September 17th
| Syracuse | 24 | 51 | 30.5 | | 29 | 25 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +30 / - | -20 / - |
| Pittsburgh U | 30 | -10.5 | 18(2) | -14.5 | 18 | 26 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +25 / - | -12 / - |
Pitt is 7-1 straight-up, 6-2 against the spread over the last eight meetings in this ACC matchup. The Panthers earned a 30-13 road win at Syracuse last season. Six of the last seven games have stayed under the total. So who is playing Jekyll and who is playing Hyde this week? Two of the not-so-trustworthy teams in the ACC will take the field on Thursday. One week after beating a solid MAC entry in Miami (Oh) by 45 points, Pitt played one of the ugliest games of the weekend in a 12-7 win over UCF. Weather was a factor at Acrisure Stadium, but nonetheless, the Panthers were only able to generate 4.4 yards per play while going 5-for-18 at home against a Knights' defense that isn't projected to be very good. Neither Pitt nor UCF can put TOO much blame on the weather because there wasn't a single turnover in that contest. Syracuse isn't exactly a model of consistency, either, as the Orange lost at home 21-18 to Cal despite out-gaining the Bears by nearly 200 yards. Unlike Pitt, turnovers were the main concern in upstate New York as Steve Angeli threw three interceptions against the Bears. Syracuse finished with 15 penalties for 132 yards. Ultimately, when you've got two teams that each rank low on the trust meter, it's hard to ignore a ten-point head start. Even with his turnover struggles, Angeli threw for over 300 yards and three Syracuse receivers each finished with 70+ yards through the air. Even if Pitt takes a decent lead, the Orange offense is good enough to knock on the back door.
Play Syracuse
| Syracuse | 42 / 12 | +30 | 29 | 40 | -20 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Pittsburgh U | 35.5 / 10.5 | +25 | 18 | 30 | -12 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Syracuse | 09-12 | California | -4 | 57 | 18-21 | Pittsburgh U | 09-12 | Central F. | -7 | 55 | 12-7 |
| | 09-05 | New Hamps. | -35.5 | 56.5 | 66-3 | | 09-05 | Miami Ohio | -16.5 | 48 | 59-14 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 10-18-25 | Pittsburgh U | 30 | -9.5 | 16 | 43/117 | 13/24/1/143 | 0/0 |
| Syracuse | 13 | 54.5 | 13 | 32/76 | 18/35/3/136 | 0/0 |
| 10-24-24 | Syracuse | 13 | 62.5 | 23 | 29/6 | 35/64/5/321 | 0/0 |
| Pittsburgh U | 41 | -4.5 | 13 | 22/73 | 16/22/0/144 | 1/0 |
| Syracuse |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | New Hampshire | -35.5 | W | 66-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | California | -4 | L | 18-21 | UN | 57 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 12-7 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-17-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Pittsburgh U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Miami Ohio | -16.5 | W | 59-14 | OV | 48 | -3.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 10 | -9.5 | W | 31-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Central Florida | -7 | L | 12-7 | UN | 55 | -3 | PK | 3-0 | UN | 13 | -4.5 | W | 12-0 | UN | 28 |
| 09-17-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Bucknell | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-02-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
September 18th
| Tech Play | | Updated: 09/15 6:06 pm |
| Miami Florida | 24 | -20 | 4.5 | -17 | 5 | 55 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +70 / +39 | -59.5 / -24.5 |
| Wake Forest | 38 | 55.5 | 22.5(1) | | 23 | 31 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +22 / +2 | -28 / -2.5 |
Surprisingly, these ACC foes have only met one time in the last 12 years. The 'Canes beat the Deacs 42-14 in Miami in November 2024. Miami had some extra time to prep for this one after handling FCS-level Florida A&M on Thursday. Sophomore receiver Malachi Toney continues to show why he's a highlight waiting to happen every time he touches the ball, generating 330 receiving yards on 16 receptions with four touchdowns in his first two games. Toney and QB Darian Mensah draw most of the headlines in Coral Gables, but there is an under-the-radar storyline brewing for the 'Canes. Miami was missing its top three cornerbacks last week against the Rattlers as Xavier Lucas joined OJ Frederique Jr. and Ja'Boree Antoine on the sidelines. Starting safety Bryce Fitzgerald was forced to play cornerback and freshman JJ Dunnigan was thrust into the starting safety role. You can get away with that against Florida A&M. You might not be able to get away with that against Gio Lopez. Wake Forest's experienced gunslinger will be looking to share some of the spotlight in this stand-alone contest. The Deacs are playing with some confidence after last week's overtime win at Purdue. If there are any signs of fatigue, they are likely to show up on the defensive end. Dating back to the end of last season, Wake Forest's last six games have all gone over the total. Those six games cleared their respective closing totals by an average of 15.2 points per game.
Play the Over
| Miami Florida | 61 / 6.5 | +54.5 | 5 | 42 | -42 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Wake Forest | 38 / 26 | +12 | 24 | 40 | -15.5 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Miami Florida | 09-10 | Florida A. | -59.5 | 66.5 | 77-7 | Wake Forest | 09-12 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | 51.5 | 38-36 |
| | 09-04 | @ Stanford | -24.5 | 46.5 | 45-6 | | 09-03 | Akron | -28 | 50.5 | 38-16 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 11-23-24 | Wake Forest | 14 | 67 | 12 | 40/94 | 9/17/1/99 | 1/1 |
| Miami Florida | 42 | -23.5 | 27 | 32/228 | 27/38/1/280 | 1/1 |
| Miami Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Stanford | -24.5 | W | 45-6 | OV | 46.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | -14 | W | 28-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-10-26 | Florida A&M | -59.5 | W | 77-7 | OV | 66.5 | -16.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 17.5 | -36.5 | W | 49-0 | OV | 38.5 |
| 09-18-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wake Forest |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Akron | -28 | L | 38-16 | OV | 50.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -16.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | L | 38-36 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -1 | W | 17-10 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-18-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Merrimack College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Houston U | 17 | 52.5 | 17 | | 18 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | +42 / - | -36.5 / - |
| Texas Tech | 28 | -8 | 10(3) | -10 | 9 | 36 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +23 / +11 | -45 / -26 |
How far is too far? That is the question that bettors and oddsmakers are asking in this Big XII showdown in the Lone Star State. With a schedule that doesn't present many obstacles, bettors have seemingly had this one circled for quite a while as a spot where the Red Raiders may stumble after a not-so-inspiring effort at Oregon State. Seasoned bettors were licking their chops at the idea of getting Willie Fritz as a juicy 'dog, trying to knock off the head honcho in the Big XII. Apparently oddsmakers wanted nothing to do with that. Prior to Week 1, Texas Tech was a 13.5-point favorite in this game in DraftKings' game of the year market. On Tuesday afternoon, we're looking at mostly -7.5 across the board and it might not be done moving. Can Houston win? Absolutely. Can the Cougars stay within the number? Sure they can. But just know that you are not getting ANY kind of value in this number. Texas Tech has won-and-covered each of the last seven meetings, including a 35-11 road win at Houston last October. The Red Raiders closed as a 13.5-point road favorite in that game, and now are only laying -7.5 at home. Cougars' starting QB Conner Weigman went 5-of-12 for 71 yards with no touchdowns and one interception in that contest. The Cougars will likely be a very trendy upset pick this week and Fritz is a great coach to have on your side, but Houston has quite the gap to close between these two programs after what we saw last year.
Play Texas Tech
| Houston U | 55 / 13 | +42 | 18 | 45 | -36.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Texas Tech | 34 / 17 | +17 | 7 | 45 | -35.5 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Houston U | 09-12 | Southern | -52 | 61.5 | 77-6 | Texas Tech | 09-12 | @ Oregon St. | -26 | 52.5 | 35-24 |
| | 09-05 | Oregon St. | -21 | 50.5 | 33-20 | | 09-05 | Abilene C. | -45 | 60.5 | 33-10 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 10-04-25 | Texas Tech | 35 | -13 | 27 | 50/207 | 28/40/0/345 | 2/1 |
| Houston U | 11 | 51.5 | 12 | 30/103 | 10/25/2/164 | 2/1 |
| Houston U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Oregon State | -21 | L | 33-20 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 9-7 | OV | 10.5 | -12.5 | L | 19-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern | -52 | W | 77-6 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 49-0 | OV | |
| 09-18-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Abilene Christian | -45 | L | 33-10 | UN | 60.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Oregon State | -26 | L | 35-24 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -14.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-18-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
September 19th
| Coastal Carolina | 31 | 56.5 | 43 | | 44 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +38 / -7 | -36.5 / +21 |
| Delaware | 34 | -4.5 | 40(1) | -4 | 40 | 17 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +35 / -9 | -31.5 / +20.5 |
Keep an eye on the status of Delaware QB Nick Minicucci, who left last week's loss at Vanderbilt with an injury but did return as the Blue Hens tried to forge a spirited comeback in Nashville. Minicucci is the straw that stirs the drink in Delaware, leading an offense that out-gained Vanderbilt on a per-play basis last week (and had more first downs). Assuming he is good-to-go, we're interested in the over in this contest. Despite playing in different conferences, these regional foes should have some vague familiarity with one another. Coastal Carolina is led by first-year head coach Ryan Beard, who arrived from Delaware’s Conference USA after a stint at Missouri State. The Chanticleers have looked a little better than expected thus far, covering the spread in each of their first two games against West Virginia and FCS-level Fordham. Our ears perk up in games like this where a small-conference school is coming off a game against an SEC opponent. Those teams are typically nursing some bumps and bruises during the week, and that normally shows up a little bit more on the defensive end where cornerbacks may be a step slow and linebackers are late in clogging the running lane. Coastal Carolina's offense has shown enough to suggest the Chanticleers can score some points in this matchup.
