October 27th
| Delaware | 31 | 55.5 | 38 | -4.5 | 42 | 46 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 2-1 | +12.5 / -17 | -8 / +13 |
| Western Kentucky | 34 | -2.5 | 43.5(1) | | 42 | 46 | 2-0 / 1-4 | 2-0 / 2-3 | 1-1 / 2-3 | +33 / -26.2 | -19 / +17.5 |
Western Kentucky captured last year's contest with a 27-24 road victory in Newark. The Blue Hens out-gained the Hilltoppers by 97 yards in that contest and held a 27-16 advantage in first downs, but the game swung on an interception returned for a touchdown in the third quarter as WKU scored three times in less than eight minutes. The 'Toppers are coming off a much-needed bye week. Western Kentucky played five road games in the first seven weeks with trips to Nevada, Georgia, Indiana, New Mexico and Texas. The Hilltoppers won-and-covered their two Conference-USA games against Missouri State and Sam Houston to stay in the mix. Liberty appears to be the class of the league thus far, but WKU will have their shot against the Flames in late-November. The Hilltoppers' last four games against FBS-level competition have all stayed under the total. Delaware QB Nick Minicucci returned to the Blue Hens' lineup in last week's 61-38 home win over Missouri State, and Delaware looked like a completely different team compared to the one that played without him over the prior three weeks (0-3 straight-up and against the spread). Minicucci scored six touchdowns (five passing and one rushing) last week against the Bears. We gave Delaware a strong adjustment for the return of Minicucci, and even with that, we still have Western Kentucky favored in this matchup. Delaware is 2-7 against the spread on the road since joining the FBS ranks at the beginning of last season. Minicucci gives them a spark on offense, but this is still a program that needs to learn how to win/cover on the road before they should be favored against a team that was widely viewed to be a contender in the league when the season started.
Play Western Kentucky
| Delaware | 35 / 33.7 | +1.3 | 45 | 42 | +1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Western Kentucky | 21 / 16.7 | +4.3 | 43 | 46 | +1.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Delaware | 10-20 | Missouri . | -3 | 54.5 | 61-38 | Western Kentucky | 10-14 | @ Sam Houst. | PK | 53.5 | 16-3 |
| | 10-13 | @ Middle Te. | -1 | 49.5 | 30-33 | | 10-08 | Missouri . | +2 | 56.5 | 34-13 |
| | 10-02 | Liberty | +7 | 51.5 | 14-30 | | 10-01 | @ New Mexic. | +2 | 56 | 13-34 |
|
| 10-03-25 | Western Kentucky | 27 | 63 | 16 | 26/108 | 23/31/0/230 | 1/1 |
| Delaware | 24 | -3 | 29 | 34/121 | 28/48/1/314 | 1/1 |
| Delaware |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-6 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:6-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Merrimack College | -31.5 | W | 42-7 | UN | 56.5 | 0 | W | 7-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 20.5 | W | 26-35 | OV | 53.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 11.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Coastal Carolina | -4.5 | W | 22-14 | UN | 56.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | -3 | L | 15-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Virginia | 20 | L | 3-42 | UN | 52 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 11.5 | 10.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Liberty | 7 | L | 14-30 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 9.5 | 4 | L | 0-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-13-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | -1 | L | 30-33 | OV | 49.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-5 | UN | 9.5 | 0 | W | 16-12 | OV | 24 |
| 10-20-26 | Missouri State | -3 | W | 61-38 | OV | 54.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -1.5 | L | 24-28 | OV | 27 |
| 10-27-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Western Kentucky |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Nevada | 0 | L | 14-49 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 7-21 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Georgia | 40.5 | L | 20-70 | OV | 55.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14 | 24.5 | L | 6-49 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Indiana | 44.5 | W | 0-38 | UN | 58 | 13.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 14.5 | 26.5 | W | 0-14 | UN | 34.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Mercyhurst | -40 | W | 52-7 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 10-01-26 | @ New Mexico State | 2 | L | 13-34 | UN | 56 | 0.5 | L | 3-6 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | L | 6-20 | UN | 28 |
| 10-08-26 | Missouri State | 2 | W | 34-13 | UN | 56.5 | 0 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | 0.5 | W | 21-6 | UN | 28 |
| 10-14-26 | @ Sam Houston St | 0 | W | 16-3 | UN | 53.5 | 0 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0 | W | 10-3 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-27-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sam Houston St | 27 | 51.5 | 53 | | 48 | 45 | 1-3 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 1-2 | +8.5 / -23.3 | -1.5 / +21 |
| Missouri State | 31 | -5.5 | 45.5(1) | -8.5 | 46 | 46 | 2-1 / 0-4 | 2-1 / 1-3 | 2-1 / 1-3 | +10.3 / -26 | -3.5 / +17.5 |
This will be the first meeting at the FBS level between the Bears and Bearkats. Missouri State had an extra day to prep for this one after falling at Delaware last Tuesday. We're willing to give the Bears a small pass in that 61-38 loss (we said a small pass) because the Blue Hens did a very nice job concealing the status of their QB rotation. Normal-starter Nick Minicucci had missed the previous three games with a knee injury and head coach Ryan Carty did not leave many hints that Minicucci was going to be cleared last week. He was certainly much healthier than led to believe as Delaware scored 61 points and didn't have to punt in last week's win over the Bears. For what it's worth, that was a tie game midway through the third quarter before the flood gates opened in Delaware's favor. Missouri State QB Henry Belin IV went 26-of-35 for 337 yards with two touchdowns and two interceptions. The Bears' offense generated 7.4 yards per play, but three turnovers and 12 penalties for 100 yards became a little too much to overcome. Unfortunately, we don't have one of those passes handy for Sam Houston at the moment. The Bearkats are 0-4 straight-up and against the spread over their last four contests. Remember, Sam Houston was nearly leading Texas Tech at halftime at the end of September but QB Landyn Locke threw a pair of pick-sixes. In the 14 quarters since then, Sam Houston has been out-scored by a combined margin of 109-30. In our opinion, this is another nice buy-low spot on the Bearkats' total train. Belin IV wasn't Missouri State's opening day starter, but he's thrown for 300+ yards in back-to-back games. The Bears' offense has a lot more bite with him at the helm.
Play the Over
| Sam Houston St | 10 / 27 | -17 | 46 | 40 | +5.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Missouri State | 25 / 38.7 | -13.7 | 46 | 44 | +1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Sam Houston St | 10-21 | New Mexic. | +3 | 47 | 24-30 | Missouri State | 10-20 | @ Delaware | +3 | 54.5 | 38-61 |
| | 10-14 | Western K. | PK | 53.5 | 3-16 | | 10-14 | Kennesaw . | +2.5 | 53 | 24-21 |
| | 10-08 | @ Liberty | +13.5 | 52.5 | 3-35 | | 10-08 | @ Western K. | -2 | 56.5 | 13-34 |
| Sam Houston St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-6 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Troy | 15.5 | W | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 9.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Tulsa | 12.5 | W | 17-23 | UN | 51.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | W | 14-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Nicholls State | -21 | W | 59-0 | OV | 51 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Texas Tech | 34.5 | L | 14-49 | OV | 55.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 14-21 | OV | 31 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Liberty | 13.5 | L | 3-35 | UN | 52.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27 |
| 10-14-26 | Western Kentucky | 0 | L | 3-16 | UN | 53.5 | 0 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 0 | L | 3-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-21-26 | New Mexico State | 3 | L | 24-30 | OV | 47 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 1 | L | 10-14 | OV | 23 |
| 10-27-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Missouri State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Texas A&M | 38.5 | L | 0-50 | UN | 53.5 | 10.5 | W | 0-9 | UN | 14 | 24.5 | W | 0-19 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Lindenwood | -16.5 | W | 48-14 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Marshall | 4 | L | 24-30 | OV | 52.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ SMU | 30.5 | W | 24-34 | UN | 59.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 14.5 | 19.5 | W | 10-14 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Western Kentucky | -2 | L | 13-34 | UN | 56.5 | 0 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-21 | UN | 28 |
| 10-14-26 | Kennesaw State | 2.5 | W | 24-21 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 6-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-20-26 | @ Delaware | 3 | L | 38-61 | OV | 54.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 1.5 | W | 28-24 | OV | 27 |
| 10-27-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 28th
| Kennesaw State | 23 | -1 | 45 | -1.5 | 43 | 32 | 1-3 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 1-3 / 0-3 | +1 / -13 | -4.5 / +13 |
| Middle Tenn St | 20 | 49.5 | 47.5(1) | | 47 | 40 | 3-0 / 1-3 | 3-0 / 2-2 | 1-2 / 2-2 | +11.3 / -16 | -6 / +12.5 |
The home team has won-and-covered each of the first two meetings since Kennesaw joined Conference-USA. Middle Tennessee earned a 14-5 home win in October 2024, and the Owls returned the favor with an eight-point home win last season. Middle Tennessee out-gained Kennesaw by 126 yards and held a 24-17 advantage in first downs, but couldn't dig out of a 21-3 hole that was created in the first quarter. The Blue Raiders had two extra days to prep for this one after beating Florida International last Tuesday. MTSU is still in the Conference-USA mix after back-to-back upset wins over Delaware and FIU. Terrence Brown Jr. ran for 158 yards and a touchdown on 18 carries in last week's win over the Panthers. The Blue Raiders' last three games have all gone over the total. Kennesaw is still searching for its first win over an FBS-level opponent. After beating West Georgia in the opener, the Owls have dropped their last six games with a handful of them coming in late, heartbreaking fashion. Last week's loss to Liberty, however, was not one of them. The Flames out-gained the Owls by over 100 yards with a +2.1 yards per play differential. That game was played last Thursday, so as we mentioned, Middle Tennessee has a two-day rest advantage heading into this one. There are spots to back Middle Tennessee, but home favorite isn't one of them. The Blue Raiders haven't closed as a home favorite against an FBS-level opponent since beating 2-10 Sam Houston last season. Kennesaw lost three coinflips against Arkansas State, Jacksonville State and Missouri State. At some point, one of these is going to turn in the Owls' favor.
Play Kennesaw State
| Kennesaw State | 17.7 / 28.3 | -10.7 | 43 | 39 | +3 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Middle Tenn St | 19.7 / 36 | -16.3 | 47 | 37 | +11 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Kennesaw State | 10-22 | Liberty | +8 | 50 | 6-34 | Middle Tenn St | 10-20 | @ Florida I. | +10 | 46.5 | 26-23 |
| | 10-14 | @ Missouri . | -2.5 | 53 | 21-24 | | 10-13 | Delaware | +1 | 49.5 | 33-30 |
| | 10-07 | Jacksonvi. | +3 | 48.5 | 26-27 | | 10-03 | @ Kansas | +21.5 | 51 | 0-55 |
|
| 09-27-25 | Middle Tenn St | 16 | 53.5 | 25 | 37/155 | 28/42/1/285 | 2/1 |
| Kennesaw State | 24 | -6.5 | 17 | 29/176 | 13/20/0/177 | 2/1 |
| Kennesaw State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-6 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-03-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -21.5 | W | 47-0 | UN | 50.5 | 0 | W | 19-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 40-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia State | -7.5 | L | 17-31 | UN | 55.5 | -2.5 | L | 3-6 | UN | 12.5 | -4.5 | L | 3-21 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Tennessee U | 35 | W | 9-42 | UN | 60 | 9.5 | L | 3-15 | OV | 14.5 | 21.5 | W | 3-21 | UN | 34 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Arkansas St | 6.5 | W | 14-17 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-07-26 | Jacksonville St | 3 | W | 26-27 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | W | 16-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-14-26 | @ Missouri State | -2.5 | L | 21-24 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-6 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-22-26 | Liberty | 8 | L | 6-34 | UN | 50 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 5.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Middle Tenn St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:1-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Murray State | -22.5 | W | 38-14 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Marshall | 11.5 | W | 26-28 | UN | 56 | 5.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | W | 13-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Nevada | 3.5 | W | 27-20 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 7 | L | 13-23 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Kansas | 21.5 | L | 0-55 | OV | 51 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 11.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 26 |
| 10-13-26 | Delaware | 1 | W | 33-30 | OV | 49.5 | 0.5 | W | 5-3 | UN | 9.5 | 0 | L | 12-16 | OV | 24 |
| 10-20-26 | @ Florida Intl | 10 | W | 26-23 | OV | 46.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-8 | OV | 7.5 | 6.5 | W | 13-8 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-28-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Jacksonville St | 27 | -3 | 35.5 | -7.5 | 37 | 41 | 4-0 / 1-2 | 3-0-1 / 0-3 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +14.8 / -9 | -9 / +1.5 |
| New Mexico State | 21 | 50 | 45(2) | | 46 | 49 | 2-1 / 1-3 | 2-1 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 1-3 | +11.3 / -10 | -6.5 / +10.5 |
The home team has won-and-covered each of the first two meetings since Jacksonville State made the jump to join Conference-USA with New Mexico State, but the Aggies and Gamecocks did not meet last season. Jacksonville State is coming off its bye week, and it probably came at a good time for the Gamecocks after a series of nailbiters. The Gamecocks are 4-1 straight-up, 3-2 against the spread over their last five games, but the average margin in those contests was 4.0 points per game. During that stretch, Jacksonville State was involved in a one-point win, a two-point loss, a three-point win and a four-point win. Five of the Gamecocks' last six games have gone over the total. New Mexico State returns home after splitting a pair of road games at Florida International (loss) and Sam Houston (win). Because of such low margins of victory in Jacksonville State games, we're a little gunshy to pull the trigger, but we can only look in the Gamecocks' direction. New Mexico State caught a handful of teams in ideal situations over the first few weeks of the season. The Aggies played Florida State in Week 0 when the Seminoles clearly weren't fully-organized. They were the fourth road game in five weeks on Western Kentucky's schedule when the Hilltoppers had nothing in the tank. That Week 2 loss at Hawaii hasn't aged very well considering the Warriors have been dreadful this season. Jacksonville State's style of play doesn't typically generate high-scoring wins, but we're not seeing much on New Mexico State's profile to suggest the Aggies can pull the upset. We have this game lined closer to a touchdown.
Play Jacksonville State
| Jacksonville St | 25.7 / 21 | +4.7 | 37 | 44 | -4.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-0-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| New Mexico State | 22.3 / 19.7 | +2.7 | 45 | 44 | +0.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Jacksonville St | 10-13 | Florida I. | -3 | 44 | 27-24 | New Mexico State | 10-21 | @ Sam Houst. | -3 | 47 | 30-24 |
| | 10-07 | @ Kennesaw . | -3 | 48.5 | 27-26 | | 10-07 | @ Florida I. | +7 | 47 | 3-22 |
| | 09-26 | Middle Te. | -7 | 50.5 | 23-13 | | 10-01 | Western K. | -2 | 56 | 34-13 |
| Jacksonville St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ North Dakota State | 6.5 | L | 7-33 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 3.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Eastern Kentucky | -22.5 | W | 49-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Ohio | 1.5 | L | 27-29 | OV | 49 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10 | 0.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia Southern | -3.5 | W | 31-27 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Middle Tenn St | -7 | W | 23-13 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-07-26 | @ Kennesaw State | -3 | L | 27-26 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | -1.5 | L | 14-16 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-13-26 | Florida Intl | -3 | PK | 27-24 | OV | 44 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 17-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-28-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Mexico State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Florida State | 31 | W | 17-34 | UN | 53.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 18.5 | W | 7-17 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Mercyhurst | -29 | W | 51-14 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 13-7 | OV | | | W | 23-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Hawaii | 7.5 | L | 19-29 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-9 | UN | 10 | 4 | L | 13-19 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | New Mexico | 11.5 | L | 18-42 | OV | 47.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 3-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-01-26 | Western Kentucky | -2 | W | 34-13 | UN | 56 | -0.5 | W | 6-3 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-6 | UN | 28 |
| 10-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | 7 | L | 3-22 | UN | 47 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 4 | L | 3-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | -3 | W | 30-24 | OV | 47 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -1 | W | 14-10 | OV | 23 |
| 10-28-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 29th
| Troy | 13 | 52 | 39.5 | | 39 | 53 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 1-3 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 0-3 | +8.5 / -16 | -15.5 / +11 |
| James Madison | 31 | -17.5 | 30(3) | -12.5 | 28 | 39 | 4-0 / 3-1 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 2-2 | +36.5 / +9.8 | -19 / -5.5 |
These teams have only met once in the regular season since James Madison joined the Sun Belt (2023), but the Dukes took down Troy in last year's conference championship game. Troy easily stayed within the number as a 24.5-point 'dog, and that was only a 17-14 game with five minutes remaining before the Dukes scored a pair of late touchdowns to make the 31-14 final score look a lot more appealing. Nonetheless, JMU's defense still held Troy to 177 total yards on 2.6 yards per play in that contest. Both teams are coming off losses last week. James Madison has a couple extra days to rest and prep for this one after losing their first game of the season at App State last Thursday. The Dukes scored on their first drive of the game and they held a lead for most of the first three quarters before the Mountaineers turned things around in the fourth quarter. JC Evans and Camden Coleman split time at quarterback and both enjoyed success through the air, but the Dukes couldn't get anything going on the ground. A big reason for that was an injury suffered by running back George Pettaway, and he is not expected to return for this one. Troy is looking to snap its two-game losing skid, and the Trojans have left fans wondering who this team is over the last three weeks. Troy scored 55 points with over 650 total yards at home against Southern Miss. In the two games since that win, the Trojans produced a total of 20 points and 467 yards against Louisiana and UL-Monroe. Goose Crowder and Tucker Kilcrease split time at quarterback against the WarHawks, combining to go 9-of-18 through the air for 47 passing yards against one of the worst teams in the country. With Pettaway likely out of the lineup and Troy unable to move the ball the last two weeks, we can only look toward the under. The last two meetings between these teams saw 45 and 30 points, and like we mentioned, JMU needed two late touchdowns to simply reach those numbers. Any reason to believe this contest turns into a high-scoring affair? Troy scored 17 points against Missouri, ten points against Utah State and six points against Louisiana. That's not going to be enough to push this final score over the total.
Play the Under
10/26 1:46 PM PDT — James Madison running back George Pettaway is not expected to play in this contest. Pettaway was injured in last week's loss to App State. He is averaging 6.6 yards per carry this season with eight rushing touchdowns.
| Troy | 25 / 29.3 | -4.3 | 38 | 46 | -6.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| James Madison | 35.7 / 26.7 | +9 | 26 | 40 | -9 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Troy | 10-24 | UL Monroe | -13 | 51.5 | 14-21 | James Madison | 10-22 | @ Appalachi. | -11.5 | 57 | 31-34 |
| | 10-17 | @ Louisiana | +3 | 49.5 | 6-33 | | 10-17 | Georgia S. | -8 | 58 | 49-22 |
| | 10-06 | So Missis. | -9.5 | 51.5 | 55-34 | | 10-10 | @ Georgia S. | -7 | 51.5 | 27-24 |
|
| 12-05-25 | Troy | 14 | 47 | 12 | 28/-26 | 16/39/0/203 | 1/1 |
| James Madison | 31 | -24.5 | 19 | 42/318 | 10/25/1/93 | 1/1 |
| Troy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Sam Houston St | -15.5 | L | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama St | -23.5 | L | 34-17 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri | 26.5 | W | 17-27 | UN | 49.5 | 7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 15 | W | 17-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Utah State | 3 | L | 10-21 | UN | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-06-26 | So Mississippi | -9.5 | W | 55-34 | OV | 51.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Louisiana | 3 | L | 6-33 | UN | 49.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-19 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | UL Monroe | -13 | L | 14-21 | UN | 51.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | L | 7-3 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-29-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| James Madison |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:7-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:7-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Liberty | -6 | W | 20-13 | UN | 51 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wagner | -46.5 | W | 87-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 42-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Diego State | 3 | W | 26-13 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 19-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Old Dominion | -7 | W | 46-20 | OV | 44 | -0.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | W | 30-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Marshall | -14.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 55.5 | -5.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -9 | W | 38-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Southern | -7 | L | 27-24 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 6-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia State | -8 | W | 49-22 | OV | 58 | -3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -6 | W | 35-10 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-22-26 | @ Appalachian St | -11.5 | L | 31-34 | OV | 57 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | L | 14-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-29-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida Atlantic | 31 | 78.5 | 39 | | 37 | 47 | 4-0 / 1-2 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 3-1 / 3-0 | +18 / -16.3 | -14 / +5 |
| North Texas | 38 | -15.5 | 31.5(2) | -9.5 | 34 | 33 | 3-0 / 2-2 | 3-0 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 4-0 | +42.3 / -9.8 | -21 / +9.5 |
North Texas has won each of the last three meetings, but the Mean Green and Owls did not play last season. The winning team has scored 40+ points in each of the last five meetings (4-1 to the over). The defensive backs on both sides wouldn't mind some work this week because both teams are coming off wins over triple-option rushing attacks. North Texas escaped Annapolis with a 49-39 win over Navy. The Mean Green are 4-0 straight-up, 3-1 against the spread since losing at Texas State in mid-September. North Texas' last five games have all gone over the total. Florida Atlantic got back in the win column with a 51-49 home win over Rice, but it certainly wasn't pretty. Over the last two weeks against Army and Rice, the Owls have allowed a total of 105 points and 978 rushing yards. Florida Atlantic gets a SMALL pass for last week after Rice made a late QB switch from Jacurri Brown to Gael Ochoa. Rice fans are now wondering why that move wasn't made sooner because Ochoa produced 259 rushing yards and four touchdowns on just 12 carries against FAU's defense. So Florida Atlantic probably didn't have a great scouting report on Ochoa, but other than that, the Owls' defensive performance over the last few weeks leaves a lot to be desired. With all of that said, we still have some mild interest in the Owls at this near-two-touchdown spread. Zach Kittley and the FAU coaching staff clearly have some things to work on as it pertains to defending the triple-option, but how much can you realistically take from some of those results? For all intents and purposes, there are five teams in the country that run the triple option and FAU had to play three of them within a six-week span. If the wheels come off once again, then we'll be forced to give the Owls a stiff downgrade. But they deserve a clean shot against a program that was viewed to be on the same level as them heading into the season. Heck, Florida Atlantic had a higher regular season win total than North Texas at DraftKings entering the year. Neal Brown has done a great job in Denton thus far, but the talent gap between these two teams shouldn't be two touchdowns.
Play Florida Atlantic
| Florida Atlantic | 47 / 38.3 | +8.7 | 36 | 44 | -18 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| North Texas | 48 / 31 | +17 | 34 | 40 | -11 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Florida Atlantic | 10-24 | Rice | -9 | 55 | 51-49 | North Texas | 10-24 | @ Navy | -3 | 60 | 49-39 |
| | 10-17 | @ Army | +2 | 55.5 | 24-56 | | 10-10 | Charlotte | -27.5 | 58 | 50-10 |
| | 10-03 | Texas Sou. | -47 | 62.5 | 66-10 | | 10-01 | @ Tulsa | -3 | 57 | 45-44 |
| Florida Atlantic |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:2-3-1 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Florida | 25.5 | L | 21-66 | OV | 59.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | L | 14-38 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Navy | 4.5 | W | 38-30 | OV | 59.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | 3 | W | 31-7 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida Intl | -5 | W | 16-10 | UN | 62.5 | -1.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | PK | 10-7 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ UL Monroe | -12 | W | 45-17 | OV | 58 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | W | 35-17 | OV | 29 |
| 10-03-26 | Texas Southern | -47 | W | 66-10 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 28-3 | OV | | | W | 49-10 | OV | |
| 10-17-26 | @ Army | 2 | L | 24-56 | OV | 55.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 14-35 | OV | 27 |
| 10-24-26 | Rice | -9 | L | 51-49 | OV | 55 | -2.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -6 | L | 23-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-29-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-2-1 , O/U:2-2-2 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Indiana | 40 | W | 16-52 | OV | 57.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-14 | P | 14 | 24 | W | 6-24 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | UNLV | 3 | W | 44-6 | UN | 58.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-0 | P | 13 | 1.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas State | 3 | L | 35-49 | OV | 62.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 13.5 | 2 | W | 28-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Houston Baptist | -39 | W | 63-14 | OV | 60 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 35-14 | OV | |
| 10-01-26 | @ Tulsa | -3 | L | 45-44 | OV | 57 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | Charlotte | -27.5 | W | 50-10 | OV | 58 | -7 | PK | 10-3 | UN | 13.5 | -17 | W | 40-10 | OV | 31 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Navy | -3 | W | 49-39 | OV | 60 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -0.5 | W | 28-17 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-29-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 30th
| Tulane | 34 | -7.5 | 36 | -11 | 34 | 28 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 1-3 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 1-2 | -0.5 / -9.3 | -4.5 / +12 |
| Charlotte | 13 | 47 | 48(1) | | 50 | 37 | 0-3 / 1-3 | 0-3 / 3-1 | 2-1 / 2-2 | -26.7 / -17.5 | +2.5 / +26.5 |
Tulane has won each of the last two meetings by a combined margin of 61-3. The 49ers failed to hit the 200-yard mark in either of those contests, including just 140 total yards in last year's 27-0 loss in New Orleans. Charlotte is coming off a bye after previously earning its first win of the season against Temple. The 49ers snapped their 16-game losing streak against FBS-level competition with a 38-31 win over the Owls in Philadelphia as a 17.5-point 'dog. There was nothing fluke-y about that result. QB Conner Harrell went 23-of-31 through the air with 281 passing yards, four touchdowns and no interceptions. Running back Henry Rutledge ran for 123 yards on 17 carries. Four different receivers finished with 50+ yards, led by Derrick Eley's six catches for 96 yards. Tulane is licking its wounds after getting crushed at home by UTSA on Saturday. The 42 points that UTSA scored is the most the Green Wave have allowed since....UTSA scored 48 against them last year. So Tulane is happy to be done with the RoadRunners for a while. The Green Wave turned the ball over six times last week - Four lost fumbles and two interceptions by QB Trace Johnson. Charlotte is going to need to put a couple more performances together before we can trust the 49ers. It's been almost two full calendar years since Charlotte won back-to-back games, so you'll have to forgive us if we're not ready to jump on the Niners' bandwagon just yet. Tulane has clearly taken a step back from previous editions of The Green Wave, but this is an opponent that Tulane should handle with relative ease.
Play Tulane
| Tulane | 22.3 / 26.3 | -4 | 34 | 28 | +5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Charlotte | 18.7 / 46.7 | -28 | 52 | 33 | +21 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Tulane | 10-24 | Tex San A. | +3 | 51.5 | 19-42 | Charlotte | 10-17 | @ Temple | +17 | 47 | 38-31 |
| | 10-16 | Memphis | +6.5 | 55.5 | 31-17 | | 10-10 | @ North Tex. | +27.5 | 58 | 10-50 |
| | 10-10 | @ Army | +5.5 | 49 | 17-20 | | 10-03 | Memphis | +18.5 | 52 | 8-59 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Charlotte | 0 | 52 | 7 | 21/-3 | 20/28/2/143 | 1/0 |
| Tulane | 27 | -31.5 | 25 | 35/151 | 29/39/2/312 | 4/1 |
| Tulane |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:1-5-1 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-2-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Duke | 9.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 51.5 | 3 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | South Alabama | -10 | L | 28-24 | OV | 48 | -3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | -6.5 | L | 14-10 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas State | 20.5 | W | 20-31 | OV | 50 | 5.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | So Mississippi | -18 | L | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -5.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -10 | L | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Army | 5.5 | W | 17-20 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-16-26 | Memphis | 6.5 | W | 31-17 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | W | 23-10 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | Tex San Antonio | 3 | L | 19-42 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 13-21 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-30-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Charlotte |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-6 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:0-5 , PSR:3-2-1 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:1-6 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:1-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Citadel | -20.5 | L | 41-43 | OV | 49 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Mississippi | 44 | W | 9-41 | UN | 59.5 | 13.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14.5 | 27.5 | W | 0-27 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Appalachian St | 16.5 | W | 21-26 | UN | 52.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-13 | UN | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Louisiana | 9 | L | 7-34 | UN | 49 | 2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 5.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Memphis | 18.5 | L | 8-59 | OV | 52 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ North Texas | 27.5 | L | 10-50 | OV | 58 | 7 | PK | 3-10 | UN | 13.5 | 17 | L | 10-40 | OV | 31 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Temple | 17 | W | 38-31 | OV | 47 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 10 | W | 7-14 | UN | 24 |
| 10-30-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Baylor | 23 | -2.5 | 21.5 | -1.5 | 21 | 24 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 2-2 / 1-0-1 | 1-3 / 1-1 | +14.3 / +17.5 | -17.5 / +2 |
| Central Florida | 20 | 49.5 | 26(3) | | 27 | 14 | 4-0 / 0-3 | 3-1 / 1-1-1 | 3-1 / 1-2 | +24.3 / -9.7 | -12.5 / +9 |
Baylor has won-and-covered each of the two meetings since the Knights joined the Big XII. The Bears earned a 30-3 home win as a 2.5-point favorite last season, out-gaining UCF by nearly 200 yards in a dominant effort. Vibes couldn't be any more different between these teams at the moment, as UCF is coming off a signature top-10 upset while Baylor fired its coach last week. Dave Aranda failed to make it through his seventh season in Waco as the Bears will turn to first-year defensive coordinator Joe Klanderman as the interim head coach. Klanderman has never served as a head coach before, but he brings a strong pedigree to the position after plenty of time spent at Kansas State and North Dakota State under Chris Klieman. The Bears are looking to snap a two-game losing skid after dropping back-to-back games against TCU and Kansas. On the UCF side, the Knights are looking to avoid a letdown spot after last week's overtime win over BYU. The Bounce House showed why it's one of the best atmospheres in college football, helping UCF past former-No. 2 BYU last week. All indications suggest that former-starter Alonza Barnett has been cleared to return from a hamstring injury that kept him out for several weeks, but UCF head coach Scott Frost said that the Knights are going to stick with Keyone Jenkins at quarterback for the foreseeable future. Dating back to the end of last season, the under is 7-2 in Baylor's last nine games and that is the direction we'd prefer to look in this one. Klanderman comes from the defensive side of the ball, so there should be no changes for Baylor in that department. Say what you want about Aranda, but the Bears' defense held Auburn, Louisiana Tech, Colorado, Arizona State and TCU below 20 points. That side of the ball hasn't really been the problem in 2026.
