October 1st
| Western Kentucky | 29 | 56 | 44 | | 41 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-3 | 1-0 / 1-2 | 1-0 / 2-1 | +45 / -41 | -40 / +28.5 |
| New Mexico State | 24 | -2 | 45(2) | -1 | 46 | 28 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 0-2 | +6.5 / -13.5 | -9 / +19.5 |
Back properly among the welterweights after suffering a couple of painful beatdowns at top five-ranked heavyweights Georgia and Indiana in September, Tyson Helton’s Hilltoppers can get back to business in Conference USA and take aim at their normal minor bowl berth. It was a big drop from the Hoosiers down to the FCS Mercyhurst Lakers last week, but Western Kentucky did regain a bit of swagger with its 52 points and near 600-yard onslaught. QB Rodney Tisdale in particular appreciated more favorable opposition while passing for over 300 yards and three TDs. Granted, New Mexico State represents a step up from Mercyhurst, but the Aggies are also a far cry from Georgia and Indiana, and the skittery Tisdale might continue his recent feel-good against the same Tony Sanchez defense he burned for 301 passing yards and four TDs in a 35-16 Hilltopper romp last November 1 in Bowling Green. In fact, Helton has beaten Sanchez like a drum the past two seasons with WKU winning each matchup by comfy double-digit margins. Further, not to compare results vs. Mercyhurst, but Sanchez and his Aggies had a lot more trouble vs. the NEC Lakers in September, trailing late in the first half before a late three-TD flurry in the fourth quarter provided a more-flattering scoreline. Sanchez might have other concerns on Thursday, too, after pulling scattershot Furman transfer QB Trey Hedden last weekend at home vs. rival New Mexico thanks to Hedden’s latest mistake-filled effort (two picks and a fumble) that prompted a switch to backup Adam Damante - a move that I-10 sources suggest will likely result in a QB switch to start this game at midweek. As Sanchez has also only won one of those last five outright at home vs. C-USA foes since late 2024, any Las Cruces edge also seems negligible at best.
Play Western Kentucky
| Western Kentucky | 24 / 38.3 | -14.3 | 41 | 21 | +15 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| New Mexico State | 29.3 / 28.3 | +1 | 45 | 40 | -3.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Western Kentucky | 09-26 | Mercyhurst | -40 | 58.5 | 52-7 | New Mexico State | 09-26 | New Mexico | +11.5 | 47.5 | 18-42 |
| | 09-19 | @ Indiana | +44.5 | 58 | 0-38 | | 09-12 | @ Hawaii | +7.5 | 50.5 | 19-29 |
| | 09-12 | @ Georgia | +40.5 | 55.5 | 20-70 | | 09-05 | Mercyhurst | -29 | 52.5 | 51-14 |
|
| 11-01-25 | New Mexico State | 16 | 53.5 | 14 | 26/66 | 13/40/1/110 | 0/0 |
| Western Kentucky | 35 | -7.5 | 24 | 38/128 | 30/41/1/301 | 2/1 |
| 11-09-24 | Western Kentucky | 41 | -18 | 17 | 34/117 | 19/28/2/297 | 0/0 |
| New Mexico State | 28 | 53.5 | 24 | 55/331 | 10/22/2/129 | 4/3 |
| Western Kentucky |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Nevada | 0 | L | 14-49 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 7-21 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Georgia | 40.5 | L | 20-70 | OV | 55.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14 | 24.5 | L | 6-49 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Indiana | 44.5 | W | 0-38 | UN | 58 | 13.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 14.5 | 26.5 | W | 0-14 | UN | 34.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Mercyhurst | -40 | W | 52-7 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 10-01-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-14-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Mexico State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Florida State | 31 | W | 17-34 | UN | 53.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 18.5 | W | 7-17 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Mercyhurst | -29 | W | 51-14 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 13-7 | OV | | | W | 23-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Hawaii | 7.5 | L | 19-29 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-9 | UN | 10 | 4 | L | 13-19 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | New Mexico | 11.5 | L | 18-42 | OV | 47.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 3-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-01-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Texas | 30 | -3 | 34 | | 36 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 2-0 | +43.5 / -25 | -18 / +21.5 |
| Tulsa | 24 | 57 | 34.5(1) | -0.5 | 34 | 26 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 0-2 | +28 / -11 | -14.5 / -3 |
Perhaps Tulsa has an excuse for last week's heavy loss at Arkansas as QB Baylor Hayes missed a second consecutive game due to a knee injury. Kennesaw State (and elsewhere) transfer Dexter Williams II has FBS starting experience in the past and he looked plenty serviceable when tossing three TDs vs. East Texas A&M on September 19, and wasn't completely helpless vs. the Razorbacks last week. Or, maybe the Golden Hurricane was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time last Saturday in Fayetteville, catching the full fury of the Razorbacks as Ryan Silverfield's troops looked intent on taking out their frustrations (for perhaps the last time this season) before SEC play resumes for them in October. Yet it also suggests that the Golden Hurricane’s early startling upset of Oklahoma State might have been a one-off, as Tulsa (with Hayes going most of the way) had a struggle vs. C-USA bottom feeder Sam Houston in the subsequent week. Meanwhile, even after head coach Eric Morris departed for Oklahoma State after last season along with several Denton stars (such as QB Drew Mestemaker and RB Caleb Hawkins), Neal Brown’s first Mean Green edition is demonstrating plenty of pop, too, scoring at a very healthy 43 points per game clip across the past three behind his own collection of portal adds including UCF transfer QB Tayven Jackson (already almost 1,200 yards passing) and West Virginia transfer RB Jaheim White (7 yards per carry), who motored for almost 1,700 rushing yards across the 2023-24 campaigns for Brown with the Mountaineers before missing almost the entirety of last season for Rich Rodriguez in Morgantown due to an early-September knee injury. Brown’s quick overall reload for the Mean Green brought in 50 new faces from the portal - many from Power 4 programs, like offensive weapons Jackson and White. Ex-SMU LB Zakye Barker (28 tackles already) and ex-Arkansas State LB Aaron Alexander are also making an early impact on the stop end. Meanwhile, though the sample size is small, and the spread minimal this week, note that Tulsa (if it stays favored) hasn’t covered the spread as chalk vs. an FBS foe in three tries since head coach Tre Lamb arrived from East Tennessee State last autumn. Moreover, as American Conference observers don't see much drop-off with Williams on the field, we're hardly sure the Golden Hurricane's chances improve greatly if Hayes is able to make the post on Thursday.
Play North Texas
10/01 7:38 AM PDT — Tulsa QB Baylor Hayes is expected to play in this contest. Hayes missed last week's loss at Arkansas with a knee injury. The Golden Hurricane offense was only able to produce one touchdown and 12 first downs with Dexter Williams II under center last week against the Razorbacks.
| North Texas | 47.3 / 23 | +24.3 | 34 | 37 | -11 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Tulsa | 23.7 / 17 | +6.7 | 33 | 43 | -15.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| North Texas | 09-26 | Houston B. | -39 | 60 | 63-14 | Tulsa | 09-26 | @ Arkansas | +7 | 51 | 6-34 |
| | 09-19 | @ Texas Sta. | +3 | 62.5 | 35-49 | | 09-19 | Texas A&M. | -41 | 56.5 | 42-0 |
| | 09-12 | UNLV | +3 | 58.5 | 44-6 | | 09-12 | @ Sam Houst. | -12.5 | 51.5 | 23-17 |
| North Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-0-2 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Indiana | 40 | W | 16-52 | OV | 57.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-14 | P | 14 | 24 | W | 6-24 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | UNLV | 3 | W | 44-6 | UN | 58.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-0 | P | 13 | 1.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas State | 3 | L | 35-49 | OV | 62.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 13.5 | 2 | W | 28-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Houston Baptist | -39 | W | 63-14 | OV | 60 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 35-14 | OV | |
| 10-01-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tulsa |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Oklahoma State | 12.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 57.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 7 | W | 10-3 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Sam Houston St | -12.5 | L | 23-17 | UN | 51.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | L | 10-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Texas A&M-Commerce | -41 | W | 42-0 | UN | 56.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Arkansas | 7 | L | 6-34 | UN | 51 | 2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | L | 0-16 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-01-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 2nd
| Pittsburgh U | 27 | 53 | 22 | | 19 | 55 | 4-0 / 0-0 | 3-1 / 0-0 | 1-3 / 0-0 | +30.8 / - | -22 / - |
| Virginia Tech | 28 | -1 | 18(3) | -7 | 18 | 34 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 1-1 | +46.5 / +8 | -36.5 / -8.5 |
This will be the first meeting between these regional foes since Virginia Tech's 38-21 home win over the Panthers in September 2023. For what it's worth, now-Virginia Tech head coach James Franklin went 3-1 against Pitt when he coached in Happy Valley, winning the last three meetings by an average of 23.7 points per game. The Hokies were forced to battle both Boston College and Mother Nature last week. Virginia Tech eventually earned a 21-14 win, but never came close to covering the lofty two-touchdown spread against the feisty Eagles. We've seen quite the change in scoring in Pitt's games through the first month of the season. The over went 9-3 in the Panthers' regular season games last year, but Pitt's defense has allowed an average of 8.5 points per game thus far (3-1 to the under). Lane Stadium will be rockin' for this one and our power ratings are in line with where this game has opened, but we're inclined to take the points with Pitt. Panthers head coach Pat Narduzzi can't be compared to Lane Kiffin when it comes to troll antics, but Narduzzi loves to push a button or two when given the opportunity. Pitt essentially had an extra week to prep for this one after beating FCS-level Bucknell 59-0 last week. Narduzzi will have something up his sleeve in this one. It appears that Hokies' QB Ethan Grunkemeyer made a good decision following Coach Franklin to Blacksburg, but let's not forget that this is a guy who entered his senior year of high school with one scholarship offer (Miami-Ohio) and was Penn State's third-string quarterback behind Drew Allar and Beau Pribula. Again, he's performed great in maroon-and-orange thus far, but we're not too far removed from Grunkemeyer throwing for 93 yards with two interceptions against Iowa or getting sacked four times against Ohio State.
Play Pitt
| Pittsburgh U | 32.7 / 6.7 | +26 | 18 | 37 | -24 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 |
| Virginia Tech | 33.3 / 20.3 | +13 | 18 | 31 | -11.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Pittsburgh U | 09-26 | Bucknell | -54.5 | 63.5 | 59-0 | Virginia Tech | 09-26 | @ Boston Co. | -14.5 | 45.5 | 21-14 |
| | 09-17 | Syracuse | -10.5 | 51 | 27-13 | | 09-19 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | 53.5 | 35-26 |
| | 09-12 | Central F. | -7 | 55 | 12-7 | | 09-12 | Old Domin. | -18 | 47.5 | 44-21 |
| Pittsburgh U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-0-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Miami Ohio | -16.5 | W | 59-14 | OV | 48 | -3.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 10 | -9.5 | W | 31-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Central Florida | -7 | L | 12-7 | UN | 55 | -3 | PK | 3-0 | UN | 13 | -4.5 | W | 12-0 | UN | 28 |
| 09-17-26 | Syracuse | -10.5 | W | 27-13 | UN | 51 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Bucknell | -54.5 | W | 59-0 | UN | 63.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 10-02-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Virginia Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | VMI | -54.5 | W | 73-3 | OV | 60.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 45-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Old Dominion | -18 | W | 44-21 | OV | 47.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-3 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | W | 34-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | W | 35-26 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -0.5 | W | 27-14 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Boston College | -14.5 | L | 21-14 | UN | 45.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Liberty | 34 | -7 | 33 | -12 | 34 | 43 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +18.5 / +5 | -21.5 / +2 |
| Delaware | 23 | 51.5 | 46(1) | | 43 | 18 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 1-1 | +21.5 / -24 | -18 / +20.5 |
Liberty earned a 59-30 home win as a 3.5-point favorite last season. Flames' running back Evan Dickens ran for 217 yards and four touchdowns on 22 attempts, while QB Ethan Vasko went 14-of-20 through the air for 221 yards and two touchdowns. After dropping the season opener at James Madison, Liberty has won its last three games. The Flames and Blue Hens share a common opponent as both teams faced (and beat) Coastal Carolina over the last two weeks. Delaware limps into this one after suffering a blow-out loss to Virginia last week. Blue Hens' QB Nick Minicucci suffered a leg injury and he is listed as doubtful on the early-week report. Minicucci threw for nearly 3,700 yards last season with 23 touchdown passes, so if he is unable to go, that will be a big loss for Delaware's offense. We're seeing some "buy" signals on Liberty at the moment, as the Flames are gaining bettors' trust slowly-but-surely with each passing week. We mentioned it last week, but it's worth repeating as time continues to pass and more results hold true. Liberty's 20-13 road loss at James Madison continues to age well when you consider the Dukes have won their last three games by a combined margin of 159-36. Since that narrow win over Liberty, JMU has covered the spread over the last three games by 38, 15.5 and 19.5 points. So yeah, Liberty out-gaining James Madison by 30 yards with a 19-15 edge in first downs looks pretty good in hindsight, despite the early-season loss.
Play Liberty
09/28 10:53 AM PDT — Blue Hens' QB Nick Minicucci suffered a leg injury in last week's loss to Virginia. Delaware's early-week injury report has Minicucci listed as doubtful.
| Liberty | 36.3 / 18.3 | +18 | 36 | 48 | -15 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Delaware | 17 / 30.3 | -13.3 | 40 | 26 | +12 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Liberty | 09-24 | @ Coastal C. | -2.5 | 50 | 34-17 | Delaware | 09-26 | @ Virginia | +20 | 52 | 3-42 |
| | 09-19 | Ball State | -14.5 | 49.5 | 51-15 | | 09-19 | Coastal C. | -4.5 | 56.5 | 22-14 |
| | 09-12 | Gardner W. | -28.5 | 54.5 | 24-23 | | 09-12 | @ Vanderbilt | +20.5 | 53.5 | 26-35 |
|
| 11-01-25 | Delaware | 30 | 52.5 | 18 | 26/76 | 29/49/1/344 | 1/0 |
| Liberty | 59 | -3.5 | 25 | 40/285 | 16/23/0/279 | 2/0 |
| Liberty |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ James Madison | 6 | L | 13-20 | UN | 51 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Gardner Webb | -28.5 | L | 24-23 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 14-6 | OV | | | L | 17-20 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Ball State | -14.5 | W | 51-15 | OV | 49.5 | -4.5 | W | 13-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 23-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-24-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | -2.5 | W | 34-17 | OV | 50 | -0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | L | 10-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-02-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Delaware |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:4-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Merrimack College | -31.5 | W | 42-7 | UN | 56.5 | 0 | W | 7-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 20.5 | W | 26-35 | OV | 53.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 11.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Coastal Carolina | -4.5 | W | 22-14 | UN | 56.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | -3 | L | 15-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Virginia | 20 | L | 3-42 | UN | 52 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 11.5 | 10.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-13-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/29 6:06 pm |
| Penn State | 20 | -3 | 17.5 | | 14 | 20 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +27.7 / +18 | -24 / -24 |
| Northwestern | 23 | 47 | 18(2) | -1.5 | 20 | 5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +25 / -6 | -9 / +20.5 |
This will be the first game at Northwestern's revamped Ryan Field, which cost roughly $850 million and will feature just 35,000 seats in an effort to keep the crowd in purple, and not attract TOO many visitors from rival schools. Northwestern earned a 22-21 road win at Beaver Stadium as a three-touchdown 'dog last season. The Wildcats held the ball for nearly 35 minutes and enjoyed a 23-13 advantage in first downs. Prior to that upset, the Nittany Lions had won the previous three meetings by an average of 20.7 points per game. Both teams are coming off disappointing losses last week. Penn State blew a 17-0 lead at home against Wisconsin, while Northwestern had a shot to upset the defending national champs but fell just short in the final minutes. For the Nittany Lions, the coaching staff has changed but the issue remains the same. During the first half of James Franklin's tenure in Happy Valley, Penn State sent wide receivers Chris Godwin, DaeSean Hamilton, KJ Hamler and Jahan Dotson to the NFL - All of whom were drafted within the first four rounds. Since Dotson was selected by the Commanders with the 16th pick in the 2022 draft, the Nittany Lions have sent ONE wide receiver to the NFL: Parker Washington in the sixth round (ended up being a great selection by Jacksonville). Penn State could not attract any notable receiving talent during Franklin's final four seasons, and it doesn't appear that Matt Campbell did any better. The under is 3-1 in Penn State's games this season, and without Koby Howard at receiver for the Nittany Lions, Campbell will likely have to revert to his Iowa State roots with some ugly, defense-first football. Last week's contest against Wisconsin saw a total of 44 points, but two of those touchdowns came directly off turnovers. As long as this game stays with a traditional script, we'd be surprised if this turned into a shootout.
Play the Under
10/01 7:34 AM PDT — Penn State cornerback Daryus Dixson is listed as questionable with an undisclosed injury.
| Penn State | 34 / 15.3 | +18.7 | 12 | 34 | -24.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Northwestern | 32.7 / 18 | +14.7 | 21 | 28 | +1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Penn State | 09-26 | Wisconsin | -9.5 | 44 | 20-24 | Northwestern | 09-25 | @ Indiana | +20.5 | 49.5 | 23-29 |
| | 09-19 | Buffalo U | -40 | 48.5 | 55-13 | | 09-19 | Colorado | -3.5 | 48 | 41-7 |
| | 09-12 | @ Temple | -24 | 49.5 | 27-9 | | 09-05 | South Dak. | -14 | 49.5 | 34-18 |
|
| 10-11-25 | Northwestern | 22 | 46.5 | 23 | 42/119 | 17/26/0/163 | 1/1 |
| Penn State | 21 | -20.5 | 13 | 31/137 | 13/20/1/137 | 1/1 |
| Penn State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-2-1 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Marshall | -23 | W | 45-0 | UN | 53.5 | -7 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Temple | -24 | L | 27-9 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | L | 10-3 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | Buffalo U | -40 | W | 55-13 | OV | 48.5 | -10.5 | W | 17-3 | OV | 13.5 | -24 | W | 34-6 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | Wisconsin | -9.5 | L | 20-24 | P | 44 | -2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6 | W | 17-7 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-02-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Northwestern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-0-1 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | South Dakota St | -14 | W | 34-18 | OV | 49.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 10-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Colorado | -3.5 | W | 41-7 | P | 48 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 21-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Indiana | 20.5 | W | 23-29 | OV | 49.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-2 | UN | 10.5 | 11.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 3rd
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/29 11:11 pm |
| Syracuse | 34 | -6.5 | 30.5 | -8 | 29 | 18 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +30 / -14 | -20 / +10.5 |
| Connecticut | 23 | 51.5 | 39.5(1) | | 41 | 35 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +12.5 / +12.5 | -5.5 / -0.5 |
Syracuse has won each of the last six meetings, but UConn has stayed within the number each of the last two years. The Orange earned a 27-20 win in overtime last season after the Huskies blew a two-score lead in the fourth quarter. Syracuse is coming off a much-needed bye after dropping back-to-back games against Cal and Pitt. The Orange averaged 12.0 penalties and 109.7 penalty yards per game through their first three games, which both ranked as the worst marks in the country. UConn returns home after splitting back-to-back road games at Southern Miss (win) and Miami-Ohio (loss). Syracuse has been such a tough team to trust this season because of the penalty issues, but after a week to figure stuff out, we can only look toward the Orange. Against Cal, Syracuse held a 437-249 edge in total yards with a 27-17 advantage in first downs but they turned the ball over three times. Against Pitt, they were almost dead-even in yards (368-347) and first downs (23-22), but Syracuse couldn't overcome ten penalties for 94 yards. The Orange are capable of playing some quality football if they can get out of their own way.
Play Syracuse
| Syracuse | 32.3 / 17 | +15.3 | 29 | 33 | -9.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Connecticut | 27.7 / 27.3 | +0.3 | 41 | 35 | +3.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Syracuse | 09-17 | @ Pittsburg. | +10.5 | 51 | 13-27 | Connecticut | 09-26 | @ Miami Ohio | +2.5 | 52.5 | 21-24 |
| | 09-12 | California | -4 | 57 | 18-21 | | 09-19 | @ So Missis. | -3.5 | 54.5 | 48-20 |
| | 09-05 | New Hamps. | -35.5 | 56.5 | 66-3 | | 09-12 | Maryland | +11 | 52.5 | 14-38 |
|
| 09-06-25 | Connecticut | 20 | 57.5 | 20 | 33/154 | 25/44/0/274 | 0/0 |
| Syracuse | 27 | -7 | 24 | 28/46 | 33/53/1/417 | 1/1 |
| 11-23-24 | Connecticut | 24 | 53 | 16 | 17/124 | 27/48/0/228 | 0/0 |
| Syracuse | 31 | -10 | 25 | 33/68 | 37/47/0/470 | 1/0 |
| Syracuse |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | New Hampshire | -35.5 | W | 66-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | California | -4 | L | 18-21 | UN | 57 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 12-7 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-17-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 10.5 | L | 13-27 | UN | 51 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Connecticut |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lafayette | -21.5 | W | 56-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Maryland | 11 | L | 14-38 | UN | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 7 | L | 7-17 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ So Mississippi | -3.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 54.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 27-6 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Ohio | 2.5 | L | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Toledo | 38 | -20.5 | 34.5 | -13 | 36 | 30 | 3-0 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-0-1 | 3-0 / 1-0 | +26.3 / -10 | -14.5 / +10 |
| Ball State | 20 | 53 | 48.5(1) | | 49 | 49 | 1-0 / 0-3 | 1-0 / 0-3 | 1-0 / 2-1 | +24 / -34 | -13.5 / +22.5 |
Toledo has won each of the last four meetings in this MAC series, including a 38-9 home win over the Cardinals last season. Yardage in that contest was fairly close (404-335) and they finished with the same number of first downs (19-19), but Ball State was unable to overcome three turnovers. The over is 4-0 in Toledo's games this season and the over is 3-1 in Ball State's contests. This is a big number for Toledo to lay on the road, and to be honest, we have some interest in the Cardinals. But we'll look to ride the over train a little bit longer, considering the Rockets are generating an average of 7.12 yards per play so far this year and Ball State has already allowed 50+ points on two occasions in September. Also, Toledo scoring 20 points at Michigan State in Week 1 is aging pretty well as the Spartans' defense has been stingy under Pat Fitzgerald.