Play the Over
| Coastal Carolina | 34.5 / 19 | +15.5 | 44 | 41 | -8 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Delaware | 34 / 21 | +13 | 40 | 36 | -5.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Coastal Carolina | 09-12 | Fordham | -36.5 | 54 | 45-7 | Delaware | 09-12 | @ Vanderbilt | +20.5 | 53.5 | 26-35 |
| | 09-05 | @ West Virg. | +21 | 54.5 | 24-31 | | 09-03 | Merrimack. | -31.5 | 56.5 | 42-7 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Coastal Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ West Virginia | 21 | W | 24-31 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Fordham | -36.5 | W | 45-7 | UN | 54 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-24-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Delaware |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Merrimack College | -31.5 | W | 42-7 | UN | 56.5 | 0 | W | 7-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 20.5 | W | 26-35 | OV | 53.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 11.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-02-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-13-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona State | 34 | -5.5 | 22 | -3 | 22 | 8 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +63 / -28 | -43.5 / +14.5 |
| Kansas | 23 | 50.5 | 25(0) | | 25 | 15 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | +14 / - | -20 / - |
Game is being played at Wembley Stadium in London. Though we suspect most locals might be paying more attention to the Spurs-Aston Villa match at Tottenham's stadium in North London a bit more than this Big XII battle at Wembley, the Sun Devils and Jayhawks have been picked to further push the conference envelope that loop commish Brett Yormark has been forwarding. Will a commercial success in London foretell future Big XII adventures elsewhere on the globe? Maybe UCF vs. West Virginia next year in Prague? While we contemplate all of that, Lance Leipold might have other things on his mind after his Kansas was put in its place in last Friday’s border war vs. Missouri, such as the realization that this season’s Jayhawks might have a significant drop-off at QB from recent years when Jalon Daniels (who has made the NFL Bucs roster as Baker Mayfield's backup) was piloting the attack. Successor Isaiah Marshall was found very wanting last week against the Tigers, completing less than half of his passes, tossing a pair of picks and being sacked four times as Kansas gradually lost touch in Lawrence. Big XII onlookers seem to have fewer questions about ASU, as Kentucky transfer QB Cutter Boley has been whipping the ball around the yard pretty good in two starts, already on eight TD passes, and while noting that six of those came vs. outmanned FCS rep Morgan State in the opener, Boley had highly-ranked Texas A&M on its heels for much of last week’s clash in College Station before Aggie manpower (and two pick-sixes in the fourth quarter) turned a close game into a misleading romp at Kyle Field. Moreover, the Sun Devils might have uncovered a new star in 6-foot-5 senior wideout transfer Reed Harris, already on 15 catches for better than 21 yards per grab after snaring nine last week. We’re guessing he is happy with the move to transfer from Boston College in the offseason. Kenny Dillngham’s Sun Devils did outgain A&M by more than 100 yards, too, and after holding Marcel Reed and the Aggie offense to well under 300 yards, Dillingham can feel confident that many of the Marshall-led Jayhawk advances are likely to fizzle. As long as the Sun Devils don’t kill themselves with giveaways (four last Saturday) and penalties (nine at College Station, compared to just one for A&M) like last week, Arizona State can fire the majority of scoring shots in London before heading to Heathrow for a long and happy flight home.
Play Arizona State
| Arizona State | 45 / 27.5 | +17.5 | 22 | 32 | -14.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Kansas | 36 / 22 | +14 | 25 | 35 | -20 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 |
| Arizona State | 09-12 | @ Texas A&M | +14.5 | 51.5 | 20-48 | Kansas | 09-11 | Missouri | +4.5 | 51.5 | 21-38 |
| | 09-05 | Morgan St. | -43.5 | 52.5 | 70-7 | | 09-04 | Long Isla. | -44.5 | 57 | 51-6 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 10-05-24 | Kansas | 31 | 50 | 23 | 33/151 | 18/31/0/260 | 1/0 |
| Arizona State | 35 | -2.5 | 28 | 45/309 | 15/25/1/172 | 1/1 |
| Arizona State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Morgan State | -43.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 28-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas A&M | 14.5 | L | 20-48 | OV | 51.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-0-1 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Long Island University | -44.5 | W | 51-6 | P | 57 | | W | 6-0 | OV | | | W | 30-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | Missouri | 4.5 | L | 21-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | W | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Buffalo U | 3 | 48.5 | 50 | | 46 | 42 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +4 / -13 | -18.5 / +8 |
| Penn State | 42 | -40 | 12(3) | -41 | 12 | 36 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | +45 / +18 | -23 / -24 |
It was hot enough in South Philadelphia last weekend, and Penn State head coach Matt Campbell made the Nittany Lion faithful sweat a little more than necessary. In a glorified home-but-not-home-game against Temple, we had a tie ballgame at the end of the first half before the Nittany Lions found their legs. Some curious play calling in the red zone prevented Penn State from taking an early lead and normally-reliable kicker Ryan Barker missed a field goal to keep the outnumbered cherry-and-white fans interested. Needing to jumpstart the offense, Rocco Becht turned to old faithful as he connected with former Iowa State tight end Benjamin Brahmer for two touchdowns. Under James Franklin, the Nittany Lions were very good against the spread as a notable favorite. With Wisconsin coming to town next week in the Big Ten opener, Campbell doesn't strike us as a guy that is too concerned with punching in late scores. Starting running back Carson Hansen was held to just 4.4 yards per carry against the Owls, so getting the running game in Big Ten shape will likely be the focus in this one. We have a pretty strong lean toward the under in this one, but with such a disparity of talent between Penn State's defense and Buffalo's offense, the likelihood of a defensive touchdown is high. The Nittany Lions already have a +3 turnover margin this season, and we expect that number to grow against the struggling Bulls.
| Buffalo U | 20.5 / 25 | -4.5 | 44 | 48 | -5.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Penn State | 36 / 4.5 | +31.5 | 12 | 36 | -23.5 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Buffalo U | 09-12 | @ Florida I. | +8 | 47.5 | 20-33 | Penn State | 09-12 | @ Temple | -24 | 49.5 | 27-9 |
| | 09-03 | Albany | -18.5 | 47.5 | 21-17 | | 09-05 | Marshall | -23 | 53.5 | 45-0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Buffalo U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Albany | -18.5 | L | 21-17 | UN | 47.5 | 0 | L | 0-7 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 14-10 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Florida Intl | 8 | L | 20-33 | OV | 47.5 | 3 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10 | 5.5 | L | 6-21 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Robert Morris | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Penn State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Marshall | -23 | W | 45-0 | UN | 53.5 | -7 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Temple | -24 | L | 27-9 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | L | 10-3 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-02-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kent State | 3 | 58.5 | 49 | | 49 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +21 / -57 | -10 / +35.5 |
| Ohio State | 49 | -52 | 3.5(3) | -48.5 | 4 | 4 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +53 / -1 | -50 / +2 |
This is the first meeting since 2014 between these Buckeye State foes. Ohio State dispatched fellow MAC entry Ball State 56-3 two weeks ago, and beat Ohio 37-9 last year. We're not sure how many teams actually have the talent to replicate it, but Texas laid the blueprint for defending the Buckeyes. First-year defensive coordinator Will Muschamp made some fantastic halftime adjustments against star receiver Jeremiah Smith and Ohio State never found the end zone in the second half of Saturday's 24-23 loss in Austin. Smith finished with eight catches for 164 yards and one touchdown, but he didn't touch the ball after the 9:37 mark of the third quarter. Six of his eight catches came in the first half, but Buckeyes' QB Julian Sayin went 0-for-4 when targeting Smith over the final four possessions. Ultimately, this result will come down to how many series Ryan Day leaves his starters in for. The Buckeyes don't have their bye week until the end of October, so they will open the season with seven-straight games. This is as close to a bye week as you're going to get, so Coach Day might as well take advantage of it. Kent State has typically struggled in these games in the past. Over the last two seasons, the Flashes have lost to Texas Tech, Florida State, Oklahoma and South Carolina by an average margin of 51.3 points per game. But guess what? A 51-point loss in Columbus would still be enough to cover this spread.