Play the Under
| Baylor | 28.3 / 20.3 | +8 | 21 | 22 | 0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-0-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Central Florida | 28 / 33.3 | -5.3 | 27 | 18 | +9 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Baylor | 10-24 | @ Kansas | +1 | 54.5 | 24-25 | Central Florida | 10-24 | BYU | +7.5 | 44 | 39-31 |
| | 10-17 | TCU | -3.5 | 50.5 | 6-17 | | 10-10 | @ Oklahoma . | +10 | 53.5 | 28-42 |
| | 10-03 | @ Arizona S. | +3 | 49.5 | 55-19 | | 10-03 | @ Houston U | +10 | 50 | 17-27 |
|
| 11-01-25 | Central Florida | 3 | 58 | 13 | 23/74 | 18/33/2/151 | 0/0 |
| Baylor | 30 | -3 | 24 | 39/150 | 29/40/0/267 | 1/1 |
| Baylor |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-2-1 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Auburn | 6.5 | W | 16-17 | UN | 58.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Prairie View A&M | -37.5 | W | 44-3 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 34-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Louisiana Tech | -20.5 | L | 36-19 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -11.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado | -8 | W | 23-13 | UN | 54.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6 | W | 10-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona State | 3 | W | 55-19 | OV | 49.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | W | 24-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | TCU | -3.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 6-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kansas | 1 | PK | 24-25 | UN | 54.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | 7-7 | UN | 27 |
| 10-30-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Central Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-2-1 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-1-1 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-2-1 |
| 09-03-26 | Bethune Cookman | -43.5 | W | 73-6 | OV | 58.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 38-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 7 | W | 7-12 | UN | 55 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 13 | 4.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia State | -17.5 | L | 44-30 | OV | 50.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 20-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | TCU | 3.5 | W | 21-13 | UN | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2 | W | 14-10 | P | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Houston U | 10 | PK | 17-27 | UN | 50 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma State | 10 | L | 28-42 | OV | 53.5 | 2.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | BYU | 7.5 | W | 39-31 | OV | 44 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 4 | W | 17-14 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-30-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kent State | 34 | -7 | 50 | -6 | 49 | 54 | 3-1 / 0-4 | 4-0 / 0-4 | 2-2 / 3-1 | +11.5 / -42.8 | -3 / +30.5 |
| Sacramento State | 17 | 47.5 | 57(1) | | 54 | 47 | 1-3 / 0-4 | 2-2 / 0-4 | 1-3 / 2-1 | -9.8 / -25.5 | +2.5 / +12.5 |
Kent State broke its three-game losing skid with a 35-20 home win over Akron last week. The Zips out-gained the Flashes by 46 yards and held a 26-21 advantage in first downs, but Kent State played the much-cleaner game. The Flashes finished +1 in turnover margin, only committed three penalties in the game and QB Dru DeShields was not sacked. Sacramento State is 0-7 straight-up, 1-6 against the spread against FBS-level competition this season. The Hornets' only point spread cover came against North Dakota State in a game that the Bison led 28-0 after 19 minutes then essentially stopped playing after that. Sacramento State was held to 17 points, 266 total yards and 16 first downs on 4.6 yards per play last week against Ball State, who probably has a bottom-15 defense in the country. We have some mild interest in Kent State's team total, which has opened at 28.5 (-110) at DraftKings on Tuesday. Sacramento State's last six opponents have scored an average of 39.2 points per game against the Hornets and all six of those teams cleared this 28.5-point mark (with relative ease). The Flashes' offense was overwhelmed by superior competition like South Carolina, Ohio State and South Florida, but DeShields is capable of lighting up the scoreboard against comparable competition. Kent State scored 42 points against both Akron and UMass last season, then 35 at Northern Illinois. Between last week against the Zips and this week against the Hornets, Kent State can't ask for a better opportunity to stretch its legs and have some fun.
Play Kent State Team Total Over 28.5
| Kent State | 14.7 / 29 | -14.3 | 49 | 41 | +10.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Sacramento State | 11.3 / 40 | -28.7 | 56 | 44 | +14 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Kent State | 10-24 | Akron | -3 | 48 | 35-20 | Sacramento State | 10-24 | @ Ball State | +14.5 | 51 | 17-34 |
| | 10-17 | @ South Flo. | +20.5 | 45.5 | 2-29 | | 10-17 | Ohio | +18 | 45.5 | 7-48 |
| | 10-10 | @ Western M. | +14 | 43.5 | 7-38 | | 10-10 | @ Bowling G. | +9 | 43.5 | 10-38 |
| Kent State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:1-6 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:1-6-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ South Carolina | 35.5 | L | 0-57 | OV | 53 | 9.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 21 | L | 0-29 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wofford | -10 | W | 36-15 | OV | 46 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | L | 14-15 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Ohio State | 52 | L | 3-59 | OV | 58.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14.5 | 31.5 | L | 0-35 | UN | 35.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Ball State | -2.5 | W | 26-13 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1 | W | 17-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio | 3.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Western Michigan | 14 | L | 7-38 | OV | 43.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 7 | L | 7-21 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ South Florida | 20.5 | L | 2-29 | UN | 45.5 | 6.5 | W | 2-0 | UN | 9.5 | 11.5 | W | 2-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Akron | -3 | W | 35-20 | OV | 48 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-30-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sacramento State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-7 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:3-4-1 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:1-7 , PSR:0-7 , O/U:6-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 8.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 53 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Miss Valley State | -38.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Fresno State | 17.5 | L | 3-49 | OV | 43.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-32 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Dakota State | 24.5 | W | 10-31 | UN | 50.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 10.5 | 14.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Massachusetts | 6 | L | 6-35 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 6-21 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | 9 | L | 10-38 | OV | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6 | L | 3-17 | UN | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio | 18 | L | 7-48 | OV | 45.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 9.5 | L | 0-27 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Ball State | 14.5 | L | 17-34 | P | 51 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 10-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-30-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 31st
| Army | 24 | 59 | 31.5 | | 30 | 33 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +21.8 / +1.7 | -12 / -1.5 |
| Memphis | 27 | -6 | 26(2) | -7.5 | 26 | 36 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 2-2 | +18.5 / +6.3 | -17.5 / -3 |
This is the first meeting between Memphis and Army since the Knights joined The American Conference. Army and Memphis have not shared the field since the Tigers swept a four-game series from 1999-2002. It certainly hasn't been pretty at times, but Army has quietly climbed to 4-1 in conference play, and for all intents and purposes, the winner of this game will likely be sitting in third place in the league behind unbeaten UTSA and North Texas. The Knights have earned three-straight wins over Tulane, Florida Atlantic and Tulsa. While Memphis doesn't have recent experience against Army, the Tigers do have recent experience against Navy and those results haven't been pretty. Memphis has lost as a favorite against the Midshipmen each of the last two seasons, including a 12-point loss as a 9.5-point favorite in 2024. Can a new coaching staff change that fortune? We have our concerns. The Tigers' defense allowed Boise State to rush for 357 yards in Memphis' marquee non-conference game against the Broncos in Week 2. Memphis went to overtime as a 10.5-point home favorite against East Carolina last week, which is not what you want to deal with before trying to prepare for a military academy. That game against the Pirates featured 157 total plays between the teams. Also, the Tigers' bye was in mid-September so Memphis hasn't had a week off to help with prep for this matchup. We still have doubts that Army can be a legit contender in The American Conference, but we can only look in the Knights' direction on Saturday.
Play Army
| Army | 38 / 25.3 | +12.7 | 30 | 34 | -3 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Memphis | 32 / 26 | +6 | 27 | 37 | -10.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Army | 10-23 | @ Tulsa | -1 | 53 | 38-35 | Memphis | 10-22 | East Caro. | -10 | 55 | 41-34 |
| | 10-17 | Florida A. | -2 | 55.5 | 56-24 | | 10-16 | @ Tulane | -6.5 | 55.5 | 17-31 |
| | 10-10 | Tulane | -5.5 | 49 | 20-17 | | 10-10 | UAB | -15 | 55 | 38-13 |
| Army |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Bryant | -37 | W | 59-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 31-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | South Florida | -3 | L | 24-28 | OV | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 23 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Temple | -3.5 | W | 21-17 | UN | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | 0 | L | 29-31 | OV | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | L | 7-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Tulane | -5.5 | L | 20-17 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Florida Atlantic | -2 | W | 56-24 | OV | 55.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 35-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Tulsa | -1 | W | 38-35 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 20-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Memphis |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ UNLV | 4.5 | W | 27-21 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13 | 3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 28 |
| 09-05-26 | Arkansas St | -10.5 | W | 42-24 | OV | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 21-17 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Boise State | 9.5 | L | 20-38 | OV | 55 | 3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | 6 | W | 20-17 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tenn Martin | -33.5 | L | 45-21 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 24-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Charlotte | -18.5 | W | 59-8 | OV | 52 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -10.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | UAB | -15 | W | 38-13 | UN | 55 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -8.5 | L | 10-13 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-16-26 | @ Tulane | -6.5 | L | 17-31 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-23 | OV | 28 |
| 10-22-26 | East Carolina | -10 | L | 41-34 | OV | 55 | -2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 12.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-16 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Marshall | 27 | -3 | 41.5 | -5.5 | 41 | 41 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 2-1 | +1 / -22.3 | -10 / +11 |
| Old Dominion | 20 | 45.5 | 48(1) | | 41 | 35 | 1-3 / 1-3 | 0-4 / 1-3 | 1-3 / 2-2 | -4 / -18.5 | -8.5 / +10.5 |
Marshall has won each of the last eight meetings in this Sun Belt matchup, including a 48-24 outright upset last year as a 14.5-point 'dog. Each of the last three meetings have flown over the total as those contests have seen an average of 75.0 points per game. Marshall is coming off a kinda-sorta bye after beating South Alabama last Tuesday. That was a fantastic defensive effort from The Herd considering the Jaguars scored 50+ points in each of their previous two games. The wheels have fallen off the Monarchs' train in recent weeks as Old Dominion is 1-6 straight-up and against the spread against FBS-level competition this season. ODU is coming off a 26-0 shut-out loss at Louisiana Tech last week. The Monarchs have tried a handful of quarterbacks this season, and Jaxon Potter got the nod last week. Potter went 18-of-34 for 154 yards with one interception last week against the Bulldogs. Our power ratings are in line with where this game has opened, but we can only look in Marshall's direction. The Herd have some Jekyll and Hyde tendencies (i.e. only beating Gardner-Webb as a 24.5-point favorite), but we need to see any signs of life from the Monarchs before we can feel comfortable with a wager on Old Dominion.
Play Marshall
| Marshall | 19.3 / 28.3 | -9 | 43 | 37 | +4 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Old Dominion | 8.3 / 17.3 | -9 | 42 | 37 | +8.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Marshall | 10-20 | South Ala. | +2 | 66.5 | 20-13 | Old Dominion | 10-24 | @ Louisiana. | +13.5 | 44 | 0-26 |
| | 10-10 | Coastal C. | -4.5 | 58 | 21-27 | | 10-15 | Georgia S. | +3 | 45 | 15-23 |
| | 10-03 | @ James Mad. | +14.5 | 55.5 | 17-45 | | 10-10 | @ Appalachi. | +9 | 46 | 10-3 |
|
| 10-11-25 | Old Dominion | 24 | -14.5 | 15 | 38/173 | 15/28/2/266 | 4/3 |
| Marshall | 48 | 57 | 22 | 50/223 | 18/26/0/222 | 0/0 |
| 11-23-24 | Marshall | 42 | 51 | 21 | 41/261 | 13/24/0/210 | 0/0 |
| Old Dominion | 35 | -3 | 24 | 46/286 | 19/31/1/227 | 4/1 |
| Marshall |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Penn State | 23 | L | 0-45 | UN | 53.5 | 7 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Middle Tenn St | -11.5 | L | 28-26 | UN | 56 | -5.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | L | 14-13 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri State | -4 | W | 30-24 | OV | 52.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Gardner Webb | -25 | L | 36-35 | OV | 56 | | L | 10-14 | OV | | | W | 27-21 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ James Madison | 14.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 55.5 | 5.5 | W | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | 9 | L | 14-38 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Coastal Carolina | -4.5 | L | 21-27 | UN | 58 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | L | 0-13 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-20-26 | South Alabama | 2 | W | 20-13 | UN | 66.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 6-6 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Old Dominion |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-6 , PSR:1-7 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-2-1 |
| 09-05-26 | Norfolk St | -41.5 | L | 31-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 18 | L | 21-44 | OV | 47.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | L | 6-34 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | East Carolina | -2.5 | L | 17-20 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | James Madison | 7 | L | 20-46 | OV | 44 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | L | 17-30 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia State | 1 | L | 10-42 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Appalachian St | 9 | W | 10-3 | UN | 46 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6 | W | 0-0 | UN | 23 |
| 10-15-26 | Georgia Southern | 3 | L | 15-23 | UN | 45 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-16 | P | 23 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | 13.5 | L | 0-26 | UN | 44 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 0-17 | UN | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| California | 27 | 56.5 | 29 | | 26 | 16 | 2-3 / 1-2 | 1-4 / 1-2 | 1-4 / 2-1 | -4.4 / -14.7 | -6.5 / +7.5 |
| NC State | 28 | -9.5 | 22.5(2) | -8.5 | 22 | 33 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 0-3 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +15.5 / -11 | -9.5 / -0 |
NC State fired longtime head coach Dave Doeren after last week's loss in Stanford. After 14 seasons in Raleigh, Doeren was one of the longest-tenured Power 4 coaches in the country at one school. The Wolfpack roster apparently didn't take the news very well and there were some emotional reactions. Starting QB CJ Bailey said, "It was kind of a shocker to me, thinking that it wouldn't happen during the season. It was like unbelievable to me." NC State doesn't feel like the kind of team that's going to see a positive bounce after having its coach dismissed. Heck, we'd argue that Doeren actually deserves some kudos for keeping the team together after the shocking collapse against Vanderbilt in Week 3. Plenty of other teams would have folded after that, but the Wolfpack went out and beat App State and Louisville over the next two weeks. There are already rumors swirling about players that may be looking to preserve their health for future opportunities. The NC State marketing and social media departments didn't do the team many favors this week, curiously electing to put the back-up QB (Will Wilson, who's completed 12 passes in two seasons with the Wolfpack) on the cover of this week's digital program. You don't see that very often. A completely-innocent gesture that the internet is overreacting to? Perhaps. Or perhaps it's a signal of, "We're not completely sure who's actually going to be playing this week so let's pick someone safe on the roster." Things went off the rails in a hurry last week at SMU, but Cal led the Mustangs at halftime before getting out-scored 42-0 in the second half. In a game where the effort level of both teams is going to be questioned, we'll take the seven-point head start.
Play Cal
| California | 17.3 / 40 | -22.7 | 26 | 17 | +13 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| NC State | 24.3 / 32.3 | -8 | 22 | 22 | +0.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| California | 10-24 | @ SMU | +18.5 | 55.5 | 20-59 | NC State | 10-23 | @ Stanford | -7.5 | 55 | 28-31 |
| | 10-17 | Wake Fore. | +10 | 54 | 7-41 | | 10-10 | Wake Fore. | +3.5 | 56 | 14-38 |
| | 10-10 | Virginia . | +11 | 52 | 25-20 | | 10-03 | Louisville | +5 | 56.5 | 31-28 |
| California |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-6 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UCLA | 2.5 | L | 24-45 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Syracuse | 4 | W | 21-18 | UN | 57 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-12 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Wagner | -58.5 | L | 49-7 | UN | 65.5 | | W | 29-0 | OV | | | W | 39-7 | OV | |
| 09-25-26 | Clemson | 2.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 52 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ UNLV | 0 | L | 31-39 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 7-24 | OV | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | Virginia Tech | 11 | W | 25-20 | UN | 52 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-14 | UN | 27 |
| 10-17-26 | Wake Forest | 10 | L | 7-41 | UN | 54 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 6 | L | 0-34 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ SMU | 18.5 | L | 20-59 | OV | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | 10.5 | W | 20-17 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| NC State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:5-1-1 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Virginia | 4 | L | 8-34 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 2.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Richmond | -33.5 | W | 73-0 | OV | 50.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 49-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 3 | L | 31-35 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Appalachian St | -13 | L | 41-31 | OV | 56 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | W | 28-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Louisville | 5 | W | 31-28 | OV | 56.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | W | 13-7 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | Wake Forest | 3.5 | L | 14-38 | UN | 56 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | W | 14-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Stanford | -7.5 | L | 28-31 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 12.5 | -4.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah | 24 | -7 | 12 | -11.5 | 13 | 17 | 5-0 / 2-0 | 5-0 / 1-1 | 2-3 / 2-0 | +28.6 / +8.5 | -20 / -11.5 |
| Cincinnati U | 27 | 56.5 | 25.5(2) | | 26 | 9 | 5-0 / 0-2 | 4-1 / 0-2 | 4-1 / 1-1 | +18.6 / -15 | -8 / +4.5 |
Utah earned a 45-14 home win over Cincinnati last season, even though the Utes only out-gained the Bearcats by 53 yards. Utah was the beneficiary of three Cincinnati turnovers and the Utes returned a punt 75 yards for a touchdown in that contest. The Bearcats finished that game with less than 20 minutes of possession. Both teams are coming off wins last week. Utah's unbeaten season remains intact after the Utes beat Houston at home. Cincinnati earned a much-needed signature win as the Bearcats beat Texas Tech as a 10.5-point home 'dog. Five of Cincinnati's last six games have gone over the total, but we're viewing this as a "sell high" spot in the totals market. Utah entered this season with the benefit of unfamiliarity on its side with a new coaching staff, including former Utah State offensive coordinator Kevin McGiven. The Utes' offense looked like gangbusters at the beginning of the year, scoring 66 points against Idaho and 43 points against Arkansas. But now there is plenty of tape on McGiven's offense and how the Utes are using Devon Dampier and Byrd Ficklin, and opponents are beginning to catch up. Houston intercepted Dampier twice last week as the Utes struggled to find success in the passing game. Even Big XII-worst Colorado had success defending Utah the week prior, holding the Utes to 3.36 yards per carry. Also, as we mentioned in the BYU-Arizona State preview, Utah has the Holy War against the Cougars next week. First-time head coach Morgan Scalley will likely have his hands full, keeping his team focused on the task at hand this week. Our primary play is going to be on the under in this contest, but we certainly wouldn't be shocked if Cincinnati pulled off the outright upset.
Play the Under
| Utah | 29.7 / 20.3 | +9.3 | 12 | 24 | -12 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Cincinnati U | 28.7 / 34.3 | -5.7 | 27 | 19 | +6.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Utah | 10-24 | Houston U | -6 | 57.5 | 21-13 | Cincinnati U | 10-24 | Texas Tech | +11 | 58 | 37-24 |
| | 10-17 | @ Colorado | -15 | 49.5 | 27-24 | | 10-17 | @ West Virg. | +1.5 | 64.5 | 42-45 |
| | 10-10 | Kansas | -15.5 | 49.5 | 41-24 | | 10-03 | @ Arizona U | +7 | 56.5 | 7-34 |
|
| 11-01-25 | Cincinnati U | 14 | 58 | 18 | 30/206 | 11/33/1/221 | 2/2 |
| Utah | 45 | -11.5 | 29 | 53/267 | 16/31/1/213 | 2/1 |
| Utah |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-0 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:6-0 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Idaho | -38 | W | 66-14 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | W | 17-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Arkansas | -13.5 | W | 43-10 | UN | 55.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | W | 29-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Utah State | -26.5 | W | 33-0 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | W | 16-0 | OV | 13.5 | -15.5 | W | 26-0 | UN | 30 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Iowa State | -7.5 | W | 31-17 | OV | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -4.5 | W | 24-3 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | Kansas | -15.5 | W | 41-24 | OV | 49.5 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 21-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Colorado | -15 | L | 27-24 | OV | 49.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -9.5 | W | 13-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Houston U | -6 | W | 21-13 | UN | 57.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -4 | L | 0-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Cincinnati U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-3-1 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Boston College | -7 | W | 34-15 | UN | 51.5 | -3 | PK | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 10-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Carolina | -36.5 | W | 62-10 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 28-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Miami Ohio | -14.5 | L | 35-31 | OV | 51 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10 | -7.5 | L | 7-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Kansas State | 6 | W | 31-26 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 3.5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona U | 7 | L | 7-34 | UN | 56.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ West Virginia | 1.5 | L | 42-45 | OV | 64.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | 0 | W | 21-14 | OV | 31.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Texas Tech | 11 | W | 37-24 | OV | 58 | 3.5 | W | 3-6 | UN | 13.5 | 7 | W | 24-6 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/27 11:11 pm |
| Florida | 24 | 56 | 13 | | 12 | 7 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-1 | +24.8 / -6.7 | -23 / +1.5 |
| Georgia | 31 | -11.5 | 2(0) | -11 | 3 | 18 | 4-1 / 2-0 | 3-2 / 2-0 | 5-0 / 1-1 | +31.8 / +15.5 | -29 / -11 |
While Jacksonville's EverBank Stadium undergoes stadium renovations, The Cocktail Party heads to Atlanta for a neutral site showcase between the Gators and Bulldogs. Georgia has won each of the last five meetings, but Florida has covered the spread in three of the last four and nearly pulled off an outright upset last year. Georgia running back Chauncey Bowens scored the game-winning touchdown with under five minutes remaining in the fourth quarter. Both teams are coming off bye weeks. Florida head coach Jon Sumrall has no intention of announcing his QB plans before this game kicks off. Former starter Aaron Philo has recovered from a shoulder injury that kept him limited in past weeks, but Coach Sumrall said that he may keep the ball in Tramell Jones' hands if he has a good week of practice. Jones Jr. went 22-of-35 through the air with two touchdowns and no interceptions in the Gators' upset win over Texas. Florida held the ball for over 38 minutes in that contest as star running back Jadan Baugh kept the chains moving on the ground. Georgia is our highest-rated team entering Week 9 (tied with Notre Dame, technically), but we're struggling to justify a double-digit spread in this matchup. Texas' defense is as-good (possibly a hair better?) as Georgia's defense, and the Longhorns couldn't get the Gators off the field two weeks ago. If Florida employs a similar ground-heavy strategy that churns out first downs, the Bulldogs' offense isn't going to have enough possessions to create a two-score margin. From his time at Kentucky to Troy to Tulane and now at Florida, Sumrall has a pretty good idea of how to gameplan as an underdog.
Play Florida
10/26 2:06 PM PDT — Florida head coach Jon Sumrall has no intention of announcing his QB plans before this game kicks off. Former starter Aaron Philo has recovered from a shoulder injury that kept him limited in past weeks, but Coach Sumrall said that he may keep the ball in Tramell Jones' hands if he has a good week of practice.
| Florida | 21 / 35.7 | -14.7 | 10 | 14 | -1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Georgia | 27.3 / 19.3 | +8 | 2 | 14 | -14 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Florida | 10-17 | @ Texas | +13 | 51.5 | 27-24 | Georgia | 10-17 | Auburn | -19 | 50 | 24-27 |
| | 10-10 | South Car. | -10 | 59.5 | 19-38 | | 10-10 | @ Alabama | +2.5 | 52 | 20-17 |
| | 10-03 | @ Missouri | -5.5 | 58 | 17-45 | | 10-03 | Vanderbilt | -25.5 | 50 | 38-14 |
|
| 11-01-25 | Georgia | 24 | -7 | 21 | 37/140 | 20/29/1/223 | 1/0 |
| Florida | 20 | 50.5 | 16 | 31/116 | 15/24/0/166 | 1/0 |
| 11-02-24 | Florida | 20 | 52.5 | 13 | 38/115 | 9/30/1/113 | 1/0 |
| Georgia | 34 | -15 | 26 | 33/146 | 25/40/3/309 | 0/0 |
| Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-2-1 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Florida Atlantic | -25.5 | W | 66-21 | OV | 59.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Campbell | -51.5 | L | 52-3 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 45-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Auburn | -2.5 | W | 44-39 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Mississippi | -4 | W | 52-28 | OV | 59 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Missouri | -5.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 58 | -0.5 | L | 3-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | L | 10-20 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | South Carolina | -10 | L | 19-38 | UN | 59.5 | -2.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | L | 10-17 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas | 13 | W | 27-24 | UN | 51.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | PK | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1Q SUR:6-0 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tennessee St | -49.5 | W | 63-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Western Kentucky | -40.5 | W | 70-20 | OV | 55.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -24.5 | W | 49-6 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arkansas | -24.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | W | 21-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma | -11 | W | 41-13 | OV | 44 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7 | W | 28-0 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Vanderbilt | -25.5 | L | 38-14 | OV | 50 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -15.5 | L | 21-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Alabama | 2.5 | W | 20-17 | UN | 52 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-14 | UN | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | Auburn | -19 | L | 24-27 | OV | 50 | -4.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Temple | 24 | 51.5 | 39.5 | | 37 | 52 | 1-4 / 1-1 | 2-3 / 2-0 | 2-3 / 1-1 | -3.8 / +1.5 | -1.5 / +5 |
| East Carolina | 23 | -4 | 35.5(2) | -6 | 34 | 28 | 2-1 / 1-3 | 1-2 / 2-2 | 0-3 / 2-2 | +15.3 / -13.8 | -18 / +9 |
East Carolina is 5-0 straight-up, 4-1 against the spread over the last five meetings. The Pirates earned a 45-14 road win in Philadelphia last season, out-gaining the Owls by nearly 400 yards in that contest. Temple is coming off a much-needed bye week after losing to Charlotte the prior week. The Owls dropped back-to-back games as a home favorite against UConn and Charlotte - the last one as a 17.5-point home favorite. Perhaps a road trip is necessary for the cherry-and-white, who are 2-0 against the spread away from home this season with an outright upset win at South Florida. East Carolina also had some extra time to prep for this game after falling at Memphis last Thursday. The Pirates return home after dropping back-to-back road games at UAB and Memphis. That 41-34 loss to the Tigers broke a string of five-straight "under" results in ECU's games. Our power ratings are in line with where this game has opened, but we can only look in Temple's direction. That was a disastrous loss to the 49ers, but when you're dealing with a group of young men that are a three-touchdown favorite with a bye week on the horizon, sometimes they lose focus. It happens. Head coach K.C. Keeler acknowledged that he may have been applying too much pressure toward his roster and assistant coaches, and took a step back during the bye week so that everyone could do some self-scouting. Championship-winning coaches like Keeler generally get the benefit of doubt when it comes to bouncing back from a tough loss like that.
