October 20th
| Middle Tenn St | 17 | 46.5 | 46 | | 47 | 46 | 3-0 / 0-3 | 3-0 / 1-2 | 1-2 / 1-2 | +11.3 / -22.3 | -6 / +13.5 |
| Florida Intl | 26 | -10 | 41(2) | -7 | 41 | 37 | 3-0 / 0-3 | 2-1 / 1-1-1 | 1-2 / 1-2 | +16.3 / -6.3 | -17.5 / +7.5 |
FIU has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings with a pair of double-digit wins. The Panthers earned a 56-30 road win in Murfreesboro, despite out-gaining the Raiders by only 37 yards in that contest. Six of the last seven meetings have gone over the total. Both teams are on equal rest after playing last Tuesday. Middle Tennessee snapped a brief losing skid with a 33-30 home win over Delaware last week. The Raiders were the beneficiary of 13 Blue Hen penalties that produced over 100 yards in Middle Tennessee's favor. Florida International is looking to get back in the win column after falling to Jacksonville State on a last-minute field goal. The Panthers out-gained the Gamecocks, had more first downs, won the turnover battle and held a sizable edge in time of possession, but couldn't overcome a pair of costly missed field goals. FIU kicker Robert Czeremcha had a 38-yard opportunity at the end of the second quarter and a 49-yard opportunity at the end of the fourth quarter, but missed both. The Panthers' defense allowed Jacksonville State to score 27 points after holding its first five opponents to an average of 12.2 points per game. Ultimately, we have some interest in the under in this contest. Conditions are expected to be quite breezy at Pitbull Stadium in Miami with gusts up to 20mph through out the game. As we mentioned, the Panthers' defense has been stout all season with the exception of last week's stumble against the Gamecocks. And we're willing to give Middle Tennessee a little bit of a pass for last week's performance against Delaware. The Blue Hens used three quarterbacks the week prior against Liberty, so Middle Tennessee had no clue who/what to prepare for in last week's contest. Last year's game between the Panthers and Raiders saw five turnovers and FIU scored 29 points over the course of eight minutes from the end of the third quarter into the beginning of the fourth quarter. As long as we can avoid a crazy scenario like that, we believe this will eventually be a low-scoring affair.
Play the Under
| Middle Tenn St | 15.3 / 36 | -20.7 | 47 | 36 | +10 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Florida Intl | 22 / 11 | +11 | 41 | 46 | -14 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Middle Tenn St | 10-13 | Delaware | +1 | 49.5 | 33-30 | Florida Intl | 10-13 | @ Jacksonvi. | +3 | 44 | 24-27 |
| | 10-03 | @ Kansas | +21.5 | 51 | 0-55 | | 10-07 | New Mexic. | -7 | 47 | 22-3 |
| | 09-26 | @ Jacksonvi. | +7 | 50.5 | 13-23 | | 09-26 | Long Isla. | -37.5 | 54 | 20-3 |
|
| 11-08-25 | Florida Intl | 56 | 50.5 | 23 | 38/144 | 17/28/2/257 | 1/0 |
| Middle Tenn St | 30 | -1 | 18 | 24/33 | 33/54/1/331 | 3/2 |
| 11-30-24 | Middle Tenn St | 24 | 51 | 17 | 29/121 | 21/33/1/256 | 0/0 |
| Florida Intl | 35 | -10 | 22 | 39/144 | 19/27/0/319 | 2/0 |
| Middle Tenn St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Murray State | -22.5 | W | 38-14 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Marshall | 11.5 | W | 26-28 | UN | 56 | 5.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | W | 13-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Nevada | 3.5 | W | 27-20 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 7 | L | 13-23 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Kansas | 21.5 | L | 0-55 | OV | 51 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 11.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 26 |
| 10-13-26 | Delaware | 1 | W | 33-30 | OV | 49.5 | 0.5 | W | 5-3 | UN | 9.5 | 0 | L | 12-16 | OV | 24 |
| 10-20-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida Intl |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-2-1 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:4-0-1 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ South Florida | 14.5 | W | 9-19 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-6 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Buffalo U | -8 | W | 33-20 | OV | 47.5 | -3 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10 | -5.5 | W | 21-6 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | 5 | L | 10-16 | UN | 62.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | PK | 7-10 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Long Island | -37.5 | L | 20-3 | UN | 54 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-3 | OV | |
| 10-07-26 | New Mexico State | -7 | W | 22-3 | UN | 47 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4 | W | 10-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-13-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 3 | PK | 24-27 | OV | 44 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-20-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Missouri State | 24 | 54.5 | 47 | | 47 | 43 | 2-1 / 0-3 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 0-3 | +10.3 / -27 | -3.5 / +22.5 |
| Delaware | 20 | -3 | 41.5(1) | -6.5 | 43 | 48 | 2-1 / 0-3 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 0-3 / 2-1 | +9 / -17 | -9.5 / +13 |
This will be the first meeting at the FBS level between the Bears and Blue Hens. Delaware had an extra day to prep for this one after falling at Middle Tennessee last week. The Blue Hens have dropped each of their last three (both straight-up and against the spread) since the injury to starting QB Nick Minicucci. Tyler Bell threw for over 300 yards in last week's game against the Blue Raiders, but Minicucci is one of the best quarterbacks at this C-USA level and leaves some big shoes to fill. Delaware head coach called Minicucci's status "week to week," which seemingly confirms that his return is unlikely on Tuesday. Missouri State earned a small upset win over Kennesaw State last Wednesday as a short home 'dog. The Bears' last three games have all stayed under the total. Getting a field goal with Missouri State feels pretty generous in this spot and we have some interest in the Bears. Missouri State made the QB switch to Henry Belin IV last week against Kennesaw State, and the Duke transfer rewarded that trust by going 28-of-39 for 300 yards and two touchdowns. Belin IV is a fifth-year senior who played his previous four seasons at Duke. Even though he is still somewhat of an unknown quantity in Conference-USA, his pedigree is still a notch above what other teams in the league are producing at the QB position. As we mentioned in our Middle Tennessee-Florida International preview, Delaware had the advantage of smoke-and-mirrors on their side last week. The Blue Raiders were forced to prepare for four quarterbacks last week (three saw playing time the previous week against Liberty, plus the small chance that Minicucci returned). Now that it appears Tyler Bell has the reins of Delaware's offense, Missouri State has a much better idea of what to prepare for this week compared to what Middle Tennessee had to do last week.
Play Missouri State
| Missouri State | 20.3 / 29.7 | -9.3 | 47 | 34 | +10.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Delaware | 15.7 / 35 | -19.3 | 43 | 33 | +8.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Missouri State | 10-14 | Kennesaw . | +2.5 | 53 | 24-21 | Delaware | 10-13 | @ Middle Te. | -1 | 49.5 | 30-33 |
| | 10-08 | @ Western K. | -2 | 56.5 | 13-34 | | 10-02 | Liberty | +7 | 51.5 | 14-30 |
| | 09-26 | @ SMU | +30.5 | 59.5 | 24-34 | | 09-26 | @ Virginia | +20 | 52 | 3-42 |
| Missouri State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1H SUR:1-5 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:1-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Texas A&M | 38.5 | L | 0-50 | UN | 53.5 | 10.5 | W | 0-9 | UN | 14 | 24.5 | W | 0-19 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Lindenwood | -16.5 | W | 48-14 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Marshall | 4 | L | 24-30 | OV | 52.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ SMU | 30.5 | W | 24-34 | UN | 59.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 14.5 | 19.5 | W | 10-14 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Western Kentucky | -2 | L | 13-34 | UN | 56.5 | 0 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-21 | UN | 28 |
| 10-14-26 | Kennesaw State | 2.5 | W | 24-21 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 6-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-20-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Delaware |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Merrimack College | -31.5 | W | 42-7 | UN | 56.5 | 0 | W | 7-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 20.5 | W | 26-35 | OV | 53.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 11.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Coastal Carolina | -4.5 | W | 22-14 | UN | 56.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | -3 | L | 15-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Virginia | 20 | L | 3-42 | UN | 52 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 11.5 | 10.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Liberty | 7 | L | 14-30 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 9.5 | 4 | L | 0-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-13-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | -1 | L | 30-33 | OV | 49.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-5 | UN | 9.5 | 0 | W | 16-12 | OV | 24 |
| 10-20-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Alabama | 31 | -2 | 42 | | 42 | 39 | 3-0 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 3-0 | +15.7 / -7 | -11 / +11 |
| Marshall | 27 | 66.5 | 43(2) | -1 | 40 | 43 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 0-3 / 1-2 | 1-2 / 2-1 | -1 / -22.3 | -13.5 / +11 |
This will be the first meeting between the Jaguars and Herd since South Alabama's 28-0 win in November 2023. South Alabama has scored 50+ points in back-to-back wins over UL-Monroe and Arkansas State. The Jaguars' last five games have all gone over the total. Marshall has dropped back-to-back games against James Madison and Coastal Carolina. Dating back to the end of last season, the Herd are just 1-7 against the spread over their last eight games. This total has climbed into the mid-60s, and from the South Alabama side, we certainly see why. The Jaguars' last four games have seen 77, 66, 87 and 105 points. In conjunction with that, the totals have also gone through the roof. Those last four games have seen an average closing total of 55.3, so we're looking at a total on Tuesday that is significantly higher than what oddsmakers have been offering in South Alabama's games over the last month. Betting the under in a Jaguar game feels like a trip to the dentist at the moment, but we have some reservations about Marshall's ability to pull its weight. The Herd have been playing roulette at QB between Carlos Del Rio-Wilson and Zion Turner. After a strong campaign last season that saw him throw 17 touchdowns with only five interceptions, Del Rio-Wilson has already matched that interception tally from a year ago. If you took away his 413-yard day against FCS-level Gardner-Webb in September, Del Rio-Wilson's completion percentage would be down 4.5-percent from last year while generating fewer touchdowns and a big drop-off in production from the running game. Both defenses have their concerns, but we're not sure Marshall is the proper dance partner that can push this game into the upper-60s and beyond.
Play the Under
| South Alabama | 43 / 43 | 0 | 42 | 36 | +3.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Marshall | 24.7 / 35.7 | -11 | 41 | 41 | -5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| South Alabama | 10-08 | @ Arkansas . | +3 | 60.5 | 56-49 | Marshall | 10-10 | Coastal C. | -4.5 | 58 | 21-27 |
| | 10-03 | UL Monroe | -13 | 56.5 | 52-35 | | 10-03 | @ James Mad. | +14.5 | 55.5 | 17-45 |
| | 09-26 | @ Kentucky | +20.5 | 54.5 | 21-45 | | 09-26 | Gardner W. | -25 | 56 | 36-35 |
| South Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:3-1-1 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-0 , O/U:4-0-1 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Louisiana | -13.5 | W | 39-14 | UN | 54 | | W | 19-7 | OV | | | W | 22-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Tulane | 10 | W | 24-28 | OV | 48 | 3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | 6.5 | W | 10-14 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | Ohio | -7 | L | 41-36 | OV | 49.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kentucky | 20.5 | L | 21-45 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | UL Monroe | -13 | W | 52-35 | OV | 56.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | W | 31-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Arkansas St | 3 | W | 56-49 | OV | 60.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | 1.5 | W | 34-28 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-20-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Marshall |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Penn State | 23 | L | 0-45 | UN | 53.5 | 7 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Middle Tenn St | -11.5 | L | 28-26 | UN | 56 | -5.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | L | 14-13 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri State | -4 | W | 30-24 | OV | 52.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Gardner Webb | -25 | L | 36-35 | OV | 56 | | L | 10-14 | OV | | | W | 27-21 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ James Madison | 14.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 55.5 | 5.5 | W | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | 9 | L | 14-38 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Coastal Carolina | -4.5 | L | 21-27 | UN | 58 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | L | 0-13 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-20-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 21st
| New Mexico State | 19 | -3 | 45 | -4 | 46 | 41 | 2-1 / 0-3 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 0-3 | +11.3 / -15.3 | -6.5 / +15 |
| Sam Houston St | 23 | 47 | 50(1) | | 48 | 43 | 1-2 / 0-3 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 1-2 / 1-2 | +13.3 / -23.3 | -3 / +21 |
The home team has won-and-covered all three meetings since Sam Houston joined New Mexico State in Conference-USA. The Aggies earned a 37-10 win last season as a short home 'dog. All three meetings in this series have stayed under the total. New Mexico State is coming off a bye after previously falling at Florida International. In the Aggies' games against FBS-level opponents, the under has gone 4-1. After playing some solid football over the first month of the season, Sam Houston has fallen off a cliff over the last ten quarters. The Bearkats were nearly beating Texas Tech at halftime three weeks ago. Since then, Sam Houston has been out-scored by a combined tally of 79-6. It's been almost a full calendar month since the Bearkats last scored a touchdown (Sept. 26). We rode the SHSU train for a couple weeks at the start of the year because it appeared that the Bearkats' offense was taking a nice step forward with Landyn Locke under center. For whatever reason, that train has hit a wall. Over the last two weeks against Liberty and Western Kentucky, Locke has gone 33-of-60 (55.0-percent) for 250 passing yards with no touchdowns and an interception. That's 4.2 yards per pass attempt. The Bearkats' offense (or lack there of) will generate the headlines, but SHSU did put together a strong defensive performance against the Hilltoppers last week. And don't pin that 49-14 loss to Texas Tech on the Bearkats' defense, either, because two of the Red Raiders' first three touchdowns were scored off a pair of pick-sixes. SHSU's defense has been better than advertised in recent weeks.
Play the Under
| New Mexico State | 18.3 / 25.7 | -7.3 | 45 | 37 | +5.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Sam Houston St | 6.7 / 33.3 | -26.7 | 45 | 29 | +16 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| New Mexico State | 10-07 | @ Florida I. | +7 | 47 | 3-22 | Sam Houston St | 10-14 | Western K. | PK | 53.5 | 3-16 |
| | 10-01 | Western K. | -2 | 56 | 34-13 | | 10-08 | @ Liberty | +13.5 | 52.5 | 3-35 |
| | 09-26 | New Mexico | +11.5 | 47.5 | 18-42 | | 09-26 | @ Texas Tech | +34.5 | 55.5 | 14-49 |
|
| 10-02-25 | Sam Houston St | 10 | -1.5 | 18 | 26/69 | 27/39/1/244 | 2/2 |
| New Mexico State | 37 | 52 | 20 | 31/95 | 19/26/0/255 | 2/1 |
| New Mexico State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:1-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Florida State | 31 | W | 17-34 | UN | 53.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 18.5 | W | 7-17 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Mercyhurst | -29 | W | 51-14 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 13-7 | OV | | | W | 23-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Hawaii | 7.5 | L | 19-29 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-9 | UN | 10 | 4 | L | 13-19 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | New Mexico | 11.5 | L | 18-42 | OV | 47.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 3-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-01-26 | Western Kentucky | -2 | W | 34-13 | UN | 56 | -0.5 | W | 6-3 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-6 | UN | 28 |
| 10-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | 7 | L | 3-22 | UN | 47 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 4 | L | 3-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sam Houston St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-5 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Troy | 15.5 | W | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 9.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Tulsa | 12.5 | W | 17-23 | UN | 51.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | W | 14-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Nicholls State | -21 | W | 59-0 | OV | 51 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Texas Tech | 34.5 | L | 14-49 | OV | 55.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 14-21 | OV | 31 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Liberty | 13.5 | L | 3-35 | UN | 52.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27 |
| 10-14-26 | Western Kentucky | 0 | L | 3-16 | UN | 53.5 | 0 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 0 | L | 3-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-21-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 22nd
| James Madison | 27 | -11.5 | 27.5 | -8 | 27 | 41 | 4-0 / 3-0 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 1-2 | +36.5 / +14 | -19 / -3.5 |
| Appalachian St | 24 | 57 | 37.5(2) | | 39 | 42 | 2-1 / 2-1 | 1-2 / 3-0 | 1-2 / 2-1 | +16.7 / -1.3 | -15.5 / +6.5 |
When you think about the rise of Sun Belt football over the last five years, this rivalry played a big role in that. The Mountaineers and Dukes played some classics when JMU first joined the conference. Each of the first three meetings featured an outright upset by a 'dog of at least seven points. After back-to-back upset wins by App State in 2023 and 2024, the Dukes squashed any hope of a threepeat with a 58-10 home win last season. James Madison out-gained App State by nearly 500 yards in that contest. The 2026 version of the 'Neers looks a lot more competitive after App State won at Coastal Carolina last week. Kidd Brewer Stadium should be rockin' for this one because App State's last two home games against Charlotte and Old Dominion were both played in a monsoon. Knock on wood, the Boone faithful are looking forward to watching a game played in somewhat-normal conditions. What started because of injury concerns has developed into a legitimate two-QB system with Malachi Singleton and Henry Hasselbeck both running the Mountaineers' offense. Singleton, the more-polished passer, went 12-of-14 through the air for 151 passing yards last week at Coastal Carolina. Hasselbeck, the mobile runner, generated 125 yards on 21 carries while also throwing a touchdown pass. James Madison improved to 7-0 straight-up, 6-1 against the spread following last week's home win over Georgia State. Over the last four weeks, the Dukes have scored an average of 41.8 points per game. Oddsmakers have opened this game in line with our numbers, but we're looking to take the points with App State. As we mentioned, the 'Neers have played multiple games this season that you can essentially throw out. That win over Charlotte ended at 1am ET. App State may be creeping below the national radar, and there's no better place to have a coming-out party than a stand-alone showcase on an ESPN network on a Thursday night in Boone.
Play App State
| James Madison | 40.3 / 21 | +19.3 | 26 | 41 | -10 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Appalachian St | 23 / 27.7 | -4.7 | 39 | 35 | +1.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| James Madison | 10-17 | Georgia S. | -8 | 58 | 49-22 | Appalachian St | 10-16 | @ Coastal C. | PK | 48.5 | 35-32 |
| | 10-10 | @ Georgia S. | -7 | 51.5 | 27-24 | | 10-10 | Old Domin. | -9 | 46 | 3-10 |
| | 10-03 | Marshall | -14.5 | 55.5 | 45-17 | | 09-26 | @ NC State | +13 | 56 | 31-41 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Appalachian St | 10 | 53 | 10 | 15/1 | 14/37/1/145 | 1/0 |
| James Madison | 58 | -21 | 32 | 54/324 | 22/35/1/303 | 0/0 |
| 11-23-24 | James Madison | 20 | -7.5 | 22 | 38/168 | 21/36/1/232 | 1/1 |
| Appalachian St | 34 | 57.5 | 17 | 38/145 | 12/23/0/216 | 0/0 |
| James Madison |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-0 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Liberty | -6 | W | 20-13 | UN | 51 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wagner | -46.5 | W | 87-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 42-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Diego State | 3 | W | 26-13 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 19-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Old Dominion | -7 | W | 46-20 | OV | 44 | -0.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | W | 30-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Marshall | -14.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 55.5 | -5.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -9 | W | 38-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Southern | -7 | L | 27-24 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 6-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia State | -8 | W | 49-22 | OV | 58 | -3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -6 | W | 35-10 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-22-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Appalachian St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Maine | -21 | W | 55-3 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ East Carolina | 6.5 | W | 27-24 | UN | 55.5 | 3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13 | 4 | W | 17-10 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Charlotte | -16.5 | L | 26-21 | UN | 52.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -9.5 | L | 13-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ NC State | 13 | W | 31-41 | OV | 56 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | L | 10-28 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Old Dominion | -9 | L | 3-10 | UN | 46 | -2.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6 | L | 0-0 | UN | 23 |
| 10-16-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | 0 | W | 35-32 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 14-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-22-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| East Carolina | 17 | 55 | 35.5 | | 34 | 40 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 1-2 / 1-2 | 0-3 / 1-2 | +15.3 / -16 | -18 / +8.5 |
| Memphis | 27 | -10 | 27.5(2) | -10 | 26 | 35 | 3-0 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 2-2 | +22.3 / +6.3 | -19.5 / -3 |
East Carolina has won each of the last three meetings, including a 31-27 home win last season. Memphis has out-gained the Pirates in each of the last two meetings, but ECU has made the necessary plays in crunch time. Both teams are coming off disappointing losses last week. East Carolina lost at UAB as a 5.5-point road favorite and Memphis lost at Tulane as a 6.5-point road favorite. Since allowing 48 points to Alabama in the opener, East Carolina's last five games have all stayed under the total. That's the only direction that we can look in this one. During the preseason, much was made about the exodus of East Carolina's offensive personnel. Former offensive coordinator John David Baker left Greenville for Ole Miss. Former QB Katin Houser is now at Illinois. East Carolina's offense looks nothing like previous editions of the Pirates' attack. But we're now beginning to ask some questions about Memphis QB Marcus Stokes. The former D-II transfer has gone 31-of-58 (53.4-percent) over the last two weeks with eight sacks and three interceptions. He may be dealing with a few more bumps-and-bruises at this time of year compared to what he experienced at West Florida, especially since the Tigers are about to play their eighth game after opening the season in Week 0 at UNLV. And let's not pretend that Charles Huff's teams aren't prone to a late-season collapse. Last year at Southern Miss, the Eagles lost their last four games (4-1 to the under down the stretch). Memphis fans are hopeful that last week’s stumble was a small blip, but that remains to be seen.
Play the Under
| East Carolina | 29 / 17 | +12 | 35 | 46 | -17.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Memphis | 38 / 17.3 | +20.7 | 27 | 42 | -13.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| East Carolina | 10-15 | @ UAB | -4.5 | 49 | 17-30 | Memphis | 10-16 | @ Tulane | -6.5 | 55.5 | 17-31 |
| | 10-10 | Rice | -10 | 46.5 | 28-12 | | 10-10 | UAB | -15 | 55 | 38-13 |
| | 09-26 | NC Central | -37.5 | 58 | 42-9 | | 10-03 | @ Charlotte | -18.5 | 52 | 59-8 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Memphis | 27 | 57 | 24 | 33/240 | 33/44/1/217 | 0/0 |
| East Carolina | 31 | -3 | 24 | 38/122 | 23/34/0/332 | 2/1 |
| East Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:0-5-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Alabama | 28 | L | 10-48 | OV | 52.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 16.5 | L | 7-38 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Appalachian St | -6.5 | L | 24-27 | UN | 55.5 | -3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13 | -4 | L | 10-17 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Old Dominion | 2.5 | W | 20-17 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | NC Central | -37.5 | L | 42-9 | UN | 58 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 42-3 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | Rice | -10 | W | 28-12 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-15-26 | @ UAB | -4.5 | L | 17-30 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 14-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-22-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Memphis |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ UNLV | 4.5 | W | 27-21 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13 | 3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 28 |
| 09-05-26 | Arkansas St | -10.5 | W | 42-24 | OV | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 21-17 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Boise State | 9.5 | L | 20-38 | OV | 55 | 3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | 6 | W | 20-17 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tenn Martin | -33.5 | L | 45-21 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 24-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Charlotte | -18.5 | W | 59-8 | OV | 52 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -10.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | UAB | -15 | W | 38-13 | UN | 55 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -8.5 | L | 10-13 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-16-26 | @ Tulane | -6.5 | L | 17-31 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-23 | OV | 28 |
| 10-22-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Liberty | 34 | -8 | 30.5 | -13.5 | 33 | 44 | 3-0 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 2-1 | 1-2 / 1-2 | +23 / +8.7 | -19 / -1 |
| Kennesaw State | 17 | 50 | 45(1) | | 43 | 47 | 1-2 / 0-3 | 2-1 / 2-1 | 1-2 / 0-3 | +10.7 / -13 | -8.5 / +13 |
Kennesaw has won-and-covered both meetings with the Flames since making the move to Conference-USA. Last year's 48-42 overtime affair was one of the best under-the-radar games of the college football season. Neither team held a lead of more than seven points as the Flames and Owls took turns landing haymakers through out the entire contest. They combined for 955 total yards and 49 first downs. Liberty is coming off a bye after winning each of its last five games. The Flames rebounded nicely from that Week 1 loss at James Madison, holding the last four opponents to an average of 12.3 points per game. Kennesaw is hoping to catch a break because the Owls have lost their last three games by a combined seven points. Dating back to the end of last season, seven of Kennesaw's last eight games have stayed under the total. The Owls lost to Missouri State on a walk-off field goal as time expired. Slowly but surely, Jamey Chadwell is beginning to convince fans and pundits that this isn't the same Liberty program that we have seen over the past few seasons. In a trend that started with Hugh Freeze before he left for Auburn, the Flames gained notoriety for suffering head-scratching losses as a big favorite. Chadwell reportedly battled some health concerns over the past year, and now with a clean bill of health and a focused roster, the Flames are really making some noise. Liberty has won-and-covered its last four games with an average cover margin of 16.0 points per game. Sprinkle in some of the revenge angle after last year's loss and the Flames look poised for another strong performance in this one.
Play Liberty
| Liberty | 33 / 11.3 | +21.7 | 34 | 44 | -7.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Kennesaw State | 20.3 / 22.7 | -2.3 | 43 | 41 | +2.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Liberty | 10-08 | Sam Houst. | -13.5 | 52.5 | 35-3 | Kennesaw State | 10-14 | @ Missouri . | -2.5 | 53 | 21-24 |
| | 10-02 | @ Delaware | -7 | 51.5 | 30-14 | | 10-07 | Jacksonvi. | +3 | 48.5 | 26-27 |
| | 09-24 | @ Coastal C. | -2.5 | 50 | 34-17 | | 09-26 | @ Arkansas . | +6.5 | 53 | 14-17 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Kennesaw State | 48 | -2.5 | 25 | 43/214 | 14/23/0/240 | 1/0 |
| Liberty | 42 | 56 | 24 | 57/291 | 12/21/0/212 | 2/1 |
| Liberty |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ James Madison | 6 | L | 13-20 | UN | 51 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Gardner Webb | -28.5 | L | 24-23 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 14-6 | OV | | | L | 17-20 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Ball State | -14.5 | W | 51-15 | OV | 49.5 | -4.5 | W | 13-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 23-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-24-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | -2.5 | W | 34-17 | OV | 50 | -0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | L | 10-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-02-26 | @ Delaware | -7 | W | 30-14 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4 | W | 20-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-08-26 | Sam Houston St | -13.5 | W | 35-3 | UN | 52.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27 |
| 10-22-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kennesaw State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-5 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-03-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -21.5 | W | 47-0 | UN | 50.5 | 0 | W | 19-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 40-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia State | -7.5 | L | 17-31 | UN | 55.5 | -2.5 | L | 3-6 | UN | 12.5 | -4.5 | L | 3-21 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Tennessee U | 35 | W | 9-42 | UN | 60 | 9.5 | L | 3-15 | OV | 14.5 | 21.5 | W | 3-21 | UN | 34 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Arkansas St | 6.5 | W | 14-17 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-07-26 | Jacksonville St | 3 | W | 26-27 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | W | 16-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-14-26 | @ Missouri State | -2.5 | L | 21-24 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-6 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-22-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 23rd
| Massachusetts | 13 | 53.5 | 46.5 | | 45 | 48 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 1-3 / 1-2 | +6 / +12.7 | -13.5 / +10 |
| Connecticut | 31 | -12 | 38(1) | -9.5 | 40 | 35 | 1-2 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 1-2 | +8 / +13 | -1.5 / +1 |
UConn has won each of the last three meetings, although these regional foes did not play last season. For what it's worth, now-UConn head coach Jason Candle did not face the Minutemen last season when he was at Toledo, so it's also been a couple years since he's seen this version of UMass. The Huskies are coming off a bye after previously earning a small upset win over Temple. That win over the Owls looked pretty good at the time, but perhaps not so much at the moment after Temple lost as a 21-point home favorite last week. Unfortunately for UMass, the Minutemen have fallen to earth in a hurry after a 4-0 start. Five of UMass' last six games have stayed under the total. Since the injury to starting QB Pop Watson, the Minutemen have failed to score 20 points in losses to Eastern Michigan, Miami (Oh) and Buffalo. As we go to print on Tuesday, there's been no update from UMass to suggest that Watson will be cleared for this one while he battles a foot/ankle injury. It doesn't seem like much because UConn typically doesn't move the college football needle very far, but the Huskies do represent a significant jump in class compared to what UMass has faced in recent weeks. Sagarin maintains a rating of every FBS and FCS-level team across the country and UConn enters this week at No. 94. Here's where UMass' last five opponents rank: 237th (Sacred Heart), 230th (Stonehill), 217th (Sacramento State), 139th (Eastern Michigan), 108th (Miami-Oh) and 128th (Buffalo). We tip our cap to the Minutemen for keeping things close and competitive over the last two weeks against the RedHawks and Bulls, but UConn should take care of business with relative ease.