Play the Over
| Toledo | 51 / 24.7 | +26.3 | 36 | 40 | -14.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 |
| Ball State | 23 / 31.3 | -8.3 | 48 | 47 | +1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Toledo | 09-26 | San Diego. | -2.5 | 50.5 | 41-16 | Ball State | 09-26 | @ Kent State | +2.5 | 51.5 | 13-26 |
| | 09-19 | Temple | -4.5 | 48.5 | 49-48 | | 09-19 | @ Liberty | +14.5 | 49.5 | 15-51 |
| | 09-12 | Central C. | -36.5 | 52.5 | 63-10 | | 09-12 | Stony Bro. | -13.5 | 52 | 41-17 |
|
| 11-22-25 | Ball State | 9 | 45 | 18 | 47/129 | 14/32/2/206 | 1/1 |
| Toledo | 38 | -28.5 | 19 | 30/186 | 15/27/2/218 | 0/0 |
| Toledo |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1-1 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-1-1 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Michigan State | 10 | PK | 20-30 | OV | 48.5 | 3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 6.5 | L | 7-19 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Central Conn. | -36.5 | W | 63-10 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 14-3 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Temple | -4.5 | L | 49-48 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | L | 14-24 | OV | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | San Diego State | -2.5 | W | 41-16 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ball State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Ohio State | 50 | L | 3-56 | OV | 55.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 28.5 | W | 3-28 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Stony Brook | -13.5 | W | 41-17 | OV | 52 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Liberty | 14.5 | L | 15-51 | OV | 49.5 | 4.5 | L | 7-13 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 7-23 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kent State | 2.5 | L | 13-26 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 1 | L | 0-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Temple | 24 | 50.5 | 35 | | 36 | 31 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 1-0 | +0.7 / -1 | +4.5 / +4.5 |
| South Florida | 27 | -5 | 34(2) | -3 | 31 | 48 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +26 / +6 | -26 / -7.5 |
This is the first meeting between the Owls and Bulls since South Florida earned a 27-23 home win in November 2023. Temple is a half-point away from being 4-0 against the spread this season. After getting bettors to the window against Rhode Island, Penn State and Toledo, the Owls lost by four as a 3.5-point 'dog last week against Army. Penn State transfer Jaxon Smolik has returned to practice after missing the last two games with a foot injury, but Ajani Sheppard took the majority of practice reps with the first-team offense and it appears that Sheppard will likely remain the starter for this week's clash with the Bulls. South Florida is 4-0 in Brian Hartline's debut season, but the Bulls were dreadful last week at Bowling Green. Because of Hartline's connections to Ohio, we expected South Florida to put a strong performance together against a MAC bottom-dweller. That certainly wasn't the case as the Bulls didn't find the scoreboard until 48 minutes surpassed. QB Michael Van Buren Jr. went 7-of-11 through the air for 78 passing yards, and he produced a total of 12 rushing yards on 13 carries. Against a schedule that's featured Florida International, Army, Delaware State and Bowling Green, there simply haven't been many "buy" signs on the Bulls' offense thus far.
Play Temple
| Temple | 24.7 / 32.3 | -7.7 | 36 | 26 | +10.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| South Florida | 33.7 / 15.7 | +18 | 30 | 45 | -17.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Temple | 09-25 | Army | +3.5 | 48.5 | 17-21 | South Florida | 09-26 | @ Bowling G. | -17.5 | 49 | 14-6 |
| | 09-19 | @ Toledo | +4.5 | 48.5 | 48-49 | | 09-19 | Delaware . | -37.5 | 60 | 59-17 |
| | 09-12 | Penn State | +24 | 49.5 | 9-27 | | 09-12 | @ Army | +3 | 45.5 | 28-24 |
| Temple |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Rhode Island | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 10-7 | OV | | | W | 24-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Penn State | 24 | W | 9-27 | UN | 49.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | W | 3-10 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Toledo | 4.5 | W | 48-49 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3 | W | 24-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-25-26 | Army | 3.5 | L | 17-21 | UN | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Florida Intl | -14.5 | L | 19-9 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 6-0 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Army | 3 | W | 28-24 | OV | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 23 |
| 09-19-26 | Delaware State | -37.5 | W | 59-17 | OV | 60 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 28-17 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Bowling Green | -17.5 | L | 14-6 | UN | 49 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -9.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bowling Green | 13 | 41.5 | 45.5 | | 46 | 30 | 0-2 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 2-0 | -7.5 / -48.5 | +8 / +27 |
| Miami Ohio | 23 | -10 | 41(1) | -5.5 | 36 | 40 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 2-0 | +20.5 / -24.5 | -16.5 / +15.5 |
Miami is 5-1 straight-up and against the spread in the last six meetings in this MAC series, but the RedHawks and Falcons did not play last season. Bowling Green put together its best effort of the season last week against South Florida, but the Falcons are still searching for their first win. After a heartbreaking loss to Cincinnati two weeks ago, Miami responded nicely with a 24-21 home win over UConn last week. RedHawks' starting QB David McComb is doubtful after suffering a leg injury last week against UConn. McComb threw for 312 yards and two touchdowns against the Huskies before being relieved by Caleb Heavner in the final minutes. We need a couple more data points from Bowling Green and South Florida to determine exactly what happened last week, but we're inclined to buy into some improvement from the Falcons on defense. If you can hold an American Conference team to 240 total yards and 16 first downs on 4.5 yards per play, then you can probably handle a MAC offense with a back-up quarterback. Let's see if Eddie George can get back-to-back efforts out of that unit as Bowling Green heads into conference play.
Play the Under
09/28 10:38 AM PDT — RedHawks' starting QB David McComb is doubtful after suffering a leg injury last week against UConn. McComb threw for 312 yards and two touchdowns against the Huskies before being relieved by Caleb Heavner in the final minutes.
| Bowling Green | 6.7 / 41.7 | -35 | 46 | 25 | +23.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Miami Ohio | 33.3 / 21 | +12.3 | 35 | 40 | -6 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Bowling Green | 09-26 | South Flo. | +17.5 | 49 | 6-14 | Miami Ohio | 09-26 | Connectic. | -2.5 | 52.5 | 24-21 |
| | 09-19 | @ Iowa State | +22.5 | 43.5 | 7-55 | | 09-19 | @ Cincinnat. | +14.5 | 51 | 31-35 |
| | 09-12 | @ Nebraska | +31 | 49 | 7-56 | | 09-12 | Holy Cross | -30.5 | 47 | 45-7 |
|
| 11-29-24 | Miami Ohio | 28 | 38.5 | 16 | 24/121 | 18/28/2/255 | 0/0 |
| Bowling Green | 12 | -3 | 16 | 24/51 | 27/42/1/210 | 5/0 |
| Bowling Green |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-4 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tarleton State | -1.5 | L | 13-20 | UN | 49.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | L | 7-17 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Nebraska | 31 | L | 7-56 | OV | 49 | 7 | L | 0-14 | OV | 11.5 | 17.5 | L | 0-35 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Iowa State | 22.5 | L | 7-55 | OV | 43.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | L | 7-35 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Florida | 17.5 | W | 6-14 | UN | 49 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 9.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miami Ohio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 16.5 | L | 14-59 | OV | 48 | 3.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 10 | 9.5 | L | 14-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Holy Cross | -30.5 | W | 45-7 | OV | 47 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Cincinnati U | 14.5 | W | 31-35 | OV | 51 | 3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10 | 7.5 | W | 28-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Connecticut | -2.5 | W | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Virginia | 31 | 0 | 20 | | 18 | 40 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | +40.3 / - | -23.5 / - |
| Florida State | 30 | 51.5 | 18(3) | -5 | 18 | 55 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 0-2-1 / 1-0 | 0-3 / 1-0 | +13.7 / -14 | -24.5 / +18 |
After a five-year hiatus in this ACC series, Virginia earned a 46-38 win in overtime against the Seminoles last season. Florida State out-gained the Cavaliers by 74 yards but failed to capitalize on three Virginia turnovers. The Cavaliers earned a 42-3 home win over Delaware last week, but that contest lost some of its luster after Blue Hens' QB Nick Minicucci went down with an early injury. Florida State got back in the win column with a 34-7 victory over FCS-level Central Arkansas last week. The final score looks fine, but when you commit ten penalties for 115 yards against an FCS team at home and you allow them to hold the ball for over 39 minutes with 22 first downs, you're not going to calm the nerves in Tallahassee. Florida State's defense allowed Alabama to generate 567 total yards on 8.6 yards per play. Virginia's offense isn't going to be confused with the Greatest Show on Turf anytime soon, but Beau Pribula and Co. are certainly capable of putting points on the board. Virginia generated 556 total yards and 34 first downs against Delaware last week. The Cavaliers are scoring over 40 points per game against a schedule that includes one ACC team, one Big XII team and a bowl rep from Conference-USA. We trust the Cavs to carry their share of the weight on this total.
Play the Over
| Virginia | 42.7 / 14.7 | +28 | 17 | 41 | -26 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Florida State | 31.3 / 28 | +3.3 | 19 | 25 | -8 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Virginia | 09-26 | Delaware | -20 | 52 | 42-3 | Florida State | 09-26 | Central A. | -45.5 | 63 | 34-7 |
| | 09-19 | West Virg. | -10.5 | 51.5 | 27-38 | | 09-19 | @ Alabama | +18 | 50.5 | 36-50 |
| | 09-11 | Norfolk St | -47 | 56.5 | 59-3 | | 09-07 | SMU | +3 | 52.5 | 24-27 |
|
| 09-26-25 | Florida State | 38 | -6.5 | 24 | 47/258 | 19/33/2/258 | 2/1 |
| Virginia | 46 | 59.5 | 27 | 48/211 | 26/36/3/229 | 0/0 |
| Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-1-1 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | NC State | -4 | W | 34-8 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -2.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Norfolk St | -47 | W | 59-3 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 28-3 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | West Virginia | -10.5 | L | 27-38 | OV | 51.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Delaware | -20 | W | 42-3 | UN | 52 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 11.5 | -10.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-1-1 |
| 08-29-26 | New Mexico State | -31 | L | 34-17 | UN | 53.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -18.5 | L | 17-7 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-07-26 | SMU | 3 | PK | 24-27 | UN | 52.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-17 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Alabama | 18 | W | 36-50 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 21-26 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Central Arkansas | -45.5 | L | 34-7 | UN | 63 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 24-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Vanderbilt | 17 | 50 | 18 | | 18 | 16 | 3-0 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 0-1 | +10.7 / -6 | -17.5 / +10 |
| Georgia | 35 | -25.5 | 2(3) | -19 | 3 | 11 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 3-0 / 1-0 | +46 / +28 | -33.5 / -24.5 |
Georgia is 6-0 straight-up, 5-1 against the spread in this SEC series since 2017, but the 'Dawgs and the 'Dores have not met since 2023. Vanderbilt suffered its first loss of the season at Auburn last week, but the Commodores stayed within the number thanks to a strong defensive effort. Vandy is 9-1 against the spread in its last ten SEC road games. Georgia has out-scored its first two conference opponents by a combined margin of 86-30. The 'Dawgs jumped out to a 28-0 lead in the first half against Oklahoma last week and put things on cruise control after that. We don't LOVE the idea of backing a true freshman on the road at Georgia, but after the last two weeks, Jared Curtis has seen it all. In his first career start, his Commodores pulled off arguably the most-improbable comeback in recent memory. His second start was at Jordan-Hare Stadium where he went 22-of-33 and led the team in rushing. So he's already seen and experienced plenty during his brief college career to help prepare him for this challenge. Vanderbilt used an average of 29.4 seconds between plays last season, with only a handful of teams like Iowa, Army and Navy playing at a slower pace. Don't forget, that was with a 23-year-old Heisman finalist at quarterback. With a true freshman at the helm, we expect Clark Lea to slow this one down in an effort to drag Georgia into the mud. The Bulldogs are the top team in our power ratings at the moment, but we still struggle to justify a point spread this high against an opponent that knows how to make a game ugly.
Play Vanderbilt
10/01 7:37 AM PDT — Vanderbilt QB Jarden Curtis is now listed as questionable with an undisclosed injury.
| Vanderbilt | 28.3 / 26 | +2.3 | 17 | 26 | -4.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Georgia | 52 / 16.7 | +35.3 | 3 | 25 | -25.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Vanderbilt | 09-26 | @ Auburn | +10 | 54.5 | 15-21 | Georgia | 09-26 | Oklahoma | -11 | 44 | 41-13 |
| | 09-19 | NC State | -3 | 50.5 | 35-31 | | 09-19 | @ Arkansas | -24.5 | 54.5 | 45-17 |
| | 09-12 | Delaware | -20.5 | 53.5 | 35-26 | | 09-12 | Western K. | -40.5 | 55.5 | 70-20 |
| Vanderbilt |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Austin Peay | -28.5 | L | 28-9 | UN | 57.5 | | L | 5-6 | OV | | | W | 15-9 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Delaware | -20.5 | L | 35-26 | OV | 53.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -11.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | NC State | -3 | W | 35-31 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Auburn | 10 | W | 15-21 | UN | 54.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tennessee St | -49.5 | W | 63-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Western Kentucky | -40.5 | W | 70-20 | OV | 55.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -24.5 | W | 49-6 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arkansas | -24.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | W | 21-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma | -11 | W | 41-13 | OV | 44 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7 | W | 28-0 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ohio | 27 | -3.5 | 40.5 | -6.5 | 40 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 2-0 | +15 / -16.5 | -17 / +15.5 |
| Kent State | 20 | 50.5 | 48(1) | | 48 | 49 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 2-0 | +17 / -56.5 | -6.5 / +44 |
Ohio has covered the number in each of the last four meetings, but the Bobcats and Flashes did not play last season. Ohio is hopeful to get starting QB Nick Poulos back this week after missing the last two contests. Kent State opened MAC play with a nice home win over Ball State last week. Returning QB Dru DeShields played a clean game with three touchdowns and no turnovers, but the biggest story was Kent State's defense which held the Cardinals to 46 rushing yards on 27 attempts. Keep an eye on the status of Polous, but if he's good-to-go, we have this game lined closer to a touchdown in Ohio's favor. Kent State has certainly shown improvement over the last two seasons under Mark Carney, but historically speaking, there is still a decent-sized gap between these two programs. Talent ratings are certainly not a bible, but even with last year's improvement under Carney, the Flashes still attracted the second-worst class of incoming talent according to 247Sports' composite ratings. Until the Flashes show us otherwise, we believe there is larger than a three-point gap between these programs.
Play Ohio
| Ohio | 33.3 / 25 | +8.3 | 40 | 45 | -9 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Kent State | 21.7 / 29 | -7.3 | 49 | 36 | +13 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Ohio | 09-26 | Stonehill | -32 | 53.5 | 35-7 | Kent State | 09-26 | Ball State | -2.5 | 51.5 | 26-13 |
| | 09-19 | @ South Ala. | +7 | 49.5 | 36-41 | | 09-19 | @ Ohio State | +52 | 58.5 | 3-59 |
| | 09-12 | Jacksonvi. | -1.5 | 49 | 29-27 | | 09-12 | Wofford | -10 | 46 | 36-15 |
|
| 11-06-24 | Ohio | 41 | -20.5 | 23 | 42/258 | 15/25/0/149 | 1/1 |
| Kent State | 0 | 53 | 7 | 34/52 | 8/18/1/62 | 1/0 |
| Ohio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Nebraska | 23.5 | L | 21-49 | OV | 47.5 | 7 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10 | 13.5 | W | 13-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Jacksonville St | -1.5 | W | 29-27 | OV | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10 | -0.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ South Alabama | 7 | W | 36-41 | OV | 49.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Stonehill | -32 | L | 35-7 | UN | 53.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kent State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ South Carolina | 35.5 | L | 0-57 | OV | 53 | 9.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 21 | L | 0-29 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wofford | -10 | W | 36-15 | OV | 46 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | L | 14-15 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Ohio State | 52 | L | 3-59 | OV | 58.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14.5 | 31.5 | L | 0-35 | UN | 35.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Ball State | -2.5 | W | 26-13 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1 | W | 17-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kentucky | 27 | 53 | 18.5 | | 20 | 42 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 1-0 | +9.3 / +10 | -11.5 / +17 |
| South Carolina | 31 | -2.5 | 19.5(3) | -2 | 17 | 7 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 1-0 | +28.7 / -31 | -28 / +11.5 |
South Carolina has won-and-covered each of the last four meetings, including a 35-13 home win over the Wildcats last season. That final score crept over the closing total (47.5) by a half-point, which broke a string of four-straight unders between the Gamecocks and Wildcats. Kentucky held a 10-7 lead at the end of the first quarter before South Carolina generated back-to-back defensive touchdowns in the span of 45 seconds. Shane Beamer could certainly use a bounce-back performance after his squad was thrashed by Mississippi State and Alabama over the last two weeks. Gamecocks' star defensive end Dylan Stewart has been suspended indefinitely after some unusual outbursts in Saturday's loss at Alabama. Stewart was seen punching a Crimson Tide offensive lineman late in the game, and that came after a brief altercation with the South Carolina coaching staff regarding his substitutions and playing time. Frankly, we're not sure what to expect in this one. Kentucky is likely going to be a popular underdog pick this week, but that upset win at Texas A&M lost a little bit of luster after the Aggies got crushed by LSU last week. Perhaps losing Stewart will light a jolt under the rest of the South Carolina roster because it certainly didn't appear that he was contributing much from a positive attitude standpoint. We were on the over in South Carolina's game against Alabama last week, and we're fine with going right back to the same well. Ignoring each team's game against FCS-level competition, the over has gone a combined 6-0 against FBS foes. The Gamecocks' defense allowed Tide QB Keelon Russell to go 21-of-27 for 365 yards with four touchdowns last week. Kentucky QB Kenny Minchey could be poised for a nice break-out performance in this one.
Play the Over
09/28 10:40 AM PDT — Gamecocks' star defensive end Dylan Stewart has been suspended indefinitely after some unusual outbursts in Saturday's loss at Alabama. Stewart was seen punching a Crimson Tide offensive lineman late in the game, and that came after a brief altercation with the South Carolina coaching staff regarding his substitutions and playing time.
| Kentucky | 31 / 29 | +2 | 20 | 19 | +2 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| South Carolina | 32.3 / 33 | -0.7 | 16 | 27 | -12 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Kentucky | 09-26 | South Ala. | -20.5 | 54.5 | 45-21 | South Carolina | 09-26 | @ Alabama | +11.5 | 53 | 18-49 |
| | 09-19 | @ Texas A&M | +17 | 48.5 | 31-21 | | 09-19 | Mississip. | -3.5 | 60 | 34-41 |
| | 09-12 | Alabama | +9 | 47.5 | 17-45 | | 09-12 | Towson | -44.5 | 57.5 | 45-9 |
|
| 09-27-25 | Kentucky | 13 | 47 | 14 | 41/108 | 10/19/2/124 | 3/2 |
| South Carolina | 35 | -5.5 | 20 | 48/178 | 12/15/0/163 | 1/0 |
| Kentucky |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Youngstown St | -22.5 | W | 45-13 | UN | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama | 9 | L | 17-45 | OV | 47.5 | 3 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 5.5 | W | 17-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas A&M | 17 | W | 31-21 | OV | 48.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Alabama | -20.5 | W | 45-21 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Kent State | -35.5 | W | 57-0 | OV | 53 | -9.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21 | W | 29-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Towson | -44.5 | L | 45-9 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Mississippi St | -3.5 | L | 34-41 | OV | 60 | -0.5 | W | 13-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 23-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Alabama | 11.5 | L | 18-49 | OV | 53 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | L | 10-35 | OV | 27 |
| 10-03-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Eastern Michigan | 23 | 48.5 | 45 | | 45 | 55 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 0-3 / 1-1 | +10.3 / -36 | -11 / +20.5 |
| Massachusetts | 31 | -5.5 | 42.5(1) | -3.5 | 44 | 53 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 2-0 | 0-2 / 1-1 | +24.5 / +22.5 | -27.5 / +12 |
Eastern Michigan has won each of the last four meetings, but the Eagles and Minutemen did not play last season. Each of the last three meetings have stayed under the total with those three contests seeing an average of 37.0 points per game. UMass returns home with a perfect record still intact after crushing Sacramento State 35-6. Virginia Tech transfer Pop Watson III played another clean game with three touchdowns and no turnovers. Eastern Michigan earned a 29-3 home win over FCS-level Lindenwood last week. We're interested to see what the Eagles' offense looks like in this one, presumably without top receiver Nick Devereaux who was injured against Wisconsin two weeks ago. We are fully aware that the Minutemen hype train is roaring down the tracks, but we're still interested in UMass laying under a touchdown. Flying across the country and playing (arguably) the worst team in the country in an empty stadium last week, UMass had a million built-in excuses that they could have used for a flat spot against Sacramento State. The Minutemen didn't need them. UMass opened the game with a 75-yards touchdown drive then forced the Hornets to go three-and-out on their first possession. That is the sign of a well-coached team. Perhaps Joe Harasymiak learned a few things about cross-country travel after his three years as Rutgers' defensive coordinator, traveling to destinations in California, Oregon and Washington for conference play. We weren't afraid to back the Minutemen on their trek out to the West Coast, and we're not afraid to back them in their first game back home.
Play UMass
| Eastern Michigan | 15.3 / 30.7 | -15.3 | 45 | 33 | +5.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Massachusetts | 36 / 10 | +26 | 42 | 54 | -20 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Eastern Michigan | 09-26 | Lindenwood | -24 | 53 | 29-3 | Massachusetts | 09-26 | @ Sacrament. | -6 | 49 | 35-6 |
| | 09-19 | @ Wisconsin | +23.5 | 44 | 10-54 | | 09-19 | Stonehill | -31 | 51 | 36-14 |
| | 09-12 | @ Michigan . | +17.5 | 49.5 | 7-35 | | 09-12 | Sacred He. | -23.5 | 53.5 | 37-10 |
| Eastern Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Sacramento State | -8.5 | W | 28-17 | UN | 53 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-04-26 | San Jose State | -1 | L | 21-27 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 0 | L | 7-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Michigan State | 17.5 | L | 7-35 | UN | 49.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 26 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Wisconsin | 23.5 | L | 10-54 | OV | 44 | 6.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Lindenwood | -24 | W | 29-3 | UN | 53 | | W | 13-0 | OV | | | W | 19-0 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Massachusetts |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Rutgers | 29.5 | W | 37-21 | OV | 55 | 7.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 17.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Sacred Heart | -23.5 | W | 37-10 | UN | 53.5 | | W | 17-0 | OV | | | W | 23-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Stonehill | -31 | L | 36-14 | UN | 51 | | W | 13-7 | OV | | | W | 13-7 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Sacramento State | -6 | W | 35-6 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 21-6 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miami Florida | 38 | -14 | 4.5 | -12.5 | 5 | 45 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 1-1 | +59.5 / +26 | -50.5 / -22.5 |
| Clemson | 13 | 49 | 20(3) | | 18 | 25 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +11.5 / -13.5 | -11.5 / +4 |
This is the first meeting between the Tigers and 'Canes since Miami earned a 28-20 win in overtime in October 2023. After a blow-out loss at LSU to open the year, Clemson has gotten things back on track with a trio of wins against Georgia Southern, North Carolina and Cal. Freshman QB Tait Reynolds did JUST enough to help the Tigers past the Bears last week in a game that featured a fumble return for a touchdown and a 65-yard punt return for a touchdown. After getting a scare from Wake Forest two weeks ago, Miami handled business against Central Michigan last week. Dating back to last year's national semifinals, five of Miami's last six games have gone over the total. From a power ratings' standpoint, we understand why this game is lined where it is and we actually show value on Clemson as a home 'dog. But in terms of the matchup, this is about as bad as it gets for the Tigers. From an athlete perspective, we've already seen that Clemson can't keep up with top-notch speed and strength. LSU's athletes ran past the Tigers at every opportunity in the season opener, and Miami's track stars will likely do the same. If you've been following the newsletter all season, you've seen us mention Miami's injuries in the defensive secondary a couple times over the first month. With a veteran QB in Gio Lopez and a dynamic passing game, a team like Wake Forest is equipped to capitalize on that hole against the 'Canes. Clemson is not. Reynolds is making the third start of his college career, and he's been operating with training wheels over the last few weeks. From a matchup standpoint, there's not much to like on the Clemson side and this one could get ugly.