Play Temple
| Temple | 22.7 / 28.3 | -5.7 | 36 | 41 | -5 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| East Carolina | 26.3 / 27.7 | -1.3 | 35 | 37 | -1.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Temple | 10-17 | Charlotte | -17 | 47 | 31-38 | East Carolina | 10-22 | @ Memphis | +10 | 55 | 34-41 |
| | 10-10 | Connectic. | -3.5 | 55.5 | 20-34 | | 10-15 | @ UAB | -4.5 | 49 | 17-30 |
| | 10-03 | @ South Flo. | +5 | 50.5 | 17-13 | | 10-10 | Rice | -10 | 46.5 | 28-12 |
|
| 11-01-25 | East Carolina | 45 | -5.5 | 26 | 51/358 | 19/24/1/256 | 1/1 |
| Temple | 14 | 58 | 11 | 30/82 | 15/25/1/151 | 0/0 |
| Temple |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Rhode Island | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 10-7 | OV | | | W | 24-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Penn State | 24 | W | 9-27 | UN | 49.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | W | 3-10 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Toledo | 4.5 | W | 48-49 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3 | W | 24-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-25-26 | Army | 3.5 | L | 17-21 | UN | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Florida | 5 | W | 17-13 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Connecticut | -3.5 | L | 20-34 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 10.5 | -3 | L | 17-24 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Charlotte | -17 | L | 31-38 | OV | 47 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -10 | L | 14-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| East Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:0-6-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Alabama | 28 | L | 10-48 | OV | 52.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 16.5 | L | 7-38 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Appalachian St | -6.5 | L | 24-27 | UN | 55.5 | -3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13 | -4 | L | 10-17 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Old Dominion | 2.5 | W | 20-17 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | NC Central | -37.5 | L | 42-9 | UN | 58 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 42-3 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | Rice | -10 | W | 28-12 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-15-26 | @ UAB | -4.5 | L | 17-30 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 14-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-22-26 | @ Memphis | 10 | W | 34-41 | OV | 55 | 2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 12.5 | 6.5 | W | 16-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Stanford | 13 | 59 | 31.5 | | 31 | 23 | 4-1 / 0-3 | 3-2 / 0-3 | 4-1 / 2-1 | +1.6 / -44.3 | -0.5 / +21.5 |
| Louisville | 42 | -22.5 | 15.5(2) | -18 | 15 | 31 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 3-1 / 0-2 | 3-1 / 2-0 | +19.3 / +2.5 | -14.5 / -10 |
Can lightning strike twice? Stanford won the lone meeting between these teams since joining the ACC, earning a 38-35 win in 2024 as a three-touchdown underdog. Louisville is coming off its bye week after previously taking down Florida State and Syracuse. Six of Louisville's seven games have gone over the total, and the lone game that stayed under only did so by a half-point (30-27 vs Wake Forest with a total of 57.5). It certainly hasn't been pretty at times, but Stanford has already eclipsed its season win total projection of 3.5. Two conference home wins over Georgia Tech and NC State have made this a successful opening campaign for first-year head coach Tavita Pritchard. Now time for the negatives. Stanford's bye is next week and this will be the Cardinal's seventh-straight week with a game. Stanford's first three trips east have been disastrous, going 0-3 straight-up and against the spread while scoring a total of 17 points in those three contests. We respect what Pritchard has accomplished thus far, but this looks like a rough spot for his squad. Until the Cardinal's offense shows that it can travel east, we're comfortable laying this number with Louisville.
Play Louisville
| Stanford | 24 / 31 | -7 | 32 | 27 | +4.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Louisville | 35.3 / 25.7 | +9.7 | 16 | 24 | -8 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Stanford | 10-23 | NC State | +7.5 | 55 | 31-28 | Louisville | 10-17 | @ Syracuse | -14.5 | 57 | 34-26 |
| | 10-17 | Elon | -34 | 56 | 34-7 | | 10-09 | Florida S. | -4 | 61 | 44-20 |
| | 10-10 | @ Notre Dame | +40.5 | 55 | 7-58 | | 10-03 | @ NC State | -5 | 56.5 | 28-31 |
|
| 11-16-24 | Louisville | 35 | -21 | 21 | 26/162 | 26/40/1/270 | 1/0 |
| Stanford | 38 | 57.5 | 22 | 37/83 | 23/34/1/323 | 1/0 |
| Stanford |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Hawaii | -4.5 | W | 37-27 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10 | -3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24 |
| 09-04-26 | Miami Florida | 24.5 | L | 6-45 | OV | 46.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | 14 | L | 6-28 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Duke | 10 | L | 7-35 | UN | 51.5 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Georgia Tech | 3 | W | 34-27 | OV | 48 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-20 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | 14.5 | L | 3-57 | OV | 54 | 3.5 | L | 0-15 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 3-29 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Notre Dame | 40.5 | L | 7-58 | OV | 55 | 7.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 23.5 | L | 0-37 | OV | 31 |
| 10-17-26 | Elon | -34 | L | 34-7 | UN | 56 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 10-23-26 | NC State | 7.5 | W | 31-28 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 12.5 | 4.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisville |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:1-5-1 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Mississippi | 6.5 | W | 38-41 | OV | 54.5 | 3 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | 4 | PK | 6-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Villanova | -39 | W | 59-13 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 17-3 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-10 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | SMU | -3 | W | 41-31 | OV | 57.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Wake Forest | -11 | L | 27-30 | UN | 57.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 21-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ NC State | -5 | L | 28-31 | OV | 56.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | L | 7-13 | UN | 28 |
| 10-09-26 | Florida State | -4 | W | 44-20 | OV | 61 | -0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | -2.5 | L | 14-14 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Syracuse | -14.5 | L | 34-26 | OV | 57 | -3.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | L | 28-23 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia Tech | 27 | 54.5 | 29 | | 25 | 31 | 2-3 / 0-2 | 1-4 / 0-2 | 3-2 / 2-0 | -1.6 / -8.5 | -7 / +3 |
| Pittsburgh U | 28 | -9.5 | 26(2) | -5 | 21 | 5 | 4-1 / 1-2 | 3-2 / 1-2 | 1-4 / 3-0 | +23.8 / -11 | -18.5 / +5 |
Pitt is 5-1 straight-up and against the spread over the last six meetings, including a 42-28 road win in Atlanta last season. The gift of Pat Narduzzi continues to bless the college football world. After complaining that his Panthers weren't ranked after beating Virginia Tech, Pitt has gone 0-3 straight-up and against the spread. The Panthers were embarrassed in Miami last week as the Hurricanes scored 52 points with over 500 yards on offense. Things haven't gone much better for the Ramblin' Wreck as Georgia Tech is just 1-6 against the spread this season. The Yellow Jackets are coming off back-to-back double-digit losses to Virginia Tech and Boston College. They still have a bit to go before they start making any headlines, but Georgia Tech's offense has shown some signs of life in recent weeks. The Jackets have scored 24+ points in all four conference games thus far. Anything in that neighborhood on Saturday should be enough to keep Georgia Tech within the number against a Pitt team that's playing QB roulette. Also, Georgia Tech scoring 24 points against Tennessee in Week 2 is aging quite well considering what the Vols' defense has done to SEC opposition thus far.
Play Georgia Tech
| Georgia Tech | 26.3 / 36 | -9.7 | 26 | 23 | +2.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Pittsburgh U | 20.3 / 33.3 | -13 | 23 | 20 | +3.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Georgia Tech | 10-24 | Boston Co. | -6.5 | 50 | 27-49 | Pittsburgh U | 10-24 | @ Miami Flo. | +20.5 | 50.5 | 23-52 |
| | 10-17 | @ Virginia . | +9 | 55 | 24-34 | | 10-17 | @ Boston Co. | -6.5 | 42.5 | 21-27 |
| | 10-10 | Duke | +4.5 | 45.5 | 28-25 | | 10-10 | North Car. | -3.5 | 47.5 | 17-21 |
|
| 11-22-25 | Pittsburgh U | 42 | 60.5 | 22 | 40/186 | 20/27/0/226 | 1/0 |
| Georgia Tech | 28 | -2.5 | 21 | 33/121 | 27/41/2/257 | 0/0 |
| Georgia Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Colorado | -6.5 | L | 13-14 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Tennessee U | 12.5 | L | 24-45 | OV | 55.5 | 3.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 13 | 6.5 | L | 10-24 | OV | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Mercer | -38.5 | L | 44-11 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 24-3 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Stanford | -3 | L | 27-34 | OV | 48 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 20-10 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | Duke | 4.5 | W | 28-25 | OV | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 14-10 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 9 | L | 24-34 | OV | 55 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 6 | L | 3-24 | UN | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | Boston College | -6.5 | L | 27-49 | OV | 50 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 13-12 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Pittsburgh U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-2-1 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Miami Ohio | -16.5 | W | 59-14 | OV | 48 | -3.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 10 | -9.5 | W | 31-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Central Florida | -7 | L | 12-7 | UN | 55 | -3 | PK | 3-0 | UN | 13 | -4.5 | W | 12-0 | UN | 28 |
| 09-17-26 | Syracuse | -10.5 | W | 27-13 | UN | 51 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Bucknell | -54.5 | W | 59-0 | UN | 63.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 10-02-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 1 | W | 35-33 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 21-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | North Carolina | -3.5 | L | 17-21 | UN | 47.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Boston College | -6.5 | L | 21-27 | OV | 42.5 | -0.5 | W | 12-7 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 12-14 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Miami Florida | 20.5 | L | 23-52 | OV | 50.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 11 | L | 7-31 | OV | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Illinois | 34 | -3 | 18.5 | -9 | 20 | 9 | 3-2 / 1-1 | 2-3 / 1-1 | 3-2 / 2-0 | +11.4 / -11 | -13 / +12 |
| Maryland | 31 | 54.5 | 29.5(2) | | 25 | 30 | 1-3 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 2-1 | 4-0 / 2-1 | -1.3 / -10 | -11.5 / +11.5 |
Illinois has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings, including a 24-6 home win last year. Each of the last three meetings have stayed under the total. Whelp, they finally did it. Maryland kicked off the coaching carousel by firing Mike Locksley during the Terps' bye week. Aazaar Abdul-Rahim will be serving as the interim head coach over the remainder of the season. Maryland was 0-5 straight-up, 1-4 against the spread over the last five games with all five of those contests going over the total. Illinois is coming off back-to-back wins over Michigan State and Oregon with back-up QB Michael Clayton II at the helm. Clayton II has largely played mistake-free football in relief of starter Katin Houser, who will miss the next few weeks with a hand injury. The Illini upset the Ducks last week as a double-digit home 'dog. While we do show some value on Illinois as a short road favorite, we see no reason to jump off the Maryland "over" train. The Illini had a conservative gameplan for Clayton II against the Ducks, but Maryland's defense represents a steep drop in class from what he saw last week against Oregon. Houser might not come back this season, so it's time to cut Clayton II loose to see what he's got. During this current five-game losing streak, Maryland has allowed an average of 43.8 points per game.
Play the Over
| Illinois | 25.3 / 23.7 | +1.7 | 21 | 21 | -0.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Maryland | 23 / 43.3 | -20.3 | 27 | 16 | +13.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Illinois | 10-24 | Oregon | +10.5 | 49 | 21-10 | Maryland | 10-17 | Rutgers | -5.5 | 56 | 30-37 |
| | 10-10 | @ Michigan . | -2.5 | 48.5 | 38-37 | | 10-10 | @ Ohio State | +31 | 56.5 | 16-45 |
| | 10-03 | Purdue | -9 | 62 | 17-24 | | 10-03 | @ Nebraska | +14.5 | 52.5 | 23-48 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Maryland | 6 | 51.5 | 18 | 18/55 | 25/46/1/238 | 0/0 |
| Illinois | 24 | -17 | 24 | 48/225 | 15/25/1/172 | 0/0 |
| Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-03-26 | UAB | -25.5 | L | 42-23 | OV | 54 | -7 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | L | 21-13 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Duke | -6 | L | 27-31 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Southern Illinois | -35 | W | 48-10 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Ohio State | 26 | W | 19-42 | OV | 53.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | L | 10-28 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Purdue | -9 | L | 17-24 | UN | 62 | -2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6 | L | 7-13 | UN | 31 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Michigan State | -2.5 | L | 38-37 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | Oregon | 10.5 | W | 21-10 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Maryland |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Hampton | -45.5 | W | 62-0 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 17-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Connecticut | -11 | W | 38-14 | UN | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -7 | W | 17-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Virginia Tech | 2.5 | L | 26-35 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 0.5 | L | 14-27 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | UCLA | 2.5 | L | 3-54 | OV | 55.5 | 0 | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Nebraska | 14.5 | L | 23-48 | OV | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 16-7 | OV | 12.5 | 8.5 | W | 23-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio State | 31 | W | 16-45 | OV | 56.5 | 7.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 18.5 | L | 10-31 | OV | 31 |
| 10-17-26 | Rutgers | -5.5 | L | 30-37 | OV | 56 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -3 | W | 23-13 | OV | 28 |
| 10-31-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan | 26 | -16.5 | 15.5 | -11.5 | 13 | 7 | 4-2 / 0-1 | 2-3-1 / 0-1 | 1-5 / 0-1 | +6.3 / -6 | -10 / -6.5 |
| Rutgers | 13 | 47 | 29(2) | | 29 | 18 | 1-3 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 4-0 / 1-2 | -1 / -9.3 | -6.5 / +8 |
Michigan has won each of the last nine meetings, but these Big Ten foes haven't met since the Wolverines' 31-7 home win in September 2023. Both teams are coming off disappointing losses last week. Michigan pushed Indiana to overtime, but couldn't get over the hump. Tommy Carr went 20-of-32 for 167 yards with no touchdowns and one interception against the defending champs. The Wolverines' defense did not allow a single pass completion in the second half, but couldn't get any help on the offensive end. Six of the Wolverines' seven games have stayed under the total. Rutgers returns home after getting blown out at Northwestern last week. Starting QB Dylan Lonergan was knocked out of that game on the third play with an apparent head injury. AJ Surace came in and went 7-for-18 for 64 yards with an interception. Sean Ashenfelder replaced him, then went 2-for-9 for 36 yards with an interception. Needless to say, the Scarlet Knights are very hopeful that Lonergan can return, although there's been no update on his status as we go to print on Tuesday. If the Wolverines' defense can pick itself off the mat for one more fight, we're struggling to see how the Scarlet Knights are going to pull their share of the weight on this total.
Play the Under
| Michigan | 13.7 / 17 | -3.3 | 14 | 15 | -2 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Rutgers | 22 / 39.7 | -17.7 | 29 | 17 | +15 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Michigan | 10-24 | Indiana | +7 | 43.5 | 6-13 | Rutgers | 10-24 | @ Northwest. | +15 | 58.5 | 14-42 |
| | 10-17 | Penn State | -6 | 43 | 21-18 | | 10-17 | @ Maryland | +5.5 | 56 | 37-30 |
| | 10-03 | @ Minnesota. | -6.5 | 42 | 14-20 | | 10-03 | Indiana | +24.5 | 56 | 15-47 |
| Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-4-1 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-5-1 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Michigan | -27.5 | L | 13-12 | UN | 50.5 | -7 | L | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -16.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Oklahoma | 5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 10-0 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UTEP | -34.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 48.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -20 | L | 17-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Iowa | -4.5 | L | 19-20 | UN | 40 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 7.5 | -2 | W | 10-7 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Minnesota U | -6.5 | L | 14-20 | UN | 42 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 14-7 | P | 21 |
| 10-17-26 | Penn State | -6 | L | 21-18 | UN | 43 | -1.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | Indiana | 7 | PK | 6-13 | UN | 43.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | 4 | L | 0-6 | UN | 21 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rutgers |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-6 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Massachusetts | -29.5 | L | 21-37 | OV | 55 | -7.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -17.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-11-26 | @ Boston College | 3 | L | 21-28 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | USC | 21 | W | 35-42 | OV | 58.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | 13.5 | W | 14-20 | OV | 31 |
| 09-25-26 | Howard | -42 | W | 58-7 | OV | 57 | | W | 21-7 | OV | | | W | 41-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Indiana | 24.5 | L | 15-47 | OV | 56 | 6.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | L | 0-23 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Maryland | 5.5 | W | 37-30 | OV | 56 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 3 | L | 13-23 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Northwestern | 15 | L | 14-42 | UN | 58.5 | 4.5 | L | 3-21 | OV | 13.5 | 9.5 | L | 6-28 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Appalachian St | 27 | 55 | 38.5 | | 39 | 26 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 3-0 | 2-2 / 2-1 | +13.3 / -1.3 | -9 / +6.5 |
| Georgia Southern | 24 | -6 | 37.5(1) | -2 | 38 | 40 | 1-2 / 2-2 | 3-0 / 3-1 | 1-2 / 2-2 | +4.7 / -1 | -1.5 / +4.5 |
Hey, you look familiar. Georgia Southern and App State played twice in a two-month span last season with the Eagles sweeping both contests. Georgia Southern has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings, with all three of those contests staying under the total. The Eagles are coming off their bye week after previously winning at Old Dominion. Georgia Southern is one point away from being 7-0 against the spread this season (lost by four at Jacksonville State as a 3.5-point 'dog). We continue to be higher on App State compared to the rest of the betting market. The Mountaineers have won-and-covered each of their last two games against Coastal Carolina and James Madison. App State continues to experiment with two-quarterback rotations, using Malachi Singleton in most passing situations with Henry Hasselbeck providing the running threat. Singleton went 26-of-40 through the air with two touchdowns in last week's upset win over the Dukes. Don't forget, App State's home loss to Old Dominion was played in tropical depression conditions where neither team threw the ball for 100 yards. What would this spread be if App State had won that game under normal conditions and the Mountaineers were 6-1 entering this game? Clay Helton has a good squad in Statesboro, but his teams have been known to slip on a banana peel or two over the years.
Play App State
| Appalachian St | 24 / 24.3 | -0.3 | 39 | 36 | +1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Georgia Southern | 26 / 22 | +4 | 39 | 36 | +0.5 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Appalachian St | 10-22 | James Mad. | +11.5 | 57 | 34-31 | Georgia Southern | 10-15 | @ Old Domin. | -3 | 45 | 23-15 |
| | 10-16 | @ Coastal C. | PK | 48.5 | 35-32 | | 10-10 | James Mad. | +7 | 51.5 | 24-27 |
| | 10-10 | Old Domin. | -9 | 46 | 3-10 | | 10-03 | @ Coastal C. | -2.5 | 53 | 31-24 |
|
| 12-29-25 | Georgia Southern | 29 | -10 | 22 | 38/242 | 18/27/1/171 | 0/0 |
| Appalachian St | 10 | 58.5 | 21 | 33/187 | 16/29/4/192 | 0/0 |
| 11-06-25 | Georgia Southern | 25 | 61.5 | 25 | 37/143 | 25/37/0/352 | 0/0 |
| Appalachian St | 23 | -5 | 23 | 23/77 | 34/51/1/348 | 2/0 |
| 11-30-24 | Appalachian St | 20 | 60 | 25 | 38/198 | 19/35/2/290 | 1/0 |
| Georgia Southern | 29 | -2.5 | 23 | 41/191 | 16/19/0/166 | 2/2 |
| Appalachian St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Maine | -21 | W | 55-3 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ East Carolina | 6.5 | W | 27-24 | UN | 55.5 | 3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13 | 4 | W | 17-10 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Charlotte | -16.5 | L | 26-21 | UN | 52.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -9.5 | L | 13-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ NC State | 13 | W | 31-41 | OV | 56 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | L | 10-28 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Old Dominion | -9 | L | 3-10 | UN | 46 | -2.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6 | L | 0-0 | UN | 23 |
| 10-16-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | 0 | W | 35-32 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 14-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-22-26 | James Madison | 11.5 | W | 34-31 | OV | 57 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | W | 10-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia Southern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-2-1 |
| 09-05-26 | Charleston Southern | -28.5 | W | 31-0 | UN | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 24-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Clemson | 19.5 | W | 7-22 | UN | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11 | W | 7-16 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 3.5 | L | 27-31 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 24-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Houston U | 17 | W | 28-42 | OV | 56.5 | 4.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 10 | L | 14-28 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | -2.5 | W | 31-24 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -1 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | James Madison | 7 | W | 24-27 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 10-6 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-15-26 | @ Old Dominion | -3 | W | 23-15 | UN | 45 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 16-7 | P | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miami Florida | 38 | -13 | 5 | -14.5 | 5 | 25 | 4-0 / 3-0 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 4-0 / 2-1 | +39 / +26.7 | -35.5 / -19.5 |
| North Carolina | 13 | 53 | 21.5(2) | | 23 | 31 | 1-2 / 2-1 | 1-2 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 1-2 | +6.7 / 0 | -8 / +3 |
Surprisingly (maybe?), North Carolina has won each of the last five meetings, with the last one being a 41-31 home win in October 2023. Five of the last six meetings between the Tar Heels and Hurricanes have gone over the total. North Carolina suffered another heartbreaking loss last week against Syracuse, falling by one point in overtime on a two-point conversion. The Orange did a nice job keeping Bill Belichick and Co. on their toes last week, with everyone in their QB room battling injuries and ailments. Original-starter Steve Angeli returned after missing the prior three games, and he looked much more prepared for that contest than he was at the beginning of the season. Miami is 7-0 straight-up, 5-2 against the spread this season following last week's blow-out win over Pitt. Following Miami's bye week in early October, the 'Canes got several key pieces back from injury. Integrating them into the lineup didn't look pretty at times against Florida State two weeks ago, but we saw what full-strength Miami looked like in last week's 29-point win over Pitt. Six of Miami's seven games have gone over the total. This looks like the first game where North Carolina is truly going to be at an athletic disadvantage. Belichick and the Tar Heels have been able to make some things happen with smoke and mirrors, but this feels like the first time where UNC may get blown off the field by a superior opponent. UNC caught Clemson when true freshman Tait Reynolds was making his first career start. They played Notre Dame in a monsoon. They played Pitt in the Panthers' first game without starting QB Mason Heintschel. North Carolina has been placed in some fortunate situations this season, and that likely won't be the case on Saturday.
Play Miami (Fla)
| Miami Florida | 45.3 / 23.7 | +21.7 | 5 | 22 | -18.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| North Carolina | 25 / 22.7 | +2.3 | 23 | 24 | -0.5 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Miami Florida | 10-24 | Pittsburg. | -20.5 | 50.5 | 52-23 | North Carolina | 10-24 | Syracuse | -8 | 49.5 | 30-31 |
| | 10-17 | Florida S. | -20.5 | 57 | 43-35 | | 10-17 | @ Duke | +3 | 47 | 24-20 |
| | 10-03 | @ Clemson | -14 | 49 | 41-13 | | 10-10 | @ Pittsburg. | +3.5 | 47.5 | 21-17 |
| Miami Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-0 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1Q SUR:6-0 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:6-0 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Stanford | -24.5 | W | 45-6 | OV | 46.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | -14 | W | 28-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-10-26 | Florida A&M | -59.5 | W | 77-7 | OV | 66.5 | -16.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 17.5 | -36.5 | W | 49-0 | OV | 38.5 |
| 09-18-26 | @ Wake Forest | -20 | L | 33-20 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -11 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Central Michigan | -41 | W | 52-3 | OV | 52 | -10.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -24 | W | 35-3 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Clemson | -14 | W | 41-13 | OV | 49 | -3.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Florida State | -20.5 | L | 43-35 | OV | 57 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11.5 | L | 14-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Pittsburgh U | -20.5 | W | 52-23 | OV | 50.5 | -5.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -11 | W | 31-7 | OV | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ TCU | 7.5 | W | 15-10 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | W | 12-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | East Tennessee State | -36.5 | L | 35-3 | UN | 55 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Clemson | 3 | L | 20-28 | OV | 44.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 7.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-6 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Notre Dame | 21 | W | 26-37 | OV | 46.5 | 5.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 11 | W | 14-21 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 3.5 | W | 21-17 | UN | 47.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Duke | 3 | W | 24-20 | UN | 47 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Syracuse | -8 | L | 30-31 | OV | 49.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | -5.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UAB | 23 | 43.5 | 38 | | 40 | 35 | 4-0 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 1-1-1 | 0-4 / 1-2 | +10.5 / -17 | -7.5 / +16 |
| South Florida | 28 | -7.5 | 34(2) | -6 | 31 | 50 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 2-1 | +18.8 / +1.7 | -19.5 / -3 |
South Florida has won each of the last two meetings, including a 48-18 road win in Birmingham last season. The Bulls generated 544 total yards in that contest, which was only 17-10 at halftime before the flood gates opened in the second half. UAB actually had 27 first downs in that contest and nearly 400 total yards, but couldn't overcome three interceptions from former QB Jalen Kitna. Both teams are coming off their bye weeks. The Blazers have already eclipsed their season win total projection of 3.5 after beating East Carolina. The Blazers' last six games have all stayed under the total. South Florida has dropped its last two conference games against UTSA and Temple. There's still plenty of time to go, but this hasn't been a strong debut season for Brian Hartline in Tampa. An offensive minded coach in a recruiting hot bed like South Florida has produced 19 points against Florida International, 14 points against Bowling Green and 13 points against Temple. Both teams have been involved in low-scoring affairs so we understand why this total is in the low-40s, but this feels like too big of an adjustment. We're looking at a total that's roughly two touchdowns lower than what UAB saw against the likes of Illinois, Louisiana and Memphis. Both young coaching staffs are in their infancy, but both have earned some leeway that they will have something new in the playbook coming out of the bye.
Play the Over
| UAB | 25.3 / 23 | +2.3 | 40 | 39 | -4 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| South Florida | 22 / 16.7 | +5.3 | 33 | 38 | -6.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| UAB | 10-15 | East Caro. | +4.5 | 49 | 30-17 | South Florida | 10-17 | Kent State | -20.5 | 45.5 | 29-2 |
| | 10-10 | @ Memphis | +15 | 55 | 13-38 | | 10-08 | @ Tex San A. | +5.5 | 49.5 | 24-31 |
| | 10-03 | Samford | -31 | 54.5 | 33-14 | | 10-03 | Temple | -5 | 50.5 | 13-17 |
|
| 11-22-25 | South Florida | 48 | -21.5 | 24 | 34/191 | 19/25/0/353 | 2/1 |
| UAB | 18 | 68.5 | 27 | 43/131 | 21/40/3/251 | 0/0 |
| UAB |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-2-1 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Illinois | 25.5 | W | 23-42 | OV | 54 | 7 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | W | 13-21 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | UL Monroe | -9 | L | 26-20 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13 | -6 | L | 10-17 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Louisiana | 7 | PK | 14-21 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-25-26 | Navy | 6.5 | W | 24-20 | UN | 50 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 17-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Samford | -31 | L | 33-14 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 10-7 | OV | | | L | 13-14 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | @ Memphis | 15 | L | 13-38 | UN | 55 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 8.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-15-26 | East Carolina | 4.5 | W | 30-17 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 3-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:1-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Florida Intl | -14.5 | L | 19-9 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 6-0 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Army | 3 | W | 28-24 | OV | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 23 |
| 09-19-26 | Delaware State | -37.5 | W | 59-17 | OV | 60 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 28-17 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Bowling Green | -17.5 | L | 14-6 | UN | 49 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -9.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Temple | -5 | L | 13-17 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | 5.5 | L | 24-31 | OV | 49.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10 | 3 | W | 17-10 | OV | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Kent State | -20.5 | W | 29-2 | UN | 45.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-2 | UN | 9.5 | -11.5 | L | 10-2 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| SMU | 31 | -8 | 17 | -5.5 | 15 | 26 | 5-0 / 1-1 | 2-2-1 / 0-1-1 | 2-3 / 1-1 | +22.8 / -3.5 | -22.5 / 0 |
| Syracuse | 27 | 58.5 | 24.5(2) | | 28 | 22 | 1-2 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 3-1 | +17.3 / -3.8 | -8.5 / +6.5 |
SMU earned a 31-18 win over Syracuse last October in their lone meeting since joining the ACC. The Orange out-gained the Mustangs in that contest but couldn't overcome three interceptions thrown by former QB (now Kennesaw QB) Rickie Collins. SMU is 6-1 this season with the lone loss coming at Louisville. The Mustangs trailed Cal 20-17 at halftime last week before out-scoring the Bears 42-0 in the second half. Those Jekyll and Hyde efforts have been the norm for SMU this season as the Mustangs have struggled to put 60 strong minutes together in a collective effort. SMU's next three games include a short-week home game against Virginia Tech, a home game against 6-1 Wake Forest and a road game at Notre Dame. Needless to say, head coach Rhett Lashlee might have his hands full with keeping his team focused as a double-digit road favorite this week. Syracuse is hopeful that the wave of QB injuries, penalties, turnovers and mistakes has calmed down. Original-starter Steve Angeli returned last week against North Carolina after missing the prior three games, and he looked much more prepared for that contest than he was at the beginning of the season. Those penalty and turnover issues have made Syracuse a tough team to trust, but perhaps last week's upset win over the Tar Heels was a turn-the-corner moment for the Orange.