Play UConn
| Massachusetts | 17 / 27.7 | -10.7 | 44 | 45 | +2 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Connecticut | 32 / 28.7 | +3.3 | 40 | 33 | +4 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Massachusetts | 10-17 | @ Buffalo U | +6 | 43.5 | 18-25 | Connecticut | 10-10 | @ Temple | +3.5 | 55.5 | 34-20 |
| | 10-10 | Miami Ohio | +6 | 44.5 | 19-20 | | 10-03 | Syracuse | +6.5 | 51.5 | 41-42 |
| | 10-03 | Eastern M. | -5.5 | 48.5 | 14-38 | | 09-26 | @ Miami Ohio | +2.5 | 52.5 | 21-24 |
|
| 11-30-24 | Connecticut | 47 | -8 | 22 | 41/253 | 15/26/1/181 | 1/0 |
| Massachusetts | 42 | 50 | 22 | 42/184 | 20/32/0/206 | 2/0 |
| Massachusetts |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Rutgers | 29.5 | W | 37-21 | OV | 55 | 7.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 17.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Sacred Heart | -23.5 | W | 37-10 | UN | 53.5 | | W | 17-0 | OV | | | W | 23-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Stonehill | -31 | L | 36-14 | UN | 51 | | W | 13-7 | OV | | | W | 13-7 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Sacramento State | -6 | W | 35-6 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 21-6 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Eastern Michigan | -5.5 | L | 14-38 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Miami Ohio | 6 | W | 19-20 | UN | 44.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | 3 | L | 10-14 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Buffalo U | 6 | L | 18-25 | UN | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 7.5 | 4 | W | 15-8 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Connecticut |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-0 , PSR:5-0 , O/U:5-0-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lafayette | -21.5 | W | 56-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Maryland | 11 | L | 14-38 | UN | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 7 | L | 7-17 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ So Mississippi | -3.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 54.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 27-6 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Ohio | 2.5 | L | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Syracuse | 6.5 | W | 41-42 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-6 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 14-27 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Temple | 3.5 | W | 34-20 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 10.5 | 3 | W | 24-17 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-23-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Duke | 23 | 47 | 20.5 | | 20 | 23 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 1-3 / 2-0 | +23.3 / +0.5 | -16.5 / +1 |
| Virginia | 20 | -2.5 | 22.5(2) | PK | 19 | 16 | 4-0 / 0-2 | 3-1 / 0-1-1 | 2-2 / 0-2 | +31 / -20.5 | -21.5 / +5 |
This will be the third meeting in less than 12 months between the Blue Devils and Cavaliers. Virginia earned a 34-17 road win at Duke in the regular season, and the Blue Devils got revenge with an overtime win in the ACC Championship Game three weeks later. Both contests stayed under their respective totals. Both teams have already dropped a pair of conference games, so we are highly-unlikely to see either squad compete for that crown in 2026. Duke has lost back-to-back games against Georgia Tech and North Carolina, while Virginia is coming off a road loss at SMU. On the Cavaliers' side, it's been a rinse-and-repeat story for the last three weeks: If Beau Pribula can't run, then this offense is broken. Pribula opened the year by running for 110 yards on 15 carries against NC State in the Week 0 opener. Anyone that watched that game and saw him invite contact said to themselves, "There's no way he's making it through the season." He's been making it through the season, but he hasn't come close to sniffing a productive game like that since. Over the last three weeks against Florida State, Syracuse and SMU (not exactly a murderer's row of defenses), Pribula has gone 38-of-73 (52.1-percent) with three touchdowns and 12 sacks. With that being said, Virginia's defense held Duke to an average of 294.0 yards in last year's meetings. Take away Duke's points in overtime in the ACC Championship Game and the Blue Devils scored a total of 37 points in two games against the Cavaliers' defense. With so much familiarity built between these two programs over the last year, we can only look toward the under once again.
Play the Under
10/20 2:25 PM PDT — Virginia's wide receiver unit is dealing with a handful of injuries. Rico Flores will miss this contest with a knee injury, while Kameron Courtney is questionable after missing last week's loss to SMU.
| Duke | 35.7 / 19.7 | +16 | 19 | 35 | -16.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Virginia | 16 / 28.7 | -12.7 | 20 | 22 | -1.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Duke | 10-17 | North Car. | -3 | 47 | 20-24 | Virginia | 10-17 | @ SMU | +10 | 51 | 13-23 |
| | 10-10 | @ Georgia T. | -4.5 | 45.5 | 25-28 | | 10-10 | Syracuse | -14 | 49 | 28-25 |
| | 09-26 | William &. | -42.5 | 61.5 | 62-7 | | 10-03 | @ Florida S. | PK | 51.5 | 7-38 |
|
| 12-06-25 | Duke | 27 | 58.5 | 19 | 44/137 | 19/25/1/196 | 2/0 |
| Virginia | 20 | -3.5 | 25 | 29/128 | 21/40/2/216 | 0/0 |
| 11-15-25 | Virginia | 34 | 60 | 22 | 42/224 | 23/35/2/316 | 1/0 |
| Duke | 17 | -5 | 11 | 23/42 | 18/35/0/213 | 2/1 |
| Duke |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tulane | -9.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 51.5 | -3 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Illinois | 6 | W | 31-27 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Stanford | -10 | W | 35-7 | UN | 51.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | William & Mary | -42.5 | W | 62-7 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 38-7 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Tech | -4.5 | L | 25-28 | OV | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 10-14 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | North Carolina | -3 | L | 20-24 | UN | 47 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:3-3-1 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | NC State | -4 | W | 34-8 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -2.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Norfolk St | -47 | W | 59-3 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 28-3 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | West Virginia | -10.5 | L | 27-38 | OV | 51.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Delaware | -20 | W | 42-3 | UN | 52 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 11.5 | -10.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Florida State | 0 | L | 7-38 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0 | L | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Syracuse | -14 | L | 28-25 | OV | 49 | -2.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7 | L | 7-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ SMU | 10 | PK | 13-23 | UN | 51 | 3.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-23-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Army | 21 | -1 | 29 | -4 | 30 | 36 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 2-2 / 1-1 | 3-1 / 1-1 | +21.8 / +1 | -12 / -2 |
| Tulsa | 31 | 53 | 34(1) | | 34 | 44 | 2-1 / 2-2 | 3-0 / 1-3 | 1-2 / 2-2 | +18.3 / -2.3 | -8.5 / -1.5 |
The road team has won each of the first two meetings since Army joined Tulsa in The American Conference. Tulsa earned a 26-25 upset win as a 9.5-point road 'dog last year. The Golden Hurricane out-gained the Knights by nearly 200 yards in that contest. Each of the prior two meetings have gone over the total. Tulsa returns home after back-to-back road games at Navy (loss) and Rice (win). For all intents and purposes, this will be the Golden Hurricane's third-straight week against a triple-option offense. Rice runs a slightly-different version compared to the service academies, but nonetheless, you're not going to find a team that's better-prepared to defend it than Tulsa right now. Over the last two weeks against the Owls and Midshipmen, Tulsa has allowed a total of nine pass completions. Army hits the road after back-to-back home wins over Tulane and Florida Atlantic. The Knights caught a little bit of a break last week, playing one of the most pass-happy offenses in the country with temperatures below 50-degrees and a stiff breeze at Michie Stadium. Winds rolling down the Hudson River Valley kept Florida Atlantic's passing game in-check, but that wasn't a problem for Army (one completion on the day). As we mentioned, it's rare to catch a service academy in this good of a spot. Tulsa should have a good feel for what to expect after back-to-back games against a run-heavy opponent, and they are getting Army on a high note after back-to-back wins that fell in the Knights' favor.
Play Tulsa
| Army | 35 / 24 | +11 | 29 | 36 | -2.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Tulsa | 36 / 32 | +4 | 35 | 37 | +1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Army | 10-17 | Florida A. | -2 | 55.5 | 56-24 | Tulsa | 10-17 | @ Rice | -3.5 | 46.5 | 38-17 |
| | 10-10 | Tulane | -5.5 | 49 | 20-17 | | 10-10 | @ Navy | +3 | 47.5 | 26-34 |
| | 10-03 | @ Louisiana. | PK | 46.5 | 29-31 | | 10-01 | North Tex. | +3 | 57 | 44-45 |
|
| 11-22-25 | Tulsa | 26 | 44 | 26 | 38/230 | 20/31/0/267 | 2/2 |
| Army | 25 | -10 | 19 | 55/247 | 6/10/1/64 | 0/0 |
| Army |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Bryant | -37 | W | 59-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 31-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | South Florida | -3 | L | 24-28 | OV | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 23 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Temple | -3.5 | W | 21-17 | UN | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | 0 | L | 29-31 | OV | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | L | 7-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Tulane | -5.5 | L | 20-17 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Florida Atlantic | -2 | W | 56-24 | OV | 55.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 35-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tulsa |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Oklahoma State | 12.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 57.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 7 | W | 10-3 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Sam Houston St | -12.5 | L | 23-17 | UN | 51.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | L | 10-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Texas A&M-Commerce | -41 | W | 42-0 | UN | 56.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Arkansas | 7 | L | 6-34 | UN | 51 | 2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | L | 0-16 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-01-26 | North Texas | 3 | W | 44-45 | OV | 57 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Navy | 3 | L | 26-34 | OV | 47.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 20-14 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Rice | -3.5 | W | 38-17 | OV | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 21-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-23-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/20 11:11 pm |
| Air Force | 26 | -7 | 37 | -3 | 35 | 28 | 3-1 / 2-0 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 2-2 / 1-1 | +10.8 / +12 | -8 / -5.5 |
| Wyoming | 17 | 46.5 | 43(3) | | 43 | 50 | 3-0 / 1-3 | 2-1 / 1-3 | 1-2 / 1-3 | +14.3 / -15.3 | -9.5 / +5.5 |
Proving he still has some tricks up his sleeve, long-serving head coach and former Fly Boy himself Troy Calhoun has Air Force punching above its weight once again and hanging around in the Mountain West race after notching a fourth straight win last week when outscoring UNLV. An earlier injury to do-everything QB Liam Szarka has turned out to be something of a non-event for the Falcons as backup Evan Medders has stepped in and performed like a Szarka clone while rushing for 266 yards across the past two weeks vs. Northern Illinois and Dan Mullen’s Rebs. Sure, Air Force is abandoning the forward pass (Medders is just 2-for-4 through the air the past two weeks!), but who needs to throw when the Falcons ran for better than 400 yards each of the last two games to move right on the heels of Army for the nation’s rushing lead? Meanwhile, Jay Sawvel might be saving his job as 4-3 Wyoming can start thinking about a bowl bid, though in truth there is so much flotsam on the Cowboys schedule (including much of the Mountain West) that even local Laramie High might be able to get bowl-eligible playing the likes of Northern Colorado, Northern Illinois and others. True, last week’s 41 points vs. the DeKalb Huskies was a Wyoming high-water mark since November of 2024 for Sawvel, whose own dual-threat QB Tyler Hughes (via William & Mary) did his own Medders/Szarka impersonation last Saturday when running for 183 yards. Let’s not forget, however, that last week’s foe NIU is still winless and enduring a nightmare campaign under an interim head coach, while Hughes and OC Christian Taylor were imported from Williamsburg to also generate a bit more of an aerial threat than Sawvel’s first two Laramie entries. To this point, however, any upgrade in the Cowboy passing game is mostly an illusion as Hughes is stuck on just 3 TD passes (with 7 picks) past the half-mile pole this season, and while Calhoun’s option can be excused for ranking bottom nationally in passing offense, placing a not-much-better 133rd wasn’t in the blueprint for this Wyoming attack. While Air Force has also been much more careful with the ball (+4 TO margin, while the Cowboys at -7 rank tied for 129th), there seem to be a few more ways that Calhoun’s troops can extend this margin. Also don’t forget the Falcons are one team that won’t be bothered by the 7,222-foot elevation at War Memorial Stadium in Laramie since Falcon Stadium sits at 6,621 feet at the foot of Pike's Peak.
Play Air Force
| Air Force | 27.7 / 15.7 | +12 | 36 | 36 | -3 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Wyoming | 19 / 21.3 | -2.3 | 45 | 40 | +4.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Air Force | 10-17 | UNLV | PK | 48.5 | 41-31 | Wyoming | 10-17 | No Illino. | -7.5 | 43 | 41-23 |
| | 10-10 | @ No Illino. | -6.5 | 48.5 | 28-7 | | 10-09 | @ San Jose . | +4 | 42.5 | 16-13 |
| | 10-03 | Navy | -2.5 | 45.5 | 14-9 | | 10-03 | @ North Dak. | +17 | 44 | 0-28 |
|
| 10-18-25 | Wyoming | 21 | 57 | 25 | 36/198 | 23/30/2/211 | 0/0 |
| Air Force | 24 | -3.5 | 19 | 55/331 | 3/8/0/33 | 1/0 |
| Air Force |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Duquesne | -31.5 | W | 34-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 20-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | North Dakota State | 2 | L | 32-38 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 13-28 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Nevada | -4.5 | L | 36-33 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Navy | -2.5 | W | 14-9 | UN | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ No Illinois | -6.5 | W | 28-7 | UN | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | UNLV | 0 | W | 41-31 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | L | 13-17 | OV | 24 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wyoming |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:1-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Colorado State | 2.5 | L | 13-35 | OV | 46 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9 | 0.5 | L | 6-14 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Northern Colorado | -23.5 | L | 21-13 | UN | 44.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 7-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Michigan | -1.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 40 | 0 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 19.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Hawaii | 2 | W | 27-10 | UN | 44 | 0.5 | W | 3-3 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-3 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Dakota State | 17 | L | 0-28 | UN | 44 | 4.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 10 | L | 0-17 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ San Jose State | 4 | W | 16-13 | UN | 42.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 3 | W | 6-7 | UN | 21 |
| 10-17-26 | No Illinois | -7.5 | W | 41-23 | OV | 43 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 7.5 | -4 | W | 20-6 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-23-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| NC State | 37 | -7.5 | 24 | -6.5 | 22 | 19 | 3-1 / 0-2 | 2-2 / 0-2 | 3-1 / 1-1 | +15.5 / -15 | -9.5 / +3.5 |
| Stanford | 23 | 55 | 31.5(1) | | 31 | 55 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 0-3 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +1.3 / -44.3 | -3 / +21.5 |
Perhaps emulating the 1960 Pittsburgh Pirates, who took some frightful beatings from the Yankees but still managed to win the World Series, Stanford has somehow managed three wins this season despite losses in its four other outings being recorded by a whopping 43 points per game (sheesh!). Consensus opinion around the ACC, however, remains that any competent foe ought to be able to take the Cardinal behind the woodshed, with the question in loop circles how much visiting NC State can be trusted in a late-night kickoff in the Bay Area at the same time most of the Wolfpack might be watching Jimmy Fallon on TV at home. Regional sources are starting to suggest that the walls might be starting to close in on long-serving head coach Dave Doeren, whose succession of 6 or 7-win seasons and a variety of minor bowl bids has numbed the support base that still can’t believe how the Wolfpack blew an earlier loss to Vanderbilt and more recently concerned with a second-half collapse at Raleigh vs. Wake Forest in front of last week’s bye. The Pack, however, does pass the basic competency test because spider-like QB CJ Bailey is capable of big play moments such as his career-high 373 passing yards in an upset of Louisville three weeks ago. As long as explosive RB Jayden Scott can return (as hoped) from a foot injury suffered in the win over the Cards on October 3, he balances the offense with his 5.8 yards per carry and reflected further in a 148-yards showcase vs. App State four weeks ago. Meanwhile, note that before last week’s win in Palo Alto vs. FCS Elon, Tavita Pritchard’s offense had managed ten points and gained less than 2 yards per carry combined in blowout losses vs. Wake Forest and Notre Dame, and the defense has been run off of the field by most of the competent offenses it has faced. If the Wolfpack is in the mood to save the job of its coach, the Cardinal is the first step in a favorable schedule the rest of the way that should help Doeren's cause and at least get NC State back to another bowl.
Play NC State
| NC State | 28.7 / 32.3 | -3.7 | 23 | 24 | -1.5 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| Stanford | 14.7 / 40.7 | -26 | 32 | 26 | +7 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| NC State | 10-10 | Wake Fore. | +3.5 | 56 | 14-38 | Stanford | 10-17 | Elon | -34 | 56 | 34-7 |
| | 10-03 | Louisville | +5 | 56.5 | 31-28 | | 10-10 | @ Notre Dame | +40.5 | 55 | 7-58 |
| | 09-26 | Appalachi. | -13 | 56 | 41-31 | | 10-03 | @ Wake Fore. | +14.5 | 54 | 3-57 |
|
| 11-02-24 | Stanford | 28 | 46.5 | 16 | 39/225 | 9/16/1/173 | 2/1 |
| NC State | 59 | -10 | 25 | 40/281 | 19/22/1/246 | 2/0 |
| NC State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:4-1-1 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Virginia | 4 | L | 8-34 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 2.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Richmond | -33.5 | W | 73-0 | OV | 50.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 49-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 3 | L | 31-35 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Appalachian St | -13 | L | 41-31 | OV | 56 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | W | 28-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Louisville | 5 | W | 31-28 | OV | 56.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | W | 13-7 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | Wake Forest | 3.5 | L | 14-38 | UN | 56 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | W | 14-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Stanford |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Hawaii | -4.5 | W | 37-27 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10 | -3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24 |
| 09-04-26 | Miami Florida | 24.5 | L | 6-45 | OV | 46.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | 14 | L | 6-28 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Duke | 10 | L | 7-35 | UN | 51.5 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Georgia Tech | 3 | W | 34-27 | OV | 48 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-20 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | 14.5 | L | 3-57 | OV | 54 | 3.5 | L | 0-15 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 3-29 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Notre Dame | 40.5 | L | 7-58 | OV | 55 | 7.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 23.5 | L | 0-37 | OV | 31 |
| 10-17-26 | Elon | -34 | L | 34-7 | UN | 56 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 10-23-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
October 24th
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/20 9:09 pm |
| West Virginia | 31 | 58.5 | 26.5 | | 27 | 27 | 3-2 / 0-1 | 2-3 / 0-0-1 | 5-0 / 1-0 | +3.4 / -3 | -12.5 / +3 |
| TCU | 34 | -10 | 22(2) | -6.5 | 20 | 20 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 0-2 | +24.3 / +1.5 | -19.5 / 0 |
The trek from Fort Worth to Morgantown is one of the longest in the Big XII, but don't tell either of these teams. The road team has won each of the last four meetings in this series with West Virginia winning at TCU in both 2021 and 2023. The Mountaineers have covered the spread in eight of the last nine meetings in this matchup. Very little separated these teams last year in Morgantown. The Horned Frogs left with a 23-17 win, but you can't get much closer in yards (343-342) and first downs (20-19). We've got two teams on the opposite ends of the totals spectrum. TCU's last four games have all stayed under the total, while all seven of West Virginia's games have gone over the total. The Mountaineers aren't just "going over the total," they are playing a different sport than the rest of the Big XII. Over the last five weeks, West Virginia's games have seen an average of 77.4 points per game. The Mountaineers' defense has allowed 40+ points in four-straight games. With all due respect to Iowa State and Cincinnati, those teams weren't being pegged for high-flying offense at the beginning of the season and they still had no problem hitting that mark against the Mountaineers’ defense. Three of those games that we just listed were all at home, where theoretically, West Virginia’s defense should have some kind of advantage over the opposing offense. TCU's offense has seen its struggles, but from where we sit, nothing will cure your offense faster than a date with West Virginia.
Play the Over
| West Virginia | 39.3 / 46.3 | -7 | 28 | 24 | +1.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| TCU | 13.3 / 14.7 | -1.3 | 20 | 20 | +1.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| West Virginia | 10-17 | Cincinnat. | -1.5 | 64.5 | 45-42 | TCU | 10-17 | @ Baylor | +3.5 | 50.5 | 17-6 |
| | 10-10 | Arizona U | +3.5 | 61.5 | 31-52 | | 10-03 | BYU | +5 | 49 | 10-17 |
| | 10-03 | @ Iowa State | +3 | 53 | 42-45 | | 09-26 | @ Central F. | -3.5 | 48 | 13-21 |
|
| 10-25-25 | TCU | 23 | -16.5 | 19 | 30/107 | 24/39/0/247 | 1/0 |
| West Virginia | 17 | 55 | 19 | 32/41 | 28/41/0/301 | 3/0 |
| West Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:7-0-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Coastal Carolina | -21 | L | 31-24 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Tenn Martin | -41.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 57 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Virginia | 10.5 | W | 38-27 | OV | 51.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma State | -2 | L | 24-41 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13 | -0.5 | W | 14-13 | UN | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa State | 3 | PK | 42-45 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Arizona U | 3.5 | L | 31-52 | OV | 61.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 1.5 | L | 17-24 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Cincinnati U | -1.5 | W | 45-42 | OV | 64.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 0 | L | 14-21 | OV | 31.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| TCU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:0-4-1 |
| 08-29-26 | North Carolina | -7.5 | L | 10-15 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | L | 10-12 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Grambling | -44.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Arkansas St | -19 | W | 31-7 | UN | 56.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Central Florida | -3.5 | L | 13-21 | UN | 48 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2 | L | 10-14 | P | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | BYU | 5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 7-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Baylor | 3.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-6 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/20 10:10 pm |
| Boston College | 21 | 50 | 29 | | 32 | 23 | 3-1 / 0-2 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 1-3 / 0-2 | +3 / -14 | -5 / +14.5 |
| Georgia Tech | 28 | -6.5 | 27(2) | -4 | 24 | 20 | 2-2 / 0-2 | 1-3 / 0-2 | 2-2 / 2-0 | +3.5 / -8.5 | -7 / +3 |
Boston College has covered the number in each of the last four meetings in this ACC matchup, with all four of those games going over the total. Georgia Tech earned a 36-34 road win in Chestnut Hill last season, but the Eagles comfortably stayed within the number as a two-score 'dog. BC has covered the number in each of the last three games, including an outright upset win over Pitt last week. That 27-21 result broke a string of six-straight "under" results in Eagles' games. Georgia Tech has bounced between wins and losses over the last five games as the Yellow Jackets have struggled to find a groove. After upsetting Duke the week prior, Georgia Tech couldn't hang with Virginia Tech last week. We were a little chilly on the outlook of Alberto Mendoza at the beginning of this season, but Fernando's little brother is beginning to turn the corner in his debut season as a college starter. Mendoza went 29-of-38 for 335 yards and two touchdowns last week against the Hokies, and he's developing a nice rhythm with top receiver Jordan Allen. We tend to trust Bill O'Brien and the Eagles a little more than the market during most weeks, so we were a bit surprised at how much value we're showing on Georgia Tech this week. Boston College has played well, but you can poke a hole in almost every game the Eagles have played. That 21-14 loss to Virginia Tech was played in a driving rain storm. They beat Pitt with a back-up QB last week. They beat Rutgers with a back-up QB earlier this season. This looks like a good "sell high" spot on the Eagles, in our opinion.
Play Georgia Tech
| Boston College | 19 / 22.3 | -3.3 | 33 | 19 | +14 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Georgia Tech | 26.3 / 31 | -4.7 | 25 | 24 | +3.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Boston College | 10-17 | Pittsburg. | +6.5 | 42.5 | 27-21 | Georgia Tech | 10-17 | @ Virginia . | +9 | 55 | 24-34 |
| | 10-03 | @ SMU | +21.5 | 55.5 | 16-25 | | 10-10 | Duke | +4.5 | 45.5 | 28-25 |
| | 09-26 | Virginia . | +14.5 | 45.5 | 14-21 | | 09-26 | @ Stanford | -3 | 48 | 27-34 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Georgia Tech | 36 | -16.5 | 30 | 42/257 | 26/34/0/371 | 2/1 |
| Boston College | 34 | 61 | 24 | 26/175 | 26/40/0/362 | 0/0 |
| Boston College |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-1-1 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Cincinnati U | 7 | L | 15-34 | UN | 51.5 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | L | 0-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Rutgers | -3 | W | 28-21 | UN | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Maine | -37.5 | L | 22-16 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 16-0 | OV | | | W | 19-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Virginia Tech | 14.5 | W | 14-21 | UN | 45.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ SMU | 21.5 | W | 16-25 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-6 | OV | 13.5 | 13 | W | 10-13 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Pittsburgh U | 6.5 | W | 27-21 | OV | 42.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-12 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 14-12 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Colorado | -6.5 | L | 13-14 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Tennessee U | 12.5 | L | 24-45 | OV | 55.5 | 3.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 13 | 6.5 | L | 10-24 | OV | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Mercer | -38.5 | L | 44-11 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 24-3 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Stanford | -3 | L | 27-34 | OV | 48 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 20-10 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | Duke | 4.5 | W | 28-25 | OV | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 14-10 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 9 | L | 24-34 | OV | 55 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 6 | L | 3-24 | UN | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/20 11:11 pm |
| Rice | 17 | 55 | 45 | | 45 | 35 | 1-3 / 0-3 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 1-2 | -0.5 / -27.3 | 0 / +22 |
| Florida Atlantic | 38 | -9 | 39(1) | -7 | 37 | 29 | 3-0 / 1-2 | 3-0 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 3-0 | +23.3 / -16.3 | -16 / +5 |
Florida Atlantic earned a 27-21 road win at Rice last season. Each of the last three meetings in this American Conference series have stayed under the total. How do you get people to sit through a three-hour Rice football game? Cheap beer! Florida Atlantic is trying a new promotion this week, decreasing beer prices as the game goes along. If you successfully sit through the first half and intermission, your reward is one-dollar beers during the third quarter until alcohol sales stop at the beginning of the fourth. Rice has gone 0-6 straight-up, 2-4 against the spread since opening the year with a win over FCS-level Houston Christian. The (Houston-based) Owls have gone 8-12 against the spread since the beginning of last season. This game is the step brother to Friday's Army-Tulsa game because Rice played Tulsa last week while Florida Atlantic played Army. We made a strong case for Tulsa in Friday's matchup, and we believe that correlates to a play on the (Boca-based) Owls in this game. As we mentioned, Florida Atlantic was at a steep disadvantage in that contest against Army because of the weather conditions. When you have one team that only wants to run playing a team that only wants to pass, the team that wants to pass can't really afford to have swirling winds and difficult conditions along the Hudson River. While FAU's offense was at a disadvantage in that contest, the Owls' defense got a nice look at defending an option-based rushing attack. So we've got Florida Atlantic with a ticked-off offense paired with a defense that just had to defend 60 rushing attempts the week prior and may have to do so again this week. We trust FAU to handle business in a professional manner.