Play Miami (Fla)
| Miami Florida | 54 / 10 | +44 | 5 | 41 | -40 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Clemson | 24.7 / 12.3 | +12.3 | 19 | 29 | -8.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Miami Florida | 09-26 | Central M. | -41 | 52 | 52-3 | Clemson | 09-25 | @ California | -2.5 | 52 | 24-10 |
| | 09-18 | @ Wake Fore. | -20 | 55.5 | 33-20 | | 09-19 | North Car. | -3 | 44.5 | 28-20 |
| | 09-10 | Florida A. | -59.5 | 66.5 | 77-7 | | 09-12 | Georgia S. | -19.5 | 54.5 | 22-7 |
| Miami Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:4-0-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Stanford | -24.5 | W | 45-6 | OV | 46.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | -14 | W | 28-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-10-26 | Florida A&M | -59.5 | W | 77-7 | OV | 66.5 | -16.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 17.5 | -36.5 | W | 49-0 | OV | 38.5 |
| 09-18-26 | @ Wake Forest | -20 | L | 33-20 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -11 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Central Michigan | -41 | W | 52-3 | OV | 52 | -10.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -24 | W | 35-3 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Clemson |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ LSU | 10 | L | 10-51 | OV | 49 | 3 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia Southern | -19.5 | L | 22-7 | UN | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11 | L | 16-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | North Carolina | -3 | W | 28-20 | OV | 44.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 7.5 | -1.5 | L | 6-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ California | -2.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 52 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Charleston Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Stanford | 16 | 54 | 31 | | 31 | 23 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 3-0 / 0-1 | -7.3 / -28 | +7.5 / +10 |
| Wake Forest | 33 | -14.5 | 18.5(1) | -13.5 | 21 | 14 | 1-1 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +4.5 / +2.5 | -4 / +4.5 |
While the wine-and-cheese crowd in Palo Alto likely celebrated with a new bottle of Napa Valley Cabernet after last Saturday’s win over Georgia Tech, the real sharpies at the tech firms in the Silicon Valley are still a bit hesitant to look upon that result as a buy signal for Tavita Pritchard’s Stanford, which now has to make a second long trip to the Eastern Time Zone in two weeks...and this time for an early kickoff to boot. Remember, the last venture to Tobacco Road didn’t end well on September 19 at Duke, and road trips in general have been pretty difficult lately for the Cardinal, which has now lost 12 in a row straight-up away from the Farm and has been within three TDs just once (at Bill Belichick’s dull-edged North Carolina) in its last seven ACC road trips away from the Bay Area, which excludes the short ride up to Berkeley to face Big Game rival Cal in 2024. True, had QB Davis Warren played at former stop Michigan like he looked last weekend with 396 passing yards and three TD passes vs. the disappointing Yellow Jackets, he might never have left Ann Arbor. But the same Warren had tossed only two TD passes across the first three games this season and was mostly ineffective in that 35-7 loss in Durham two weeks ago. We’re more inclined to buy on Wake Forest, as Jake Dickert continues to impress with his Deacs after notching their second Power 4 road win of the season in last Saturday’s rousing upset of 16th-ranked Louisville. That result came one week after making ACC powerhouse Miami sweat more than a bit the previous Friday at Winston-Salem...the same ‘Canes who blew out Stanford earlier in September. All it seems to have taken for Dickert's transfer QB Gio Lopez to flash the form he did when impressing at South Alabama two years ago was to escape Belichick’s stifling atmosphere in Chapel Hill, where Lopez was mostly ineffective last season. Now already on eight TD passes vs. just one pick through four weeks and a functional infantry behind holdover Ty Clark II and frosh Deuce Lawrence, the Deacons offense is balanced nicely aside Lopez. Though Wake’s “Made in the Dark” motto has been taken rather literally by the national media that has been slow to take notice, Dickert is now an impressive 12-5 straight-up since moving from Washington State last season while the Deacs have covered five of their last six at home, with the only spread loss in that span a backdoor cover by Akron in the opener when the Zips would sneak inside of a near four-TD spread in the last 30 seconds.
Play Wake Forest
| Stanford | 15.7 / 35.7 | -20 | 30 | 16 | +12.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Wake Forest | 29.3 / 32 | -2.7 | 23 | 15 | +9.5 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Stanford | 09-26 | Georgia T. | +3 | 48 | 34-27 | Wake Forest | 09-26 | @ Louisville | +11 | 57.5 | 30-27 |
| | 09-19 | @ Duke | +10 | 51.5 | 7-35 | | 09-18 | Miami Flo. | +20 | 55.5 | 20-33 |
| | 09-04 | Miami Flo. | +24.5 | 46.5 | 6-45 | | 09-12 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | 51.5 | 38-36 |
|
| 10-26-24 | Wake Forest | 27 | -3 | 23 | 47/173 | 20/30/1/245 | 1/1 |
| Stanford | 24 | 53 | 23 | 27/108 | 29/40/3/238 | 5/1 |
| Stanford |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Hawaii | -4.5 | W | 37-27 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10 | -3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24 |
| 09-04-26 | Miami Florida | 24.5 | L | 6-45 | OV | 46.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | 14 | L | 6-28 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Duke | 10 | L | 7-35 | UN | 51.5 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Georgia Tech | 3 | W | 34-27 | OV | 48 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-20 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Elon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wake Forest |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:4-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Akron | -28 | L | 38-16 | OV | 50.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -16.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | L | 38-36 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -1 | W | 17-10 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-18-26 | Miami Florida | 20 | W | 20-33 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 11 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Louisville | 11 | W | 30-27 | UN | 57.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 7 | W | 24-21 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Merrimack College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisville | 34 | -5 | 17 | -2.5 | 15 | 23 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | +17.7 / - | -17.5 / - |
| NC State | 28 | 56.5 | 21.5(2) | | 21 | 39 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 1-1 | +41.5 / -15 | -23.5 / +3.5 |
This is the first meeting between the Cardinals and Wolfpack since NC State earned a 13-10 home win in September 2023. Five of the last six meetings in this ACC series have stayed under the total. NC State was able to quiet the "oh no, not again" fears in Raleigh with a 41-31 home win over App State. After blowing a 17-point lead the week before at Vanderbilt, the Wolfpack blew a 21-point lead against the Mountaineers before regaining control in the final minutes of the fourth quarter. Louisville fell to 2-2 after dropping a home game to Wake Forest as a double-digit favorite last week. The Cardinals’ early-week injury report has QB Lincoln Kienholz listed as questionable with a lower-body injury. Kienholz was sacked four times last week against the Demon Deacons and finished the game with -19 rushing yards. Some early-week money has shown on NC State in this contest as bettors try to get ahead of any news related to Kienholz. This number is right in line with where our power ratings are, so we're content with sitting on the sidelines in this one. NC State does profile similar to the Wake Forest team that upset the Cardinals last week. Louisville potentially finding three losses before the first full week of October would be quite surprising considering how well Kienholz was
playing at the start of the year.
09/28 10:43 AM PDT — Louisville's early-week injury report has QB Lincoln Kienholz listed as questionable with a lower-body injury. Kienholz was sacked four times last week against Wake Forest and finished the game with -19 rushing yards.
| Louisville | 42.3 / 24.7 | +17.7 | 15 | 31 | -17.5 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| NC State | 48.3 / 22 | +26.3 | 22 | 37 | -14.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Louisville | 09-26 | Wake Fore. | -11 | 57.5 | 27-30 | NC State | 09-26 | Appalachi. | -13 | 56 | 41-31 |
| | 09-19 | SMU | -3 | 57.5 | 41-31 | | 09-19 | @ Vanderbilt | +3 | 50.5 | 31-35 |
| | 09-11 | Villanova | -39 | 56.5 | 59-13 | | 09-11 | Richmond | -33.5 | 50.5 | 73-0 |
| Louisville |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Mississippi | 6.5 | W | 38-41 | OV | 54.5 | 3 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | 4 | PK | 6-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Villanova | -39 | W | 59-13 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 17-3 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-10 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | SMU | -3 | W | 41-31 | OV | 57.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Wake Forest | -11 | L | 27-30 | UN | 57.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 21-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| NC State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-0-1 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Virginia | 4 | L | 8-34 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 2.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Richmond | -33.5 | W | 73-0 | OV | 50.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 49-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 3 | L | 31-35 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Appalachian St | -13 | L | 41-31 | OV | 56 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | W | 28-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Memphis | 41 | -18.5 | 26.5 | -24.5 | 26 | 55 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 1-1 | +21 / -6 | -22 / +7 |
| Charlotte | 17 | 52 | 52(1) | | 51 | 36 | 0-2 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 0-2 | -14.5 / -18.5 | -6 / +30.5 |
This is the third meeting between the Tigers and 49ers since joining The American Conference. Memphis won each of the first two, but Charlotte stayed within the number as a 'dog in both contests. The 49ers are still searching for their first win over an FBS-level foe since 2024. Charlotte's only touchdown last week against Louisiana came off a fumble return. The 49ers' offense produced a total of 137 yards and six first downs against the Ragin' Cajuns. Quarterbacks Cole Gonzales and Conner Harrell combined for 111 passing yards on 29 attempts. Memphis is coming off a bye week after previously beating FCS-level Tennessee-Martin the week prior. This is the type of game where the Tigers should thrive as a big favorite. The Memphis defensive line generated six sacks against UNLV in Week 0. With Charlotte unable to produce a balanced attack on offense, the Tigers will be able to pin their ears back and rush the passer on every down. Memphis has a revenge game against UAB on deck next week, but coming off a bye week, Tigers head coach Charles Huff probably won't be in much of a rush to take his foot off the gas. Huff is 5-2 against the spread as a double-digit favorite over the last three seasons at Memphis, Southern Miss and Marshall. A disciple of the James Franklin coaching tree, Huff has learned the benefits of tacking on the occasional late touchdown...or two.
Play Memphis
| Memphis | 35.7 / 27.7 | +8 | 26 | 38 | -11.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Charlotte | 12.3 / 33.7 | -21.3 | 52 | 28 | +23 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Memphis | 09-19 | Tenn Mart. | -33.5 | 58.5 | 45-21 | Charlotte | 09-26 | Louisiana | +9 | 49 | 7-34 |
| | 09-12 | @ Boise Sta. | +9.5 | 55 | 20-38 | | 09-19 | @ Appalachi. | +16.5 | 52.5 | 21-26 |
| | 09-05 | Arkansas . | -10.5 | 52.5 | 42-24 | | 09-12 | @ Mississip. | +44 | 59.5 | 9-41 |
|
| 10-26-24 | Charlotte | 28 | 56.5 | 13 | 30/113 | 9/22/2/190 | 0/0 |
| Memphis | 33 | -17 | 23 | 48/212 | 20/32/1/212 | 0/0 |
| Memphis |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ UNLV | 4.5 | W | 27-21 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13 | 3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 28 |
| 09-05-26 | Arkansas St | -10.5 | W | 42-24 | OV | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 21-17 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Boise State | 9.5 | L | 20-38 | OV | 55 | 3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | 6 | W | 20-17 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tenn Martin | -33.5 | L | 45-21 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 24-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Charlotte |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-4 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:0-3 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Citadel | -20.5 | L | 41-43 | OV | 49 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Mississippi | 44 | W | 9-41 | UN | 59.5 | 13.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14.5 | 27.5 | W | 0-27 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Appalachian St | 16.5 | W | 21-26 | UN | 52.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-13 | UN | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Louisiana | 9 | L | 7-34 | UN | 49 | 2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 5.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Western Michigan | 27 | -13 | 36 | -14 | 36 | 20 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +5 / +3 | -11 / +10 |
| Buffalo U | 13 | 46 | 51(1) | | 47 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 2-0 | +3.5 / -27.5 | -23.5 / +24 |
Western Michigan has won each of the last four meetings, with the last one being a 48-41 road win at Buffalo in October 2024. The Broncos are licking their wounds after falling 32-7 at home against Boise State in a showcase opportunity last week. Western Michigan's offense was held to 223 yards and 12 first downs against the visitors from Boise. Buffalo is 0-4 against the spread this season after narrowly beating FCS-level Robert Morris last week as a four-touchdown favorite. Through the first four games, the Bulls have fallen short of point spread expectations by an average of 11.8 points per game. Some early money has shown on the under in this contest, and we agree with it. The Broncos' offense has its limitations, but that would be a kind classification if we were talking about Buffalo. The Bulls have turned to Jason Wright to run the offense, but he generated 5.0 yards per pass attempt with two interceptions last week against the Colonials. If Sacramento State hadn't made the jump from the FCS level, the Bulls would likely be the leading candidate for worst team in the country this season. If you can't generate five yards per play against Robert Morris, we're not giving you much of a shot to find the end zone against Western Michigan.
Play the Under
| Western Michigan | 28 / 22.3 | +5.7 | 35 | 40 | -9.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Buffalo U | 21.3 / 38.7 | -17.3 | 47 | 36 | +6.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Western Michigan | 09-26 | Boise Sta. | +8 | 50.5 | 7-32 | Buffalo U | 09-26 | Robert Mo. | -28 | 46.5 | 31-28 |
| | 09-19 | @ Rice | -7.5 | 43.5 | 28-21 | | 09-19 | @ Penn State | +40 | 48.5 | 13-55 |
| | 09-12 | Monmouth | -29.5 | 54.5 | 49-14 | | 09-12 | @ Florida I. | +8 | 47.5 | 20-33 |
|
| 10-19-24 | Western Michigan | 48 | -1 | 27 | 40/209 | 20/31/0/280 | 1/1 |
| Buffalo U | 41 | 49.5 | 23 | 34/242 | 22/34/0/309 | 4/1 |
| Western Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Michigan | 27.5 | W | 12-13 | UN | 50.5 | 7 | W | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Monmouth | -29.5 | W | 49-14 | OV | 54.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rice | -7.5 | L | 28-21 | OV | 43.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Boise State | 8 | L | 7-32 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-8 | UN | 9.5 | 4.5 | L | 0-15 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Buffalo U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-4 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Albany | -18.5 | L | 21-17 | UN | 47.5 | 0 | L | 0-7 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 14-10 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Florida Intl | 8 | L | 20-33 | OV | 47.5 | 3 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10 | 5.5 | L | 6-21 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Penn State | 40 | L | 13-55 | OV | 48.5 | 10.5 | L | 3-17 | OV | 13.5 | 24 | L | 6-34 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | Robert Morris | -28 | L | 31-28 | OV | 46.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | 14-14 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Maryland | 13 | 52.5 | 27 | | 24 | 19 | 1-2 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 1-0 | 3-0 / 0-1 | +0.7 / +24 | -13.5 / -11 |
| Nebraska | 34 | -14.5 | 14(3) | -16 | 15 | 22 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 0-1 | +34.7 / +18 | -27.5 / -5.5 |
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it’s more than likely a duck. As the eye-test doesn’t always deceive, it’s more than likely these two Big Ten entries are ships passing in the night, each heading in the opposite direction at record speed. If under-fire Mike Locksley hangs onto his job at Maryland after last week’s humiliating 54-3 beatdown administered by a rampant UCLA, which emptied the stands by halftime in College Park like there was a lightning alert, Big Ten insiders report it’s only likely because AD Jim Smith is figuring out how to best handle Locksley’s buyout, which in modern coaching terms at around $9 million isn’t too prohibitive. Beyond the normal soft non-league slate that has padded Locksley’s W-L record with the Terps, the Big Ten looks an even more-sobering reality this season after Locksley’s teams have annually faded as the conference season progresses, and now just 2-17 straight-up in loop play the past 2+ campaigns. With sophomore QB Malik Washington’s confidence looking completely shot after a four-INT debacle (with two pick-sixes) against the Bruins, expecting things to get any better vs. the resurgent Huskers in Lincoln seems far-fetched. As much as the Terps are headed in the wrong direction, Matt Rhule looks like he finally has Nebraska on the way up, threatening the top-25 after a 4-0 start and a convincing 31-13 win last week at Michigan State. Ex-Virginia and UNLV dual-threat QB Anthony Colandrea might have been one of the sneaky-good portal adds in the nation after he accounted for nearly 300 yards via the ground and air in East Lansing, continuing a near-flawless beginning to his Nebraska tenure now with ten TD passes (vs. just one pick) despite being pulled a bit early by Rhule in a couple of preceding romps past Bowling Green and North Dakota. Moreover, the Huskers are running the ball almost like the Tom Osborne era at 237 yards per game and nearly 6 yards per carr, and with enough backfield depth that the infantry didn’t suffer too much when freshman star RB Jamal Rule left early vs. the Spartans due to a leg injury. The modern version of Bob Devaney’s long-ago “Black Shirt Defense” ranks fifth nationally, allowing just 233 yards per game. It begins to get real for Nebraska the next two weeks vs. Indiana and Oregon, but until then, it's still fun time in Lincoln, while this season’s reality seems to have already set in for the Terps.
Play Nebraska
| Maryland | 22.3 / 34.3 | -12 | 23 | 26 | -2 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Nebraska | 40.3 / 9 | +31.3 | 17 | 41 | -21.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Maryland | 09-26 | UCLA | +2.5 | 55.5 | 3-54 | Nebraska | 09-26 | @ Michigan . | -5.5 | 49 | 31-13 |
| | 09-19 | Virginia . | +2.5 | 53.5 | 26-35 | | 09-19 | North Dak. | -27.5 | 56.5 | 34-7 |
| | 09-12 | @ Connectic. | -11 | 52.5 | 38-14 | | 09-12 | Bowling G. | -31 | 49 | 56-7 |
|
| 10-11-25 | Nebraska | 34 | -7 | 23 | 30/193 | 20/29/3/260 | 0/0 |
| Maryland | 31 | 47.5 | 18 | 30/130 | 27/37/0/249 | 0/0 |
| Maryland |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Hampton | -45.5 | W | 62-0 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 17-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Connecticut | -11 | W | 38-14 | UN | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -7 | W | 17-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Virginia Tech | 2.5 | L | 26-35 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 0.5 | L | 14-27 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | UCLA | 2.5 | L | 3-54 | OV | 55.5 | 0 | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nebraska |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Ohio | -23.5 | W | 49-21 | OV | 47.5 | -7 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10 | -13.5 | L | 14-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Bowling Green | -31 | W | 56-7 | OV | 49 | -7 | W | 14-0 | OV | 11.5 | -17.5 | W | 35-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Dakota | -27.5 | L | 34-7 | UN | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 17-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Michigan State | -5.5 | W | 31-13 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | W | 24-10 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Old Dominion | 27 | 51.5 | 40.5 | | 38 | 26 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 0-3 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 1-0 | -2.7 / -23 | -12.5 / +18 |
| Georgia State | 19 | -1 | 41(1) | -0.5 | 46 | 49 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +35 / 0 | -18.5 / +12.5 |
Since becoming conference foes in the Sun Belt, all four meetings between Old Dominion and Georgia State have stayed under their respective totals. Old Dominion has won each of the last three meetings, including a 27-10 home win last season. Georgia State is 4-0 against the spread this season following last week's 35-14 home win over Northern Illinois. The Panthers have out-performed point spread expectations by an average of 14.5 points per game thus far. Old Dominion QB Quinn Henicle is questionable to return this week after missing last week's loss to James Madison with an undisclosed ailment. Freshman Ryan Huff went 20-of-39 for 261 passing yards in Henicle's absence, but he was sacked nine times against the Dukes' defense. Keep an eye on Henicle's status, but if he is good-to-go, we have some interest in the Monarchs. Georgia State was widely viewed as a bottom-10 (perhaps bottom-5) team in the country heading into this season, so Dell McGee has done a very nice job in Atlanta. But per Jeff Sagarin's college football ratings, Old Dominion has played the No. 76 schedule in the country while Georgia State has played the No. 145 schedule. There are only 138 FBS-level teams, so at least six FCS teams have played a harder schedule than the Panthers have. We tip our cap for handling business against Kennesaw State and Northern Illinois, but ODU is a solid program from the Sun Belt and there is quite the talent gap between these squads.
Play Old Dominion
10/01 7:36 AM PDT — Old Dominion QB Quinn Henicle is expected to play in this contest after missing last week's loss to James Madison with an undisclosed ailment. Freshman Ryan Huff went 20-of-39 for 261 passing yards in Henicle's absence, but he was sacked nine times against the Dukes' defense.
| Old Dominion | 19.3 / 36.7 | -17.3 | 36 | 26 | +7.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Georgia State | 32 / 25 | +7 | 48 | 39 | +5.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Old Dominion | 09-26 | James Mad. | +7 | 44 | 20-46 | Georgia State | 09-26 | No Illino. | -8.5 | 56.5 | 35-14 |
| | 09-19 | East Caro. | -2.5 | 49 | 17-20 | | 09-19 | @ Central F. | +17.5 | 50.5 | 30-44 |
| | 09-12 | @ Virginia . | +18 | 47.5 | 21-44 | | 09-12 | @ Kennesaw . | +7.5 | 55.5 | 31-17 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Georgia State | 10 | 58.5 | 15 | 30/129 | 18/37/1/154 | 0/0 |
| Old Dominion | 27 | -29 | 27 | 54/303 | 9/22/1/106 | 2/1 |
| 10-12-24 | Old Dominion | 21 | 53 | 18 | 42/210 | 14/23/1/141 | 0/0 |
| Georgia State | 14 | -3 | 19 | 28/57 | 28/46/1/260 | 3/1 |
| Old Dominion |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Norfolk St | -41.5 | L | 31-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 18 | L | 21-44 | OV | 47.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | L | 6-34 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | East Carolina | -2.5 | L | 17-20 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | James Madison | 7 | L | 20-46 | OV | 44 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | L | 17-30 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | N. Carolina A&T | -28.5 | W | 59-10 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kennesaw State | 7.5 | W | 31-17 | UN | 55.5 | 2.5 | W | 6-3 | UN | 12.5 | 4.5 | W | 21-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Florida | 17.5 | W | 30-44 | OV | 50.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 24-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | No Illinois | -8.5 | W | 35-14 | UN | 56.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia Southern | 31 | -2.5 | 39.5 | -2.5 | 39 | 17 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +8.5 / -9.5 | -6 / +11.5 |
| Coastal Carolina | 28 | 53 | 43(1) | | 44 | 35 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +10.5 / -7.5 | -17 / +13 |
Georgia Southern has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings, including a 45-40 home win over the Chanticleers last season. The Eagles generated 648 total yards, clearing the 300-yard mark in both passing and rushing yards. Georgia Southern is only a half-point away from being undefeated at the betting window this season. The Eagles lost by four at Jacksonville State as a 3.5-point road 'dog, but Georgia Southern stayed within the number against both Clemson and Houston. Both teams are looking for their first win over an FBS-level opponent. Coastal Carolina had a couple extra days to prepare for this one after falling at home to Liberty last Thursday. There's been room for more scoring in Coastal Carolina's games this season, and the Eagles look like a team that can push that issue. The Chanticleers fell behind 24-0 in the second quarter in the opener against West Virginia, then the Mountaineers simply stopped playing after halftime. Against Delaware, Coastal's defense allowed Blue Hens QB Nick Minicucci to go 24-of-32 with over 300 passing yards, but the Chants fumbled twice which killed any opportunity for that game to go over the total. Coastal took a 17-10 lead into halftime last week against Liberty then didn't score in the second half. So the offense has been floating around these Coastal games, but we haven't seen a full 60-minute effort. After they combined to score 85 points last year, perhaps Georgia State is the team to push Coastal in the right direction.