Play Syracuse
| SMU | 35.7 / 16.3 | +19.3 | 16 | 27 | -16.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 1-1-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Syracuse | 27.3 / 30.7 | -3.3 | 31 | 19 | +12 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| SMU | 10-24 | California | -18.5 | 55.5 | 59-20 | Syracuse | 10-24 | @ North Car. | +8 | 49.5 | 31-30 |
| | 10-17 | Virginia | -10 | 51 | 23-13 | | 10-17 | Louisville | +14.5 | 57 | 26-34 |
| | 10-03 | Boston Co. | -21.5 | 55.5 | 25-16 | | 10-10 | @ Virginia | +14 | 49 | 25-28 |
|
| 10-04-25 | Syracuse | 18 | 57 | 18 | 33/110 | 22/45/3/279 | 1/0 |
| SMU | 31 | -18 | 21 | 28/76 | 30/36/1/294 | 1/0 |
| SMU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:2-3-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:0-6 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:6-1 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-3-1 |
| 09-07-26 | @ Florida State | -3 | PK | 27-24 | UN | 52.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -1.5 | W | 17-10 | P | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | UC Davis | -32.5 | W | 56-10 | OV | 59 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Louisville | 3 | L | 31-41 | OV | 57.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri State | -30.5 | L | 34-24 | UN | 59.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 14.5 | -19.5 | L | 14-10 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Boston College | -21.5 | L | 25-16 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 6-10 | OV | 13.5 | -13 | L | 13-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Virginia | -10 | PK | 23-13 | UN | 51 | -3.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-24-26 | California | -18.5 | W | 59-20 | OV | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 17-20 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Syracuse |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | New Hampshire | -35.5 | W | 66-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | California | -4 | L | 18-21 | UN | 57 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 12-7 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-17-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 10.5 | L | 13-27 | UN | 51 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Connecticut | -6.5 | L | 42-41 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-7 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 27-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Virginia | 14 | W | 25-28 | OV | 49 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | W | 17-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Louisville | 14.5 | W | 26-34 | OV | 57 | 3.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | W | 23-28 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ North Carolina | 8 | W | 31-30 | OV | 49.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | 5.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bowling Green | 27 | 45 | 47 | | 46 | 48 | 1-3 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 4-0 | +3 / -25 | +0.5 / +16.5 |
| Western Michigan | 24 | -14 | 35(1) | -13 | 36 | 37 | 2-1 / 3-2 | 2-1 / 1-4 | 2-1 / 2-3 | +13.7 / +1.8 | -12 / +0.5 |
Bowling Green has won each of the last three meetings, with the last one being a 31-13 home win in November 2024. Six of the last seven meetings between the Broncos and Falcons have stayed under the total. Outside of Kent State vs Sacramento State on Friday, this is the only MAC game on this week's slate as the teams get prepared for midweek MACtion on the horizon. It should be a pretty good one, especially if you like hard-nosed football in the trenches. Western Michigan returns home after splitting back-to-back road games at Central Michigan (win) and Toledo (loss). The Broncos are just 1-5 against the spread over the last six games, and we have some interest in backing Bowling Green in this matchup. This is a nice buy-low spot on the Falcons after they dropped a pair of hard-fought contests against Ball State and Buffalo, both of which went down to the wire. Normally-steady QB Jay Kastantin had his first two-interception day of the season against the Bulls last week, and Bowling Green struggled to overcome those. From a size and physicality standpoint, Western Michigan probably profiles fairly similar to South Florida, who Bowling Green nearly beat last month. The Falcons held the Bulls to 214 total yards and 16 first downs on 4.0 yards per play. If you can hold up in the trenches against South Florida, the Falcons should be able to hold up in the trenches against Western Michigan.
Play Bowling Green
| Bowling Green | 31 / 24.3 | +6.7 | 45 | 51 | -4 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Western Michigan | 32.3 / 22 | +10.3 | 35 | 44 | -6.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Bowling Green | 10-24 | @ Buffalo U | +3 | 44.5 | 24-31 | Western Michigan | 10-24 | @ Toledo | +2.5 | 48.5 | 38-45 |
| | 10-17 | Ball State | -6 | 46.5 | 31-32 | | 10-17 | @ Central M. | -7.5 | 42.5 | 21-14 |
| | 10-10 | Sacrament. | -9 | 43.5 | 38-10 | | 10-10 | Kent State | -14 | 43.5 | 38-7 |
|
| 11-12-24 | Western Michigan | 13 | 57.5 | 19 | 35/132 | 24/33/2/195 | 2/0 |
| Bowling Green | 31 | -9.5 | 19 | 31/230 | 15/22/0/176 | 2/1 |
| Bowling Green |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-6 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tarleton State | -1.5 | L | 13-20 | UN | 49.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | L | 7-17 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Nebraska | 31 | L | 7-56 | OV | 49 | 7 | L | 0-14 | OV | 11.5 | 17.5 | L | 0-35 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Iowa State | 22.5 | L | 7-55 | OV | 43.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | L | 7-35 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Florida | 17.5 | W | 6-14 | UN | 49 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 9.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Miami Ohio | 10 | W | 24-20 | OV | 41.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-6 | UN | 21 |
| 10-10-26 | Sacramento State | -9 | W | 38-10 | OV | 43.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -6 | W | 17-3 | UN | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Ball State | -6 | L | 31-32 | OV | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Buffalo U | 3 | L | 24-31 | OV | 44.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 7.5 | 1.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Western Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Michigan | 27.5 | W | 12-13 | UN | 50.5 | 7 | W | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Monmouth | -29.5 | W | 49-14 | OV | 54.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rice | -7.5 | L | 28-21 | OV | 43.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Boise State | 8 | L | 7-32 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-8 | UN | 9.5 | 4.5 | L | 0-15 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Buffalo U | -13 | L | 20-17 | UN | 46 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Kent State | -14 | W | 38-7 | OV | 43.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7 | W | 21-7 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Central Michigan | -7.5 | L | 21-14 | UN | 42.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -4 | W | 14-0 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Toledo | 2.5 | L | 38-45 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 14-31 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Boston College | 19 | 49 | 30.5 | | 32 | 25 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 1-3 / 1-2 | +3 / -2 | -5 / +11.5 |
| Duke | 24 | -7 | 19(1) | -12.5 | 20 | 23 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 1-3 / 2-1 | +23.3 / +1.3 | -16.5 / +1.5 |
This is the first meeting between Duke and Boston College since the Blue Devils earned a 38-31 road win in 2022. Duke snapped a two-game losing skid with a small road upset win at Virginia last week. Already regarded as one of the country's best running backs, Nate Sheppard got to show off the arm last week with a 28-yard touchdown pass with under two minutes remaining to beat the Cavaliers. Boston College is coming off back-to-back upset wins over Pitt and Georgia Tech. Since getting beat by Cincinnati in the opener (a result that doesn't look THAT bad at the moment), the Eagles have covered the spread in all five games against FBS-level opponents. Bill O'Brien may have found a diamond in the rough with QB Mason McKenzie. The former Saginaw Valley State transfer ran for 170 yards and two touchdowns last week against the Yellow Jackets. We successfully played the under in Duke's game against Virginia last week, and we'll go back to the same well. McKenzie is a dynamic playmaker that is fun to watch, but the Eagles still have plenty of room for improvement against good defenses, and we would put Duke in that category. Boston College scored 15 points at Syracuse, 14 points at home against Virginia Tech and 16 points at SMU. Even though this point spread is very similar to the ones that Boston College just saw against Pitt and Georgia Tech, Duke is in a tier above those teams, in our opinion. If McKenzie can lead another upset with a strong offensive performance, then the Eagles will have our full attention.
Play the Under
| Boston College | 30.7 / 24.3 | +6.3 | 32 | 21 | +11.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Duke | 21.3 / 22.7 | -1.3 | 20 | 24 | -1.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Boston College | 10-24 | @ Georgia T. | +6.5 | 50 | 49-27 | Duke | 10-23 | @ Virginia | +2.5 | 47 | 19-16 |
| | 10-17 | Pittsburg. | +6.5 | 42.5 | 27-21 | | 10-17 | North Car. | -3 | 47 | 20-24 |
| | 10-03 | @ SMU | +21.5 | 55.5 | 16-25 | | 10-10 | @ Georgia T. | -4.5 | 45.5 | 25-28 |
| Boston College |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-2-1 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Cincinnati U | 7 | L | 15-34 | UN | 51.5 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | L | 0-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Rutgers | -3 | W | 28-21 | UN | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Maine | -37.5 | L | 22-16 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 16-0 | OV | | | W | 19-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Virginia Tech | 14.5 | W | 14-21 | UN | 45.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ SMU | 21.5 | W | 16-25 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-6 | OV | 13.5 | 13 | W | 10-13 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Pittsburgh U | 6.5 | W | 27-21 | OV | 42.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-12 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 14-12 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Georgia Tech | 6.5 | W | 49-27 | OV | 50 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 12-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Duke |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tulane | -9.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 51.5 | -3 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Illinois | 6 | W | 31-27 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Stanford | -10 | W | 35-7 | UN | 51.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | William & Mary | -42.5 | W | 62-7 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 38-7 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Tech | -4.5 | L | 25-28 | OV | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 10-14 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | North Carolina | -3 | L | 20-24 | UN | 47 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Virginia | 2.5 | W | 19-16 | UN | 47 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Virginia | 17 | 48 | 23.5 | | 20 | 22 | 4-1 / 0-2 | 3-2 / 0-1-1 | 2-3 / 0-2 | +24.2 / -20.5 | -17.5 / +5 |
| Wake Forest | 38 | -13.5 | 15(1) | -9.5 | 19 | 25 | 2-1 / 4-0 | 2-1 / 3-1 | 2-1 / 1-3 | +21 / +15.8 | -7.5 / -1.5 |
Wake Forest is 6-1 straight-up and against the spread in this ACC matchup, and Virginia's lone win came by one point (31-30 in September 2024).Wake Forest earned a 16-9 road win in Charlottesville last season in a game where the Demon Deacons finished with 203 total yards. We're expecting a little more production out of Jake Dickert's squad in this one. Wake Forest has been one of the best stories in the country this season with the Deacs' lone loss coming to Miami (no shame in that). Wake Forest isn't just beating its ACC opponents, the Deacs are bludgeoning them. Wake has won its last three games against Cal, NC State and Stanford by a combined margin of 136-24. Reuniting QB Gio Lopez with his former South Alabama coordinator was one of the best under-the-radar moves in college football during the offseason. After a rough season in Chapel Hill under Bill Belichick, Lopez looks like a completely different player in Dickert's system. Wake is coming off its bye week and the Deacs have a quirky game against FCS-level Merrimack next week, so there's no real look-ahead spot or anything like that. From a power ratings' perspective, this number is probably too high, but we've been playing against Virginia for the last month and we're not jumping off that train. In ACC losses to Florida State, SMU and Duke, Virginia has scored an average of 12.0 points per game. Beau Pribula is averaging 171.1 passing yards and 23.5 rushing yards per game this season. We're not sure what the Cavaliers had to pay to get him to come to Charlottesville during the offseason, but we're guessing the ROI has not been fruitful thus far. He hasn’t looked like the same player since the Week 0 win over NC State.
Play Wake Forest
| Virginia | 19 / 22.3 | -3.3 | 21 | 23 | -2 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Wake Forest | 45.3 / 8 | +37.3 | 19 | 26 | -9.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Virginia | 10-23 | Duke | -2.5 | 47 | 16-19 | Wake Forest | 10-17 | @ California | -10 | 54 | 41-7 |
| | 10-17 | @ SMU | +10 | 51 | 13-23 | | 10-10 | @ NC State | -3.5 | 56 | 38-14 |
| | 10-10 | Syracuse | -14 | 49 | 28-25 | | 10-03 | Stanford | -14.5 | 54 | 57-3 |
|
| 11-08-25 | Wake Forest | 16 | 48 | 12 | 40/140 | 9/23/0/64 | 1/0 |
| Virginia | 9 | -6.5 | 14 | 30/163 | 21/34/0/164 | 3/3 |
| Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:4-3-1 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:3-5-0 |
| 08-29-26 | NC State | -4 | W | 34-8 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -2.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Norfolk St | -47 | W | 59-3 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 28-3 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | West Virginia | -10.5 | L | 27-38 | OV | 51.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Delaware | -20 | W | 42-3 | UN | 52 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 11.5 | -10.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Florida State | 0 | L | 7-38 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0 | L | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Syracuse | -14 | L | 28-25 | OV | 49 | -2.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7 | L | 7-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ SMU | 10 | PK | 13-23 | UN | 51 | 3.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-23-26 | Duke | -2.5 | L | 16-19 | UN | 47 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 13-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wake Forest |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:6-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Akron | -28 | L | 38-16 | OV | 50.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -16.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | L | 38-36 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -1 | W | 17-10 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-18-26 | Miami Florida | 20 | W | 20-33 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 11 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Louisville | 11 | W | 30-27 | UN | 57.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 7 | W | 24-21 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Stanford | -14.5 | W | 57-3 | OV | 54 | -3.5 | W | 15-0 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 29-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ NC State | -3.5 | W | 38-14 | UN | 56 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ California | -10 | W | 41-7 | UN | 54 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -6 | W | 34-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Merrimack College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Minnesota U | 6 | 40 | 18 | | 20 | 16 | 4-1 / 1-1 | 4-1 / 1-1 | 1-4 / 2-0 | +14 / -12.5 | -10 / +5 |
| Indiana | 31 | -20.5 | 8(2) | -12 | 6 | 15 | 4-1 / 3-0 | 0-5 / 1-1-1 | 2-3 / 1-2 | +26.2 / +14 | -32 / -13.5 |
Minnesota has won-and-covered each of the last four meetings, but these Big Ten foes haven't played since November 2021. The Gophers earned a 13-10 upset win over Iowa as a 7.5-point home 'dog last week. Minnesota was only able to produce 209 total yards and 11 first downs on 3.4 yards per play. The Gophers went 2-for-15 on third down and had to punt nine times, but a +3 turnover differential helped Minnesota steal the win. That role as a mid-sized 'dog is where PJ Fleck has thrived. Minnesota beat Iowa as a 7.5-point 'dog, beat Michigan as a 6.5-point 'dog and beat Washington as a 12.5-point 'dog this season. This role against Indiana is a different story. The Gophers went 0-2 against the spread as a double-digit 'dog last year, losing by 39 at Ohio State and 29 at Oregon. The same was true in 2023 when Minnesota lost by 42 at home against Michigan and 34 at Ohio State. Fleck knows when to push the 'dog button, and he also knows when to row the boat home and live to fight another day. Indiana head coach Curt Cignetti raised some eyebrows last week (what else is new), when he didn't have a single player listed on Indiana's Big Ten injury report, yet said that QB Josh Hoover has been battling through injuries over the past couple weeks. Hoover did not complete a single pass in the second half against Michigan, but did eventually score the game-winning TD in overtime. After the game, Cignetti hinted that he was close to benching Hoover, but on Monday, Cignetti said that Hoover would be "fine and better" this week. We wish that we had a little more confidence in the Hoosiers' passing attack at the moment, but we can only look in Indiana's direction. We wouldn't be shocked if Indiana's defense pitched a shut-out in this contest. Also, the Hoosiers are on a bye next week. You better believe Cignetti is pushing every motivational button to ensure that his team doesn't get caught looking ahead to the week off.
Play Indiana
| Minnesota U | 15.3 / 21.7 | -6.3 | 20 | 19 | +4 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Indiana | 16 / 14 | +2 | 6 | 11 | -4.5 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 0-1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Minnesota U | 10-24 | Iowa | +7.5 | 41 | 13-10 | Indiana | 10-24 | @ Michigan | -7 | 43.5 | 13-6 |
| | 10-10 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | 48.5 | 13-41 | | 10-17 | Ohio State | +2.5 | 49.5 | 15-19 |
| | 10-03 | Michigan | +6.5 | 42 | 20-14 | | 10-10 | @ Nebraska | -9 | 48.5 | 20-17 |
| Minnesota U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-3-1 |
| 09-03-26 | Eastern Illinois | -42.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 52.5 | 0 | W | 14-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 35-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Mississippi St | 1 | L | 13-38 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | L | 6-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Akron | -22.5 | W | 41-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington U | 12 | W | 27-24 | OV | 45 | 2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 23 |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan | 6.5 | W | 20-14 | UN | 42 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 7-14 | P | 21 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | L | 13-41 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa | 7.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 41 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 4.5 | W | 3-3 | UN | 20.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-1 , PSR:1-6-1 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-5-1 | 1H SUR:6-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:0-7-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Texas | -40 | L | 52-16 | OV | 57.5 | -10.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -24 | L | 24-6 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Howard | -58.5 | L | 55-0 | UN | 68 | | W | 20-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Western Kentucky | -44.5 | L | 38-0 | UN | 58 | -13.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 14.5 | -26.5 | L | 14-0 | UN | 34.5 |
| 09-25-26 | Northwestern | -20.5 | L | 29-23 | OV | 49.5 | -6.5 | L | 2-0 | UN | 10.5 | -11.5 | W | 12-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rutgers | -24.5 | W | 47-15 | OV | 56 | -6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | W | 23-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Nebraska | -9 | L | 20-17 | UN | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | -5.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio State | 2.5 | L | 15-19 | UN | 49.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Michigan | -7 | PK | 13-6 | UN | 43.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | -4 | W | 6-0 | UN | 21 |
| 10-31-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Purdue | 17 | 55.5 | 25 | | 26 | 23 | 2-3 / 1-1 | 2-3 / 1-1 | 5-0 / 1-1 | 0 / -3.5 | -1 / +11.5 |
| Penn State | 31 | -10 | 19(3) | -9 | 16 | 15 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 1-2 / 0-2 | +18.8 / -2 | -18 / -7 |
Penn State has won each of the last 11 meetings, with the last one being a 49-10 home win in November 2024. The Nittany Lions have scored at least 34 points in each of the last six meetings and they've cleared the 500-yard mark in four of those contests. Both teams are coming off a bye week. Penn State is looking to snap a four-game losing skid, but the Nittany Lions did play fairly well in losses to USC and Michigan. Penn State's four-game losing skid correlates with a four-game absence from star receiver Koby Howard, who continues to recover from a leg injury. Head coach Matt Campbell sounded cautiously optimistic that Howard would be cleared to return this week as Penn State's offense has struggled mightily without him. After picking up back-to-back wins over Illinois and Minnesota, Purdue came back to earth with a thorough home loss to Washington before the break. Barry Odom is doing a nice job in his second season in West Lafayette, but we need to see the Boilermakers find success on the road before we can fully Boiler up. With all due respect to the fine folks in Westwood and Champaign–Urbana, a trip to Beaver Stadium is going to look and feel a little different than Purdue's first two road games at Illinois and UCLA. This is certainly not the debut season that Campbell was hoping for in Happy Valley, but a 7-5 season is still firmly on the table with some comfortable games against Rutgers and Maryland still on the horizon. Campbell can still salvage some pieces from this season, but that turnaround needs to happen ASAP.
Play Penn State
| Purdue | 30.3 / 22.7 | +7.7 | 26 | 20 | +3 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Penn State | 18 / 28.7 | -10.7 | 17 | 16 | +1 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Purdue | 10-16 | Washingto. | -3 | 50.5 | 26-38 | Penn State | 10-17 | @ Michigan | +6 | 43 | 18-21 |
| | 10-10 | Minnesota. | +2.5 | 48.5 | 41-13 | | 10-10 | USC | PK | 54.5 | 23-31 |
| | 10-03 | @ Illinois | +9 | 62 | 24-17 | | 10-02 | @ Northwest. | -3 | 47 | 13-34 |
|
| 11-16-24 | Penn State | 49 | -30 | 23 | 34/234 | 22/27/0/305 | 0/0 |
| Purdue | 10 | 52 | 16 | 28/85 | 15/30/0/217 | 0/0 |
| Purdue |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Indiana State | -35 | L | 44-19 | OV | 56 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 16-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Wake Forest | 2.5 | W | 36-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 1 | L | 10-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ UCLA | 13.5 | L | 38-52 | OV | 53 | 4.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Notre Dame | 27 | L | 10-49 | OV | 57 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 16.5 | L | 0-35 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Illinois | 9 | W | 24-17 | UN | 62 | 2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 6 | W | 13-7 | UN | 31 |
| 10-10-26 | Minnesota U | 2.5 | W | 41-13 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-16-26 | Washington U | -3 | L | 26-38 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 17-24 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Penn State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-4-2 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Marshall | -23 | W | 45-0 | UN | 53.5 | -7 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Temple | -24 | L | 27-9 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | L | 10-3 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | Buffalo U | -40 | W | 55-13 | OV | 48.5 | -10.5 | W | 17-3 | OV | 13.5 | -24 | W | 34-6 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | Wisconsin | -9.5 | L | 20-24 | P | 44 | -2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6 | W | 17-7 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-02-26 | @ Northwestern | -3 | L | 13-34 | P | 47 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 23 |
| 10-10-26 | USC | 0 | L | 23-31 | UN | 54.5 | 0 | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | 17-17 | OV | 27 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan | 6 | W | 18-21 | UN | 43 | 1.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 21 |
| 10-31-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Clemson | 20 | 50.5 | 20.5 | | 18 | 20 | 3-2 / 1-1 | 1-4 / 1-1 | 2-3 / 1-1 | +5.6 / -13.5 | -10.5 / +4 |
| Florida State | 31 | -5 | 21(3) | -2.5 | 19 | 5 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 1-2-1 / 2-1 | 0-4 / 3-0 | +18 / -15.3 | -18.5 / +14 |
Clemson is 9-1 straight-up, 6-4 against the spread over the last ten meetings in this ACC series. The Tigers earned a 24-10 home win last season as a short home favorite. Each of the last three meetings have stayed under the total. Florida State is coming off its bye week and the Seminoles administration certainly didn't do the program many favors. University president Richard McCullough released a statement on Tuesday that didn't mince many words when it came to Mike Norvell and where this team is at. While he encouraged the Tallahassee faithful to continue to support the program, you don't hear many university presidents say, "We are not asking you to believe that everything is fine. We know it isn't," with an active staff in place trying to coach, recruit and carry on with business. It's a little peculiar that he felt the need to make those comments now with a month left in the season. Oh, by the way, the university also doesn't have an athletic director after Michael Alford was fired earlier this year. Things aren't much better in Clemson where the Tigers have lost their last two conference games against Miami and Virginia Tech. Freshman QB Tait Reynolds was the team's leading rusher last week, which is rarely a good sign for a Dabo Swinney-coached team. Trusting this Seminoles team is not easy, but what have you seen from Clemson's offense to suggest the Tigers can keep pace if/when they fall behind? Reynolds is averaging 6.1 yards per pass attempt, and if his confidence wasn't already a little shaken, former starter Christopher Vizzina is now healthy and available to return. When Vizzina was battling a shoulder injury last month, Reynolds knew that he had the keys to the offense. With the Tigers' season on the brink of collapse, there are whispers that Swinney could make a last-ditch effort to make the switch back to Vizzina. Either way, we're struggling to see how the Tigers' offense can keep up in this contest. Perhaps Norvell can turn Tuesday’s headlines into a backs-against-the-wall, us-against-the-world moment for the Seminoles.
Play Florida State
| Clemson | 22 / 20.3 | +1.7 | 20 | 26 | -10.5 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Florida State | 31 / 31.3 | -0.3 | 19 | 13 | +8 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Clemson | 10-24 | Virginia . | -2.5 | 50 | 16-20 | Florida State | 10-17 | @ Miami Flo. | +20.5 | 57 | 35-43 |
| | 10-17 | Charlesto. | -42.5 | 53 | 37-0 | | 10-09 | @ Louisville | +4 | 61 | 20-44 |
| | 10-03 | Miami Flo. | +14 | 49 | 13-41 | | 10-03 | Virginia | PK | 51.5 | 38-7 |
|
| 11-08-25 | Florida State | 10 | 57.5 | 19 | 26/110 | 23/43/1/250 | 1/1 |
| Clemson | 24 | -1.5 | 16 | 36/98 | 20/27/0/221 | 0/0 |
| Clemson |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ LSU | 10 | L | 10-51 | OV | 49 | 3 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia Southern | -19.5 | L | 22-7 | UN | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11 | L | 16-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | North Carolina | -3 | W | 28-20 | OV | 44.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 7.5 | -1.5 | L | 6-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ California | -2.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 52 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Miami Florida | 14 | L | 13-41 | OV | 49 | 3.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Charleston Southern | -42.5 | L | 37-0 | UN | 53 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 10-24-26 | Virginia Tech | -2.5 | L | 16-20 | UN | 50 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:1-4-1 |
| 08-29-26 | New Mexico State | -31 | L | 34-17 | UN | 53.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -18.5 | L | 17-7 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-07-26 | SMU | 3 | PK | 24-27 | UN | 52.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-17 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Alabama | 18 | W | 36-50 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 21-26 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Central Arkansas | -45.5 | L | 34-7 | UN | 63 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 24-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Virginia | 0 | W | 38-7 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 0 | W | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ Louisville | 4 | L | 20-44 | OV | 61 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | W | 14-14 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Miami Florida | 20.5 | W | 35-43 | OV | 57 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11.5 | W | 14-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Notre Dame | 45 | -31 | 3 | -30 | 3 | 16 | 3-0 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 1-2 / 3-0 | +40 / +15.3 | -38 / -19.5 |
| Navy | 17 | 54 | 33(0) | | 30 | 33 | 2-1 / 0-4 | 1-2 / 1-3 | 3-0 / 2-2 | +8.3 / -5.3 | -10.5 / -1 |
This is a neutral site game at Gillette Stadium in Foxboro, home of the Patriots. Since Navy's 28-27 upset win in 2016, Notre Dame has won the last eight meetings by an average of 25.9 points per game. The Irish have won-and-covered each of the last three meetings. Notre Dame out-gained Navy 502-228 in last year's 49-10 win. Notre Dame is coming off its bye week after previously falling at BYU. That game went down to the final second (literally), but the Irish were unable to come away with the victory. Even though this is a series that Notre Dame has dominated in recent years, it falls on a tricky spot in the Irish schedule. Notre Dame hosts Miami (Fla) next week with all kinds of playoff/revenge/Heisman scenarios at play. How much time did the Irish spend on Navy during the bye week, and how much time was spent watching Darian Mensah and Malachi Toney? Navy has lost five of its last six contests, and the lone win over Tulsa required a furious fourth quarter comeback. The over is 5-2 in Navy's games this season as the Midshipmen have allowed 38 points to Florida Atlantic, 38 points to UTSA and 49 points to North Texas. Some early money has shown on the over in this contest, and we tend to agree with it. During Notre Dame's eight-game winning streak in this series, Navy has scored an average of 15.5 points per game in defeat. That's not much, but if the Midshipmen can give us that on Saturday, the Irish can probably handle the rest.
Play the Over
| Notre Dame | 39.7 / 20.3 | +19.3 | 2 | 23 | -24 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Navy | 35.7 / 37.7 | -2 | 33 | 32 | +2 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Notre Dame | 10-17 | @ BYU | -10.5 | 47.5 | 24-28 | Navy | 10-24 | North Tex. | +3 | 60 | 39-49 |
| | 10-10 | Stanford | -40.5 | 55 | 58-7 | | 10-17 | @ Tex San A. | +5.5 | 53 | 34-38 |
| | 10-03 | @ North Car. | -21 | 46.5 | 37-26 | | 10-10 | Tulsa | -3 | 47.5 | 34-26 |
|
| 11-08-25 | Navy | 10 | 54.5 | 13 | 45/206 | 3/10/0/22 | 1/0 |
| Notre Dame | 49 | -31 | 23 | 35/252 | 16/19/0/253 | 0/0 |
| Notre Dame |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:6-1 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Wisconsin | -21.5 | W | 41-13 | OV | 46 | -6.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Rice | -44.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 54.5 | -13.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -26.5 | W | 42-0 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Michigan State | -29 | L | 27-10 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -17.5 | L | 17-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Purdue | -27 | W | 49-10 | OV | 57 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -16.5 | W | 35-0 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Carolina | -21 | L | 37-26 | OV | 46.5 | -5.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -11 | L | 21-14 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Stanford | -40.5 | W | 58-7 | OV | 55 | -7.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -23.5 | W | 37-0 | OV | 31 |
| 10-17-26 | @ BYU | -10.5 | L | 24-28 | OV | 47.5 | -2.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Navy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-6 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Towson | -31.5 | L | 42-15 | OV | 50.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-12 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | -4.5 | L | 30-38 | OV | 59.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | -3 | L | 7-31 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ UAB | -6.5 | L | 20-24 | UN | 50 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 13-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Air Force | 2.5 | L | 9-14 | UN | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Tulsa | -3 | W | 34-26 | OV | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 14-20 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | 5.5 | W | 34-38 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | W | 20-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | North Texas | 3 | L | 39-49 | OV | 60 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-28 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Carolina | 20 | 44 | 15 | | 17 | 13 | 3-2 / 1-1 | 2-3 / 1-1 | 4-1 / 1-1 | +17.6 / -6 | -17.5 / +11 |
| Oklahoma | 19 | -3.5 | 16.5(3) | -1.5 | 12 | 20 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 1-2 / 1-2 | 0-3 / 1-2 | +17 / -9 | -23 / +1.5 |
The road team has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings in this budding SEC rivalry. South Carolina earned a 35-9 road win in Norman in 2024 and the Sooners returned the favor with a 26-7 win in Columbia last season. Both teams are coming off wins last week as Oklahoma won at Mississippi State, while South Carolina handled Tennessee. Shane Beamer's seat has cooled off just a bit after back-to-back wins over the Gators and Vols. LaNorris Sellers is playing with some renewed confidence, throwing for 210 yards and a touchdown last week against Tennessee while adding 96 yards and two touchdowns on the ground. Do we trust South Carolina to carry this momentum on the road? Not really. But at the same time, can you trust Oklahoma's offense to score enough points to win by a touchdown? Also, no. Sooners' QB John Mateer had arguably his best game of the season last week against Mississippi State and it was still a chore for Oklahoma to earn an eight-point win against a back-up QB. Oklahoma scored ten points against Michigan, 14 points against New Mexico, 13 points against Georgia and 13 points against Kentucky. They only scored one offensive touchdown against Texas as the other two scores came off a blocked punt and an interception return for a touchdown. When everything is clicking on South Carolina's side, the Gamecocks have a higher ceiling than Oklahoma. The South Carolina team that showed up against Florida and most of the game against Tennessee is capable of pulling off the upset in this game. Let's hope that version gets on the plane to Norman this weekend, and not the one that showed up to Alabama.