Play Florida Atlantic
| Rice | 14.3 / 27.3 | -13 | 44 | 32 | +8.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Florida Atlantic | 45 / 27.7 | +17.3 | 36 | 45 | -19 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Rice | 10-17 | Tulsa | +3.5 | 46.5 | 17-38 | Florida Atlantic | 10-17 | @ Army | +2 | 55.5 | 24-56 |
| | 10-10 | @ East Caro. | +10 | 46.5 | 12-28 | | 10-03 | Texas Sou. | -47 | 62.5 | 66-10 |
| | 10-03 | Tex San A. | +11.5 | 56 | 14-16 | | 09-26 | @ UL Monroe | -12 | 58 | 45-17 |
|
| 10-04-25 | Florida Atlantic | 27 | 55 | 20 | 33/103 | 23/33/1/290 | 1/1 |
| Rice | 21 | -4 | 18 | 48/213 | 12/17/0/137 | 0/0 |
| Rice |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-6 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Houston Baptist | -22.5 | W | 31-3 | UN | 47.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Notre Dame | 44.5 | L | 0-52 | UN | 54.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14 | 26.5 | L | 0-42 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Western Michigan | 7.5 | W | 21-28 | OV | 43.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Fresno State | 12 | L | 24-38 | OV | 43 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Tex San Antonio | 11.5 | W | 14-16 | UN | 56 | 3.5 | W | 7-6 | OV | 12.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-16 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | @ East Carolina | 10 | L | 12-28 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Tulsa | 3.5 | L | 17-38 | OV | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 17-21 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida Atlantic |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-2-1 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Florida | 25.5 | L | 21-66 | OV | 59.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | L | 14-38 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Navy | 4.5 | W | 38-30 | OV | 59.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | 3 | W | 31-7 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida Intl | -5 | W | 16-10 | UN | 62.5 | -1.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | PK | 10-7 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ UL Monroe | -12 | W | 45-17 | OV | 58 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | W | 35-17 | OV | 29 |
| 10-03-26 | Texas Southern | -47 | W | 66-10 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 28-3 | OV | | | W | 49-10 | OV | |
| 10-17-26 | @ Army | 2 | L | 24-56 | OV | 55.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 14-35 | OV | 27 |
| 10-24-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Syracuse | 16 | 49.5 | 28 | | 29 | 16 | 1-2 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 2-1 | +17.3 / -5.3 | -8.5 / +6 |
| North Carolina | 31 | -8 | 22.5(2) | -7.5 | 23 | 20 | 1-1 / 2-1 | 1-1 / 2-1 | 1-1 / 1-2 | +10.5 / 0 | -8 / +3 |
North Carolina has covered the spread in each of the last four meetings since this series became a fixture on the ACC rotation. The Tar Heels earned a 27-10 road win at Syracuse last season, holding the Orange to 152 total yards. Bill Belichick is turning things around in Chapel Hill as the Heels have covered the spread in three-straight games. If it hadn't been for a questionably-timed weather delay in Week 3 at Clemson, North Carolina would probably be 5-1 straight-up and against the spread. Syracuse has dropped its last two games against Virginia and Louisville, but the Orange did stay within the spread as a double-digit 'dog in both. When speaking about the status of his four quarterbacks, Syracuse head coach Fran Brown said, "I’m not sure about any of those dudes right now." Third-stringer Malachi Nelson and fourth-stringer Danny Lauter finished last week's game against Louisville. Belichick has built a lengthy career on making the opposing QB's life miserable, and if Coach Brown is struggling to run practices this week, then we don't like Syracuse's outlook in this one. TCU's Jaden Craig was making his FBS debut in the opener and Belichick's defense held him to 5.5 yards per attempt with no touchdowns. Against Clemson freshman Tait Reynolds, North Carolina forced two turnovers and three sacks. Against Pitt back-up Holden Geriner, the Tar Heels allowed 5.0 yards per pass attempt with no touchdowns and two sacks and two interceptions. Unless Syracuse gets some unexpected good news this week, we're expecting a similar result in this one.
Play North Carolina
| Syracuse | 31 / 34.3 | -3.3 | 31 | 25 | +7.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| North Carolina | 23.7 / 24.7 | -1 | 23 | 15 | +9 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Syracuse | 10-17 | Louisville | +14.5 | 57 | 26-34 | North Carolina | 10-17 | @ Duke | +3 | 47 | 24-20 |
| | 10-10 | @ Virginia | +14 | 49 | 25-28 | | 10-10 | @ Pittsburg. | +3.5 | 47.5 | 21-17 |
| | 10-03 | @ Connectic. | -6.5 | 51.5 | 42-41 | | 10-03 | Notre Dame | +21 | 46.5 | 26-37 |
|
| 10-31-25 | North Carolina | 27 | 45.5 | 20 | 43/209 | 15/19/0/216 | 1/1 |
| Syracuse | 10 | -1 | 12 | 32/108 | 4/18/0/39 | 2/1 |
| Syracuse |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | New Hampshire | -35.5 | W | 66-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | California | -4 | L | 18-21 | UN | 57 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 12-7 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-17-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 10.5 | L | 13-27 | UN | 51 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Connecticut | -6.5 | L | 42-41 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-7 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 27-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Virginia | 14 | W | 25-28 | OV | 49 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | W | 17-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Louisville | 14.5 | W | 26-34 | OV | 57 | 3.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | W | 23-28 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ TCU | 7.5 | W | 15-10 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | W | 12-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | East Tennessee State | -36.5 | L | 35-3 | UN | 55 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Clemson | 3 | L | 20-28 | OV | 44.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 7.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-6 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Notre Dame | 21 | W | 26-37 | OV | 46.5 | 5.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 11 | W | 14-21 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 3.5 | W | 21-17 | UN | 47.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Duke | 3 | W | 24-20 | UN | 47 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sacramento State | 20 | 51 | 58 | | 54 | 40 | 1-3 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 0-3 | 1-3 / 2-1 | -9.8 / -28.3 | +2.5 / +11.5 |
| Ball State | 38 | -14.5 | 48(1) | -11 | 48 | 44 | 1-1 / 1-4 | 2-0 / 2-3 | 2-0 / 4-1 | +4.5 / -26.4 | +3.5 / +21.5 |
In last week's edition of The Football GoldSheet, we said, "asking Ohio to win by more than two touchdowns while traveling across the country to California is a huge ask." Boy, were we wrong. Sacramento State has lost its last five games by an average of 33.0 points per game, including a 48-7 home loss to Ohio last week. The Hornets are 0-4 straight-up and against the spread in MAC play, falling short of point spread expectations by an average of 17.0 points per game. Ball State broke its four-game losing skid with a 32-31 road win at Bowling Green. The Cardinals are playing some of their best football of the season, covering the spread in each of the last three games. Dating back to the end of last season, the over is 8-1 in Ball State's last nine games. It's becoming very difficult for both bettors and oddsmakers to price Sacramento State's games this season because the Hornets are simply on a different level than the other 137 teams playing in the FBS division. A case could easily be made that Sacramento State is 7-10 points worse than the second-worst team in the country.
| Sacramento State | 7.7 / 40.3 | -32.7 | 55 | 42 | +11 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Ball State | 23.3 / 38.3 | -15 | 49 | 32 | +20.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Sacramento State | 10-17 | Ohio | +18 | 45.5 | 7-48 | Ball State | 10-17 | @ Bowling G. | +6 | 46.5 | 32-31 |
| | 10-10 | @ Bowling G. | +9 | 43.5 | 10-38 | | 10-10 | @ Northwest. | +34.5 | 53.5 | 14-45 |
| | 09-26 | Massachus. | +6 | 49 | 6-35 | | 10-03 | Toledo | +20.5 | 53 | 24-39 |
| Sacramento State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-6 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:1-6 , PSR:0-6 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 8.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 53 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Miss Valley State | -38.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Fresno State | 17.5 | L | 3-49 | OV | 43.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-32 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Dakota State | 24.5 | W | 10-31 | UN | 50.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 10.5 | 14.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Massachusetts | 6 | L | 6-35 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 6-21 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | 9 | L | 10-38 | OV | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6 | L | 3-17 | UN | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio | 18 | L | 7-48 | OV | 45.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 9.5 | L | 0-27 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ball State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-5 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Ohio State | 50 | L | 3-56 | OV | 55.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 28.5 | W | 3-28 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Stony Brook | -13.5 | W | 41-17 | OV | 52 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Liberty | 14.5 | L | 15-51 | OV | 49.5 | 4.5 | L | 7-13 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 7-23 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kent State | 2.5 | L | 13-26 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 1 | L | 0-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Toledo | 20.5 | W | 24-39 | OV | 53 | 6.5 | W | 7-6 | UN | 13.5 | 10.5 | W | 10-15 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Northwestern | 34.5 | W | 14-45 | OV | 53.5 | 9.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 14-31 | OV | 30 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Bowling Green | 6 | W | 32-31 | OV | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indiana | 20 | -7 | 7.5 | -5 | 6 | 3 | 4-1 / 2-0 | 0-5 / 1-1 | 2-3 / 1-1 | +26.2 / +17.5 | -32 / -17 |
| Michigan | 16 | 43.5 | 15.5(3) | | 13 | 19 | 4-1 / 0-1 | 2-3 / 0-1 | 1-4 / 0-1 | +9 / -6 | -13.5 / -6.5 |
Indiana earned a 20-15 home win over the Wolverines in November 2024, but these teams did not play last season. Neither team hit the 250-yard mark in that 2024 contest as both defenses were up to the task. Indiana's undefeated season was snapped by a (literal) foot last week as star receiver Nick Marsh failed to keep a foot in-bounds on the go-ahead touchdown against Ohio State. That loss dropped the Hoosiers to 1-7 against the spread since last year's National Championship Game against Miami. Michigan salvaged its season with a 21-18 home win over Penn State last week. The Wolverines' have failed to cover the spread over their last three games with all three of those contests staying under the total. Early-week reports out of Ann Arbor suggest that Tommy Carr is going to get the full-time nod at quarterback moving forward. After going 5-for-11 with two interceptions last week against Penn State, Bryce Underwood was sent to the maize-and-blue bench. With Grandpa Lloyd in attendance, Carr went 5-of-7 with a rushing touchdown to push the Wolverines past the Nittany Lions. Whelp, your reward is a date with the defending champs. We're looking at a low total in the low-40s, but it might not be far enough. The Wolverines' last three games have all failed to crack the 40-point mark. Indiana's last two games have failed to crack the 40-point mark. TCU transfer Josh Hoover has provided a steady hand (no interceptions thus far), but at the same time, he's not exactly lighting the scoreboard the way Fernando Mendoza did last year.
Play the Under
| Indiana | 27.3 / 17 | +10.3 | 6 | 16 | -10.5 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Michigan | 18 / 19.3 | -1.3 | 13 | 19 | -5.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Indiana | 10-17 | Ohio State | +2.5 | 49.5 | 15-19 | Michigan | 10-17 | Penn State | -6 | 43 | 21-18 |
| | 10-10 | @ Nebraska | -9 | 48.5 | 20-17 | | 10-03 | @ Minnesota. | -6.5 | 42 | 14-20 |
| | 10-03 | @ Rutgers | -24.5 | 56 | 47-15 | | 09-26 | Iowa | -4.5 | 40 | 19-20 |
|
| 11-09-24 | Michigan | 15 | 47.5 | 16 | 34/69 | 16/32/0/137 | 2/1 |
| Indiana | 20 | -14.5 | 14 | 26/44 | 17/28/1/206 | 1/0 |
| Indiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-4-1 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:0-6-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Texas | -40 | L | 52-16 | OV | 57.5 | -10.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -24 | L | 24-6 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Howard | -58.5 | L | 55-0 | UN | 68 | | W | 20-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Western Kentucky | -44.5 | L | 38-0 | UN | 58 | -13.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 14.5 | -26.5 | L | 14-0 | UN | 34.5 |
| 09-25-26 | Northwestern | -20.5 | L | 29-23 | OV | 49.5 | -6.5 | L | 2-0 | UN | 10.5 | -11.5 | W | 12-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rutgers | -24.5 | W | 47-15 | OV | 56 | -6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | W | 23-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Nebraska | -9 | L | 20-17 | UN | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | -5.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio State | 2.5 | L | 15-19 | UN | 49.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:1-4-1 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Michigan | -27.5 | L | 13-12 | UN | 50.5 | -7 | L | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -16.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Oklahoma | 5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 10-0 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UTEP | -34.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 48.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -20 | L | 17-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Iowa | -4.5 | L | 19-20 | UN | 40 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 7.5 | -2 | W | 10-7 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Minnesota U | -6.5 | L | 14-20 | UN | 42 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 14-7 | P | 21 |
| 10-17-26 | Penn State | -6 | L | 21-18 | UN | 43 | -1.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Western Michigan | 24 | 48.5 | 35 | -1 | 36 | 46 | 2-1 / 3-1 | 2-1 / 1-3 | 2-1 / 1-3 | +13.7 / +4 | -12 / -0 |
| Toledo | 23 | -2.5 | 37(1) | | 36 | 45 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 1-1-1 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +16 / +8.3 | -15.5 / -6 |
Western Michigan has covered the number in each of the last three meetings, including a 14-13 upset win last year as a two-touchdown underdog. Neither team cracked the 300-yard mark in that contest. Both teams are coming off conference wins last week. Western Michigan rebounded nicely from that loss to Boise State with three-straight wins over Buffalo, Kent State and Central Michigan. That shaky performance against the Bulls in the beginning of October didn't look great at the time (nearly lost as a two-touchdown favorite), but Buffalo has won its last two games including a win over...Toledo. The Rockets got back in the win column last week at Eastern Michigan. We have this game lined a little closer to a pick'em, so we are intrigued by the field goal head start with Western Michigan. We mentioned this last week, but Toledo's resume doesn't have much to hang its hat on at the moment. The Rockets had a nice showing against Michigan State in the opener, but Sparty has lost its last five games. That win over San Diego State looked nice at the time, but the Aztecs are now 2-5 against the spread with one of the worst offenses in the country. Beating Temple in overtime looked good at the time, but the Owls have since lost to Charlotte as a three-touchdown favorite, plus additional losses to Army and UConn. Mike Jacobs has done a perfectly-fine job in his first year at the helm, but Toledo's still searching for a signature performance that holds value for longer than a week.
Play Western Michigan
| Western Michigan | 26.3 / 12.7 | +13.7 | 35 | 48 | -11.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Toledo | 27 / 20.3 | +6.7 | 35 | 49 | -15.5 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Western Michigan | 10-17 | @ Central M. | -7.5 | 42.5 | 21-14 | Toledo | 10-17 | @ Eastern M. | -7 | 51.5 | 34-14 |
| | 10-10 | Kent State | -14 | 43.5 | 38-7 | | 10-10 | Buffalo U | -18.5 | 55 | 8-23 |
| | 10-03 | @ Buffalo U | -13 | 46 | 20-17 | | 10-03 | @ Ball State | -20.5 | 53 | 39-24 |
|
| 09-20-25 | Toledo | 13 | -13.5 | 16 | 42/191 | 15/30/2/89 | 1/0 |
| Western Michigan | 14 | 48.5 | 17 | 37/90 | 16/33/1/201 | 3/2 |
| Western Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Michigan | 27.5 | W | 12-13 | UN | 50.5 | 7 | W | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Monmouth | -29.5 | W | 49-14 | OV | 54.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rice | -7.5 | L | 28-21 | OV | 43.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Boise State | 8 | L | 7-32 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-8 | UN | 9.5 | 4.5 | L | 0-15 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Buffalo U | -13 | L | 20-17 | UN | 46 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Kent State | -14 | W | 38-7 | OV | 43.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7 | W | 21-7 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Central Michigan | -7.5 | L | 21-14 | UN | 42.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -4 | W | 14-0 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Toledo |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-4-1 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Michigan State | 10 | PK | 20-30 | OV | 48.5 | 3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 6.5 | L | 7-19 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Central Conn. | -36.5 | W | 63-10 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 14-3 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Temple | -4.5 | L | 49-48 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | L | 14-24 | OV | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | San Diego State | -2.5 | W | 41-16 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Ball State | -20.5 | L | 39-24 | OV | 53 | -6.5 | L | 6-7 | UN | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 15-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Buffalo U | -18.5 | L | 8-23 | UN | 55 | -6.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 0-13 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | -7 | W | 34-14 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 31-7 | OV | 27 |
| 10-24-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Pittsburgh U | 10 | 50.5 | 26 | | 21 | 33 | 4-1 / 1-1 | 3-2 / 1-1 | 1-4 / 2-0 | +23.8 / -2 | -18.5 / -3 |
| Miami Florida | 38 | -20.5 | 4(2) | -24 | 4 | 20 | 3-0 / 3-0 | 2-1 / 2-1 | 3-0 / 2-1 | +42.3 / +26.7 | -40.5 / -19.5 |
Miami is 5-1 straight-up and against the spread in the last six editions of this former Big East rivalry. Miami earned a 38-7 road win at Pitt as a 6.5-point road 'dog last November. The 'Canes out-gained the Panthers by nearly 200 yards in that contest and held a 28-11 advantage in first downs. He flies under the national radar because Pitt hasn't made too many headlines in recent years, but Pat Narduzzi is truly a gift to ACC football media. After complaining that his team wasn't ranked, the Panthers have now lost back-to-back games as a favorite against North Carolina and Boston College. Narduzzi turned to Corey Dailey at quarterback last week against the Eagles after a one-week test with Holden Geriner. Both quarterbacks threw a pair of interceptions in their respective games, so Narduzzi essentially ended up with the same result from both. In an effort to take some of the headlines off his struggling players, Narduzzi took shots at Miami head coach Mario Cristobal this week, suggesting that the 'Canes have "poached" players from Pitt in the past. Narduzzi marches to the best of his own drum, but if Cristobal needed any kind of wake-up call after last week's scare against Florida State, Narduzzi gave him one. We're not looking to penalize Miami too much for last week's result against the Seminoles. That is a rivalry game and Florida State wasn't going to roll over. The Hurricanes were also welcoming back a number of starters to the defense after several missed multiple games due to injury. Cristobal is certainly happy to have them back, but they had a lot of rust to knock off last week against FSU. With an assist from Narduzzi, we expect Miami to handle business in this one. The 'Canes beat a better version of Pitt by 31 last year.
Play Miami
| Pittsburgh U | 24.3 / 27 | -2.7 | 21 | 24 | -3 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Miami Florida | 45.3 / 17 | +28.3 | 5 | 28 | -25 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Pittsburgh U | 10-17 | @ Boston Co. | -6.5 | 42.5 | 21-27 | Miami Florida | 10-17 | Florida S. | -20.5 | 57 | 43-35 |
| | 10-10 | North Car. | -3.5 | 47.5 | 17-21 | | 10-03 | @ Clemson | -14 | 49 | 41-13 |
| | 10-02 | @ Virginia . | +1 | 53 | 35-33 | | 09-26 | Central M. | -41 | 52 | 52-3 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Miami Florida | 38 | -6.5 | 28 | 39/140 | 24/32/1/276 | 0/0 |
| Pittsburgh U | 7 | 49 | 11 | 21/30 | 22/33/1/199 | 2/0 |
| Pittsburgh U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-1-1 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Miami Ohio | -16.5 | W | 59-14 | OV | 48 | -3.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 10 | -9.5 | W | 31-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Central Florida | -7 | L | 12-7 | UN | 55 | -3 | PK | 3-0 | UN | 13 | -4.5 | W | 12-0 | UN | 28 |
| 09-17-26 | Syracuse | -10.5 | W | 27-13 | UN | 51 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Bucknell | -54.5 | W | 59-0 | UN | 63.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 10-02-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 1 | W | 35-33 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 21-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | North Carolina | -3.5 | L | 17-21 | UN | 47.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Boston College | -6.5 | L | 21-27 | OV | 42.5 | -0.5 | W | 12-7 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 12-14 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miami Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-0 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1Q SUR:5-0 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-0 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Stanford | -24.5 | W | 45-6 | OV | 46.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | -14 | W | 28-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-10-26 | Florida A&M | -59.5 | W | 77-7 | OV | 66.5 | -16.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 17.5 | -36.5 | W | 49-0 | OV | 38.5 |
| 09-18-26 | @ Wake Forest | -20 | L | 33-20 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -11 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Central Michigan | -41 | W | 52-3 | OV | 52 | -10.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -24 | W | 35-3 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Clemson | -14 | W | 41-13 | OV | 49 | -3.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Florida State | -20.5 | L | 43-35 | OV | 57 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11.5 | L | 14-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas Tech | 38 | -11 | 12 | -10.5 | 9 | 24 | 4-0 / 2-0 | 2-2 / 1-1 | 3-1 / 1-1 | +22 / +16.5 | -26 / -20 |
| Cincinnati U | 23 | 58 | 24.5(2) | | 26 | 29 | 4-0 / 0-2 | 3-1 / 0-2 | 3-1 / 1-1 | +20 / -15 | -13 / +4.5 |
Texas Tech won the lone meeting 44-41 since Cincinnati joined the Red Raiders in the Big XII. Texas Tech has won-and-covered each of the last three games, slowly showing signs of the team that most expected to see in Lubbock when the year began. J'Koby Williams ran for 165 yards and two touchdowns in last week's win over Arizona State. The Red Raiders also got some good news (for now) that Thomas Castellanos has once-again gained clearance to play. After an on-again-off-again court proceeding, Castellanos was cleared to play last week against the Sun Devils. Starting QB Will Hammond has played well enough to keep the job, but Castellanos provides a dual threat that the Red Raiders can use in special packages when the offense needs a spark. Cincinnati returns home after dropping a pair of road games at Arizona and West Virginia. The Bearcats' defense was on the first for 79 plays against the Mountaineers last week. West Virginia generated 598 total yards and 27 first downs on 7.6 yards per play. Texas Tech is not the team you want to see after a track meet like that. It's gotten lost in the shuffle a little bit, but don't forget that this Cincinnati defense allowed 31 points to Miami (Oh) last month. While almost every other highly-ranked team has suffered an early-season loss, Texas Tech is quietly hiding under the radar. Those back-to-back wins over Oregon State and Houston looked shaky at the time, but with the Beavers and Cougars both rolling over the last month, the Red Raiders' profile looks better than originally anticipated. This might be the last time to catch Texas Tech laying a somewhat-valuable number for a while.
Play Texas Tech
| Texas Tech | 43.7 / 15.3 | +28.3 | 10 | 33 | -21.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Cincinnati U | 26.7 / 35 | -8.3 | 27 | 21 | +5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Texas Tech | 10-17 | Arizona S. | -17 | 50 | 53-25 | Cincinnati U | 10-17 | @ West Virg. | +1.5 | 64.5 | 42-45 |
| | 10-03 | @ Colorado | -13.5 | 50.5 | 29-7 | | 10-03 | @ Arizona U | +7 | 56.5 | 7-34 |
| | 09-26 | Sam Houst. | -34.5 | 55.5 | 49-14 | | 09-26 | Kansas St. | +6 | 55 | 31-26 |
| Texas Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-0 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Abilene Christian | -45 | L | 33-10 | UN | 60.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Oregon State | -26 | L | 35-24 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -14.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-18-26 | Houston U | -8 | L | 28-26 | OV | 52.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 14-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Sam Houston St | -34.5 | W | 49-14 | OV | 55.5 | -7.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 21-14 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Colorado | -13.5 | W | 29-7 | UN | 50.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Arizona State | -17 | W | 53-25 | OV | 50 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 9.5 | -9 | W | 43-10 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Cincinnati U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:1-3-1 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Boston College | -7 | W | 34-15 | UN | 51.5 | -3 | PK | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 10-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Carolina | -36.5 | W | 62-10 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 28-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Miami Ohio | -14.5 | L | 35-31 | OV | 51 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10 | -7.5 | L | 7-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Kansas State | 6 | W | 31-26 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 3.5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona U | 7 | L | 7-34 | UN | 56.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ West Virginia | 1.5 | L | 42-45 | OV | 64.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | 0 | W | 21-14 | OV | 31.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miami Ohio | 19 | -3.5 | 41 | -4 | 36 | 54 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 2-1 | +14.3 / -16 | -13 / +8.5 |
| Central Michigan | 24 | 41 | 46(1) | | 45 | 35 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 1-3 / 1-2 | +8.5 / -32.3 | -4 / +18 |
Miami has won-and-covered each of the last five editions of this MAC series, but the RedHawks and Chippewas did not play last season. Miami out-gained Central Michigan 518-168 in their 2024 clash. The RedHawks are coming off back-to-back wins over UMass and Akron. Miami was able to get past the Zips last week with only 65 passing yards from QB Caleb Heavner. Central Michigan is looking to snap a mini losing skid after dropping back-to-back games against Ohio and Western Michigan. Both of those contests stayed under the total as the Chipps scored 14 points in each game. Central Michigan QB Angel Flores needs to clear concussion protocol this week. Flores was unable to finish last week's 21-14 loss to Western Michigan. Flores ran the ball 31 times for 117 yards against the Broncos last week. Junior back-up Jadyn Glasser does have some starting experience for the Chippewas if his number gets called this week. Even with Flores as a question mark, we're inclined to look in Central Michigan's direction. With all due respect to UMass and Akron, Miami's wins over those two teams aren't moving the needle for us. The last time the RedHawks faced a team that could go toe-to-toe with them in the trenches, they lost outright as a 10.5-point favorite against Bowling Green. The RedHawks may be getting a little too much respect after wins over the Zips and Minutemen.