Play the Over
| Georgia Southern | 20.7 / 31.7 | -11 | 39 | 24 | +13.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Coastal Carolina | 25.3 / 21 | +4.3 | 43 | 43 | -10 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Georgia Southern | 09-26 | Houston U | +17 | 56.5 | 28-42 | Coastal Carolina | 09-24 | Liberty | +2.5 | 50 | 17-34 |
| | 09-19 | @ Jacksonvi. | +3.5 | 51.5 | 27-31 | | 09-19 | @ Delaware | +4.5 | 56.5 | 14-22 |
| | 09-12 | @ Clemson | +19.5 | 54.5 | 7-22 | | 09-12 | Fordham | -36.5 | 54 | 45-7 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Coastal Carolina | 40 | 59 | 24 | 38/204 | 19/36/1/278 | 1/0 |
| Georgia Southern | 45 | -3 | 24 | 40/312 | 24/35/1/341 | 4/1 |
| 11-23-24 | Georgia Southern | 26 | 59.5 | 21 | 38/91 | 25/38/0/294 | 2/1 |
| Coastal Carolina | 6 | -2 | 12 | 24/163 | 11/32/3/127 | 1/1 |
| Georgia Southern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Charleston Southern | -28.5 | W | 31-0 | UN | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 24-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Clemson | 19.5 | W | 7-22 | UN | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11 | W | 7-16 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 3.5 | L | 27-31 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 24-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Houston U | 17 | W | 28-42 | OV | 56.5 | 4.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 10 | L | 14-28 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Coastal Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ West Virginia | 21 | W | 24-31 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Fordham | -36.5 | W | 45-7 | UN | 54 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Delaware | 4.5 | L | 14-22 | UN | 56.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | W | 14-15 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-24-26 | Liberty | 2.5 | L | 17-34 | OV | 50 | 0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | W | 17-10 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Marshall | 20 | 55.5 | 43 | | 39 | 55 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +1.5 / -19.5 | -18.5 / +9.5 |
| James Madison | 34 | -14.5 | 26(3) | -20 | 27 | 37 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +45.5 / +19.5 | -26.5 / -2 |
Marshall has been a thorn in the Dukes' side in recent years. Since becoming conference foes in the Sun Belt in 2022, the Herd are 3-1 against the spread against James Madison with a pair of outright upset victories. JMU earned a 35-23 road win at Marshall last season, but the Herd out-gained the Dukes in that contest as a double-digit 'dog. Marshall has won its last three games since getting shut-out at Penn State in the opener, but the Herd were fortunate to escape FCS-level Gardner-Webb last week. Marshall trailed by eight in the fourth quarter before eventually kicking the game-winning field goal with three seconds left. Carlos Del Rio-Wilson threw for nearly 400 yards against the Runnin' Bulldogs, but he was sacked four times last week. We'll be watching closely to see what JMU head coach Billy Napier does at quarterback in this game and moving forward. JC Evans is expected to be cleared this week after suffering a wrist injury that forced him to miss the last three games. But Richmond transfer Camden Coleman is completing over 62-percent of his passes with eight touchdowns and just one interception in Evans' absence. Does Napier ride the hot hand of Coleman, or hand the reins back to Evans who won the job coming out of fall camp? Things have not gone smoothly for Marshall thus far, but asking JMU to cover a 19-point spread while still answering questions at quarterback is a tall task. Don't forget, James Madison also had a cross-country flight two weeks ago after traveling to San Diego State.
Play Marshall
09/28 11:10 AM PDT — Dukes' starting quarterback JC Evans is expected to be cleared this week after suffering a wrist injury that forced him to miss the last three games. But Richmond transfer Camden Coleman is completing over 62-percent of his passes with eight touchdowns and just one interception in Evans' absence.
| Marshall | 31.3 / 28.3 | +3 | 39 | 50 | -13.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| James Madison | 53 / 12 | +41 | 27 | 40 | -17 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Marshall | 09-26 | Gardner W. | -25 | 56 | 36-35 | James Madison | 09-26 | @ Old Domin. | -7 | 44 | 46-20 |
| | 09-19 | @ Missouri . | -4 | 52.5 | 30-24 | | 09-19 | @ San Diego. | +3 | 46.5 | 26-13 |
| | 09-12 | Middle Te. | -11.5 | 56 | 28-26 | | 09-12 | Wagner | -46.5 | 56.5 | 87-3 |
|
| 11-08-25 | James Madison | 35 | -13.5 | 20 | 35/139 | 14/24/1/270 | 0/0 |
| Marshall | 23 | 53.5 | 25 | 50/248 | 17/36/0/166 | 0/0 |
| 11-30-24 | Marshall | 35 | 52 | 17 | 38/141 | 13/25/0/120 | 2/1 |
| James Madison | 33 | -4 | 22 | 53/244 | 14/19/1/138 | 2/0 |
| Marshall |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Penn State | 23 | L | 0-45 | UN | 53.5 | 7 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Middle Tenn St | -11.5 | L | 28-26 | UN | 56 | -5.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | L | 14-13 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri State | -4 | W | 30-24 | OV | 52.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Gardner Webb | -25 | L | 36-35 | OV | 56 | | L | 10-14 | OV | | | W | 27-21 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| James Madison |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Liberty | -6 | W | 20-13 | UN | 51 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wagner | -46.5 | W | 87-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 42-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Diego State | 3 | W | 26-13 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 19-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Old Dominion | -7 | W | 46-20 | OV | 44 | -0.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | W | 30-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Notre Dame | 31 | -21 | 2.5 | -18.5 | 3 | 27 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | +34.5 / +39 | -37 / -27 |
| North Carolina | 13 | 46.5 | 23(2) | | 24 | 20 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +32 / -8 | -36.5 / +3 |
Notre Dame has won-and-covered each of the last four meetings, with the last one being a 45-32 road win in Chapel Hill in September 2022. The Tar Heels are coming off a bye after previously falling at Clemson the week before. That early-season win over TCU has also lost a bit of luster as the Horned Frogs just lost to UCF with a back-up quarterback. Notre Dame has out-scored its first four opponents by a combined margin of 169-33. While the level of competition hasn't been stellar, the Irish have played three Big Ten teams (which is more than what a lot of other teams around the country can say in the strength of schedule discussion at the moment). The Irish have a home game against Stanford on the horizon next week, so there's no real fear about a look-ahead spot (that will potentially come up next week as Notre Dame has a trip to BYU on the horizon). We've mentioned this a handful of times through out the season thus far, and we'll bring it out once again: Notre Dame is in a much different place now than the Irish were in last season. Notre Dame opened the season with a pair of losses, which forced Marcus Freeman to keep his foot on the gas against Notre Dame's remaining ten opponents last season. That's not the case in 2026, and in fact, we'd argue that Freeman is playing quite conservatively with a big-picture look toward the College Football Playoff on his mind. Notre Dame has scored a defensive touchdown in three of its four games this season, which is helping to inflate their final scores. What would this total be if North Carolina didn't see a weather delay last against Clemson? Hypothetically, that game ends 20-12 or 20-18 without the weather issues, then we're looking at a North Carolina defense that held TCU to ten points in the opener then held Clemson to 12-18 points last week. We might be looking at Bill Belichick's defense a little differently under some Carolina Blue lenses. We believe his defense will be up to the task once again.
Play the Under
| Notre Dame | 42.7 / 6.7 | +36 | 3 | 31 | -33.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| North Carolina | 23.3 / 13.7 | +9.7 | 23 | 31 | -8.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Notre Dame | 09-26 | @ Purdue | -27 | 57 | 49-10 | North Carolina | 09-19 | @ Clemson | +3 | 44.5 | 20-28 |
| | 09-19 | Michigan . | -29 | 51.5 | 27-10 | | 09-12 | East Tenn. | -36.5 | 55 | 35-3 |
| | 09-12 | Rice | -44.5 | 54.5 | 52-0 | | 08-29 | @ TCU | +7.5 | 46.5 | 15-10 |
| Notre Dame |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Wisconsin | -21.5 | W | 41-13 | OV | 46 | -6.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Rice | -44.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 54.5 | -13.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -26.5 | W | 42-0 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Michigan State | -29 | L | 27-10 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -17.5 | L | 17-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Purdue | -27 | W | 49-10 | OV | 57 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -16.5 | W | 35-0 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ TCU | 7.5 | W | 15-10 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | W | 12-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | East Tennessee State | -36.5 | L | 35-3 | UN | 55 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Clemson | 3 | L | 20-28 | OV | 44.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 7.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-6 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/29 11:11 pm |
| Auburn | 24 | 54 | 18 | | 17 | 18 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | +12 / - | -13 / - |
| Tennessee U | 27 | -6 | 12(3) | -9 | 12 | 4 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 1-0 | 0-3 / 1-0 | +25.7 / +21 | -26.5 / -12.5 |
This is the first meeting between the Vols and Tigers since Auburn's 30-17 home win in November 2020. War Eagle rebounded nicely after falling at home to Florida, handling business last week against Vanderbilt. Byrum Brown went 18-of-27 through the air and added a touchdown on the ground as this group of transfers from South Florida adjusts to life in the SEC. Tennessee is hoping for a bounce-back performance of its own after falling at home to Texas last week. The Volunteers' defense was largely up for the challenge, but Tennessee's offense couldn't get much going. Freshman QB Faizon Brandon was pressured all afternoon as the Longhorns generated ten sacks in Knoxville, briefly knocking Brandon out of the game at one point. We haven't seen enough from the Vols offense to feel comfortable laying this kind of price with Tennessee right now. Yes, the Vols beat Georgia Tech by 21 earlier this season, but the Jackets threw two interceptions and one was returned for a touchdown. In that contest, Brandon went 10-of-21 through the air for 148 passing yards. That's not going to be enough to cover spreads like this in the SEC. This is Auburn's first road test of the season, but Brown is a fifth-year senior that has already played at Florida, Miami and Alabama during his lengthy career with the Bulls and Tigers. He knows how to prepare for an environment like the one he will see in Knoxville.
Play Auburn
| Auburn | 34.3 / 22.3 | +12 | 16 | 26 | -13 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Tennessee U | 34.7 / 17.7 | +17 | 12 | 23 | -14 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Auburn | 09-26 | Vanderbilt | -10 | 54.5 | 21-15 | Tennessee U | 09-26 | Texas | +5 | 54.5 | 17-20 |
| | 09-19 | Florida | +2.5 | 53.5 | 39-44 | | 09-19 | Kennesaw . | -35 | 60 | 42-9 |
| | 09-12 | So Missis. | -32 | 56.5 | 43-8 | | 09-12 | @ Georgia T. | -12.5 | 55.5 | 45-24 |
| Auburn |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Baylor | -6.5 | L | 17-16 | UN | 58.5 | -1.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | So Mississippi | -32 | W | 43-8 | UN | 56.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 27-8 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida | 2.5 | L | 39-44 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Vanderbilt | -10 | L | 21-15 | UN | 54.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Samford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tennessee U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Furman | -49.5 | L | 56-9 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Georgia Tech | -12.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 55.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13 | -6.5 | W | 24-10 | OV | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Kennesaw State | -35 | L | 42-9 | UN | 60 | -9.5 | W | 15-3 | OV | 14.5 | -21.5 | L | 21-3 | UN | 34 |
| 09-26-26 | Texas | 5 | W | 17-20 | UN | 54.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | L | 3-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tech Play | | Updated: 09/29 6:06 pm |
| Navy | 17 | 45.5 | 33 | -2 | 30 | 42 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +27 / -6 | -31.5 / -5.5 |
| Air Force | 24 | -2.5 | 38(3) | | 35 | 41 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +14 / +3 | -15 / -4.5 |
Word from the Pentagon is that Navy might have some problems hanging onto the Commander-in-Chief’s Trophy for a third straight season if it can’t get QB Braxton Woodson (out recently with an ankle sprain) back to active duty. Though Woodson entered 2026 with limited work in the past, he was Brian Newberry’s preferred choice to run Drew Cronic’s unique option-with-Wing T elements because of his explosive running ability, which were on display in early games vs. Towson and Florida Atlantic when Woodson would rank among the nation’s rush leaders with 296 yards and four TDs after just two weeks. Granted, backup Jackson Gutierrez has also displayed some pop, but last week’s loss at UAB was more than a bit sobering especially as the Midshipmen were uncharacteristically sloppy when losing two fumbles in Birmingham. Meanwhile, Troy Calhoun’s corresponding option at Air Force seems to be running at peak efficiency (interestingly also on 1,001 rushing yards, as is Navy, after three games) with a more-experienced pilot in Liam Szarka, who punished Nevada with 171 rushing yards in last week’s exciting OT win in Reno. Service academy rivalries usually prompt us to consider looking “under” (48-14-1 the past 21 years!) as the dueling options often keep the chains and clock moving, and on the average about 15-20 fewer plays from scrimmage than most other FBS, non-dueling option battles. Though the Navy-Air Force rivalry has been a little more lively than the other recent matchups involving Army, as the case last year’ in the Mids’ 34-31 win at Annapolis. Note that Szarka dazzled in that clash in one of his earliest starts, accounting for 364 yards and all four Falcon TDs (two rushing, two passing). If there’s an advantage either way at the remodeled Falcon Stadium, it’s probably him, even if Woodson returns to active duty this week for the Mids, though as usual our first reaction is to look "under" in Commander-in-Chief battles.
Play the Under
10/01 7:33 AM PDT — Navy QB Braxton Woodson is expected to play for the Midshipmen this week.
| Navy | 30.7 / 25.7 | +5 | 29 | 45 | -14 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Air Force | 34 / 23.7 | +10.3 | 33 | 42 | -11.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Navy | 09-25 | @ UAB | -6.5 | 50 | 20-24 | Air Force | 09-26 | @ Nevada | -4.5 | 50.5 | 36-33 |
| | 09-12 | @ Florida A. | -4.5 | 59.5 | 30-38 | | 09-12 | North Dak. | +2 | 48.5 | 32-38 |
| | 09-05 | Towson | -31.5 | 50.5 | 42-15 | | 09-05 | Duquesne | -31.5 | 55.5 | 34-0 |
|
| 10-04-25 | Air Force | 31 | 51 | 23 | 45/211 | 12/20/0/249 | 1/1 |
| Navy | 34 | -13 | 18 | 29/178 | 20/26/0/339 | 2/1 |
| 10-05-24 | Navy | 34 | -9.5 | 21 | 49/329 | 9/15/0/134 | 0/0 |
| Air Force | 7 | 37 | 14 | 47/159 | 5/9/1/115 | 2/0 |
| Navy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Towson | -31.5 | L | 42-15 | OV | 50.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-12 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | -4.5 | L | 30-38 | OV | 59.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | -3 | L | 7-31 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ UAB | -6.5 | L | 20-24 | UN | 50 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 13-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Air Force |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Duquesne | -31.5 | W | 34-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 20-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | North Dakota State | 2 | L | 32-38 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 13-28 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Nevada | -4.5 | L | 36-33 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Central Florida | 24 | 50 | 27 | | 27 | 19 | 3-0 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 0-1 | +29.7 / -5 | -19 / +7 |
| Houston U | 38 | -10 | 17(2) | -12 | 18 | 40 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 2-0 | +42 / +6 | -36.5 / -4.5 |
Houston earned a 30-27 road win at UCF last season to break the Knights' three-game winning streak in this series. That 57-point final score was a little flattering for both offenses as there were two interceptions returned for touchdowns to inflate scoring. Houston out-gained UCF by 151 yards and held a 26-14 advantage in first downs, but the Cougars turned the ball over four times. Both teams are coming off wins last week as Houston took care of business in a tricky road spot at Georgia Southern, while UCF earned a small upset win over TCU. Knights’ quarterback Alonza Barnett will remain out of the lineup as he recovers from a hamstring injury. Florida International transfer Keyone Jenkins went 19-of-20 through the air with one touchdown and no interceptions in last week's win over the Horned Frogs. UCF's games have been very Jekyll-and-Hyde this season with two contests against Bethune Cookman and Georgia State that easily eclipsed 70 points, along with two contests against Pitt and TCU where scoring was optional. Even though last year's contest provided some fool's gold, we're inclined to look for points in this matchup. Houston's defense may not be where Willie Fritz would like at the moment, but the Cougars have a strong offense with Conner Weigman at the helm. If Jenkins does go in place of Barnett, we're not expecting to see much of a drop-off between those two quarterbacks. Both are experienced. Both know how to run an offense. All four of Houston's games have gone over the total thus far.
Play the Over
09/28 3:06 PM PDT — UCF quarterback Alonza Barnett will remain out of the lineup as he recovers from a hamstring injury. Florida International transfer Keyone Jenkins went 19-of-20 through the air with one touchdown and no interceptions in last week's win over TCU.
| Central Florida | 24 / 18.3 | +5.7 | 27 | 28 | -2.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Houston U | 48.3 / 20.7 | +27.7 | 18 | 34 | -20.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Central Florida | 09-26 | TCU | +3.5 | 48 | 21-13 | Houston U | 09-26 | @ Georgia S. | -17 | 56.5 | 42-28 |
| | 09-19 | Georgia S. | -17.5 | 50.5 | 44-30 | | 09-18 | @ Texas Tech | +8 | 52.5 | 26-28 |
| | 09-12 | @ Pittsburg. | +7 | 55 | 7-12 | | 09-12 | Southern | -52 | 61.5 | 77-6 |
|
| 11-07-25 | Houston U | 30 | 47.5 | 26 | 49/210 | 20/31/3/223 | 3/1 |
| Central Florida | 27 | -1 | 14 | 30/146 | 15/30/2/136 | 1/0 |
| Central Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-1-1 |
| 09-03-26 | Bethune Cookman | -43.5 | W | 73-6 | OV | 58.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 38-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 7 | W | 7-12 | UN | 55 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 13 | 4.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia State | -17.5 | L | 44-30 | OV | 50.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 20-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | TCU | 3.5 | W | 21-13 | UN | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2 | W | 14-10 | P | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Houston U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Oregon State | -21 | L | 33-20 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 9-7 | OV | 10.5 | -12.5 | L | 19-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern | -52 | W | 77-6 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 49-0 | OV | |
| 09-18-26 | @ Texas Tech | 8 | W | 26-28 | OV | 52.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 17-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia Southern | -17 | L | 42-28 | OV | 56.5 | -4.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -10 | W | 28-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan | 27 | -6.5 | 14.5 | -2.5 | 13 | 17 | 3-1 / 0-0 | 2-2 / 0-0 | 1-3 / 0-0 | +10.5 / - | -15.5 / - |
| Minnesota U | 19 | 42 | 19(2) | | 20 | 16 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 1-0 | +20.3 / +3 | -21.5 / +12 |
Michigan has won each of the last five meetings, but Minnesota did stay within the number as a double-digit 'dog in Ann Arbor in their last contest in 2024. Minnesota out-gained Michigan by 55 yards and held a 20-15 advantage in first downs in that contest. Fans of the maize-and-blue saw college football karma at its best/worst last week against Iowa. In a season where Michigan should have lost to Western Michigan in the opener and struggled with UTEP for way longer than it should have, the Wolverines suffered a loss in their best-played game of the season. Michigan out-gained Iowa by 144 yards and held a +1.5 yards per play advantage over the Hawkeyes, yet lost on the last play of the game as Hank Brown found Reece Vander Zee in the end zone with zeroes on the clock. The loss certainly hurt, but in the grand scheme of things, Kyle Whittingham's team still has plenty to play for. That Week 2 win over Oklahoma gave the maize-and-blue a little extra cushion to work with. Michigan has a bye after this contest, so Whittingham will undoubtedly ask his team for a solid effort this week before their break. Between the second half against UTEP and the 60 minutes against Iowa, the Wolverines played six quarters of quality football even though they don't have much to show for it. Minnesota was bullied against Mississippi State in Week 2, and while Michigan might not have quite the same speed as the Bulldogs, the Wolverines have enough talent to win this game with room to spare if they play like they have over the last six quarters.
Play Michigan
| Michigan | 29.3 / 15.7 | +13.7 | 12 | 24 | -11.5 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Minnesota U | 27 / 23 | +4 | 21 | 29 | -3 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Michigan | 09-26 | Iowa | -4.5 | 40 | 19-20 | Minnesota U | 09-26 | @ Washingto. | +12 | 45 | 27-24 |
| | 09-19 | UTEP | -34.5 | 48.5 | 52-17 | | 09-19 | Akron | -22.5 | 48.5 | 41-7 |
| | 09-12 | Oklahoma | +5 | 43.5 | 17-10 | | 09-12 | Mississip. | +1 | 53.5 | 13-38 |
| Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Michigan | -27.5 | L | 13-12 | UN | 50.5 | -7 | L | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -16.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Oklahoma | 5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 10-0 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UTEP | -34.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 48.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -20 | L | 17-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Iowa | -4.5 | L | 19-20 | UN | 40 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 7.5 | -2 | W | 10-7 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Minnesota U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Eastern Illinois | -42.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 52.5 | 0 | W | 14-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 35-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Mississippi St | 1 | L | 13-38 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | L | 6-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Akron | -22.5 | W | 41-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington U | 12 | W | 27-24 | OV | 45 | 2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 23 |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Middle Tenn St | 13 | 51 | 48 | | 48 | 37 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 0-2 | +15.5 / -6 | -9.5 / +9.5 |
| Kansas | 38 | -21.5 | 24(2) | -26 | 25 | 22 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | +14 / - | -20 / - |
Kansas returns to the field after a bye following the Jayhawks' trek to London. Kansas is still searching for its first win over an FBS-level opponent this season. Middle Tennessee's five-game point spread winning streak came to a close last week as the Raiders fell to Jacksonville State. MTSU's first four games have all stayed under the total. Kansas out-gained Arizona State 414-228 and held a 22-13 edge in first downs, but couldn't overcome a -3 turnover differential. Normally we wouldn't be too interested in this non-conference game in early October that is sandwiched around league games, but Kansas really needs to kick things into another gear with Isaiah Marshall at the helm. The Jayhawks' next two games are at Utah and at Kansas State. Marshall needs to show some notable improvement if he's going to lead Kansas through this Big XII slate. Lance Leipold normally isn't the type of coach to keep his foot on the gas as a three-touchdown favorite, but his squad needs to build some confidence before heading to Salt Lake City and Manhattan. Middle Tennessee has a quasi bye week after this game as the Conference USA schedule shifts toward more weekday games. Derek Mason may have his hands full with keeping his team focused this week. And although all officials are supposed to be completely unbiased, unbothered and neutral as can be, Mason can't expect to get the benefit of doubt too often over the next few weeks after the tirade he went on this week. Mason had to be reprimanded after filing 17 different reports with Conference USA over fouls that he felt were missed last week against the Gamecocks. Coach Mason probably won't be getting too many favors in that department anytime soon.