Play South Carolina
| South Carolina | 33 / 26 | +7 | 19 | 14 | +1.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Oklahoma | 21 / 20 | +1 | 13 | 14 | -0.5 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| South Carolina | 10-24 | Tennessee. | -2.5 | 50.5 | 27-24 | Oklahoma | 10-24 | @ Mississip. | -2 | 49 | 23-15 |
| | 10-10 | @ Florida | +10 | 59.5 | 38-19 | | 10-17 | Kentucky | -7 | 44.5 | 13-21 |
| | 10-03 | Kentucky | -2.5 | 53 | 34-35 | | 10-10 | Texas | +7.5 | 41 | 27-24 |
|
| 10-18-25 | Oklahoma | 26 | -4.5 | 20 | 40/171 | 19/27/0/148 | 0/0 |
| South Carolina | 7 | 42.5 | 15 | 34/54 | 21/33/2/170 | 0/0 |
| South Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Kent State | -35.5 | W | 57-0 | OV | 53 | -9.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21 | W | 29-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Towson | -44.5 | L | 45-9 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Mississippi St | -3.5 | L | 34-41 | OV | 60 | -0.5 | W | 13-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 23-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Alabama | 11.5 | L | 18-49 | OV | 53 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | L | 10-35 | OV | 27 |
| 10-03-26 | Kentucky | -2.5 | L | 34-35 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Florida | 10 | W | 38-19 | UN | 59.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | W | 17-10 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Tennessee U | -2.5 | W | 27-24 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 17-21 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oklahoma |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-04-26 | UTEP | -41 | W | 51-0 | UN | 51.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 12.5 | -24 | W | 27-0 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Michigan | -5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 43.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 0-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | New Mexico | -21.5 | L | 14-6 | UN | 45.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -12.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia | 11 | L | 13-41 | OV | 44 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 7 | L | 0-28 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Texas | 7.5 | W | 27-24 | OV | 41 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 4 | L | 7-17 | OV | 20 |
| 10-17-26 | Kentucky | -7 | L | 13-21 | UN | 44.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 7.5 | -4 | L | 10-7 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Mississippi St | -2 | W | 23-15 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0 | W | 10-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/27 10:10 pm |
| Missouri | 27 | -10.5 | 15 | -8 | 15 | 8 | 4-0 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 1-2 | +24.8 / -6 | -20.5 / +1 |
| Arkansas | 24 | 48.5 | 25(2) | | 23 | 20 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 1-2 | +2.5 / -16.7 | -2.5 / +11 |
Missouri has won-and-covered each of the last four meetings, including a 31-17 road win at Arkansas last season. Both teams are coming off bye weeks. While the rest was probably nice for the Razorbacks, first-year head coach Ryan Silverfield probably would have liked to ride the wave of momentum for one more week. Silverfield earned his first SEC win as Arkansas took care of Vanderbilt before the break. The Razorbacks have covered the spread in three of their last four games, showing slow incremental improvement for the rebuilding program. Arkansas' top receiver Chris Marshall is expected to play in this contest. Marshall suffered a leg injury against Vanderbilt in Week 7, but is expected to be cleared for this one. Through the Razorbacks' first six games, Marshall was averaging 7.0 receptions and 95.5 yards per game. If you read the New Mexico State-Jacksonville State preview on Wednesday, we share similar thoughts on Missouri as we had on the Aggies. Missouri's 5-2 record looks nice, but the Tigers caught Kansas QB Isaiah Marshall in his first spot against an FBS-level opponent. They caught Florida the week after the Gators earned a thrilling win over Ole Miss. That 27-6 win over Texas A&M looked good at the time, but the Aggies are 4-4 and heading toward a disastrous season. So where are the results that would make you feel good about laying more than a touchdown with the Tigers? Missouri has lost its last two road games, and the Tigers weren't particularly good on the road last year, either. Outside of the recent success that Missouri has enjoyed in this matchup, we're struggling to find other reasons to justify the Tigers laying double digits in this contest.
Play Arkansas
10/26 2:06 PM PDT — Arkansas' top receiver Chris Marshall is expected to play in this contest. Marshall suffered a leg injury against Vanderbilt in Week 7, but is expected to be cleared for this contest. Through the Razorbacks' first six games, Marshall was averaging 7.0 receptions and 95.5 yards per game.
| Missouri | 25 / 18 | +7 | 15 | 10 | +1.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Arkansas | 18.3 / 26.3 | -8 | 25 | 15 | +11 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Missouri | 10-17 | @ Mississip. | +4 | 57 | 3-31 | Arkansas | 10-17 | @ Vanderbilt | +5.5 | 48.5 | 31-21 |
| | 10-10 | Texas A&M | -4.5 | 50.5 | 27-6 | | 10-10 | Tennessee. | +13.5 | 51 | 17-24 |
| | 10-03 | Florida | +5.5 | 58 | 45-17 | | 10-03 | @ Texas A&M | +13.5 | 51 | 7-34 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Missouri | 31 | -4.5 | 26 | 58/322 | 4/7/0/25 | 2/1 |
| Arkansas | 17 | 54.5 | 15 | 25/61 | 17/30/0/185 | 1/0 |
| 11-30-24 | Arkansas | 21 | 51 | 23 | 35/148 | 21/35/0/229 | 3/2 |
| Missouri | 28 | -3 | 18 | 47/193 | 10/20/0/168 | 1/0 |
| Missouri |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Arkansas Pine Bluff | -55.5 | L | 54-14 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 40-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | @ Kansas | -4.5 | W | 38-21 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | L | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Troy | -26.5 | L | 27-17 | UN | 49.5 | -7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -15 | L | 24-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Mississippi St | 3.5 | L | 24-31 | UN | 58.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Florida | 5.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 58 | 0.5 | W | 3-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | W | 20-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Texas A&M | -4.5 | W | 27-6 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 10-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Mississippi | 4 | L | 3-31 | UN | 57 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | L | 3-21 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-3-1 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Alabama | -40.5 | L | 31-14 | UN | 63.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Utah | 13.5 | L | 10-43 | UN | 55.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | L | 3-29 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia | 24.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | L | 3-21 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Tulsa | -7 | W | 34-6 | UN | 51 | -2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 16-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Texas A&M | 13.5 | L | 7-34 | UN | 51 | 3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 7-24 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Tennessee U | 13.5 | W | 17-24 | UN | 51 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | PK | 0-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 5.5 | W | 31-21 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | W | 14-14 | OV | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/27 10:10 pm |
| Coastal Carolina | 29 | 56 | 39.5 | -4 | 42 | 39 | 1-3 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 1-2 | +2.8 / -3 | -8 / +10 |
| Georgia State | 24 | -3.5 | 44.5(1) | | 46 | 40 | 3-0 / 1-3 | 3-0 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 3-1 | +34 / -8.3 | -12.5 / +7.5 |
Coastal Carolina has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings, including a 40-27 home win over the Panthers last season. Four of the last five meetings have gone over the total. The Chants are coming off their bye week with extra time to prep for this one after previously falling 35-32 at home against App State. We've been lower than the rest of the betting market on Georgia State all season, and it feels like the tide is beginning to slowly turn in our direction. The Panthers return home after suffering back-to-back losses at James Madison and Arkansas State. We don't want to take ANYTHING away from what Georgia State has accomplished this season (cleared their season win total of 3.5 by Week 5), but we really struggled to see why they closed as a 2.5-point road favorite at Arkansas State last week. The Panthers played hard, but the RedWolves were in control of that contest for most of the way. Georgia State QB Cameran Brown is listed as questionable on the Panthers' early-week injury reports. Brown was limited to just ten pass attempts in last week's loss at Arkansas State. We're at the point of the season where attrition matters and bumps-and-bruises add up. Georgia State is not a deep team, and they just played back-to-back road games against two physical opponents while Coastal Carolina is coming off its bye. Again, the Panthers deserve plenty of credit for what they have accomplished, but Old Dominion is 2-6, Northern Illinois is 0-7 and Kennesaw is 1-6. How much credit are we giving the Panthers for those wins?!
Play Coastal Carolina
10/26 2:07 PM PDT — Georgia State QB Cameran Brown is listed as questionable on the Panthers' early-week injury reports. Brown was limited to just ten pass attempts in last week's loss at Arkansas State.
| Coastal Carolina | 27.7 / 29 | -1.3 | 43 | 40 | +2.5 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Georgia State | 32 / 32.3 | -0.3 | 42 | 35 | +1.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Coastal Carolina | 10-16 | Appalachi. | PK | 48.5 | 32-35 | Georgia State | 10-24 | @ Arkansas . | -2.5 | 58.5 | 32-38 |
| | 10-10 | @ Marshall | +4.5 | 58 | 27-21 | | 10-17 | @ James Mad. | +8 | 58 | 22-49 |
| | 10-03 | Georgia S. | +2.5 | 53 | 24-31 | | 10-03 | Old Domin. | -1 | 51.5 | 42-10 |
|
| 11-08-25 | Georgia State | 27 | 56.5 | 20 | 37/130 | 25/38/1/293 | 2/1 |
| Coastal Carolina | 40 | -7.5 | 19 | 47/324 | 11/18/0/120 | 1/0 |
| 11-30-24 | Coastal Carolina | 48 | 53 | 27 | 53/275 | 13/19/2/200 | 0/0 |
| Georgia State | 27 | -1 | 19 | 33/202 | 17/32/4/226 | 2/2 |
| Coastal Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ West Virginia | 21 | W | 24-31 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Fordham | -36.5 | W | 45-7 | UN | 54 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Delaware | 4.5 | L | 14-22 | UN | 56.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | W | 14-15 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-24-26 | Liberty | 2.5 | L | 17-34 | OV | 50 | 0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | W | 17-10 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Georgia Southern | 2.5 | L | 24-31 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 1 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Marshall | 4.5 | W | 27-21 | UN | 58 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | W | 13-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-16-26 | Appalachian St | 0 | L | 32-35 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 24-14 | OV | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | N. Carolina A&T | -28.5 | W | 59-10 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kennesaw State | 7.5 | W | 31-17 | UN | 55.5 | 2.5 | W | 6-3 | UN | 12.5 | 4.5 | W | 21-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Florida | 17.5 | W | 30-44 | OV | 50.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 24-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | No Illinois | -8.5 | W | 35-14 | UN | 56.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Old Dominion | -1 | W | 42-10 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ James Madison | 8 | L | 22-49 | OV | 58 | 3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 6 | L | 10-35 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arkansas St | -2.5 | L | 32-38 | OV | 58.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas | 23 | 46 | 22.5 | | 24 | 21 | 3-1 / 0-2 | 2-1-1 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 2-0 | +21 / -14 | -15.5 / +9.5 |
| TCU | 24 | -6 | 22(2) | -2.5 | 20 | 29 | 2-2 / 1-1 | 2-2 / 1-1 | 1-3 / 0-2 | +17.3 / +1.5 | -17 / 0 |
TCU is 5-0 straight-up, 4-1 against the spread over the last five meetings, but the Horned Frogs and Jayhawks did not meet last season. TCU earned a 38-27 road win in Lawrence in their last meeting in September 2024. Hey, the Jayhawks and Horned Frogs can share one thing in common because these teams were responsible for Dave Aranda's last two losses as Baylor's head coach. TCU got things started with a 17-6 road win in Waco two weeks ago and Kansas finished the job with a 25-24 home win last season. Now the weird question: Will either of these two coaches be joining Aranda on the couch? Sonny Dykes on the hot seat didn't feel like something that was on the radar this season, but the temperature is rising in Fort Worth. Dykes fired co-offensive coordinator AJ Ricker on Sunday after the Horned Frogs were only able to score 20 points at home against one of the worst defenses in college football (West Virginia) last week. With games against Arizona, Kansas State and Utah on the horizon, Dykes needs this one to keep the season afloat. TCU generated 29 first downs and nearly 500 yards on offense last week against the Mountaineers, but turned the ball over three times. Harvard transfer Jaden Craig has thrown at least one interception in each of his last five starts. Speaking of interceptions, Kansas QB Isaiah Marshall threw two last week against the Bears as he goes through growing pains in his first year at the helm. In a matchup of two shaky quarterbacks, we want the six-point head start. TCU failed to cover the spread by 12.5 points vs North Carolina, 11.5 points vs UCF and 14.5 points vs West Virginia. The Frogs have a way to go before they gain our trust as a favorite.
Play Kansas
| Kansas | 24.3 / 33.3 | -9 | 24 | 17 | +6 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| TCU | 15.7 / 15.7 | 0 | 21 | 20 | -0.5 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Kansas | 10-24 | Baylor | -1 | 54.5 | 25-24 | TCU | 10-24 | West Virg. | -10 | 58.5 | 20-24 |
| | 10-17 | @ Kansas St. | +3 | 55 | 24-35 | | 10-17 | @ Baylor | +3.5 | 50.5 | 17-6 |
| | 10-10 | @ Utah | +15.5 | 49.5 | 24-41 | | 10-03 | BYU | +5 | 49 | 10-17 |
| Kansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-4-1 , O/U:4-2-1 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:4-0-1 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Long Island | -44.5 | W | 51-6 | P | 57 | | W | 6-0 | OV | | | W | 30-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | Missouri | 4.5 | L | 21-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | W | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Arizona State | 5.5 | L | 17-24 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | PK | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Middle Tenn St | -21.5 | W | 55-0 | OV | 51 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -11.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Utah | 15.5 | L | 24-41 | OV | 49.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 17-21 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Kansas State | 3 | L | 24-35 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 13.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-18 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | Baylor | -1 | PK | 25-24 | UN | 54.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | 7-7 | UN | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| TCU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:0-5-1 |
| 08-29-26 | North Carolina | -7.5 | L | 10-15 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | L | 10-12 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Grambling | -44.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Arkansas St | -19 | W | 31-7 | UN | 56.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Central Florida | -3.5 | L | 13-21 | UN | 48 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2 | L | 10-14 | P | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | BYU | 5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 7-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Baylor | 3.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-6 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | West Virginia | -10 | L | 20-24 | UN | 58.5 | -1.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 30 |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana Tech | 38 | -6 | 33.5 | -7.5 | 37 | 45 | 4-0 / 1-2 | 3-1 / 3-0 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +25.8 / -8 | -15.5 / +14 |
| South Alabama | 27 | 58 | 42(1) | | 42 | 44 | 3-0 / 1-3 | 2-1 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 3-1 | +15.7 / -7 | -11 / +8 |
This is the first meeting between the Jaguars and Bulldogs since South Alabama earned a 38-14 home win in September 2022. The Jags return home with some extra time to prep after splitting back-to-back road games at Arkansas State (win) and Marshall (loss). Louisiana Tech has been one of the country's best teams at the betting window this season, going 6-1 against the spread. The lone loss came by less than a field goal (beat Louisiana by one as a 3.5-point favorite). The Bulldogs didn't have to break much of a sweat in last week's 26-0 home win over Old Dominion. In fact, that's been the case two weeks in a row because La Tech also beat UL-Monroe 24-0 the week prior. We're interested to see how South Alabama's offense - and namely starting QB Jared Hollins - perform over the next few weeks. The Jaguars made the somewhat-curious decision to bench starter Bishop Davenport in favor of Hollins earlier this season. He performed admirably when thrust into the role, but now that the Sun Belt has tape on Hollins, opponents may have a better gameplan for the Jaguars' offense. Hollins went 12-of-33 for 148 passing yards with no touchdowns and one interception against Marshall. That's not going to cut it against a defense that hasn't allowed a point over the last two weeks.
Play Louisiana Tech
| Louisiana Tech | 27.3 / 10.3 | +17 | 36 | 44 | -10 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| South Alabama | 40.3 / 34.7 | +5.7 | 41 | 45 | -4 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Louisiana Tech | 10-24 | Old Domin. | -13.5 | 44 | 26-0 | South Alabama | 10-20 | @ Marshall | -2 | 66.5 | 13-20 |
| | 10-17 | @ UL Monroe | -13.5 | 56 | 24-0 | | 10-08 | @ Arkansas . | +3 | 60.5 | 56-49 |
| | 10-10 | Louisiana | -3 | 48 | 32-31 | | 10-03 | UL Monroe | -13 | 56.5 | 52-35 |
| Louisiana Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:1-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northwestern State | -44.5 | W | 80-6 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 63-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ LSU | 34.5 | W | 14-45 | OV | 55 | 9.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 21.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Baylor | 20.5 | W | 19-36 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 11.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Army | 0 | W | 31-29 | OV | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | W | 14-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Louisiana | -3 | L | 32-31 | OV | 48 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ UL Monroe | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 56 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 29 |
| 10-24-26 | Old Dominion | -13.5 | W | 26-0 | UN | 44 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -7 | W | 17-0 | UN | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-2-1 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:4-1-1 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Louisiana | -13.5 | W | 39-14 | UN | 54 | | W | 19-7 | OV | | | W | 22-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Tulane | 10 | W | 24-28 | OV | 48 | 3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | 6.5 | W | 10-14 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | Ohio | -7 | L | 41-36 | OV | 49.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kentucky | 20.5 | L | 21-45 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | UL Monroe | -13 | W | 52-35 | OV | 56.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | W | 31-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Arkansas St | 3 | W | 56-49 | OV | 60.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | 1.5 | W | 34-28 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-20-26 | @ Marshall | -2 | L | 13-20 | UN | 66.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-6 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/27 11:11 pm |
| Arizona U | 23 | 55 | 18.5 | | 18 | 26 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 2-1 | +29 / +6.7 | -22 / -2.5 |
| Texas Tech | 31 | -4 | 11.5(3) | -10 | 10 | 27 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +22 / +6.7 | -26 / -17 |
The Red Raiders and Wildcats have only met once in the last six seasons - A 28-22 Texas Tech win in October 2024. The Red Raiders' unbeaten season came to a close last week in Cincinnati where the Bearcats dominated Texas Tech. We bought into a mini-resurgence from the Raiders after their bye week and a 28-point win over Arizona State, but that belief was short-lived. Arizona has won each of its last five games, including a victory over the aforementioned Bearcats. The Wildcats earned a 39-3 home win over Iowa State last week. Texas Tech running back Cameron Dickey is expected to return this week after missing the Red Raiders' last two games with an ankle injury. Dickey ran for 1,124 yards with 16 touchdowns last season. This is going to be one of those "Fool me once, fool me twice..." situations, but we're going back to the well with Texas Tech. This point spread essentially suggests that the Wildcats and Red Raiders are equal teams with Tech getting a small bump for home field. We're not ready to get on board with that quite yet. Again, we know that adjustments need to be made, but we have some common data points between these teams. Texas Tech just closed as a double-digit road favorite at Cincinnati last week, while Arizona was only a 6.5-point home favorite against the Bearcats three weeks prior. So just by moving the home field advantages around between Arizona, Cincinnati and Texas Tech, the Red Raiders were about nine points better than the Wildcats in the betting market just a couple of weeks ago. We're struggling to justify the gap closing THAT much after a couple results.
Play Texas Tech
10/26 2:08 PM PDT — Texas Tech running back Cameron Dickey is expected to return this week after missing the Red Raiders' last two games with an ankle injury. Dickey ran for 1,124 yards with 16 touchdowns last season.
| Arizona U | 41.7 / 13.7 | +28 | 19 | 26 | -7.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Texas Tech | 35.3 / 23 | +12.3 | 10 | 27 | -14 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Arizona U | 10-24 | Iowa State | -12 | 51.5 | 39-3 | Texas Tech | 10-24 | @ Cincinnat. | -11 | 58 | 24-37 |
| | 10-10 | @ West Virg. | -3.5 | 61.5 | 52-31 | | 10-17 | Arizona S. | -17 | 50 | 53-25 |
| | 10-03 | Cincinnat. | -7 | 56.5 | 34-7 | | 10-03 | @ Colorado | -13.5 | 50.5 | 29-7 |
| Arizona U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1H SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northern Arizona | -33.5 | L | 35-7 | UN | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ BYU | 6.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 48.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | No Illinois | -34.5 | L | 42-17 | OV | 50 | -7.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington State | -11 | L | 34-24 | OV | 47 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Cincinnati U | -7 | W | 34-7 | UN | 56.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ West Virginia | -3.5 | W | 52-31 | OV | 61.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -1.5 | W | 24-17 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa State | -12 | W | 39-3 | UN | 51.5 | -2.5 | W | 15-3 | OV | 9.5 | -7 | W | 25-3 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Abilene Christian | -45 | L | 33-10 | UN | 60.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Oregon State | -26 | L | 35-24 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -14.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-18-26 | Houston U | -8 | L | 28-26 | OV | 52.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 14-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Sam Houston St | -34.5 | W | 49-14 | OV | 55.5 | -7.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 21-14 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Colorado | -13.5 | W | 29-7 | UN | 50.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Arizona State | -17 | W | 53-25 | OV | 50 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 9.5 | -9 | W | 43-10 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Cincinnati U | -11 | L | 24-37 | OV | 58 | -3.5 | L | 6-3 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 6-24 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oklahoma State | 35 | -10 | 21 | -1.5 | 22 | 29 | 4-0 / 1-2 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +28.5 / 0 | -13.5 / -2 |
| Iowa State | 20 | 58 | 25.5(3) | | 27 | 19 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 1-2-1 / 1-2 | 3-1 / 0-3 | +16.3 / -17.7 | -12 / +12.5 |
Don’t look now, but the Big XII race has turned into a wild west rodeo, with five teams hanging within a game of first place Utah into Halloween and five others a strong stretch drive at Lone Star Park away from perhaps sneaking into the conference title game at Arlington in early December. One of those lurking menacingly (most menacingly, say some Big XII insiders) with only one conference loss is Eric Morris and his potent Oklahoma State bunch that reminded of what damage it is capable when dropping a 34-0 bomb on Colorado in the second half of what turned into a 57-24 laugher at Stillwater last Saturday over Deion and his bumbling Buffs. Of course, we’d seen Morris and his QB Drew Mestemaker do this sort of thing a year ago at North Texas when the Mean Green were the nation’s highest-scoring team at 45.1 points per game. Now they’re up to the same sorts of tricks with the Cowboys, as Mestemaker is on course for another 4,000-yard passing campaign with a one-and-a-half season TD pass count now up to a staggering 54. And while the defense isn’t the college version of the Seattle Seahawks, the many portal adds being utilized by coordinator Skyler Cassity (also along with Morris and others from Denton) is representative enough to not get run off the field like last year’s pre-Morris platoon that allowed almost 420 yards per game. Meanwhile, there hasn’t been the same sort of whiplash turnaround at Ames, nor was it expected after Iowa State had been a bowl qualifier most recent years for Matt Campbell, but the effective expansion team (83 newcomers) on the Cyclones roster that was hollowed out after Campbell’s move to Happy Valley is proving a difficult juggling act for new head coach Jimmy Rogers. With Arkansas State transfer QB Jaylen Raynor not the big-play threat he was in the Sun Belt, ISU’s offense has mostly been reduced to the occasional explosive play from holdover RB Aiden Flora (716 rushing yards), who has been a nice revelation. Most Power 4 defenses, however, have been able to keep ISU in check, with the Cyclones ranking well up the track nationally (in the 120s) in three-and-outs, third-down conversions, and 4th-down conversions, while on the other side of the ball, an absence of a consistent pass rush and defensive pressures suggests trouble vs. Mestemaker. As long as the Cowboys avoid the sorts of slow starts that put them into an early hole in their two losses on the road at Tulsa and Houston, we have a hard time envisioning the Cyclones (just 13 points across the past two games) keeping pace. Also don’t forget what happened when these coaches faced off last season, when Morris and his North Texas ran Rogers and his Washington State off the field in a 58-10 Mean Green romp in Denton.
Play Oklahoma State
| Oklahoma State | 43.7 / 29 | +14.7 | 22 | 24 | -6.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Iowa State | 19.3 / 35 | -15.7 | 26 | 21 | +7 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Oklahoma State | 10-24 | Colorado | -13 | 55.5 | 57-24 | Iowa State | 10-24 | @ Arizona U | +12 | 51.5 | 3-39 |
| | 10-17 | @ Houston U | +4 | 62 | 32-35 | | 10-09 | @ BYU | +11.5 | 46.5 | 10-24 |
| | 10-10 | Central F. | -10 | 53.5 | 42-28 | | 10-03 | West Virg. | -3 | 53 | 45-42 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Iowa State | 20 | -14 | 17 | 48/231 | 9/18/0/113 | 2/1 |
| Oklahoma State | 13 | 46.5 | 12 | 23/27 | 23/34/1/202 | 4/1 |
| Oklahoma State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-6 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Tulsa | -12.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 57.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 3-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Oregon | 24 | W | 39-31 | OV | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | W | 24-17 | OV | 30 |
| 09-19-26 | Murray State | -55.5 | W | 59-0 | UN | 70 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ West Virginia | 2 | W | 41-24 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13 | 0.5 | L | 13-14 | UN | 31 |
| 10-10-26 | Central Florida | -10 | W | 42-28 | OV | 53.5 | -2.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 21-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Houston U | 4 | W | 32-35 | OV | 62 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 31.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Colorado | -13 | W | 57-24 | OV | 55.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | L | 23-24 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-4-1 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Missouri St | -29.5 | L | 38-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Iowa | 14 | W | 13-16 | UN | 42.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Bowling Green | -22.5 | W | 55-7 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | W | 35-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Utah | 7.5 | L | 17-31 | OV | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 4.5 | L | 3-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | West Virginia | -3 | PK | 45-42 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ BYU | 11.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 7 | L | 3-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona U | 12 | L | 3-39 | UN | 51.5 | 2.5 | L | 3-15 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 3-25 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona State | 13 | 46.5 | 23.5 | | 24 | 19 | 3-1 / 0-2 | 2-2 / 0-2 | 2-2 / 2-0 | +14 / -28 | -16.5 / +16 |
| BYU | 34 | -17 | 15(3) | -11.5 | 14 | 27 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-1 | +21.3 / +5.7 | -14.5 / -10 |
When Arizona State was over in London to play Kansas last month, the Sun Devils might have simply decided to stay and play home games at Wimbledon. After all, there’s been more back-and-forth in ASU’s performances this season than the Jannik Sinner-Nuno Borges final last July, as Kenny Dillingham’s bunch has been alternating wins and losses from the outset. There’s a bipolar element to ASU’s campaign, too, as the Sun Devils have taken some frightful beatings (losses by 28 at Texas A&M, 36 at home vs. Baylor, and 28 at Texas Tech), though interspersed with their every-other-game wins, and true frosh RB Cardae Mack (154+ rushing yards in two of the last three games) emerging as a new force. Still, this might be a bad weekend upcoming for Sparky the mascot and anyone else from Tempe who wants to trek to Provo as, if form holds, ASU is due another thumping defeat. A more substantial argument for host BYU is that the Cougars are angered after their own gut-wrencher of a loss last week at UCF that spoiled what had been an undefeated record and a rousing win over Notre Dame in their last game at Provo on October 17. Kalani Sitake’s big and brawling Cougar defense also might be taking aim at a freshman QB making his first start for the Sun Devils, Jake Fette, who came out of the bullpen to replace an injured Mikey Keene and an ineffective (once again) Kentucky transfer Cutter Boley while leading a pair of late TD drives to outscore Kansas State last Saturday. As the Wildcats were minus their own livewire QB, Avery Johnson, ASU’s task was made a bit easier a week ago, but BYU’s playmaker QB Bear Bachmeier (already accounting for 18 TDs this season) is ready to go and might get top rusher LJ Martin (1,305 rushing yards a year ago) back to active duty after he's been out since twisting an ankle back on October 3 at Fort Worth vs. TCU. Finally, we might be remiss if not at least noting the possible lookahead to the Utah showdown next week for the Cougars, but suspect there is little chance of Sitake allowing any overlook of ASU after last week’s loss in Orlando.