Play Central Michigan
| Miami Ohio | 24.7 / 19 | +5.7 | 39 | 48 | -8.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Central Michigan | 23 / 23 | 0 | 45 | 43 | +1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Miami Ohio | 10-17 | Akron | -9.5 | 48 | 34-14 | Central Michigan | 10-17 | Western M. | +7.5 | 42.5 | 14-21 |
| | 10-10 | @ Massachus. | -6 | 44.5 | 20-19 | | 10-10 | @ Ohio | +2.5 | 46.5 | 14-31 |
| | 10-03 | Bowling G. | -10 | 41.5 | 20-24 | | 10-03 | Akron | -6.5 | 47.5 | 41-17 |
|
| 10-26-24 | Central Michigan | 7 | 48.5 | 12 | 36/106 | 7/17/1/62 | 0/0 |
| Miami Ohio | 46 | -10.5 | 19 | 39/277 | 15/24/0/241 | 0/0 |
| Miami Ohio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-2-1 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-1-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 16.5 | L | 14-59 | OV | 48 | 3.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 10 | 9.5 | L | 14-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Holy Cross | -30.5 | W | 45-7 | OV | 47 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Cincinnati U | 14.5 | W | 31-35 | OV | 51 | 3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10 | 7.5 | W | 28-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Connecticut | -2.5 | W | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Bowling Green | -10 | L | 20-24 | OV | 41.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 6-10 | UN | 21 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Massachusetts | -6 | L | 20-19 | UN | 44.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | W | 14-10 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Akron | -9.5 | W | 34-14 | P | 48 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -6 | W | 17-7 | P | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Central Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ New Mexico | 11 | L | 7-38 | UN | 47.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Colgate | -18.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 49.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 0-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Wyoming | 1.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 40 | 0 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 19.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Florida | 41 | L | 3-52 | OV | 52 | 10.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 24 | L | 3-35 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Akron | -6.5 | W | 41-17 | OV | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio | 2.5 | L | 14-31 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-31 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Western Michigan | 7.5 | W | 14-21 | UN | 42.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 4 | L | 0-14 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Akron | 19 | 48 | 54.5 | | 52 | 41 | 1-2 / 0-4 | 2-1 / 1-3 | 1-2 / 2-1 | +1.7 / -25 | -3 / +16.5 |
| Kent State | 26 | -3 | 48.5(1) | -7 | 49 | 34 | 2-1 / 0-4 | 3-0 / 0-4 | 1-2 / 3-1 | +10.3 / -42.8 | -3 / +30.5 |
Kent State earned a 42-35 overtime win at Akron last season. The Zips out-gained the Flashes by 156 yards in that contest and held a 33-14 advantage in first downs, but Kent State QB Dru DeShields was fantastic with five touchdowns. Akron is looking to snap a five-game losing skid that includes a 20-point loss at Miami (Oh) last week. Kent State returns home after dropping back-to-back road games at Western Michigan and South Florida. The Flashes' offense has taken some lumps this season, but with the benefit of some context and hindsight, Kent State has played a really tough schedule. Much was made about Western Kentucky scheduling Indiana and Georgia in non-conference play, but Kent State's schedule wasn't much better with road games at South Carolina, Ohio State and South Florida. When given the opportunity against an opponent they can compete with, the Flashes covered the spread against Wofford, Ball State and Ohio. That's a trend that extends back to last season as well. In games with a single-digit spread (either with Kent State favored or the 'dog), Kent State has gone 6-2 against the number. In the MAC, anything can change at the drop of a hat. But by backing Kent State in this contest, we believe we're backing the team with the better quarterback, better defense and don't have to lay more than a field goal in the process.
Play Kent State
| Akron | 18 / 33.3 | -15.3 | 53 | 44 | +7 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Kent State | 6.3 / 26.7 | -20.3 | 49 | 37 | +12.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Akron | 10-17 | @ Miami Ohio | +9.5 | 48 | 14-34 | Kent State | 10-17 | @ South Flo. | +20.5 | 45.5 | 2-29 |
| | 10-10 | Eastern M. | +4.5 | 51.5 | 23-25 | | 10-10 | @ Western M. | +14 | 43.5 | 7-38 |
| | 10-03 | @ Central M. | +6.5 | 47.5 | 17-41 | | 10-03 | Ohio | +3.5 | 50.5 | 10-13 |
|
| 11-11-25 | Kent State | 42 | 49 | 14 | 22/57 | 17/25/0/317 | 4/1 |
| Akron | 35 | -7.5 | 32 | 36/106 | 32/59/1/424 | 3/1 |
| 11-19-24 | Akron | 38 | -10.5 | 28 | 45/279 | 14/30/0/250 | 1/1 |
| Kent State | 17 | 49 | 9 | 28/52 | 12/20/1/229 | 2/0 |
| Akron |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-6 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-3-1 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-2-1 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | 28 | W | 16-38 | OV | 50.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Robert Morris | -26.5 | W | 45-10 | OV | 45.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Minnesota U | 22.5 | L | 7-41 | UN | 48.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | UNLV | 13 | L | 10-38 | UN | 53 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | W | 10-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Central Michigan | 6.5 | L | 17-41 | OV | 47.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Eastern Michigan | 4.5 | W | 23-25 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | W | 14-13 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Miami Ohio | 9.5 | L | 14-34 | P | 48 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 6 | L | 7-17 | P | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kent State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:1-6 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ South Carolina | 35.5 | L | 0-57 | OV | 53 | 9.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 21 | L | 0-29 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wofford | -10 | W | 36-15 | OV | 46 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | L | 14-15 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Ohio State | 52 | L | 3-59 | OV | 58.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14.5 | 31.5 | L | 0-35 | UN | 35.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Ball State | -2.5 | W | 26-13 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1 | W | 17-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio | 3.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Western Michigan | 14 | L | 7-38 | OV | 43.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 7 | L | 7-21 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ South Florida | 20.5 | L | 2-29 | UN | 45.5 | 6.5 | W | 2-0 | UN | 9.5 | 11.5 | W | 2-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Eastern Michigan | 20 | 48.5 | 46.5 | | 45 | 37 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 1-3 | 0-4 / 2-2 | +2.8 / -11.5 | -6.5 / +10.5 |
| Ohio | 27 | -11 | 38(1) | -9.5 | 39 | 56 | 3-0 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 2-2 | 1-2 / 3-1 | +15.7 / +2.8 | -12 / +2.5 |
The MAC typically doesn't catch too many eyeballs before they begin their weeknight slate, but Ohio has quietly shown a lot of improvement in recent weeks. Ohio has won its last four games, and most-importantly, has a full QB room once again. The Bobcats were down to their third-string QB a couple of weeks ago, but Ohio weathered that storm with great success. Starting QB Nick Poulos returned two weeks ago, and he torched Sacramento State last week. Having a team based in California is something new for the whole MAC, so we're not sure how those teams are going to handle cross-country travel. The Bobcats have not had their bye yet and they've played road games in Nebraska, Alabama and California this season. It's fair to question how much Ohio has in the tank, even with last week's easy win over the Hornets. Eastern Michigan QB Noah Kim is questionable this week as he deals with an undisclosed injury. The seventh-year senior has appeared in over 30 games with three different programs during his lengthy college career. Brogan McCaughey and Jace Stuckey both made a relief appearance last week against Toledo as the Eagles fell 34-14 at home. Kim went 16-of-36 against the Rockets' defense and Toledo finished that game with six sacks. We certainly wish that Kim was fully-healthy, but we can only look in EMU's direction with a double-digit spread. The Eagles covered the number as a double-digit 'dog in last year's meeting with Ohio.
Play Eastern Michigan
10/19 2:21 PM PDT — Eastern Michigan QB Noah Kim is questionable this week as he deals with an undisclosed injury. The seventh-year senior has appeared in over 30 games with three different programs during his lengthy college career. Kim went 16-of-36 against Toledo last week as the Rockets' defense finished that game with six sacks.
| Eastern Michigan | 25.7 / 23.7 | +2 | 45 | 44 | +2.5 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Ohio | 30.7 / 10.3 | +20.3 | 40 | 50 | -8 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Eastern Michigan | 10-17 | Toledo | +7 | 51.5 | 14-34 | Ohio | 10-17 | @ Sacrament. | -18 | 45.5 | 48-7 |
| | 10-10 | @ Akron | -4.5 | 51.5 | 25-23 | | 10-10 | Central M. | -2.5 | 46.5 | 31-14 |
| | 10-03 | @ Massachus. | +5.5 | 48.5 | 38-14 | | 10-03 | @ Kent State | -3.5 | 50.5 | 13-10 |
|
| 10-25-25 | Ohio | 28 | -12.5 | 25 | 45/172 | 23/29/2/315 | 0/0 |
| Eastern Michigan | 21 | 60.5 | 17 | 25/112 | 21/30/0/259 | 1/1 |
| 11-13-24 | Eastern Michigan | 10 | 52 | 15 | 34/111 | 18/30/3/155 | 2/1 |
| Ohio | 35 | -10.5 | 20 | 31/157 | 22/32/1/277 | 0/0 |
| Eastern Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Sacramento State | -8.5 | W | 28-17 | UN | 53 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-04-26 | San Jose State | -1 | L | 21-27 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 0 | L | 7-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Michigan State | 17.5 | L | 7-35 | UN | 49.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 26 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Wisconsin | 23.5 | L | 10-54 | OV | 44 | 6.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Lindenwood | -24 | W | 29-3 | UN | 53 | | W | 13-0 | OV | | | W | 19-0 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Massachusetts | 5.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Akron | -4.5 | L | 25-23 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | L | 13-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Toledo | 7 | L | 14-34 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | L | 7-31 | OV | 27 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ohio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Nebraska | 23.5 | L | 21-49 | OV | 47.5 | 7 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10 | 13.5 | W | 13-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Jacksonville St | -1.5 | W | 29-27 | OV | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10 | -0.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ South Alabama | 7 | W | 36-41 | OV | 49.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Stonehill | -32 | L | 35-7 | UN | 53.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Kent State | -3.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Central Michigan | -2.5 | W | 31-14 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 31-0 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Sacramento State | -18 | W | 48-7 | OV | 45.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -9.5 | W | 27-0 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| BYU | 31 | -7.5 | 15 | -7.5 | 14 | 2 | 4-0 / 2-0 | 4-0 / 2-0 | 2-2 / 1-1 | +21.3 / +12.5 | -14.5 / -11.5 |
| Central Florida | 24 | 44 | 25.5(3) | | 27 | 22 | 3-0 / 0-3 | 2-1 / 1-1-1 | 2-1 / 1-2 | +29.7 / -9.7 | -19 / +9 |
BYU has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings, including a 41-21 home win over the Knights last season. Each of the last four meetings between these teams have gone over the total. It's going to be impossible to read analysis or listen to a breakdown of this game and not see the words, "the spot." BYU has won-and-covered every game this season, including an outright upset win over Notre Dame last week. Those that like to look for situational spots on the college football calendar have had this one circled for months. Win or lose against Notre Dame, bettors were going to line up to take UCF in this spot after the late night in Provo followed by the cross-country travel to Orlando. "The spot" says BYU is in for a rough trip to central Florida, but oddsmakers certainly aren't going to give you a bargain deal. From a power ratings' perspective, we have this game lined closer to double digits. When UCF traveled to Provo last year, the Knights closed as a 17.5-point 'dog. BYU is 6-0 against the spread this season, so it's pretty hard to make an argument that the Cougars have regressed from that contest. UCF actually jumped out to a 14-0 lead in that game before getting out-scored 41-7 over the final three quarters. Can you say that UCF has improved since then? Knights’ head coach Scott Frost probably wishes he had a little more clarity at the QB position heading into this matchup. Alonza Barnett has not played since Week 2 as he recovers from a hamstring injury, and even though the Knights are coming off a bye, Barnett remains a question mark. Florida International transfer Keyone Jenkins will remain the starter as Barnett tries to make a late-week push to be the back-up. Even though we are tempted to lay the discounted price with BYU, we'll look to ride that "over" train that has been productive when these teams take the field. Bear Bachmeier went 21-of-25 for 289 yards and a touchdown against the Knights last season.
Play the Over
10/20 2:22 PM PDT — UCF head coach Scott Frost probably wishes he had a little more clarity at the QB position heading into this matchup. Alonza Barnett has not played since Week 2 as he recovers from a hamstring injury, and even though the Knights are coming off a bye, Barnett remains a question mark. Florida International transfer Keyone Jenkins will remain the starter as Barnett tries to make a late-week push to be the back-up.
| BYU | 23 / 14.7 | +8.3 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Central Florida | 22 / 27.3 | -5.3 | 27 | 19 | +8 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| BYU | 10-17 | Notre Dame | +10.5 | 47.5 | 28-24 | Central Florida | 10-10 | @ Oklahoma . | +10 | 53.5 | 28-42 |
| | 10-09 | Iowa State | -11.5 | 46.5 | 24-10 | | 10-03 | @ Houston U | +10 | 50 | 17-27 |
| | 10-03 | @ TCU | -5 | 49 | 17-10 | | 09-26 | TCU | +3.5 | 48 | 21-13 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Central Florida | 21 | 46.5 | 15 | 19/42 | 24/41/1/254 | 1/1 |
| BYU | 41 | -17.5 | 21 | 40/118 | 21/25/0/289 | 1/0 |
| 10-26-24 | BYU | 37 | 53.5 | 29 | 51/252 | 16/24/0/228 | 2/1 |
| Central Florida | 24 | -2.5 | 18 | 29/181 | 14/27/2/198 | 1/0 |
| BYU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-0 , PSR:6-0 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Dixie State | -50.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona U | -6.5 | W | 28-17 | UN | 48.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Colorado State | -17.5 | W | 41-23 | OV | 55 | -4.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 11.5 | -9.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ TCU | -5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 7-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-09-26 | Iowa State | -11.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7 | W | 14-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Notre Dame | 10.5 | W | 28-24 | OV | 47.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Central Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-2-1 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:5-0-1 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-2-1 |
| 09-03-26 | Bethune Cookman | -43.5 | W | 73-6 | OV | 58.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 38-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 7 | W | 7-12 | UN | 55 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 13 | 4.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia State | -17.5 | L | 44-30 | OV | 50.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 20-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | TCU | 3.5 | W | 21-13 | UN | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2 | W | 14-10 | P | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Houston U | 10 | PK | 17-27 | UN | 50 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma State | 10 | L | 28-42 | OV | 53.5 | 2.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bowling Green | 23 | 44.5 | 47 | | 46 | 49 | 1-3 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 3-0 | +3 / -31 | +0.5 / +21 |
| Buffalo U | 19 | -3 | 47(1) | -1 | 47 | 49 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 2-1 | +2.8 / -13.3 | -10 / +22 |
The road team has won each of the last five installments of this MAC matchup. Bowling Green earned a 24-14 road win at Buffalo in 2023, and the Bulls returned the favor with a win in Ohio last season. Each of the last three meetings have stayed under the total. Neither team has hit the 300-yard mark in either of the last two meetings. Our thoughts on this game are very similar to our thoughts on Central Michigan vs Miami (Oh). Unless your name is Toledo (on the good side) or Sacramento State (on the bad side), there's not much separating the other teams in this league. We have this game lined closer to a pick'em, so a 3.5-point head start with Bowling Green has our attention. Home field advantage clearly hasn't meant much in this series, so there's no real need to bump the Bulls for that. Bowling Green has played the tougher schedule between these squads. The Falcons' last two losses have come by one score, so they're not getting blown out. The last three meetings between Buffalo and Bowling Green have featured a closing spread below a field goal, and we believe that should probably be the case once again on Saturday.
Play Bowling Green
| Bowling Green | 31 / 20.7 | +10.3 | 45 | 47 | -1.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Buffalo U | 21.7 / 15.3 | +6.3 | 50 | 39 | +8.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Bowling Green | 10-17 | Ball State | -6 | 46.5 | 31-32 | Buffalo U | 10-17 | Massachus. | -6 | 43.5 | 25-18 |
| | 10-10 | Sacrament. | -9 | 43.5 | 38-10 | | 10-10 | @ Toledo | +18.5 | 55 | 23-8 |
| | 10-03 | @ Miami Ohio | +10 | 41.5 | 24-20 | | 10-03 | Western M. | +13 | 46 | 17-20 |
|
| 11-01-25 | Buffalo U | 28 | 44 | 10 | 27/146 | 13/24/1/136 | 0/0 |
| Bowling Green | 3 | -2.5 | 15 | 44/116 | 11/28/1/100 | 2/1 |
| Bowling Green |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tarleton State | -1.5 | L | 13-20 | UN | 49.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | L | 7-17 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Nebraska | 31 | L | 7-56 | OV | 49 | 7 | L | 0-14 | OV | 11.5 | 17.5 | L | 0-35 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Iowa State | 22.5 | L | 7-55 | OV | 43.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | L | 7-35 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Florida | 17.5 | W | 6-14 | UN | 49 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 9.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Miami Ohio | 10 | W | 24-20 | OV | 41.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-6 | UN | 21 |
| 10-10-26 | Sacramento State | -9 | W | 38-10 | OV | 43.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -6 | W | 17-3 | UN | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Ball State | -6 | L | 31-32 | OV | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Buffalo U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:5-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Albany | -18.5 | L | 21-17 | UN | 47.5 | 0 | L | 0-7 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 14-10 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Florida Intl | 8 | L | 20-33 | OV | 47.5 | 3 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10 | 5.5 | L | 6-21 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Penn State | 40 | L | 13-55 | OV | 48.5 | 10.5 | L | 3-17 | OV | 13.5 | 24 | L | 6-34 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | Robert Morris | -28 | L | 31-28 | OV | 46.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | 14-14 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Western Michigan | 13 | W | 17-20 | UN | 46 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 7.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Toledo | 18.5 | W | 23-8 | UN | 55 | 6.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 13.5 | 10.5 | W | 13-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Massachusetts | -6 | W | 25-18 | UN | 43.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 7.5 | -4 | L | 8-15 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tennessee U | 20 | 50.5 | 12.5 | | 12 | 5 | 4-1 / 2-0 | 3-2 / 1-1 | 0-5 / 1-1 | +20.6 / +14 | -15.5 / -13 |
| South Carolina | 23 | -2.5 | 15(3) | -0.5 | 17 | 10 | 2-2 / 1-1 | 1-3 / 1-1 | 3-1 / 1-1 | +21.3 / -6 | -21.5 / +11 |
Tennessee is 4-1 straight-up and against the spread since 2019, but South Carolina's 63-38 win as a 21.5-point underdog in 2022 is the one that everyone in Knoxville remembers. Upsets in college football happen all the time. Upsets as a three-touchdown underdog are rare, but they do happen. Upsets where a three-touchdown underdog scores 63 points, generates over 600 yards and wins by 25...well, those raise an eyebrow. And plenty of eyebrows were raised. That was such an outlier performance that former Michigan staffer Connor Stalions was rumored to be helping the Gamecocks in that contest. Tennessee was ranked No. 5 at the time and that loss eliminated the Vols from the College Football Playoff. As he entered Tennessee's facility on Monday morning, Vols' head coach Josh Heupel carried a picture of South Carolina fans storming the field after that game. Needless to say, we're in for a good one on Saturday in Columbia. Each of the last five editions in this series have gone over the total. South Carolina is coming off its bye week after previously upsetting Florida the week before. The over is 4-1 in South Carolina's games against FBS-level foes, with that contest against the Gators falling just short of the total. Tennessee has rebounded nicely after the loss to Texas with three-straight wins over Auburn, Arkansas and Alabama. New defensive coordinator Jim Knowles has put on a clinic this season, holding the last five opponents to an average of 14.0 points per game. We respect the turnaround that South Carolina has performed on offense over the past few weeks, but Tennessee's defense is simply operating at an elite level right now. If you can hold Alabama's offense to 201 total yards and 12 first downs, then you can probably land in that neighborhood against the Gamecocks.
Play the Under
| Tennessee U | 24.7 / 13.7 | +11 | 12 | 15 | -4 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| South Carolina | 30 / 34.3 | -4.3 | 19 | 12 | +6.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Tennessee U | 10-17 | Alabama | +7.5 | 50 | 26-10 | South Carolina | 10-10 | @ Florida | +10 | 59.5 | 38-19 |
| | 10-10 | @ Arkansas | -13.5 | 51 | 24-17 | | 10-03 | Kentucky | -2.5 | 53 | 34-35 |
| | 10-03 | Auburn | -6 | 54 | 24-14 | | 09-26 | @ Alabama | +11.5 | 53 | 18-49 |
| Tennessee U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:2-3-1 , O/U:1-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Furman | -49.5 | L | 56-9 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Georgia Tech | -12.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 55.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13 | -6.5 | W | 24-10 | OV | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Kennesaw State | -35 | L | 42-9 | UN | 60 | -9.5 | W | 15-3 | OV | 14.5 | -21.5 | L | 21-3 | UN | 34 |
| 09-26-26 | Texas | 5 | W | 17-20 | UN | 54.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | L | 3-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Auburn | -6 | W | 24-14 | UN | 54 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Arkansas | -13.5 | L | 24-17 | UN | 51 | -2.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | PK | 7-0 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Alabama | 7.5 | W | 26-10 | UN | 50 | 2.5 | W | 9-0 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 12-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Kent State | -35.5 | W | 57-0 | OV | 53 | -9.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21 | W | 29-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Towson | -44.5 | L | 45-9 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Mississippi St | -3.5 | L | 34-41 | OV | 60 | -0.5 | W | 13-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 23-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Alabama | 11.5 | L | 18-49 | OV | 53 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | L | 10-35 | OV | 27 |
| 10-03-26 | Kentucky | -2.5 | L | 34-35 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Florida | 10 | W | 38-19 | UN | 59.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | W | 17-10 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rutgers | 27 | 58.5 | 29 | | 29 | 27 | 1-3 / 1-1 | 2-2 / 1-1 | 4-0 / 1-1 | -1 / 0 | -6.5 / +4.5 |
| Northwestern | 34 | -15 | 18(2) | -13 | 20 | 26 | 4-0 / 1-1 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 2-0 / 1-1 | +25.5 / -1.5 | -12.5 / +7 |
This will be the first meeting between the Scarlet Knights and Wildcats since Rutgers' 24-7 home win in September 2023. All three prior meetings have stayed under the total. Northwestern is off to a 5-1 start following last week's road win at Michigan State. Rutgers also found the win column with a 37-30 upset win at Maryland. The over is 5-1 in Rutgers' games thus far, and that is the direction that we will look in this one. Knights' QB Dylan Lonergan missed some time earlier this season due to injury, but he's lit a spark under Rutgers' offense in recent weeks. He threw for 291 yards and three touchdowns in last week's win over the Terps. After opening the year with three interceptions against UMass, Lonergan has only thrown one interception across his last three games. Northwestern's offense probably wants to run at a faster pace than it currently is, and Rutgers looks like the right dance partner for the Purple 'Cats. Northwestern's last four opponents have been Indiana, Penn State, Ball State and Michigan State. None of those teams are looking for a shootout. Rutgers will accept that challenge with open arms. Fixing the defense has seemingly become a lost cause for Greg Schiano, so the Knights' best path to success on a weekly basis is through a high-scoring affair. Keep an eye on the weather because we're approaching late-October in Evanston, but if conditions are clear, we're expecting to see points.
Play the Over
| Rutgers | 36.7 / 28 | +8.7 | 30 | 29 | -4 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Northwestern | 34.3 / 16 | +18.3 | 19 | 30 | -13 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Rutgers | 10-17 | @ Maryland | +5.5 | 56 | 37-30 | Northwestern | 10-17 | @ Michigan . | -7 | 50 | 24-21 |
| | 10-03 | Indiana | +24.5 | 56 | 15-47 | | 10-10 | Ball State | -34.5 | 53.5 | 45-14 |
| | 09-25 | Howard | -42 | 57 | 58-7 | | 10-02 | Penn State | +3 | 47 | 34-13 |
| Rutgers |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-5 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Massachusetts | -29.5 | L | 21-37 | OV | 55 | -7.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -17.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-11-26 | @ Boston College | 3 | L | 21-28 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | USC | 21 | W | 35-42 | OV | 58.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | 13.5 | W | 14-20 | OV | 31 |
| 09-25-26 | Howard | -42 | W | 58-7 | OV | 57 | | W | 21-7 | OV | | | W | 41-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Indiana | 24.5 | L | 15-47 | OV | 56 | 6.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | L | 0-23 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Maryland | 5.5 | W | 37-30 | OV | 56 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 3 | L | 13-23 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Northwestern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-1-2 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | South Dakota St | -14 | W | 34-18 | OV | 49.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 10-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Colorado | -3.5 | W | 41-7 | P | 48 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 21-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Indiana | 20.5 | W | 23-29 | OV | 49.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-2 | UN | 10.5 | 11.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Penn State | 3 | W | 34-13 | P | 47 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 23 |
| 10-10-26 | Ball State | -34.5 | L | 45-14 | OV | 53.5 | -9.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 31-14 | OV | 30 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan State | -7 | L | 24-21 | UN | 50 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | L | 10-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UL Monroe | 13 | 51.5 | 51 | | 50 | 37 | 0-3 / 0-3 | 0-3 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 2-1 | -18.3 / -24 | +5.5 / +17 |
| Troy | 31 | -13 | 42(1) | -10 | 39 | 36 | 3-0 / 0-3 | 1-2 / 1-2 | 1-2 / 0-3 | +13.7 / -16 | -16 / +11 |
The road team has won-and-covered each of the last three editions of this Sun Belt matchup. Troy earned a 37-14 road win at Monroe last season, although the WarHawks did out-gain the Trojans in that contest. Troy QB Goose Crowder is listed as questionable this week as he recovers from a shoulder injury that knocked him out of last week's loss to Louisiana. Crowder threw for 200+ yards in each of the Trojans' previous four games and he scored four touchdowns two weeks ago against Southern Miss. Dating back to the end of last season, the under is 11-1 in Troy's last 12 games. Monroe is looking to snap a 14-game losing skid. The WarHawks are 1-5 against the spread this season and were shut-out last week against Louisiana Tech. If Crowder is unable to go for the Trojans, back-up Tucker Kilcrease has seen plenty of action for Troy over the last three years.
10/19 2:23 PM PDT — Troy QB Goose Crowder is listed as questionable this week as he recovers from a shoulder injury that knocked him out of last week's loss to Louisiana. Crowder threw for 200+ yards in each of the Trojans' previous four games and he scored four touchdowns two weeks ago against Southern Miss.
| UL Monroe | 17.3 / 40.3 | -23 | 51 | 38 | +13 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Troy | 23.7 / 29.3 | -5.7 | 38 | 41 | -1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| UL Monroe | 10-17 | Louisiana. | +13.5 | 56 | 0-24 | Troy | 10-17 | @ Louisiana | +3 | 49.5 | 6-33 |
| | 10-03 | @ South Ala. | +13 | 56.5 | 35-52 | | 10-06 | So Missis. | -9.5 | 51.5 | 55-34 |
| | 09-26 | Florida A. | +12 | 58 | 17-45 | | 09-26 | @ Utah State | +3 | 48 | 10-21 |
|
| 10-18-25 | Troy | 37 | -4.5 | 13 | 31/92 | 13/21/0/223 | 1/0 |
| UL Monroe | 14 | 46.5 | 20 | 29/98 | 23/41/2/228 | 2/2 |
| UL Monroe |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-6 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-1-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Mississippi St | 28.5 | L | 13-62 | OV | 54.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 13.5 | 17 | L | 3-41 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ UAB | 9 | W | 20-26 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13 | 6 | W | 17-10 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | SE Louisiana | -9.5 | L | 35-38 | OV | 48.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | L | 13-24 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Florida Atlantic | 12 | L | 17-45 | OV | 58 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | L | 17-35 | OV | 29 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Alabama | 13 | L | 35-52 | OV | 56.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | L | 14-31 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Louisiana Tech | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 56 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 29 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Troy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Sam Houston St | -15.5 | L | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama St | -23.5 | L | 34-17 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri | 26.5 | W | 17-27 | UN | 49.5 | 7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 15 | W | 17-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Utah State | 3 | L | 10-21 | UN | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-06-26 | So Mississippi | -9.5 | W | 55-34 | OV | 51.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Louisiana | 3 | L | 6-33 | UN | 49.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-19 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia State | 23 | -2.5 | 42 | | 46 | 26 | 3-0 / 1-2 | 3-0 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 2-1 | +34 / -9 | -12.5 / +11 |
| Arkansas St | 27 | 58.5 | 38.5(1) | -4.5 | 39 | 48 | 2-1 / 1-3 | 1-2 / 2-2 | 2-1 / 1-3 | +13.7 / -8.8 | -13.5 / +7.5 |
The RedWolves and Panthers have only met one time over the past five seasons - Arkansas State's 27-20 road win in November 2024. For what it's worth, the Panthers out-gained the RedWolves by 53 yards in that contest. Georgia State's six-game winning streak at the betting window came to a close last week as the Panthers were crushed by James Madison. JMU led 35-10 at halftime as the Dukes' defense held Georgia State QB Cameran Brown to 5.4 yards per pass attempt. Arkansas State found the win column with a 23-13 road win at Southern Miss last week. Four of the RedWolves' last five games have stayed under the total. Georgia State entered this season with a win total projection of 3.5, which the Panthers cleared by Week 5. We don't want to take anything away from what Georgia State has accomplished this season, but the fact remains they lost by 14 and 27 in their two toughest games thus far. Per Sagarin, Georgia State's strength of schedule ranks No. 122. Arkansas State has played the tougher schedule and has largely played up to expectation thus far. We believe the wrong team is favored in this matchup.