Play Kansas
| Middle Tenn St | 22 / 23.7 | -1.7 | 48 | 38 | +7.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Kansas | 29.7 / 22.7 | +7 | 25 | 31 | -11.5 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 |
| Middle Tenn St | 09-26 | @ Jacksonvi. | +7 | 50.5 | 13-23 | Kansas | 09-19 | Arizona S. | +5.5 | 50.5 | 17-24 |
| | 09-19 | Nevada | +3.5 | 50.5 | 27-20 | | 09-11 | Missouri | +4.5 | 51.5 | 21-38 |
| | 09-12 | @ Marshall | +11.5 | 56 | 26-28 | | 09-04 | Long Isla. | -44.5 | 57 | 51-6 |
| Middle Tenn St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Murray State | -22.5 | W | 38-14 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Marshall | 11.5 | W | 26-28 | UN | 56 | 5.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | W | 13-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Nevada | 3.5 | W | 27-20 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 7 | L | 13-23 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-13-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-1-1 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Long Island University | -44.5 | W | 51-6 | P | 57 | | W | 6-0 | OV | | | W | 30-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | Missouri | 4.5 | L | 21-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | W | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Arizona State | 5.5 | L | 17-24 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | PK | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tex San Antonio | 34 | -11.5 | 28 | -15 | 28 | 36 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-0-1 / 2-0 | 2-0 / 0-2 | +21.5 / -9.5 | -21 / +16 |
| Rice | 20 | 56 | 44(1) | | 44 | 29 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +10.5 / -33 | -7.5 / +28.5 |
The home team has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings in this Lone Star State battle. Rice earned a small upset as a home 'dog in 2024, and the RoadRunners got their revenge with a 61-13 home win in San Antonio last year. The Owls are still searching for their first win over an FBS-level foe after falling at Fresno State last week. UTSA won a back-and-forth slugfest with Colorado State in a game that featured 104 points, 1,042 yards and 150 total plays. We hope the RoadRunners had fun in that one because Rice will do everything it can to prevent that kind of pace in this one. We have this game lined above two touchdowns, so we're inclined to back UTSA as a road favorite. Under normal circumstances, this would probably be one of our favorite plays on this week's card, but this spot on UTSA's schedule gives us some pause. The RoadRunners were just involved in three-straight wild affairs, including a pair of high-scoring shootouts with Colorado State and Texas State sandwiched around a big-brother game against Texas. Asking the RoadRunners to maintain their pace and intensity for a fourth-straight week has been an issue for this team in the past. Also, UTSA hosts South Florida next Thursday, so the RoadRunners have a short week on the horizon against a quality foe. Suddenly, we see why this point spread has dropped from where we would project it should be.
| Tex San Antonio | 32 / 33.7 | -1.7 | 28 | 24 | +6 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Rice | 15 / 39.3 | -24.3 | 45 | 22 | +21.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Tex San Antonio | 09-26 | Colorado . | -14 | 56.5 | 59-45 | Rice | 09-26 | @ Fresno St. | +12 | 43 | 24-38 |
| | 09-19 | @ Texas | +30 | 58.5 | 6-30 | | 09-19 | Western M. | +7.5 | 43.5 | 21-28 |
| | 09-12 | @ Texas Sta. | +1.5 | 65.5 | 31-26 | | 09-12 | @ Notre Dame | +44.5 | 54.5 | 0-52 |
|
| 10-11-25 | Rice | 13 | 48.5 | 12 | 50/190 | 10/19/1/79 | 3/1 |
| Tex San Antonio | 61 | -9 | 21 | 34/191 | 16/25/0/246 | 1/0 |
| 10-12-24 | Tex San Antonio | 27 | -3.5 | 22 | 35/138 | 28/43/0/256 | 2/1 |
| Rice | 29 | 51 | 21 | 21/42 | 25/39/0/347 | 1/1 |
| Tex San Antonio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-0-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UT Rio Grande Valley | -28 | W | 45-16 | OV | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas State | 1.5 | W | 31-26 | UN | 65.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 14 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas | 30 | W | 6-30 | UN | 58.5 | 7.5 | W | 3-10 | UN | 13.5 | 18 | W | 3-20 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado State | -14 | PK | 59-45 | OV | 56.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | W | 35-21 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rice |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Houston Baptist | -22.5 | W | 31-3 | UN | 47.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Notre Dame | 44.5 | L | 0-52 | UN | 54.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14 | 26.5 | L | 0-42 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Western Michigan | 7.5 | W | 21-28 | OV | 43.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Fresno State | 12 | L | 24-38 | OV | 43 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Akron | 17 | 47.5 | 53.5 | | 52 | 30 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +3.5 / -28 | -7 / +25.5 |
| Central Michigan | 27 | -6.5 | 45(1) | -9.5 | 44 | 5 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 1-1 | +8.5 / -40 | -8.5 / +26 |
Akron has covered the number in each of the last three meetings, including a 28-22 upset win as a 7.5-point home 'dog last season. The Zips out-gained the Chipps 417-374 in that contest as Jordan Grant ran for 176 yards. Both teams are licking their wounds after suffering tough losses to superior opponents last week. Central Michigan fell 52-3 at Miami (Fla) while Akron was blown out at home against UNLV. Laying points with Central Michigan is tough, but we have this game lined above a touchdown. Like we just mentioned, Central Michigan closed as a 7.5-point road favorite in Akron last year, and now the Chipps are only being asked to lay 6.5 at home. Neither team has done much this season, but Central Michigan's 14-point win over Wyoming looks a little better after the Cowboys beat Hawaii last week.
Play Central Michigan
| Akron | 20.7 / 29.7 | -9 | 52 | 36 | +3 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Central Michigan | 13.3 / 24 | -10.7 | 45 | 34 | +8 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Akron | 09-26 | UNLV | +13 | 53 | 10-38 | Central Michigan | 09-26 | @ Miami Flo. | +41 | 52 | 3-52 |
| | 09-19 | @ Minnesota. | +22.5 | 48.5 | 7-41 | | 09-19 | Wyoming | +1.5 | 40 | 24-10 |
| | 09-12 | Robert Mo. | -26.5 | 45.5 | 45-10 | | 09-12 | Colgate | -18.5 | 49.5 | 13-10 |
|
| 10-04-25 | Central Michigan | 22 | -7 | 20 | 40/238 | 14/24/0/136 | 1/0 |
| Akron | 28 | 47 | 20 | 35/167 | 20/31/1/255 | 0/0 |
| Akron |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | 28 | W | 16-38 | OV | 50.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Robert Morris | -26.5 | W | 45-10 | OV | 45.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Minnesota U | 22.5 | L | 7-41 | UN | 48.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | UNLV | 13 | L | 10-38 | UN | 53 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | W | 10-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Central Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ New Mexico | 11 | L | 7-38 | UN | 47.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Colgate | -18.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 49.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 0-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Wyoming | 1.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 40 | 0 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 19.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Florida | 41 | L | 3-52 | OV | 52 | 10.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 24 | L | 3-35 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan State | 13 | 43.5 | 26 | | 23 | 16 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 1-1-1 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 0-1 | +6.7 / -17 | -7.5 / +29 |
| Wisconsin | 23 | -8.5 | 18(3) | -11 | 20 | 12 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +35.5 / +4 | -33.5 / +9.5 |
This is the first meeting between the Spartans and Badgers since Michigan State earned a home win in overtime in October 2022. Wisconsin earns this week's title as "team no one knows what to do with." The Badgers finally got a signature win for head coach Luke Fickell in Happy Valley, but how much of that credit should go toward Wisconsin and how much blame should go toward Penn State? Wisconsin QB Colton Joseph went 18-for-38 through the air with three interceptions. If you remove Joseph's 72-yard pass to tight end Jacob Harris which featured quite a bit of contact and probably coulda-shoulda-would been called for offensive pass interference, Joseph's other 37 pass attempts produced an average of 4.4 yards per attempt. That's...not good at all. Wisconsin was also penalized nine times as the Badgers struggled to handle the Beaver Stadium environment. So we're not sure how much to upgrade Wisconsin after last week, and frankly, we might not learn a whole lot this week because the Spartans' roster is falling apart. Michigan State running back Cam Edwards will miss the rest of the season after suffering a knee injury last week against Nebraska. Edwards had three rushing touchdowns for the Spartans this season after starting his college journey with nearly 2,700 rushing yards at UConn. We can only look toward the under in this contest. Michigan State's four games have seen an average of 43.3 points. Fourteen of Penn State's 20 points last week came directly off turnovers. If this game maintains a traditional game state, we struggle to see how either team is going to put crooked numbers on the board.
Play the Under
09/28 10:35 AM PDT — Michigan State running back Cam Edwards will miss the rest of the season after suffering a knee injury last week against Nebraska. Edwards had three rushing touchdowns for the Spartans this season after starting his college journey with nearly 2,700 rushing yards at UConn.
| Michigan State | 19.3 / 21.7 | -2.3 | 22 | 21 | +5.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Wisconsin | 38 / 13 | +25 | 21 | 37 | -19 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Michigan State | 09-26 | Nebraska | +5.5 | 49 | 13-31 | Wisconsin | 09-26 | @ Penn State | +9.5 | 44 | 24-20 |
| | 09-19 | @ Notre Dame | +29 | 51.5 | 10-27 | | 09-19 | Eastern M. | -23.5 | 44 | 54-10 |
| | 09-12 | Eastern M. | -17.5 | 49.5 | 35-7 | | 09-12 | Western I. | -43 | 53 | 36-9 |
| Michigan State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-2-1 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Toledo | -10 | PK | 30-20 | OV | 48.5 | -3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -6.5 | W | 19-7 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Eastern Michigan | -17.5 | W | 35-7 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 26 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Notre Dame | 29 | W | 10-27 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 17.5 | W | 10-17 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Nebraska | 5.5 | L | 13-31 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3 | L | 10-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wisconsin |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-1-1 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Notre Dame | 21.5 | L | 13-41 | OV | 46 | 6.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Illinois | -43 | L | 36-9 | UN | 53 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 23-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Eastern Michigan | -23.5 | W | 54-10 | OV | 44 | -6.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Penn State | 9.5 | W | 24-20 | P | 44 | 2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 6 | L | 7-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Purdue | 31 | 62 | 27 | | 27 | 3 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 3-0 / 1-0 | -5.3 / -14 | -2 / +13.5 |
| Illinois | 38 | -9 | 19.5(2) | -9.5 | 18 | 4 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 1-0 | 3-0 / 1-0 | +17.7 / -23 | -22 / +26 |
Illinois has won each of the last two meetings, but the Boilermakers took the Illini to overtime as a three-touchdown 'dog in 2024. Each of the last four meetings have gone over the total. Well, we haven't seen any head coaches fired yet, but an early domino fell from the coordinator ranks this week as Illini defensive coordinator Bobby Hauck left the program four games into the job. Hauck, the former Montana head coach who arrived in Champaign in February, didn't feel like he was a good fit in Bret Bielema's staff. The results are hard to argue. In last week's 42-19 loss to Ohio State, the Illini only had nine defenders on the field for the Buckeyes' final touchdown. Bielema will have his hands full with fixing this defense, which has allowed an average of 32.0 points per game against UAB, Duke and Ohio State. Dating back to the end of last season, Purdue's last six games have all gone over the total. The Boilermakers' offense has been feisty this year, scoring 36 points against Wake Forest and 38 points against UCLA.
Play the Over
| Purdue | 28 / 46.3 | -18.3 | 27 | 15 | +14.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Illinois | 31.3 / 27.7 | +3.7 | 18 | 27 | -5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Purdue | 09-26 | Notre Dame | +27 | 57 | 10-49 | Illinois | 09-26 | @ Ohio State | +26 | 53.5 | 19-42 |
| | 09-19 | @ UCLA | +13.5 | 53 | 38-52 | | 09-19 | Southern . | -35 | 56.5 | 48-10 |
| | 09-12 | Wake Fore. | +2.5 | 51.5 | 36-38 | | 09-12 | Duke | -6 | 51.5 | 27-31 |
|
| 10-04-25 | Illinois | 43 | -7 | 22 | 41/117 | 19/22/0/390 | 0/0 |
| Purdue | 27 | 54.5 | 25 | 25/151 | 30/50/0/302 | 2/2 |
| 10-12-24 | Purdue | 49 | 47.5 | 21 | 32/239 | 18/26/0/297 | 0/0 |
| Illinois | 50 | -22.5 | 28 | 39/177 | 20/34/0/379 | 1/1 |
| Purdue |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Indiana State | -35 | L | 44-19 | OV | 56 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 16-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Wake Forest | 2.5 | W | 36-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 1 | L | 10-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ UCLA | 13.5 | L | 38-52 | OV | 53 | 4.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Notre Dame | 27 | L | 10-49 | OV | 57 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 16.5 | L | 0-35 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | UAB | -25.5 | L | 42-23 | OV | 54 | -7 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | L | 21-13 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Duke | -6 | L | 27-31 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Southern Illinois | -35 | W | 48-10 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Ohio State | 26 | W | 19-42 | OV | 53.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | L | 10-28 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UL Monroe | 20 | 56.5 | 51 | | 50 | 37 | 0-2 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 1-1 | -15.5 / -27.5 | +1.5 / +19 |
| South Alabama | 27 | -13 | 41.5(1) | -10.5 | 42 | 19 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 2-0 | +15 / -14 | -10.5 / +15.5 |
We'll keep this one pretty short and simple because most of the handicap revolves around the health of Jaguars' QB Bishop Davenport. He has missed South Alabama's last two games against Ohio and Kentucky with an undisclosed injury. Davenport is listed as questionable on the Jaguars' early-week injury report. If he is out one more week - we could only look in UL-Monroe's direction. The WarHawks are 0-4 straight-up, 1-3 against the spread this season but this would be a huge number for South Alabama to be laying with potentially a backup QB. South Alabama closed as a 4.5-point road favorite at Monroe last season, and now the Jaguars are potentially laying two touchdowns at home with a backup QB? That's a tough one. Not to mention, South Alabama is coming off a road trip to Kentucky last week where Big Blue ran for 390 rushing yards. We're thinking the Jaguars' defense might be a little sore after that.
Play UL-Monroe
10/01 7:37 AM PDT — South Alabama QB Bishop Davenport is expected to play in this contest. Davenport missed the Jaguars' last two games against Ohio and Kentucky with an undisclosed injury.
| UL Monroe | 24 / 36.3 | -12.3 | 49 | 44 | +4 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| South Alabama | 28.7 / 36.3 | -7.7 | 42 | 30 | +8 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| UL Monroe | 09-26 | Florida A. | +12 | 58 | 17-45 | South Alabama | 09-26 | @ Kentucky | +20.5 | 54.5 | 21-45 |
| | 09-19 | SE Louisi. | -9.5 | 48.5 | 35-38 | | 09-19 | Ohio | -7 | 49.5 | 41-36 |
| | 09-12 | @ UAB | +9 | 53.5 | 20-26 | | 09-12 | @ Tulane | +10 | 48 | 24-28 |
|
| 11-15-25 | South Alabama | 26 | -4 | 24 | 53/200 | 17/23/0/162 | 3/1 |
| UL Monroe | 14 | 49.5 | 9 | 24/72 | 10/19/1/82 | 0/0 |
| 10-26-24 | UL Monroe | 17 | 45 | 15 | 37/238 | 11/24/2/149 | 1/0 |
| South Alabama | 46 | -7 | 28 | 48/355 | 18/30/0/168 | 1/1 |
| UL Monroe |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-4 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-0-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Mississippi St | 28.5 | L | 13-62 | OV | 54.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 13.5 | 17 | L | 3-41 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ UAB | 9 | W | 20-26 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13 | 6 | W | 17-10 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | SE Louisiana | -9.5 | L | 35-38 | OV | 48.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | L | 13-24 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Florida Atlantic | 12 | L | 17-45 | OV | 58 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | L | 17-35 | OV | 29 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-1-1 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-0-1 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Louisiana | -13.5 | W | 39-14 | UN | 54 | | W | 19-7 | OV | | | W | 22-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Tulane | 10 | W | 24-28 | OV | 48 | 3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | 6.5 | W | 10-14 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | Ohio | -7 | L | 41-36 | OV | 49.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kentucky | 20.5 | L | 21-45 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Boston College | 24 | 55.5 | 33 | | 33 | 18 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 0-3 / 0-1 | +2 / -19 | -8.5 / +7 |
| SMU | 34 | -21.5 | 15.5(2) | -19.5 | 15 | 47 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 0-1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +28 / -3.5 | -31.5 / 0 |
SMU has won each of the last two meetings by double digits with both games going over their respective totals. The Mustangs struggled to get back in the win column after losing in Louisville the week prior. As a 30.5-point favorite over Missouri State last week, SMU didn't take its first lead of the game until there were four seconds remaining in the first half. The Mustangs only won by ten, despite QB Kevin Jennings going 33-of-39 for 464 passing yards with three touchdowns. Boston College put up a good fight against Virginia Tech in a nor'easter last week. The Eagles' first four games this season have all stayed under the total. Our power ratings are in line with where this game has opened, but we're inclined to take the points with Boston College. It was clear from pregame warmups that neither the Eagles nor the Hokies were going to be able to do much in 40 mph winds and driving rain last week. A win would have been nice, but Bill O'Brien has to overall be pleased with the way his team competed. And we were critical at the time because we thought it was a really bad loss, but Boston College's Week 1 defeat at Cincinnati has aged a little bit better as the Bearcats are off to a 4-0 start. O'Brien's playbook may have a few new wrinkles this week after the Eagles were forced into a vanilla script last week against Virginia Tech.
Play Boston College
| Boston College | 21.3 / 19.3 | +2 | 33 | 34 | -8.5 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 |
| SMU | 40.3 / 25 | +15.3 | 14 | 39 | -20 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Boston College | 09-26 | Virginia . | +14.5 | 45.5 | 14-21 | SMU | 09-26 | Missouri . | -30.5 | 59.5 | 34-24 |
| | 09-19 | Maine | -37.5 | 54.5 | 22-16 | | 09-19 | @ Louisville | +3 | 57.5 | 31-41 |
| | 09-11 | Rutgers | -3 | 53.5 | 28-21 | | 09-12 | UC Davis | -32.5 | 59 | 56-10 |
|
| 11-08-25 | SMU | 45 | -10.5 | 22 | 31/222 | 19/35/1/352 | 1/0 |
| Boston College | 13 | 54.5 | 25 | 40/106 | 29/45/2/284 | 2/2 |
| 11-16-24 | Boston College | 28 | 54.5 | 23 | 43/180 | 18/32/1/237 | 0/0 |
| SMU | 38 | -19 | 25 | 30/140 | 24/35/1/298 | 0/0 |
| Boston College |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-0-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Cincinnati U | 7 | L | 15-34 | UN | 51.5 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | L | 0-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Rutgers | -3 | W | 28-21 | UN | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Maine | -37.5 | L | 22-16 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 16-0 | OV | | | W | 19-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Virginia Tech | 14.5 | W | 14-21 | UN | 45.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| SMU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-1-1 |
| 09-07-26 | @ Florida State | -3 | PK | 27-24 | UN | 52.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -1.5 | W | 17-10 | P | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | UC Davis | -32.5 | W | 56-10 | OV | 59 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Louisville | 3 | L | 31-41 | OV | 57.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri State | -30.5 | L | 34-24 | UN | 59.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 14.5 | -19.5 | L | 14-10 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas Tech | 32 | -13.5 | 10 | -17 | 9 | 45 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 1-0 | +20 / +11 | -29 / -26 |
| Colorado | 14 | 50.5 | 30(3) | | 27 | 22 | 1-0 / 1-2 | 0-1 / 1-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | +31 / -14.3 | -38.5 / +6 |
We keep waiting for Texas Tech to flash some of that Earnie-Shavers-like KO power it routinely displayed a year ago, but unless you got a favorable number for last Saturday’s game vs. Sam Houston (the spread bobbed between 37.5 and 34.5 during the week), the Red Raiders are now working on five-straight games without a pointspread win since the Orange Bowl beatdown administered by Oregon. Even against the Bearkats last week, it took a rare back-to-back pick-sixes - on consecutive throws, no less - by linebacker Austin Romaine to get Tech off and running in Lubbock. While some wonder if things might have been different had Cincinnati transfer QB Brendan Sorsby not run afoul of the rules, Joey McGuire has had to fly with last year’s backup Will Hammond, who has looked a bit gun-shy off of knee surgery and has yet to impress with only four TD passes and five picks, three of the latter last week vs. Sam Houston. Will McGuire soon look to ex-BC and Florida State transfer Tommy Castellanos, with much-enhanced mobility and starting to take a few snaps in games after his late-summer transfer? Yet such is our distrust at the moment for Deion Sanders and his Colorado bunch that we consider the Buffs a less-desirable alternative, especially as the offense has only percolated vs. lower-tier Big Sky rep Weber State after scoring barely 11 points per game vs. three FBS foes in September. Fed up with the inability of QB Julian Lewis to get the ball downfield, Deion went to the bullpen last Saturday vs. Baylor and turned to ex-Utah pilot Isaac Wilson, who started much of 2024 with the Utes (without much great success, we might add) and at least began to wing the ball in the second half in Waco, though as the case for him at Utah not being especially accurate (only 12-of-25 vs. the Bears). Whether it be Lewis or Wilson taking snaps this week, the fact is that Deion has no more children to count upon to show up and play QB like son Shedeur a few years ago before moving to the NFL, with the Buffs struggling to find a suitable orchestrator since. Deion has also covered the spread only five times in his last 15 tries vs. FBS opposition, and rumblings from the Front Range suggest some trouble in Boulder after the recent dismissal of a handful of Buffs in the wake of the recent humbling loss at Northwestern. As much as we’re not enamored laying double digits with Texas Tech these days, we’re even less enamored with Colorado.
Play Texas Tech
| Texas Tech | 37.3 / 21.3 | +16 | 9 | 33 | -23 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Colorado | 24 / 28.3 | -4.3 | 25 | 33 | -9 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Texas Tech | 09-26 | Sam Houst. | -34.5 | 55.5 | 49-14 | Colorado | 09-26 | @ Baylor | +8 | 54.5 | 13-23 |
| | 09-18 | Houston U | -8 | 52.5 | 28-26 | | 09-19 | @ Northwest. | +3.5 | 48 | 7-41 |
| | 09-12 | @ Oregon St. | -26 | 52.5 | 35-24 | | 09-12 | Weber Sta. | -38.5 | 57.5 | 52-21 |
|
| 11-09-24 | Colorado | 41 | -4.5 | 22 | 26/64 | 30/43/0/291 | 0/0 |
| Texas Tech | 27 | 62 | 25 | 46/113 | 24/41/1/275 | 2/2 |
| Texas Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Abilene Christian | -45 | L | 33-10 | UN | 60.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Oregon State | -26 | L | 35-24 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -14.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-18-26 | Houston U | -8 | L | 28-26 | OV | 52.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 14-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Sam Houston St | -34.5 | W | 49-14 | OV | 55.5 | -7.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 21-14 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Colorado |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-2-1 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Georgia Tech | 6.5 | W | 14-13 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Weber State | -38.5 | L | 52-21 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 21-7 | OV | | | W | 42-14 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Northwestern | 3.5 | L | 7-41 | P | 48 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-21 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Baylor | 8 | L | 13-23 | UN | 54.5 | 2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 6 | L | 3-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UTEP | 8 | 47.5 | 49 | | 47 | 33 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +7.5 / -43 | -8 / +38 |
| New Mexico | 35 | -23.5 | 27(2) | -24 | 29 | 45 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +47 / +8 | -27 / +5 |
We suppose the simulcast race card at Sunland Park will have a few of its TVs tuned to football and this renewal of hostilities that hasn’t been conducted annually since the Lobos bolted the old WAC several conference adjustments ago in the late 90s. That's one good thing about the latest round of league shuffling with these regional rivals now back in the same loop (Mountain West), which means one shorter road trip for one or the other each year moving forward. The Miners, however, might have picked a bad year to resume riding up I-25 to Albuquerque as Jason Eck’s Lobos have dismantled every foe not named Oklahoma by a combined 150-32 in three games and stayed pretty close to the Sooners in Norman, too (losing only 14-6). The preseason injury to QB Jack Layne has turned into a non-event for New Mexico as Eck has been able to rotate better runner Toa Fa'avae (who took all of the snaps last week vs. NMSU in Las Cruces) and better passer Luke Moga without any noticeable dropoff. The Lobos have yet to toss a pick in four games and the infantry is banging out better than 200 yards per game on the ground while playing mistake-free football with no giveaways in four games. It’s defense, however, that they usually only see in Albuquerque at Kirtland Air Force Base, now making some noise as Eck’s stop unit is allowing only 252 yards per game and ranks 8th nationally in scoring defense at a mere 11.5 points per game. Not to mention, the Lobos are on pace for a +42 turnover margin (really!) if they can maintain their nation's-best pace (+14) from the first month. It's another tough assignment for UTEP, which has dealt with some harsh reality after waking up from the dream it actually led Michigan late in the first half at Ann Arbor before being out-scored 78-10 in a little more than six quarters since vs. the Wolverines and Oregon State. With QB EJ Colson not exactly mimicking a more famous Incarnate Word transfer, Cam Ward, and having trouble getting the ball downfield, the Miners are only scoring eight points per game vs. the three FBS foes already faced. It’s hard to put down UTEP for much more than that, considering how stingy Eck’s defensive platoon was in September, not to mention its voracious takeaway appetite.