Play BYU
10/26 1:40 PM PDT — BYU running back LJ Martin is questionable to return this week as he recovers from an ankle injury. Cougars' head coach Kalani Sitake said Martin was "getting closer" but didn't offer a timeline on his potential return. Martin has missed each of the last three games.
10/27 3:04 AM PDT — The Sun Devils turned to true freshman QB Jake Fette in the second half last week vs. Kansas State after recently-promoted starter Mikey Keene left the game with a leg injury and Kentucky transfer (and former starter) Cutter Boley was once more ineffective, this time in relief. Fette, a highly-touted frosh, directed a pair of late TD drives to get ASU over the hump last Saturday in a 28-17 win. Word from Tempe is that head coach Kenny Dillingham is waiting until alter in the week to announce QB plans for this week's trip to Provo.
| Arizona State | 27.7 / 27.3 | +0.3 | 24 | 23 | -1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| BYU | 27.7 / 24.3 | +3.3 | 15 | 18 | -3 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Arizona State | 10-24 | Kansas St. | +1 | 51.5 | 28-17 | BYU | 10-24 | @ Central F. | -7.5 | 44 | 31-39 |
| | 10-17 | @ Texas Tech | +17 | 50 | 25-53 | | 10-17 | Notre Dame | +10.5 | 47.5 | 28-24 |
| | 10-10 | Hawaii | -20.5 | 51 | 30-12 | | 10-09 | Iowa State | -11.5 | 46.5 | 24-10 |
|
| 11-23-24 | BYU | 23 | 49 | 26 | 23/94 | 22/38/2/297 | 0/0 |
| Arizona State | 28 | -3.5 | 22 | 44/154 | 16/25/1/247 | 1/0 |
| Arizona State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-3-1 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Morgan State | -43.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 28-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas A&M | 14.5 | L | 20-48 | OV | 51.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas | -5.5 | W | 24-17 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | PK | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Baylor | -3 | L | 19-55 | OV | 49.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 13-24 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Hawaii | -20.5 | L | 30-12 | UN | 51 | -5.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -11.5 | L | 17-6 | UN | 27 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas Tech | 17 | L | 25-53 | OV | 50 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 9.5 | 9 | L | 10-43 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Kansas State | 1 | W | 28-17 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 14-10 | UN | 26 |
| 10-31-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| BYU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Dixie State | -50.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona U | -6.5 | W | 28-17 | UN | 48.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Colorado State | -17.5 | W | 41-23 | OV | 55 | -4.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 11.5 | -9.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ TCU | -5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 7-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-09-26 | Iowa State | -11.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7 | W | 14-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Notre Dame | 10.5 | W | 28-24 | OV | 47.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Florida | -7.5 | L | 31-39 | OV | 44 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -4 | L | 14-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Connecticut | 21 | 52.5 | 38 | | 40 | 49 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 1-2 | +10.8 / +13 | -4 / +1 |
| Air Force | 20 | -2 | 37(3) | -4 | 35 | 45 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 1-2 | +10.8 / +3.3 | -8 / -6 |
Air Force QBs might find it safer to stay in the cockpit of F-15s rather than on the football field after Evan Medders became the second Falcon pilot to go down in last week’s painful loss at Wyoming. There’s a chance Medders, who had been doing a quite serviceable job replacing the previously-injured Liam Szarka, might return sometime in November from his toe injury, but Troy Calhoun is now down to senior Josh Johnson (who has started in the past) or freshman Howard Fisher IV before Falcon brass checks to see if Marty Louthan or any of the old option masters from the Kenny Hatfield or Fisher DeBerry years has any eligibility remaining. Air Force knows all about QB injuries against UConn after last year’s game at Pratt-Whitney in East Hartford when Szarka was KO’d with a knee injury and Calhoun had to resort to 245-lb converted FB Kemper Hodges to run the option in an eventual 26-16 loss. Of course, we’ll have to see how the visiting Huskies deal with this odd trip to 6,600 feet in Colorado Springs, but they’re two plays away from a five-game win streak for first-year head coach Jason Candle (ex-Toledo), who looks to have the 4-3 Huskies en route to another minor bowl. Candle’s fellow Toledo transfer QB Kalieb Osborne has been efficient as a capable dual-threat while tossing 12 TDs vs. just two picks, but the question as always at the foot of Pikes Peak is whether UConn has enough rush defense to slow the Calhoun offense despite the QB taking snaps for the Falcons. Yet having faced both Army and Air Force since last season, defending the option isn’t new territory for UConn, and rush defense numbers are more than respectable this fall (107.6 yards per game allowed, ranks 28th nationally). Even with a seemingly unending stream of signal-callers ready to run the Calhoun option, down to a third-stringer (at best) might be too much of a handicap vs. an underrated yet capable foe.
Play the Under
10/27 3:08 AM PDT — The Falcons were down to their third QB last week as senior Josh Johnson and freshman Howard FIsher IV had to take snaps at Wyoming following a toe injury suffered by first-stringer Evan Medders, himself in the lineup because normal-starter Liam Szarka went down for the season with a knee injury in the Navy game on October 3. Falcons' head coach Troy Calhoun is expected to announce a starter later in the week as Medders isn't expected to be available again until sometime in November.
| Connecticut | 36.7 / 26 | +10.7 | 40 | 38 | -0.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Air Force | 27.7 / 22 | +5.7 | 37 | 41 | -4.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Connecticut | 10-23 | Massachus. | -12 | 53.5 | 35-16 | Air Force | 10-23 | @ Wyoming | -7 | 46.5 | 14-28 |
| | 10-10 | @ Temple | +3.5 | 55.5 | 34-20 | | 10-17 | UNLV | PK | 48.5 | 41-31 |
| | 10-03 | Syracuse | +6.5 | 51.5 | 41-42 | | 10-10 | @ No Illino. | -6.5 | 48.5 | 28-7 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Air Force | 16 | 64.5 | 23 | 58/290 | 6/11/0/66 | 0/0 |
| Connecticut | 26 | -7.5 | 18 | 30/192 | 15/23/1/155 | 0/0 |
| Connecticut |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:5-0 , PSR:6-0 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lafayette | -21.5 | W | 56-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Maryland | 11 | L | 14-38 | UN | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 7 | L | 7-17 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ So Mississippi | -3.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 54.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 27-6 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Ohio | 2.5 | L | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Syracuse | 6.5 | W | 41-42 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-6 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 14-27 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Temple | 3.5 | W | 34-20 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 10.5 | 3 | W | 24-17 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-23-26 | Massachusetts | -12 | W | 35-16 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | W | 21-3 | UN | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Air Force |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Duquesne | -31.5 | W | 34-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 20-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | North Dakota State | 2 | L | 32-38 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 13-28 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Nevada | -4.5 | L | 36-33 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Navy | -2.5 | W | 14-9 | UN | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ No Illinois | -6.5 | W | 28-7 | UN | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | UNLV | 0 | W | 41-31 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | L | 13-17 | OV | 24 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Wyoming | -7 | L | 14-28 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 6-21 | OV | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas State | 23 | 47 | 24 | -3 | 19 | 25 | 4-1 / 0-2 | 3-2 / 0-2 | 3-2 / 1-1 | +19.6 / -8 | -17 / -3.5 |
| Colorado | 26 | -3 | 30(3) | | 27 | 22 | 1-2 / 1-3 | 1-2 / 1-3 | 2-1 / 1-2 | +2 / -19 | -3.5 / +8 |
Oh, for the good ‘ol days of opening week for Deion Sanders and his Buffs, when the national media was thinking the 14-13 win over Georgia Tech might mean something. It did mean something–the Yellow Jackets are way off this year, or they wouldn’t have done things like lose to Colorado, lose to Stanford and get boat-raced at home, no less, by Boston College last week. Since then, Coach Prime counts only one more win vs. Weber State and a Big XII losing streak that is now close to 13 months. All after last weekend’s latest humiliation vs. Oklahoma State when Deion didn’t exactly make proper adjustments at halftime before the Cowboys went on a 34-0 blitz in the final 30 minutes. The switch to ex-Utah Isaac Wilson at QB a few weeks ago has provided a bit of a lift for the offense that had stalled when early-season starter Julian Lewis wasn’t able to throw the ball more than a few yards downfield, but there’s a new problem–Wilson is an interception machine, guilty of seven picks across the past three games to negate some of the better passing numbers than Lewis. Since Colorado isn’t running the ball particularly well, either (ranks 110th at only 128 yards per game), the Buffs are a bit hard to trust. The same, however, might be said about K-State, with first-year head coach Collin Klein still apparently in adjustment phase to the role at his alma mater and the ‘Cats finding the Big XII a lot tougher than a favorable pre-league slate played in Manhattan. It’s only one win and cover in four tries in loop play as K-State has now had to readjust its aim to the Rate Bowl in Phoenix following last week’s depressing 28-17 loss at Arizona State when the Sun Devils would put the game away in the fourth quarter when using their third-string QB (freshman Jake Fette). Aside from K-State looking sartorially splendid in new purple pants and helmets, it was the second loss in as many tries on the conference trail and a fourth spread setback in the last five, but worse news is that is that the ‘Cats were minus catalyst senior QB Avery Johnson (neck/shoulder) in Tempe, with long-serving understudy Jacob Knuth getting the first meaningful snaps of his career, mostly staying in dump-off mode as the offense sputtered. (Note: Johnson has been declared out and Knuth is dealing with an ankle knock suffered last week, so there's a chance that soph DIllon Duff, yet to throw a pass in his college career, could get the start.) As Johnson is the main reason to put any kind of upward arrow next to K-State’s name, his potential absence opens the door for Deion to perhaps break that long Big XII skid, and maybe one last win before likely riding off in the sunset over the Rockies, with memories of 2023-24 at least leaving the Boulder fan base with something from the Coach Prime era that looks to be in its last chapter.
Play Colorado
10/29 10:40 AM PDT — Quarterback Julian Lewis, who started the first four games of the season for the Buffs, suffered a medical emergency at the team facility on Wednesday and was transported to a nearby hospital. No specifics were noted though Lewis is reportedly recovering, and his availability for Saturday appears very unlikely (he's been listed as doubtful on the official injury report). Fortmer Utah transfer Isaac Wilson will be making his fourth consecutive start at QB for Colorado.
10/29 10:42 AM PDT — Kansas State was minus senior QB Avery Johnson (neck/shoulder) during last Saturday's 28-17 loss at Arizona State, with senior Jacob Knuth on in relief and producing modest stats (26-for-41 but only for 196 yards) in the process. Head coach Collin Klein has now announced that Johnson remains out and will miss another start on Saturday, though now backup Knuth remains iffy as he deals with his own ankle injury, so it is possible, if not likely, that soph QB DIllon Duff, yet to throw a college pass, will be in the lineup at Boulder. Better news is that NFL prospect TE Garrett Oakley (14 career TD catches) is expected to be available after missing the past two games.
| Kansas State | 22.7 / 29 | -6.3 | 19 | 22 | -2 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Colorado | 18.3 / 37.7 | -19.3 | 29 | 15 | +14 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Kansas State | 10-24 | @ Arizona S. | -1 | 51.5 | 17-28 | Colorado | 10-24 | @ Oklahoma . | +13 | 55.5 | 24-57 |
| | 10-17 | Kansas | -3 | 55 | 35-24 | | 10-17 | Utah | +15 | 49.5 | 24-27 |
| | 10-10 | Houston U | -2.5 | 55 | 16-35 | | 10-03 | Texas Tech | +13.5 | 50.5 | 7-29 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Colorado | 14 | 50 | 18 | 47/151 | 14/25/1/172 | 0/0 |
| Kansas State | 24 | -17 | 16 | 43/206 | 10/17/0/115 | 0/0 |
| Kansas State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:1-4-1 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Nicholls State | -41.5 | W | 71-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 22-0 | OV | | | W | 36-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Washington State | -17.5 | W | 34-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10 | -10 | PK | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tulane | -20.5 | L | 31-20 | OV | 50 | -5.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Cincinnati U | -6 | L | 26-31 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Houston U | -2.5 | L | 16-35 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-21 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Kansas | -3 | W | 35-24 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 13.5 | -1.5 | L | 18-17 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona State | -1 | L | 17-28 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 10-14 | UN | 26 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Colorado |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-3-1 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:1-5-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Georgia Tech | 6.5 | W | 14-13 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Weber State | -38.5 | L | 52-21 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 21-7 | OV | | | W | 42-14 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Northwestern | 3.5 | L | 7-41 | P | 48 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-21 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Baylor | 8 | L | 13-23 | UN | 54.5 | 2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 6 | L | 3-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Texas Tech | 13.5 | L | 7-29 | UN | 50.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Utah | 15 | W | 24-27 | OV | 49.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 9.5 | L | 0-13 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Oklahoma State | 13 | L | 24-57 | OV | 55.5 | 3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | W | 24-23 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Mexico | 31 | -15.5 | 25.5 | -16.5 | 28 | 30 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 1-2 | +38.3 / +9 | -20.5 / -1.5 |
| San Jose State | 10 | 44 | 43(1) | | 43 | 41 | 1-2 / 3-2 | 0-3 / 4-1 | 0-3 / 1-4 | -3 / -1.6 | -7 / +8 |
The vision of New Mexico crashing the 12-team playoff hadn’t crossed our mind (or anyone else’s, we assume) until a few weeks ago, but this 2026 season is a bit different. After all, if UCLA and Kentucky can both be in the top ten past midseason in a sport other than basketball, why can’t the Lobos join the party? We’re still waiting for the pollsters to acknowledge the most fun in Albuquerque aside from the aerial tramway up Sandia Peak, but New Mexico, in its unorthodox manner, keeps reminding us it's for real, with a fire-drill offense and brawling defense and a coach (Jason Eck) who looks like he was pulled from a truck stop along I-40. Make no mistake, however, Eck knows what the heck he’s doing, and the worry in Lobo-land is that just in case their team can make the playoff, Eck could be lured away before New Mexico has a chance vs. one of the big boys as he will surely be one of the hottest names on the coaching carousel. As long as Eck is still in Albuquerque, however, we see no reason to buck the rampaging Lobos, who much earlier rendered a preseason injury to QB Jack Layne as a non-event as Eck continues to get serviceable work from dual-threat soph Toa Fa’avae and, on occasion, Oregon transfer Luke Moga. Though it’s Eck’s wildman stop unit that not only leads the nation in takeaways with 23 but also in scoring defense at a mere 11.3 points per game that is stifling all of the opposition. That should cause all sorts of problems for Ken Niumatalolo’s meandering Spartans, who to no avail cycled thru three different QBs in last week’s limp effort at Reno and now likely go back to early-season starter Luke Weaver, who at least got the offense out of a lurch in the late going after freshman Daniel Rolovich and Robert McDaniel were each stifled (and pulled). Moreover, the fact the San Jose’ offensive front couldn’t protect any of its QBs from the Wolf Pack pass rushers, who netted four sacks and countless pressures, hardly bodes well vs. one of the nation’s most aggressive platoons (UNM also ranks 15th in QB sacks with 20). At 14-5 against the number since Eck took over last season, and a win margin of better than 25 points per game this term, we’re well beyond the days where we'd never dream about laying two TDs on the road with the Lobos.
Play New Mexico
| New Mexico | 34.3 / 11 | +23.3 | 27 | 39 | -14 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| San Jose State | 16.7 / 18.3 | -1.7 | 42 | 45 | -1.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| New Mexico | 10-24 | North Dak. | -4.5 | 39 | 21-16 | San Jose State | 10-24 | @ Nevada | +6 | 46 | 13-28 |
| | 10-17 | @ Hawaii | -14.5 | 46.5 | 21-10 | | 10-17 | @ UTEP | -6.5 | 46.5 | 24-11 |
| | 10-03 | UTEP | -23.5 | 47.5 | 61-7 | | 10-09 | Wyoming | -4 | 42.5 | 13-16 |
|
| 10-03-25 | New Mexico | 28 | 58.5 | 29 | 27/76 | 28/40/3/344 | 0/0 |
| San Jose State | 35 | -1.5 | 24 | 34/157 | 26/30/0/334 | 0/0 |
| New Mexico |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:0-6-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Central Michigan | -11 | W | 38-7 | UN | 47.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Mercyhurst | -42.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 54.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Oklahoma | 21.5 | W | 6-14 | UN | 45.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 12.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | @ New Mexico State | -11.5 | W | 42-18 | OV | 47.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -7 | W | 14-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | UTEP | -23.5 | W | 61-7 | OV | 47.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -14 | W | 21-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Hawaii | -14.5 | L | 21-10 | UN | 46.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | North Dakota State | -4.5 | W | 21-16 | UN | 39 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 7.5 | -3 | W | 14-3 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Jose State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:1-7-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:0-7-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:0-7-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ USC | 37 | W | 26-42 | OV | 61 | 10 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14 | 23.5 | L | 0-28 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 1 | W | 27-21 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 0 | W | 10-7 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Cal Poly | -21.5 | L | 30-20 | UN | 58.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 13-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Fresno State | 4 | L | 10-26 | UN | 47.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | PK | 3-6 | UN | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Hawaii | 2.5 | W | 20-16 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | W | 14-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-09-26 | Wyoming | -4 | L | 13-16 | UN | 42.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -3 | L | 7-6 | UN | 21 |
| 10-17-26 | @ UTEP | -6.5 | W | 24-11 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Nevada | 6 | L | 13-28 | UN | 46 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Northwestern | 27 | 47.5 | 18 | | 20 | 28 | 5-0 / 1-1 | 4-1 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 1-1 | +26 / -1.5 | -13 / +7 |
| Oregon | 20 | -3.5 | 11(3) | -10 | 7 | 24 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 2-1 | +23 / -1.7 | -25 / -12.5 |
Some might suggest that the KO suffered by QB Dante Moore at USC on September 26, keeping him out of the lineup for the past month and likely the rest of the season, is the major reason for Oregon’s dramatic offensive downturn this season. Yet Ducks head coach Dan Lanning’s actions since suggest that the real issue was more likely not properly replacing recent OC Will Stein, now working miracles at Kentucky. The job proved too big for successor Drew Mehringer, promoted from the staff but pink-slipped by Lanning after the latest Webfoot disappointment last week at Illinois, the third-straight game Oregon has scored 17 or fewer points. The offense shouldn’t have been struggling like it has under backup pilot Dylan Raiola, who started the past two years at Nebraska and for a few days in January looked like he would be the No. 1 QB in Eugene before Moore boomeranged back to Autzen Stadium. Yet neither Raiola nor Brock Thomas (who started the Oct. 17 game vs. Raiola’s old Cornhuskers) has been able to detonate an attack whose issues might be more structural and play-calling...issues not likely solved in one week by Lanning’s demotion of Mehringer. (Offensive analyst and QB coach Jay Johnson will take over play-calling duties moving forward.) When he had the chance, perhaps Lanning would have been better served by dialing up former Ducks head coach Chip Kelly, who instead resurfaced at Northwestern as David Braun’s offensive coordinator and play-caller and suddenly putting a spark into the Wildcats, who have cracked the 40-point barrier three times while unlocking transfer QB Aidan Chiles, a candidate for nation’s most-improved player and already on 12 TD passes with just one pick after pedestrian numbers at Michigan State the past two seasons. Kelly’s offenses can usually run the ball, too, and the Wildcat strike force is doing much the same with a collection of north-south bangers led by holdovers Caleb Komolafe and Joseph Himon II, plus Florida State transfer Gavin Sawchuk, collectively gaining 5.2 yards per carry for an infantry gaining better than 200 yards per game. Mostly, however, this looks a case of "reputation vs. reality" and the marketplace being slow to react, as the Cats (6-1 SU and vs. the spread) have provided much better value and win the eye test vs. this disjointed Oregon version that will need a lot more than better QB play to prove that what we’ve been looking at the past eight weeks isn’t a mirage. By the way, can we start talking about the Cats as a stealth playoff candidate?
Play Northwestern
10/27 11:01 AM PDT — After Ducks QB Dante Moore missed a third-straight game last Saturday at Illinois due to concussion protocols, HC Dan Lanning has said it is unlikely that Moore will be allowed to return to active duty this season. . In his Monday press conference, Lanning was not optimistic that Moore would be able to return during the regular season.
| Northwestern | 37 / 16.3 | +20.7 | 18 | 34 | -19 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Oregon | 14 / 17.3 | -3.3 | 8 | 18 | -9 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Northwestern | 10-24 | Rutgers | -15 | 58.5 | 42-14 | Oregon | 10-24 | @ Illinois | -10.5 | 49 | 10-21 |
| | 10-17 | @ Michigan . | -7 | 50 | 24-21 | | 10-17 | Nebraska | -6 | 51 | 17-14 |
| | 10-10 | Ball State | -34.5 | 53.5 | 45-14 | | 10-10 | UCLA | -10 | 58 | 15-17 |
|
| 09-13-25 | Oregon | 34 | -24.5 | 21 | 30/176 | 19/26/1/197 | 0/0 |
| Northwestern | 14 | 50 | 15 | 37/178 | 11/22/2/135 | 1/0 |
| Northwestern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-2-2 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | South Dakota St | -14 | W | 34-18 | OV | 49.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 10-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Colorado | -3.5 | W | 41-7 | P | 48 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 21-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Indiana | 20.5 | W | 23-29 | OV | 49.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-2 | UN | 10.5 | 11.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Penn State | 3 | W | 34-13 | P | 47 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 23 |
| 10-10-26 | Ball State | -34.5 | L | 45-14 | OV | 53.5 | -9.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 31-14 | OV | 30 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan State | -7 | L | 24-21 | UN | 50 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | L | 10-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Rutgers | -15 | W | 42-14 | UN | 58.5 | -4.5 | W | 21-3 | OV | 13.5 | -9.5 | W | 28-6 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oregon |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:0-6-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Boise State | -25.5 | L | 34-27 | OV | 53 | -7 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -14.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Oklahoma State | -24 | L | 31-39 | OV | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | L | 17-24 | OV | 30 |
| 09-18-26 | Portland St | -58.5 | W | 84-0 | OV | 71.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 49-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ USC | -3.5 | W | 41-27 | OV | 60.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-10-26 | UCLA | -10 | L | 15-17 | UN | 58 | -3.5 | L | 6-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6.5 | L | 6-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Nebraska | -6 | L | 17-14 | UN | 51 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 26 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Illinois | -10.5 | L | 10-21 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nevada | 14 | 43 | 40 | | 40 | 42 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 1-2 | +8.5 / -1.3 | +1 / +0.5 |
| UCLA | 32 | -22.5 | 18(2) | -24 | 20 | 26 | 4-0 / 3-0 | 4-0 / 3-0 | 1-3 / 2-1 | +15 / +24.7 | -11 / +1.5 |
Aside from a couple of stray and very brief appearances in the top ten during the Jim Mora era a decade-plus ago, UCLA hasn’t enjoyed this sort of rarified air in the rankings in a generation, or since the long-ago Bob Toledo regime, when the Bruins spent more than a month in the top ten before fading in 2001. Along with this new-found respect, however, comes expectation in Westwood, and forced to carry heavy, 3-TD-plus imposts against Mountain West sides like Nevada (indeed, UCLA hasn't had to lay a number above 22 since a 2017 romp past Hawaii). While Bob Chesney will undoubtedly warn his undefeated team about this potential flat spot in front of the November Big Ten stretch drive, that might be a big ask even for a team that has been avoiding defeat (both outright and vs. the spread) into Halloween. Though more than a few Big Ten observers think Chensey’s team might actually be better off with a game-manager at QB like Cal Poly transfer Ty Dieffenbach with OC Dean Kennedy carefully keeping Dieffenbach playing within himself and not mimicking the free-wheeling style of the now-injured Nico Iamaleava, whose big-play capabilities could be compromised by big-play mistakes. Yet with Dieffenbach at the helm (counting the Oregon game, in which he went in the second half), UCLA is scoring under 21 points per game and content to grind out wins with its Wayne Knight-led ground assault and voracious defense that’s forced a whopping 22 turnovers (behind only New Mexico nationally). Like Rocky Balboa in the first Rocky, Nevada would be happy just to last the full 15 rounds and not humiliate itself, and recent efforts (four-straight covers) and some honorable showings vs. Power 4 heavyweights in recent years suggests the Pack might be able to avoid a blowout thanks in part to its very serviceable infantry led by RBs Dominic Kelley and Herschel Turner (combined over 1,000 rushing yards). There’s also the intriguing possibility of ex-Bruin Luke Duncan, who started a game for UCLA last fall at Ohio State and arguably looked better out of the bullpen last week vs, San Jose State, when passing for two TDs, than the injured pair ahead of him (Carter Jones and AJ Bianco) on the Reno depth chart, keeping this scoreline from getting out of hand. Mountain West observers don't expect the Pack to get hurt if Duncan has to give it another go on Saturday vs. his old team in Pasadena.
Play Nevada
10/27 4:09 AM PDT — Nevada was down to third-string QB and UCLA transfer Luke Duncan last week vs. San Jose State. There was little drop-off from the two injured QBs (Carter Jones and AJ Bianco; status still iffy for each this week) ahead of him on the depth chart.
| Nevada | 25 / 19 | +6 | 41 | 40 | -0.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| UCLA | 20.7 / 10.7 | +10 | 20 | 17 | -2.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Nevada | 10-24 | San Jose . | -6 | 46 | 28-13 | UCLA | 10-24 | Michigan . | -16.5 | 44 | 28-10 |
| | 10-17 | @ North Dak. | +15 | 42.5 | 17-31 | | 10-17 | Wisconsin | -1 | 43 | 17-7 |
| | 10-10 | @ UTEP | -10 | 48.5 | 30-13 | | 10-10 | @ Oregon | +10 | 58 | 17-15 |
| Nevada |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Kentucky | 0 | W | 49-14 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 21-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Montana State | 4.5 | L | 7-20 | UN | 51.5 | | L | 0-10 | OV | | | L | 0-17 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | -3.5 | L | 20-27 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Air Force | 4.5 | W | 33-36 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ UTEP | -10 | W | 30-13 | UN | 48.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 13-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ North Dakota State | 15 | W | 17-31 | OV | 42.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 7.5 | L | 11-19 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | San Jose State | -6 | W | 28-13 | UN | 46 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UCLA |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-0 , PSR:7-0 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:6-0 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ California | -2.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 24-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | San Diego State | -13.5 | W | 28-10 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Purdue | -13.5 | W | 52-38 | OV | 53 | -4.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | W | 54-3 | OV | 55.5 | 0 | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon | 10 | W | 17-15 | UN | 58 | 3.5 | W | 3-6 | UN | 13.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-6 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Wisconsin | -1 | W | 17-7 | UN | 43 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0 | W | 10-0 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | Michigan State | -16.5 | W | 28-10 | UN | 44 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tech Play | | Updated: 10/27 11:11 pm |
| Oregon State | 38 | -6 | 28.5 | | 31 | 38 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 3-0 | 4-0 / 2-1 | +23.5 / +14.3 | -6.5 / +1 |
| Fresno State | 27 | 57 | 27.5(2) | -3 | 28 | 41 | 2-1 / 2-2 | 3-0 / 2-2 | 3-0 / 1-3 | +17.7 / -1.5 | -7 / +3.5 |
Suddenly there are some unexpected new believers in the Beavers. Such as former coach and now-analyst Rick Neuheisel, who on a CBS Sports Network roundtable last week pegged Oregon State as the 12th team in his playoff projection. Not as far-fetched as it might seem, as James Madison’s loss last week eliminated the last unbeaten from the Group of 6 ranks, and the Beavers will have a chance to take care of Boise State in an upcoming "new Pac-12" showdown in two weeks. With combative early-season losses to Big XII contenders Houston and Texas Tech aging very well, OSU is at least going to make it to the playoff conversation if it keeps winning. For those who played the October 24 game vs. Washington State before a late spread move to -18.5, the Beavers have covered all seven of their games this season, with the win margin better than 32 points per game in their current five-game win streak. We do wonder a bit about last week’s announcement by all-world freshman WR Jesse Legree (who leads the nation’s receivers, including Ohio State’s Heisman hopeful Jeremiah Smith, with 14 TD catches) that he has already signed up for another year in Corvallis, though we have to wonder if there might be provisions in the deal for gunslinger Mercer transfer QB Braden Atkinson and HC JaMarcus Shephard to still be around next season at Reser Stadium, or the deal is off. Whatever, with both the nation’s receiving yardage leader (Legree at 1,040 yards - that’s 22.6 yards per catch) and passing leader (Atkinson 2,604 yards), it’s a trip to the fun zone every week to watch the explosive Beavs. Fresno’s more-conventional bent works best vs. middle-of-the-rung foes, where Matt Entz’s emphasis on defense and ball control has a better chance to ferment. Yet recent losses to Boise and San Diego State have seen the Bulldogs fall short, and despite his progress, Bulldog QB jayden Mandal (only 8 TD passes) will be hard-pressed to keep pace with the rapid-fire Atkinson.