Play Arkansas State
| Georgia State | 33 / 24.3 | +8.7 | 44 | 38 | -0.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Arkansas St | 30.7 / 30.7 | 0 | 39 | 42 | -1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Georgia State | 10-17 | @ James Mad. | +8 | 58 | 22-49 | Arkansas St | 10-17 | @ So Missis. | -5.5 | 61 | 23-13 |
| | 10-03 | Old Domin. | -1 | 51.5 | 42-10 | | 10-08 | South Ala. | -3 | 60.5 | 49-56 |
| | 09-26 | No Illino. | -8.5 | 56.5 | 35-14 | | 10-03 | @ Louisiana | +5 | 49 | 20-23 |
|
| 11-16-24 | Arkansas St | 27 | 60 | 20 | 46/265 | 10/17/0/97 | 0/0 |
| Georgia State | 20 | -2.5 | 23 | 23/65 | 26/49/2/346 | 3/0 |
| Georgia State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | N. Carolina A&T | -28.5 | W | 59-10 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kennesaw State | 7.5 | W | 31-17 | UN | 55.5 | 2.5 | W | 6-3 | UN | 12.5 | 4.5 | W | 21-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Florida | 17.5 | W | 30-44 | OV | 50.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 24-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | No Illinois | -8.5 | W | 35-14 | UN | 56.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Old Dominion | -1 | W | 42-10 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ James Madison | 8 | L | 22-49 | OV | 58 | 3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 6 | L | 10-35 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Memphis | 10.5 | L | 24-42 | OV | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-21 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -31.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 56.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ TCU | 19 | L | 7-31 | UN | 56.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 10.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Kennesaw State | -6.5 | L | 17-14 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana | 5 | W | 20-23 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 10-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-08-26 | South Alabama | -3 | L | 49-56 | OV | 60.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | -1.5 | L | 28-34 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ So Mississippi | -5.5 | W | 23-13 | UN | 61 | -0.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | W | 16-7 | UN | 31 |
| 10-24-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| USC | 24 | -2 | 14 | -1 | 12 | 18 | 4-1 / 2-0 | 1-4 / 1-1 | 3-2 / 1-1 | +12.8 / +7.5 | -18.5 / -10.5 |
| Wisconsin | 27 | 50.5 | 18(3) | | 19 | 22 | 3-0 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 0-1 | +33 / -3 | -25 / +5.5 |
The last time USC trekked to Camp Randall, it was September of 1965, when Mike Garrett (en route to his Heisman Trophy) wrecked the Badgers with 154 rushing yards in a comfy 26-6 cruise for John McKay’s Trojans over a subpar Wisconsin side that would win only twice all of that season. No Heisman contenders (sorry, Jayden Maiava) on the field this Saturday in Madison, with focus more on a couple of hot-seat coaches looking to avoid trouble. Of those, it’s Luke Fickell now looking over his shoulder a little more warily after his Wisconsin went flat against UCLA and its backup QB last week, and with native sons like Wake Forest's Jake Dickert and New Mexico's Jason Eck generating a lot of buzz in the Badger booster class. This week might work better for Fickell, however, as the Trojans have taken advantage of some recent schedule breaks (namely October victims Washington and Penn State having disappointed) and in recent years have had their problems on the Big Ten trail, as the narrow win over vs. the Nittany Lions in Happy Valley two weeks was also USC’s first spread cover on the conference road outside of LA County since joining the loop in 2024. Springing earlier leaks on the stop end vs. foes like Louisiana and Rutgers, not to mention letting Oregon and backup QB Dylan Railola burn them for 41 points on September 26 (the Ducks have only managed 32 points total in two games since), Gary Patterson's defense is likely to allow Wisconsin to do some business now that top RB and Iowa State transfer Abu Sama III (6.6 yards per carry) is back to active duty, while mobile QBs like Fickell’s Old Dominion transfer Colton Joseph have given Riley’s USC fits in the past. Meanwhile, a rather robust Badger defense (ranks 17th nationally at 287 yards per game) has a chance to turn the Trojans one-dimensional and expose Maiava’s career-long penchant for crucial errors when Riley can’t properly balance his offense. Either way, the rumor mill will continue to spin after this result!
Play Wisconsin
10/19 2:24 PM PDT — USC tight end Mark Bowman is expected to return this week after missing the previous two games against Washington and Penn State.
| USC | 27.7 / 28.3 | -0.7 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Wisconsin | 20.7 / 13.3 | +7.3 | 19 | 19 | +0.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| USC | 10-10 | @ Penn State | PK | 54.5 | 31-23 | Wisconsin | 10-17 | @ UCLA | +1 | 43 | 7-17 |
| | 10-03 | Washingto. | -7 | 57 | 25-21 | | 10-03 | Michigan . | -8.5 | 43.5 | 31-3 |
| | 09-26 | Oregon | +3.5 | 60.5 | 27-41 | | 09-26 | @ Penn State | +9.5 | 44 | 24-20 |
| USC |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:0-5-1 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | San Jose State | -37 | L | 42-26 | OV | 61 | -10 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14 | -23.5 | W | 28-0 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | Fresno State | -22.5 | W | 39-0 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | PK | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 30-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Louisiana | -30.5 | L | 49-30 | OV | 59 | -7.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rutgers | -21 | L | 42-35 | OV | 58.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | L | 20-14 | OV | 31 |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon | 3.5 | L | 27-41 | OV | 60.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-13 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Washington U | -7 | L | 25-21 | UN | 57 | -2.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | -4 | L | 10-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Penn State | 0 | W | 31-23 | UN | 54.5 | 0 | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | 17-17 | OV | 27 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wisconsin |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-3-1 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Notre Dame | 21.5 | L | 13-41 | OV | 46 | 6.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Illinois | -43 | L | 36-9 | UN | 53 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 23-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Eastern Michigan | -23.5 | W | 54-10 | OV | 44 | -6.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Penn State | 9.5 | W | 24-20 | P | 44 | 2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 6 | L | 7-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan State | -8.5 | W | 31-3 | UN | 43.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -6 | W | 17-3 | UN | 22 |
| 10-17-26 | @ UCLA | 1 | L | 7-17 | UN | 43 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | 0 | L | 0-10 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Baylor | 27 | 54.5 | 23.5 | | 21 | 21 | 3-1 / 1-0 | 2-2 / 1-0 | 1-3 / 1-0 | +14.3 / +36 | -17.5 / +3 |
| Kansas | 31 | -1 | 22.5(2) | -3 | 24 | 19 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 2-0 / 2-0 | +27.7 / -14 | -20.5 / +9.5 |
Baylor has won each of the last 14 meetings in this Big XII series, with ten-straight point spread covers. The Bears and Jayhawks did not play last season. The last meeting in 2024 featured 1,094 total yards, yet still stayed under the closing total of 62.5. Both teams are licking their wounds after tough losses last week. Kansas has dropped back-to-back games against Utah and Kansas State, while Baylor's four-game winning streak was snapped against TCU. That was a really curious no-show by the Bears last week. Baylor was coming off its bye week with extra time to prep and failed to find the end zone against TCU. Also, the Bears' 55-19 road win at Arizona State lost a little shine after the Sun Devils suffered their third 28+ point loss of the season last week against Texas Tech. The Jayhawks' last three games have all gone over the total. Kansas held a 17-7 lead against K-State last week before the Wildcats ended that game on a 28-7 run. Dynamic QB Isaiah Marshall led the Jayhawks in rushing with 117 yards on 14 carries. Kansas has played fairly well in recent weeks, but they've struggled to put 60-minute efforts together. Prior to that win over Arizona State three weeks ago, the Bears had lost their last five road games. After last week's display against the Horned Frogs, we need to see a little more from the Bears before they can be trusted. Kansas or pass, in our opinion.
| Baylor | 28 / 16.3 | +11.7 | 21 | 23 | -3 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Kansas | 34.3 / 25.3 | +9 | 24 | 26 | -1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Baylor | 10-17 | TCU | -3.5 | 50.5 | 6-17 | Kansas | 10-17 | @ Kansas St. | +3 | 55 | 24-35 |
| | 10-03 | @ Arizona S. | +3 | 49.5 | 55-19 | | 10-10 | @ Utah | +15.5 | 49.5 | 24-41 |
| | 09-26 | Colorado | -8 | 54.5 | 23-13 | | 10-03 | Middle Te. | -21.5 | 51 | 55-0 |
|
| 11-30-24 | Kansas | 17 | -2 | 18 | 31/211 | 12/23/2/280 | 1/1 |
| Baylor | 45 | 62 | 32 | 50/293 | 23/31/0/310 | 1/0 |
| Baylor |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Auburn | 6.5 | W | 16-17 | UN | 58.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Prairie View A&M | -37.5 | W | 44-3 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 34-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Louisiana Tech | -20.5 | L | 36-19 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -11.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado | -8 | W | 23-13 | UN | 54.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6 | W | 10-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona State | 3 | W | 55-19 | OV | 49.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | W | 24-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | TCU | -3.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 6-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-1-1 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:4-0-1 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Long Island | -44.5 | W | 51-6 | P | 57 | | W | 6-0 | OV | | | W | 30-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | Missouri | 4.5 | L | 21-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | W | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Arizona State | 5.5 | L | 17-24 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | PK | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Middle Tenn St | -21.5 | W | 55-0 | OV | 51 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -11.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Utah | 15.5 | L | 24-41 | OV | 49.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 17-21 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Kansas State | 3 | L | 24-35 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 13.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-18 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Virginia Tech | 26 | 50 | 18 | | 18 | 25 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 4-0 / 1-2 | +25.3 / +3.7 | -20.5 / -9.5 |
| Clemson | 20 | -2.5 | 20.5(3) | -0.5 | 18 | 55 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 1-3 / 1-1 | 2-2 / 1-1 | +8 / -13.5 | -13 / +4 |
Clemson is 7-0 straight-up, 6-1 against the spread in the last seven meetings, but the Hokies and Tigers have only met one time in the last five seasons. Virginia Tech broke a two-game losing skid with a 34-24 home win over Georgia Tech last week. Clemson has essentially been in hiding over the last three weeks since losing to Miami. The Tigers had a bye week then a mid-season FCS clash with Charleston Southern. We share similar concerns about that result that we had regarding Texas A&M's win over The Citadel last week. Great, you ran for 231 yards. That's exactly what you should do against an FCS-level opponent. But what about your freshman QB, who desperately needs some valuable experience? Tait Reynolds went 17-of-26 for 127 yards with no touchdowns. Generating 4.9 yards per pass attempt against an FCS opponent is not going to install any confidence, and his back-up Trent Pearman threw two interceptions in the second half. One of Clemson's touchdowns was scored by the defense off a fumble return, so the Tigers' offense only scored 30 points against the Buccaneers. For comparison's sake, Georgia Southern out-gained that same Charleston Southern team 513-117 with a +4.7 yards per play differential earlier this season. Clemson's 24-10 road win at Cal has lost some luster over the last few weeks after the Bears lost to UNLV and Wake Forest. If there wasn't a lightning strike in suburban Spartanburg in Week 3, Clemson probably would have lost to North Carolina. So do the Tigers have any games that they can hang their hat on right now?
Play Virginia Tech
| Virginia Tech | 29 / 28 | +1 | 18 | 23 | -7 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Clemson | 24.7 / 17 | +7.7 | 20 | 28 | -10.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Virginia Tech | 10-17 | Georgia T. | -9 | 55 | 34-24 | Clemson | 10-17 | Charlesto. | -42.5 | 53 | 37-0 |
| | 10-10 | @ California | -11 | 52 | 20-25 | | 10-03 | Miami Flo. | +14 | 49 | 13-41 |
| | 10-02 | Pittsburg. | -1 | 53 | 33-35 | | 09-25 | @ California | -2.5 | 52 | 24-10 |
|
| 11-09-24 | Clemson | 24 | -5.5 | 20 | 44/170 | 16/34/1/211 | 1/0 |
| Virginia Tech | 14 | 54.5 | 15 | 21/40 | 16/37/2/188 | 1/1 |
| Virginia Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:5-0 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:7-0 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | VMI | -54.5 | W | 73-3 | OV | 60.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 45-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Old Dominion | -18 | W | 44-21 | OV | 47.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-3 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | W | 34-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | W | 35-26 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -0.5 | W | 27-14 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Boston College | -14.5 | L | 21-14 | UN | 45.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Pittsburgh U | -1 | L | 33-35 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 24-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ California | -11 | L | 20-25 | UN | 52 | -2.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-10 | UN | 27 |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia Tech | -9 | W | 34-24 | OV | 55 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -6 | W | 24-3 | UN | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Clemson |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ LSU | 10 | L | 10-51 | OV | 49 | 3 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia Southern | -19.5 | L | 22-7 | UN | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11 | L | 16-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | North Carolina | -3 | W | 28-20 | OV | 44.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 7.5 | -1.5 | L | 6-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ California | -2.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 52 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Miami Florida | 14 | L | 13-41 | OV | 49 | 3.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Charleston Southern | -42.5 | L | 37-0 | UN | 53 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 10-24-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tex San Antonio | 34 | -3 | 28 | -4.5 | 28 | 33 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 2-1-1 / 2-1 | 4-0 / 0-3 | +13.5 / -5.7 | -13.5 / +6.5 |
| Tulane | 23 | 51.5 | 34.5(2) | | 33 | 27 | 3-0 / 0-3 | 1-2 / 2-1 | 1-2 / 1-2 | +7 / -9.3 | -7 / +12 |
The home team has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings. UTSA earned a 48-26 home win in the Alamodome last year. Tulane had an extra day to prep for this one after beating Memphis at home last week. The Green Wave have covered the spread in each of their last three games as an underdog, including last week's outright upset of the Tigers. Dating back to the end of last season, the under is 9-2 in Tulane's last 11 games. UTSA has won each of its last four games. The RoadRunners handled business at home over the last two weeks, beating South Florida and Navy in San Antonio. We tip our cap to the Green Wave for last week's effort against Memphis, but Tulane was the beneficiary of six turnovers and that was still a six-point game at the two-minute warning. If you recover six turnovers and can't build a lead larger than six points, that's a problem. Tulane finished that game with 12 first downs. From an athlete perspective, UTSA's players are going to profile very similar to the Duke and Kansas State teams that each beat Tulane by double digits earlier this season.
Play UTSA
| Tex San Antonio | 28.3 / 24 | +4.3 | 28 | 37 | -7.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Tulane | 24 / 19.3 | +4.7 | 34 | 35 | -2 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Tex San Antonio | 10-17 | Navy | -5.5 | 53 | 38-34 | Tulane | 10-16 | Memphis | +6.5 | 55.5 | 31-17 |
| | 10-08 | South Flo. | -5.5 | 49.5 | 31-24 | | 10-10 | @ Army | +5.5 | 49 | 17-20 |
| | 10-03 | @ Rice | -11.5 | 56 | 16-14 | | 09-26 | So Missis. | -18 | 52.5 | 24-21 |
|
| 10-30-25 | Tulane | 26 | -6 | 24 | 25/135 | 21/36/3/299 | 2/1 |
| Tex San Antonio | 48 | 53.5 | 28 | 35/132 | 32/34/0/391 | 1/0 |
| Tex San Antonio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-2-1 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UT Rio Grande Valley | -28 | W | 45-16 | OV | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas State | 1.5 | W | 31-26 | UN | 65.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 14 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas | 30 | W | 6-30 | UN | 58.5 | 7.5 | W | 3-10 | UN | 13.5 | 18 | W | 3-20 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado State | -14 | PK | 59-45 | OV | 56.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | W | 35-21 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rice | -11.5 | L | 16-14 | UN | 56 | -3.5 | L | 6-7 | OV | 12.5 | -6.5 | W | 16-7 | UN | 28 |
| 10-08-26 | South Florida | -5.5 | W | 31-24 | OV | 49.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10 | -3 | L | 10-17 | OV | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Navy | -5.5 | L | 38-34 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | -3 | L | 21-20 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tulane |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:0-5-1 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-2-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Duke | 9.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 51.5 | 3 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | South Alabama | -10 | L | 28-24 | OV | 48 | -3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | -6.5 | L | 14-10 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas State | 20.5 | W | 20-31 | OV | 50 | 5.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | So Mississippi | -18 | L | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -5.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -10 | L | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Army | 5.5 | W | 17-20 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-16-26 | Memphis | 6.5 | W | 31-17 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | W | 23-10 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hawaii | 17 | -2.5 | 42 | -9 | 39 | 27 | 1-3 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 0-4 / 1-2 | -5 / -15 | +1.5 / +7.5 |
| No Illinois | 24 | 49 | 53(2) | | 49 | 46 | 0-2 / 0-4 | 0-2 / 1-3 | 1-1 / 2-2 | -12.5 / -26 | +4.5 / +20.5 |
We're really doing this, huh? Welcome to the Mountain West! To no one's surprise, this is the first-ever meeting between Hawaii and Northern Illinois. This will be the Warriors' farthest trip east thus far. Hawaii has gone 0-3 straight-up, 1-2 against the spread on the mainland with losses at Stanford, Wyoming and Arizona State. The Warriors' last six games have all gone under the total. Hawaii blew a nice chance to pick up a signature win over New Mexico, but the Warriors let that slip by as a 14-point 'dog. Hawaii led 10-0 at halftime and the Lobos' starting QB was knocked out, but Timmy Chang's squad couldn't close the deal. Northern Illinois heads home looking to snap an eight-game losing skid. The Huskies are 1-5 against the spread this season, yet somehow they are favored in this matchup. Northern Illinois' interim head coach Rob Harley has had his hands full this season, but if we can offer him a word of advice, don't throw the ball 44 times in this game. Huskies' QB Taron Dickens attempted 44 passes in last week's loss to Wyoming in a game that was never really out of reach until midway through the fourth quarter. Northern Illinois abandoned the run a little too early against the Cowboys considering Telly Johnson Jr. had 139 yards on 16 carries. Hawaii's defense has allowed an average of 180.7 rushing yards per game this season. Following their fourth cross-Pacific trip, Harley's best path to success against Hawaii's defense is to keep things as simple as possible.
Play Northern Illinois
| Hawaii | 12.7 / 23.7 | -11 | 40 | 31 | +11 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| No Illinois | 14.7 / 34.7 | -20 | 50 | 44 | +7.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Hawaii | 10-17 | New Mexico | +14.5 | 46.5 | 10-21 | No Illinois | 10-17 | @ Wyoming | +7.5 | 43 | 23-41 |
| | 10-10 | @ Arizona S. | +20.5 | 51 | 12-30 | | 10-10 | Air Force | +6.5 | 48.5 | 7-28 |
| | 10-03 | San Jose . | -2.5 | 51.5 | 16-20 | | 09-26 | @ Georgia S. | +8.5 | 56.5 | 14-35 |
| Hawaii |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-6 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:0-7-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-6-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Stanford | 4.5 | L | 27-37 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10 | 3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 24 |
| 09-05-26 | UNLV | 1.5 | L | 6-21 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | New Mexico State | -7.5 | W | 29-19 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 9-0 | UN | 10 | -4 | W | 19-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Wyoming | -2 | L | 10-27 | UN | 44 | -0.5 | L | 3-3 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-13 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | San Jose State | -2.5 | L | 16-20 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -1.5 | L | 0-14 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Arizona State | 20.5 | W | 12-30 | UN | 51 | 5.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 11.5 | W | 6-17 | UN | 27 |
| 10-17-26 | New Mexico | 14.5 | W | 10-21 | UN | 46.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| No Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-6 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-6 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Iowa | 31 | L | 0-40 | UN | 44.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-20 | OV | 10 | 18.5 | L | 0-33 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Illinois State | 2.5 | L | 24-28 | OV | 48 | | L | 0-14 | OV | | | L | 17-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arizona U | 34.5 | W | 17-42 | OV | 50 | 7.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 10-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia State | 8.5 | L | 14-35 | UN | 56.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Air Force | 6.5 | L | 7-28 | UN | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Wyoming | 7.5 | L | 23-41 | OV | 43 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 7.5 | 4 | L | 6-20 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana | 34 | -11.5 | 35.5 | -10.5 | 36 | 37 | 4-0 / 1-2 | 2-1-1 / 3-0 | 0-4 / 2-1 | +17 / +2.3 | -9 / +8 |
| So Mississippi | 16 | 52.5 | 47(1) | | 48 | 40 | 1-2 / 0-3 | 1-2 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 1-2 | +2.7 / -19.7 | -3.5 / +20 |
Southern Miss has covered the spread in each of the last six meetings, including a 22-10 road win in Lafayette last season. Things look quite different in Hattiesburg these days where the Eagles have lost five-straight games (1-4 ATS). Southern Miss is 0-9 straight-up in its last nine games against FBS-level opponents. Getting a consistent week-to-week effort out of the Eagles has been a problem all season. Their Week 6 game at Troy went over the total by 37.5 points. The following week's game against Arkansas State stayed under the total by 25.5 points. Who knows what you're going to get in regards to the point spread on a weekly basis. One week, Southern Miss fails to cover the spread by 24.5 points against UConn. The following week, they cover the spread by 14.5 points against Tulane. The Eagles are a stay-away team, as far as we're concerned. Louisiana caught a somewhat-lucky break last week as the Ragin' Cajuns beat Troy. Trojans' starting QB Goose Crowder was injured in that contest and Troy couldn't get the offense running with a back-up QB. In the end, a win's a win and Louisiana is now 5-2 straight-up, 6-1 against the spread. The lone spread loss came against Arkansas State where the Cajuns only won by three as a 4.5-point favorite. Louisiana does have a bye next week, so there is the slight concern about looking past the Eagles and looking toward some jambalaya. But after Southern Miss won in Lafayette last season, we're thinkin' the Cajuns might want to get some revenge while the opportunity is here.
Play Louisiana
| Louisiana | 29 / 19.3 | +9.7 | 36 | 37 | -1.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| So Mississippi | 22.7 / 34 | -11.3 | 48 | 37 | +11 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Louisiana | 10-17 | Troy | -3 | 49.5 | 33-6 | So Mississippi | 10-17 | Arkansas . | +5.5 | 61 | 13-23 |
| | 10-10 | @ Louisiana. | +3 | 48 | 31-32 | | 10-06 | @ Troy | +9.5 | 51.5 | 34-55 |
| | 10-03 | Arkansas . | -5 | 49 | 23-20 | | 09-26 | @ Tulane | +18 | 52.5 | 21-24 |
|
| 10-18-25 | So Mississippi | 22 | -5 | 14 | 38/136 | 13/18/1/237 | 1/1 |
| Louisiana | 10 | 54.5 | 19 | 48/217 | 14/27/2/135 | 2/1 |
| Louisiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-1-1 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:6-0 , O/U:0-6-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lamar | -20.5 | W | 38-7 | UN | 48.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ USC | 30.5 | W | 30-49 | OV | 59 | 7.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 18.5 | W | 10-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UAB | -7 | PK | 21-14 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Charlotte | -9 | W | 34-7 | UN | 49 | -2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -5.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas St | -5 | L | 23-20 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 7-10 | UN | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | 3 | W | 31-32 | OV | 48 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Troy | -3 | W | 33-6 | UN | 49.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 19-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| So Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-5 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:0-5 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Alcorn State | -19.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Auburn | 32 | L | 8-43 | UN | 56.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 8-27 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Connecticut | 3.5 | L | 20-48 | OV | 54.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 12.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-27 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tulane | 18 | W | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 10 | W | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-06-26 | @ Troy | 9.5 | L | 34-55 | OV | 51.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas St | 5.5 | L | 13-23 | UN | 61 | 0.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-16 | UN | 31 |
| 10-24-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| LSU | 31 | -7 | 9 | -5.5 | 9 | 19 | 5-0 / 0-2 | 3-2 / 0-2 | 3-2 / 1-1 | +36.2 / -4.5 | -25 / -6 |
| Auburn | 19 | 52 | 17.5(3) | | 17 | 2 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 1-1 | 1-2 / 1-1 | +12 / -3.5 | -13 / +12.5 |
This will be the first meeting between these SEC foes since LSU's 48-18 home win in October 2023. Lane, we know it's not easy, but we need you to focus here. LSU has a bye after this game, and with Kiffin's obsession with recruiting, he's probably got a laundry list of players to go see during the week off. But if he can focus on the here-and-now and not plan his 2027 roster, the Bayou Bengals still have a realistic shot at the College Football Playoffs. With losses to Notre Dame, Georgia, Indiana, Alabama and Texas last week, the door is starting to crack for a three-loss team to make the playoff. LSU still has profile-boosting opportunities against Auburn, Alabama, Texas and Tennessee down the stretch. A 4-1 run would likely send the Tigers to the postseason. LSU should be relatively well-rested after beating Mississippi State 31-0 last week. The Bulldogs were playing with a back-up QB, and after LSU took a 14-0 lead in the first quarter, it was pretty clear that Mississippi State wasn't going to keep up. Auburn returns home after winning at Georgia last week as a 19.5-point road 'dog. Tigers' QB Byrum Brown had his Superman cape on last week, but we simply haven't seen enough from Auburn's offense to suggest War Eagle can pull off another upset this week. Over the last three games, Brown has averaged 149.7 passing yards per game. LSU fans thought their playoff hopes were likely dashed after the loss to Kentucky two weeks ago, but Kiffin can now begin to dangle that carrot because a realistic path is beginning to emerge. Look for LSU to come out firing once again in this one.