Play Kent State
| Kent State | 18 / 36 | -18 | 49 | 36 | +13 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Ohio State | 39.5 / 13.5 | +26 | 4 | 26 | -24 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Kent State | 09-12 | Wofford | -10 | 46 | 36-15 | Ohio State | 09-12 | @ Texas | +2 | 50.5 | 23-24 |
| | 09-05 | @ South Car. | +35.5 | 53 | 0-57 | | 09-05 | Ball State | -50 | 55.5 | 56-3 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Kent State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ South Carolina | 35.5 | L | 0-57 | OV | 53 | 9.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 21 | L | 0-29 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wofford | -10 | W | 36-15 | OV | 46 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | L | 14-15 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ohio State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Ball State | -50 | W | 56-3 | OV | 55.5 | -13.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -28.5 | L | 28-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas | 2 | W | 23-24 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Carolina | 20 | 44.5 | 23 | | 24 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | +32 / - | -36.5 / - |
| Clemson | 19 | -3 | 20(3) | -6 | 18 | 38 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +15 / -41 | -19.5 / +10 |
Clemson is 7-0 straight-up, 6-1 against the spread in the last seven meetings of this ACC series. The Tigers beat the Tar Heels 38-10 in Chapel Hill last season as a 15.5-point road favorite. Clemson out-gained North Carolina 488-270 in that contest. "He ain't a good one right now, but he's gonna be." Those were the words that Tigers head coach Dabo Swinney used to describe true freshman quarterback Tait Reynolds, who will get the starting nod in this one. Reynolds went 16-of-27 for 178 yards against Georgia Southern in relief of starter Christoper Vizzina, who suffered an elbow injury and is expected to miss some time. After taking care of business against the Eagles, Swinney said that he planned on making the move to Reynolds regardless of Vizzina's status. "It's based on how they played. We just feel, based on opportunity, mistakes and body of work, Tait has earned the opportunity to start." The Tar Heels are 2-0 after taking down FCS-level East Tennessee State on Saturday. North Carolina generated 8.1 yards per play and transfer QB Billy Edwards Jr. enjoyed a productive afternoon with just five incompletions and no interceptions. This game has seen plenty of action in the early-week market, and we're looking in the Tar Heels' direction. It's anyone's guess what we'll see from Reynolds in his first career start against one of the greatest defensive minds the sport has ever seen, but there seems to be a little more pep in Bill Belichick's step right now.
Play North Carolina
| North Carolina | 25 / 6.5 | +18.5 | 24 | 36 | -14.5 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 |
| Clemson | 16 / 29 | -13 | 17 | 23 | -5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| North Carolina | 09-12 | East Tenn. | -36.5 | 55 | 35-3 | Clemson | 09-12 | Georgia S. | -19.5 | 54.5 | 22-7 |
| | 08-29 | @ TCU | +7.5 | 46.5 | 15-10 | | 09-05 | @ LSU | +10 | 49 | 10-51 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 10-04-25 | Clemson | 38 | -15.5 | 23 | 31/89 | 30/39/0/399 | 2/1 |
| North Carolina | 10 | 47.5 | 19 | 18/57 | 26/42/0/213 | 1/0 |
| North Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ TCU | 7.5 | W | 15-10 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | W | 12-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | East Tennessee State | -36.5 | L | 35-3 | UN | 55 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Clemson |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ LSU | 10 | L | 10-51 | OV | 49 | 3 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia Southern | -19.5 | L | 22-7 | UN | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11 | L | 16-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-25-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Charleston Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Akron | 7 | 48.5 | 52 | | 50 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +35 / -22 | -26.5 / +28 |
| Minnesota U | 38 | -22.5 | 21.5(2) | -32.5 | 20 | 16 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +13.5 / - | -21 / - |
The Gophers are licking their wounds after getting whipped by Mississippi State in the opener. PJ Fleck will need to pull out all of the motivational tricks to pull his team off the mat, but we are focused on the total in this one. Gophers' running back Darius Taylor only played 16 snaps against the Bulldogs and was unable to finish that game. Freshman receiver Hayden Moore also suffered a leg injury and was able to finish that contest. Fleck will likely ask the defense to do the heavy lifting in this one, which they've had no problems with in the past. Over the last two seasons, Minnesota's defense has been dominant against inferior competition in lower-scoring games. In 2025, Minnesota allowed a total of ten points in non-conference games against Buffalo and Northwestern State. In 2024, Minnesota did not allow a single point in non-conference games against Rhode Island and Nevada. Minnesota only allowed seven points against Eastern Illinois in this year’s opener. Akron earned a win-and-cover last week against FCS-level Robert Morris, but don't forget the Zips lost their starting QB on the eve of Week 1 against Wake Forest. Joe Moorhead's team is still finding its footing, and based on what the Gophers have done in this spot in years past, the Zips are likely going to struggle.
Play the Under
| Akron | 30.5 / 24 | +6.5 | 50 | 39 | +1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Minnesota U | 36 / 22.5 | +13.5 | 19 | 35 | -21 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Akron | 09-12 | Robert Mo. | -26.5 | 45.5 | 45-10 | Minnesota U | 09-12 | Mississip. | +1 | 53.5 | 13-38 |
| | 09-03 | @ Wake Fore. | +28 | 50.5 | 16-38 | | 09-03 | Eastern I. | -42.5 | 52.5 | 59-7 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Akron |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | 28 | W | 16-38 | OV | 50.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Robert Morris | -26.5 | W | 45-10 | OV | 45.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Minnesota U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Eastern Illinois | -42.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 52.5 | 0 | W | 14-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 35-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Mississippi St | 1 | L | 13-38 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | L | 6-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tulane | 13 | 50 | 33 | | 33 | 43 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +4 / -14 | -10 / +9.5 |
| Kansas State | 38 | -20.5 | 16.5(2) | -18.5 | 17 | 34 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +47.5 / - | -29.5 / - |
The Wildcats and Green Wave will continue their every-other-year series as Tulane travels to Manhattan on Saturday. The road team has handled business in the first two games of this matchup with the Wave winning at K-State in 2022, and the 'Cats returned the favor in New Orleans in 2024. Collin Klein's team has out-scored its first two opponents 108-10 as the 'Cats beat up on Nicholls and Washington State. In this battle of first-year head coaches, things are looking a little tougher on Bourbon Street as Will Hall tries to maintain the foundation that Willie Fritz and Jon Sumrall laid. After getting beat by two touchdowns against Duke in the opener, the Green Wave narrowly escaped South Alabama at home last week. The Jaguars enjoyed a 25-13 advantage in first downs, but an 80-yard touchdown run by Jaylin Lucas was about the only thing the Green Wave could hang their hat on. Our power ratings are in line with where this game has opened, but we can only look in the Wildcats' direction. Tulane QB Kadin Semonza is only completing 58.1-percent of his passes thus far and we haven't seen enough from the Wave passing attack to suggest they can stay within the number. K-State has a bye coming up in two weeks, so there's no real need to pull up short of the goalposts here because there's a rest spot on the horizon. Klein was a member of the Wildcats' coaching staff that lost to Tulane in Manhattan in 2022, and he already let the media know that he remembers that game in his press conference earlier this week.
Play Kansas State
| Tulane | 15.5 / 20.5 | -5 | 32 | 32 | -0.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Kansas State | 52.5 / 5 | +47.5 | 18 | 45 | -29.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Tulane | 09-12 | South Ala. | -10 | 48 | 28-24 | Kansas State | 09-12 | Washingto. | -17.5 | 48.5 | 34-7 |
| | 09-05 | @ Duke | +9.5 | 51.5 | 3-17 | | 09-05 | Nicholls . | -41.5 | 55.5 | 71-3 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tulane |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-1-1 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-1-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Duke | 9.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 51.5 | 3 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | South Alabama | -10 | L | 28-24 | OV | 48 | -3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | -6.5 | L | 14-10 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Nicholls State | -41.5 | W | 71-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 22-0 | OV | | | W | 36-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Washington State | -17.5 | W | 34-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10 | -10 | PK | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-Rated Priority Pick | | Updated: 09/15 8:08 pm |
| Georgia | 45 | -24.5 | 2.5 | -21.5 | 3 | 40 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | +55 / - | -45 / - |
| Arkansas | 21 | 54.5 | 26(2) | | 23 | 15 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | +17 / -33 | -40.5 / +13.5 |
This will be the first meeting between the 'Dawgs and Razorbacks since October 2021. Georgia has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings. "Georgia wide receiver arrested for driving 900 miles over the speed limit, right? That’s a weekly occurrence." Ryan Silverfield made those comments (along with a few more) on a radio show when he was the head coach at Memphis last September, not having any idea what the next 12 months would bring. Silverfield is now the head coach at Arkansas, and his first SEC opponent is...Georgia. Both coaches have been asked about the remarks and both are taking the high road, but Kirby Smart seems more willing to keep the playbook open against inferior opponents this season compared to years past. The Bulldogs have out-scored their first two opponents by a combined margin of 133-23, putting the 0-15 ATS streak as a favorite of 38+ points in the rear view mirror. QB Gunner Stockton went 13-of-16 for 234 yards and five touchdowns in last week's 70-20 win over Western Kentucky. The Bulldogs' first two contests have gone over their respective totals by an average margin of 22 points per game, and that's the only direction we can look in this one. With no one taking an early claim to the Heisman, Stockton may be able to throw his name in the ring against a Razorbacks' defense that just allowed Utah to throw for 300 yards last week. And even though Smart says he's forgiven Silverfield for last year's comments, we'll believe it when we see it.