Play Oregon State
| Oregon State | 56.7 / 23.3 | +33.3 | 30 | 37 | -13.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Fresno State | 26.7 / 23.3 | +3.3 | 28 | 32 | +1.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Oregon State | 10-17 | Washingto. | -19 | 52 | 48-30 | Fresno State | 10-17 | @ San Diego. | -6.5 | 46.5 | 23-26 |
| | 10-10 | San Diego. | -14.5 | 52.5 | 66-14 | | 10-10 | Boise Sta. | +9 | 48.5 | 31-38 |
| | 10-03 | @ Colorado . | -7 | 61 | 56-26 | | 10-03 | @ Washingto. | +2 | 45 | 26-6 |
|
| 09-06-25 | Fresno State | 36 | -1.5 | 15 | 27/199 | 13/18/1/121 | 0/0 |
| Oregon State | 27 | 45.5 | 30 | 33/156 | 32/49/2/388 | 0/0 |
| Oregon State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:6-0 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:6-0 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Houston U | 21 | W | 20-33 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-9 | OV | 10.5 | 12.5 | W | 7-19 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Texas Tech | 26 | W | 24-35 | OV | 52.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 14.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Montana | -17.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ UTEP | -11 | W | 33-7 | UN | 56 | -2.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -6.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Colorado State | -7 | W | 56-26 | OV | 61 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -4 | W | 35-14 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-10-26 | San Diego State | -14.5 | W | 66-14 | OV | 52.5 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -8.5 | W | 38-7 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Washington State | -19 | L | 48-30 | OV | 52 | -6.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -10.5 | W | 27-10 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Fresno State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:1-5-1 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-4-1 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ USC | 22.5 | L | 0-39 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | PK | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-30 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Sacramento State | -17.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -10.5 | W | 32-0 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Jose State | -4 | W | 26-10 | UN | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | PK | 6-3 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | Rice | -12 | W | 38-24 | OV | 43 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Washington State | 2 | W | 26-6 | UN | 45 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 6-6 | UN | 22.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Boise State | 9 | W | 31-38 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 13-15 | OV | 9.5 | 4.5 | L | 20-25 | OV | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ San Diego State | -6.5 | L | 23-26 | OV | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-16 | OV | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ohio State | 27 | -6 | 9 | -1.5 | 6 | 6 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 3-0 | 4-0 / 0-3 | +40.3 / +6.7 | -40 / -5 |
| USC | 16 | 50.5 | 12.5(2) | | 12 | 20 | 4-1 / 2-1 | 1-4 / 1-2 | 3-2 / 1-2 | +12.8 / -0.7 | -18.5 / -7.5 |
We can understand a few longtime Ohio State backers being a bit nervous about playing USC at the venerable LA Coliseum, where the last two visits (1963 and 2008) have resulted in thumping 32-3 and 35-3 wins, respectively, for the Trojans. (We know...we were at both games, and saw Paul Warfield get knocked out of that ‘63 meeting–our first-ever game attended!). There’s another reason...QB Julian Sayin is out, and Ryan Day’s choice between untested (save for a handful of snaps this season) true freshman Luke Fahey, or sophomore Tavien St. Clair, was still unclear after last weekend’s bye. Fahey got the call from the bullpen against Indiana on October 17 after Sayin went down, and had a bit of a deer-in-the-headlights look, but the hope in Columbus is that two weeks of prep between games will get one, or both, more up to speed--stay tuned. Day, however, must have been encouraged at his chances after watching Wisconsin bully USC last Saturday and pushing head coach Lincoln Riley closer to the abyss, with his status now topic number one on LA sports-talk radio after the Dodgers were swept out by the Brewers two weeks ago. Though no John Brockington or Archie Griffin in the current OSU backfield, most power-oriented offenses have exploited the Trojan defenses no matter who the coordinator under Riley. Meanwhile, as has often been the case for Riley against foes he can’t bully, the USC ground game went nowhere at Camp Randall (we'll say--minus 17 yards rushing!), and QB Jayden Maiava’s career-long penchant for mistakes in big games resurfaced when tossing a pair of picks in Madison and being generally overwhelmed by Luke Fickell’s pass rush. Against an even more-decorated Buckeyes defense, ranking 6th overall and tied for 4th in scoring at just 13.4 points per game, we can envision USC being made one, or even no-dimensional once again and Maiava’s capacity for meltdowns vs. quality defenses proving one more straw on the camel’s weakening back for Riley’s continuing job prospects in LA.
Play the Under
10/27 4:16 AM PDT — Ohio State QB Julian Sayin has been ruled out for the remainder of the regular season due to an arm injury suffered at Indiana on October 17. Head coach Ryan Day is still to decide for this week between true freshman Luke Fahey (who got the call from the bullpen against the Hooisers) and sophomore Tavien St. Clair. Both were decorated high school recruits, though several Big Ten observers wouldn't be surprised if Day uses some combination of both on Saturday.
| Ohio State | 31.7 / 15 | +16.7 | 3 | 16 | -16 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| USC | 21 / 22.7 | -1.7 | 13 | 18 | -3 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Ohio State | 10-17 | @ Indiana | -2.5 | 49.5 | 19-15 | USC | 10-24 | @ Wisconsin | -2 | 50.5 | 7-24 |
| | 10-10 | Maryland | -31 | 56.5 | 45-16 | | 10-10 | @ Penn State | PK | 54.5 | 31-23 |
| | 10-03 | @ Iowa | -14.5 | 46.5 | 31-14 | | 10-03 | Washingto. | -7 | 57 | 25-21 |
| Ohio State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:7-0 , PSR:7-0 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1H SUR:7-0 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Ball State | -50 | W | 56-3 | OV | 55.5 | -13.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -28.5 | L | 28-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas | 2 | W | 23-24 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kent State | -52 | W | 59-3 | OV | 58.5 | -13.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14.5 | -31.5 | W | 35-0 | UN | 35.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Illinois | -26 | L | 42-19 | OV | 53.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | W | 28-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa | -14.5 | W | 31-14 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-6 | OV | 7.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Maryland | -31 | L | 45-16 | OV | 56.5 | -7.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -18.5 | W | 31-10 | OV | 31 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Indiana | -2.5 | W | 19-15 | UN | 49.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| USC |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:0-6-1 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | San Jose State | -37 | L | 42-26 | OV | 61 | -10 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14 | -23.5 | W | 28-0 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | Fresno State | -22.5 | W | 39-0 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | PK | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 30-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Louisiana | -30.5 | L | 49-30 | OV | 59 | -7.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rutgers | -21 | L | 42-35 | OV | 58.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | L | 20-14 | OV | 31 |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon | 3.5 | L | 27-41 | OV | 60.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-13 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Washington U | -7 | L | 25-21 | UN | 57 | -2.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | -4 | L | 10-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Penn State | 0 | W | 31-23 | UN | 54.5 | 0 | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | 17-17 | OV | 27 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Wisconsin | -2 | L | 7-24 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Auburn | 20 | 58.5 | 19.5 | | 18 | 10 | 2-2 / 1-1 | 1-3 / 1-1 | 2-2 / 1-1 | +3.8 / -3.5 | -8 / +12.5 |
| Mississippi | 27 | -10.5 | 7.5(3) | -15 | 8 | 8 | 3-0 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 0-3 / 3-0 | +22.7 / +1.3 | -15 / -1 |
These SEC foes have not met since Ole Miss earned a 28-21 road win at Auburn in 2023. Both teams are licking their wounds after suffering tough defeats last week. We were on Ole Miss as a road 'dog at Texas, and depending on what color glasses you're wearing, that result could be viewed in a number of ways. Trinidad Chambliss had arguably his worst game of the season, completing 48.1-percent of his passes with three interceptions against the Longhorns. The Rebels trailed 24-3 at halftime, and yet, probably should have earned a push on the point spread. Down 10 and driving with momentum, Ole Miss head coach Pete Golding made the curious decision to kick a quick field goal to cut the gap to seven instead of punching in a likely touchdown. The plan nearly worked as Ole Miss recovered the onside kick, but couldn't find the end zone on the ensuing possession. You can't help but wonder if things would have been different if the Rebels went for the TD first after driving 53 yards in 63 seconds. Ole Miss running back Kewan Lacy has been battling arm injuries over the last month, and he suffered a dislocated shoulder in last week's loss to Texas. Lacy will not play in this week's contest against the Tigers. Auburn hits the road after falling at home to LSU last week. The Bayou Bengals led 31-10 at halftime and put things on cruise control after that. Auburn emptied the playbook in the prior week's win over Georgia and the Tigers didn't have much left in the tank for LSU last week. Our numbers are in line with where this game has opened, but we have some mild interest in Auburn. Ole Miss has a date with Georgia on deck, so the Rebels may try and squeak past this one while saving something in the bank for next week. Over the last three games against Tennessee, Georgia and LSU, Auburn QB Byrum Brown has averaged 21.3 rushing attempts per game. The Tigers want to keep the ball on the ground, limit mistakes, play good defense and see what happens. On October 3, Auburn closed as a six-point road 'dog at Tennessee. Now, the Tigers are getting nearly two touchdowns at Ole Miss while the Rebels are missing their star running back?
Play Auburn
10/26 2:08 PM PDT — Ole Miss running back Kewan Lacy has been battling arm injuries over the last month, and he suffered a dislocated shoulder in last week's loss to Texas. Lacy will not play in this week's contest against the Tigers.
| Auburn | 19.3 / 28.7 | -9.3 | 17 | 8 | +10.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Mississippi | 36.7 / 18 | +18.7 | 8 | 13 | -3.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Auburn | 10-24 | LSU | +7 | 52 | 17-38 | Mississippi | 10-24 | @ Texas | +3 | 55 | 27-34 |
| | 10-17 | @ Georgia | +19 | 50 | 27-24 | | 10-17 | Missouri | -4 | 57 | 31-3 |
| | 10-03 | @ Tennessee. | +6 | 54 | 14-24 | | 10-10 | @ Vanderbilt | -9.5 | 55 | 52-17 |
| Auburn |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Baylor | -6.5 | L | 17-16 | UN | 58.5 | -1.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | So Mississippi | -32 | W | 43-8 | UN | 56.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 27-8 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida | 2.5 | L | 39-44 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Vanderbilt | -10 | L | 21-15 | UN | 54.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Tennessee U | 6 | L | 14-24 | UN | 54 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Georgia | 19 | W | 27-24 | OV | 50 | 4.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-24-26 | LSU | 7 | L | 17-38 | OV | 52 | 1.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | 4 | L | 10-31 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Samford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Louisville | -6.5 | L | 41-38 | OV | 54.5 | -3 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | -4 | PK | 10-6 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Charlotte | -44 | L | 41-9 | UN | 59.5 | -13.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14.5 | -27.5 | L | 27-0 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | LSU | 3 | W | 32-24 | UN | 59 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | 1.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Florida | 4 | L | 28-52 | OV | 59 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Vanderbilt | -9.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 55 | -3.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -5.5 | W | 42-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Missouri | -4 | W | 31-3 | UN | 57 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | W | 21-3 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas | 3 | L | 27-34 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | L | 3-24 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wofford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mississippi St | 13 | 50.5 | 23 | | 18 | 15 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 1-2 | +3.8 / +0.3 | -6 / +6.5 |
| Texas | 31 | -19.5 | 8(3) | -18 | 6 | 8 | 4-1 / 1-0 | 2-3 / 0-1 | 2-3 / 0-1 | +16.2 / +3 | -15.5 / -5 |
Texas has won each of the last two meetings, but Mississippi State covered the number as a 'dog in both. The Bulldogs pushed the Longhorns to overtime in Starkville last season before falling in the extra frame. Mississippi State out-gained Texas in that contest. The Longhorns snapped their two-game losing skid with a nail-biter win over Ole Miss last week. The Longhorns nearly blew a 24-3 halftime lead as the Rebels had a chance to tie (or potentially win) in the final minute. Texas is battling some injury concerns at key positions. Wide receiver Cam Coleman and running back Hollywood Smothers were both limited participants in practice on Tuesday. Coleman was unable to finish last week's win over Ole Miss as he battled a shoulder injury. After a splashy start to the year, Coleman has been held to a total of four catches and 30 receiving yards over the Longhorns' last two games. Star defensive end Colin Simmons did not play last week against the Rebels as he deals with an ankle injury. Unfortunately for the Bulldogs, the outlook doesn't look as positive as it did ahead of this matchup last season. Mississippi State QB Kamario Taylor tried to give it a go last week against Oklahoma, but couldn't overcome the toe issue that has slowed him down over the last few weeks. Taylor only played 12 snaps against the Sooners after missing the previous game against LSU, and on Tuesday, the Bulldogs announced that they were shutting him down for the rest of the season. Freshman Parker Puckett and veteran QB AJ Swann will compete for the starting job in practice this week. If you've seen either play, then you know that's probably not a great sign for the Bulldogs at the moment. Texas had a fairly early bye and the Longhorns have back-to-back road games on the horizon, so if there's an opportunity to catch their breath and slow things down in the second half, Steve Sarkisian will probably take it.
Play the Under
10/27 12:08 PM PDT — Mississippi State QB Kamario Taylor will miss the rest of the season with a toe/foot injury. Freshman Parker Puckett and veteran QB AJ Swann will compete for the starting job in practice this week.
10/27 12:53 PM PDT — Wide receiver Cam Coleman and running back Hollywood Smothers were both limited participants in practice on Tuesday. Coleman was unable to finish last week's win over Ole Miss as he battled a shoulder injury. Star defensive end Colin Simmons did not play last week against the Rebels as he deals with an ankle injury.
| Mississippi St | 12.7 / 36.7 | -24 | 18 | 10 | +8.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Texas | 27.3 / 27 | +0.3 | 6 | 11 | -8 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Mississippi St | 10-24 | Oklahoma | +2 | 49 | 15-23 | Texas | 10-24 | Mississip. | -3 | 55 | 34-27 |
| | 10-17 | @ LSU | +17.5 | 56.5 | 0-31 | | 10-17 | Florida | -13 | 51.5 | 24-27 |
| | 10-03 | Alabama | +5.5 | 63 | 23-56 | | 10-10 | @ Oklahoma | -7.5 | 41 | 24-27 |
|
| 10-25-25 | Texas | 45 | -8 | 22 | 32/72 | 30/47/1/356 | 1/0 |
| Mississippi St | 38 | 49 | 25 | 43/63 | 27/43/0/382 | 2/1 |
| Mississippi St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UL Monroe | -28.5 | W | 62-13 | OV | 54.5 | -7.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 13.5 | -17 | W | 41-3 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Minnesota U | -1 | W | 38-13 | UN | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | W | 28-6 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ South Carolina | 3.5 | W | 41-34 | OV | 60 | 0.5 | L | 0-13 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 14-23 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri | -3.5 | W | 31-24 | UN | 58.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Alabama | 5.5 | L | 23-56 | OV | 63 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 17-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ LSU | 17.5 | L | 0-31 | UN | 56.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Oklahoma | 2 | L | 15-23 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 0 | L | 0-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Tennessee Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-4-1 | 1H SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-2-1 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Texas State | -29.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 61.5 | -7.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -17.5 | W | 28-7 | OV | 33 |
| 09-12-26 | Ohio State | -2 | L | 24-23 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tex San Antonio | -30 | L | 30-6 | UN | 58.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18 | L | 20-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tennessee U | -5 | L | 20-17 | UN | 54.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -3 | W | 10-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma | -7.5 | L | 24-27 | OV | 41 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -4 | W | 17-7 | OV | 20 |
| 10-17-26 | Florida | -13 | L | 24-27 | UN | 51.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | PK | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Mississippi | -3 | W | 34-27 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | W | 24-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Washington U | 28 | 49.5 | 18 | | 18 | 25 | 3-2 / 1-1 | 0-5 / 2-0 | 3-2 / 1-1 | +5.6 / +4 | -22 / +5 |
| Nebraska | 26 | -7.5 | 15(3) | -6 | 15 | 9 | 4-1 / 1-1 | 4-1 / 2-0 | 3-2 / 0-2 | +25.2 / +7.5 | -17.5 / +0.5 |
Internal dynamics of a team are sometimes hard to quantify...but sometimes, they’re not. Look no further than the Huskies, with reports from Seattle of a fractured clubhouse due to the presence of QB Demond Williams, whose dalliance with LSU in the portal after a renewed commitment to Washington, then a quick boomerang back to Seattle with a reported $4 million NIL deal in his pocket, apparently sat as badly with teammates almost as much as HC Jedd Fisch’s welcoming embrace of Williams back into the program. The Huskies would proceed to play with about as much emotion as post office employees during the first half of the season when they greatly underachieved and covered the spread just once (vs unreliable USC) in their first six games. All it took to change the context, apparently, was Williams getting KO’d with a shoulder injury late in the first half of an embarrassment at home vs. Iowa on October 9. It was too late to do anything about the result with the Hawkeyes already cruising, but the switch to backup QB Elijah Brown provided an immediate spark, which continued in the subsequent 38-26 win at Purdue when U-Dub was positively animated on the field for the first time this season. Likely a direct consequence, some sources are saying in the Northwest, to the team rallying behind Brown, who tossed three TD passes for the second-straight game and seemed in complete control of the offense which also generated a real infantry diversion (186 rushing yards, including long scoring runs by Trey Cooley and Brian Bonner Jr.) for the first time all season. Now, we’re just waiting for confirmation from Fisch that the move to Brown sticks after he and a now-healthy Williams split first-team reps during the subsequent bye week. Assuming Brown gets the nod, as expected, the Huskies suddenly seem to have a sharper edge, and can’t be sure about the mental state of the host Huskers after a pair of galling losses to Indiana and Oregon before last week’s bye, blowing late leads against both the Hoosiers and Ducks. Of bigger concern for Matt Rhule is a recent downturn in offensive production, scoring a mere 31 points across the pair of losses after tallying almost 44 points per game across the first five wins, with the big-play well suddenly running dry for livewire UNLV transfer QB Anthony Colandrea (just one TD pass across the past two games after a combined five in the romps past Michigan State and Maryland). Thus, we’ve got a conditional recommendation here on the Huskies as long as it’s Brown at QB; we would rather stay clear altogether if Fisch deems it necessary for all of Williams’ NIL money to mandate his place in the lineup. C’mon Jedd, do the right thing!
Play Washington
10/27 4:30 AM PDT — Huskies two-year starting QB Demond Williams, KO'd with a shoulder injury in the loss to Iowa on October 9 and out for the subsequent game at Purdue, returned to practice during the bye week. Though head coach Jedd Fisch has been reluctant to announce Williams' return to the starting lineup due to the superb form of backup Elijah Brown, a former Stanford transfer who tossed six TD passes in six quarters of relief and impressively led the 38-26 win at Purdue on October 16.
| Washington U | 27.7 / 30.7 | -3 | 20 | 19 | +2.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Nebraska | 26.3 / 20 | +6.3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Washington U | 10-16 | @ Purdue | +3 | 50.5 | 38-26 | Nebraska | 10-17 | @ Oregon | +6 | 51 | 14-17 |
| | 10-09 | Iowa | -3 | 41.5 | 24-41 | | 10-10 | Indiana | +9 | 48.5 | 17-20 |
| | 10-03 | @ USC | +7 | 57 | 21-25 | | 10-03 | Maryland | -14.5 | 52.5 | 48-23 |
| Washington U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Washington State | -24 | L | 24-10 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -14 | L | 10-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Utah State | -28 | L | 16-14 | UN | 55.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -17 | L | 10-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Eastern Washington | -42.5 | L | 48-16 | OV | 59 | | W | 14-3 | OV | | | W | 31-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Minnesota U | -12 | L | 24-27 | OV | 45 | -2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 23 |
| 10-03-26 | @ USC | 7 | W | 21-25 | UN | 57 | 2.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | 4 | W | 14-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-09-26 | Iowa | -3 | L | 24-41 | OV | 41.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-13 | OV | 7.5 | -1.5 | L | 3-27 | OV | 20 |
| 10-16-26 | @ Purdue | 3 | W | 38-26 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | 2.5 | W | 24-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nebraska |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1H SUR:7-0 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Ohio | -23.5 | W | 49-21 | OV | 47.5 | -7 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10 | -13.5 | L | 14-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Bowling Green | -31 | W | 56-7 | OV | 49 | -7 | W | 14-0 | OV | 11.5 | -17.5 | W | 35-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Dakota | -27.5 | L | 34-7 | UN | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 17-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Michigan State | -5.5 | W | 31-13 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | W | 24-10 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Maryland | -14.5 | W | 48-23 | OV | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-16 | OV | 12.5 | -8.5 | L | 28-23 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Indiana | 9 | W | 17-20 | UN | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | 5.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oregon | 6 | W | 14-17 | UN | 51 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 26 |
| 10-31-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UTEP | 7 | 44 | 49 | | 47 | 42 | 1-3 / 0-3 | 1-3 / 0-3 | 1-3 / 2-1 | -3.8 / -46.7 | +0.5 / +33 |
| North Dakota State | 38 | -23.5 | 31(2) | -20 | 29 | 27 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 1-3 | 1-3 / 1-3 | +26.5 / +4 | -20 / -6.5 |
We should be thankful, we suppose, that Gloria Narvaez is only the commissioner of a collection as harmless as the Mountain West. Should she instead have some important government position and have to appoint cabinet members, say, we could only pray her recruitment is better than the football schools she added to the Mountain West after the exodus of five members following last season. Surely, Narvaez could have fished somewhere other than the bottom of the barrel, where she found UTEP and Northern Illinois, with nary an FBS win between them as we hit Halloween, and both fittingly on a sickly 15.1 points per game (tied for 135th nationally in scoring), with FEMA reportedly on alert for their much-awaited season-ending clash on November 28. Until then, we watch each lose. Some veteran regional observers are wondering if Scotty Walden’s Miners might be the worst team they’ve ever seen in the Mountain West or the old WAC, and wondering how Walden (6-25 SU since taking over in 2024) might possibly survive into 2027. Since awakening from the dream that it actually led Michigan deep into the second quarter in Ann Arbor on September 19, UTEP has been outscored 193-41, and that doesn’t even include the 51-0 pasting absorbed at Oklahoma in the opener. After making loop also-rans like Nevada and San Jose State look like Alabama in recent weeks, we shudder to think the problems the Miners might have in Fargo, where North Dakota State has proven just as capable of bullying bad FBS sides as it did FCS also-rans in the Missouri Valley the past several years when competing for and often winning national honors. The current Bison aren’t far off of those powerhouses and are already bowl-eligible in their first spin around the FBS track, with a balanced offense behind QB Nathan Hayes that’s scored better than 30 points per game vs. FBS foes inside the Fargodome while out-scoring Jacksonville State, Wyoming and Nevada a combined 92-24. Moreover, a defense ranked second behind only Notre Dame in the FBS ought to have no trouble vs. the Miners’ non-offense whose running backs are gaining about 70 inches per carry, and the infantry reduced to scrambles by QBs Raymond Moore II and recently-hurting (concussion, hand) EJ Colson, Jr. Will UTEP want to even make this trip?
Play North Dakota State
10/27 12:05 PM PDT — NDSU quarterback Nathan Hayes is listed as questionable with an ankle injury. The Bison have a bye on the horizon, so there may be some incentive to get Hayes some rest with NDSU listed as a 24.5-point favorite in this matchup with the Miners.
| UTEP | 10.3 / 38.3 | -28 | 48 | 37 | +13.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| North Dakota State | 18 / 17 | +1 | 29 | 33 | -4.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| UTEP | 10-17 | San Jose . | +6.5 | 46.5 | 11-24 | North Dakota State | 10-24 | @ New Mexico | +4.5 | 39 | 16-21 |
| | 10-10 | Nevada | +10 | 48.5 | 13-30 | | 10-17 | Nevada | -15 | 42.5 | 31-17 |
| | 10-03 | @ New Mexico | +23.5 | 47.5 | 7-61 | | 10-10 | @ UNLV | -3 | 48 | 7-13 |
| UTEP |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-6 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-6 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-5-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Oklahoma | 41 | L | 0-51 | UN | 51.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | OV | 12.5 | 24 | L | 0-27 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | Texas Southern | -26.5 | W | 51-10 | OV | 53 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Michigan | 34.5 | L | 17-52 | OV | 48.5 | 7.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 20 | W | 14-17 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon State | 11 | L | 7-33 | UN | 56 | 2.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ New Mexico | 23.5 | L | 7-61 | OV | 47.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 14 | L | 0-21 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Nevada | 10 | L | 13-30 | UN | 48.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-13 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | San Jose State | 6.5 | L | 11-24 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Dakota State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Jacksonville St | -6.5 | W | 33-7 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -3.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Fordham | -41.5 | L | 38-0 | UN | 54 | | W | 3-0 | OV | | | W | 17-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Air Force | -2 | W | 38-32 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 28-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Sacramento State | -24.5 | L | 31-10 | UN | 50.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 10.5 | -14.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Wyoming | -17 | W | 28-0 | UN | 44 | -4.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -10 | W | 17-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ UNLV | -3 | L | 7-13 | UN | 48 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Nevada | -15 | L | 31-17 | OV | 42.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7.5 | W | 19-11 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ New Mexico | 4.5 | L | 16-21 | UN | 39 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 7.5 | 3 | L | 3-14 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-31-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| So Mississippi | 34 | -3.5 | 47 | -3 | 48 | 35 | 2-2 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 3-1 / 1-2 | +3 / -19.7 | +0.5 / +20 |
| UL Monroe | 27 | 55 | 51(1) | | 50 | 38 | 0-3 / 1-3 | 0-3 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 2-2 | -18.3 / -16.3 | +5.5 / +16 |
The home team has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings in this Sun Belt matchup. Southern Miss earned a 49-21 home win last season before former head coach Charles Huff left for Memphis. Each of the last two meetings have flown over the total. Both teams broke lengthy losing streaks last week. Southern Miss earned its first win over an FBS-level opponent this season, beating Louisiana as an 11.5-point home 'dog. First-year head coach Blake Anderson got his team's best performance of the season, out-gaining the Ragin' Cajuns while holding the advantage in most statistical categories. The eye-popping one comes in the fourth down department where the Eagles said "go for it" a whopping seven times (went 4-for-7). There are five college football teams that don't have seven fourth down attempts during this entire season, let alone one game. UL-Monroe is also riding high after the WarHawks won at Troy as a 13.5-point road 'dog last week. Trailing 14-3 with under five minutes remaining in the game, Monroe scored three touchdowns (including a fumble return in the end zone) to steal the win. While we tip our cap to the WarHawks' defense, we need to see a little proof that there is a revival in Monroe before we can fully buy-in. This is still a team that allowed 62 points to Mississippi State, 38 points to FCS-level Southeast Louisiana, 45 points to Florida Atlantic and 52 points to South Alabama. Southern Miss' offense can score points in bunches, if given the opportunity. Recent series history between these teams doesn't hurt, either.
