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| James Madison | 10-03 | Marshall | -14.5 | 55.5 | 45-17 | Georgia Southern | 10-03 | @ Coastal C. | -2.5 | 53 | 31-24 |
| | 09-26 | @ Old Domin. | -7 | 44 | 46-20 | | 09-26 | Houston U | +17 | 56.5 | 28-42 |
| | 09-19 | @ San Diego. | +3 | 46.5 | 26-13 | | 09-19 | @ Jacksonvi. | +3.5 | 51.5 | 27-31 |
|
| 09-27-25 | Georgia Southern | 10 | 54.5 | 10 | 25/32 | 14/24/0/165 | 2/0 |
| James Madison | 35 | -15 | 29 | 50/343 | 11/22/0/148 | 0/0 |
| 10-19-24 | James Madison | 14 | -10 | 16 | 32/67 | 22/41/0/186 | 1/0 |
| Georgia Southern | 28 | 58.5 | 24 | 40/190 | 24/33/3/215 | 1/1 |
| James Madison |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-0 , PSR:5-0 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:5-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:5-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Liberty | -6 | W | 20-13 | UN | 51 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wagner | -46.5 | W | 87-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 42-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Diego State | 3 | W | 26-13 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 19-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Old Dominion | -7 | W | 46-20 | OV | 44 | -0.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | W | 30-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Marshall | -14.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 55.5 | -5.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -9 | W | 38-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia Southern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Charleston Southern | -28.5 | W | 31-0 | UN | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 24-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Clemson | 19.5 | W | 7-22 | UN | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11 | W | 7-16 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 3.5 | L | 27-31 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 24-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Houston U | 17 | W | 28-42 | OV | 56.5 | 4.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 10 | L | 14-28 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | -2.5 | W | 31-24 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -1 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Central Florida | 24 | 53.5 | 27 | | 27 | 17 | 3-0 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 1-0-1 | 2-1 / 0-2 | +29.7 / -7.5 | -19 / +8.5 |
| Oklahoma State | 38 | -10 | 21.5(2) | -7.5 | 23 | 26 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +33.5 / +1.5 | -16 / -5.5 |
UCF has won both meetings with the Cowboys since joining the Big XII, including a 17-14 home win last season. Despite the closer-than-expected score, UCF out-gained Oklahoma State by 168 yards in last year's contest. The Pokes are coming off their bye week after rattling off three-straight wins over Oregon, Murray State and West Virginia. Dating back to the end of last season, Oklahoma State is 7-1 against the spread over its last eight games with the lone loss coming in the season opener against Tulsa. UCF blew a 17-point lead last week at Houston. The Knights held the Cougars out of the end zone for nearly three quarters, but Houston went on a 27-0 run to close the game. UCF quarterback Alonza Barnett is not expected to return this week as he recovers from a hamstring injury. Florida International transfer Keyone Jenkins has completed 69.7-percent of his passes to go along with three rushing touchdowns in relief duty thus far. From a power ratings perspective, this game is getting a little out of our comfort zone. Obviously this year's Oklahoma State team is considerably better than last year's, but UCF closed as a 13.5-point home favorite against the 'Pokes and now the Knights are the double-digit 'dog. That's tough to swing, but at the same time, UCF's 2026 resume isn't holding up very well. The Knights scored seven points against a Pitt defense that just allowed 33 to Virginia Tech last week. For all intents and purposes, UCF hasn't produced a signature win for Scott Frost since crushing North Carolina in Week 4 last season. There's been a win here and a good showing there, but the Knights don't have much to hang their hat on since Frost's return. That’s a tough pill to swallow when you consider how quickly other programs (like Oklahoma State!) are finding immediate success.
10/05 12:22 PM PDT — UCF quarterback Alonza Barnett is not expected to return this week as he recovers from a hamstring injury. Florida International transfer Keyone Jenkins has completed 69.7-percent of his passes to go along with three rushing touchdowns in relief duty thus far.
| Central Florida | 27.3 / 23.3 | +4 | 28 | 28 | -1.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Oklahoma State | 46.3 / 18.3 | +28 | 24 | 28 | -10 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Central Florida | 10-03 | @ Houston U | +10 | 50 | 17-27 | Oklahoma State | 09-26 | @ West Virg. | +2 | 60.5 | 41-24 |
| | 09-26 | TCU | +3.5 | 48 | 21-13 | | 09-19 | Murray St. | -55.5 | 70 | 59-0 |
| | 09-19 | Georgia S. | -17.5 | 50.5 | 44-30 | | 09-12 | Oregon | +24 | 55.5 | 39-31 |
|
| 11-22-25 | Oklahoma State | 14 | 47.5 | 12 | 30/104 | 13/28/1/124 | 0/0 |
| Central Florida | 17 | -13.5 | 16 | 34/128 | 16/25/2/271 | 3/0 |
| Central Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-1-1 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:4-0-1 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-2-1 |
| 09-03-26 | Bethune Cookman | -43.5 | W | 73-6 | OV | 58.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 38-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 7 | W | 7-12 | UN | 55 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 13 | 4.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia State | -17.5 | L | 44-30 | OV | 50.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 20-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | TCU | 3.5 | W | 21-13 | UN | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2 | W | 14-10 | P | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Houston U | 10 | PK | 17-27 | UN | 50 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oklahoma State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Tulsa | -12.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 57.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 3-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Oregon | 24 | W | 39-31 | OV | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | W | 24-17 | OV | 30 |
| 09-19-26 | Murray State | -55.5 | W | 59-0 | UN | 70 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ West Virginia | 2 | W | 41-24 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13 | 0.5 | L | 13-14 | UN | 31 |
| 10-10-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana | 27 | 48 | 36 | | 37 | 39 | 3-0 / 1-1 | 1-1-1 / 2-0 | 0-3 / 1-1 | +13.7 / +4 | -11 / +11 |
| Louisiana Tech | 19 | -3 | 37(1) | PK | 38 | 31 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 2-0 / 2-0 | +38 / -24 | -22.5 / +27.5 |
This will be the first meeting between the Bulldogs and Ragin' Cajuns since 2015. Both teams are coming off nice victories last week as Louisiana handles Arkansas State while La Tech beat Army. The Cajuns couldn't get bettors to the window last week as a 4.5-point road favorite, but nonetheless, Louisiana is still 9-5 against the spread dating back to last season. Things are also looking good in Ruston where the Bulldogs are 4-0 against the spread this season, with all four of those contests going over the total. Louisiana Tech's Blake Baker has been re-named the starting QB ahead of this game. Baker has missed the last two games as he recovers from a hand injury. Baker's back-up, Trey Kukuk, suffered an ankle injury in last week's game against Army and he is not expected to be available this week. In addition to Alabama-Georgia, this is another game that could potentially be impacted by the tropical storm picking up steam in the Gulf. Be sure to check for any potential venue changes or schedule updates. We already lean in Louisiana's direction, and that feeling will only grow stronger if this game is played in adverse conditions. The Cajuns are generating an average of 199.6 rushing yards per game this season, which is top-35 in the country. Lunch Winfield ran 14 times last week against Arkansas State, and he would have no problem running a ground-heavy offense in this one. La Tech's defense just had to defend 45 rushing attempts by Army last week. Is that unit looking forward to facing a 6-foot-2, 225-pound QB named Lunch after dealing with the triple option last week? Probably not.
Play Louisiana
10/05 11:57 AM PDT — Louisiana Tech's Blake Baker has been re-named the starting QB ahead of this game. Baker has missed the last two games as he recovers from a hand injury. Baker's back-up, Trey Kukuk, suffered an ankle injury in last week's game against Army and he is not expected to be available this week.
10/06 5:11 PM PDT — In addition to Alabama-Georgia, this is another game that could potentially be impacted by the tropical storm picking up steam in the Gulf. Be sure to check for any potential venue changes or schedule updates.
| Louisiana | 26 / 13.7 | +12.3 | 36 | 44 | -7 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Louisiana Tech | 21.3 / 36.7 | -15.3 | 37 | 20 | +18.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Louisiana | 10-03 | Arkansas . | -5 | 49 | 23-20 | Louisiana Tech | 10-03 | Army | PK | 46.5 | 31-29 |
| | 09-26 | @ Charlotte | -9 | 49 | 34-7 | | 09-19 | @ Baylor | +20.5 | 50.5 | 19-36 |
| | 09-19 | UAB | -7 | 55.5 | 21-14 | | 09-12 | @ LSU | +34.5 | 55 | 14-45 |
| Louisiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-1-1 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lamar | -20.5 | W | 38-7 | UN | 48.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ USC | 30.5 | W | 30-49 | OV | 59 | 7.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 18.5 | W | 10-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UAB | -7 | PK | 21-14 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Charlotte | -9 | W | 34-7 | UN | 49 | -2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -5.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas St | -5 | L | 23-20 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 7-10 | UN | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northwestern State | -44.5 | W | 80-6 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 63-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ LSU | 34.5 | W | 14-45 | OV | 55 | 9.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 21.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Baylor | 20.5 | W | 19-36 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 11.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Army | 0 | W | 31-29 | OV | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | W | 14-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ball State | 13 | 53.5 | 48.5 | | 49 | 35 | 1-1 / 0-3 | 2-0 / 0-3 | 2-0 / 2-1 | +4.5 / -34 | +3.5 / +22.5 |
| Northwestern | 42 | -34.5 | 18(2) | -32.5 | 20 | 15 | 3-0 / 0-1 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +23.7 / -6 | -5 / +20.5 |
If you build it, they will come. Ryan Field is exactly 200 miles away from the Field of Dreams site in Dyersville, Iowa and Northwestern had to be encouraged by the national reaction to the debut of the Wildcats' new home. They built it. They came. And they whipped Penn State last Friday. Northwestern couldn't ask for a better recruiting pitch as the nation became enamored with the Wildcat Wall and the soccer stadium-like feel of the new venue on the shores of Lake Michigan. This current group of Purple 'Cats doesn't seem like the kind of team that will get wrapped up in its own headlines, but nonetheless, this is obviously a sleepy spot against an inferior MAC opponent. Northwestern is 3-1 straight-up, 4-0 against the spread this season with the lone loss coming by a touchdown against the defending national champs from Bloomington. Our preferred look in this contest would be toward the over. If offensive coordinator Chip Kelly feels the need to make a point, Northwestern can probably flirt with this number on its own. Ball State can likely make a modest contribution toward the total now that starting QB Keldric Luster is back in the mix. Luster did not play in the Cardinals' 26-13 loss at Kent State, but he returned last week against Toledo and the uptick in offensive production was obvious. Luster was 21-of-33 through the air for 224 yards and two touchdowns against the Rockets. It might come in garbage time, but Ball State's offense can make a small contribution toward the final tally.