Play the Over
| Georgia | 66.5 / 11.5 | +55 | 4 | 47 | -45 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Arkansas | 20.5 / 28.5 | -8 | 20 | 35 | -13.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Georgia | 09-12 | Western K. | -40.5 | 55.5 | 70-20 | Arkansas | 09-12 | @ Utah | +13.5 | 55.5 | 10-43 |
| | 09-05 | Tennessee. | -49.5 | 55.5 | 63-3 | | 09-05 | North Ala. | -40.5 | 63.5 | 31-14 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Georgia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tennessee St | -49.5 | W | 63-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Western Kentucky | -40.5 | W | 70-20 | OV | 55.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -24.5 | W | 49-6 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Alabama | -40.5 | L | 31-14 | UN | 63.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Utah | 13.5 | L | 10-43 | UN | 55.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | L | 3-29 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bowling Green | 13 | 43.5 | 48 | | 47 | 17 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | -7 / -49 | -1.5 / +31 |
| Iowa State | 27 | -22.5 | 26(3) | -25 | 27 | 16 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 | +28 / -3 | -29.5 / +14 |
The "letdown spot" alarm bells are ringing, but what have you seen from Bowling Green to suggest the Falcons can stay feisty in this one? There's no doubt that Iowa State is feeling down after letting last week's CyHawk slip away in a 16-13 loss. The Cyclones took a lead into the fourth quarter but Iowa kicked the game-winning 42-yard field goal with 15 seconds remaining. QB Jaylen Raynor doesn't look ready for the Power Conference spotlight as he went 10-of-19 for 117 yards against the Hawkeyes. The Cyclones have a tough Big XII opener next week at home against Utah, so the situational spot couldn't be any better for Bowling Green. But how much trust can you put in a squad that's lost its first two games to Nebraska and Tarleton State by a combined margin of 76-20? Dating back to the end of last season, Iowa State's last six games have all stayed under the total. The Falcons' offense only generated 169 total yards and nine first downs on 3.5 yards per play last week in Lincoln.
Play the Under
| Bowling Green | 10 / 38 | -28 | 45 | 36 | +15 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Iowa State | 25.5 / 13 | +12.5 | 28 | 36 | -8 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Bowling Green | 09-12 | @ Nebraska | +31 | 49 | 7-56 | Iowa State | 09-12 | @ Iowa | +14 | 42.5 | 13-16 |
| | 09-05 | Tarleton . | -1.5 | 49.5 | 13-20 | | 09-05 | SE Missou. | -29.5 | 52.5 | 38-10 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bowling Green |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tarleton State | -1.5 | L | 13-20 | UN | 49.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | L | 7-17 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Nebraska | 31 | L | 7-56 | OV | 49 | 7 | L | 0-14 | OV | 11.5 | 17.5 | L | 0-35 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Missouri St | -29.5 | L | 38-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Iowa | 14 | W | 13-16 | UN | 42.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Texas | 30 | 62.5 | 34 | | 36 | 25 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +38 / -36 | +3 / +40 |
| Texas State | 27 | -3 | 31(2) | -5 | 31 | 28 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | -5 / -52 | -1.5 / +29.5 |
In the category of “early-season messages from the Group of 6,” the Mean Green’s 44-6 romp past UNLV in Denton is resonating more from the Metroplex than CNN's coverage of the GOP's midterm convention last week in Dallas. Moreover, it is suggesting that any of the expected dropoff from the move of former head coach Eric Morris and much of last year’s North Texas roster to Stillwater might have been a bit overstated. Morris’ successor Neal Brown has won a lot of games in the past and appeared in several bowls at Troy and West Virginia, and has quickly reassembled the Mean Green attack behind UCF transfer and portal veteran QB Tayven Jackson, now on his fourth school (Tennessee and Indiana prior to last fall as a starter for Scott Frost in Orlando). Along with ex-Mountaineer RB Jaheim White (familiar to Brown from previous days in Morgantown, when White gained almost 1,700 yards rushing across the 2023-24 campaigns), already gaining better than seven yards per carry, the North Texas attack looks plenty functional, and many American Conference observers are beginning to pay attention after the Mean Green had also showed much better than the 52-16 final scoreline suggested in the opener at Indiana. The Mean Green out-gained the defending national champ Hoosiers and they were still within earshot into the fourth quarter before Curt Cignetti played the poll game and made sure to jam in a couple of extra window-dressing touchdowns. More encouraging for Brown and his new DC Matt Powledge (via Baylor) is how a transfer-filled defense which returned no starters from a year ago has hit the ground running with a heavy veteran presence (especially senior linebackers Zakye Barker via SMU and Aaron Alexander via Arkansas State) flustering Dan Mullen’s Rebels last week and forcing four turnovers in the process. Meanwhile, though no one is holding CJ Kinne accountable for the opening loss a few miles up I-35 at Texas, the Bobcats are now 0-2 in their Pac-12 debut campaign after letting nearby UTSA rally late for a win last week in San Marcos, as an early-season turnover bugaboo (six giveaways already with a -5 turnover margin) continued to prove costly vs. the Roadrunners as UTSA scored the winning TD in the final 14 seconds. Is an 0-3 start by the Bobcats what Pac-12 commish Teresa Gould was expecting...and should Texas State even be favored here? After two spread wins to open the 2026 campaign, North Texas has now covered 11 of its last 14 against the spread since early last season.
Play North Texas
| North Texas | 30 / 29 | +1 | 38 | 15 | +21.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Texas State | 16.5 / 45 | -28.5 | 31 | 16 | +14 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| North Texas | 09-12 | UNLV | +3 | 58.5 | 44-6 | Texas State | 09-12 | Tex San A. | -1.5 | 65.5 | 26-31 |
| | 09-05 | @ Indiana | +40 | 57.5 | 16-52 | | 09-05 | @ Texas | +29.5 | 61.5 | 7-59 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 01-03-25 | North Texas | 28 | 66.5 | 22 | 24/106 | 26/41/2/393 | 3/1 |
| Texas State | 30 | -15.5 | 26 | 43/204 | 26/35/1/307 | 1/1 |
| North Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-0-2 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Indiana | 40 | W | 16-52 | OV | 57.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-14 | P | 14 | 24 | W | 6-24 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | UNLV | 3 | W | 44-6 | UN | 58.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-0 | P | 13 | 1.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Houston Baptist | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-01-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-1-1 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Texas | 29.5 | L | 7-59 | OV | 61.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-14 | P | 14 | 17.5 | L | 7-28 | OV | 33 |
| 09-12-26 | Tex San Antonio | -1.5 | L | 26-31 | UN | 65.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 14 | -0.5 | W | 17-7 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Incarnate Word | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Eastern Michigan | 13 | 44 | 46 | | 45 | 23 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | +2.5 / -28 | -5 / +17.5 |
| Wisconsin | 31 | -23.5 | 20(3) | -29 | 21 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | +27 / - | -43 / - |
Chris Creighton as a big 'dog against a Big Ten opponent? Sign us up. Eastern Michigan couldn't stay within the number last week at Michigan State, but that was a 14-7 game at halftime before the Spartans pulled away. Over the last four seasons, Eastern Michigan has played four premier non-conference road games at Arizona State, Minnesota, Washington and Kentucky. The Eagles covered the number in all four of those contests. Wisconsin's offense struggling against Notre Dame in the opener was not a surprise. Wisconsin's offense struggling with Western Illinois raises a few eyebrows. The Badgers won 36-9, but only generated 16 first downs and went 5-of-12 on third down. One of Wisconsin's touchdowns came off a blocked punt that was returned to the end zone, and starting QB Colton Joseph ended up playing the entire game against an FCS-level opponent. That's not ideal. Wisconsin travels to Penn State for a late kickoff in Happy Valley next week, so this is an ugly spot for the Badgers. We had high hopes for Joseph this season, but a 12-for-22 effort against an FCS-level opponent will not inject confidence through out the Madison faithful.