Play the Under
| UTEP | 25 / 31.7 | -6.7 | 46 | 33 | +6.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| New Mexico | 39.3 / 13 | +26.3 | 29 | 36 | -11 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| UTEP | 09-26 | Oregon St. | +11 | 56 | 7-33 | New Mexico | 09-26 | @ New Mexic. | -11.5 | 47.5 | 42-18 |
| | 09-19 | @ Michigan | +34.5 | 48.5 | 17-52 | | 09-19 | @ Oklahoma | +21.5 | 45.5 | 6-14 |
| | 09-12 | Texas Sou. | -26.5 | 53 | 51-10 | | 09-12 | Mercyhurst | -42.5 | 54.5 | 70-7 |
| UTEP |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Oklahoma | 41 | L | 0-51 | UN | 51.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | OV | 12.5 | 24 | L | 0-27 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | Texas Southern | -26.5 | W | 51-10 | OV | 53 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Michigan | 34.5 | L | 17-52 | OV | 48.5 | 7.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 20 | W | 14-17 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon State | 11 | L | 7-33 | UN | 56 | 2.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Mexico |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Central Michigan | -11 | W | 38-7 | UN | 47.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Mercyhurst | -42.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 54.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Oklahoma | 21.5 | W | 6-14 | UN | 45.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 12.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | @ New Mexico State | -11.5 | W | 42-18 | OV | 47.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -7 | W | 14-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Baylor | 19 | 49.5 | 20 | -2 | 21 | 26 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | +22.7 / - | -22 / - |
| Arizona State | 28 | -3 | 24(2) | | 23 | 25 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +63 / -28 | -43.5 / +14.5 |
Big XII sources are thinking that Dave Aranda’s chances of hanging onto his job at Baylor are looking better every week as the Bears have thus far limited their stumbles to just one when coming an inch short (literally) in the opener vs. Auburn in Atlanta. With Florida transfer QB DJ Lagway back in the fold after missing the wins over Prairie View and Louisiana Tech, you would assume that Aranda’s prospects of job security would be looking better at the moment. Yet it’s that same Lagway who left a legion of doubters in Gainesville and now has his new Waco backers a bit unconvinced after a somewhat-tepid performance, going just 19-of-39 through the air last week vs Colorado. Add in the fact that the Baylor infantry is gaining only a pedestrian 3.7 yards per carry, and this doesn’t appear to be an offense that wants to get involved in any shootouts. Meanwhile, Kenny Dillingham’s Arizona State looks to have a bit sharper edge and should be well past any jet lag after returning from a successful trip to London two weeks ago when using big plays - including a 100-yard kickoff-return TD by Jaren Hamilton - to dump the Kansas Jayhawks at Wembley. That wasn’t the sharpest effort by ex-Kentucky QB Cutter Boley, who played like he was stuffed with bangers and mash from breakfast when passing for only 95 yards. But in North America, his numbers have been much better, including 641 passing yards and eight TDs in two starts. True, one of those starts was vs. outmanned MEAC rep Morgan State, but Boley also had Texas A&M back on its heels in College Station a few weeks ago before a couple of ill-advised picks in the fourth quarter at Kyle Field turned around that game the wrong way vs. the Aggies. Boley has, however, also found himself a couple of favorite new targets from the portal with ex-Colorado Omarion Miller and ex-Boston College Reed Harris combining for 39 catches in three games. Remember that Dillingham got the Bears on the road last year in the final seconds when Sam Leavitt was still in the Sun Devil fold while Aranda’s offense also had a bit more snap with gunslinger QB Sawyer Robertson. Even in the near-miss vs. Auburn, and especially last week vs. Deion's Colorado, Baylor has been a bit of a tough watch thus far...and this might be a time to trust the eye-test. Dillingham's Sun Devils are 9-3-1 vs. the spread at home in Tempe since the beginning of the 2024 campaign.
Play Arizona State
| Baylor | 34.3 / 11.7 | +22.7 | 22 | 39 | -22 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Arizona State | 38 / 24 | +14 | 22 | 29 | -11.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Baylor | 09-26 | Colorado | -8 | 54.5 | 23-13 | Arizona State | 09-19 | @ Kansas | -5.5 | 50.5 | 24-17 |
| | 09-19 | Louisiana. | -20.5 | 50.5 | 36-19 | | 09-12 | @ Texas A&M | +14.5 | 51.5 | 20-48 |
| | 09-12 | Prairie V. | -37.5 | 55.5 | 44-3 | | 09-05 | Morgan St. | -43.5 | 52.5 | 70-7 |
|
| 09-20-25 | Arizona State | 27 | 60.5 | 26 | 47/180 | 22/32/0/221 | 1/0 |
| Baylor | 24 | -2.5 | 18 | 23/107 | 25/39/1/250 | 2/2 |
| Baylor |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Auburn | 6.5 | W | 16-17 | UN | 58.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Prairie View A&M | -37.5 | W | 44-3 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 34-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Louisiana Tech | -20.5 | L | 36-19 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -11.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado | -8 | W | 23-13 | UN | 54.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6 | W | 10-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-0-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Morgan State | -43.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 28-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas A&M | 14.5 | L | 20-48 | OV | 51.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas | -5.5 | W | 24-17 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | PK | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Cincinnati U | 30 | 56.5 | 27 | | 26 | 17 | 4-0 / 0-0 | 3-1 / 0-0 | 3-1 / 0-0 | +20 / - | -13 / - |
| Arizona U | 33 | -7 | 19(2) | -10 | 18 | 35 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +26.5 / -0.5 | -34 / -2.5 |
They’re flying well under the radar out of CVG, as Scott Satterfield’s Cincinnati Bearcats enter October as one of the nation’s more anonymous 4-0 teams. Maybe Cincinnati, however, just likes to keep things interesting, rallying from 28-7 down to collar nearby rival Miami-Ohio two weeks ago before hanging on vs. favored Kansas State last weekend at Nippert. Whatever the weekly script, Satterfield looks to have made a shrewd move in the offseason portal by bringing QB JC French IV from Georgia Southern up to the Queen City. Perhaps it was the lure of the cheese coneys at Skyline that sold French on the Bearcats, but he’s yet to throw a pick and has accounted for 12 TDs (six pass, six run) as Satterfield is pounding away with a run-first offense featuring not only French’s mobility but some chop-busting from transfer running backs in Gi’Bran Payne (via Notre Dame; 7.2 yards per carry) and Cole Tabb (via Stanford; a whopping 11.1 yards per carry and 6 TDs, three of those last week vs. K-State). It’s also not too early to start identifying some pointspread underachievers, and though Arizona only has one outright slip-up to date (thanks in part to some iffy calls from the refs) at high-ranked BYU, the ‘Cats have yet to cover a number in four tries this season, with the spread slump now five-straight dating to the Holiday Bowl loss vs. SMU last December. Arizona took an awfully long time to put away a rebuilding Washington State in Pullman last week, and Big XII sources wonder if Brent Brennan’s offense might be putting too much on the plate of senior QB Noah Fifita, who needed to pull four TD passes out of his hat last week in the Palouse. Arizona’s infantry diversion ranks well up the track in national rushing stats, generating only 130 yards per game (108th nationally) on the ground. As long as the Bearcats bring along some No-Doz with the late kickoff (8pm PT / 11pm ET), this one keeps night owls entertained until the wee hours back East.
Play the Over
| Cincinnati U | 42.7 / 22.3 | +20.3 | 26 | 36 | -15 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 |
| Arizona U | 31 / 23 | +8 | 18 | 32 | -13 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Cincinnati U | 09-26 | Kansas St. | +6 | 55 | 31-26 | Arizona U | 09-26 | @ Washingto. | -11 | 47 | 34-24 |
| | 09-19 | Miami Ohio | -14.5 | 51 | 35-31 | | 09-19 | No Illino. | -34.5 | 50 | 42-17 |
| | 09-12 | Western C. | -36.5 | 61.5 | 62-10 | | 09-12 | @ BYU | +6.5 | 48.5 | 17-28 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Arizona U | 30 | 56.5 | 24 | 42/181 | 23/31/0/294 | 0/0 |
| Cincinnati U | 24 | -5 | 14 | 29/190 | 15/28/2/154 | 0/0 |
| Cincinnati U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:0-2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Boston College | -7 | W | 34-15 | UN | 51.5 | -3 | PK | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 10-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Carolina | -36.5 | W | 62-10 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 28-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Miami Ohio | -14.5 | L | 35-31 | OV | 51 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10 | -7.5 | L | 7-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Kansas State | 6 | W | 31-26 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 3.5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northern Arizona | -33.5 | L | 35-7 | UN | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ BYU | 6.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 48.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | No Illinois | -34.5 | L | 42-17 | OV | 50 | -7.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington State | -11 | L | 34-24 | OV | 47 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Washington U | 32 | 57 | 18 | | 16 | 22 | 3-1 / 0-0 | 0-4 / 0-0 | 2-2 / 0-0 | +11.3 / - | -26.5 / - |
| USC | 34 | -7 | 13.5(2) | -6.5 | 11 | 6 | 3-1 / 1-0 | 1-3 / 0-1 | 3-1 / 1-0 | +15 / +7 | -21.5 / -21 |
The pressure is ratcheting upwards at USC for Lincoln Riley, who is beginning to be regarded as something of a snake-oil salesman by the Cardinal and Gold support base that has spared no cost providing Riley with the tools he needs, including a shiny new football facility, hefty NIL budget and a supposed state-of-the-art football GM in Chad Bowden who was hired away from Notre Dame last year. Instead, more of the same as the past few years, constantly falling short in the big games such as last week vs. Oregon, with the defense again wilting as was the case with Riley in many of his big games at previous stop Oklahoma, too. Working under a new athletic director (Jen Cohen, who has outwardly been very supportive) and a new school president since Riley’s agent Trent Armstrong pulled a fast one on the previous administrators and negotiated a huge, near nine-figure buyout into Riley’s contract, is causing the panic meter to overheat at Jefferson & Figueroa as many Troy backers are now secretly hoping Riley leaves town for another gig and leaves it up to Armstrong and Cohen to figure out the financial specifics. Moreover, the folly of bringing defensive coordinator Gary Patterson out of retirement to solve the stop-end woes is now being exposed as the Trojans haven’t been able to slow the Louisiana Ragin’ Cajuns, Rutgers or the Ducks (with backup QB Dylan Raiola) the past three weeks while allowing more than 35 points per game. Not good! The question this week is if this version of visiting Washington rates with some of the heavy hitters that have been beating USC regularly in recent years, as there was evidence from the off in September that these might not be the same Huskies as last season. The punishing infantry diversion of RB Jonah Coleman (now NFL Broncos) has been missed, and there are various reports from the Northwest that QB Demond Williams might have lost the connection to his teammates when dallying with LSU in the portal last winter, and eyes perhaps more on next April’s NFL Draft than the current season in Seattle. U-Dub, however, is one of those contenders that Riley has yet to beat while at USC as Riley’s Trojans are now 0-6 straight-up vs. Oregon, the Huskies and next week’s foe Penn State. Remember that Jedd Fisch outmaneuvered Riley two years ago with his decidedly-average first Huskies edition. Though last Saturday's 27-24 home loss to PJ Fleck’s Minnesota is the latest indicator that something is amiss this season in Seattle, Williams can still be a dynamic playmaker, and can we really trust Riley with another soft Trojan defense to win, much less lay near double-digits? USC is just 4-12 against the spread over the last 16 games since early last season, and linebacker Desman Stephens II is suspended for this game after the late hit that he delivered to Oregon QB Dante Moore last week.
Play the Over
09/28 11:01 AM PDT — USC linebacker Desman Stephens II is suspended for this game after the late hit that he delivered to Oregon QB Dante Moore last week.
| Washington U | 29.3 / 19 | +10.3 | 15 | 39 | -27.5 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| USC | 39.3 / 35.3 | +4 | 11 | 25 | -16 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Washington U | 09-26 | Minnesota. | -12 | 45 | 24-27 | USC | 09-26 | Oregon | +3.5 | 60.5 | 27-41 |
| | 09-19 | Eastern W. | -42.5 | 59 | 48-16 | | 09-19 | @ Rutgers | -21 | 58.5 | 42-35 |
| | 09-12 | Utah State | -28 | 55.5 | 16-14 | | 09-12 | Louisiana | -30.5 | 59 | 49-30 |
|
| 11-02-24 | USC | 21 | -2 | 26 | 29/166 | 30/50/3/293 | 1/0 |
| Washington U | 26 | 55 | 21 | 27/117 | 25/40/0/262 | 1/0 |
| Washington U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Washington State | -24 | L | 24-10 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -14 | L | 10-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Utah State | -28 | L | 16-14 | UN | 55.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -17 | L | 10-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Eastern Washington | -42.5 | L | 48-16 | OV | 59 | | W | 14-3 | OV | | | W | 31-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Minnesota U | -12 | L | 24-27 | OV | 45 | -2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 23 |
| 10-03-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| USC |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-1 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:0-4-1 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | San Jose State | -37 | L | 42-26 | OV | 61 | -10 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14 | -23.5 | W | 28-0 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | Fresno State | -22.5 | W | 39-0 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | PK | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 30-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Louisiana | -30.5 | L | 49-30 | OV | 59 | -7.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rutgers | -21 | L | 42-35 | OV | 58.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | L | 20-14 | OV | 31 |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon | 3.5 | L | 27-41 | OV | 60.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-13 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas | 23 | 51 | 25 | | 23 | 33 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 0-1 | +5.7 / -33 | -7.5 / +13.5 |
| Texas A&M | 31 | -13.5 | 13.5(3) | -14.5 | 11 | 9 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-1 | +22.7 / -29 | -23.5 / +8 |
Arkansas has covered the spread in seven of the last eight meetings, including a narrow 45-42 loss last year as a 7.5-point home 'dog. The Hogs out-gained the Aggies by 30 yards last year, but A&M was able to punch in touchdowns while Arkansas was forced to settle for a couple field goals. In the race to find their respective "bottoms," the Razorbacks may have already found theirs while the Aggies are wondering how much worse it can get. Arkansas found the win column last week, handling Tulsa with relative ease as a 6.5-point home favorite. After fans wore brown paper bags and staged protests at the beginning of the season, there's really only one direction for Arkansas' season to go because it can’t get much worse than Georgia running practice drills on the sidelines during a game against you. The Hogs may be catching the Aggies at the ideal time because Mike Elko's team suffered back-to-back losses to Kentucky and LSU, failing to cover the spread by a combined 47 points across those two games. The Marcel Reed experience in College Station delivered some highlight moments over the last two years, but unless Reed can call Tom Brady for a tutoring session, Coach Elko may need to move on from the dynamic QB. Reed's completion percentage has dropped from 62.1-percent (which isn't that good to begin with) last year to 55.4-percent this year. His average yards per attempt have dropped from 8.4 in 2025 to 5.7 through the first four games in 2026. We've already seen Arkansas at its bottom. There may still be room to go before the Aggies hit theirs.
Play Arkansas
| Arkansas | 20.3 / 31.3 | -11 | 24 | 17 | +10.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Texas A&M | 25 / 28.7 | -3.7 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Arkansas | 09-26 | Tulsa | -7 | 51 | 34-6 | Texas A&M | 09-26 | @ LSU | +8 | 52.5 | 6-35 |
| | 09-19 | Georgia | +24.5 | 54.5 | 17-45 | | 09-19 | Kentucky | -17 | 48.5 | 21-31 |
| | 09-12 | @ Utah | +13.5 | 55.5 | 10-43 | | 09-12 | Arizona S. | -14.5 | 51.5 | 48-20 |
|
| 10-18-25 | Texas A&M | 45 | -7.5 | 29 | 34/219 | 23/32/0/280 | 0/0 |
| Arkansas | 42 | 57.5 | 25 | 32/268 | 20/33/0/259 | 0/0 |
| Arkansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Alabama | -40.5 | L | 31-14 | UN | 63.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Utah | 13.5 | L | 10-43 | UN | 55.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | L | 3-29 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia | 24.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | L | 3-21 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Tulsa | -7 | W | 34-6 | UN | 51 | -2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 16-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas A&M |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Missouri State | -38.5 | W | 50-0 | UN | 53.5 | -10.5 | L | 9-0 | UN | 14 | -24.5 | L | 19-0 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona State | -14.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 51.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kentucky | -17 | L | 21-31 | OV | 48.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -9.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ LSU | 8 | L | 6-35 | UN | 52.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Citadel | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ohio State | 31 | -14.5 | 3 | -11.5 | 3 | 19 | 3-0 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 3-0 / 0-1 | +44 / -1 | -42.5 / +2 |
| Iowa | 10 | 46.5 | 17.5(3) | | 17 | 13 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 0-1 | +32.7 / +1 | -27.5 / +4.5 |
Ohio State has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings, with the last one being a 35-7 home win over the Hawkeyes in October 2024. We covered most of Iowa's game against Michigan already in our Michigan-Minnesota preview. Bottom line: The Hawkeyes were thoroughly out-played by the Wolverines, but in typical Iowa fashion, made just enough plays when the lights were the brightest to sneak out a win. Since the beginning of last season, the Hawkeyes are 6-0 against the spread as an underdog. If Kirk Ferentz is looking a little tired on the Iowa sidelines this week, it's likely because he stayed up past his bedtime thinking about Jeremiah Smith. The Buckeyes' star receiver caught 12 passes for 217 yards and four touchdowns last week against Illinois. We knew it was coming. The Illini knew it was coming. Everyone inside Ohio Stadium knew it was coming. But every time the Buckeyes entered the red zone, there was simply nothing Illinois could do to stop the inevitable touchdown connection between Smith and Julian Sayin. Even though they got the win, Iowa's defense can't be happy with last week's performance against the Wolverines. The Hawkeyes allowed JJ Buchanan and Andrew Marsh to combine for 236 receiving yards and two touchdowns on 19 targets. If Michigan's limited passing offense is able to generate that kind of success, then Smith looks primed for another big outing. Ferentz is a fantastic coach as an underdog, but this recent crop of Buckeyes have been immune to the horrors that Kinnick Stadium occasionally brings upon guests.
Play Ohio State
| Ohio State | 41.3 / 15.3 | +26 | 4 | 24 | -25.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Iowa | 30.3 / 10.7 | +19.7 | 17 | 32 | -15.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Ohio State | 09-26 | Illinois | -26 | 53.5 | 42-19 | Iowa | 09-26 | @ Michigan | +4.5 | 40 | 20-19 |
| | 09-19 | Kent State | -52 | 58.5 | 59-3 | | 09-19 | Northern . | -37.5 | 48.5 | 55-0 |
| | 09-12 | @ Texas | +2 | 50.5 | 23-24 | | 09-12 | Iowa State | -14 | 42.5 | 16-13 |
|
| 10-05-24 | Iowa | 7 | 45.5 | 10 | 27/116 | 15/21/1/110 | 4/0 |
| Ohio State | 35 | -17 | 21 | 40/203 | 21/25/1/209 | 2/0 |
| Ohio State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Ball State | -50 | W | 56-3 | OV | 55.5 | -13.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -28.5 | L | 28-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas | 2 | W | 23-24 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kent State | -52 | W | 59-3 | OV | 58.5 | -13.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14.5 | -31.5 | W | 35-0 | UN | 35.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Illinois | -26 | L | 42-19 | OV | 53.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | W | 28-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | No Illinois | -31 | W | 40-0 | UN | 44.5 | -7.5 | W | 20-0 | OV | 10 | -18.5 | W | 33-0 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Iowa State | -14 | L | 16-13 | UN | 42.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Northern Iowa | -37.5 | W | 55-0 | OV | 48.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Michigan | 4.5 | W | 20-19 | UN | 40 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 7.5 | 2 | L | 7-10 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| BYU | 24 | -5 | 15.5 | -3.5 | 14 | 36 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | +33.5 / +18 | -28.5 / -17.5 |
| TCU | 20 | 49 | 21(2) | | 19 | 28 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | +40 / -8 | -32 / -3.5 |
BYU is coming off an early-season bye week after opening the year 3-0 straight-up and against the spread. If given the opportunity to tweak the Cougars' schedule Kalani Sitake probably wishes that bye week would have come later in the season because BYU didn't break much of a sweat against Colorado State before the hiatus. TCU returns home after a disappointing loss at UCF last week. The Horned Frogs' three games against FBS-level competition have all stayed under their respective totals by an average of 17.8 points per game. Jeremy Payne was only able to generate 48 rushing yards on 15 attempts last week against the Knights. Harvard transfer Jaden Craig threw two interceptions as he continues a shaky climb from the FCS to the FBS ranks. Our power ratings are in line with where this game has opened, but we're inclined to look toward the under. BYU's defense held TCU to 13 points, 298 total yards and 15 first downs last season. The Horned Frogs went 1-for-10 on third down, and that was with Josh Hoover (now at Indiana) at quarterback. The QB play has taken a step back with Craig and the helm, but he's not getting much help from the surrounding cast. TCU will likely need to lean on its defense if the Horned Frogs want to pull the upset in Fort Worth on Saturday.