Play the Over
| Ball State | 17.3 / 38.7 | -21.3 | 49 | 40 | +12.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Northwestern | 32.7 / 16.3 | +16.3 | 21 | 15 | +6.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-0 / 1-0 |
| Ball State | 10-03 | Toledo | +20.5 | 53 | 24-39 | Northwestern | 10-02 | Penn State | +3 | 47 | 34-13 |
| | 09-26 | @ Kent State | +2.5 | 51.5 | 13-26 | | 09-25 | @ Indiana | +20.5 | 49.5 | 23-29 |
| | 09-19 | @ Liberty | +14.5 | 49.5 | 15-51 | | 09-19 | Colorado | -3.5 | 48 | 41-7 |
| Ball State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Ohio State | 50 | L | 3-56 | OV | 55.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 28.5 | W | 3-28 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Stony Brook | -13.5 | W | 41-17 | OV | 52 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Liberty | 14.5 | L | 15-51 | OV | 49.5 | 4.5 | L | 7-13 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 7-23 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kent State | 2.5 | L | 13-26 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 1 | L | 0-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Toledo | 20.5 | W | 24-39 | OV | 53 | 6.5 | W | 7-6 | UN | 13.5 | 10.5 | W | 10-15 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Northwestern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-0-2 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | South Dakota St | -14 | W | 34-18 | OV | 49.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 10-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Colorado | -3.5 | W | 41-7 | P | 48 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 21-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Indiana | 20.5 | W | 23-29 | OV | 49.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-2 | UN | 10.5 | 11.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Penn State | 3 | W | 34-13 | P | 47 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 23 |
| 10-10-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas A&M | 31 | 50.5 | 13.5 | | 11 | 25 | 3-1 / 0-1 | 3-1 / 0-1 | 2-2 / 0-1 | +23.8 / -29 | -21 / +8 |
| Missouri | 27 | -4.5 | 15(2) | -0.5 | 15 | 9 | 3-0 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 1-1 | +26 / +5 | -25.5 / -0.5 |
Texas A&M has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings, including a 38-17 road win at Missouri last season. The Aggies out-gained the Tigers 464-284 as Missouri was forced to play with a back-up QB. While the Tigers should have been celebrating last week's win over top-10 Florida, the mood in Columbia took a somber tone this week as Missouri head coach Eli Drinkwitz announced that freshman offensive lineman DJ Jones needs a heart transplant. Drinkwitz was fighting back tears in his press conference while describing Jones' dire situation. Missouri will undoubtedly be playing hard for Jones, but we're struggling to justify a point spread over a field goal in this matchup. Marcel Reed and the Aggies' offense got some confidence back last week, crushing Arkansas 34-7. Reed played a clean game with no turnovers, finding seven different receivers through out the course of the night. That Week 3 loss to Kentucky doesn't look QUITE as bad after the Wildcats went to South Carolina and beat the Gamecocks last week. As we go to print on Tuesday night, we're watching Troy host Southern Miss. We can't help but raise an eyebrow to the fact that Missouri scored 27 points against the Trojans in Week 3. Southern Miss scored 27 points against the Trojans on Tuesday...in the first three quarters. Yes, the Tigers' performance against Florida was certainly impressive, but we're only a couple weeks removed from Missouri generating 230 total yards and 13 first downs against Troy. The Aggies have been a tough team to trust, but we're struggling to justify this point spread north of a field goal.
Play Texas A&M
| Texas A&M | 20.3 / 24.3 | -4 | 12 | 18 | -7.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Missouri | 32 / 21.7 | +10.3 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Texas A&M | 10-03 | Arkansas | -13.5 | 51 | 34-7 | Missouri | 10-03 | Florida | +5.5 | 58 | 45-17 |
| | 09-26 | @ LSU | +8 | 52.5 | 6-35 | | 09-26 | @ Mississip. | +3.5 | 58.5 | 24-31 |
| | 09-19 | Kentucky | -17 | 48.5 | 21-31 | | 09-19 | Troy | -26.5 | 49.5 | 27-17 |
|
| 11-08-25 | Texas A&M | 38 | -6.5 | 21 | 39/243 | 20/29/0/221 | 1/1 |
| Missouri | 17 | 48 | 17 | 34/207 | 7/22/0/77 | 3/2 |
| Texas A&M |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Missouri State | -38.5 | W | 50-0 | UN | 53.5 | -10.5 | L | 9-0 | UN | 14 | -24.5 | L | 19-0 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona State | -14.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 51.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kentucky | -17 | L | 21-31 | OV | 48.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -9.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ LSU | 8 | L | 6-35 | UN | 52.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas | -13.5 | W | 34-7 | UN | 51 | -3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 9.5 | -7 | W | 24-7 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Citadel | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Missouri |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Arkansas Pine Bluff | -55.5 | L | 54-14 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 40-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | @ Kansas | -4.5 | W | 38-21 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | L | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Troy | -26.5 | L | 27-17 | UN | 49.5 | -7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -15 | L | 24-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Mississippi St | 3.5 | L | 24-31 | UN | 58.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Florida | 5.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 58 | 0.5 | W | 3-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | W | 20-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UAB | 14 | 55 | 39.5 | | 41 | 55 | 3-0 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 1-0-1 | 0-3 / 1-1 | +9.7 / -13 | -11 / +16.5 |
| Memphis | 34 | -15 | 26.5(2) | -15 | 26 | 52 | 2-0 / 2-1 | 1-1 / 2-1 | 2-0 / 2-1 | +21 / +13 | -22 / -1.5 |
ANALYSIS UPDATED ON THURSDAY MORNING: Memphis had won-and-covered each of the last three meetings between these squads before UAB pulled a shocking 31-24 upset as a 23.5-point 'dog last season. That contest was the debut for both UAB head coach Alex Mortensen and QB Ryder Burton, who are still paired together in Birmingham. After entering the year with a regular season win total of 3.5, the Blazers are already knocking on the doorstep following a 3-2 start. UAB was probably able to get some extra prep time for this matchup after hosting Samford as a 31.5-point favorite last week. The same is probably true in Memphis where the Tigers had very little to worry about last week in a 51-point win over Charlotte. These teams have landed on opposite sides of the totals spectrum this season. Memphis' last four games have all gone over the total. UAB's last four games have all stayed under the total. There's been a good-news, bad-news change to the tropical storm forecast as we head into Thursday morning. The good news is that the storm appears to be moving faster than originally anticipated and will likely clear the Florida-Alabama coast before pre-game festivities get under way for Saturday's marquee matchup between the Bulldogs and Crimson Tide in Tuscaloosa. With the storm moving faster than anticipated, that likely pushes it closer to Tennessee in time for this game. Assuming this game gets played as-scheduled, we can only look in the Tigers' direction. UAB's offense is only generating 4.16 yards per carry this season, while the Tigers are averaging 6.08 yards per rush. If we see wind and rain at the Liberty Bowl, Memphis is equipped to handle those conditions much better than the Blazers are. In last year's upset of the Tigers, Burton went 20-of-27 through the air for 251 yards with three touchdowns. UAB needs to throw the ball to have any chance at shocking Memphis in back-to-back years.
Play Memphis
| UAB | 23.7 / 18.3 | +5.3 | 41 | 40 | -6 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Memphis | 41.3 / 22.3 | +19 | 26 | 42 | -14 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| UAB | 10-03 | Samford | -31 | 54.5 | 33-14 | Memphis | 10-03 | @ Charlotte | -18.5 | 52 | 59-8 |
| | 09-25 | Navy | +6.5 | 50 | 24-20 | | 09-19 | Tenn Mart. | -33.5 | 58.5 | 45-21 |
| | 09-19 | @ Louisiana | +7 | 55.5 | 14-21 | | 09-12 | @ Boise Sta. | +9.5 | 55 | 20-38 |
|
| 10-18-25 | Memphis | 24 | -23.5 | 20 | 25/119 | 22/35/1/243 | 0/0 |
| UAB | 31 | 59.5 | 25 | 40/221 | 20/27/1/251 | 1/1 |
| 11-16-24 | UAB | 18 | 62 | 16 | 20/28 | 28/44/2/324 | 2/2 |
| Memphis | 53 | -16 | 31 | 40/227 | 23/34/0/299 | 0/0 |
| UAB |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2-1 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-0-1 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Illinois | 25.5 | W | 23-42 | OV | 54 | 7 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | W | 13-21 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | UL Monroe | -9 | L | 26-20 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13 | -6 | L | 10-17 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Louisiana | 7 | PK | 14-21 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-25-26 | Navy | 6.5 | W | 24-20 | UN | 50 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 17-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Samford | -31 | L | 33-14 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 10-7 | OV | | | L | 13-14 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Memphis |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ UNLV | 4.5 | W | 27-21 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13 | 3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 28 |
| 09-05-26 | Arkansas St | -10.5 | W | 42-24 | OV | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 21-17 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Boise State | 9.5 | L | 20-38 | OV | 55 | 3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | 6 | W | 20-17 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tenn Martin | -33.5 | L | 45-21 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 24-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Charlotte | -18.5 | W | 59-8 | OV | 52 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -10.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nevada | 29 | -10 | 41 | -6 | 40 | 34 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-1 | +6.3 / -7 | +3 / -3.5 |
| UTEP | 17 | 48.5 | 49(2) | | 47 | 27 | 1-1 / 0-3 | 1-1 / 0-3 | 1-1 / 2-1 | +7.5 / -46.7 | -8 / +33 |
UTEP football might unknowingly become a political hot potato in the upcoming Texas elections, with rumors of the Miners team and their Sun Bowl (about a driver and a three-iron away from the international border) being offered to Mexico in an ongoing dispute about the boundary along the adjacent Rio Grande. Third-year head coach Scotty Walden doesn’t appear to be making any progress with the Miners, certainly not based on evidence over the past two weeks vs. Oregon State and New Mexico. The Miners were out-scored by a combined margin of 94-14 in those two contests, and if you want to throw in the final 32 minutes of the preceding game vs. Michigan, the tally is opponents 139 - UTEP 17 in just a bit more than ten quarters of football. The extent of the highlights last weekend up I-25 in Albuquerque vs. the Lobos was a late 86-yard TD run by RB Raymond Moore III, who should perhaps get a few more carries after also breaking a 79-yard TD a few weeks earlier in the last minute vs. Texas Southern. Given that the Miners trailed 44-0 at the time when Moore scored at New Mexico, however, we suggest tempering any enthusiasm, especially as the bigger problem has been Incarnate Word transfer QB EJ Colson Jr. who is hardly reminding of a past Cardinal transfer to the FBS ranks, Cam Ward. Almost half of Colson’s very modest 541 passing yards to date came in one game vs. aforementioned and outmanned FCS foe Texas Southern. If there is ever a time to risk a pick on the Wolf Pack, this might be it, though we suggest sharp objects be kept away from beleaguered third-year head coach Jeff Choate, whose team has now lost a maddening 11 one-score decisions since he took the reins at Reno in 2024. The latest was a bitter double-OT loss vs. Air Force two weeks ago. While the Pack licked its wounds in a subsequent bye week, however, the Miners were getting destroyed by the Lobos, and some Mountain West insiders believe the week off might do Nevada a world of good. Especially as the Pack’s infantry now has a very serviceable look with RBs Dominic Kelly and Herschel Turner gaining better than 6 yards per carry between them, and the offense displaying a bit more bite in the narrow losses to Middle Tennessee and Air Force behind sophomore QB Carter Jones, who piloted most of the opening-week romp past Western Kentucky and kept the offense mostly moving the past two games after missing the Montana State loss. While laying points on the road with Nevada usually isn’t on our weekly to-do list, we can make an exception for this trip to El Paso.