Play Eastern Michigan
| Eastern Michigan | 18.7 / 26.3 | -7.7 | 44 | 39 | +2.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Wisconsin | 24.5 / 25 | -0.5 | 21 | 29 | -11 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 |
| Eastern Michigan | 09-12 | @ Michigan . | +17.5 | 49.5 | 7-35 | Wisconsin | 09-12 | Western I. | -43 | 53 | 36-9 |
| | 09-04 | San Jose . | -1 | 55 | 21-27 | | 09-06 | @ Notre Dame | +21.5 | 46 | 13-41 |
| | 08-29 | Sacrament. | -8.5 | 53 | 28-17 | | | | | | |
| Eastern Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1Q SUR:0-1 , PSR:0-3 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Sacramento State | -8.5 | W | 28-17 | UN | 53 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-04-26 | San Jose State | -1 | L | 21-27 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 0 | L | 7-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Michigan State | 17.5 | L | 7-35 | UN | 49.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 26 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Lindenwood | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wisconsin |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Notre Dame | 21.5 | L | 13-41 | OV | 46 | 6.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Illinois | -43 | L | 36-9 | UN | 53 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 23-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| NC State | 27 | 50.5 | 23 | | 21 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +73 / -26 | -33.5 / +4 |
| Vanderbilt | 24 | -3 | 18(2) | -7 | 18 | 40 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +14 / - | -24.5 / - |
NC State took the first step in erasing a sour start to the year with a 73-0 thrashing of FCS-level Richmond on Friday. The Wolfpack were coming off an early-season bye after getting crushed by Virginia in Week 0 at the end of August. CJ Bailey threw for 281 yards on just 13 completions against the Spiders' defense as the Wolfpack out-gained Richmond 734-110. NC State generated 10.6 yards per play and 31 first downs against Richmond while building a 49-0 lead before halftime. Vanderbilt will officially make the move to bluechip freshman Jared Curtis in this contest after he split duties with Blaze Berlowitz through the first two games. Curtis played the whole second half against Delaware, and head coach Clark Lea felt like he saw enough to hand him the reins moving forward. "He plays a fearless style. He can do it now. And my hope is that he continues to build in his confidence and his ability to execute in the position as the year goes on." Playing with ‘a fearless style’ sounds a lot like Diego Pavia’s tenure in Nashville, but Curtis drew a tough assignment in this one. NC State's defense didn't look great in the opener against Virginia, but the Wolfpack flexed its muscle last week against Richmond. Curtis has played enough over the first two games to put a decent amount on tape for the Wolf Pack coaching staff to analyze, and asking a true freshman to win by margin in his first career start is a tall task. Lea is making a good decision before the 'Dores hit SEC play, but we can only look in NC State's direction in this one.
Play NC State
| NC State | 40.5 / 17 | +23.5 | 21 | 36 | -15 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Vanderbilt | 31.5 / 17.5 | +14 | 17 | 48 | -24.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| NC State | 09-11 | Richmond | -33.5 | 50.5 | 73-0 | Vanderbilt | 09-12 | Delaware | -20.5 | 53.5 | 35-26 |
| | 08-29 | @ Virginia | +4 | 50.5 | 8-34 | | 09-05 | Austin Pe. | -28.5 | 57.5 | 28-9 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NC State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-0-1 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Virginia | 4 | L | 8-34 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 2.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Richmond | -33.5 | W | 73-0 | OV | 50.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 49-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Vanderbilt |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Austin Peay | -28.5 | L | 28-9 | UN | 57.5 | | L | 5-6 | OV | | | W | 15-9 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Delaware | -20.5 | L | 35-26 | OV | 53.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -11.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Troy | 10 | 49.5 | 38 | | 38 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | +10 / - | -19.5 / - |
| Missouri | 35 | -26.5 | 15.5(2) | -24.5 | 15 | 25 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +40 / +17 | -55.5 / -4.5 |
It took some time for the Tigers to find their gear, but Missouri earned an impressive 38-21 road win at Kansas on Friday. Mizzou didn't hit the scoreboard until 5:22 remaining in the first half, but the flood gates opened up from there. Ole Miss transfer QB Austin Simmons has gotten off to a nice start in Columbia, throwing for 292 yards and three touchdowns last week against the Jayhawks. Reserve running back Jamal Roberts ran for 125 yards and a touchdown while the Tigers await the return of starter Ahmad Hardy. Troy has won, but has not covered the first two games against Sam Houston and Alcorn State. Missouri represents a stiff jump in class from what the Trojans have faced thus far. Dating back to the end of last season, Troy's last eight games have all stayed under the total. Our power ratings are directly in line with where this game has opened. Mizzou travels to Mississippi State for the SEC opener next week, so the Tigers have some bigger fish to fry. Troy did put quite a scare into Clemson last year, so Coach Drinkwitz probably won't have to look far for a spark if he feels that his Tigers are flat in practice this week. We're comfortable riding Troy's "under" train for one more stop. Simmons has plenty of experience, so Drinkwitz probably doesn't need to see him throw the ball 35 times in this contest.
Play the Under
| Troy | 29 / 19 | +10 | 39 | 53 | -19.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 |
| Missouri | 46 / 17.5 | +28.5 | 15 | 40 | -30 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Troy | 09-12 | Alabama St | -23.5 | 52.5 | 34-17 | Missouri | 09-11 | @ Kansas | -4.5 | 51.5 | 38-21 |
| | 09-05 | Sam Houst. | -15.5 | 52.5 | 24-21 | | 09-03 | Arkansas . | -55.5 | 62.5 | 54-14 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Troy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Sam Houston St | -15.5 | L | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama St | -23.5 | L | 34-17 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-06-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Missouri |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Arkansas Pine Bluff | -55.5 | L | 54-14 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 40-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | @ Kansas | -4.5 | W | 38-21 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | L | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wyoming | 19 | -1.5 | 44 | | 41 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +8 / -22 | -23.5 / +2.5 |
| Central Michigan | 14 | 40 | 45(1) | PK | 44 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | +3 / -31 | -18.5 / +11 |
After these two were both shellacked in their openers and barely chugged past FCS opposition a week ago, we have to wonder if either is capable of escaping the gravity pull of the other. Fans in Laramie were actually cheering last Saturday’s lightning delay vs. Northern Colorado as they continue to wait for any signs of life from the “new” Wyoming offense that was supposed to be upgraded under first-year OC Christian Taylor via William & Mary, who brought along his productive QB Tyler Hughes with him from Williamsburg. To this point, however, Cowboy fans are seeing no discernible difference from recent times with Craig Bohl’s stodgy, circa 1960s-style Nebraska offense and disciple Jay Sawvel’s adoption of the same the past two years as Hughes (just two TD passes and three picks) has yet to get untracked and no Wyoming running back has popped a gain of more than 15 yards. Meanwhile, they might be asking for Jim McElwain to return to the sidelines in Mt. Pleasant as the Chippewas are scoring at a molasses-like 10 points per game after two weeks, with second-year head coach Matt Drinkall apparently trying to live out his ball-control fantasies from six seasons on Jeff Monken’s Army staff with a ground-based offense that, like at West Point, is eschewing the forward pass. Central Michigan is only averaging 53 yards per game through the air in the first two weeks, but unfortunately not running the ball like the Black Knights with limited quarterbacks Angel Flores and Jadyn Glasser accounting for nearly 60-percent of CMU’s carries between them. If that’s not bad enough, the Chips have been playing giveaway (five turnovers across the first two weeks) and have been heavily penalized, too, already flagged for 15 infractions by the referees across the first two weeks, and were in desperate trouble last week against visiting Colgate before finally pushing across the go-ahead TD in the fourth quarter of a 13-10 root canal that had some CMU fans asking StubHub and Vivid Seats for a refund. We can’t think of many foes we would trust the Cowboys against, but the Chips might be one of those.
Play Wyoming
| Wyoming | 17 / 24 | -7 | 39 | 47 | -10.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Central Michigan | 10 / 24 | -14 | 43 | 43 | -4 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Wyoming | 09-12 | Northern . | -23.5 | 44.5 | 21-13 | Central Michigan | 09-12 | Colgate | -18.5 | 49.5 | 13-10 |
| | 09-05 | @ Colorado . | +2.5 | 46 | 13-35 | | 09-05 | @ New Mexico | +11 | 47.5 | 7-38 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Wyoming |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Colorado State | 2.5 | L | 13-35 | OV | 46 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9 | 0.5 | L | 6-14 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Northern Colorado | -23.5 | L | 21-13 | UN | 44.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 7-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Central Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:0-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ New Mexico | 11 | L | 7-38 | UN | 47.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Colgate | -18.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 49.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 0-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/16 1:01 am |
| Temple | 20 | 48.5 | 36 | | 36 | 12 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +3 / - | +5 / - |
| Toledo | 24 | -4.5 | 36(1) | -1 | 37 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +53 / -10 | -36.5 / +10 |
Still at square one? We're two games into the season, and Temple's search for a quarterback doesn't feel like it's much closer to a resolution now than it was at the end of August. Penn State transfer Jaxon Smolik saw the majority of snaps against his former team on Saturday, but he certainly didn't put a stamp on the job with only 59 passing yards on 16 attempts. Ajani Sheppard scored the Owls' only touchdown as he continues to push for the job. This is another one of those games where one team just got bloodied against a superior opponent, while the other did the moonwalk up-and-down the field. Toledo is coming off a 63-10 win over FCS-level Central Connecticut. Our power ratings favor Temple in this matchup, but with little clarity at the most important position plus the after-effects of playing Penn State, we understand the move toward the Rockets. Last season, Temple got crushed by Oklahoma then fell behind 21-0 in the first quarter of the following game. Toledo is transforming into a run-first offense under first-year head coach Mike Jacobs, and the Owls can hang their hat on a stout run defense. Temple's defense held Nittany Lions' running back Carson Hansen to 4.4 yards per carry, and they will need another stout effort to make up for an offense that simply isn't firing at the moment.