Play the Under
| BYU | 44 / 15.7 | +28.3 | 12 | 36 | -25 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| TCU | 35.7 / 11.7 | +24 | 19 | 41 | -22.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| BYU | 09-19 | @ Colorado . | -17.5 | 55 | 41-23 | TCU | 09-26 | @ Central F. | -3.5 | 48 | 13-21 |
| | 09-12 | Arizona U | -6.5 | 48.5 | 28-17 | | 09-19 | Arkansas . | -19 | 56.5 | 31-7 |
| | 09-05 | Dixie Sta. | -50.5 | 61.5 | 63-7 | | 09-12 | Grambling | -44.5 | 55.5 | 63-7 |
|
| 11-15-25 | TCU | 13 | 52 | 15 | 34/115 | 10/23/2/183 | 0/0 |
| BYU | 44 | -3 | 28 | 38/152 | 23/33/0/296 | 1/1 |
| BYU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Dixie State | -50.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona U | -6.5 | W | 28-17 | UN | 48.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Colorado State | -17.5 | W | 41-23 | OV | 55 | -4.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 11.5 | -9.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| TCU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:0-2-1 |
| 08-29-26 | North Carolina | -7.5 | L | 10-15 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | L | 10-12 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Grambling | -44.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Arkansas St | -19 | W | 31-7 | UN | 56.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Central Florida | -3.5 | L | 13-21 | UN | 48 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2 | L | 10-14 | P | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Alabama | 27 | -5.5 | 5 | -7 | 6 | 18 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 3-0 / 1-0 | +27.7 / +28 | -19 / -9 |
| Mississippi St | 24 | 63 | 15(3) | | 16 | 16 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +28 / +16 | -16 / +1.5 |
Alabama has won-and-covered each of the last six meetings, but these SEC foes have not taken the field since September 2023. Alabama head coach Kalen DeBoer caught some folks by surprise this week, announcing that the Crimson Tide were going to stay home all week and simply take a bus from Tuscaloosa to Starkville on Saturday morning. We assume that Alabama's traveling party will receive a cushioned escort along I-82, but you don't see too many teams preparing for an 11am CT kickoff like this in 2026. DeBoer knows his team and what makes them tick, but we're inclined to back the Bulldogs as a home 'dog in this one. Mississippi State is 4-0 straight-up and against the spread with two conference wins over South Carolina and Missouri. We have a common data point between these teams as both the Bulldogs and Tide whipped the Gamecocks over the past few weeks. When asking Alabama to cover a spread like this on the road in a tough environment, we simply want to see a little more consistency from the Tide. We certainly saw it last week against South Carolina, but prior to that, Alabama fell behind 21-6 against Florida State and trailed Kentucky for almost three full quarters before stepping on the gas in the final minutes. Since the midway point of the 2024 season, Mississippi State has gone 11-6 against the spread as an underdog. Alabama's Keelon Russell has been fantastic thus far, but we're still talking about a sophomore playing the seventh game of his college career and just his second road start. Winning by margin in that environment is not easy.
Play Mississippi State
| Alabama | 48 / 23.7 | +24.3 | 7 | 19 | -13 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Mississippi St | 36.7 / 23.7 | +13 | 17 | 17 | -0.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Alabama | 09-26 | South Car. | -11.5 | 53 | 49-18 | Mississippi St | 09-26 | Missouri | -3.5 | 58.5 | 31-24 |
| | 09-19 | Florida S. | -18 | 50.5 | 50-36 | | 09-19 | @ South Car. | +3.5 | 60 | 41-34 |
| | 09-12 | @ Kentucky | -9 | 47.5 | 45-17 | | 09-12 | @ Minnesota. | -1 | 53.5 | 38-13 |
| Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:4-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | East Carolina | -28 | W | 48-10 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -16.5 | W | 38-7 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kentucky | -9 | W | 45-17 | OV | 47.5 | -3 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -5.5 | L | 13-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida State | -18 | L | 50-36 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 26-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Carolina | -11.5 | W | 49-18 | OV | 53 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -7 | W | 35-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Chattanooga | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mississippi St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UL Monroe | -28.5 | W | 62-13 | OV | 54.5 | -7.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 13.5 | -17 | W | 41-3 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Minnesota U | -1 | W | 38-13 | UN | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | W | 28-6 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ South Carolina | 3.5 | W | 41-34 | OV | 60 | 0.5 | L | 0-13 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 14-23 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri | -3.5 | W | 31-24 | UN | 58.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Tennessee Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Army | 27 | 0 | 31 | -5 | 31 | 36 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | +26 / +4 | -20 / -3.5 |
| Louisiana Tech | 21 | 46.5 | 37(1) | | 38 | 22 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | +74 / -24 | -44.5 / +27.5 |
There's a little bit of recent familiarity between these programs after Army beat Louisiana Tech in the 2024 Independence Bowl. Army handled business as a short road favorite at Temple last week. Louisiana Tech is coming off a bye after falling at LSU and Baylor over the previous two weeks. The Bulldogs have covered the spread in all three of their games this season. We have this game lined above a field goal, so we have some very mild interest in backing the Knights at the opening number of -2. Army had an early-season bye in Week 3, so last week's trip to Temple required some rust to be knocked off and we're willing to excuse some of the sloppy play. Also, Louisiana Tech played Baylor without starting QB DJ Lagway, and we now know that LSU's Sam Leavitt was likely battling some form of injury (perhaps multiple) when the Tigers and Bulldogs played. While Louisiana Tech covered the spread in both contests, we can now surround each of those results with a little more context.
Play Army
| Army | 34.7 / 16 | +18.7 | 31 | 40 | -14.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Louisiana Tech | 37.7 / 29 | +8.7 | 38 | 28 | +3.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Army | 09-25 | @ Temple | -3.5 | 48.5 | 21-17 | Louisiana Tech | 09-19 | @ Baylor | +20.5 | 50.5 | 19-36 |
| | 09-12 | South Flo. | -3 | 45.5 | 24-28 | | 09-12 | @ LSU | +34.5 | 55 | 14-45 |
| | 09-05 | Bryant | -37 | 51.5 | 59-3 | | 09-05 | Northwest. | -44.5 | 56.5 | 80-6 |
|
| 12-28-24 | Louisiana Tech | 0 | 45 | | / | /// | / |
| Army | 0 | -15 | | / | /// | / |
| 12-28-24 | Louisiana Tech | 6 | 45 | 11 | 22/49 | 14/28/1/169 | 0/0 |
| Army | 27 | -15 | 26 | 64/322 | 2/9/0/65 | 1/1 |
| Army |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Bryant | -37 | W | 59-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 31-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | South Florida | -3 | L | 24-28 | OV | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 23 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Temple | -3.5 | W | 21-17 | UN | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northwestern State | -44.5 | W | 80-6 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 63-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ LSU | 34.5 | W | 14-45 | OV | 55 | 9.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 21.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Baylor | 20.5 | W | 19-36 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 11.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas St | 23 | 49 | 38.5 | | 39 | 43 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +24 / -21 | -19 / +15 |
| Louisiana | 45 | -5 | 36(2) | -4.5 | 37 | 52 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-0-1 / 2-0 | 0-2 / 1-1 | +19 / +4 | -14 / +11 |
Louisiana has won seven of the last eight meetings, including a 34-30 road win at Arkansas State last season. The RedWolves' lone win over the Cajuns in recent years came in 2023 as a 7.5-point home 'dog. Arkansas State scored off a 27-yard fumble return for a touchdown and a 93-yard kickoff return for a touchdown in last year's contest, yet the RedWolves still couldn't close the deal at home. If not then...when?! Louisiana has covered the number in every game thus far, including last week's 34-7 road win at Charlotte. The Cajuns' defense held the 49ers to 137 total yards and six first downs on 3.0 yards per play. Arkansas State earned a nice home win over Kennesaw State last week, but the RedWolves have gotten smacked by Memphis and TCU when trying to make a jump in class. Closely-lined games like this simply have not gone the RedWolves' way in recent years. They closed as a 4.5-point road favorite at Kennesaw State last year and lost by a touchdown. They closed as a 1.5-point road 'dog at UL-Monroe and lost by 12. They closed as a 2.5-point home favorite against Louisiana last year and lost by four. They closed as a 6,5-point home favorite over Kennesaw last week and won by a field goal. This hasn't been a good spot for Arkansas State in the past, and the Ragin Cajuns have proven to be a trustworthy commodity with Lunch Winfield at the helm.
Play Louisiana
| Arkansas St | 25.3 / 17.3 | +8 | 39 | 39 | -6.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Louisiana | 28.3 / 23.3 | +5 | 37 | 35 | +5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Arkansas St | 09-26 | Kennesaw . | -6.5 | 53 | 17-14 | Louisiana | 09-26 | @ Charlotte | -9 | 49 | 34-7 |
| | 09-19 | @ TCU | +19 | 56.5 | 7-31 | | 09-19 | UAB | -7 | 55.5 | 21-14 |
| | 09-12 | WEST GEOR. | -31.5 | 56.5 | 52-7 | | 09-12 | @ USC | +30.5 | 59 | 30-49 |
|
| 11-20-25 | Louisiana | 34 | 54 | 16 | 46/202 | 18/25/0/147 | 3/0 |
| Arkansas St | 30 | -2.5 | 24 | 35/138 | 25/43/0/256 | 2/2 |
| 11-09-24 | Arkansas St | 19 | 60 | 27 | 39/209 | 25/37/2/192 | 0/0 |
| Louisiana | 55 | -14 | 27 | 33/278 | 22/33/0/301 | 1/0 |
| Arkansas St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Memphis | 10.5 | L | 24-42 | OV | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-21 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -31.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 56.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ TCU | 19 | L | 7-31 | UN | 56.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 10.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Kennesaw State | -6.5 | L | 17-14 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-0-1 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lamar | -20.5 | W | 38-7 | UN | 48.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ USC | 30.5 | W | 30-49 | OV | 59 | 7.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 18.5 | W | 10-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UAB | -7 | PK | 21-14 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Charlotte | -9 | W | 34-7 | UN | 49 | -2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -5.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida | 38 | -5.5 | 10 | -3 | 11 | 8 | 3-0 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 1-0 | +39.3 / +5 | -27 / -2.5 |
| Missouri | 28 | 58 | 15(2) | | 15 | 16 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +25 / +5 | -41 / -0.5 |
The home team has won each of the last four meetings in this SEC showdown, but the Gators and Tigers have not played since November 2023. The Gators are off to a 2-0 start in conference play following a pair of wins over Auburn and Ole Miss. Head coaching hires will always generate more of the headlines, but Buster Faulkner's introduction as Florida's offensive coordinator may have been one of the most-impactful moves in the country during the offseason. Just go look at the team he left, Georgia Tech, and see how far the Yellow Jackets have fallen since Faulkner went south from Atlanta to Gainesville nine months ago. In four games with Faulkner running the offense, Florida has scored 66, 52, 44 and 52 points. Speaking of getting overshadowed, Missouri's effort against Mississippi State probably deserved a little more credit. After falling behind 14-0 in the first quarter, the Tigers clawed back to take a seven-point lead midway through the fourth quarter before the Bulldogs eventually gained control. Austin Simmons threw for 295 yards and three touchdowns in a tough environment. With the whole college football world ready to crown Mississippi State QB Kamario Taylor, Missouri nearly cut those celebrations short last week. Time for the age-old question: Can they do it again? Missouri's defense was on the field for 78 plays last week as Mississippi State generated 27 first downs on 6.4 yards per play. Taylor threw for 360 yards and Bulldogs’ running back Fluff Bothwell ran for 122 yards on 25 carries. The Tigers' defense better pick themselves off the mat because if they thought last week's loss hurt, the Gators are capable of adding an extra twist of the knife with Faulkner calling the shots.
Play the Over
| Florida | 49.3 / 23.3 | +26 | 13 | 26 | -19.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Missouri | 29.7 / 23 | +6.7 | 15 | 27 | -9 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Florida | 09-26 | Mississip. | -4 | 59 | 52-28 | Missouri | 09-26 | @ Mississip. | +3.5 | 58.5 | 24-31 |
| | 09-19 | @ Auburn | -2.5 | 53.5 | 44-39 | | 09-19 | Troy | -26.5 | 49.5 | 27-17 |
| | 09-12 | Campbell | -51.5 | 66.5 | 52-3 | | 09-11 | @ Kansas | -4.5 | 51.5 | 38-21 |
| Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Florida Atlantic | -25.5 | W | 66-21 | OV | 59.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Campbell | -51.5 | L | 52-3 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 45-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Auburn | -2.5 | W | 44-39 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Mississippi | -4 | W | 52-28 | OV | 59 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Missouri |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Arkansas Pine Bluff | -55.5 | L | 54-14 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 40-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | @ Kansas | -4.5 | W | 38-21 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | L | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Troy | -26.5 | L | 27-17 | UN | 49.5 | -7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -15 | L | 24-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Mississippi St | 3.5 | L | 24-31 | UN | 58.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| West Virginia | 31 | 53 | 27.5 | | 27 | 23 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 | +11.7 / - | -21.5 / - |
| Iowa State | 27 | -3 | 26(3) | -4.5 | 27 | 13 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 1-2 / 1-0 | 2-1 / 0-1 | +20.7 / -3 | -15 / +14 |
Iowa State is 5-1 straight-up and against the spread in the last six installations of this Big XII matchup. Six of the last seven meetings between the Cyclones and Mountaineers have stayed under the total. Both teams are coming off disappointing home losses last week as Iowa State fell to Utah while West Virginia dropped a back-and-forth affair with Oklahoma State. We're not looking to penalize West Virginia TOO much for last week's performance because the Cowboys were simply on fire. Oklahoma State generated 609 total yards and 25 first downs on 9.0 yards per play. Even with that dominant performance from Oklahoma State’s offense, West Virginia still held a lead with under three minutes remaining in the third quarter before the Cowboys eventually pulled away. Iowa State has played well this season, but Rich Rodriguez shouldn't have to worry about the Cyclones generating 600 yards on offense like Oklahoma State did. When Coach Rodriguez has things clicking, his teams typically get better as the season goes on. After a shaky performance against Coastal Carolina in the opener, the Mountaineers buried Virginia in a non-conference game in Charlotte. Running back Cam Cook generated 193 yards last week against the Cowboys as he begins to settle into Big XII play after making the jump from Jacksonville State. There's still room for this Mountaineers team to get better, but it feels like we may have already seen some of Iowa State's best work. The Cyclones covered the spread by double digits in back-to-back games against Iowa and Bowling Green, but Iowa State was thoroughly out-played last week at home against Utah. Jaylen Raynor always showed some flashes during his time at Arkansas State, but going 21-of-40 for 205 yards and two interceptions is not going to cut it as he makes the jump from the Sun Belt to the Big XII. We'll take the points with the visitors from Morgantown. Cue up Country Roads.
Play West Virginia
| West Virginia | 38 / 25 | +13 | 27 | 32 | -11 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Iowa State | 28.3 / 18 | +10.3 | 27 | 25 | -0.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| West Virginia | 09-26 | Oklahoma . | -2 | 60.5 | 24-41 | Iowa State | 09-26 | Utah | +7.5 | 46.5 | 17-31 |
| | 09-19 | @ Virginia | +10.5 | 51.5 | 38-27 | | 09-19 | Bowling G. | -22.5 | 43.5 | 55-7 |
| | 09-12 | Tenn Mart. | -41.5 | 57 | 52-7 | | 09-12 | @ Iowa | +14 | 42.5 | 13-16 |
|
| 10-12-24 | Iowa State | 28 | -3 | 24 | 43/130 | 18/26/0/265 | 0/0 |
| West Virginia | 16 | 54 | 23 | 31/150 | 18/32/2/206 | 1/0 |
| West Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Coastal Carolina | -21 | L | 31-24 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Tenn Martin | -41.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 57 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Virginia | 10.5 | W | 38-27 | OV | 51.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma State | -2 | L | 24-41 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13 | -0.5 | W | 14-13 | UN | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Missouri St | -29.5 | L | 38-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Iowa | 14 | W | 13-16 | UN | 42.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Bowling Green | -22.5 | W | 55-7 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | W | 35-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Utah | 7.5 | L | 17-31 | OV | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 4.5 | L | 3-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wyoming | 9 | 44 | 46 | | 42 | 36 | 2-0 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 1-1 | +12.5 / -18 | -11 / +0.5 |
| North Dakota State | 32 | -17 | 27(2) | -21 | 28 | 53 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 1-1 | +32 / +13.5 | -24 / -13.5 |
There’s word out of Wyoming that even Old Faithful at Yellowstone erupted a few more times than usual last Saturday at the thought of Jay Sawvel’s Cowboys scoring 27 points (wow!) and delivering a sound thrashing to visiting Hawaii, which as punishment should have been forced to spend this whole week in Laramie. The football part was all true about Sawvel’s team last weekend as Wyoming’s offense finally demonstrated some of the balance expected when offensive coordinator Christian Taylor moved along with QB Tyler Hughes from William & Mary in the offseason. It wasn’t an Oregon vs. Portland State-like explosion of points, but Hughes did nicely balance the attack that generated an efficient 204 passing yards and another 183 on the ground, sparked by running backs Samuel Harris and Western Illinois Leathernecks transfer Markell Holman combining for nearly 200 rushing yards. That was last week, however, vs. a travel-weary foe making a 3,325-mile one-way trip. This week, it’s off to the hornet’s nest of the Fargodome, where they’re even more excited about the hometown Bison as North Dakota State now finds itself not only eligible for bowl games and the Mountain West title, but a place in the 12-team playoff (not as far-fetched as it sounds) as the transition period for schools moving from the FCS to FBS level has been scotched by the courts. Tim Polasek’s Bison have already cleared one significant Mountain West hurdle (Air Force on the road), and after scoring better than 41 points per game in the FCS ranks a year ago, are handling the adjustment to the top level just fine, tallying a brisk 35 points per game behind senior QB Nathan Hayes, who patiently awaited his turn in Fargo and is now in the process of emulating predecessors like Carson Wentz and Trey Lance by completing 67-percent of his passes in very composed fashion. After winning ten FCS titles in a 14-season span from 2011-24, this isn’t like Sacramento State moving up to the MAC, as the Bison are making good on their promise to be competitive right away at the top level and to prove they mean business also rank a robust 16th nationally in total defense while allowing a mere 254.8 yards per game. Though we pause for a moment and wonder if the marketplace hasn’t reacted a bit much to this interesting storyline and pushed the spread to its outer limits near three TDs, the alternative is a Cowboys team that was out-scored 59-23 in two road games to date at Colorado State and Central Michigan. In that context, perhaps this impost isn’t unreasonable.
Play North Dakota State
| Wyoming | 19.3 / 15.7 | +3.7 | 42 | 46 | -7.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| North Dakota State | 35.7 / 14 | +21.7 | 28 | 47 | -22.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Wyoming | 09-26 | Hawaii | +2 | 44 | 27-10 | North Dakota State | 09-19 | @ Sacrament. | -24.5 | 50.5 | 31-10 |
| | 09-19 | @ Central M. | -1.5 | 40 | 10-24 | | 09-12 | @ Air Force | -2 | 48.5 | 38-32 |
| | 09-12 | Northern . | -23.5 | 44.5 | 21-13 | | 09-05 | Fordham | -41.5 | 54 | 38-0 |
| Wyoming |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Colorado State | 2.5 | L | 13-35 | OV | 46 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9 | 0.5 | L | 6-14 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Northern Colorado | -23.5 | L | 21-13 | UN | 44.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 7-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Michigan | -1.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 40 | 0 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 19.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Hawaii | 2 | W | 27-10 | UN | 44 | 0.5 | W | 3-3 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-3 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Dakota State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Jacksonville St | -6.5 | W | 33-7 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -3.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Fordham | -41.5 | L | 38-0 | UN | 54 | | W | 3-0 | OV | | | W | 17-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Air Force | -2 | W | 38-32 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 28-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Sacramento State | -24.5 | L | 31-10 | UN | 50.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 10.5 | -14.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/29 1:01 pm |
| California | 20 | 0 | 26 | -3 | 25 | 20 | 1-2 / 1-0 | 0-3 / 1-0 | 1-2 / 0-1 | +2.3 / +3 | -18 / +4 |
| UNLV | 23 | 51.5 | 30(1) | | 28 | 52 | 0-1 / 2-1 | 0-1 / 2-1 | 0-1 / 0-3 | -6 / +1.7 | -4.5 / -6 |
The Golden Bears finally make it to Las Vegas after being originally scheduled as the first team to play UNLV at Allegiant Stadium in 2020 before Covid intervened. Now in 2026, Cal fans are best advised not to draw analogies with the Denver Broncos and Sean Payton sticking with Davis Webb as his new play-caller and starting to be rewarded for keeping the faith after a bumpy start. We’re hardly sure new Bears head coach Tosh Lupoi is at the same place with his new OC Jordan Somerville, who is looking a bit overwhelmed in his first go as a play-caller. Somerville’s connection to sophomore QB Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele - the “franchise” these days in Berkeley - is regressing alarmingly under Somerville’s tutelage. All of his meaningful stat lines vs. FBS foes (including QB Rating, completion percentage, and yards per pass) are considerably down from his promising freshman campaign. Could Lupoi perhaps consider handing the reins to Nick Rolovich, the former Hawaii and Washington State head coach who is still on staff and from last season when serving as an aide (and briefly interim head coach) on the Justin Wilcox staff, and who connected nicely with JKS a year ago? Stay tuned. In the meantime, Cal might have to rely on its defense, which did bail out Lupoi and Somerville a few weeks ago at Syracuse and will offer a bit more resistance to Dan Mullen’s Rebels than an overmatched and slower Akron a week ago. Though Mullen’s offensive front didn’t allow a sack last week, QB Jackson Arnold had taken more blows than George Chuvalo (RIP, George) when getting sacked 11 times in previous early-season games after being bounced off the ground a combined 64 times the past two years at Oklahoma and Auburn. If neither QB is up to it, the difference maker might be UNLV’s slashing RB Jai’Den Thomas, who burned the Zips for 113 rushing yards after stinging Hawaii with 143 yards a few weeks before. After four-straight “under” results to start the season, are we sure UNLV’s games should still be lined in the 50s?
Play the Under
| California | 26.7 / 16.3 | +10.3 | 25 | 34 | -17.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| UNLV | 21.7 / 20 | +1.7 | 27 | 40 | -6 | 0-0 / 2-1 | 0-0 / 2-1 | 0-0 / 0-3 |
| California | 09-25 | Clemson | +2.5 | 52 | 10-24 | UNLV | 09-26 | @ Akron | -13 | 53 | 38-10 |
| | 09-19 | Wagner | -58.5 | 65.5 | 49-7 | | 09-12 | @ North Tex. | -3 | 58.5 | 6-44 |
| | 09-12 | @ Syracuse | +4 | 57 | 21-18 | | 09-05 | @ Hawaii | -1.5 | 55 | 21-6 |
|
| 12-18-24 | California | 13 | 45 | 21 | 43/182 | 19/39/0/166 | 2/1 |
| UNLV | 24 | -3 | 12 | 38/145 | 6/19/0/148 | 0/0 |
| California |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UCLA | 2.5 | L | 24-45 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Syracuse | 4 | W | 21-18 | UN | 57 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-12 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Wagner | -58.5 | L | 49-7 | UN | 65.5 | | W | 29-0 | OV | | | W | 39-7 | OV | |
| 09-25-26 | Clemson | 2.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 52 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UNLV |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-2-1 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:0-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Memphis | -4.5 | L | 21-27 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13 | -3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Hawaii | -1.5 | W | 21-6 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ North Texas | -3 | L | 6-44 | UN | 58.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-13 | P | 13 | -1.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Akron | -13 | W | 38-10 | UN | 53 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7 | L | 14-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oregon State | 40 | -7 | 30 | -6 | 33 | 46 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 2-0 | 2-0 / 1-1 | +12 / +6.5 | +4.5 / +5 |
| Colorado State | 28 | 61 | 39(3) | | 38 | 28 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-0-1 | 3-0 / 1-0 | +12.7 / -14 | -2 / +14 |
We’re advising Mel Counts, Gary Payton, Chad Ochocinco and anyone else with ties to Corvallis to enjoy JaMarcus Shephard while they can, as we can think of several locales (maybe including one of Shephard’s past stops, Washington, considering current Huskies head coach Jedd Fisch is known to have considerable career wanderlust) where Oregon State’s first-year coach might land in the near future. All Shephard has done in a month is to get the Beavers punching well above their weight like they haven’t done almost since the long-ago era of Dee Andros, looking bowl-bound and like a real contender in the new Pac-12 after putting up real battles vs. Big XII heavyweights Texas Tech and Houston while romping past two other foes including UTEP in a 33-7 demolition at the Sun Bowl last week. For our purposes, it’s the easy 4-0 spread mark that has also caught our attention and marked Shephard as a coach to watch...especially as he hasn’t been afraid to make bold moves. The biggest of those - to the surprise of Pac-12 observers - was benching returning QB Maalik Murphy at the outset of the campaign in favor of under-the-radar Mercer transfer Braden Atkinson, who tossed 34 TD passes in the SoCon a year ago and is on pace for another monster season with already 1,421 passing yards (ranking third nationally) and 11 TD passes in just four games. Sure, the Beavers aren’t running much, but that’s the avant-garde design of new OC Mitch Dahlen, who followed Shephard from Kalen DeBoer’s Alabama staff with instructions for Atkinson to fire away and use Vandy transfer RB AJ Newberry as an occasional downhill change-of-pace, like last week vs. the Miners when rolling for 111 rushing yards on just 11 carries. Moreover, deep-threat freshman WR Jesse Legree (a Paul Warfield-like 25.4 yards per catch!) is about to become a rich young man after grabbing at least one TD pass and racking up 100 or more receiving yards in all four games to date. Granted, the host Rams think they might be on the ascent, too, with new head coach Jim Mora. The former UConn leader has already had to mix-and-match with promising dual-threat Oklahoma State transfer QB Hauss Henjy (10 TD passes in slightly more than eight quarters of action with a chance to return to active duty this weekend) sidelined since mid-September with a hamstring strain. Backup K’Saan Farrar, who followed Mora from UConn, didn’t fare too badly last week at the Alamodome vs. UTSA when grilling the Roadrunners with 344 passing yards and a couple of TDs. Mora, however, has to be concerned with the Rams’ recent imitations of traffic cones on defense, conceding a combined 100 points the past two games vs. BYU and UTSA, and allowing the Roadrunners to rip through them at will last Saturday en route to 59 points and 542 yards worth of offense. That suggests to us that the most vulnerable platoon on the field is Mora’s defense, which after being stretched at the seams by the Roadrunners’ Owen McCown last week could get bent completely out of shape by the rapid-fire Atkinson.