Play Nevada
10/12 1:12 PM PDT — UTEP starting QB EJ Colson did not play in last week's loss to Nevada after previously suffering a concussion against New Mexico. Colson is projected to return this week.
| Nevada | 20 / 27.7 | -7.7 | 40 | 45 | +2 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| UTEP | 10.3 / 48.7 | -38.3 | 47 | 24 | +23 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Nevada | 09-26 | Air Force | +4.5 | 50.5 | 33-36 | UTEP | 10-03 | @ New Mexico | +23.5 | 47.5 | 7-61 |
| | 09-19 | @ Middle Te. | -3.5 | 50.5 | 20-27 | | 09-26 | Oregon St. | +11 | 56 | 7-33 |
| | 09-12 | Montana S. | +4.5 | 51.5 | 7-20 | | 09-19 | @ Michigan | +34.5 | 48.5 | 17-52 |
| Nevada |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Kentucky | 0 | W | 49-14 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 21-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Montana State | 4.5 | L | 7-20 | UN | 51.5 | | L | 0-10 | OV | | | L | 0-17 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | -3.5 | L | 20-27 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Air Force | 4.5 | W | 33-36 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UTEP |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Oklahoma | 41 | L | 0-51 | UN | 51.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | OV | 12.5 | 24 | L | 0-27 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | Texas Southern | -26.5 | W | 51-10 | OV | 53 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Michigan | 34.5 | L | 17-52 | OV | 48.5 | 7.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 20 | W | 14-17 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon State | 11 | L | 7-33 | UN | 56 | 2.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ New Mexico | 23.5 | L | 7-61 | OV | 47.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 14 | L | 0-21 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas | 21 | 49.5 | 24 | | 25 | 47 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | +27.7 / - | -20.5 / - |
| Utah | 33 | -15.5 | 12(3) | -15 | 13 | 26 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 1-0 | +39.3 / +14 | -26 / -7.5 |
The unbeaten Utes are so hot at the moment that even Elon Musk is apparently thinking of investing, with the only question in Salt Lake City if Morgan Scalley’s troops might possibly have lost a bit of momentum with last week’s bye after four-straight rousing wins to open the campaign. We’re not sure we would bank on that, especially with the almost-perfect-symmetry of the recent win at Iowa State when Utah’s 411 yards of offense were split almost evenly between the pass (206 yards) and the run (205 yards), and RB Wayshawn Parker highlighting the latter with a blistering 174 rushing yards and two TDs (one on a 54-yard thunderbolt) vs. the Cyclones. For good measure, Scalley’s defense also ranks third nationally in scoring (only 10.3 points per game allowed) and in the top-15 nationally overall. So what’s not to like? Well, there are a few Big XII sources who are reporting some possible signs of life with the visiting Jayhawks now that sophomore QB Isaiah Marshall, with some big shoes to fill in Lawrence after the departure of now-NFL Tampa Bay Bucs starting QB Jalon Daniels, is starting to look more comfy at the controls. A dual-threat in the mold of Daniels, Marshall has been improving by the week and helped trigger a 706-yard Kansas onslaught vs. Derek Mason’s Middle Tennessee last week before Lance Leipold began subbing freely in the second half of the 55-0 blowout. Meanwhile, an earlier loss to Mizzou, when Marshall was still in his adjustment phase, suddenly doesn’t look so bad after the Tigers just clubbed top-10 Florida last week, and the offense has displayed some real balance since the loss to Eli Drinkwitz’ side, with Marshall's noted improvement and RB Dylan Edwards perhaps on his way to a 1,000-yard season. Moreover, the Jayhawks seemed to make good use of the recent bye week after the London trip to face Arizona State, using the extra days off to heal much of their walking wounded, and then playing very angry vs. the Blue Raiders when among other things piling up a 36-7 landslide edge in first downs. Sure, it’s tempting to just keep riding the Utes, who have covered every spread with room to spare, but clearing a big impost vs. an improving foe might be the time to temporarily jump off (maybe for just a week) the burgeoning Salt Lake bandwagon.
Play Kansas
| Kansas | 31 / 20.7 | +10.3 | 25 | 28 | -4 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Utah | 35.7 / 9 | +26.7 | 13 | 29 | -16 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Kansas | 10-03 | Middle Te. | -21.5 | 51 | 55-0 | Utah | 09-26 | @ Iowa State | -7.5 | 46.5 | 31-17 |
| | 09-19 | Arizona S. | +5.5 | 50.5 | 17-24 | | 09-19 | Utah State | -26.5 | 55.5 | 33-0 |
| | 09-11 | Missouri | +4.5 | 51.5 | 21-38 | | 09-12 | Arkansas | -13.5 | 55.5 | 43-10 |
|
| 11-28-25 | Utah | 31 | -10.5 | 18 | 31/161 | 15/25/0/253 | 2/1 |
| Kansas | 21 | 60.5 | 26 | 51/290 | 10/27/3/187 | 0/0 |
| Kansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-1-1 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Long Island University | -44.5 | W | 51-6 | P | 57 | | W | 6-0 | OV | | | W | 30-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | Missouri | 4.5 | L | 21-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | W | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Arizona State | 5.5 | L | 17-24 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | PK | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Middle Tenn St | -21.5 | W | 55-0 | OV | 51 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -11.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Idaho | -38 | W | 66-14 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | W | 17-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Arkansas | -13.5 | W | 43-10 | UN | 55.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | W | 29-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Utah State | -26.5 | W | 33-0 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | W | 16-0 | OV | 13.5 | -15.5 | W | 26-0 | UN | 30 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Iowa State | -7.5 | W | 31-17 | OV | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -4.5 | W | 24-3 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hawaii | 10 | 51 | 41 | | 37 | 42 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 0-3 / 1-1 | -3 / -13.5 | -3 / +1.5 |
| Arizona State | 37 | -20.5 | 24(2) | -19 | 23 | 21 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | +13.5 / -28 | -23.5 / +14.5 |
Unfortunately for Arizona State, its petition to join the MEAC and face foes like Morgan State, eviscerated 70-7 by the Sun Devils in opening week, has been rejected. Surely, Kentucky transfer QB Cutter Boley wouldn’t have minded facing a whole succession of teams like the Baltimore-based Bears, against whom he tossed six TD passes last month. In ASU’s three games since, Boley has thrown a combined four TD passes, and after absorbing a 55-19 pasting from a previously-suspect Baylor offense last week, the Sun Devils’ path to six wins and bowl eligibility looks a lot more dicey. Yet with the possible exception of a fading Colorado in early November, this seems the most winnable game left on the slate for Kenny Dillingham’s troops, who look badly in need of a dose of confidence. The Rainbow Warriors might prove what the doctor ordered, as not much has gone right for head coach Timmy Chang is what was supposed to be a potential breakthrough autumn in Honolulu, after the Rainbow Warriors were even garnering some longshot support as a possible Group of 6 candidate for the 12-team playoff in the offseason. Instead, four losses in five, and mainland trips looking like they might be a problem again (as they have often been in the past for Hawaii) after a recent 27-10 shellacking absorbed in far-flung Laramie against a Wyoming side that has otherwise been decidedly punchless this term. “Decidedly punchless” could also apply to the Rainbow Warriors, who except for a very brief eight-minute spell in the fourth quarter of the opener at Stanford (a game Hawaii eventually lost), Chang’s team would be scoring at about a 13 points per game pace. There isn’t much balance, as aside from the occasional draw plays and delays to scatback Devon Rice on passing downs, the Rainbow Warriors can’t run. Their mere 86 yards per game on the ground rank above only lowly Bowling Green and Northern Illinois nationally, and southpaw sophomore pitcher Micah Alejado unable to pick up the slack as his very-reduced stats from a year ago (just four TD passes in five games to date after tossing 24 last season) would indicate. Remember, Hawaii’s last trip to these parts went badly a year ago at nearby Tucson when Arizona rolled up a 40-6 scoreline, and Dillingham has proven a pretty good bully in Tempe the past few years, now 7-3-1 as chalk at what they now call Mountain America Stadium since 2024.
Play Arizona State
| Hawaii | 18.3 / 22 | -3.7 | 37 | 44 | -4 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Arizona State | 21 / 40 | -19 | 22 | 18 | +2 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Hawaii | 10-03 | San Jose . | -2.5 | 51.5 | 16-20 | Arizona State | 10-03 | Baylor | -3 | 49.5 | 19-55 |
| | 09-26 | @ Wyoming | -2 | 44 | 10-27 | | 09-19 | @ Kansas | -5.5 | 50.5 | 24-17 |
| | 09-12 | New Mexic. | -7.5 | 50.5 | 29-19 | | 09-12 | @ Texas A&M | +14.5 | 51.5 | 20-48 |
| Hawaii |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:0-5-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:1-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Stanford | 4.5 | L | 27-37 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10 | 3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 24 |
| 09-05-26 | UNLV | 1.5 | L | 6-21 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | New Mexico State | -7.5 | W | 29-19 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 9-0 | UN | 10 | -4 | W | 19-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Wyoming | -2 | L | 10-27 | UN | 44 | -0.5 | L | 3-3 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-13 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | San Jose State | -2.5 | L | 16-20 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -1.5 | L | 0-14 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-1-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Morgan State | -43.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 28-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas A&M | 14.5 | L | 20-48 | OV | 51.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas | -5.5 | W | 24-17 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | PK | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Baylor | -3 | L | 19-55 | OV | 49.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 13-24 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/08 4:04 am |
| UCLA | 32 | 58 | 17.5 | | 19 | 24 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 2-0 | +16 / +36 | -13.5 / -2.5 |
| Oregon | 36 | -10 | 5.5(3) | -15 | 4 | 12 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 2-0 | +45.5 / +3 | -42 / -14 |
Does Bob Chesney stand a better chance this week than the last time he brought one of his teams into Eugene? That would have been last December in the first round of the playoffs with his James Madison side, which simply couldn’t keep pace with the host Ducks. Though we must note how his Dukes kept swinging until the final gun and would cause quite a reaction at sports books in Nevada and elsewhere by squeezing in the backdoor and covering a near three-TD spread in that 51-34 track meet. Now Chesney (who had already announced his move to Westwood before that playoff game) arrives with his new UCLA side that is generating a buzz in the region for the first time this millennium after a 4-0 start that has the Bruins inside the rankings and the best beginning by a first-year UCLA coach since Red Sanders did the same after he arrived from Vanderbilt in 1949. Some Big Ten insiders, however, are still a tad skeptical despite the four wins and covers, as victims like Cal, San Diego State and Maryland have proven rather disappointing. Still, Chesney’s Bruins are doing things much differently these days, especially with big plays galore on both sides of the line of scrimmage, most recently with five TDs of 39 yards or longer (including the defense as well as the offense) in the 54-3 trashing of Maryland at College Park before last week’s bye. UCLA is also running (282 yards per game ranks 4th nationally) and scoring (44.8 points per game ranks 8th) like it hasn't done since Pepper Rodgers’ last Westwood Wishbone team in 1973, with JMU transfer Wayne Knight part of a three-headed monster at running back and on his way to another 1,000-yard season. Knight has already found the end zone nine times thus far. An opportunistic defense, also filled with portal adds from JMU (like DE Sahir West) and elsewhere (like ex-Oklahoma LB Sammy Omosigho, a big-play machine like another ex-Sooner, NFL Broncos LB Nik Bonitto, and 3rd nationally in solo tackles with 27) is joining the big-play brigade with 12 takeaways, ranking third nationally. The bigger challenge might actually be on the Oregon side this week, though Dan Lanning might not be losing much with former Bruin transfer QB Dante Moore due to sit because of concussion symptoms, as backup Dylan Raiola has plenty of past starting experience at Nebraska and made sure the offense didn’t skip a beat vs. USC two weeks ago when passing for 289 yards and two TDs out of the bullpen in the 41-27 win over the Trojans. The likely bigger concern for Lanning, however, is a stop unit that gave up a combined 1,000 yards to Oklahoma State and USC in a pair of September shootouts, and to this point has taken a step back following the departure of defensive coordinator Tosh Lupoi to Cal. Promoted DB coach Chris Hampton has not figured out how to push all the proper buttons, and we’re expecting to see another high-flying affair in Eugene.