Play LSU
| LSU | 42.7 / 16.3 | +26.3 | 9 | 31 | -27 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Auburn | 20.7 / 21 | -0.3 | 17 | 11 | +5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| LSU | 10-17 | Mississip. | -17.5 | 56.5 | 31-0 | Auburn | 10-17 | @ Georgia | +19 | 50 | 27-24 |
| | 10-10 | @ Kentucky | -9 | 50.5 | 34-35 | | 10-03 | @ Tennessee. | +6 | 54 | 14-24 |
| | 10-03 | McNeese S. | -54 | 62.5 | 63-14 | | 09-26 | Vanderbilt | -10 | 54.5 | 21-15 |
| LSU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-1-1 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Clemson | -10 | W | 51-10 | OV | 49 | -3 | W | 17-3 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 31-3 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Louisiana Tech | -34.5 | L | 45-14 | OV | 55 | -9.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Mississippi | -3 | L | 24-32 | UN | 59 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Texas A&M | -8 | W | 35-6 | UN | 52.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | McNeese State | -54 | L | 63-14 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | @ Kentucky | -9 | L | 34-35 | OV | 50.5 | -3 | PK | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 17-21 | OV | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | Mississippi St | -17.5 | W | 31-0 | UN | 56.5 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Auburn |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Baylor | -6.5 | L | 17-16 | UN | 58.5 | -1.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | So Mississippi | -32 | W | 43-8 | UN | 56.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 27-8 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida | 2.5 | L | 39-44 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Vanderbilt | -10 | L | 21-15 | UN | 54.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Tennessee U | 6 | L | 14-24 | UN | 54 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Georgia | 19 | W | 27-24 | OV | 50 | 4.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-24-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Samford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa | 20 | -7.5 | 17.5 | | 17 | 18 | 3-1 / 2-0 | 2-2 / 2-0 | 1-3 / 1-1 | +20.3 / +9 | -17 / +4 |
| Minnesota U | 23 | 41 | 19(2) | -0.5 | 20 | 27 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 1-3 / 2-0 | +16.8 / -12.5 | -14.5 / +5 |
Iowa has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings, including a 41-3 romp in Iowa City last year. The Hawkeyes scored 41 points with only 274 total yards on offense. Iowa scored off a 34-yard interception return for a touchdown and a 50-yard punt return for a touchdown. We're guessing the film from that game kept PJ Fleck up for a while. Iowa QB Jeremy Hecklinski is expected to get the start this week. On the Hawkeyes' early-week depth chart, Kirk Ferentz had Hecklinski and Hank Brown listed as co-starters but he has reportedly made up his mind. Iowa is coming off its bye. Hecklinski went 14-of-19 for 202 passing yards with three touchdowns and no interceptions in the previous week's win over Washington. Minnesota is also coming off its bye after previously falling at Purdue. Prior to that loss, the Gophers had won-and-covered each of their previous three games. Fleck's teams typically don't lay too many duds, and it feels like the Gophers have already gotten two (vs Mississippi State being the other) out of their system. Iowa closed as a 7.5-point home favorite in this game last year, and now the Hawkeyes are essentially laying the same number on the road in Minneapolis? We're struggling to get on board with that. With both teams coming off a bye, it's Minnesota or pass in our opinion.
Play Minnesota
10/20 2:09 PM PDT — QB Jeremy Hecklinski is expected to get the start this week. On the Hawkeyes' early-week depth chart, Kirk Ferentz had Hecklinski and Hank Brown listed as co-starters but he has reportedly made up his mind. Hecklinski went 14-of-19 for 202 passing yards with three touchdowns and no interceptions in the previous week's win over Washington.
| Iowa | 25 / 24.7 | +0.3 | 17 | 11 | +7.5 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Minnesota U | 20 / 26.3 | -6.3 | 20 | 19 | +5.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Iowa | 10-09 | @ Washingto. | +3 | 41.5 | 41-24 | Minnesota U | 10-10 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | 48.5 | 13-41 |
| | 10-03 | Ohio State | +14.5 | 46.5 | 14-31 | | 10-03 | Michigan | +6.5 | 42 | 20-14 |
| | 09-26 | @ Michigan | +4.5 | 40 | 20-19 | | 09-26 | @ Washingto. | +12 | 45 | 27-24 |
|
| 10-25-25 | Minnesota U | 3 | 39 | 10 | 25/24 | 16/28/3/109 | 1/0 |
| Iowa | 41 | -7.5 | 13 | 35/135 | 13/20/0/141 | 0/0 |
| Iowa |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | No Illinois | -31 | W | 40-0 | UN | 44.5 | -7.5 | W | 20-0 | OV | 10 | -18.5 | W | 33-0 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Iowa State | -14 | L | 16-13 | UN | 42.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Northern Iowa | -37.5 | W | 55-0 | OV | 48.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Michigan | 4.5 | W | 20-19 | UN | 40 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 7.5 | 2 | L | 7-10 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio State | 14.5 | L | 14-31 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-10 | OV | 7.5 | 7.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ Washington U | 3 | W | 41-24 | OV | 41.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-0 | OV | 7.5 | 1.5 | W | 27-3 | OV | 20 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Minnesota U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-2-1 |
| 09-03-26 | Eastern Illinois | -42.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 52.5 | 0 | W | 14-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 35-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Mississippi St | 1 | L | 13-38 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | L | 6-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Akron | -22.5 | W | 41-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington U | 12 | W | 27-24 | OV | 45 | 2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 23 |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan | 6.5 | W | 20-14 | UN | 42 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 7-14 | P | 21 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | L | 13-41 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oregon | 23 | -10.5 | 10.5 | -9.5 | 6 | 14 | 3-1 / 1-1 | 1-3 / 1-1 | 2-2 / 2-0 | +23 / +3 | -25 / -14 |
| Illinois | 20 | 49 | 22(2) | | 20 | 26 | 2-2 / 1-1 | 1-3 / 1-1 | 3-1 / 2-0 | +11.5 / -11 | -19 / +12 |
Perhaps the Philadelphia Eagles doctors (who allowed Jalen Hurts back on the field at London on October 11 despite discovering a blood clot in his leg..sheesh!) would have cleared Oregon QB Dante Moore to play last Saturday vs. Nebraska. Yet having not yet gotten beyond concussion protocols in the wake of the scary hit (cheap shot?) delivered by USC LB Desman Stephens II back on September 26 at the LA Coliseum, Moore’s status remains on a week-to-week basis. Before checking to see if Dan Fouts had any remaining eligibility in Eugene, and before it was too late last week vs. the Huskers, Ducks head coach Dan Lanning wisely pulled struggling former third-stringer Brock Thomas and went back to Dylan Raiola, who atoned for a poor showing the week before vs. UCLA by leading the winning rally vs. his former Nebraska team. Still, the Webfoots have been struggling in shallow water the past two weeks, scoring only 16 points per game while splitting a pair of low-scoring decisions at home. Moore has been ruled out again, but worth noting that even in his previous road start at Oklahoma State in September, Oregon lost, and there is a thought among Big Ten insiders that the Ducks are missing departed OC Will Sten, now working his brand of magic at Kentucky. Of course, Illinois counterpart Bret Bielema can relate to Lanning as his QB Katin Houser (via East Carolina) is now sidelined into November with a hand injury, requiring frosh Michael Clayton II out of the bullpen to pull out an OT win over Michigan State on October 10. Though last week’s bye at least gave Clayton (who showed no fear when completing 6-of-8 for 88 yards and 2 TDs when coming in late vs. the Spartans) a chance to get better acclimated, and he can lean a bit on a serviceable infantry that pounded out nearly 200 yards on the ground at Ohio State a few weeks ago and features an Air Force-style, between-the-tackles banger in senior Aidan Laughery, gaining better than 6.3 yards per carry. Bottom line? The Ducks have only covered two of their last eight vs. FBS opposition, and even if Moore returns, we're struggling to see how Oregon will rediscover its knockout power. With QB questions on both sides, we're expecting another low-scoring affair.
Play the Under
10/19 2:25 PM PDT — Illinois will be turning to true freshman QB Michael Clayton after normal-starter Katin Houser suffered an injury two weeks ago against Michigan State. Clayton went 6-for-8 with two touchdown passes in relief of Houser against the Spartans.
10/22 12:55 AM PDT — Oregon's top wide receiver Evan Stewart, who missed last week's game against the Huskers, was arrested for DUI on Sunday morning. Meanwhile, QB Dante Moore missed a second straight game last Saturday vs. Nebraska dealing with concussion symptoms, and H C Dan Lanning announced at midweek that both would miss this game vs. the Fighting Illini at Champaign-Urbana.
| Oregon | 24.3 / 19.3 | +5 | 7 | 14 | -6.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Illinois | 24.7 / 34.3 | -9.7 | 19 | 19 | +5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Oregon | 10-17 | Nebraska | -6 | 51 | 17-14 | Illinois | 10-10 | @ Michigan . | -2.5 | 48.5 | 38-37 |
| | 10-10 | UCLA | -10 | 58 | 15-17 | | 10-03 | Purdue | -9 | 62 | 17-24 |
| | 09-26 | @ USC | -3.5 | 60.5 | 41-27 | | 09-26 | @ Ohio State | +26 | 53.5 | 19-42 |
|
| 10-26-24 | Illinois | 9 | 54 | 18 | 32/132 | 17/35/2/161 | 0/0 |
| Oregon | 38 | -22 | 27 | 39/229 | 20/28/1/298 | 0/0 |
| Oregon |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:0-5-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Boise State | -25.5 | L | 34-27 | OV | 53 | -7 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -14.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Oklahoma State | -24 | L | 31-39 | OV | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | L | 17-24 | OV | 30 |
| 09-18-26 | Portland St | -58.5 | W | 84-0 | OV | 71.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 49-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ USC | -3.5 | W | 41-27 | OV | 60.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-10-26 | UCLA | -10 | L | 15-17 | UN | 58 | -3.5 | L | 6-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6.5 | L | 6-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Nebraska | -6 | L | 17-14 | UN | 51 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 26 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | UAB | -25.5 | L | 42-23 | OV | 54 | -7 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | L | 21-13 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Duke | -6 | L | 27-31 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Southern Illinois | -35 | W | 48-10 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Ohio State | 26 | W | 19-42 | OV | 53.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | L | 10-28 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Purdue | -9 | L | 17-24 | UN | 62 | -2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6 | L | 7-13 | UN | 31 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Michigan State | -2.5 | L | 38-37 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Colorado | 21 | 55.5 | 30 | | 27 | 12 | 1-2 / 1-2 | 1-2 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 0-2 | +2 / -14.3 | -3.5 / +6 |
| Oklahoma State | 40 | -13 | 20(2) | -12 | 22 | 17 | 3-0 / 1-2 | 3-0 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 2-1 | +27 / 0 | -14 / -2 |
At least it looks like the Buffs haven’t tuned out Coach Prime, who coaxed perhaps the best effort from his team across the past two seasons when making unbeaten Utah sweat somewhat-profusely last Saturday night in Boulder. Let’s, however, not sugarcoat what is happening with Deion and Colorado football, which has been spared a bit of extra scrutiny along the Front Range in recent weeks simply because the Denver Post and other regional media outlets are more preoccupied with the Broncos and the travails of Bo Nix. Remember, Deion is no longer working for the AD (Rick George) who splashed out extra millions on a contract extension that the school is now struggling to cash. Sanders is an inherited cost for new AD Fernando Lovo, hired with a mandate to straighten out the athletic department’s finances...hence the Sanders hot-seat chatter. Though the Isaac Wilson-led attack came close to 400 yards vs. the Utes, the Buffs still haven’t reached that magic level against an FBS opponent this season as Brennan Marion’s “Go-Go” offense has mostly encountered red lights, and the winless slump in the Big XII now extends to more than a year. As the strike(out) force had scored barely 10 points per game vs. Power 4 opposition before tallying a high-water mark vs. of 24 vs. Morgan Scalley’s Salt Lake City bunch last week, a trip to Stillwater to face the high-powered Cowboys looks as treacherous as flying into nearby Aspen in bad weather. The new Eric Morris-led offense has no such troubles scoring (37.2 points per game), while North Texas transfer (along with Morris) QB Drew Mestemaker is moving up Mel Kiper Jr’s NFL draft lists as his season-and-a-half totals with the Mean Green and Cowboys are now better than 6,300 pass yards and 50 TD passes. As Oklahoma State also has a viable infantry spearheaded by another North Texas transfer (RB Caleb Hawkins, well on his way to over 1,000 rushing yards) and the fifth-ranked offense in the country at a robust 518 yards per game, Saturday at Boone Pickens Stadium also becomes this week’s featured tortoise vs. the hare matchup. Yes, Oklahoma State’s defense has been a bit yielding, but mostly because the pace of its games is so brisk. The likes of Oregon (at least with a healthy Dante Moore), West Virginia and Houston have a lot more offense than Deion’s Buffs.
Play Oklahoma State
| Colorado | 14.7 / 26.3 | -11.7 | 28 | 15 | +12 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Oklahoma State | 38.3 / 29 | +9.3 | 22 | 23 | -1.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Colorado | 10-17 | Utah | +15 | 49.5 | 24-27 | Oklahoma State | 10-17 | @ Houston U | +4 | 62 | 32-35 |
| | 10-03 | Texas Tech | +13.5 | 50.5 | 7-29 | | 10-10 | Central F. | -10 | 53.5 | 42-28 |
| | 09-26 | @ Baylor | +8 | 54.5 | 13-23 | | 09-26 | @ West Virg. | +2 | 60.5 | 41-24 |
|
| 11-29-24 | Oklahoma State | 0 | 67 | 10 | 30/76 | 12/34/2/77 | 4/2 |
| Colorado | 52 | -14.5 | 26 | 29/33 | 34/42/1/438 | 0/0 |
| Colorado |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-3-1 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:0-5-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:0-5-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Georgia Tech | 6.5 | W | 14-13 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Weber State | -38.5 | L | 52-21 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 21-7 | OV | | | W | 42-14 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Northwestern | 3.5 | L | 7-41 | P | 48 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-21 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Baylor | 8 | L | 13-23 | UN | 54.5 | 2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 6 | L | 3-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Texas Tech | 13.5 | L | 7-29 | UN | 50.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Utah | 15 | W | 24-27 | OV | 49.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 9.5 | L | 0-13 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oklahoma State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Tulsa | -12.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 57.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 3-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Oregon | 24 | W | 39-31 | OV | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | W | 24-17 | OV | 30 |
| 09-19-26 | Murray State | -55.5 | W | 59-0 | UN | 70 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ West Virginia | 2 | W | 41-24 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13 | 0.5 | L | 13-14 | UN | 31 |
| 10-10-26 | Central Florida | -10 | W | 42-28 | OV | 53.5 | -2.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 21-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Houston U | 4 | W | 32-35 | OV | 62 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 31.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Houston U | 27 | 57.5 | 16.5 | | 17 | 22 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 1-2-1 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +24.3 / +10.3 | -22 / -2 |
| Utah | 29 | -6 | 12.5(3) | -7 | 13 | 30 | 4-0 / 2-0 | 4-0 / 1-1 | 2-2 / 2-0 | +33.8 / +8.5 | -23.5 / -11.5 |
Did the 10th-ranked Utes simply come out flat last week vs. a struggling Colorado? Can Morgan Scalley keep his troops from peaking ahead to what looks like an epic showdown vs. BYU at Salt Lake City in a couple of weeks? Were some of normally-reliable QB Devon Dampier’s mistakes at Boulder (including a couple of picks) vs. the Buffs just a one-off? Many Big XII sources suspect each could be true...though that doesn’t mean an automatic endorsement for Utah this week against what will be its most-formidable challenge yet. Willie Fritz and his Houston Cougars are in the rankings, too (at 14th this week), and still thinking they have a shot at the Big XII title and place in the playoffs as well. Though few north of The Woodlands might be aware of some Heisman-vote-worthy numbers being posted by senior QB Connor Weigman, who has really hit overdrive the past two weeks when tossing a combined nine TD passes in the wins over Kansas State and Oklahoma State, and for the season now on 20 TD passes and just two picks. Houston is more, however, than the dual-threat Weigman (who also has six rushing TDs, by the way), as portal add RB Makhi Hughes, a star for Fritz a couple of years ago at Tulane, has added an exciting infantry diversion with a chance to hit 1,000 rushing yards in what is a well-balanced, 10th-ranked offense in the country at 486 yards per game (Utah, by the way, sits at 9th). The near-miss (but spread cover) at Texas Tech last month, and wins over dangerous Oregon State and Oklahoma State suggests that the Cougs are not going to blink at Rice-Eccles, either, especially after Scalley’s defense would spring some leaks last week vs. a previously-pedestrian Colorado. Keep in mind that it also took the Utes tallying some late scores to finally put away Iowa State and Kansas in recent weeks, before the close shave last week vs. Coach Prime, and the wily Fritz has covered the spread in his last six chances on the Big XII road. This looms as a hard night of work for Utah in its most-challenging assignment yet this season.
Play Houston
| Houston U | 32.3 / 21.7 | +10.7 | 17 | 22 | -4 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Utah | 33 / 21.7 | +11.3 | 12 | 27 | -12.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Houston U | 10-17 | Oklahoma . | -4 | 62 | 35-32 | Utah | 10-17 | @ Colorado | -15 | 49.5 | 27-24 |
| | 10-10 | @ Kansas St. | +2.5 | 55 | 35-16 | | 10-10 | Kansas | -15.5 | 49.5 | 41-24 |
| | 10-03 | Central F. | -10 | 50 | 27-17 | | 09-26 | @ Iowa State | -7.5 | 46.5 | 31-17 |
|
| 10-26-24 | Utah | 14 | -5 | 12 | 26/90 | 20/37/1/216 | 3/1 |
| Houston U | 17 | 36.5 | 16 | 50/228 | 6/13/1/61 | 2/0 |
| Houston U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:6-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Oregon State | -21 | L | 33-20 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 9-7 | OV | 10.5 | -12.5 | L | 19-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern | -52 | W | 77-6 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 49-0 | OV | |
| 09-18-26 | @ Texas Tech | 8 | W | 26-28 | OV | 52.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 17-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia Southern | -17 | L | 42-28 | OV | 56.5 | -4.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -10 | W | 28-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Central Florida | -10 | PK | 27-17 | UN | 50 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Kansas State | 2.5 | W | 35-16 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | 0.5 | W | 21-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Oklahoma State | -4 | L | 35-32 | OV | 62 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-0 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:6-0 , PSR:6-0 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:6-0 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Idaho | -38 | W | 66-14 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | W | 17-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Arkansas | -13.5 | W | 43-10 | UN | 55.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | W | 29-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Utah State | -26.5 | W | 33-0 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | W | 16-0 | OV | 13.5 | -15.5 | W | 26-0 | UN | 30 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Iowa State | -7.5 | W | 31-17 | OV | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -4.5 | W | 24-3 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | Kansas | -15.5 | W | 41-24 | OV | 49.5 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 21-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Colorado | -15 | L | 27-24 | OV | 49.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -9.5 | W | 13-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 10/20 11:11 pm |
| San Jose State | 17 | 46 | 43 | | 43 | 49 | 1-2 / 3-1 | 0-3 / 4-0 | 0-3 / 1-3 | -3 / +1.8 | -7 / +8.5 |
| Nevada | 21 | -6 | 40(2) | -5 | 40 | 30 | 1-2 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 1-2 | +6.3 / -1.3 | +3 / +0.5 |
Facing UTEP certainly helped, but there was no time for any pre-game jitters for San Jose State’s freshman QB Daniel Rolovich (whose dad, Nick, is a former Hawaii and Washington State head coach and currently on the Cal staff) as Ken Niumatalolo made his QB decision just before kickoff last Saturday night at the Sun Bowl with starter Luke Weaver sidelined. Moreover, leading Mountain West rusher Jabari Bates was in dry-dock as well, but such is the depravity of the current Miners that they could not take advantage and lost 24-11. Before regarding that result as an endorsement for Rolovich (193 passing yards last week; likely to remain as the starter moving forward) or Bates’ replacement Viliami Teu (who ran roughshod in El Paso to the tune of 156 rushing yards), we consider the opposition, and note that the last the Spartans traveled to the foot of the Sierras they were obliterated 55-10 by the Wolf Pack in one of last fall’s most-startling results. Meanwhile, Nevada head coach Jeff Choate might be checking on Colin Kaepernick’s eligibility after his starting QB Carter Jones missed last week at North Dakota State with an arm injury and backup AJ Bianco limped thru the night in Fargo after injuring his ankle in the first quarter, with UCLA transfer Luke Duncan now warming up in the bullpen just in case. We must also note San Jose’s imitation of the old LA Rams Fearsome Foursome when sacking UTEP QBs Raymond Moore II and EJ Colson Jr an astounding 11 times (11!!) last week - again most likely due to Miners shortcomings. Yet with the Spartans having now played four-straight games where the scoreline didn’t exceed 36 points, and "under" in six-straight, we’re inclined to paraphrase legendary LA Clippers play-by-play man Ralph Lawler and say “First team to score wins!” As has been the case in recent weeks for San Jose State, and with the QB situations both ways, clearing this total in the mid-40s in Reno looks quite a chore.
Play the Under
10/20 6:13 AM PDT — San Jose State has reportedly made the full-time QB switch from Hawaii transfer Luke Weaver to Daniel Rolovich. Head coach Ken Niumatalolo said the Spartans plan to stick with Rolovich after he led SJSU to a win over UTEP last week.
10/20 6:14 AM PDT — Nevada QB Carter Jones missed last week's game at North Dakota State with an arm injury, and backup AJ Bianco limped thru the game in Fargo after injuring his ankle in the first quarter. UCLA transfer Luke Duncan is taking snaps in practice this week for the Wolf Pack in case Carter and Bianco are out or limited on Saturday in Reno.
| San Jose State | 19 / 14.3 | +4.7 | 42 | 45 | -2.5 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Nevada | 26.7 / 26.7 | 0 | 41 | 38 | +3 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| San Jose State | 10-17 | @ UTEP | -6.5 | 46.5 | 24-11 | Nevada | 10-17 | @ North Dak. | +15 | 42.5 | 17-31 |
| | 10-09 | Wyoming | -4 | 42.5 | 13-16 | | 10-10 | @ UTEP | -10 | 48.5 | 30-13 |
| | 10-03 | @ Hawaii | +2.5 | 51.5 | 20-16 | | 09-26 | Air Force | +4.5 | 50.5 | 33-36 |
|
| 11-15-25 | San Jose State | 10 | -9.5 | 14 | 26/125 | 16/32/4/145 | 1/1 |
| Nevada | 55 | 49.5 | 23 | 42/218 | 16/19/0/195 | 1/0 |
| San Jose State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:0-6-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-2-1 , O/U:0-6-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ USC | 37 | W | 26-42 | OV | 61 | 10 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14 | 23.5 | L | 0-28 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 1 | W | 27-21 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 0 | W | 10-7 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Cal Poly | -21.5 | L | 30-20 | UN | 58.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 13-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Fresno State | 4 | L | 10-26 | UN | 47.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | PK | 3-6 | UN | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Hawaii | 2.5 | W | 20-16 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | W | 14-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-09-26 | Wyoming | -4 | L | 13-16 | UN | 42.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -3 | L | 7-6 | UN | 21 |
| 10-17-26 | @ UTEP | -6.5 | W | 24-11 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nevada |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Kentucky | 0 | W | 49-14 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 21-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Montana State | 4.5 | L | 7-20 | UN | 51.5 | | L | 0-10 | OV | | | L | 0-17 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | -3.5 | L | 20-27 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Air Force | 4.5 | W | 33-36 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ UTEP | -10 | W | 30-13 | UN | 48.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 13-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ North Dakota State | 15 | W | 17-31 | OV | 42.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 7.5 | L | 11-19 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan State | 10 | 44 | 27.5 | | 24 | 18 | 2-3 / 0-2 | 3-1-1 / 1-1 | 2-3 / 0-2 | +3.2 / -22.5 | -2.5 / +19 |
| UCLA | 29 | -16.5 | 18(2) | -11.5 | 20 | 18 | 3-0 / 3-0 | 3-0 / 3-0 | 1-2 / 2-1 | +14 / +24.7 | -9.5 / +1.5 |
Michigan State backers have more-recent memories of New Year’s trips to Pasadena under George Perles and Mark Dantonio, but the Spartans haven’t played UCLA at the Rose Bowl since a very memorable January 1, 1966 upset when Tommy Prothro’s 2-TD underdog Bruins shocked Duffy Daugherty’s top-ranked troops, 14-12. Michigan State has no better memories of the last time it faced UCLA in California, either, a 56-14 pasting in 1974 at the LA Coliseum in what was the first win for Dick Vermeil as Bruins HC...on the same night Nolan Ryan pitched his third no-hitter for the Angels! To the present, and the similarities end between these two that both employ first-year head coaches...it just hasn’t worked nearly as well (at least yet) for the Spartans as it has for the Bruins. Though MSU has been coming closer in recent weeks for new head coach Pat Fitzgerald, it’s still five losses on the spin for the Spartans, where supporters are wondering out loud if Fitzgerald should maybe have looked a bit harder in the portal for a QB than settle upon holdover Alessio Milivojevic, who has only tossed seven TD passes in seven games. The hopes of balancing the offense took a hit early in the 31-13 loss to Nebraska on September 26 when top rusher and UConn transfer RB Cam Edwards went down with a knee injury; Sparty’s infantry has been choppy at best since, as gaining only 3.3 yards per carry has put too much pressure on Milivojevic to carry the offense. The Bruins have had a significant injury, too, as free-wheeling QB Nico Iamaleava is out with his own knee injury, but consistent with new head coach Bob Chesney pushing all of the right buttons. The offense made a seamless transition to Cal Poly transfer Ty Dieffenbach, who brought home the win at Oregon on October 10 and managed last week’s rock-fight vs. Wisconsin rather effectively, completing 22-of-33 passes for 264 yards while finding eight different receivers in the 17-7 win. The real headline lately for Chesney, however, has been the defense, which kept the Ducks and Badgers in relative check while the offense was moving a bit slower the past two weeks. Chesney’s many transfers from JMU and elsewhere are spearheading a big-play platoon that ranks top-20 in overall and rush defense while forcing the second-most takeaways (19) in the country. True, this might turn into another grinder as have the last two wins for Chesney’s troops, but UCLA is proving it can win and cover (5-0-1 vs. line) in many ways, while Michigan State isn’t proving it can win at all. By the way, what sort of odds might you have gotten in August that the Bruins (6-0) would be the only undefeated SEC or Big Ten team by mid-October?
Play the Under
| Michigan State | 20.3 / 31 | -10.7 | 25 | 19 | +6 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| UCLA | 29.3 / 8.3 | +21 | 20 | 16 | +2 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Michigan State | 10-17 | Northwest. | +7 | 50 | 21-24 | UCLA | 10-17 | Wisconsin | -1 | 43 | 17-7 |
| | 10-10 | Illinois | +2.5 | 48.5 | 37-38 | | 10-10 | @ Oregon | +10 | 58 | 17-15 |
| | 10-03 | @ Wisconsin | +8.5 | 43.5 | 3-31 | | 09-26 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | 55.5 | 54-3 |
|
| 10-11-25 | UCLA | 38 | 51.5 | 20 | 43/238 | 16/24/0/180 | 1/0 |
| Michigan State | 13 | -7 | 14 | 25/87 | 16/35/0/166 | 1/0 |
| Michigan State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:4-2-1 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-2-1 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Toledo | -10 | PK | 30-20 | OV | 48.5 | -3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -6.5 | W | 19-7 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Eastern Michigan | -17.5 | W | 35-7 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 26 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Notre Dame | 29 | W | 10-27 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 17.5 | W | 10-17 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Nebraska | 5.5 | L | 13-31 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3 | L | 10-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wisconsin | 8.5 | L | 3-31 | UN | 43.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 6 | L | 3-17 | UN | 22 |
| 10-10-26 | Illinois | 2.5 | W | 37-38 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Northwestern | 7 | W | 21-24 | UN | 50 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | W | 14-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UCLA |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-0 , PSR:6-0 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-0 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ California | -2.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 24-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | San Diego State | -13.5 | W | 28-10 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Purdue | -13.5 | W | 52-38 | OV | 53 | -4.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | W | 54-3 | OV | 55.5 | 0 | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon | 10 | W | 17-15 | UN | 58 | 3.5 | W | 3-6 | UN | 13.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-6 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Wisconsin | -1 | W | 17-7 | UN | 43 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0 | W | 10-0 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas State | 36 | -1 | 20.5 | -1 | 18 | 24 | 4-1 / 0-1 | 3-2 / 0-1 | 3-2 / 1-0 | +19.6 / -5 | -17 / -6 |
| Arizona State | 27 | 51.5 | 23.5(2) | | 24 | 10 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 2-1 / 2-0 | +15 / -28 | -22.5 / +16 |
The days of Sam Leavitt and reaching the playoffs two years ago must now seem like a dream for the Sun Devils and their fans, who might have been lured into a false sense of security by that opening 70-7 napalming of outmanned Morgan State. If Arizona State played in the MEAC, that result could have foretold of something positive, but since then the Sun Devils have lost three times while allowing 52 points per game in the defeats, causing the ghost of Frank Kush to reappear in Tempe and threaten wind sprints to the current team until they drop from exhaustion. What’s more disturbing to the locals in the Valley of the Sun is that the last Big XII foe to hit Mountain America (nee Sun Devil Stadium), Baylor, put 55 on Kenny Dillingham’s team. That came from a Bears offense that couldn’t even generate a single TD in last week’s loss to TCU. Dillingham’s Kentucky transfer QB Cutter Boley (who might be wishing he stayed in Lexington) hasn’t been the same since facing Morgan State, either, with just seven TD passes in six games after rifling six vs. the Bears. Though his latest pick-six (Boley’s third such miscue this season) earned him a place on the bench in the second half last Saturday in Lubbock, with well-traveled Mikey Keene (UCF, Fresno State, and Michigan in previous stops) faring well enough in relief with 256 passing yards that a permanent switch is likely to be confirmed by Dillingham later in the week. No such QB issues at K-State, where senior Avery Johnson is in his third year as the full-time starter and reminded all last week what he could also do with his legs when the mood strikes, scampering for 132 yards on the ground to go along with another 209 passing yards as the Wildcats would rally from behind to outscore rival Kansas in Manhattan. Granted, K-State isn’t perfect, as defensive shortcomings proved costly in defeats at Cincinnati and home vs. Houston in front of last week’s win vs. the Jayhawks, but stop-end issues seem more acute in Tempe. After all, the Sun Devils have been apt to concede half-a-hundred in recent weeks!