Play the Over
| So Mississippi | 27.3 / 36.3 | -9 | 48 | 37 | +9 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| UL Monroe | 18.7 / 30 | -11.3 | 52 | 39 | +13 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| So Mississippi | 10-24 | Louisiana | +11.5 | 52.5 | 35-31 | UL Monroe | 10-24 | @ Troy | +13 | 51.5 | 21-14 |
| | 10-17 | Arkansas . | +5.5 | 61 | 13-23 | | 10-17 | Louisiana. | +13.5 | 56 | 0-24 |
| | 10-06 | @ Troy | +9.5 | 51.5 | 34-55 | | 10-03 | @ South Ala. | +13 | 56.5 | 35-52 |
|
| 10-25-25 | UL Monroe | 21 | 49.5 | 22 | 40/209 | 12/26/2/103 | 1/1 |
| So Mississippi | 49 | -14 | 21 | 38/197 | 18/23/0/248 | 0/0 |
| So Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Alcorn State | -19.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Auburn | 32 | L | 8-43 | UN | 56.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 8-27 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Connecticut | 3.5 | L | 20-48 | OV | 54.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 12.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-27 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tulane | 18 | W | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 10 | W | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-06-26 | @ Troy | 9.5 | L | 34-55 | OV | 51.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas St | 5.5 | L | 13-23 | UN | 61 | 0.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-16 | UN | 31 |
| 10-24-26 | Louisiana | 11.5 | W | 35-31 | OV | 52.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | W | 21-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UL Monroe |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-6 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-5 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-2-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Mississippi St | 28.5 | L | 13-62 | OV | 54.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 13.5 | 17 | L | 3-41 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ UAB | 9 | W | 20-26 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13 | 6 | W | 17-10 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | SE Louisiana | -9.5 | L | 35-38 | OV | 48.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | L | 13-24 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Florida Atlantic | 12 | L | 17-45 | OV | 58 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | L | 17-35 | OV | 29 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Alabama | 13 | L | 35-52 | OV | 56.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | L | 14-31 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Louisiana Tech | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 56 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 29 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Troy | 13 | W | 21-14 | UN | 51.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | W | 3-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wisconsin | 19 | 36 | 19.5 | | 19 | 13 | 4-0 / 1-1 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 1-3 / 0-1 | +29 / -3 | -18.5 / +5.5 |
| Iowa | 20 | -2.5 | 16.5(3) | -6 | 17 | 21 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 1-3 / 1-2 | +20.3 / +5 | -17 / 0 |
Iowa has won-and-covered each of the last four meetings. Luke Fickell's hot seat has cooled off in recent weeks, but Iowa is a big reason why the seat was warm in the first place. The Hawkeyes have out-scored the Badgers by a combined margin of 118-26 during this run. Will that streak end this weekend? We're inclined to believe that it will. There may be a little bit of "letdown" sentiment in the betting market after Wisconsin beat USC last week, but if you ask the Badgers, that probably didn't feel like an upset. Yes, that win was big for Fickell and his job is probably safe with upcoming games against Rutgers, Maryland and Purdue on the horizon. But in terms of the players on the field, Wisconsin's roster handled USC with relative ease last week. The Badgers held the Trojans to 3.2 yards per play and sacked Jayden Maiava five times. We're not really getting the sense that there will be much of a letdown after that performance. Iowa returns home after a road loss at Minnesota. Kirk Ferentz will spin the QB roulette wheel one more time, reinserting Hank Brown back into the starting role after Jeremy Hecklinski served as the primary signal caller over the last two weeks. Brown and Hecklinski combined for three interceptions last week against the Gophers. Iowa has certainly enjoyed success in this matchup, but can you trust the Hawkeyes to win by margin? Iowa running back Kamari Moulton will miss the rest of the regular season as he recovers from a hand injury. Moulton was averaging 6.3 yards per carry with four touchdowns for the Hawkeyes. Iowa closed as a 3.5-point home favorite against Penn State last season and won by one. Iowa closed as a 17.5-point home favorite against Michigan State and won by three. Iowa closed as a 14.5-point favorite against Iowa State in Week 2 and won by three. Trusting the Hawkeyes to win by margin as a home favorite is a nerve-wracking proposition, especially with Iowa's current crop of quarterbacks.
Play Wisconsin
10/27 1:08 PM PDT — Iowa running back Kamari Moulton will miss the rest of the regular season as he recovers from a hand injury. Moulton was averaging 6.3 yards per carry with four touchdowns for the Hawkeyes.
| Wisconsin | 20.7 / 9 | +11.7 | 19 | 19 | -2 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Iowa | 21.7 / 22.7 | -1 | 17 | 14 | +3.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Wisconsin | 10-24 | USC | +2 | 50.5 | 24-7 | Iowa | 10-24 | @ Minnesota. | -7.5 | 41 | 10-13 |
| | 10-17 | @ UCLA | +1 | 43 | 7-17 | | 10-09 | @ Washingto. | +3 | 41.5 | 41-24 |
| | 10-03 | Michigan . | -8.5 | 43.5 | 31-3 | | 10-03 | Ohio State | +14.5 | 46.5 | 14-31 |
|
| 10-11-25 | Iowa | 37 | -5.5 | 18 | 36/210 | 18/25/1/109 | 0/0 |
| Wisconsin | 0 | 37.5 | 12 | 36/127 | 8/21/2/82 | 2/1 |
| 11-02-24 | Wisconsin | 10 | 40 | 16 | 28/124 | 15/29/2/137 | 0/0 |
| Iowa | 42 | -2.5 | 23 | 54/329 | 7/10/0/93 | 1/0 |
| Wisconsin |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-4-1 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Notre Dame | 21.5 | L | 13-41 | OV | 46 | 6.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Illinois | -43 | L | 36-9 | UN | 53 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 23-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Eastern Michigan | -23.5 | W | 54-10 | OV | 44 | -6.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Penn State | 9.5 | W | 24-20 | P | 44 | 2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 6 | L | 7-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan State | -8.5 | W | 31-3 | UN | 43.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -6 | W | 17-3 | UN | 22 |
| 10-17-26 | @ UCLA | 1 | L | 7-17 | UN | 43 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | 0 | L | 0-10 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | USC | 2 | W | 24-7 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | No Illinois | -31 | W | 40-0 | UN | 44.5 | -7.5 | W | 20-0 | OV | 10 | -18.5 | W | 33-0 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Iowa State | -14 | L | 16-13 | UN | 42.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Northern Iowa | -37.5 | W | 55-0 | OV | 48.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Michigan | 4.5 | W | 20-19 | UN | 40 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 7.5 | 2 | L | 7-10 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio State | 14.5 | L | 14-31 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-10 | OV | 7.5 | 7.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ Washington U | 3 | W | 41-24 | OV | 41.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-0 | OV | 7.5 | 1.5 | W | 27-3 | OV | 20 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Minnesota U | -7.5 | L | 10-13 | UN | 41 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -4.5 | L | 3-3 | UN | 20.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida Intl | 23 | 45.5 | 42 | | 41 | 47 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 1-1-1 | 2-2 / 1-2 | +11.5 / -6.3 | -15.5 / +7.5 |
| Liberty | 27 | -14 | 27(1) | -16 | 32 | 44 | 3-0 / 3-1 | 2-1 / 3-1 | 1-2 / 1-3 | +23 / +13.5 | -19 / -3 |
Third time's a charm? Each of the last two meetings in this Conference-USA matchup have gone to overtime. Liberty earned a 31-24 home win in overtime in October 2024, and the Panthers returned the favor with a 34-27 overtime win in Miami last season. We've been riding the Flames' train for quite a few stops this season, but we're looking to make a small detour on Saturday. Liberty has won-and-covered each of its last five games, but Florida International may be the best team the Flames have played since James Madison in the opener. Liberty has out-scored its first three conference opponents by a combined margin of 99-23, but Florida International's defense represents a step up in class compared to the teams that Liberty has been facing in recent weeks. Florida International has lost its last two games by a field goal in each contest. What would this point spread be if the Panthers had won one (or both) of those games? Holding Florida Atlantic to 16 points is a fantastic result considering the Owls have scored an average of 46.5 points per game in the four contests since then. FIU had extra time to prep for this game after playing at home last Tuesday. Liberty is the class of Conference-USA this season, but we can't justify a two-touchdown spread in favor of the Flames in this contest.
Play Florida International
| Florida Intl | 23 / 18.7 | +4.3 | 41 | 43 | -4.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Liberty | 33 / 7.7 | +25.3 | 33 | 44 | -9.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Florida Intl | 10-20 | Middle Te. | -10 | 46.5 | 23-26 | Liberty | 10-22 | @ Kennesaw . | -8 | 50 | 34-6 |
| | 10-13 | @ Jacksonvi. | +3 | 44 | 24-27 | | 10-08 | Sam Houst. | -13.5 | 52.5 | 35-3 |
| | 10-07 | New Mexic. | -7 | 47 | 22-3 | | 10-02 | @ Delaware | -7 | 51.5 | 30-14 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Liberty | 27 | -2.5 | 25 | 41/160 | 17/32/2/218 | 0/0 |
| Florida Intl | 34 | 51 | 22 | 39/169 | 24/34/0/206 | 0/0 |
| Florida Intl |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-1-1 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ South Florida | 14.5 | W | 9-19 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-6 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Buffalo U | -8 | W | 33-20 | OV | 47.5 | -3 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10 | -5.5 | W | 21-6 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | 5 | L | 10-16 | UN | 62.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | PK | 7-10 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Long Island | -37.5 | L | 20-3 | UN | 54 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-3 | OV | |
| 10-07-26 | New Mexico State | -7 | W | 22-3 | UN | 47 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4 | W | 10-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-13-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 3 | PK | 24-27 | OV | 44 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-20-26 | Middle Tenn St | -10 | L | 23-26 | OV | 46.5 | -2.5 | L | 8-7 | OV | 7.5 | -6.5 | L | 8-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Liberty |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ James Madison | 6 | L | 13-20 | UN | 51 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Gardner Webb | -28.5 | L | 24-23 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 14-6 | OV | | | L | 17-20 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Ball State | -14.5 | W | 51-15 | OV | 49.5 | -4.5 | W | 13-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 23-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-24-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | -2.5 | W | 34-17 | OV | 50 | -0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | L | 10-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-02-26 | @ Delaware | -7 | W | 30-14 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4 | W | 20-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-08-26 | Sam Houston St | -13.5 | W | 35-3 | UN | 52.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27 |
| 10-22-26 | @ Kennesaw State | -8 | W | 34-6 | UN | 50 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -5.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Colorado State | 36 | 59 | 47.5 | | 41 | 40 | 3-2 / 0-2 | 3-2 / 0-1-1 | 5-0 / 2-0 | +3 / -26.5 | +0.5 / +15 |
| Utah State | 33 | -9.5 | 38(3) | -12.5 | 40 | 32 | 2-1 / 0-4 | 1-2 / 3-1 | 0-3 / 1-3 | 0 / -14.3 | -7.5 / +22 |
Forgive us for finding a curious fascination with this matchup, perhaps because it’s one of the great immovable object (Utah State’s offense) vs. movable object (Colorado State’s defense) examples that we’ve ever encountered. Indeed, it’s rare to see a clash between the nation’s lowest-scoring team (Utah State at 14.9 points per game) and the nation’s bottom-ranked scoring defense (Rams 44 points per game). So, what gives? Well, as scorelines were often lower for CSU basketball in the days Boyd Grant was the hoops coach than what we’re seeing lately from Jim Mora’s no-defense crew, and only paratroopers, commodity brokers, and other assorted daredevils willing to take on the challenge of being Mora’s defensive coordinator after Tyson Summers was ousted during the Oregon State humiliation a few weeks ago, we suspect even the low-wattage Aggies might do some business. After all, CSU is allowing 56 points per game (56 ppg!!) in its four games the past month, though the offense is pouring gas on the fire (and scoreboard) by generating its own numbers like 56 points in last week’s shootout win over San Diego State, when Oklahoma State transfer QB Hauss Henjy finally returned to active duty for the first time in over a month and promptly accounted for more than 400 yards (333 passing, 85 rushing) and five TDs as even the normally-pedestrian Aztecs were goaded into a shootout. That, however, is something we have a hard time envisioning for Bronco Mendenhall’s Aggies, who unlike the Rams are apt to hang their hats on defense. To wit: last week Utah State allowed only 250 yards to the same Texas State side that napalmed the Rams with 66 points the week before, with the Bobcats (and their nationally fifth-ranked offense) needing to score last to pull out a 20-17 squeaker in San Marcos. Safe to say, then, that we don't expect another CSU scoreline above 100, though the question is if we want to lay nearly a TD with the slow-motion Utah State offense and limited ex-Virginia QB Grady Brosterhous, on just seven TD passes beyond the half-mile pole this season. We acknowledge that we’ve never seen anything quite like this Ram defense that has not only fallen to the basement of national total defense stats, it’s down a mineshaft, as a hard-to-believe 535 yards per game allowed is more than 50 yards higher than the next-worst ranked defense (that would be West Virginia). Still, CSU has plenty of offense, especially with Henjy back in the fold, and having already beaten Wyoming and San Diego State in games he started suggests they're capable of something similar in Logan.
Play Colorado State
| Colorado State | 36.3 / 57 | -20.7 | 43 | 35 | +8 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Utah State | 17.3 / 24.3 | -7 | 40 | 30 | +10 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Colorado State | 10-24 | San Diego. | +1 | 57.5 | 56-49 | Utah State | 10-24 | @ Texas Sta. | +14.5 | 59 | 17-20 |
| | 10-15 | @ Texas Sta. | +15.5 | 69.5 | 27-66 | | 10-09 | Washingto. | -4 | 44 | 17-16 |
| | 10-03 | Oregon St. | +7 | 61 | 26-56 | | 10-03 | @ Boise Sta. | +19.5 | 51 | 18-37 |
|
| 11-29-24 | Utah State | 37 | 57 | 24 | 48/297 | 17/29/2/189 | 1/1 |
| Colorado State | 42 | -5 | 22 | 28/85 | 31/46/1/370 | 2/0 |
| Colorado State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:7-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:6-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Wyoming | -2.5 | W | 35-13 | OV | 46 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9 | -0.5 | W | 14-6 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern Utah | -20.5 | W | 58-24 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 17-7 | OV | | | W | 48-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | BYU | 17.5 | L | 23-41 | OV | 55 | 4.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 11.5 | 9.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | 14 | PK | 45-59 | OV | 56.5 | 3.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | L | 21-35 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Oregon State | 7 | L | 26-56 | OV | 61 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 4 | L | 14-35 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-15-26 | @ Texas State | 15.5 | L | 27-66 | OV | 69.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14.5 | 10 | L | 21-45 | OV | 36.5 |
| 10-24-26 | San Diego State | 1 | W | 56-49 | OV | 57.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 13.5 | 0 | W | 35-24 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-6 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Idaho State | -15.5 | L | 17-29 | UN | 58.5 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | L | 10-16 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Washington U | 28 | W | 14-16 | UN | 55.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 17 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Utah | 26.5 | L | 0-33 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-16 | OV | 13.5 | 15.5 | L | 0-26 | UN | 30 |
| 09-26-26 | Troy | -3 | W | 21-10 | UN | 48 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Boise State | 19.5 | W | 18-37 | OV | 51 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 11 | L | 10-28 | OV | 27 |
| 10-09-26 | Washington State | -4 | L | 17-16 | UN | 44 | -0.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 3-16 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas State | 14.5 | W | 17-20 | UN | 59 | 4.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 13.5 | 8.5 | W | 9-7 | UN | 30 |
| 10-31-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Washington State | 27 | 48 | 38 | -1 | 36 | 20 | 1-3 / 0-4 | 2-2 / 3-1 | 2-2 / 1-3 | -2.5 / -15 | -4 / +16 |
| San Diego State | 24 | -2.5 | 40(1) | | 35 | 48 | 3-1 / 0-4 | 2-2 / 0-4 | 3-1 / 3-1 | +6.3 / -25.5 | -6.5 / +7.5 |
It’s purely accidental that San Diego State got involved with a scoreline last week at Fort Collins that looks pulled from the basketball game between Brian Dutcher's Aztec hoopsters and Ali Farokhmanesh's Colorado State. Rather, that eye-popping 56-49 loss to the Rams was more down to the oddities of this particular CSU edition team that plays games more resembling video football, and not suggesting some return to the Air Coryell roots of the SDSU program back to the glorious 60s and early 70s. Unfortunately for Aztec QB Jayden Denegal, an ankle injury prevented him from gaining some confidence and padding his stats last week against the Rams, instead allowing freshman Stone Saunders to pretend he was Don Horn, Dennis Shaw or Brian Sipe for 60 minutes against CSU’s non-defense and pass for a whopping 369 yards and a couple of TDs. As Denegal has only passed for as many as 200 yards five times the past two seasons, with 256 the high, head coach Sean Lewis has already made the call to stick with Saunders at least for this week as the 3-5 Aztecs are running out of time to secure bowl eligibility. That carrot has already been removed from 1-7 Washington State, but the Cougs really haven’t played that badly in recent weeks, hanging within earshot of possible playoff contenders like Arizona, Oregon State, and Boise State, and actually level with the Pac-12 frontrunner Broncos at 10 apiece into the fourth quarter last week at Pullman before Boise broke loose for three late TDs in a deceiving 31-10 final. After hiding freshman QB Owen Eshelman for the first half of the season, first-year head coach Kirby Moore has turned him loose the past two weeks. Eshelman passed for 480 yards as the Cougs have at least been displaying a sharper edge than when UC Davis transfer Caden Pinnick was glad to dink-and-dunk to his heart’s content without really throwing the ball downfield the first month of the campaign. Wazzu has also been facing some better teams than San Diego State and making a fist of it in recent weeks; against the Aztecs, that sort of effort can possibly get rewarded at Snapdragon.
Play Washington State
10/27 4:53 AM PDT — With QB Jayden Denegal nursing a sore ankle, head coach Sean Lewis went with Stone Saunders last week at Colorado State, and the freshman responded with 369 pass yards and a pair of TDs in a wild 56-49 loss. Though Denegal could be available by the weekend, Lewis has already announced that Saunders will get the starting nod once again for the Aztecs on Saturday at Snapdragon vs. the Cougars.
| Washington State | 18.7 / 32 | -13.3 | 38 | 29 | +12.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| San Diego State | 29.7 / 48.3 | -18.7 | 40 | 35 | +6.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Washington State | 10-24 | Boise Sta. | +14.5 | 52.5 | 10-31 | San Diego State | 10-24 | @ Colorado . | -1 | 57.5 | 49-56 |
| | 10-17 | @ Oregon St. | +19 | 52 | 30-48 | | 10-17 | Fresno St. | +6.5 | 46.5 | 26-23 |
| | 10-09 | @ Utah State | +4 | 44 | 16-17 | | 10-10 | @ Oregon St. | +14.5 | 52.5 | 14-66 |
|
| 09-06-25 | San Diego State | 13 | 46.5 | 10 | 30/82 | 15/30/0/133 | 0/0 |
| Washington State | 36 | -1.5 | 19 | 36/139 | 28/42/0/257 | 1/0 |
| Washington State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-7 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:4-2-1 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Washington U | 24 | W | 10-24 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 14 | W | 0-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kansas State | 17.5 | L | 7-34 | UN | 48.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10 | 10 | PK | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Duquesne | -38.5 | W | 48-7 | OV | 52 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Arizona U | 11 | W | 24-34 | OV | 47 | 3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Fresno State | -2 | L | 6-26 | UN | 45 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-6 | UN | 22.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ Utah State | 4 | W | 16-17 | UN | 44 | 0.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 16-3 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oregon State | 19 | W | 30-48 | OV | 52 | 6.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 10.5 | L | 10-27 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Boise State | 14.5 | L | 10-31 | UN | 52.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Diego State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Portland St | -38.5 | L | 53-20 | OV | 61 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | W | 29-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ UCLA | 13.5 | L | 10-28 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | James Madison | -3 | L | 13-26 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 0-19 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Toledo | 2.5 | L | 16-41 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Texas State | 10 | W | 31-29 | OV | 57.5 | 2.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 13.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 29 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon State | 14.5 | L | 14-66 | OV | 52.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 8.5 | L | 7-38 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Fresno State | 6.5 | W | 26-23 | OV | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 16-10 | OV | 23 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Colorado State | -1 | L | 49-56 | OV | 57.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 13.5 | 0 | L | 24-35 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/27 11:11 pm |
| Texas State | 33 | 63.5 | 32 | | 32 | 40 | 4-1 / 0-2 | 3-2 / 0-2 | 3-2 / 2-0 | +20.8 / -27 | -13 / +10 |
| Boise State | 38 | -10 | 20(3) | -15 | 20 | 38 | 3-0 / 3-1 | 1-2 / 3-1 | 3-0 / 2-2 | +17 / +11.5 | -19 / -1.5 |
The CW might as well make Boise State part of its regular programming lineup as the Broncos continue to be featured in the network’s late-night slot on Saturdays. It’s good watching, too, as Spencer Danielson’s team is starting to resemble the playoff qualifier featuring Ashton Jeanty from two years ago. Similarities abound, including an early close loss at Oregon (which is looking like it might not mean that much this season) for the only blemish in front of Halloween. We also never thought we’d see the likes of Jeanty again on the blue carpet until junior Dylan Riley started doing a pretty good impersonation this season, now a few lengths ahead of Tennessee’s DeSean Bishop and West Virginia’s Cam Cook as the nation’s leading rusher with a Jeanty-like 963 yards through seven games. That sort of infantry diversion has also made things a heckuva lot easier on senior QB Maddux Madsen, yet to toss a pick and with 14 TD passes through seven weeks as he’s posting similar numbers to 2024 (which included 23 TD passes) when he was handing the ball off to Jeanty. This might not be easy on Saturday, however, as Texas State looks one of the few “new Pac-12" entries liable to put up a fight vs. the Broncos, with the nation’s fifth-ranked offense (518 yards per game) and its own contender for national rushing honors in Torrance Burgess, Jr, not far behind Riley and ranking 4th with 899 yards. Stylistically, GJ Kinne’s full-throttle offense has a similar look to Lane Kiffin’s, a ground-oriented, fast-tempo attack also featuring a legit dual-threat QB in soph Brad Jackson, who has already accounted for nearly 2,000 yards of total offense and 19 TDs via pass and run and likely to become pretty wealthy if he wishes when the transfer portal opens In a few months. Summing up, this has the makings of a pier six-brawl in Boise, and noting some of the scorelines posted by these sides and the fact they’re combining for 72 points per game, the low 60s total doesn’t seem high enough. Moreover, considering the horsepower of the Bobcat offense, Boise’s likely lead will probably never feel safe.
Play the Over
| Texas State | 38.3 / 25 | +13.3 | 32 | 39 | -13.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Boise State | 35.3 / 19.7 | +15.7 | 20 | 35 | -14.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Texas State | 10-24 | Utah State | -14.5 | 59 | 20-17 | Boise State | 10-24 | @ Washingto. | -14.5 | 52.5 | 31-10 |
| | 10-15 | Colorado . | -15.5 | 69.5 | 66-27 | | 10-10 | @ Fresno St. | -9 | 48.5 | 38-31 |
| | 10-03 | @ San Diego. | -10 | 57.5 | 29-31 | | 10-03 | Utah State | -19.5 | 51 | 37-18 |
| Texas State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-3-1 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Texas | 29.5 | L | 7-59 | OV | 61.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-14 | P | 14 | 17.5 | L | 7-28 | OV | 33 |
| 09-12-26 | Tex San Antonio | -1.5 | L | 26-31 | UN | 65.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 14 | -0.5 | W | 17-7 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Texas | -3 | W | 49-35 | OV | 62.5 | -0.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 13.5 | -2 | L | 28-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Incarnate Word | -30 | W | 63-10 | OV | 66 | | W | 28-7 | OV | | | W | 42-10 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ San Diego State | -10 | L | 29-31 | OV | 57.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 29 |
| 10-15-26 | Colorado State | -15.5 | W | 66-27 | OV | 69.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14.5 | -10 | W | 45-21 | OV | 36.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Utah State | -14.5 | L | 20-17 | UN | 59 | -4.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 13.5 | -8.5 | L | 7-9 | UN | 30 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Boise State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Oregon | 25.5 | W | 27-34 | OV | 53 | 7 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 14.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Memphis | -9.5 | W | 38-20 | OV | 55 | -3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -6 | L | 17-20 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | South Dakota | -28.5 | L | 38-24 | OV | 61.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-14 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Western Michigan | -8 | W | 32-7 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 8-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4.5 | W | 15-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Utah State | -19.5 | L | 37-18 | OV | 51 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -11 | W | 28-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Fresno State | -9 | L | 38-31 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 15-13 | OV | 9.5 | -4.5 | W | 25-20 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Washington State | -14.5 | W | 31-10 | UN | 52.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| No Illinois | 13 | 56 | 52 | | 50 | 44 | 0-3 / 0-4 | 0-3 / 1-3 | 2-1 / 2-2 | -20 / -26 | +4 / +20.5 |
| UNLV | 44 | -21.5 | 29(1) | -24 | 28 | 37 | 2-1 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 2-2 | 1-2 / 1-3 | +2.7 / -1.3 | -0.5 / -4.5 |
There’s a domino effect in the coaching carousel when one school doesn’t make an expected move. Take Maryland, which waited until last week to finally hit the eject button on Mike Locksley, whose last half-season with the Terps was predictably brutal and cost Maryland a year’s head-start on any rebuild. Moreover, had the coaching carousel included College Park last season, there’s a good chance that regional native and UNLV HC Dan Mullen would have been interested, as it’s no secret that Mullen might be using the Rebel job as a springboard back into the Power 4 (as Barry Odom did before his move to Purdue). Word in Mountain West circles is that Mullen might be interested in the job with the Terps, not the worst scenario for UNLV administrators, reportedly cheering the possibility that an accompanying buyout (as the case with Odom two years ago) will help the athletic department better balance its books for the fiscal year. Now, however, we wonder if Mullen is still in the mix on the carousel after the Rebs have dropped a bit from their lofty Mountain West perch a year ago--stay tuned. We’re talking about Mullen and his future job prospects because it’s far more interesting than any discussions about woeful Northern Illinois, this week’s UNLV foe that has yet to win a game this season for interim Rob Harley. Harley is only on the job because predecessor Michael Hammock left for a job on the Seattle Seahawks staff in February (good career move there, we’d say), but the cupboard was left so bare in DeKalb that not even the ghost of Vince Lombardi could likely save this year’s Huskies. NIU’s average loss margin vs. FBS foes this season is almost 27 points per game, and Western Carolina transfer QB Taron Dickens must be wondering what he got himself into with no weapons like he had at his disposal in the SoCon when tossing a whopping 38 TD passes a year ago. This fall, it’s only six TD passes just past the half-mile pole, and we’ve simply got better things to do than back a team with the nation’s 129th-ranked offense (barely 300 yards per game) and even worse in scoring offense (ranks 135th at a mere 15.1 ppg), and whose only spread cover came against a disinterested Arizona team that was goofing around a bit too much to cover a 5-TD spread in Tucson. Here’s a chance for Jackson Arnold and the Rebel offense (scoring better than 30 points per game during the current four-game stretch) to have a little fun.
Play UNLV
| No Illinois | 17 / 41.7 | -24.7 | 51 | 43 | +5.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| UNLV | 27.7 / 26.3 | +1.3 | 29 | 30 | +1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| No Illinois | 10-24 | Hawaii | +2.5 | 49 | 21-56 | UNLV | 10-17 | @ Air Force | PK | 48.5 | 31-41 |
| | 10-17 | @ Wyoming | +7.5 | 43 | 23-41 | | 10-10 | North Dak. | +3 | 48 | 13-7 |
| | 10-10 | Air Force | +6.5 | 48.5 | 7-28 | | 10-03 | California | PK | 51.5 | 39-31 |
| No Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-7 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-7 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Iowa | 31 | L | 0-40 | UN | 44.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-20 | OV | 10 | 18.5 | L | 0-33 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Illinois State | 2.5 | L | 24-28 | OV | 48 | | L | 0-14 | OV | | | L | 17-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arizona U | 34.5 | W | 17-42 | OV | 50 | 7.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 10-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia State | 8.5 | L | 14-35 | UN | 56.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Air Force | 6.5 | L | 7-28 | UN | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Wyoming | 7.5 | L | 23-41 | OV | 43 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 7.5 | 4 | L | 6-20 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Hawaii | 2.5 | L | 21-56 | OV | 49 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 14-35 | OV | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UNLV |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-3-1 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Memphis | -4.5 | L | 21-27 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13 | -3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Hawaii | -1.5 | W | 21-6 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ North Texas | -3 | L | 6-44 | UN | 58.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-13 | P | 13 | -1.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Akron | -13 | W | 38-10 | UN | 53 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7 | L | 14-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | California | 0 | W | 39-31 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 24-7 | OV | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | North Dakota State | 3 | W | 13-7 | UN | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Air Force | 0 | L | 31-41 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 17-13 | OV | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| KEY |
| Score | The predicted score for an event |
| PR | The team's Power Rating |
| GS Line | The GoldSheet line, calculated using each team's Power Rating. |
| Avg. PR | The average Power Rating of a team over the course of the season. |
| Avg. OPR | The average of a team's opponent Power Rating on the day that they played. |
| SUR (H/A) | The team's straight-up-record, both at home and on the road. |
| ATS (H/A) | The team's record against-the-spread. |
| O/U (H/A) | The team's over-under record. |
| Pts. Diff. (H/A) | The team's +/- point differential. |
| Avg. Ln. (H/A) | The average line the team has had over the course of the season. |
| PF/PA | The average points a team has scored and allowed. |
| FD | The total number of first downs. |
| RA/RY | The number of rushing attempts and yards. |
| PC/PA/I/PY | The number of passing completions, attempts, interceptions and yards. |
| RA/RY | The number of fumbles and fumbles lost. |
COPYRIGHT 2026 © THE GOLD SHEET
ALL RIGHT RESERVED.