Play the Over
10/07 9:11 PM PDT — Ducks QB Dante Moore has returned to practice, but has been ruled out for this Saturday vs. UCLA due to ongoing concussion symptoms related to his KO at USC on September 26. Backup Dylan Raiola, with two years starting experience at Nebraska, passed for 289 yards and a pair of TDs off the bench in the recent 41-27 win over the Trojans and will get the start at Autzen Stadium vs. the Bruins.
| UCLA | 44.7 / 17 | +27.7 | 19 | 26 | -10 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Oregon | 52 / 22 | +30 | 5 | 31 | -28.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| UCLA | 09-26 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | 55.5 | 54-3 | Oregon | 09-26 | @ USC | -3.5 | 60.5 | 41-27 |
| | 09-19 | Purdue | -13.5 | 53 | 52-38 | | 09-18 | Portland . | -58.5 | 71.5 | 84-0 |
| | 09-12 | San Diego. | -13.5 | 53.5 | 28-10 | | 09-12 | @ Oklahoma . | -24 | 55.5 | 31-39 |
| UCLA |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ California | -2.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 24-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | San Diego State | -13.5 | W | 28-10 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Purdue | -13.5 | W | 52-38 | OV | 53 | -4.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | W | 54-3 | OV | 55.5 | 0 | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oregon |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Boise State | -25.5 | L | 34-27 | OV | 53 | -7 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -14.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Oklahoma State | -24 | L | 31-39 | OV | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | L | 17-24 | OV | 30 |
| 09-18-26 | Portland St | -58.5 | W | 84-0 | OV | 71.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 49-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ USC | -3.5 | W | 41-27 | OV | 60.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-10-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Virginia Tech | 32 | -11 | 18 | -6 | 18 | 18 | 2-1 / 2-0 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 3-0 / 1-1 | +30.3 / +8 | -24.5 / -8.5 |
| California | 18 | 52 | 26(2) | | 25 | 30 | 1-2 / 1-1 | 0-3 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 1-1 | +2.3 / -2.5 | -18 / +2 |
Buyers beware! So the word is floating around the ACC about first-year Cal head coach Tosh Lupoi, who checked most of the boxes for new hires: Former Nick Saban aide, NFL coaching experience, accomplished work as a defensive coordinator at a high-profile program (Oregon), and best of all an alum at the school about to hire him. Lupoi checked all of those boxes, but it appears that he’s missing one big one: Head coaching experience, which Lupoi had none before being tabbed by his alma mater in Berkeley last December. Retaining QB Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele.and keeping him out of the portal seemed a great early move by Lupoi and spoke to his recruiting chops...but that was all before the season began. Lupoi is now especially haunted by his OC hire of Jordan Somerville off of the NFL Bucs staff, a role in which Somerville never worked before, and which wasn't working, forcing Lupoi into a mid-game change last week at UNLV and Somerville's eventual demotion, with passing game coordinator Pat McCann now calling the plays. Thus far, JKS has looked an ACC version of the Chargers’ Justin Herbert with alarming regression, though that’s not been all his fault as the offensive line has been a sieve for an offense that lacked identity for Somerville, though there was a late rally that eventually fell short last week at UNLV behind backup and Colorado State transfer Jackson Brousseau after JKS was KO’d by a hit to the head. JKS is expected back this week (might Lupoi stick with Brousseau instead?), but Cal’s bowl hopes are now dwindling after losses to Clemson and the Rebels as expected program savior JKS (only five TD passes and five picks if tossing away a game vs. outmanned FCS rep Wagner) continues to misfire. Moreover, discipline is haunting the Bears, reflected by the whopping 16 (16!) penalties in Vegas last Saturday. Meanwhile we wonder if James Franklin might be second-guessing his decision to opt for the younger of his former Penn State QBs in the portal (Ethan Grunkemeyer) instead of the one with only one year left of eligibility (Beau Pribula) after Grunkemeyer’s limitations were exposed last Friday by Pitt. Still, it’s a game the Hokies should have won and gone to 5-0, and we’re not sure they really didn’t win as John Love’s errant field goal try on the final play looked like it might have sneaked inside the upright and been good instead of being ruled just wide, costing Va Tech the game. Still, a lot more to like thus far about the Hokies, who would still be unbeaten had they just played a cleaner game vs. the Panthers, and made a 434-191 yardage edge work instead of being undone by a -4 turnover margin and Love’s missed field goal at the end.
Play Virginia Tech
10/06 6:20 PM PDT — Cal QB Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele was a combination of benched + injured in last week's loss at UNLV. Sagapolutele suffered an apparent head injury in the first half, but he was medically cleared to return. Bears' head coach Tosh Lupoi kept second-string Jackson Brousseau in the game for the whole second half, so it remains to be seen if Lupoi was protecting the health of his sophomore QB or if he is interested in seeing a little more from Brousseau in the coming weeks. Lupoi also made a play-caller change midstream last Saturday, and now passing game coordinator Pat McCann (a former OC at Fresno State) has taken overt those duties from the demoted Jordan Somerville.
| Virginia Tech | 29.7 / 25 | +4.7 | 18 | 25 | -6 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| California | 30 / 23.3 | +6.7 | 25 | 35 | -18.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Virginia Tech | 10-02 | Pittsburg. | -1 | 53 | 33-35 | California | 10-03 | @ UNLV | PK | 51.5 | 31-39 |
| | 09-26 | @ Boston Co. | -14.5 | 45.5 | 21-14 | | 09-25 | Clemson | +2.5 | 52 | 10-24 |
| | 09-19 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | 53.5 | 35-26 | | 09-19 | Wagner | -58.5 | 65.5 | 49-7 |
|
| 10-24-25 | California | 34 | 50.5 | 19 | 26/85 | 24/40/0/286 | 2/0 |
| Virginia Tech | 42 | -6 | 24 | 57/377 | 9/18/1/119 | 0/0 |
| Virginia Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | VMI | -54.5 | W | 73-3 | OV | 60.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 45-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Old Dominion | -18 | W | 44-21 | OV | 47.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-3 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | W | 34-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | W | 35-26 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -0.5 | W | 27-14 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Boston College | -14.5 | L | 21-14 | UN | 45.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Pittsburgh U | -1 | L | 33-35 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 24-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| California |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UCLA | 2.5 | L | 24-45 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Syracuse | 4 | W | 21-18 | UN | 57 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-12 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Wagner | -58.5 | L | 49-7 | UN | 65.5 | | W | 29-0 | OV | | | W | 39-7 | OV | |
| 09-25-26 | Clemson | 2.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 52 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ UNLV | 0 | L | 31-39 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 7-24 | OV | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas | 24 | -7.5 | 4 | -8.5 | 4 | 12 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 0-1 | +25.7 / +3 | -20.5 / -5 |
| Oklahoma | 13 | 41 | 12.5(0) | | 10 | 3 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 1-1 | +29.5 / -17.5 | -31.5 / +3 |
Texas has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings by a combined score of 57-9. The Sooners did not find the end zone in either of those two contests. That certainly isn't ideal for an Oklahoma offense that looks lost once again. The Sooners are 1-5 against the spread dating back to the end of last season, scoring ten points against Michigan, 14 points against New Mexico and 13 points against Georgia. Forget completing passes and finding the end zone, QB John Mateer looked like a guy that didn't know how to hold a football in the Sooners' 41-13 loss to the 'Dawgs. Oklahoma fumbled three times and Mateer finished with an interception as he lost most of the trust that he previously gained in Norman. Our power ratings are in line with where this game has opened, so we're not showing much value on either side. Entering the season, Texas was lined as a -6 favorite in this contest. The line has crossed over a touchdown, but when you view the season as a whole, you can make a pretty decent argument that it hasn't moved far enough. If you've been following the newsletter all season, you know that we've been very critical of Arch Manning and the Longhorns' offense. But any criticism that you throw their way has to be doubled in the direction of Oklahoma. Also, the trending arrow of both teams' strength of schedule is going in opposite directions. Per Sagarin, Texas has played the third-toughest schedule in the country thus far and those wins over Texas State, Ohio State, UTSA and Tennessee are looking solid at the moment. Oklahoma's 51-0 win over UTEP isn't holding any value as the Miners are 0-4 straight-up and against the spread vs FBS opposition. Oklahoma's loss to Michigan certainly isn't looking great with the Wolverines losing back-to-back games. The best argument for the Sooners is "Brent Venables will fluster Manning." That's probably true, but Texas won by 17 last year with Manning throwing for 166 yards. When Oklahoma's offense is as bad as it is, Manning just has to manage the game and not give the ball away and the Longhorns should be fine.