Play the Over
10/20 6:17 AM PDT — Sun Devils head coach Kenny Dillingham pulled starting QB Cutter Boley after halftime last week at Texas Tech after Boley tossed two more picks and his third pick-six of the season in the first half against the Red Raiders. Transfer Mikey Keene (formerly at UCF, Fresno State and Michigan) replaced Boley for the second half and fared well enough with 256 passing yards and two TDs that Dillingham is expected to announce a permanent switch later in the week.
| Kansas State | 25.7 / 30 | -4.3 | 18 | 23 | -4 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Arizona State | 24.7 / 40 | -15.3 | 23 | 24 | -2 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Kansas State | 10-17 | Kansas | -3 | 55 | 35-24 | Arizona State | 10-17 | @ Texas Tech | +17 | 50 | 25-53 |
| | 10-10 | Houston U | -2.5 | 55 | 16-35 | | 10-10 | Hawaii | -20.5 | 51 | 30-12 |
| | 09-26 | @ Cincinnat. | -6 | 55 | 26-31 | | 10-03 | Baylor | -3 | 49.5 | 19-55 |
|
| 11-16-24 | Arizona State | 24 | 51.5 | 23 | 38/123 | 21/34/0/275 | 1/1 |
| Kansas State | 14 | -7.5 | 21 | 25/154 | 24/40/2/258 | 1/1 |
| Kansas State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:1-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:1-3-1 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Nicholls State | -41.5 | W | 71-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 22-0 | OV | | | W | 36-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Washington State | -17.5 | W | 34-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10 | -10 | PK | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tulane | -20.5 | L | 31-20 | OV | 50 | -5.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Cincinnati U | -6 | L | 26-31 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Houston U | -2.5 | L | 16-35 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-21 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Kansas | -3 | W | 35-24 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 13.5 | -1.5 | L | 18-17 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:1-3-1 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Morgan State | -43.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 28-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas A&M | 14.5 | L | 20-48 | OV | 51.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas | -5.5 | W | 24-17 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | PK | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Baylor | -3 | L | 19-55 | OV | 49.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 13-24 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Hawaii | -20.5 | L | 30-12 | UN | 51 | -5.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -11.5 | L | 17-6 | UN | 27 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas Tech | 17 | L | 25-53 | OV | 50 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 9.5 | 9 | L | 10-43 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa State | 17 | 51.5 | 27 | | 27 | 16 | 3-1 / 0-2 | 1-2-1 / 1-1 | 3-1 / 0-2 | +16.3 / -8.5 | -12 / +13 |
| Arizona U | 33 | -12 | 18(2) | -11 | 18 | 28 | 3-0 / 2-1 | 1-2 / 1-2 | 1-2 / 2-1 | +26.7 / +6.7 | -25 / -2.5 |
Still lurking menacingly just off the pace in the conference race, Arizona is one of several Big XII contenders that still sees a path for itself to the league title game in Arlington and then perhaps a spot in the playoffs. Wishful thinking, perhaps? Not necessarily, with the earlier loss at BYU (when ‘Cats fans thought they were done no favors by the refs) aging quite well as Brent Brennan’s team has climbed back into the top-25 (at 25...hey, it still counts!) after four successive wins. Thumping competitive Cincinnati and West Virginia on the spin in front of last week’s bye has further fueled optimism for a late-season push in Tucson, especially with almost all hands on deck and four-year starting QB Noah Fifita on a recent heater with 13 TD passes across his last four games in which the Cats have scored a hefty 41 points per game. Fifita is making sure to use the weapons at his disposal, too, as Arizona counts seven different receivers who have caught a TD pass and six with double-digit receptions, including sophomore speedball Isaiah Mizell, who has emerged as a home run threat deluxe while gaining almost 19 yards per catch and off of a destructive effort vs. the Mountaineers in Morgantown when his 72-yard TD bomb from Fifita put West Virginia on the ropes before another deep-ball weapon, WR Brandon Phelps (almost 19 yards per catch as well), turned out the lights on former ‘Cat coach Rich Rod and his crew with his own 42-yard TD catch in the fourth quarter. True, first-year head coach Jimmy Rogers is squeezing as much as he can out of his Iowa State roster (as Rogers did last year at Washington State), but the Cyclones have a lower ceiling, as the offense has been limited in recent losses to Utah and BYU with former Arkansas State QB Jaylen Raynor (just seven TD passes) not quite the big-play threat he was in the Sun Belt. Granted, Rogers has schemed and plotted well enough for his troops to avoid heavy defeats, but a pair of 14-point losses to loop leaders BYU and Utah reflect about where the Cyclones are in the conference pecking order. If forced to play catch-up, the Cyclones chances to keep this scoreline within single digits will likely diminish further.
Play Arizona
| Iowa State | 24 / 32.3 | -8.3 | 26 | 18 | +5.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Arizona U | 40 / 20.7 | +19.3 | 18 | 29 | -7 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Iowa State | 10-09 | @ BYU | +11.5 | 46.5 | 10-24 | Arizona U | 10-10 | @ West Virg. | -3.5 | 61.5 | 52-31 |
| | 10-03 | West Virg. | -3 | 53 | 45-42 | | 10-03 | Cincinnat. | -7 | 56.5 | 34-7 |
| | 09-26 | Utah | +7.5 | 46.5 | 17-31 | | 09-26 | @ Washingto. | -11 | 47 | 34-24 |
|
| 09-27-25 | Arizona U | 14 | 48 | 20 | 24/107 | 32/48/2/253 | 0/0 |
| Iowa State | 39 | -4 | 19 | 46/112 | 15/22/1/288 | 0/0 |
| Iowa State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-3-1 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Missouri St | -29.5 | L | 38-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Iowa | 14 | W | 13-16 | UN | 42.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Bowling Green | -22.5 | W | 55-7 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | W | 35-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Utah | 7.5 | L | 17-31 | OV | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 4.5 | L | 3-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | West Virginia | -3 | PK | 45-42 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ BYU | 11.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 7 | L | 3-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-1 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northern Arizona | -33.5 | L | 35-7 | UN | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ BYU | 6.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 48.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | No Illinois | -34.5 | L | 42-17 | OV | 50 | -7.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington State | -11 | L | 34-24 | OV | 47 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Cincinnati U | -7 | W | 34-7 | UN | 56.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ West Virginia | -3.5 | W | 52-31 | OV | 61.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -1.5 | W | 24-17 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tech Play | | Updated: 10/20 7:07 pm |
| Mississippi | 27 | 55 | 7.5 | | 8 | 14 | 3-0 / 1-1 | 2-1 / 1-1 | 0-3 / 2-0 | +22.7 / +5.5 | -15 / -3 |
| Texas | 24 | -3 | 8(3) | -2.5 | 6 | 13 | 3-1 / 1-0 | 1-3 / 0-1 | 1-3 / 0-1 | +18.5 / +3 | -18.5 / -5 |
This will be the first meeting between the Longhorns and Rebels since Texas joined the SEC. The last time these teams took the field was part of a home-and-home series in 2012-13, which was won-and-covered by the road team in each game. After beating Ohio State in non-conference play, Texas generated plenty of room-for-error as the Longhorns navigated a tricky SEC slate. Over the last two weeks, that room for error has quickly evaporated. Texas has lost back-to-back games as a 7.5-point favorite over Oklahoma and as a 13.5-point favorite against Florida (with a back-up QB). The Longhorns have failed to cover the spread in each of their last five games. When favored by at least three points in an SEC game, Texas has gone 5-14 against the spread under Steve Sarkisian. Longhorns' defensive end Colin Simmons is not expected to play this week while he deals with an ankle injury. Over the past three seasons, Simmons has produced a total of 31.5 sacks, including 8.5 over the past three weeks against Tennessee, Oklahoma and Florida. Perhaps inspired by the QB change in Ann Arbor last week, Coach Sark will reportedly give back-up QB Karle Lacey more first-team reps in practice this week to see how his team responds. Over the last three weeks, starting QB Arch Manning has the same number of turnovers (4) as touchdowns (4). At this point of the SEC schedule, bumps and bruises matter. We just mentioned that Texas will be without its top defender and the Longhorns were just involved in three-straight games that were all decided by a field goal. Ole Miss, on the other hand, just out-scored Vanderbilt and Missouri by a combined margin of 83-20 (and the Rebels had a bye week before that). Trinidad Chambliss has been sacked a total of five times in six games, and he didn’t have to use his legs at all against the Tigers and Commodores over the last two weeks. So on one side, we have a rested team with a QB that's not getting touched, facing a beat-up team that's going down to the wire every week with a quarterback on the hot seat. You don't have to twist our arm. Hotty Toddy.
Play Ole Miss
10/19 2:28 PM PDT — Longhorns' defensive end Colin Simmons is not expected to play this week while he deals with an ankle injury. Over the past three seasons, Simmons has produced a total of 31.5 sacks, including 8.5 over the past three weeks against Tennessee, Oklahoma and Florida.
| Mississippi | 37 / 24 | +13 | 8 | 14 | -3 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Texas | 22.7 / 23.7 | -1 | 5 | 12 | -8.5 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Mississippi | 10-17 | Missouri | -4 | 57 | 31-3 | Texas | 10-17 | Florida | -13 | 51.5 | 24-27 |
| | 10-10 | @ Vanderbilt | -9.5 | 55 | 52-17 | | 10-10 | @ Oklahoma | -7.5 | 41 | 24-27 |
| | 09-26 | @ Florida | +4 | 59 | 28-52 | | 09-26 | @ Tennessee. | -5 | 54.5 | 20-17 |
| Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-1 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:3-2-1 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Louisville | -6.5 | L | 41-38 | OV | 54.5 | -3 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | -4 | PK | 10-6 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Charlotte | -44 | L | 41-9 | UN | 59.5 | -13.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14.5 | -27.5 | L | 27-0 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | LSU | 3 | W | 32-24 | UN | 59 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | 1.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Florida | 4 | L | 28-52 | OV | 59 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Vanderbilt | -9.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 55 | -3.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -5.5 | W | 42-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Missouri | -4 | W | 31-3 | UN | 57 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | W | 21-3 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wofford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:1-4-1 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:3-2-1 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Texas State | -29.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 61.5 | -7.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -17.5 | W | 28-7 | OV | 33 |
| 09-12-26 | Ohio State | -2 | L | 24-23 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tex San Antonio | -30 | L | 30-6 | UN | 58.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18 | L | 20-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tennessee U | -5 | L | 20-17 | UN | 54.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -3 | W | 10-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma | -7.5 | L | 24-27 | OV | 41 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -4 | W | 17-7 | OV | 20 |
| 10-17-26 | Florida | -13 | L | 24-27 | UN | 51.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | PK | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oklahoma | 27 | -2 | 14.5 | -4.5 | 11 | 17 | 2-1 / 0-2 | 1-2 / 0-2 | 0-3 / 1-1 | +17 / -17.5 | -23 / +3 |
| Mississippi St | 13 | 49 | 22(3) | | 18 | 10 | 2-1 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 1-2 | +7.7 / +0.3 | -9 / +6.5 |
Just like Texas and Ole Miss, this will be the first meeting between the Bulldogs and Sooners since Oklahoma joined the SEC. Oklahoma couldn't maintain the momentum of beating Texas, falling at home to Kentucky last week as a 6.5-point home favorite. Since beating South Carolina in mid-October last season, the Sooners have gone 2-6 against the spread in their last eight games as a favorite. Since beating UTEP to open the season, Oklahoma missed the point spread cover by 12.5 points against Michigan, 13.5 points against New Mexico, 14.5 points against Kentucky and 16.5 points against Georgia. Unfortunately, the Bulldogs do not appear fully-equipped to take advantage of Oklahoma’s struggles. Mississippi State QB Kamario Taylor is listed as questionable this week as he recovers from a toe injury. Taylor did not play in last week's loss to LSU, and while Jeff Lebby continues to paint an optimistic view toward Taylor's return, whispers around Starkville suggest he's not as close to a return as the Bulldogs are projecting. Parker Puckett went 16-of-26 for 121 yards with no touchdowns and an interception last week against the Tigers. Laying points with Oklahoma is a dangerous proposition right now, but if Mississippi State couldn't find the scoreboard against LSU last week, there's not much reason to believe Saturday's result will be drastically different (assuming Taylor remains out).
Play Oklahoma
10/19 2:28 PM PDT — Mississippi State QB Kamario Taylor is listed as questionable this week as he recovers from a toe injury. Taylor did not play in last week's loss to LSU, and while Jeff Lebby continues to paint an optimistic view toward Taylor's return, whispers around Starkville suggest he's not as close to a return as the Bulldogs are projecting.
| Oklahoma | 17.7 / 28.7 | -11 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Mississippi St | 18 / 37 | -19 | 16 | 11 | +6.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Oklahoma | 10-17 | Kentucky | -7 | 44.5 | 13-21 | Mississippi St | 10-17 | @ LSU | +17.5 | 56.5 | 0-31 |
| | 10-10 | Texas | +7.5 | 41 | 27-24 | | 10-03 | Alabama | +5.5 | 63 | 23-56 |
| | 09-26 | @ Georgia | +11 | 44 | 13-41 | | 09-26 | Missouri | -3.5 | 58.5 | 31-24 |
| Oklahoma |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-04-26 | UTEP | -41 | W | 51-0 | UN | 51.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 12.5 | -24 | W | 27-0 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Michigan | -5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 43.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 0-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | New Mexico | -21.5 | L | 14-6 | UN | 45.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -12.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia | 11 | L | 13-41 | OV | 44 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 7 | L | 0-28 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Texas | 7.5 | W | 27-24 | OV | 41 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 4 | L | 7-17 | OV | 20 |
| 10-17-26 | Kentucky | -7 | L | 13-21 | UN | 44.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 7.5 | -4 | L | 10-7 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mississippi St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UL Monroe | -28.5 | W | 62-13 | OV | 54.5 | -7.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 13.5 | -17 | W | 41-3 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Minnesota U | -1 | W | 38-13 | UN | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | W | 28-6 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ South Carolina | 3.5 | W | 41-34 | OV | 60 | 0.5 | L | 0-13 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 14-23 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri | -3.5 | W | 31-24 | UN | 58.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Alabama | 5.5 | L | 23-56 | OV | 63 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 17-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ LSU | 17.5 | L | 0-31 | UN | 56.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Tennessee Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Texas | 24 | -3 | 31.5 | -0.5 | 34 | 52 | 3-0 / 1-2 | 3-0 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 3-0 | +42.3 / -16.3 | -21 / +13.5 |
| Navy | 31 | 60 | 33(1) | | 30 | 28 | 2-0 / 0-4 | 1-1 / 1-3 | 2-0 / 2-2 | +17.5 / -5.3 | -17.5 / -1 |
North Texas has covered the number in each of the last two meetings since the Midshipmen joined The American Conference, including a 31-17 home win last season. The Mean Green coaching staff from last year now resides at Oklahoma State, although Neal Brown is doing a better-than-expected job in Denton so far this season. North Texas is coming off its bye week after a 4-2 start to the year, both straight-up and against the spread. Five of North Texas' six games have gone over the total. That bye week came at a nice time because Brown and the key members of the Mean Green defensive staff do not have much experience against the triple-option. Across his coaching career at Troy and West Virginia, the only notable game we could find on Brown's resume was against Army in the 2020 Liberty Bowl. Defensive coordinator Matt Powledge coached at Baylor over the last three seasons, and you typically don't see the triple option in that conference very often. Navy has lost four of its last five games, including a 38-34 loss at UTSA last week. We played against the Midshipmen in that contest, but the page has now flipped a little bit. In last week's write-up, we mentioned how quickly opposing teams in The American are learning how to defend the option now that they are seeing it on a somewhat-regular basis. Well, Navy needs to take advantage of the rare time when they are catching a conference opponent in an unfamiliar situation. Don't forget, this North Texas defense allowed Texas State to run for 337 yards a couple weeks ago. Look for the Midshipmen to flip the script.
Play Navy
| North Texas | 52.7 / 22.7 | +30 | 34 | 47 | -23 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Navy | 25.7 / 26 | -0.3 | 32 | 32 | +1.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| North Texas | 10-10 | Charlotte | -27.5 | 58 | 50-10 | Navy | 10-17 | @ Tex San A. | +5.5 | 53 | 34-38 |
| | 10-01 | @ Tulsa | -3 | 57 | 45-44 | | 10-10 | Tulsa | -3 | 47.5 | 34-26 |
| | 09-26 | Houston B. | -39 | 60 | 63-14 | | 10-03 | @ Air Force | +2.5 | 45.5 | 9-14 |
|
| 11-01-25 | Navy | 17 | 68.5 | 22 | 44/311 | 8/14/2/80 | 1/1 |
| North Texas | 31 | -6.5 | 22 | 45/190 | 19/24/0/234 | 0/0 |
| North Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-2-1 , O/U:1-2-2 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Indiana | 40 | W | 16-52 | OV | 57.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-14 | P | 14 | 24 | W | 6-24 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | UNLV | 3 | W | 44-6 | UN | 58.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-0 | P | 13 | 1.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas State | 3 | L | 35-49 | OV | 62.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 13.5 | 2 | W | 28-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Houston Baptist | -39 | W | 63-14 | OV | 60 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 35-14 | OV | |
| 10-01-26 | @ Tulsa | -3 | L | 45-44 | OV | 57 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | Charlotte | -27.5 | W | 50-10 | OV | 58 | -7 | PK | 10-3 | UN | 13.5 | -17 | W | 40-10 | OV | 31 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Navy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-5 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Towson | -31.5 | L | 42-15 | OV | 50.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-12 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | -4.5 | L | 30-38 | OV | 59.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | -3 | L | 7-31 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ UAB | -6.5 | L | 20-24 | UN | 50 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 13-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Air Force | 2.5 | L | 9-14 | UN | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Tulsa | -3 | W | 34-26 | OV | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 14-20 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | 5.5 | W | 34-38 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | W | 20-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| California | 20 | 55.5 | 27.5 | | 25 | 17 | 2-3 / 1-1 | 1-4 / 1-1 | 1-4 / 1-1 | -4.4 / -2.5 | -6.5 / +2 |
| SMU | 33 | -18.5 | 15(2) | -14.5 | 15 | 22 | 4-0 / 1-1 | 1-2-1 / 0-1-1 | 1-3 / 1-1 | +18.8 / -3.5 | -23.5 / 0 |
With Cal football GM Ron Rivera patrolling the sidelines and channeling Jim Irsay’s daughter with the Indianapolis Colts while looking over the shoulder of new head coach Tosh Lupoi during last week’s embarrassment in Berkeley vs. Wake Forest, it was a very uncomfortable evening at Strawberry Canyon. The Golden Bears look like they have perhaps regressed, if anything, from the last Jason Wilcox edition a year ago. Rivera’s glare towards Lupoi might have also been a reminder to get QB Jaren-Keawe Sagapolutele (returning to active duty from a concussion last Saturday, but not starting), who took up a lot of Cal’s NIL budget his past offseason, back on the field instead of Jackson Brousseau. The Colorado State transfer reminded all of his limited upside when being made to look feeble by the Deacs before JKS came on in the fourth quarter to lead the Bears’ only TD drive of the night (albeit in garbage time). As JKS now looms a flight risk in the next portal after his temporary demotion and a bumpy first month under OC Jordan Somerville (since demoted by Lupoi), expect him to be given every chance to shine in the next month in hopes of staying in the fold next season. It also shouldn’t be lost on Lupoi that perhaps the best game of JKS’s college career came last November at Berkeley against this same SMU, when he passed for 330 yards and a career-high four TDs in a rousing 38-35 Cal upset. Though still in the ACC race and a fringe candidate (along with many others) to make the 12-team playoffs, Rhett Lashlee’s Mustangs haven’t been overly impressive, failing to cover four straight (though some might have squeezed a spread W out of last week’s 23-13 win over Virginia), with recent struggles vs. the likes of Missouri State and Boston College qualifying SMU as a risky investment at this sort of price. A recent lack of a consistent infantry diversion (just 3.3 yards per carry the past three games) is putting a lot on the plate of QB Kevin Jennings, who has tossed half of his 16 TD passes vs. lightly-regarded UC Davis and Mizzou State but finding it much tougher vs. Power 4 foes. Note that for all of its schizophrenic tendencies, Cal has been able to squeeze out some results when least expected, with three outright road wins in the ACC (at BC, Louisville and Syracuse) since last season, and assuming a now-healthy JKS gets the nod at QB could keep this scoreline respectable.
Play Cal
| California | 21 / 33.3 | -12.3 | 26 | 22 | +7 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| SMU | 27.3 / 17.7 | +9.7 | 15 | 34 | -20.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 0-2-1 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 |
| California | 10-17 | Wake Fore. | +10 | 54 | 7-41 | SMU | 10-17 | Virginia | -10 | 51 | 23-13 |
| | 10-10 | Virginia . | +11 | 52 | 25-20 | | 10-03 | Boston Co. | -21.5 | 55.5 | 25-16 |
| | 10-03 | @ UNLV | PK | 51.5 | 31-39 | | 09-26 | Missouri . | -30.5 | 59.5 | 34-24 |
|
| 11-29-25 | SMU | 35 | -13.5 | 23 | 31/227 | 24/36/1/250 | 0/0 |
| California | 38 | 53 | 27 | 36/123 | 31/40/0/330 | 1/0 |
| 11-30-24 | California | 6 | 54.5 | 16 | 37/95 | 14/26/1/159 | 0/0 |
| SMU | 38 | -12.5 | 20 | 30/115 | 24/34/0/300 | 0/0 |
| California |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-6 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:3-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UCLA | 2.5 | L | 24-45 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Syracuse | 4 | W | 21-18 | UN | 57 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-12 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Wagner | -58.5 | L | 49-7 | UN | 65.5 | | W | 29-0 | OV | | | W | 39-7 | OV | |
| 09-25-26 | Clemson | 2.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 52 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ UNLV | 0 | L | 31-39 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 7-24 | OV | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | Virginia Tech | 11 | W | 25-20 | UN | 52 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-14 | UN | 27 |
| 10-17-26 | Wake Forest | 10 | L | 7-41 | UN | 54 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 6 | L | 0-34 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| SMU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-1 , PSR:1-3-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:0-5 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:6-0 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:1-3-1 |
| 09-07-26 | @ Florida State | -3 | PK | 27-24 | UN | 52.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -1.5 | W | 17-10 | P | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | UC Davis | -32.5 | W | 56-10 | OV | 59 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Louisville | 3 | L | 31-41 | OV | 57.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri State | -30.5 | L | 34-24 | UN | 59.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 14.5 | -19.5 | L | 14-10 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Boston College | -21.5 | L | 25-16 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 6-10 | OV | 13.5 | -13 | L | 13-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Virginia | -10 | PK | 23-13 | UN | 51 | -3.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-24-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Old Dominion | 17 | 44 | 46 | | 40 | 38 | 1-3 / 1-2 | 0-4 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 2-1 | -4 / -16 | -8.5 / +9.5 |
| Louisiana Tech | 35 | -13.5 | 33.5(1) | -13.5 | 37 | 51 | 3-0 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 3-0 | 3-0 / 2-1 | +25.7 / -8 | -16 / +14 |
This will be the first meeting between the Monarchs and Bulldogs since Old Dominion earned a 23-20 home win in October 2021. The Monarchs had a couple extra days to prep for this one after falling at home to Georgia Southern last Thursday. That loss dropped ODU to 2-5 straight-up, 1-6 against the spread. Old Dominion's lone win over an FBS-level opponent this season came at App State in a game that was played in tropical depression conditions. With former QB Colton Joseph now at Wisconsin, the Monarchs haven't been able to get anything going on offense. Since beating FCS-level Norfolk State in the opener, ODU has scored an average of 15.5 points per game. That 23-15 final score against the Eagles last week was pretty flattering for the Monarchs considering Georgia Southern out-gained them by 139 yards with a 28-16 advantage in first downs. Louisiana Tech has won each of its last three games, including a 24-0 shut-out win over UL-Monroe last week. That impressive defensive performance broke a string of five-straight "over" results in Bulldogs' games. We gave Old Dominion a stiff downgrade this week, but truthfully, it might not be far enough. Excluding that game against the Mountaineers played in terrible conditions, the Monarchs failed to cover the spread in their other three Sun Belt games by an average of 18.5 points per game.