Play the Over
| Oregon State | 36.3 / 19.7 | +16.7 | 34 | 36 | -1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Colorado State | 42 / 41.3 | +0.7 | 37 | 32 | +3.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Oregon State | 09-26 | @ UTEP | -11 | 56 | 33-7 | Colorado State | 09-26 | @ Tex San A. | +14 | 56.5 | 45-59 |
| | 09-19 | Montana | -17.5 | 56.5 | 52-17 | | 09-19 | BYU | +17.5 | 55 | 23-41 |
| | 09-12 | Texas Tech | +26 | 52.5 | 24-35 | | 09-12 | Southern . | -20.5 | 57.5 | 58-24 |
|
| 10-05-24 | Colorado State | 31 | 47 | 22 | 39/176 | 20/30/0/263 | 1/1 |
| Oregon State | 39 | -10 | 26 | 47/251 | 16/28/1/147 | 2/1 |
| Oregon State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:4-0 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Houston U | 21 | W | 20-33 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-9 | OV | 10.5 | 12.5 | W | 7-19 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Texas Tech | 26 | W | 24-35 | OV | 52.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 14.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Montana | -17.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ UTEP | -11 | W | 33-7 | UN | 56 | -2.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -6.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Colorado State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-1-1 , O/U:4-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Wyoming | -2.5 | W | 35-13 | OV | 46 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9 | -0.5 | W | 14-6 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern Utah | -20.5 | W | 58-24 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 17-7 | OV | | | W | 48-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | BYU | 17.5 | L | 23-41 | OV | 55 | 4.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 11.5 | 9.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | 14 | PK | 45-59 | OV | 56.5 | 3.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | L | 21-35 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah State | 17 | 51 | 39.5 | | 40 | 38 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 0-2 | -0.5 / -17.5 | -9.5 / +27.5 |
| Boise State | 30 | -19.5 | 20(3) | -22.5 | 20 | 35 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 1-1 / 2-0 | 2-0 / 1-1 | +16 / +9 | -19 / +9 |
If believing the talking heads at ESPN and elsewhere, Boise State might as well be Secretariat at the 1973 Belmont, almost pre-ordained to be the Group of Six representative in the 12-team playoff after dusting off two of the teams expected to offer some competition for that bid - Memphis and Western Michigan - in the past three weeks, and after a very honorable loss at highly-ranked Oregon in the opener. That spot in the playoffs might all be true as the Broncos don’t figure to be underdogs or even close to it for the remainder of the regular season, with QB Maddux Madsen reminding all what head coach Spencer Danielson was missing in last November’s losses to Fresno State and San Diego State, with Madsen hurt and those results effectively ending longshot playoff hopes a year ago. The oddsmakers, however, are starting to ask a lot of the Broncos, who if you recall did perhaps let their guards down vs. capable FCS rep South Dakota two weeks ago on the blue carpet and found themselves level with the Coyotes into the fourth quarter. Bronco Mendenhall’s Aggies might not be better than South Dakota, but breaking their 2026 duck last week vs. Troy suggested that they could be figuring things out just a bit in Logan. Virginia transfer QB Grady Brosterhous is starting to remind of another dual-threat who escaped Charlottesville last year, Anthony Colandrea (UNLV, and now Nebraska), when accounting for 331 yards via ground and air last week vs. the Sun Belt contender Trojans. Meaningful, as Mendenhall seems to have settled on a QB after BYU transfer McCae Hillstead was too mistake-prone (three picks in the opening loss to Idaho State) before an arm injury, and the emergence of Brosterhous, which likely keeps Hillstead on the sidelines until further notice. Remember, too, that the Aggies have already been in pretty tough this season at Washington and Utah, against rugged defenses at least on a par if not better than Boise’s, and Mendenhall has offered good value as an underdog lately as the Aggies’ 7-2 spread mark getting points since the start of last season (and a narrow 1-point loss to the Broncos at Logan last November) would attest.
Play Utah State
09/28 11:01 AM PDT — Utah State QB McCae Hillstead is questionable to return this week after missing the previous three games with a forearm injury.
| Utah State | 11.7 / 19.7 | -8 | 40 | 21 | +17 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Boise State | 36 / 17 | +19 | 20 | 38 | -15.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Utah State | 09-26 | Troy | -3 | 48 | 21-10 | Boise State | 09-26 | @ Western M. | -8 | 50.5 | 32-7 |
| | 09-19 | @ Utah | +26.5 | 55.5 | 0-33 | | 09-19 | South Dak. | -28.5 | 61.5 | 38-24 |
| | 09-12 | @ Washingto. | +28 | 55.5 | 14-16 | | 09-12 | Memphis | -9.5 | 55 | 38-20 |
|
| 11-28-25 | Boise State | 25 | -1.5 | 28 | 46/171 | 26/49/0/341 | 1/1 |
| Utah State | 24 | 54.5 | 22 | 34/221 | 13/32/0/184 | 2/1 |
| 10-05-24 | Utah State | 30 | 66.5 | 21 | 34/135 | 27/41/0/372 | 1/1 |
| Boise State | 62 | -28 | 27 | 41/298 | 26/32/1/303 | 0/0 |
| Utah State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-4 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Idaho State | -15.5 | L | 17-29 | UN | 58.5 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | L | 10-16 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Washington U | 28 | W | 14-16 | UN | 55.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 17 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Utah | 26.5 | L | 0-33 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-16 | OV | 13.5 | 15.5 | L | 0-26 | UN | 30 |
| 09-26-26 | Troy | -3 | W | 21-10 | UN | 48 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Boise State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Oregon | 25.5 | W | 27-34 | OV | 53 | 7 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 14.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Memphis | -9.5 | W | 38-20 | OV | 55 | -3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -6 | L | 17-20 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | South Dakota | -28.5 | L | 38-24 | OV | 61.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-14 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Western Michigan | -8 | W | 32-7 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 8-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4.5 | W | 15-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indiana | 38 | -24.5 | 5.5 | -22.5 | 5 | 20 | 4-0 / 0-0 | 0-4 / 0-0 | 2-2 / 0-0 | +33.8 / - | -41 / - |
| Rutgers | 10 | 56 | 30(2) | | 29 | 55 | 1-2 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 3-0 / 0-1 | +9.3 / -7 | -17 / +3 |
Rutgers has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings, but the last one was in October 2023. In the world of Big Ten timekeeping, that is known as B.C. - Before Cignetti. Things look a lot different in Bloomington and the Big Ten nowadays, but the Hoosier faithful are still waiting for their first point spread cover in 2026. Cignetti's bunch is 0-4 against the spread this season after narrowly beating Northwestern last week. The transition from Heisman winner Fernando Mendoza to TCU transfer Josh Hoover has not gone swimmingly, even though Hoover has 11 touchdown passes with no interceptions thus far. Cignetti will never ask for or look for excuses, but we're willing to give him a couple. North Texas looks much better than originally anticipated under first-year head coach Neal Brown. Even though Indiana failed to cover the spread in that opener, a 36-point win over North Texas now looks pretty good in hindsight considering the Mean Green beat UNLV by 38 and just beat Houston Christian by 49 last week. Against Western Kentucky, the Hilltoppers essentially punted before the game started. WKU completely changed its style of play, held its starting QB out of the lineup and simply tried to bleed the clock for as long as possible to get out of Bloomington in good health. And last week against Northwestern, the Hoosiers were tasked with defending a Chip Kelly offense, which hadn't put much on film through the first three weeks. Cignetti probably doesn't want them, but we can offer a couple excuses on those performances. Sorry, Rutgers, we don't have too many excuses for you. The Knights picked up a win over FCS-level Howard last week, but they are still searching for their first win over an FBS opponent after falling to UMass, Boston College and USC. Cignetti has heard the small chirps by now. It's time to make a statement.
Play Indiana
| Indiana | 40.7 / 7.7 | +33 | 4 | 39 | -41 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Rutgers | 38 / 25.7 | +12.3 | 30 | 33 | -6 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Indiana | 09-25 | Northwest. | -20.5 | 49.5 | 29-23 | Rutgers | 09-25 | Howard | -42 | 57 | 58-7 |
| | 09-19 | Western K. | -44.5 | 58 | 38-0 | | 09-19 | USC | +21 | 58.5 | 35-42 |
| | 09-12 | Howard | -58.5 | 68 | 55-0 | | 09-11 | @ Boston Co. | +3 | 53.5 | 21-28 |
| Indiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-0 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-2-1 | 1H SUR:4-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Texas | -40 | L | 52-16 | OV | 57.5 | -10.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -24 | L | 24-6 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Howard | -58.5 | L | 55-0 | UN | 68 | | W | 20-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Western Kentucky | -44.5 | L | 38-0 | UN | 58 | -13.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 14.5 | -26.5 | L | 14-0 | UN | 34.5 |
| 09-25-26 | Northwestern | -20.5 | L | 29-23 | OV | 49.5 | -6.5 | L | 2-0 | UN | 10.5 | -11.5 | W | 12-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rutgers |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:3-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Massachusetts | -29.5 | L | 21-37 | OV | 55 | -7.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -17.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-11-26 | @ Boston College | 3 | L | 21-28 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | USC | 21 | W | 35-42 | OV | 58.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | 13.5 | W | 14-20 | OV | 31 |
| 09-25-26 | Howard | -42 | W | 58-7 | OV | 57 | | W | 21-7 | OV | | | W | 41-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/29 12:12 pm |
| Fresno State | 24 | 45 | 27 | -9 | 28 | 45 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 0-2 | +30 / -11.5 | -15 / +9.5 |
| Washington State | 17 | -2 | 38(2) | | 36 | 18 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 0-2 | +15.5 / -20.5 | -14 / +21 |
It’s a first meeting in the new Pac-12 for these two, though there’s some history in this rivalry, including a wild 1992 shootout in the Central Valley when Drew Bledsoe’s Washington State outscored a Fresno side featuring Trent Dilfer that would - a few months later - make its mark with a memorable Holiday Bowl upset of USC. Though we’re not expecting anything resembling that 39-37 fireworks show from over 30 years ago as we instead look closely for any buy signals from either side. A measured vote, however, for the Bulldogs and head coach Matt Entz, whose first Fresno edition gradually improved a year ago as the current version looks to be doing as it has seen off a diverse collection of foes since being swamped at USC in the opener. Perhaps we can excuse that loss to the Trojans as Entz threw new QB Jayden Mandal into the deep end for his first-ever start with predictable results, but since then, Mandal has gradually become more comfy at the controls with six TD passes vs. no picks in the three games (all wins) since the opener. Mandal finished with three TD passes last week vs. Rice when the Bulldogs balanced things nicely with 249 rush yards (167 of those from slashing RB Rayshon Luke) and Mandal coolly adding 210 more yards via the air. Moreover, an experienced Fresno defense that returned more than half of its starters from a platoon that ranked 10th nationally in total defense last year has also allowed only 12 points per game since the USC opener. While the Cougs did show some spunk for new head coach Kirby Moore in the Apple Cup opener at Washington and playing Big XII Arizona tough into the fourth quarter last week at Pullman, the offense remains imbalanced. Toss out a romp past overmatched FCS rep Duquesne, and Wazzu is gaining less than 100 yards per game on the ground as UC Davis transfer QB Caden Pinnick (only three TD passes vs. four picks) is being asked to do a bit of everything. Pinnick’s scrambles from the pocket are still the best option in the limited Cougar playbook. Mostly, however, WSU isn't getting the sort of double-digit spread here that allowed it to stay within generous numbers in the Apple Cup and vs. Arizona, while Fresno’s recent win at San Jose State suggests this is a road assignment the Bulldogs can likely handle.
Play Fresno State
| Fresno State | 37.7 / 12.3 | +25.3 | 29 | 46 | -11 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Washington State | 26.3 / 25 | +1.3 | 35 | 30 | -3.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Fresno State | 09-26 | Rice | -12 | 43 | 38-24 | Washington State | 09-26 | Arizona U | +11 | 47 | 24-34 |
| | 09-19 | @ San Jose . | -4 | 47.5 | 26-10 | | 09-19 | Duquesne | -38.5 | 52 | 48-7 |
| | 09-12 | Sacrament. | -17.5 | 43.5 | 49-3 | | 09-12 | @ Kansas St. | +17.5 | 48.5 | 7-34 |
|
| 10-12-24 | Washington State | 25 | -3.5 | 23 | 34/123 | 17/35/1/172 | 1/0 |
| Fresno State | 17 | 60 | 22 | 27/118 | 24/36/2/220 | 0/0 |
| Fresno State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:0-3 , PSR:0-3-1 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2-1 , O/U:3-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ USC | 22.5 | L | 0-39 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | PK | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-30 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Sacramento State | -17.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -10.5 | W | 32-0 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Jose State | -4 | W | 26-10 | UN | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | PK | 6-3 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | Rice | -12 | W | 38-24 | OV | 43 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Washington State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:3-1 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-0-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Washington U | 24 | W | 10-24 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 14 | W | 0-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kansas State | 17.5 | L | 7-34 | UN | 48.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10 | 10 | PK | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Duquesne | -38.5 | W | 48-7 | OV | 52 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Arizona U | 11 | W | 24-34 | OV | 47 | 3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas State | 34 | -10 | 33 | -4 | 31 | 55 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 0-1 | 2-1 / 1-0 | +20.7 / -52 | -11.5 / +29.5 |
| San Diego State | 31 | 57.5 | 38(1) | | 32 | 36 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 1-1 | +10 / -21.5 | -21 / +8 |
New conference foes in the Pac-12, this is the first-ever meeting between San Diego State and Texas State. The Aztecs would certainly like to be entering the new league with a little more momentum because SDSU is 1-3 straight-up, 0-4 against the spread this season. We, along with many others, expected to see improvement from San Diego State's offense this season, but Jayden Denegal is only completing 56.1-percent of his passes and he's not getting much help from the Aztec rushing attack. Running backs Josiah Lucas and Lucky Sutton combined for 29 rushing yards on 17 attempts in last week's 41-16 loss at Toledo. With the benefit of some hindsight, San Diego State's defensive performances against James Madison (26 points and 20 first downs allowed) and UCLA (only allowed one score in the first three quarters) look pretty good with some added context around the Dukes and Bruins. If the Aztecs' stop unit has one more good effort in them, we believe San Diego State can stay within this number. Texas State's last seven games have all been played in the Lone Star State. You have to go all the way back to 2020 (at Boston College) to find the last time the Bobcats left the geographical footprint of Texas and the surrounding states. We've given San Diego State a significant downgrade over the past couple weeks, but Texas State isn't a trustworthy entity by any means. The Bobcats lost the turnover battle 3-0 at home against UTSA and allowed 605 total yards and 33 first downs against North Texas. Asking that squad to win by margin on the road in California is a risky proposition.
Play San Diego State
| Texas State | 46 / 25.3 | +20.7 | 31 | 39 | -11.5 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| San Diego State | 13 / 31.7 | -18.7 | 28 | 27 | +4.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Texas State | 09-26 | Incarnate. | -30 | 66 | 63-10 | San Diego State | 09-26 | @ Toledo | +2.5 | 50.5 | 16-41 |
| | 09-19 | North Tex. | -3 | 62.5 | 49-35 | | 09-19 | James Mad. | -3 | 46.5 | 13-26 |
| | 09-12 | Tex San A. | -1.5 | 65.5 | 26-31 | | 09-12 | @ UCLA | +13.5 | 53.5 | 10-28 |
| Texas State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:3-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-1-1 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Texas | 29.5 | L | 7-59 | OV | 61.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-14 | P | 14 | 17.5 | L | 7-28 | OV | 33 |
| 09-12-26 | Tex San Antonio | -1.5 | L | 26-31 | UN | 65.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 14 | -0.5 | W | 17-7 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Texas | -3 | W | 49-35 | OV | 62.5 | -0.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 13.5 | -2 | L | 28-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Incarnate Word | -30 | W | 63-10 | OV | 66 | | W | 28-7 | OV | | | W | 42-10 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Diego State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:0-4 , O/U:2-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Portland St | -38.5 | L | 53-20 | OV | 61 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | W | 29-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ UCLA | 13.5 | L | 10-28 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | James Madison | -3 | L | 13-26 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 0-19 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Toledo | 2.5 | L | 16-41 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Jose State | 24 | 51.5 | 42 | | 44 | 29 | 1-1 / 1-1 | 0-2 / 2-0 | 0-2 / 1-1 | -3 / -5 | -9 / +19 |
| Hawaii | 22 | -2.5 | 41(3) | -4 | 37 | 44 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 1-1 / 0-2 | 0-2 / 1-1 | -2.5 / -13.5 | -3 / +1.5 |
Even the ghost of Don Ho might have been uttering expletives at the thought of his home-island Rainbow Warriors getting clocked by a punchless Wyoming last week. Fortunately for head coach Timmy Chang, Hawaiian Airlines allowed his team to board the charter back to Honolulu, but to this point the season hasn’t gone as planned for Chang. The Rainbow Warriors were considered a chic longshot pick to make the 12-team playoff out of the Group of Six, but instead opening with three depressing losses (at Stanford, home to UNLV, and last week at Wyoming) in their first four games that might make it hard to even qualify for the hometown Sheraton Hawaii Bowl, which always keeps a spot open for the Rainbows if they’re postseason eligible. What’s been wrong? Start with the offense, which aside from a couple of brief eruptions in the opener at Palo Alto and two weeks later at the Ching Complex vs. New Mexico State has been misfiring consistently, with QB Micah Alejado only on three TD passes one-third of the way through the season after tossing 24 scores a year ago. Alejado has only produced one TD pass across the past three games. As Chang can’t seem to get the ground game untracked, either (we’ll say...just 83 yards per game, ranking ahead of only Northern Illinois nationally, and gaining a paltry 3.2 yards per carry), it’s no wonder the offense is stuck in the sand at Waikiki Beach. Visiting San Jose State hasn’t quite had as many problems moving the ball, with a legit infantry presence in low-slung slasher Jabari Bates (on well over a 1,000-yard pace at 413 rushing yards), and the Spartans are properly-rested for the non-stop to Honolulu after having last week off to lick their wounds after a home loss to physical Fresno State. Moreover, it’s a special trip for island native and alum Ken Niumatalolo, who won this shootout 45-38 in Silicon Valley last fall to stretch the SJSU series win streak to five, not to mention a homecoming for ex-Hawaii QB Luke Weaver, who is posting better numbers than the man who beat him out in Honolulu (Alejado), such as a respectable nine TD passes to date.
Play San Jose State
| San Jose State | 22.3 / 22.3 | 0 | 43 | 43 | -5.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Hawaii | 15 / 22.3 | -7.3 | 35 | 38 | -2.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| San Jose State | 09-19 | Fresno St. | +4 | 47.5 | 10-26 | Hawaii | 09-26 | @ Wyoming | -2 | 44 | 10-27 |
| | 09-12 | Cal Poly | -21.5 | 58.5 | 30-20 | | 09-12 | New Mexic. | -7.5 | 50.5 | 29-19 |
| | 09-04 | @ Eastern M. | +1 | 55 | 27-21 | | 09-05 | UNLV | +1.5 | 55 | 6-21 |
|
| 11-01-25 | Hawaii | 38 | 55.5 | 22 | 25/95 | 32/47/0/401 | 1/1 |
| San Jose State | 45 | -2.5 | 26 | 28/172 | 20/40/0/458 | 2/0 |
| San Jose State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-2 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:3-0 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-1-1 , O/U:0-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ USC | 37 | W | 26-42 | OV | 61 | 10 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14 | 23.5 | L | 0-28 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 1 | W | 27-21 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 0 | W | 10-7 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Cal Poly | -21.5 | L | 30-20 | UN | 58.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 13-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Fresno State | 4 | L | 10-26 | UN | 47.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | PK | 3-6 | UN | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hawaii |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:0-4-0 | 1H SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-3 , O/U:1-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Stanford | 4.5 | L | 27-37 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10 | 3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 24 |
| 09-05-26 | UNLV | 1.5 | L | 6-21 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | New Mexico State | -7.5 | W | 29-19 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 9-0 | UN | 10 | -4 | W | 19-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Wyoming | -2 | L | 10-27 | UN | 44 | -0.5 | L | 3-3 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-13 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| KEY |
| Score | The predicted score for an event |
| PR | The team's Power Rating |
| GS Line | The GoldSheet line, calculated using each team's Power Rating. |
| Avg. PR | The average Power Rating of a team over the course of the season. |
| Avg. OPR | The average of a team's opponent Power Rating on the day that they played. |
| SUR (H/A) | The team's straight-up-record, both at home and on the road. |
| ATS (H/A) | The team's record against-the-spread. |
| O/U (H/A) | The team's over-under record. |
| Pts. Diff. (H/A) | The team's +/- point differential. |
| Avg. Ln. (H/A) | The average line the team has had over the course of the season. |
| PF/PA | The average points a team has scored and allowed. |
| FD | The total number of first downs. |
| RA/RY | The number of rushing attempts and yards. |
| PC/PA/I/PY | The number of passing completions, attempts, interceptions and yards. |
| RA/RY | The number of fumbles and fumbles lost. |
COPYRIGHT 2026 © THE GOLD SHEET
ALL RIGHT RESERVED.