Play Texas
| Texas | 24.7 / 15.3 | +9.3 | 4 | 15 | -12.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Oklahoma | 12.3 / 21.3 | -9 | 9 | 15 | -5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Texas | 09-26 | @ Tennessee. | -5 | 54.5 | 20-17 | Oklahoma | 09-26 | @ Georgia | +11 | 44 | 13-41 |
| | 09-19 | Tex San A. | -30 | 58.5 | 30-6 | | 09-19 | New Mexico | -21.5 | 45.5 | 14-6 |
| | 09-12 | Ohio State | -2 | 50.5 | 24-23 | | 09-12 | @ Michigan | -5 | 43.5 | 10-17 |
|
| 10-11-25 | Oklahoma | 6 | 44.5 | 16 | 30/48 | 21/39/3/210 | 1/0 |
| Texas | 23 | -3 | 15 | 35/136 | 21/27/0/166 | 0/0 |
| 10-12-24 | Texas | 34 | -17 | 17 | 30/177 | 21/31/1/229 | 1/0 |
| Oklahoma | 3 | 49 | 18 | 39/89 | 19/30/0/148 | 2/2 |
| Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-2-1 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Texas State | -29.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 61.5 | -7.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -17.5 | W | 28-7 | OV | 33 |
| 09-12-26 | Ohio State | -2 | L | 24-23 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tex San Antonio | -30 | L | 30-6 | UN | 58.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18 | L | 20-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tennessee U | -5 | L | 20-17 | UN | 54.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -3 | W | 10-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oklahoma |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-04-26 | UTEP | -41 | W | 51-0 | UN | 51.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 12.5 | -24 | W | 27-0 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Michigan | -5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 43.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 0-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | New Mexico | -21.5 | L | 14-6 | UN | 45.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -12.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia | 11 | L | 13-41 | OV | 44 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 7 | L | 0-28 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mississippi | 31 | -9.5 | 8 | -8 | 8 | 11 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 | +20 / -24 | -20.5 / +4 |
| Vanderbilt | 24 | 55 | 18(2) | | 18 | 2 | 3-0 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 2-0 | 2-1 / 1-1 | +10.7 / -15 | -17.5 / +18 |
Ole Miss is 5-0 straight-up, 4-1 against the spread over the last five meetings, but these SEC foes haven't taken the field since 2023. The Rebels are coming off their bye week after a chaotic start to the season, which featured a three-point win over Louisville, an emotional victory over LSU and a blow-out loss at Florida. Ole Miss running back Kewan Lacy is expected to return this week. Lacy missed the Week 4 loss to Florida and the Rebels are coming off their bye week, so Lacy has had three weeks to rest his sore shoulder. Head coach Pete Golding expects to ease Lacy back into the rotation this week with a slightly-decreased workload against the Commodores. Vanderbilt is coming off back-to-back losses at Auburn and Georgia, but the 'Dores stayed within the number in both contests. Over the last few seasons, few programs can compete with what Clark Lea has built as an underdog. Since the beginning of the 2024 season, Vanderbilt is 14-3 against the spread as an underdog with eight outright upset victories. Starting QB, freshman Jared Curtis, did not play in last week's loss to Georgia. Blaze Berlowitz hung tough against the Bulldogs, generating 8.3 yards per attempt as the Commodores only trailed by a touchdown at halftime at Sanford Stadium. There's no such thing as an "auto bet" in our eyes, but Vanderbilt as an underdog is getting pretty close. From a 23-year-old Heisman finalist at QB (Diego Pavia) to an 18-year-old true freshman, Lea has simply adapted to every situation thrown his way. No one is better equipped at slowing a game down, playing to strengths, and maximizing opportunities than Vanderbilt right now. It doesn't always show up in the win-loss column, but it certainly shows up in the ATS column.
Play Vanderbilt
10/05 12:27 PM PDT — Ole Miss running back Kewan Lacy is expected to return this week. Lacy missed the Week 4 loss to Florida and the Rebels are coming off their bye week, so Lacy has had three weeks to rest his sore shoulder. Head coach Pete Golding expects to ease Lacy back into the rotation this week with a slightly-decreased workload against the Commodores.
10/05 12:30 PM PDT — Vanderbilt's starting QB, freshman Jared Curtis, did not play in last week's loss to Georgia. Blaze Berlowitz hung tough against the Bulldogs, generating 8.3 yards per attempt as the Commodores only trailed by a touchdown at halftime at Sanford Stadium.
| Mississippi | 33.7 / 28.3 | +5.3 | 8 | 24 | -12.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Vanderbilt | 21.3 / 30 | -8.7 | 18 | 13 | +11 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Mississippi | 09-26 | @ Florida | +4 | 59 | 28-52 | Vanderbilt | 10-03 | @ Georgia | +25.5 | 50 | 14-38 |
| | 09-19 | LSU | +3 | 59 | 32-24 | | 09-26 | @ Auburn | +10 | 54.5 | 15-21 |
| | 09-12 | Charlotte | -44 | 59.5 | 41-9 | | 09-19 | NC State | -3 | 50.5 | 35-31 |
| Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2-1 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Louisville | -6.5 | L | 41-38 | OV | 54.5 | -3 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | -4 | PK | 10-6 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Charlotte | -44 | L | 41-9 | UN | 59.5 | -13.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14.5 | -27.5 | L | 27-0 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | LSU | 3 | W | 32-24 | UN | 59 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | 1.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Florida | 4 | L | 28-52 | OV | 59 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wofford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Vanderbilt |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Austin Peay | -28.5 | L | 28-9 | UN | 57.5 | | L | 5-6 | OV | | | W | 15-9 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Delaware | -20.5 | L | 35-26 | OV | 53.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -11.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | NC State | -3 | W | 35-31 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Auburn | 10 | W | 15-21 | UN | 54.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia | 25.5 | W | 14-38 | OV | 50 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 15.5 | W | 14-21 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tennessee U | 27 | -13.5 | 12 | -11 | 12 | 16 | 3-1 / 1-0 | 2-2 / 1-0 | 0-4 / 1-0 | +21.8 / +21 | -21.5 / -12.5 |
| Arkansas | 19 | 51 | 25(2) | | 23 | 15 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 0-2 | +5.7 / -30 | -7.5 / +13.5 |
Arkansas was on a four-game winning streak in this series before Tennessee earned a 34-31 home win last year. That was one of many heartbreaks that the Razorbacks encountered last season, out-gaining Tennessee with a +7 advantage in first downs but losing the turnover battle 3-0. Tennessee freshman QB Faizon Brandon was benched after generating zero passing yards on his first eight attempts against Auburn. George MacIntyre is expected to get the start this week, as it sounds like Brandon is part-benched and part-injured and probably just needs to catch his breath for a week. MacIntyre went 8-for-10 for 86 yards in relief duty last week, as the Vols didn't really need to pass the ball to get past Auburn. DeSean Bishop finished with 220 yards and three touchdowns on 34 carries. The Hogs are licking their wounds after falling at Texas A&M last week. The under is 4-1 in Tennessee's games this season. The under is 4-1 in Arkansas' games this season. The Vols' last two games have failed to crack the 40-point mark. Are we sure this total should begin with a 5? In games against Utah, Georgia and Texas A&M, Arkansas has scored an average of 11.3 points per game. With Jim Knowles at the helm, Tennessee’s defense has quickly surpassed the Vols’ offense in Knoxville.
Play the Under
| Tennessee U | 27.7 / 14.3 | +13.3 | 12 | 21 | -12 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 |
| Arkansas | 19.3 / 28.3 | -9 | 25 | 17 | +10.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Tennessee U | 10-03 | Auburn | -6 | 54 | 24-14 | Arkansas | 10-03 | @ Texas A&M | +13.5 | 51 | 7-34 |
| | 09-26 | Texas | +5 | 54.5 | 17-20 | | 09-26 | Tulsa | -7 | 51 | 34-6 |
| | 09-19 | Kennesaw . | -35 | 60 | 42-9 | | 09-19 | Georgia | +24.5 | 54.5 | 17-45 |
|
| 10-11-25 | Arkansas | 31 | 68.5 | 29 | 45/240 | 21/31/0/256 | 4/3 |
| Tennessee U | 34 | -10 | 22 | 40/264 | 16/25/0/221 | 0/0 |
| Tennessee U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Furman | -49.5 | L | 56-9 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Georgia Tech | -12.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 55.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13 | -6.5 | W | 24-10 | OV | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Kennesaw State | -35 | L | 42-9 | UN | 60 | -9.5 | W | 15-3 | OV | 14.5 | -21.5 | L | 21-3 | UN | 34 |
| 09-26-26 | Texas | 5 | W | 17-20 | UN | 54.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | L | 3-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Auburn | -6 | W | 24-14 | UN | 54 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Alabama | -40.5 | L | 31-14 | UN | 63.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Utah | 13.5 | L | 10-43 | UN | 55.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | L | 3-29 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia | 24.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | L | 3-21 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Tulsa | -7 | W | 34-6 | UN | 51 | -2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 16-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Texas A&M | 13.5 | L | 7-34 | UN | 51 | 3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 7-24 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tulsa | 31 | 47.5 | 34.5 | | 34 | 34 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 3-0 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 0-2 | +18.3 / -11 | -8.5 / -3 |
| Navy | 24 | -3 | 33(1) | -2.5 | 30 | 34 | 1-0 / 0-3 | 0-1 / 0-3 | 1-0 / 1-2 | +27 / -5.7 | -31.5 / -3 |
Navy has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings, including a 42-23 road win at Tulsa last season. That result was probably a little flattering for the Midshipmen as Tulsa was leading at the two-minute warning at the end of the first half and first downs finished 25-23. We like the Golden Hurricane to get some revenge this week. Tulsa had a couple extra days to prep for this one after playing North Texas last Thursday. After missing the previous two games, QB Baylor Hayes returned to the lineup with three touchdown passes and no interceptions last week against the Mean Green. Navy returns home after three-straight road losses at Florida Atlantic, UAB and Air Force. The Midshipmen are 0-4 against the spread this season, and we haven't seen too many "buy" signals from a team that was projected to be in the American Conference mix. We're never going to question the focus or attention-to-detail from a military academy, but the fact of the matter is Navy hasn't had to travel like this in quite a long time. Yes, the Midshipmen are home this week, but they just played two games in the warm and humid southeast followed by a trek to Colorado Springs. Following Navy's last visit to Air Force in 2024, Navy had a bye the week after to recover. That's not the case this year. After the first month of the season, the Midshipmen have probably come close to matching their entire travel output from last season where the longest trip was to Dallas. Tulsa's Tre Lamb has proven to be a very solid coach, and now that he's beginning to see the service academies a couple times, his notebook will expand. The Golden Hurricane beat Army as a 9.5-point 'dog at the end of last season, and we certainly wouldn't be shocked if they pulled another upset in this one.