Play Louisiana Tech
| Old Dominion | 11.7 / 22.7 | -11 | 40 | 40 | +4.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Louisiana Tech | 29 / 20 | +9 | 37 | 39 | -5.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Old Dominion | 10-15 | Georgia S. | +3 | 45 | 15-23 | Louisiana Tech | 10-17 | @ UL Monroe | -13.5 | 56 | 24-0 |
| | 10-10 | @ Appalachi. | +9 | 46 | 10-3 | | 10-10 | Louisiana | -3 | 48 | 32-31 |
| | 10-03 | @ Georgia S. | +1 | 51.5 | 10-42 | | 10-03 | Army | PK | 46.5 | 31-29 |
| Old Dominion |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-5 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-1-1 |
| 09-05-26 | Norfolk St | -41.5 | L | 31-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 18 | L | 21-44 | OV | 47.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | L | 6-34 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | East Carolina | -2.5 | L | 17-20 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | James Madison | 7 | L | 20-46 | OV | 44 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | L | 17-30 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia State | 1 | L | 10-42 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Appalachian St | 9 | W | 10-3 | UN | 46 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6 | W | 0-0 | UN | 23 |
| 10-15-26 | Georgia Southern | 3 | L | 15-23 | UN | 45 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-16 | P | 23 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-3 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:1-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northwestern State | -44.5 | W | 80-6 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 63-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ LSU | 34.5 | W | 14-45 | OV | 55 | 9.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 21.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Baylor | 20.5 | W | 19-36 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 11.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Army | 0 | W | 31-29 | OV | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | W | 14-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Louisiana | -3 | L | 32-31 | OV | 48 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ UL Monroe | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 56 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 29 |
| 10-24-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas A&M | 17 | 49 | 15.5 | | 12 | 55 | 4-1 / 0-2 | 3-2 / 0-2 | 2-3 / 0-2 | +27.2 / -25 | -26 / +6.5 |
| Alabama | 27 | -13.5 | 6(3) | -12.5 | 6 | 14 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +20 / +15 | -15 / -7.5 |
This will be the first meeting between the Aggies and Crimson Tide since Alabama's 26-20 road win in College Station in October 2023. For what it's worth (both coaching staffs have changed since the last meeting), five of the last six meetings have gone over the total. Texas A&M had a much-needed get-right game against FCS-level Citadel last week. That was clearly a "go through the motions" game for the Aggies, but even still, you'd generally like to see a little bit more from the A&M passing attack. Marcel Reed went 8-for-13 for 130 yards and one touchdown. Did the Aggies really need to prove that they can run for 264 yards against The Citadel? Probably not. We would have liked to see a little more from A&M's passing game in that exhibition, considering the stats that Reed has produced thus far. Much like Texas, Alabama built a nice cushion in the resume early in the season with convincing wins over Kentucky, Florida State, South Carolina and Mississippi State. That cushion has quickly disappeared after back-to-back losses to Georgia and Tennessee. Kalen DeBoer's seat in Tuscaloosa has gotten uncomfortable once again, and we can't help but shake our head as to why the Crimson Tide administration felt the need to give him a contract extension. DeBoer is a perfectly good coach and several teams around the country would welcome him, but who was knocking on Alabama's door after going 20-8 over the past two seasons that forced the Crimson Tide to lock him into a seven-year extension?! There's no going back now. DeBoer isn't going anywhere, so they need to figure out how to make this work. We have major doubts about Texas A&M's offense right now, but the Aggies' defense is good enough to keep them within two scores.
Play Texas A&M
| Texas A&M | 27 / 11.3 | +15.7 | 15 | 32 | -18.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Alabama | 27.7 / 23 | +4.7 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Texas A&M | 10-17 | Citadel | -46.5 | 56 | 41-0 | Alabama | 10-17 | @ Tennessee. | -7.5 | 50 | 10-26 |
| | 10-10 | @ Missouri | +4.5 | 50.5 | 6-27 | | 10-10 | Georgia | -2.5 | 52 | 17-20 |
| | 10-03 | Arkansas | -13.5 | 51 | 34-7 | | 10-03 | @ Mississip. | -5.5 | 63 | 56-23 |
| Texas A&M |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Missouri State | -38.5 | W | 50-0 | UN | 53.5 | -10.5 | L | 9-0 | UN | 14 | -24.5 | L | 19-0 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona State | -14.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 51.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kentucky | -17 | L | 21-31 | OV | 48.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -9.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ LSU | 8 | L | 6-35 | UN | 52.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas | -13.5 | W | 34-7 | UN | 51 | -3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 9.5 | -7 | W | 24-7 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Missouri | 4.5 | L | 6-27 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 3-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Citadel | -46.5 | L | 41-0 | UN | 56 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 10-24-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | East Carolina | -28 | W | 48-10 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -16.5 | W | 38-7 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kentucky | -9 | W | 45-17 | OV | 47.5 | -3 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -5.5 | L | 13-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida State | -18 | L | 50-36 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 26-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Carolina | -11.5 | W | 49-18 | OV | 53 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -7 | W | 35-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Mississippi St | -5.5 | W | 56-23 | OV | 63 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 28-17 | OV | 31.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Georgia | -2.5 | L | 17-20 | UN | 52 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-10 | UN | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tennessee U | -7.5 | L | 10-26 | UN | 50 | -2.5 | L | 0-9 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 10-12 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Chattanooga | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Vanderbilt | 17 | 51 | 21.5 | | 19 | 25 | 3-2 / 0-2 | 1-4 / 2-0 | 4-1 / 1-1 | -2.6 / -15 | -9.5 / +18 |
| Kentucky | 27 | -9.5 | 14.5(2) | -9 | 18 | 13 | 3-1 / 3-0 | 3-1 / 3-0 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +7.3 / +6.3 | -6.5 / +9 |
Vanderbilt has covered the number in five of the last six meetings, including a pair of outright wins over the last two seasons. The Commodores racked up 604 total yards against Kentucky's defense last year en route to a 45-17 home win in Nashville. Something tells us first-year head coach Will Stein is not going to let that happen again. Stein dedicated his early-week press conference to praising Vanderbilt and head coach Clark Lea. "Last time I checked, Vanderbilt embarrassed Kentucky last year so we know what they are able to do in all three phases." Kentucky has won-and-covered each of its last five games after last week's road win at Oklahoma. Save for a terrible fourth quarter against Alabama where the wheels completely fell off, the Wildcats probably should be 7-0 against the number this season. Last week's strong defensive effort against the Sooners broke a string of five-straight "over" results in Kentucky's games. Vanderbilt is also on a 5-1 run to the over, but freshman QB Jared Curtis is still going through a lot of growing pains. Curtis has thrown seven interceptions over his last four starts, including a pick-six that eventually sealed the Commodores' loss to Arkansas last week. After running for 64 yards against NC State and 46 yards against Auburn in September, Curtis hasn't been able to use his legs in recent weeks. With Blaze Berlowitz injured, Vanderbilt doesn't have a safety blanket behind Curtis anymore. Coach Lea allowed Diego Pavia to play with reckless abandon over the past few years, but it feels like he needs to slow the game down for Curtis as he tries to navigate his first season in the SEC.
Play the Under
| Vanderbilt | 17.3 / 40.3 | -23 | 19 | 12 | +10 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Kentucky | 30.3 / 27 | +3.3 | 18 | 14 | +6 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Vanderbilt | 10-17 | Arkansas | -5.5 | 48.5 | 21-31 | Kentucky | 10-17 | @ Oklahoma | +7 | 44.5 | 21-13 |
| | 10-10 | Mississip. | +9.5 | 55 | 17-52 | | 10-10 | LSU | +9 | 50.5 | 35-34 |
| | 10-03 | @ Georgia | +25.5 | 50 | 14-38 | | 10-03 | @ South Car. | +2.5 | 53 | 35-34 |
|
| 11-22-25 | Kentucky | 17 | 54 | 18 | 19/31 | 29/49/3/284 | 0/0 |
| Vanderbilt | 45 | -7 | 29 | 25/65 | 37/44/1/539 | 0/0 |
| Vanderbilt |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-5 , PSR:1-5 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Austin Peay | -28.5 | L | 28-9 | UN | 57.5 | | L | 5-6 | OV | | | W | 15-9 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Delaware | -20.5 | L | 35-26 | OV | 53.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -11.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | NC State | -3 | W | 35-31 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Auburn | 10 | W | 15-21 | UN | 54.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia | 25.5 | W | 14-38 | OV | 50 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 15.5 | W | 14-21 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | Mississippi | 9.5 | L | 17-52 | OV | 55 | 3.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 5.5 | L | 3-42 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas | -5.5 | L | 21-31 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | L | 14-14 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kentucky |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:4-1-1 , O/U:4-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Youngstown St | -22.5 | W | 45-13 | UN | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama | 9 | L | 17-45 | OV | 47.5 | 3 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 5.5 | W | 17-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas A&M | 17 | W | 31-21 | OV | 48.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Alabama | -20.5 | W | 45-21 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Carolina | 2.5 | W | 35-34 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-20 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | LSU | 9 | W | 35-34 | OV | 50.5 | 3 | PK | 7-10 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-17 | OV | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oklahoma | 7 | W | 21-13 | UN | 44.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 7.5 | 4 | W | 7-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Boise State | 33 | -14.5 | 20 | -16 | 20 | 27 | 3-0 / 2-1 | 1-2 / 2-1 | 3-0 / 2-1 | +17 / +8.3 | -19 / +3 |
| Washington State | 24 | 52.5 | 38(2) | | 36 | 28 | 1-2 / 0-4 | 2-1 / 3-1 | 2-1 / 1-3 | +3.7 / -15 | -10 / +16 |
So, where had Washington State head coach Kirby Moore been hiding redshirt freshman QB Owen Eshelman all season? Tired of seeing the Washington State offense sputter endlessly with UC Davis transfer Caden Pinnick, Moore decided to make the switch in the cockpit to Eshelman before kickoff last week at Oregon State. While most of his damage was done well after the Beavers moved to a 27-3 lead and began to play loose on defense, 425 yards of total offense is still 425 yards, whenever the stats were compiled. Along the way, Esheleman did a pretty good impersonation of former Coug QB John Mateer when scrambling out of the pocket for 136 rush yards as Eshelman would lead four TD drives in the last 32 minutes at Corvallis, quite something when considering how Wazzu had scored only one solitary TD across the previous two games combined vs. Utah State and Fresno State with Pinnick at the controls of a yard-by-yard offense. So, unless Eshelman’s effort was an outlier vs. a team on cruise control, it might be fair to say the Cougs rate a puncher’s chance the rest of the way this season. Though off of a bye and with only Texas State and a woeful Colorado State on deck, there’s no reason for Spencer Danielson’s Boise to overlook this trip to Pullman, especially with the stakes (a potential playoff berth, like in 2024, if the Broncos keep winning) so high. The Broncos, however, haven’t quite been able to shake the likes of South Dakota, Utah State and Fresno until the late going in the past month, and Danielson looks like he might be willing to slow the pace a bit with an infantry that seems glad to play some smashmouth with the 1-2 punch of Dylan Riley and Sire Gaines, who each topped 100 rushing yards in the recent win at Fresno, and Riley doing a pretty good Ashton Jeanty impersonation as he has risen to fourth nationally in rushing (835 yards). Which has provided a nice diversion for QB Maddux Madsen and helped him to 13 TD passes and no picks thus far. Still, noting Cougar spread successes as a dog vs. Washington, Arizona and Utah State (and for those who waited until late in the week, Oregon State last Saturday as well), not sure how far the Broncos can extend this margin.
Play Washington State
| Boise State | 35.7 / 18.7 | +17 | 20 | 34 | -12 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Washington State | 17.3 / 30.3 | -13 | 37 | 32 | +7 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Boise State | 10-10 | @ Fresno St. | -9 | 48.5 | 38-31 | Washington State | 10-17 | @ Oregon St. | +19 | 52 | 30-48 |
| | 10-03 | Utah State | -19.5 | 51 | 37-18 | | 10-09 | @ Utah State | +4 | 44 | 16-17 |
| | 09-26 | @ Western M. | -8 | 50.5 | 32-7 | | 10-03 | Fresno St. | -2 | 45 | 6-26 |
| Boise State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-1 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Oregon | 25.5 | W | 27-34 | OV | 53 | 7 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 14.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Memphis | -9.5 | W | 38-20 | OV | 55 | -3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -6 | L | 17-20 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | South Dakota | -28.5 | L | 38-24 | OV | 61.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-14 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Western Michigan | -8 | W | 32-7 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 8-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4.5 | W | 15-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Utah State | -19.5 | L | 37-18 | OV | 51 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -11 | W | 28-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Fresno State | -9 | L | 38-31 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 15-13 | OV | 9.5 | -4.5 | W | 25-20 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Washington State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-6 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:4-2 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-2-1 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Washington U | 24 | W | 10-24 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 14 | W | 0-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kansas State | 17.5 | L | 7-34 | UN | 48.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10 | 10 | PK | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Duquesne | -38.5 | W | 48-7 | OV | 52 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Arizona U | 11 | W | 24-34 | OV | 47 | 3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Fresno State | -2 | L | 6-26 | UN | 45 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-6 | UN | 22.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ Utah State | 4 | W | 16-17 | UN | 44 | 0.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 16-3 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oregon State | 19 | W | 30-48 | OV | 52 | 6.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 10.5 | L | 10-27 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Diego State | 35 | -1 | 40 | -4.5 | 35 | 27 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 0-3 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +6.3 / -31.7 | -6.5 / +10 |
| Colorado State | 29 | 57.5 | 47.5(3) | | 41 | 33 | 2-2 / 0-2 | 2-2 / 0-1-1 | 4-0 / 2-0 | +2 / -26.5 | +0.5 / +15 |
As those willing to audition for the thankless role of being Jim Mora’s defensive coordinator has thus far netted only a few rodeo clowns, test pilots and handful of other risk-takers, Colorado State’s stop unit continues to plumb new depths. After Tyson Summers was removed by Mora from the DC role mid-game a few weeks ago vs. Oregon State, defensive line coach Kenny McClendon temporarily took over play-calling duties last week at Texas State, but after surrendering 66 points in just three quarters vs. the Bobcats, McClendon is reportedly contemplating witness protection this week as CSU’s defense has now surrendered 59, 56 and 66 points (sheesh!) on the trot and has fallen to dead last nationally in total defense, a staggering nearly 50 yards per game worse (really!) than the next-closest competitor, West Virginia. Which among other things is prompting calls for hoops coach Ali Farokmanesh to step in (after all, the basketball Rams often don’t allow that many points) and give it a go as Mora's DC. Moreover, allowing GJ Kinne’s Bobcats to emulate Tom Osborne’s old Nebraska and post a school-record 503 rush yards (!) last week was one more embarrassment added to the litany of recent woes for the CSU defense. Any positives for the Rams? Well, there is word from Fort Collins that early-season starting QB and Oklahoma State transfer Hauss Henjy might finally be ready to return from the hamstring pull that has kept him out since mid-September, though offense hasn’t been the Rams’ problem with backup QB K’Saan Farrar, who moved with Mora from UConn in the offseason, generating ample horsepower in recent games. Another more relevant saving grace this week might be the visit of risk-averse San Diego State, which won’t be mistaken for the long-ago Air Coryell attacks that first made the Aztecs famous. It might be a plus for head coach Sean Lewis, however, that QB Jayden Denegal is questionable with an ankle injury that forced him out last week vs. Fresno State, with freshman Stone Sanders offering just a bit more of an aerial threat as SDSU pulled out a 26-23 win to stay on the fringe of the new-Pac-12 race and keep bowl hopes alive. While it’s worth noting that all of the teams (UTSA, Oregon State, Texas State) that have recently bombed the Rams have considerably more firepower than the Aztecs, the degree of depravity on Mora’s defense plus rumors of discontent in the CSU locker room make the Rams and awfully chancy investment at the moment...even if QB Sanders makes his first college start for the visitors.
Play San Diego State
10/19 2:29 PM PDT — Colorado State QB Hauss Hejny is expected to be available this week after missing the Rams' last three games. Hejny was reportedly available in an emergency role last week against Texas State behind K'Saan Farrar, so all signs point to him being good-to-go this week after recovering from a hamstring injury.
10/20 12:16 AM PDT — San Diego State QB Jayden Denegal suffered an ankle injury in last week's win over Fresno State and was unable to finish that contest. Denegal has started every game for the Aztecs over the past two seasons, so San Diego State turned to frosh Stone Sanders to bring home the 26-23 win over the Bulldogs at Snapdragon last Saturday.
| San Diego State | 23.7 / 39.3 | -15.7 | 38 | 29 | +10.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Colorado State | 32.7 / 60.3 | -27.7 | 39 | 31 | +12 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| San Diego State | 10-17 | Fresno St. | +6.5 | 46.5 | 26-23 | Colorado State | 10-15 | @ Texas Sta. | +15.5 | 69.5 | 27-66 |
| | 10-10 | @ Oregon St. | +14.5 | 52.5 | 14-66 | | 10-03 | Oregon St. | +7 | 61 | 26-56 |
| | 10-03 | Texas Sta. | +10 | 57.5 | 31-29 | | 09-26 | @ Tex San A. | +14 | 56.5 | 45-59 |
|
| 10-03-25 | Colorado State | 24 | 40.5 | 22 | 35/149 | 18/30/0/206 | 0/0 |
| San Diego State | 45 | -4.5 | 24 | 47/282 | 14/18/0/259 | 0/0 |
| San Diego State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:2-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Portland St | -38.5 | L | 53-20 | OV | 61 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | W | 29-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ UCLA | 13.5 | L | 10-28 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | James Madison | -3 | L | 13-26 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 0-19 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Toledo | 2.5 | L | 16-41 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Texas State | 10 | W | 31-29 | OV | 57.5 | 2.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 13.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 29 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon State | 14.5 | L | 14-66 | OV | 52.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 8.5 | L | 7-38 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Fresno State | 6.5 | W | 26-23 | OV | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 16-10 | OV | 23 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Colorado State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-3-1 , O/U:6-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:5-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:4-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Wyoming | -2.5 | W | 35-13 | OV | 46 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9 | -0.5 | W | 14-6 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern Utah | -20.5 | W | 58-24 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 17-7 | OV | | | W | 48-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | BYU | 17.5 | L | 23-41 | OV | 55 | 4.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 11.5 | 9.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | 14 | PK | 45-59 | OV | 56.5 | 3.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | L | 21-35 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Oregon State | 7 | L | 26-56 | OV | 61 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 4 | L | 14-35 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-15-26 | @ Texas State | 15.5 | L | 27-66 | OV | 69.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14.5 | 10 | L | 21-45 | OV | 36.5 |
| 10-24-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah State | 27 | 59 | 38 | | 40 | 38 | 2-1 / 0-3 | 1-2 / 2-1 | 0-3 / 1-2 | 0 / -18 | -7.5 / +24.5 |
| Texas State | 34 | -14.5 | 32(2) | -8 | 32 | 44 | 3-1 / 0-2 | 3-1 / 0-2 | 3-1 / 2-0 | +25.3 / -27 | -12.5 / +10 |
While it was fun pretending to be Darrell Royal’s old Texas Wishbone last Thursday night and roll up 503 yards on the ground, it must be noted that Texas State was playing against a Colorado State defense that has been disguised as traffic cones this season. It’s doubtful Utah State will prove as yielding, especially as Aggies’ head coach Bronco Mendenhall is a disciple of sage defensive mastermind Rocky Long. Indeed, this sort of underdog role has suited the Aggies just fine since Mendenhall arrived in Logan last season, covering eight of ten when getting points. Off of a bye, the rested Cache Valley brigade has also survived a tough early-season slate with wins in two of three to keep bowl hopes flickering, not bad since it looked for a while that Mendenhall might not have a viable answer at QB, especially after a mistake-filled loss to Big Sky Idaho State in the opener. Yet the Aggies have since been able to get serviceable work from ex-Virginia dual-threat pilot Grady Brosterhous, who has been doing just enough with his arm (7 TD passes) and legs (81 rush yards vs. Washington, 89 rush yards vs. Troy) to keep the offense viable. The Ags will need all of that because GJ Kinne’s Bobcats have demonstrated Sonny Liston-like KO power, twice eclipsing 60 points (including last week’s 66 vs. CSU) and hitting 49 another time with the nation’s top-ranked offense, at a blistering 562 yards per game as orchestrated by vet QB Brad Jackson, who has accounted for over 1,800 yards via ground and air and been responsible for 18 TDs as well in just half-a-season of work. Texas State isn’t perfect, however, only 3-3 straight-up with the nation's 125th-ranked defense and ranking a lowly 124th in turnover margin with ten giveaways, including several costly mistakes in a recent loss at San Diego State. Remember, the Ags’ opponent list since last season includes four games on the road vs. Power 4 foes (covering three of those) and another pair vs. Boise State, both of those covers for Mendenhall as well. Thus, if nothing else, the Aggies don’t figure to be spooked by the Bobcats or the biggest Buc-ee's in Texas (128 gas pumps!) very nearby off I-35 in San Marcos.
Play Utah State
| Utah State | 18.7 / 21 | -2.3 | 40 | 32 | +4 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Texas State | 52.7 / 22.7 | +30 | 32 | 44 | -18.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Utah State | 10-09 | Washingto. | -4 | 44 | 17-16 | Texas State | 10-15 | Colorado . | -15.5 | 69.5 | 66-27 |
| | 10-03 | @ Boise Sta. | +19.5 | 51 | 18-37 | | 10-03 | @ San Diego. | -10 | 57.5 | 29-31 |
| | 09-26 | Troy | -3 | 48 | 21-10 | | 09-26 | Incarnate. | -30 | 66 | 63-10 |
| Utah State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:1-5-0 | 1Q SUR:1-3 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:3-2-0 | 1H SUR:0-6 , PSR:1-4 , O/U:1-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Idaho State | -15.5 | L | 17-29 | UN | 58.5 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | L | 10-16 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Washington U | 28 | W | 14-16 | UN | 55.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 17 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Utah | 26.5 | L | 0-33 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-16 | OV | 13.5 | 15.5 | L | 0-26 | UN | 30 |
| 09-26-26 | Troy | -3 | W | 21-10 | UN | 48 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Boise State | 19.5 | W | 18-37 | OV | 51 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 11 | L | 10-28 | OV | 27 |
| 10-09-26 | Washington State | -4 | L | 17-16 | UN | 44 | -0.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 3-16 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:5-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:2-2-1 | 1H SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-2 , O/U:3-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Texas | 29.5 | L | 7-59 | OV | 61.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-14 | P | 14 | 17.5 | L | 7-28 | OV | 33 |
| 09-12-26 | Tex San Antonio | -1.5 | L | 26-31 | UN | 65.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 14 | -0.5 | W | 17-7 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Texas | -3 | W | 49-35 | OV | 62.5 | -0.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 13.5 | -2 | L | 28-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Incarnate Word | -30 | W | 63-10 | OV | 66 | | W | 28-7 | OV | | | W | 42-10 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ San Diego State | -10 | L | 29-31 | OV | 57.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 29 |
| 10-15-26 | Colorado State | -15.5 | W | 66-27 | OV | 69.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14.5 | -10 | W | 45-21 | OV | 36.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Dakota State | 13 | 39 | 31 | | 29 | 41 | 4-0 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 1-2 | +26.5 / +7 | -20 / -10 |
| New Mexico | 24 | -4.5 | 25.5(2) | -7.5 | 28 | 41 | 3-0 / 2-1 | 3-0 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 1-2 | +49.3 / +9 | -25.5 / -1.5 |
Anyone in the summer who pegged this clash as having potential playoff implications might have been hanging out with the one fellow who predicted Kentucky to win the SEC at the July Media Days in Tampa (hey...we know that guy!). Of course, it wasn’t until late June that we even knew North Dakota State would be eligible for either the playoff, Mountain West title, or a bowl game (of which the Bison have now officially qualified), though in truth chances are now a bit remote for the playoff after a recent loss at UNLV. Not for host New Mexico, however, which has a real shot to crash the 12-team party before some big bucks offer comes to take head coach Jason Eck out of the Mountain West. As it stands, the Lobos are the best thing going in Albuquerque along with the green chile cheeseburgers at the Owl Café, with a close loss at Oklahoma the only blemish. Facing and competing almost equally with an SEC entry like the Sooners (disappointing as OU might be this season) gives New Mexico a leg up on NDSU, which has capitalized on a soft slate in its FBS debut and failed its one semi-difficult test at Las Vegas en route. While functional with low-risk senior QB Nathan Hayes, the Bison have a pedestrian look on offense at times, and Hayes melted down against the one defense that seriously challenged him when Dan Mullen’s Rebels picked off three passes in that 13-7 UNLV win two weeks ago. Any similar carelessness by Hayes figures to have dire consequences against Eck’s defense with its voracious appetite for takeaways (its 21 leads the nation), and that’s no misprint when reading that New Mexico leads the nation in scoring defense at a mere 10.5 points per game. Like a proper counterpuncher, the Lobos usually wait to strike until the defense provides the field position, eventually breaking big plays like long TD runs in the fourth quarter last week at Hawaii by QB Tao Fa’avae and RB Scottre Humphrey that finally put away the Rainbow Warriors in Honolulu. We suspect, however, that having faced and competed mostly evenly with four different Big Ten or SEC foes since last season has more prepared the Lobos for this sort of showdown. Eck’s 13-5 spread mark since his arrival a year ago doesn’t hurt, either.
Play the Under
10/20 6:51 AM PDT — New Mexico is running a bit low on QBs, with returning starter Jack Layne sidelined since the outset of the season and designated-runner James Laubstein suffering a leg injury in last week's win over Hawaii. Though sophomore Toa Fa'avae threw two interceptions and was sacked twice last week in Honolulu, he did contribute a key 21-yard TD run to put the Lobos ahead for good in the fourth quarter, and as the case much of the season, he should continue to share snaps with Oregon transfer Luke Moga moving forward.
| North Dakota State | 22 / 10 | +12 | 28 | 38 | -11.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| New Mexico | 41.3 / 11.7 | +29.7 | 27 | 44 | -16.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| North Dakota State | 10-17 | Nevada | -15 | 42.5 | 31-17 | New Mexico | 10-17 | @ Hawaii | -14.5 | 46.5 | 21-10 |
| | 10-10 | @ UNLV | -3 | 48 | 7-13 | | 10-03 | UTEP | -23.5 | 47.5 | 61-7 |
| | 10-03 | Wyoming | -17 | 44 | 28-0 | | 09-26 | @ New Mexic. | -11.5 | 47.5 | 42-18 |
| North Dakota State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-1 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:2-4-0 | 1H SUR:6-0 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Jacksonville St | -6.5 | W | 33-7 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -3.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Fordham | -41.5 | L | 38-0 | UN | 54 | | W | 3-0 | OV | | | W | 17-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Air Force | -2 | W | 38-32 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 28-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Sacramento State | -24.5 | L | 31-10 | UN | 50.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 10.5 | -14.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Wyoming | -17 | W | 28-0 | UN | 44 | -4.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -10 | W | 17-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ UNLV | -3 | L | 7-13 | UN | 48 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Nevada | -15 | L | 31-17 | OV | 42.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7.5 | W | 19-11 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Mexico |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-1 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-1 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:2-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-1 , O/U:0-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Central Michigan | -11 | W | 38-7 | UN | 47.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Mercyhurst | -42.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 54.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Oklahoma | 21.5 | W | 6-14 | UN | 45.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 12.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | @ New Mexico State | -11.5 | W | 42-18 | OV | 47.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -7 | W | 14-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | UTEP | -23.5 | W | 61-7 | OV | 47.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -14 | W | 21-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Hawaii | -14.5 | L | 21-10 | UN | 46.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| KEY |
| Score | The predicted score for an event |
| PR | The team's Power Rating |
| GS Line | The GoldSheet line, calculated using each team's Power Rating. |
| Avg. PR | The average Power Rating of a team over the course of the season. |
| Avg. OPR | The average of a team's opponent Power Rating on the day that they played. |
| SUR (H/A) | The team's straight-up-record, both at home and on the road. |
| ATS (H/A) | The team's record against-the-spread. |
| O/U (H/A) | The team's over-under record. |
| Pts. Diff. (H/A) | The team's +/- point differential. |
| Avg. Ln. (H/A) | The average line the team has had over the course of the season. |
| PF/PA | The average points a team has scored and allowed. |
| FD | The total number of first downs. |
| RA/RY | The number of rushing attempts and yards. |
| PC/PA/I/PY | The number of passing completions, attempts, interceptions and yards. |
| RA/RY | The number of fumbles and fumbles lost. |
COPYRIGHT 2026 © THE GOLD SHEET
ALL RIGHT RESERVED.