Play the Under
| Temple | 23.5 / 20.5 | +3 | 36 | 33 | +5 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Toledo | 41.5 / 20 | +21.5 | 37 | 40 | -13.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Temple | 09-12 | Penn State | +24 | 49.5 | 9-27 | Toledo | 09-12 | Central C. | -36.5 | 52.5 | 63-10 |
| | 09-05 | Rhode Isl. | -14.5 | 51.5 | 38-14 | | 09-04 | @ Michigan . | +10 | 48.5 | 20-30 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Temple |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Rhode Island | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 10-7 | OV | | | W | 24-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Penn State | 24 | W | 9-27 | UN | 49.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | W | 3-10 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-25-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Toledo |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-0-1 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Michigan State | 10 | PK | 20-30 | OV | 48.5 | 3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 6.5 | L | 7-19 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Central Conn. | -36.5 | W | 63-10 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 14-3 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| SMU | 27 | 57.5 | 15 | | 15 | 55 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +46 / +3 | -32.5 / -3 |
| Louisville | 31 | -3 | 14(2) | -3 | 15 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | +46 / - | -39 / - |
SMU has won-and-covered each of the first two meetings with Louisville since joining the ACC. The Mustangs earned a 34-27 road win in 2024 and followed that up with a 38-6 win in Dallas last season. SMU out-gained the Cards 485-228 in that contest. Louisville handled business as a 56.5-point favorite over FCS-level Villanova on Friday. The Cardinals may have a few interested viewers from Columbus watching this game because the early-season performance of Ohio State transfer QB Lincoln Kienholz has the Buckeye faithful questioning why he's not still a member of the Scarlet and Gray. In his first two starts for the Cardinals, Kienholz has thrown for 639 yards with four touchdowns, no interceptions and a 68.0-percent completion rate. Oh by the way, he's also added 111 yards with three touchdowns on 5.5 yards per carry on the ground. SMU earned an impressive 56-10 win over FCS-level UC-Davis. The Aggies entered this week as the No. 7-ranked team at the lower level, so Rhett Lashlee should be pleased with the fact that his Mustangs enjoyed a +5.9 yards per play advantage while playing on a short week (SMU played at Florida State on Labor Day). QB Kevin Jennings went 14-of-16 for 337 yards with five touchdowns and no interceptions. This should be a great game, but we're intrigued by what we have seen from Kienholz thus far. You could tell that the Cardinals were a little too wound-up in the opener against Ole Miss, but now with a big game already under their belt, Jeff Brohm's team should look a little more comfortable in this one.
Play Louisville
| SMU | 41.5 / 17 | +24.5 | 14 | 37 | -18 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Louisville | 48.5 / 27 | +21.5 | 15 | 32 | -16.5 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 |
| SMU | 09-12 | UC Davis | -32.5 | 59 | 56-10 | Louisville | 09-11 | Villanova | -39 | 56.5 | 59-13 |
| | 09-07 | @ Florida S. | -3 | 52.5 | 27-24 | | 09-06 | @ Mississip. | +6.5 | 54.5 | 38-41 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 11-22-25 | Louisville | 6 | 49.5 | 12 | 29/128 | 14/20/1/100 | 1/0 |
| SMU | 38 | -3.5 | 28 | 36/178 | 30/38/0/307 | 1/0 |
| 10-05-24 | SMU | 34 | 55 | 26 | 32/194 | 22/28/0/291 | 1/0 |
| Louisville | 27 | -7 | 21 | 33/133 | 22/35/1/329 | 0/0 |
| SMU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-0-1 |
| 09-07-26 | @ Florida State | -3 | PK | 27-24 | UN | 52.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -1.5 | W | 17-10 | P | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | UC Davis | -32.5 | W | 56-10 | OV | 59 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisville |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Mississippi | 6.5 | W | 38-41 | OV | 54.5 | 3 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | 4 | PK | 6-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Villanova | -39 | W | 59-13 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 17-3 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-10 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miami Ohio | 20 | 51 | 34.5 | | 35 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +38 / -45 | -30.5 / +16.5 |
| Cincinnati U | 31 | -14.5 | 27(2) | -9.5 | 27 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +35.5 / - | -22 / - |
It's nice to see this game back on the schedule after a one-year absence. Miami earned an overtime win at Cincinnati in 2023 as a 14.5-point 'dog, but the Bearcats returned the favor with a road win in Oxford in 2024. After a disappointing effort against Pitt in the opener, Miami rebounded nicely with a 45-7 win over FCS-level Holy Cross. RedHawks' QB David McComb went 13-of-13 for 234 yards with three touchdowns against the Crusaders and Miami enjoyed a +4.0 yards per play advantage while only punting one time. Cincinnati is coming off a 62-10 home win over Western Carolina with a final score that is a little flattering for the Bearcats. That was a 14-10 game with under four minutes remaining in the second quarter before Cincinnati blew the doors open in the second half. The same was largely true in the opener against Boston College, who out-gained the Bearcats by 49 yards and had seven more first downs, but couldn't overcome a -2 turnover differential. We have this game lined closer to -10, so catching more than two touchdowns with the RedHawks in a rivalry game has caught our eye. Most of the rosters have changed since their last meeting in 2024, but even in that Cincinnati win two years ago, the yardage was only 401-380. There's not THAT big of a gap between these two programs.
Play Miami (Oh)
| Miami Ohio | 29.5 / 33 | -3.5 | 35 | 37 | -7 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Cincinnati U | 48 / 12.5 | +35.5 | 26 | 43 | -22 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Miami Ohio | 09-12 | Holy Cross | -30.5 | 47 | 45-7 | Cincinnati U | 09-12 | Western C. | -36.5 | 61.5 | 62-10 |
| | 09-05 | @ Pittsburg. | +16.5 | 48 | 14-59 | | 09-05 | Boston Co. | -7 | 51.5 | 34-15 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Miami Ohio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 16.5 | L | 14-59 | OV | 48 | 3.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 10 | 9.5 | L | 14-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Holy Cross | -30.5 | W | 45-7 | OV | 47 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Cincinnati U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Boston College | -7 | W | 34-15 | UN | 51.5 | -3 | PK | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 10-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Carolina | -36.5 | W | 62-10 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 28-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UTEP | 6 | 48.5 | 46 | | 46 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +41 / -51 | -26.5 / +41 |
| Michigan | 45 | -34.5 | 12.5(3) | -36.5 | 12 | 8 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | +4 / - | -11.5 / - |
The University of Michigan is a highly-regarded academic institution in this country, and Kyle Whittingham may be sitting in some lecture halls this week to figure out what he needs for the Wolverines' offense. Michigan earned a much-needed 17-10 victory over Oklahoma last week, but the maize-and-blue find themselves in a much different role this week. Since Bryce Underwood's arrival last season, the Wolverines are 2-6 against the spread as a double-digit favorite and we all know what coulda-shoulda-woulda happened in the opener against Western Michigan. The problem is simple: Michigan's best option on offense is to use Underwood's legs, but it's not worth putting him in danger against an inferior opponent. So if you don't want Underwood to run in these games and you want him to run the offense in the pocket, you end up with a team that has scored 15 points per game so far. That's the problem. What's the solution? Who knows. Underwood appeared to have a nice connection with JJ Buchanan in the opener against the Broncos, but Buchanan only caught two balls on six targets last week against the Sooners. From a "let's maintain this momentum" standpoint, you have to let Underwood run this week and just let the chips fall where they fall. This UTEP team got beat 51-0 by Oklahoma in the opener, so neither coaching staff has to look very far for some common data points.