Play Tulsa
| Tulsa | 30.7 / 26.3 | +4.3 | 34 | 38 | -10.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Navy | 19.7 / 25.3 | -5.7 | 30 | 38 | -3 | 0-0 / 0-3 | 0-0 / 0-3 | 0-0 / 1-2 |
| Tulsa | 10-01 | North Tex. | +3 | 57 | 44-45 | Navy | 10-03 | @ Air Force | +2.5 | 45.5 | 9-14 |
| | 09-26 | @ Arkansas | +7 | 51 | 6-34 | | 09-25 | @ UAB | -6.5 | 50 | 20-24 |
| | 09-19 | Texas A&M. | -41 | 56.5 | 42-0 | | 09-12 | @ Florida A. | -4.5 | 59.5 | 30-38 |
|
| 09-13-25 | Navy | 42 | -14 | 25 | 61/371 | 6/10/2/94 | 3/1 |
| Tulsa | 23 | 52.5 | 23 | 33/140 | 22/37/1/189 | 1/1 |
| Tulsa |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:0-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Oklahoma State | 12.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 57.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 7 | W | 10-3 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Sam Houston St | -12.5 | L | 23-17 | UN | 51.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | L | 10-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Texas A&M-Commerce | -41 | W | 42-0 | UN | 56.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Arkansas | 7 | L | 6-34 | UN | 51 | 2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | L | 0-16 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-01-26 | North Texas | 3 | W | 44-45 | OV | 57 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Navy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Towson | -31.5 | L | 42-15 | OV | 50.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-12 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | -4.5 | L | 30-38 | OV | 59.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | -3 | L | 7-31 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ UAB | -6.5 | L | 20-24 | UN | 50 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 13-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Air Force | 2.5 | L | 9-14 | UN | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia | 27 | 52 | 2 | | 3 | 18 | 4-0 / 1-0 | 3-1 / 1-0 | 4-0 / 1-0 | +40.5 / +28 | -31.5 / -24.5 |
| Alabama | 23 | -2.5 | 5(3) | PK | 6 | 14 | 3-0 / 2-0 | 2-1 / 2-0 | 3-0 / 2-0 | +27.7 / +30.5 | -19 / -7.5 |
ANALYSIS UPDATED ON THURSDAY MORNING: It appears that the tropical storm swirling through the Gulf has picked up some speed and forecasts are now calling for it to clear Tuscaloosa hours before kickoff. Windy conditions are still to be expected, but SEC officials confirmed that they are planning to play this game as-scheduled on Saturday. With that in mind, we are looking in Georgia's direction. The Bulldogs' offense is generating 6.5 yards per carry this season, and a big reason for that is QB Gunner Stockton. After averaging 3.6 yards per carry last season, Stockton has found his legs this year with 6.1 yards per carry. And you can't pin that on Georgia's less-than-stellar schedule, because Stockton only ran the ball one time against Tennessee State and Western Kentucky. So this uptick in mobility came against SEC defenses, and although Alabama's defense has been impressive during stretches this season, the young Crimson Tide have also struggled struggled with some growing pains. Sophomore QB Keelon Russell is completing 71.2-percent of his passes and the Tide have one of the best passing attacks in the country. If winds are swirling and balls are wet, we have more trust in Georgia being able to run a consistent offense on the ground over an Alabama attack that likely needs to throw the ball to have some success.
Play Georgia
10/06 4:53 PM PDT — What first seemed a far-fetched rumor appears to be quickly picking up steam. Because of the tropical storm (potential hurricane) building in the Gulf that is forecasted to make landfall on Saturday morning, there are real talks about moving this game to a safer location. We will post updates as they become available from the SEC.
| Georgia | 41.3 / 14.7 | +26.7 | 3 | 18 | -20.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Alabama | 51.7 / 25.7 | +26 | 7 | 17 | -11.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Georgia | 10-03 | Vanderbilt | -25.5 | 50 | 38-14 | Alabama | 10-03 | @ Mississip. | -5.5 | 63 | 56-23 |
| | 09-26 | Oklahoma | -11 | 44 | 41-13 | | 09-26 | South Car. | -11.5 | 53 | 49-18 |
| | 09-19 | @ Arkansas | -24.5 | 54.5 | 45-17 | | 09-19 | Florida S. | -18 | 50.5 | 50-36 |
|
| 12-06-25 | Georgia | 28 | -1.5 | 16 | 41/141 | 20/26/0/156 | 0/0 |
| Alabama | 7 | 48.5 | 11 | 16/-3 | 19/39/1/212 | 1/0 |
| 09-27-25 | Alabama | 24 | 53.5 | 25 | 36/119 | 25/39/0/280 | 0/0 |
| Georgia | 21 | -2.5 | 17 | 33/227 | 13/20/0/130 | 1/1 |
| Georgia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-0 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:5-0-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tennessee St | -49.5 | W | 63-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Western Kentucky | -40.5 | W | 70-20 | OV | 55.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -24.5 | W | 49-6 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arkansas | -24.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | W | 21-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma | -11 | W | 41-13 | OV | 44 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7 | W | 28-0 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Vanderbilt | -25.5 | L | 38-14 | OV | 50 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -15.5 | L | 21-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-0 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:5-0-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:5-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | East Carolina | -28 | W | 48-10 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -16.5 | W | 38-7 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kentucky | -9 | W | 45-17 | OV | 47.5 | -3 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -5.5 | L | 13-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida State | -18 | L | 50-36 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 26-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Carolina | -11.5 | W | 49-18 | OV | 53 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -7 | W | 35-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Mississippi St | -5.5 | W | 56-23 | OV | 63 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 28-17 | OV | 31.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Chattanooga | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Charlotte | 14 | 58 | 52 | | 51 | 27 | 0-3 / 0-2 | 0-3 / 2-0 | 2-1 / 0-2 | -26.7 / -18.5 | +2.5 / +30.5 |
| North Texas | 42 | -27.5 | 34(2) | -20 | 36 | 35 | 2-0 / 1-2 | 2-0 / 1-2 | 1-1 / 3-0 | +43.5 / -16.3 | -18 / +13.5 |
North Texas won-and-covered last year's contest in Charlotte as a 25.5-point road favorite. The Mean Green produced 754 total yards on offense, with 608 of them coming through the air. Three different North Texas receivers cleared the 100-yards mark. Most of the players from that Mean Green side have left for Oklahoma State, but that doesn't make Charlotte's defense feel any better. The 49ers are coming off a 59-8 home loss to Memphis last week and Charlotte has now been out-scored by a combined margin of 203-86 through the first five weeks. Shockingly, even with those numbers, Charlotte has covered the spread in each of its last six road games dating back to the end of last season. North Texas has a couple much-needed extra days to prep for this one after going to overtime against Tulsa last Thursday. The Green Wave have a bye after this game, so first-year head coach Neal Brown may have his hands full with keeping North Texas focused on the 49ers and not on the Denton-area golf courses. From a power ratings' perspective, this is a really high number in favor of the Mean Green that we're struggling to justify. But with that said, we simply have no interest in backing Charlotte. Any potential interest in Charlotte would need to come in the first half, hoping to catch North Texas in a brief moment of sleepiness. Against App State, Charlotte only trailed 13-7 at halftime. Against Louisiana, Charlotte trailed 10-7 at halftime. Look for the 49ers to throw their best punch early, but we can't trust Charlotte over the course of 60 minutes.
| Charlotte | 12 / 39.7 | -27.7 | 52 | 34 | +14.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| North Texas | 47.7 / 35.7 | +12 | 34 | 41 | -13 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Charlotte | 10-03 | Memphis | +18.5 | 52 | 8-59 | North Texas | 10-01 | @ Tulsa | -3 | 57 | 45-44 |
| | 09-26 | Louisiana | +9 | 49 | 7-34 | | 09-26 | Houston B. | -39 | 60 | 63-14 |
| | 09-19 | @ Appalachi. | +16.5 | 52.5 | 21-26 | | 09-19 | @ Texas Sta. | +3 | 62.5 | 35-49 |
|
| 10-24-25 | North Texas | 54 | -25.5 | 32 | 29/146 | 37/49/1/608 | 2/1 |
| Charlotte | 20 | 60 | 13 | 27/104 | 20/36/0/295 | 0/0 |
| Charlotte |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-5 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:0-4 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:0-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Citadel | -20.5 | L | 41-43 | OV | 49 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Mississippi | 44 | W | 9-41 | UN | 59.5 | 13.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14.5 | 27.5 | W | 0-27 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Appalachian St | 16.5 | W | 21-26 | UN | 52.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-13 | UN | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Louisiana | 9 | L | 7-34 | UN | 49 | 2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 5.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Memphis | 18.5 | L | 8-59 | OV | 52 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-1-2 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Indiana | 40 | W | 16-52 | OV | 57.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-14 | P | 14 | 24 | W | 6-24 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | UNLV | 3 | W | 44-6 | UN | 58.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-0 | P | 13 | 1.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas State | 3 | L | 35-49 | OV | 62.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 13.5 | 2 | W | 28-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Houston Baptist | -39 | W | 63-14 | OV | 60 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 35-14 | OV | |
| 10-01-26 | @ Tulsa | -3 | L | 45-44 | OV | 57 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Houston U | 21 | 55 | 17 | | 18 | 27 | 3-0 / 1-1 | 1-1-1 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 2-0 | +31.3 / +6 | -27.5 / -4.5 |
| Kansas State | 30 | -2.5 | 17.5(2) | -1.5 | 17 | 27 | 3-0 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 1-0 | +35.3 / -5 | -26.5 / -6 |
We’ve been underwhelmed by much of the Big XII thus far, Houston among those, as the Cougs have looked irresistible this season only against FCS foe Southern U. Certainly not last week vs. UCF, which had the Cougars on the ropes until well into the third quarter when Scott Frost temporarily ran low on QBs and was forced to use third-stringer Kaleb Annett - who couldn’t get the ball downfield - after starter Keyone Jenkins was temporarily KO’d following his disastrous interception deep in his own territory got Houston back into the game. It’s going to take a better effort than last week or the previous Saturday at Georgia Southern (both spread losses for the Cougars) to deal with a more-dangerous K-State squad that has had a week to lick its wounds after blowing a second-half lead at Cincinnati. Now it’s back to the Little Apple, where new head coach Collin Klein won all three for the ‘Cats in September, and where veteran dual-threat QB Avery Johnson (better than 300 yards per game total offense thus far) is more likely to fly, or perhaps run, which he did to the tune of 152 rushing yards the last time KSU played at Manhattan on September 19 vs. Tulane. The Willie Fritz defense must also now deal with a foe that will seriously opt for the overland route as the Cats’ smashmouth infantry is gaining better than 6.4 yards per carry while ranking 13th nationally at 241 yards per game, and probably do it better than a somewhat-disappointing Texas Tech a couple of weeks ago in Lubbock. Let’s also see if Houston can stand up a bit better against another quality QB after facing only one of those (Oregon State’s Braden Atkinson, in his first start, tossing for 376 yards) and another pair of so-so pilots (Georgia Southern’s ageless Max Johnson and Texas Tech’s rather limited Will Hammond) who burned the Cougs for over 550 combined pass yards in recent weeks.