| UTEP | 25.5 / 30.5 | -5 | 47 | 31 | +7.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Michigan | 15 / 11 | +4 | 12 | 22 | -11.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 |
| UTEP | 09-12 | Texas Sou. | -26.5 | 53 | 51-10 | Michigan | 09-12 | Oklahoma | +5 | 43.5 | 17-10 |
| | 09-04 | @ Oklahoma | +41 | 51.5 | 0-51 | | 09-05 | Western M. | -27.5 | 50.5 | 13-12 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| UTEP |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Oklahoma | 41 | L | 0-51 | UN | 51.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | OV | 12.5 | 24 | L | 0-27 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | Texas Southern | -26.5 | W | 51-10 | OV | 53 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Michigan | -27.5 | L | 13-12 | UN | 50.5 | -7 | L | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -16.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Oklahoma | 5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 10-0 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| USC | 42 | -21 | 12 | -16 | 11 | 38 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | +24.7 / - | -30 / - |
| Rutgers | 23 | 58.5 | 30(2) | | 29 | 33 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | -16 / -7 | -29.5 / +3 |
A few weeks ago, the popular refrain from USC was that the “preseason” portion of the schedule would end as soon as Big Ten play commenced this week. That was before, however, we and everyone else got a good look at Saturday foe Rutgers, which is fortunate the Big Ten isn’t like the English Premier League and demotes the bottom three finishers to the MAC or Conference USA. The Scarlet Knights got boat-raced by 4-TD underdog UMass in the opener then lost at Boston College last Friday. Regional sources are now wondering that with a new athletic director and school prexy on board since his hire after the 2019 season, if perhaps head coach Greg Schiano’s only lifeline to the end of the season is a contract buyout (reportedly in the $17-18 million range) that a debt-ridden athletic department might not be able to swallow at the moment. It gets tougher for Schiano to fight back without a reliable QB, which he apparently doesn’t have after his first two options (transfer Dylan Lonergan, who missed the BC game due to injury, and third-year holdover AJ Surace) combined for a ghastly seven picks in the first two games. So, it seems like the “real season” for the Trojans now waits to begin next week vs. Oregon, while QB Jayden Maiava (81-percent completions, ten TD passes and just one interception in three games) has a chance to further fuel his fledgling Heisman campaign and impress some voters in the Eastern Time zone by detonating the Lincoln Riley offense, which is scoring at a brisk 43 points per game clip, in Piscataway. There is a significant caution at this inflated price, however, as the Trojan defense has leaked in the late going of the San Jose State and Louisiana Ragin’ Cajun blowouts while new (but veteran) defensive coordinator Gary Patterson has subbed freely to blood many his touted bluechip acquisitions. Indeed, the backdoor has already swung wide open a couple of times with the Spartans and Cajuns each taking advantage, and while Schiano’s QBs have been error-prone, they are likely to keep firing away for 60 minutes. With the meat of the schedule dead ahead, is there any reason for Riley to stay on the accelerator the whole way? One last reminder...the Trojans have yet to cover a spread in eight tries on the Big Ten road outside of Los Angeles County (which omits a close win over a subpar UCLA in nearby Pasadena two years ago) since joining the loop in 2024.
Play the Over
| USC | 43.3 / 18.7 | +24.7 | 10 | 37 | -30 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 |
| Rutgers | 21 / 32.5 | -11.5 | 27 | 43 | -13.5 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| USC | 09-12 | Louisiana | -30.5 | 59 | 49-30 | Rutgers | 09-11 | @ Boston Co. | +3 | 53.5 | 21-28 |
| | 09-04 | Fresno St. | -22.5 | 51.5 | 39-0 | | 09-03 | Massachus. | -29.5 | 55 | 21-37 |
| | 08-29 | San Jose . | -37 | 61 | 42-26 | | | | | | |
|
| 10-25-24 | Rutgers | 20 | 57 | 27 | 42/121 | 27/47/0/313 | 0/0 |
| USC | 42 | -14 | 23 | 23/135 | 20/28/0/308 | 1/0 |
| USC |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-0 , PSR:0-2-1 , O/U:0-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:2-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | San Jose State | -37 | L | 42-26 | OV | 61 | -10 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14 | -23.5 | W | 28-0 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | Fresno State | -22.5 | W | 39-0 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | PK | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 30-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Louisiana | -30.5 | L | 49-30 | OV | 59 | -7.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rutgers |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Massachusetts | -29.5 | L | 21-37 | OV | 55 | -7.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -17.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-11-26 | @ Boston College | 3 | L | 21-28 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-25-26 | Howard | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida State | 16 | 50.5 | 19 | | 18 | 14 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 0-1-1 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | +7 / - | -14 / - |
| Alabama | 31 | -18 | 7(3) | -15 | 7 | 21 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +38 / +28 | -28 / -9 |
Good news or bad news? Well, depending on who you ask. The Mike Norvell situation in Tallahassee took an interesting turn this week as Michael Alford was fired as Florida State's athletic director. Conventional wisdom would suggest that the incoming AD - whoever that may be - will likely want to put their stamp on the football program with a new hire. Norvell was asked about it several times this week and gave the politically-correct answers, but this has to be weighing on the program to some extent. In Tuscaloosa, the Crimson Tide faithful are hopeful that they just saw Keelon Russell's coming-of-age moment. After a disastrous first half at Kentucky that saw two interceptions (including one returned for a TD), Russell and the Tide out-scored the Wildcats 32-0 in the second half. It certainly wasn't pretty at times, but you could see Russell gain maturity and confidence with every play in the second half against the tiring Kentucky defense. That second half performance gives Kalen DeBoer and Alabama's coaching staff an idea of what their ceiling is. Unfortunately, the first half probably gave them a look at what their floor is. The Tide will be looking for revenge after last year's upset, but with such a young QB that is still getting his feet wet, they simply need wins - not style points. Florida State is coming off a bye, so the 'Noles have had extra time to prep for this one. We have this game lined closer to -15, so we'll be holding our nose and hoping FSU still has some fight for their battle-tested coach.
Play Florida State
| Florida State | 29 / 22 | +7 | 17 | 30 | -14 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 0-1-1 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 |
| Alabama | 46.5 / 13.5 | +33 | 7 | 26 | -18.5 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Florida State | 09-07 | SMU | +3 | 52.5 | 24-27 | Alabama | 09-12 | @ Kentucky | -9 | 47.5 | 45-17 |
| | 08-29 | New Mexic. | -31 | 53.5 | 34-17 | | 09-05 | East Caro. | -28 | 52.5 | 48-10 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 08-30-25 | Alabama | 17 | -13.5 | 18 | 29/87 | 23/43/0/254 | 1/0 |
| Florida State | 31 | 47.5 | 20 | 49/230 | 9/14/0/152 | 2/1 |
| Florida State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-1-1 |
| 08-29-26 | New Mexico State | -31 | L | 34-17 | UN | 53.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -18.5 | L | 17-7 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-07-26 | SMU | 3 | PK | 24-27 | UN | 52.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-17 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Central Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | East Carolina | -28 | W | 48-10 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -16.5 | W | 38-7 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kentucky | -9 | W | 45-17 | OV | 47.5 | -3 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -5.5 | L | 13-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Chattanooga | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kentucky | 20 | 48.5 | 18.5 | | 20 | 7 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +2 / - | -7 / - |
| Texas A&M | 31 | -17 | 11.5(3) | -10 | 9 | 22 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +39 / - | -26.5 / - |
Hey, do I know you? Despite playing in the same conference for the last 15 years, this will be the second meeting between Texas A&M and Kentucky since 1953. The Aggies earned a 20-14 overtime win against the 'Cats in October 2018, which is the only time they have met in the last 70+ years despite playing in the same league. In College Station, the Marcel Reed train is beginning to lose passengers. The Aggies are off to a 2-0 start, but their 48-20 win over Arizona State featured arguably the most-misleading final score of last weekend. That was a 24-20 game entering the fourth quarter before Texas A&M returned two interceptions for a touchdown. The Sun Devils out-gained the Aggies by 114 yards and held a +1.6 yards per play advantage. Reed went 15-of-25 through the air with just 17 yards on the ground and things probably won't get much easier in this one. If Texas A&M was involved in the most-misleading result of the weekend, then Kentucky was probably in the top-5 and not far behind. The 'Cats led Alabama at halftime before the Tide got rollin' in the second half. Kentucky's defense simply ran out of gas in the fourth quarter as Alabama continued to pour it on with a power rushing attack. Texas A&M plays at LSU next week, so it might be tough to keep the Yell Leaders focused on this game as a 17-point favorite against the league's bottom-dweller. First-year head coach Will Stein can take some positives away from last week's result because his 'Cats were the better team for 30 minutes. Now, let's see them put it together for 60.