Play Kansas State
| Houston U | 31.7 / 24.3 | +7.3 | 17 | 25 | -6.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Kansas State | 30.3 / 19.3 | +11 | 17 | 31 | -14.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Houston U | 10-03 | Central F. | -10 | 50 | 27-17 | Kansas State | 09-26 | @ Cincinnat. | -6 | 55 | 26-31 |
| | 09-26 | @ Georgia S. | -17 | 56.5 | 42-28 | | 09-19 | Tulane | -20.5 | 50 | 31-20 |
| | 09-18 | @ Texas Tech | +8 | 52.5 | 26-28 | | 09-12 | Washingto. | -17.5 | 48.5 | 34-7 |
|
| 11-02-24 | Kansas State | 19 | -12.5 | 21 | 33/99 | 23/39/2/238 | 3/0 |
| Houston U | 24 | 45.5 | 10 | 39/123 | 12/12/0/111 | 1/1 |
| Houston U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-2-1 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Oregon State | -21 | L | 33-20 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 9-7 | OV | 10.5 | -12.5 | L | 19-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern | -52 | W | 77-6 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 49-0 | OV | |
| 09-18-26 | @ Texas Tech | 8 | W | 26-28 | OV | 52.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 17-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia Southern | -17 | L | 42-28 | OV | 56.5 | -4.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -10 | W | 28-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Central Florida | -10 | PK | 27-17 | UN | 50 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:1-1-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Nicholls State | -41.5 | W | 71-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 22-0 | OV | | | W | 36-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Washington State | -17.5 | W | 34-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10 | -10 | PK | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tulane | -20.5 | L | 31-20 | OV | 50 | -5.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Cincinnati U | -6 | L | 26-31 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Stanford | 6 | 55 | 31 | | 31 | 21 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 3-0 / 1-1 | -7.3 / -41 | +7.5 / +12.5 |
| Notre Dame | 48 | -40.5 | 2.5(3) | -31.5 | 3 | 23 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 2-0 | +34.5 / +25 | -37 / -24 |
Word is that some Stanford-connected “techies” in Silicon Valley have proposed that instead of the Cardinal sending its team to South Bend to get humiliated that perhaps this might be a more-fair contest if simply letting Chat GPT decide the whole affair, and at least spare Tavita Pritchard’s squad some inevitable bumps and bruises. Or maybe twisting the arm of the TV execs just a bit to leave this potential carnage on Peacock instead of on big NBC. Though any trepidation from the Palo Alto contingent is understandable after already losing at home by 39 to Miami, and on the road by 28 at Duke and 54 at Wake Forest, making one shudder to think what the Domers might do to the Tree. Marcus Freeman sounded a bit bothered that the Irish didn’t extend the margin a bit (a lot?) further in Chapel Hill last week. Perhaps sparing the Cardinal some added humiliation is the fact that this Notre Dame version hasn’t quite flashed the extra gear of a year ago when NFL first-round picks Jeremiyah Love and Jadarian Price were running the ball with abandon and the Irish were gaining better than 200 yards per game on the ground. The Domers are well off of that pace this season, ranking just 65th nationally when running the ball. Yet, after being held to single-digit scoring in its three losses, even on a good afternoon, Stanford would appear unable to make this one even mildly interesting, with a 135th-ranked infantry providing no diversion for transfer QB Davis Warren, who never had to worry about being under this sort of siege in his days at Michigan. In the end, the eventual margin probably depends upon how sharp of an effort Freeman wants from his troops in a dress rehearsal for the first real serious challenge of the season next week at BYU.
| Stanford | 14.7 / 39.7 | -25 | 31 | 21 | +9 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Notre Dame | 37.7 / 15.3 | +22.3 | 3 | 24 | -25.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Stanford | 10-03 | @ Wake Fore. | +14.5 | 54 | 3-57 | Notre Dame | 10-03 | @ North Car. | -21 | 46.5 | 37-26 |
| | 09-26 | Georgia T. | +3 | 48 | 34-27 | | 09-26 | @ Purdue | -27 | 57 | 49-10 |
| | 09-19 | @ Duke | +10 | 51.5 | 7-35 | | 09-19 | Michigan . | -29 | 51.5 | 27-10 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Notre Dame | 49 | -32.5 | 24 | 38/187 | 23/36/0/337 | 2/0 |
| Stanford | 20 | 49.5 | 16 | 30/86 | 20/40/1/226 | 0/0 |
| 10-12-24 | Stanford | 7 | 45.5 | 14 | 41/113 | 10/18/0/87 | 3/1 |
| Notre Dame | 49 | -23 | 24 | 39/229 | 18/27/0/248 | 1/1 |
| Stanford |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Hawaii | -4.5 | W | 37-27 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10 | -3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24 |
| 09-04-26 | Miami Florida | 24.5 | L | 6-45 | OV | 46.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | 14 | L | 6-28 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Duke | 10 | L | 7-35 | UN | 51.5 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Georgia Tech | 3 | W | 34-27 | OV | 48 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-20 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | 14.5 | L | 3-57 | OV | 54 | 3.5 | L | 0-15 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 3-29 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Elon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Notre Dame |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-0 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:5-0 , PSR:5-0 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-0 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Wisconsin | -21.5 | W | 41-13 | OV | 46 | -6.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Rice | -44.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 54.5 | -13.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -26.5 | W | 42-0 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Michigan State | -29 | L | 27-10 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -17.5 | L | 17-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Purdue | -27 | W | 49-10 | OV | 57 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -16.5 | W | 35-0 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Carolina | -21 | L | 37-26 | OV | 46.5 | -5.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -11 | L | 21-14 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tech Play | | Updated: 10/06 8:08 pm |
| San Diego State | 19 | 52.5 | 38 | | 32 | 31 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 1-1 | +7.3 / -21.5 | -10.5 / +8 |
| Oregon State | 43 | -14.5 | 30(2) | -10 | 33 | 36 | 1-1 / 2-1 | 2-0 / 3-0 | 2-0 / 2-1 | +12 / +14.3 | +4.5 / +1 |
For anyone who looked at the 31-29 scoreline over Texas State on Saturday night and might be thinking there has been an Air Coryell sighting at San Diego State, we suggest pumping the brakes more than a bit. That’s because the Aztecs helped themselves with both a kickoff return and pick-six to stave off the Bobcats, plus having to travel a total of 17 yards for their other two TDs after sloppy giveaways by GJ Kinne’s generous crew, which couldn't take advantage of a reported mumps outbreak on the host side. Mumps or no mumps, the evidence remains overwhelming that the modern “Air Aztec” is still very much on the tarmac as QB Jayden Denegal still can’t get the offense airborne (indeed, only 109 passing yards on 23 pass attempts last Saturday, all of 4.7 yards per pass), and with the status of top threat RB Lucky Sutton (who didn’t play vs. the Bobcats due to a bad ankle) very iffy, offensive fireworks remain just a rumor on Montezuma Mesa. More discerning SDSU backers are also starting to openly question head coach Sean Lewis, whose hire in 2024 was supposed to reignite the attack, only for Aztec supporters to now begin understanding why Deion Sanders demoted Lewis from play-calling duties at Colorado in 2023. No such issues at swashbuckling Oregon State, as first-year head coach JaMarcus Shephard has the Beavers scorching the field like they haven’t done since the Dennis Erickson era, and gunslinger Mercer transfer QB Braden Atkinson almost pulling the gridiron equivalent of Catfish Hunter’s perfect game against the Twins in May of ‘68 when hitting on 30-of-33 passes for 427 yards and five TDs last week at Colorado State, a performance so emasculating for the Rams that Jim Mora demoted his defensive coordinator Tyson Summers before the first half was complete, then fired him after the game. Atkinson, by the way, now leads the nation in passing at a whopping 1,848 yards, plus 16 TDs in just five games. And with freshman WR Jesse Legree (already nine TDs and a Paul Warfield-like 26.5 yards per catch!) continuing to run wild in opposing secondaries, it’s no wonder the Beavs are 5-0 vs. the line and the new buzz team on the Pacific Coast.
Play Oregon State
10/06 8:08 AM PDT — Top Aztecs RB Lucky Sutton, who gained 1,297 yards last season, missed last Saturday's game vs. Texas State with an ankle injury suffered early in the previous week's loss at Toledo. Josiah Lucas assumed featured RB duties vs. the Bobcats and rushed for 111 yards, but the Aztecs could only muster 239 yards of offense as they were helped by defensive and special teams TDs in the 31-29 win. Sutton remains SDSU's best offensive threat, and monitor his status before this game in Corvallis.
| San Diego State | 20 / 32 | -12 | 30 | 31 | +3 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Oregon State | 47 / 16.7 | +30.3 | 33 | 46 | -12 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| San Diego State | 10-03 | Texas Sta. | +10 | 57.5 | 31-29 | Oregon State | 10-03 | @ Colorado . | -7 | 61 | 56-26 |
| | 09-26 | @ Toledo | +2.5 | 50.5 | 16-41 | | 09-26 | @ UTEP | -11 | 56 | 33-7 |
| | 09-19 | James Mad. | -3 | 46.5 | 13-26 | | 09-19 | Montana | -17.5 | 56.5 | 52-17 |
| San Diego State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:0-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Portland St | -38.5 | L | 53-20 | OV | 61 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | W | 29-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ UCLA | 13.5 | L | 10-28 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | James Madison | -3 | L | 13-26 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 0-19 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Toledo | 2.5 | L | 16-41 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Texas State | 10 | W | 31-29 | OV | 57.5 | 2.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 13.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 29 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oregon State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:5-0 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Houston U | 21 | W | 20-33 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-9 | OV | 10.5 | 12.5 | W | 7-19 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Texas Tech | 26 | W | 24-35 | OV | 52.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 14.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Montana | -17.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ UTEP | -11 | W | 33-7 | UN | 56 | -2.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -6.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Colorado State | -7 | W | 56-26 | OV | 61 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -4 | W | 35-14 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-10-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Dakota State | 24 | -3 | 27 | -2 | 28 | 43 | 3-0 / 2-0 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 0-3 / 1-1 | +30.7 / +13.5 | -21.5 / -13.5 |
| UNLV | 29 | 48 | 30(1) | | 28 | 26 | 1-1 / 2-1 | 1-1 / 2-1 | 1-1 / 0-3 | +1 / +1.7 | -2.5 / -6 |
We’re about to find out a lot more about North Dakota State and the suddenly very-real possibility that the Bison could do a Vegas Golden Knights and crash the Stanley Cup finals, er, the 12-team playoff, in their first year of eligibility thanks to a summertime court ruling that removed the waiting period for transitioning FCS sides to participate in the postseason as soon as they move to the FBS level. While not to begrudge NDSU for its considerable past accomplishments or its current 5-0 SU mark, we still need a bit more convincing about 2026, however, and the move into the Mountain West. The Bison look equipped to win the league, but the only significant win to date, and to which degree that can even be argued, came against a modest Air Force side in mid-September. Wins against substandard Jacksonville State, Fordham, Sacramento State and Wyoming do not bolster the NDSU case, which will get more substantial if the Bison can beat UNLV and then New Mexico in two weeks in Albuquerque. We’re hardly sure of wins against either, or the supposed power of the currently third-ranked defense (allowing just 236 yards per game) in the FBS that has been helped by that very favorable early slate which has also helped mask an efficient but certainly not-dynamic offense. Meanwhile, the Rebels have been playing and occasionally beating Power 4 opposition (like Cal last week) in recent years, faced American contender North Texas and also fought Group of 6 heavyweight Memphis to a close split decision at Allegiant Stadium in Week Zero. More important to the immediate cause off the Strip, much-maligned ex-Oklahoma and Auburn QB Jackson Arnold is finally starting to click, with three TD passes each of the past two weeks vs. Akron and the Golden Bears, while also bolting for 110 rushing yards out of the pocket when UNLV put 39 points on Cal last Saturday in Vegas. Conclusion? Before we anoint NDSU as the team to beat in the Mountain West, let’s first see how the Bison deal with a legitimate FBS-level offense. Keep in mind that Dan Mullen’s team might have already played as good or better than the Bison, and we’re pretty sure NDSU hasn’t yet beaten a team of UNLV”s caliber, either.
Play UNLV
| North Dakota State | 32.3 / 14 | +18.3 | 28 | 43 | -14.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| UNLV | 27.7 / 28.3 | -0.7 | 28 | 38 | -5.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| North Dakota State | 10-03 | Wyoming | -17 | 44 | 28-0 | UNLV | 10-03 | California | PK | 51.5 | 39-31 |
| | 09-19 | @ Sacrament. | -24.5 | 50.5 | 31-10 | | 09-26 | @ Akron | -13 | 53 | 38-10 |
| | 09-12 | @ Air Force | -2 | 48.5 | 38-32 | | 09-12 | @ North Tex. | -3 | 58.5 | 6-44 |
| North Dakota State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-0 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Jacksonville St | -6.5 | W | 33-7 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -3.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Fordham | -41.5 | L | 38-0 | UN | 54 | | W | 3-0 | OV | | | W | 17-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Air Force | -2 | W | 38-32 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 28-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Sacramento State | -24.5 | L | 31-10 | UN | 50.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 10.5 | -14.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Wyoming | -17 | W | 28-0 | UN | 44 | -4.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -10 | W | 17-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UNLV |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-2-1 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Memphis | -4.5 | L | 21-27 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13 | -3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Hawaii | -1.5 | W | 21-6 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ North Texas | -3 | L | 6-44 | UN | 58.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-13 | P | 13 | -1.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Akron | -13 | W | 38-10 | UN | 53 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7 | L | 14-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | California | 0 | W | 39-31 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 24-7 | OV | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Air Force | 25 | -6.5 | 38 | -10 | 35 | 31 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 1-0 | +11 / +3 | -10.5 / -4.5 |
| No Illinois | 14 | 48.5 | 50(2) | | 48 | 47 | 0-1 / 0-3 | 0-1 / 1-2 | 1-0 / 1-2 | -4 / -28.7 | +2.5 / +24.5 |
It’s not the sort of news that Air Force head coach Troy Calhoun wanted to hear, but QB Liam Szarka’s notable bravado has resulted in a season-ending leg injury suffered last week in the win over Navy, the second time in two seasons that the fearless Szarka (who accounted for better than 2,200 yards a year ago) has gone down for the count. There is some experience at the position, as senior Josh Johnson started four games last season, and backup Evan Medders has looked serviceable in a few relief appearances this campaign, but similar dynamism is lacking. If there’s a break for Calhoun, it’s that the Falcons begin their non-Szarka portion of the campaign against a woeful Northern Illinois side that might be wondering if it should just have skipped this season altogether. After all, the program was left in a bit of limbo in February when former head coach Thomas Hammock bolted DeKalb for a job as RB coach with the Super Bowl champion Seahawks (good career move, we’d say), with the Huskies deciding to simply go thru the season with defensive coordinator Rob Harley on an interim head coaching tag before deciding on any full-time appointment. Though Harley isn’t doing much for his potential candidacy in an 0-4 start that has some wondering if the Huskies or Charlotte or Sacramento State might be the worst FBS team in the land. Perhaps, then, it’s a good thing that NIU is spending this season mostly flying under the national radar anyway after its quiet offseason move to the Mountain West didn’t even rate a mention on ESPN’s SportsCenter (do Paul Finebaum and any number of other talking heads even know?). Among the NIU embarrassments to date is a home loss to FCS Illinois State (not a bad FCS entry, but still...) and a thumping loss at Georgia State in front of last week’s bye. So far, Western Carolina transfer QB Taron Dickens hasn’t solved what was also a major problem–-a competent on-field pilot--for Hammock’s last team a year ago, tossing only three TD passes in four games, and no help appears forthcoming from a ground game that ranks dead last nationally at just 79 yards per game and gaining only a puny 2.6 yards per pop. Providing the one bankable edge in DeKalb is Steve Russ’s veteran Air Force stop unit allowing only 286 yards per game (ranks 24th) against better opposition than the Huskies. So, if you don’t mind three or so hours of likely torturous watching on the CBS Sports Network, the Falcons could provide a bit of satisfaction and value here.
Play Air Force
10/05 4:50 PM PDT — Air Force QB Liam Szarka has been ruled out for the season with a leg injury.
| Air Force | 27.3 / 26.7 | +0.7 | 33 | 34 | -1.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| No Illinois | 18.3 / 35 | -16.7 | 48 | 40 | +15 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Air Force | 10-03 | Navy | -2.5 | 45.5 | 14-9 | No Illinois | 09-26 | @ Georgia S. | +8.5 | 56.5 | 14-35 |
| | 09-26 | @ Nevada | -4.5 | 50.5 | 36-33 | | 09-19 | @ Arizona U | +34.5 | 50 | 17-42 |
| | 09-12 | North Dak. | +2 | 48.5 | 32-38 | | 09-12 | Illinois . | +2.5 | 48 | 24-28 |
| Air Force |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Duquesne | -31.5 | W | 34-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 20-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | North Dakota State | 2 | L | 32-38 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 13-28 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Nevada | -4.5 | L | 36-33 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Navy | -2.5 | W | 14-9 | UN | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| No Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-4 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:0-4 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Iowa | 31 | L | 0-40 | UN | 44.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-20 | OV | 10 | 18.5 | L | 0-33 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Illinois State | 2.5 | L | 24-28 | OV | 48 | | L | 0-14 | OV | | | L | 17-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arizona U | 34.5 | W | 17-42 | OV | 50 | 7.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 10-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia State | 8.5 | L | 14-35 | UN | 56.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Boise State | 22 | -9 | 20 | -5 | 20 | 40 | 3-0 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 2-0 | 3-0 / 1-1 | +17 / +9 | -19 / +9 |
| Fresno State | 20 | 48.5 | 27(2) | | 28 | 35 | 2-0 / 2-1 | 2-0 / 2-1 | 2-0 / 0-3 | +30 / -1 | -15 / +7 |
We suppose Boise State is going to be in revenge mode after the extenuating circumstances surrounding last year’s loss to Fresno on the blue carpet, when Spencer Danielson didn’t have a Tyson Bagent or Case Keenum-like backup QB in the bullpen. In fact, he didn’t have an adequate backup at all which was exposed ruthlessly last November 1 by the Bulldogs, who knocked Broncos starter Maddux Madsen out of the game early and then teed off on unprepared backup Max Cutforth, who could barely get Danielson's offense out of a lurch in what turned out to be a 30-7 Boise loss. Now, Madsen is back at 100-percent and enjoying a mostly-pristine start to his senior year, on 11 TD passes and zero picks as we near the half-mile pole of the regular season. The Broncos are trying to replicate their 2024 effort, when making the 12-team playoff out of the Mountain West after losing a close opener at Oregon (as the case again this season vs. the Ducks). Fresno, however, appears to have worked out the bugs since a numbing 39-0 loss at USC proved a depressing curtain-raiser. That night, however, was the first college start for QB Jayden Mandal, who was understandably shaky vs. the Trojans but has looked increasingly comfy since as the Bulldogs have rolled off four wins and covers in a row, with a rock-ribbed, veteran defense allowing under 11 points per game in the win streak. A sign of Mandal’s progress is that he hasn’t tossed a pick in four games since the opener vs. USC, and was a coolly-efficient 24-of-33 through the air last Saturday in Pullman as Fresno gradually pulled clear of Washington State. Now, Matt Entz would like to be at full-strength for this new Pac-12 showdown, and that means top rusher RB Rayshon Luke (6.8 yards per carry). Luke exited last Saturday night at the Palouse with a concussion, though Entz was quietly confident early in the week that Luke would be able to make the post on the weekend...stay tuned. As long as he does and Fresno is at or near full-strength, this one likely stays tight, and worth noting that Boise isn’t covering the spreads every week, pushed hard by FCS South Dakota a couple of weeks ago on the blue carpet and allowing Utah State to hang around just enough last week to slip inside of a near 3-TD impost.
Play the Under
10/05 9:56 PM PDT — Fresno State running back Rayshon Luke (286 rushing yards with two TDs this season) needs to clear concussion protocol this week after getting knocked out of last week's game against Washington State.
| Boise State | 35.7 / 16.3 | +19.3 | 20 | 43 | -18.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Fresno State | 30 / 13.3 | +16.7 | 29 | 41 | -4.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Boise State | 10-03 | Utah State | -19.5 | 51 | 37-18 | Fresno State | 10-03 | @ Washingto. | +2 | 45 | 26-6 |
| | 09-26 | @ Western M. | -8 | 50.5 | 32-7 | | 09-26 | Rice | -12 | 43 | 38-24 |
| | 09-19 | South Dak. | -28.5 | 61.5 | 38-24 | | 09-19 | @ San Jose . | -4 | 47.5 | 26-10 |
|
| 11-01-25 | Fresno State | 30 | 47.5 | 15 | 47/189 | 10/21/0/35 | 0/0 |
| Boise State | 7 | -17.5 | 11 | 29/91 | 15/33/2/102 | 2/1 |
| Boise State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Oregon | 25.5 | W | 27-34 | OV | 53 | 7 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 14.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Memphis | -9.5 | W | 38-20 | OV | 55 | -3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -6 | L | 17-20 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | South Dakota | -28.5 | L | 38-24 | OV | 61.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-14 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Western Michigan | -8 | W | 32-7 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 8-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4.5 | W | 15-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Utah State | -19.5 | L | 37-18 | OV | 51 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -11 | W | 28-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Fresno State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3-1 , O/U:0-5-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2-1 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ USC | 22.5 | L | 0-39 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | PK | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-30 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Sacramento State | -17.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -10.5 | W | 32-0 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Jose State | -4 | W | 26-10 | UN | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | PK | 6-3 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | Rice | -12 | W | 38-24 | OV | 43 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Washington State | 2 | W | 26-6 | UN | 45 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 6-6 | UN | 22.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| KEY |
| Score | The predicted score for an event |
| PR | The team's Power Rating |
| GS Line | The GoldSheet line, calculated using each team's Power Rating. |
| Avg. PR | The average Power Rating of a team over the course of the season. |
| Avg. OPR | The average of a team's opponent Power Rating on the day that they played. |
| SUR (H/A) | The team's straight-up-record, both at home and on the road. |
| ATS (H/A) | The team's record against-the-spread. |
| O/U (H/A) | The team's over-under record. |
| Pts. Diff. (H/A) | The team's +/- point differential. |
| Avg. Ln. (H/A) | The average line the team has had over the course of the season. |
| PF/PA | The average points a team has scored and allowed. |
| FD | The total number of first downs. |
| RA/RY | The number of rushing attempts and yards. |
| PC/PA/I/PY | The number of passing completions, attempts, interceptions and yards. |
| RA/RY | The number of fumbles and fumbles lost. |
COPYRIGHT 2026 © THE GOLD SHEET
ALL RIGHT RESERVED.