Play Kentucky
| Kentucky | 31 / 29 | +2 | 21 | 31 | -7 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Texas A&M | 49 / 10 | +39 | 8 | 35 | -26.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Kentucky | 09-12 | Alabama | +9 | 47.5 | 17-45 | Texas A&M | 09-12 | Arizona S. | -14.5 | 51.5 | 48-20 |
| | 09-05 | Youngstow. | -22.5 | 61.5 | 45-13 | | 09-05 | Missouri . | -38.5 | 53.5 | 50-0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Kentucky |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Youngstown St | -22.5 | W | 45-13 | UN | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama | 9 | L | 17-45 | OV | 47.5 | 3 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 5.5 | W | 17-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas A&M |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Missouri State | -38.5 | W | 50-0 | UN | 53.5 | -10.5 | L | 9-0 | UN | 14 | -24.5 | L | 19-0 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona State | -14.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 51.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Citadel | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/16 12:12 am |
| Utah State | 10 | 55.5 | 39.5 | | 40 | 13 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 | -12 / -2 | -15.5 / +28 |
| Utah | 45 | -26.5 | 12.5(3) | -30 | 13 | 21 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +42.5 / - | -26 / - |
We’re not sure if Utah State’s near-miss in Seattle vs. Washington last weekend was more of a buy signal on the Aggies or a sell on the Huskies (both, or neither, perhaps?). Yet before getting too carried by the improved effort of the Logan bunch, even head coach Bronco Mendenhall has lamented some of the shortcomings on his Utah State squad. After last week’s 16-14 loss to the Huskies, Mendengall said, “Quarterback scramble is our only running game, just to be blunt.” QB Grady Brosterhous spent most of the game running for his life out of the pocket, and he ended up as the Aggies’ only rusher with positive yardage when all was said and done. Though Brosterhous certainly looks no worse than original starter and BYU transfer McCae Hillstead who tossed three picks in the Idaho State opener before exiting with an arm injury that kept him out last week, he has had his own troubles with interceptions after tossing another three last week in Seattle. The scare that the Aggies put into the Huskies might also put the ranked Utes on alert, which ought to concern Mendenhall as Utah has come flying out of the gate for first-year head coach Morgan Scalley. The Utes have out-scored Idaho and Arkansas by a combined margin of 109-24 as the transition from Kyle Whittingham has proceeded without a hitch as many in Salt Lake City expected it would. Scalley was largely considered a coach-in-waiting under Whittingham and merely slid over from his role of defensive coordinator into the head coach’s seat. Further, though this matchup stopped being an annual event over a decade ago, the Utes have rarely lost focus in the past vs. any in-state foe. With various portal adds like San Jose State transfer DT Jireh Moe already having made their presence felt for another typically big and brawling Utah defense, Utah State's path forward is hard to identify, but what's more likely to decide the spread outcome is the capable Ute backups behind QB Devon Dampier and the starters. Sophomore relief pitcher Byrd Ficklin is a playmaker in his own right who has thrown five TD passes in only 47 career attempts off the bench while rushing for almost 600 yards and another ten TDs on the ground. Though we must note Utah State is 7-1 against the spread as an underdog under Mendenhall since he arrived in Logan last year, we’re willing to lay the points with the Utes as Ficklin will keep Utah’s offense moving in the second half on Saturday at Rice-Eccles. Utah is rarely going to sit on a big lead.
Play Utah
| Utah State | 15.5 / 22.5 | -7 | 41 | 34 | +6.5 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Utah | 54.5 / 12 | +42.5 | 15 | 38 | -26 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Utah State | 09-12 | @ Washingto. | +28 | 55.5 | 14-16 | Utah | 09-12 | Arkansas | -13.5 | 55.5 | 43-10 |
| | 09-05 | Idaho Sta. | -15.5 | 58.5 | 17-29 | | 09-03 | Idaho | -38 | 60.5 | 66-14 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Utah State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Idaho State | -15.5 | L | 17-29 | UN | 58.5 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | L | 10-16 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Washington U | 28 | W | 14-16 | UN | 55.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 17 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Idaho | -38 | W | 66-14 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | W | 17-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Arkansas | -13.5 | W | 43-10 | UN | 55.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | W | 29-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ball State | 20 | 49.5 | 49 | | 48 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +24 / -53 | -13.5 / +50 |
| Liberty | 28 | -14.5 | 35(1) | -15 | 36 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | +1 / -7 | -28.5 / +6 |
Football is a little easier when you're not playing Ohio State, huh? The Cardinals rebounded nicely from their Week 1 loss to the Buckeyes with a 41-17 win over FCS-level Stony Brook. Keldric Luster went 27-of-32 through the air with three touchdowns and an interception. Liberty narrowly escaped FCS-level Gardner-Webb, which is the latest baffling result for the Flames' program. Liberty needed a 54-yard touchdown pass with under three minutes remaining to earn the outright win as a 29.5-point home favorite. This program simply cannot be trusted as a big favorite under almost any circumstance. Since the latter stages of the 2022 season, the Flames have gone 5-16 against the spread as a double-digit favorite with four outright upset losses.
Play Ball State
| Ball State | 22 / 36.5 | -14.5 | 48 | 29 | +18.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Liberty | 18.5 / 21.5 | -3 | 35 | 42 | -11.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Ball State | 09-12 | Stony Bro. | -13.5 | 52 | 41-17 | Liberty | 09-12 | Gardner W. | -28.5 | 54.5 | 24-23 |
| | 09-05 | @ Ohio State | +50 | 55.5 | 3-56 | | 09-05 | @ James Mad. | +6 | 51 | 13-20 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ball State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Ohio State | 50 | L | 3-56 | OV | 55.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 28.5 | W | 3-28 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Stony Brook | -13.5 | W | 41-17 | OV | 52 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Liberty |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ James Madison | 6 | L | 13-20 | UN | 51 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Gardner Webb | -28.5 | L | 24-23 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 14-6 | OV | | | L | 17-20 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-24-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-02-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Stanford | 17 | 51.5 | 32 | | 30 | 5 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | -14.5 / - | +10 / - |
| Duke | 33 | -10 | 18.5(1) | -14.5 | 20 | 17 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +14 / +4 | -9.5 / +6 |
If this were hoops, all of the talking heads at ESPN and elsewhere would probably be gushing about Duke’s quick 2-0 start with impressive wins over American contender Tulane and Big Ten Illinois, and eager to praise Jon Scheyer. We suspect, however, that even Coach K is taking note of what is happening on the gridiron in Durham as head coach Manny Diaz continues to remind onlookers that maybe he deserved better than getting discarded like yesterday’s Racing Form at Gulfstream when Miami pushed him out a few years (nevermind the Canes’ recent success under Mario Cristobal). Though the Blue Devils prefer Wooden Awards to Heisman campaigns, anywhere else might be promoting running back Nate Sheppard, who has blasted for a combined 400+ all-purpose yards and scored five TDs in the wins over the Green Wave and the Illini. Sheppard looks to be Duke’s best runner since Steve Jones, who had some productive years for Don Coryell’s Cardinals in the early 70s. We had some concerns about San Jose State transfer QB Walker Eget, but he proved us wrong with a very efficient 15-for-21 outing with three TD passes and no picks in last week’s exciting win at Champaign-Urbana. Eget is also pinching himself, as he never had an infantry diversion like Sheppard while with the Spartans, and, so far at least, cushioning the blow of QB Darian Mensah’s defection late in the portal period to Miami. Meanwhile we don’t want to overreact to Stanford getting clocked by those rampaging Hurricanes in Palo Alto on September 4, but not sure we want to read too much into the opening win over Hawaii, either, when the Tree coughed up a 16-point lead in the fourth quarter only to rally back to win with a pair of late TDs in the last two minutes (one a scoop-and-score by LB Tevarua Tafiti) to rescue that Week Zero result. The jury, however, still remains out on Michigan transfer QB Davis Warren, who didn’t overly impress in his stint with the Wolverines, and in his career, has still tossed more picks (10) than TDs (8). We also still need a bit more proof-of-concept with new Stanford head coach Tavita Pritchard..something we already seem to have with Diaz.
Play Duke
| Stanford | 21.5 / 36 | -14.5 | 30 | 19 | +10 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Duke | 24 / 15 | +9 | 21 | 25 | -2 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Stanford | 09-04 | Miami Flo. | +24.5 | 46.5 | 6-45 | Duke | 09-12 | @ Illinois | +6 | 51.5 | 31-27 |
| | 08-29 | Hawaii | -4.5 | 48.5 | 37-27 | | 09-05 | Tulane | -9.5 | 51.5 | 17-3 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stanford |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Hawaii | -4.5 | W | 37-27 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10 | -3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24 |
| 09-04-26 | Miami Florida | 24.5 | L | 6-45 | OV | 46.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | 14 | L | 6-28 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Elon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Duke |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tulane | -9.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 51.5 | -3 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Illinois | 6 | W | 31-27 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | William & Mary | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 09/16 1:01 am |
| Western Kentucky | 7 | 58 | 42 | | 40 | 4 | 0-0 / 0-2 | 0-0 / 0-2 | 0-0 / 2-0 | - / -42.5 | - / +20.5 |
| Indiana | 56 | -44.5 | 5(2) | -39 | 5 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +45.5 / - | -49.5 / - |
Indiana handled business over FCS-level Howard as the Hoosiers have out-scored their first two opponents by a combined score of 107-16. Starting QB Josh Hoover only completed six passes in the contest, but four of those completions resulted in touchdowns. The defending champs held the Bison to 57 total yards and four first downs on 1.2 yards per play. We're hoping that Western Kentucky head coach Tyson Helton gets a nice holiday gift from the Hilltopper administration this year, because his team has been put in a brutal spot. Western Kentucky opens the season at Nevada, at Georgia and now has to travel to Bloomington to face the defending champs. College basketball teams in the SWAC typically play a murderer's row of non-conference opponents to boost the funds of the athletic department, but you rarely see it happen quite like this on the football stage. The 'Toppers have been out-scored 119-34 in their first two games against the Wolf Pack and Bulldogs with each of those first two games flying over the total. Western Kentucky hasn't played a home game since November 15 of last year. Indiana has kinda-sorta played with its food in the first two games against North Texas and Howard (0-2 ATS), but this feels like the spot where Curt Cignetti lets loose. Indiana opens its Big Ten schedule next week against Northwestern, and take a look at what the Hoosiers have done in their last two "warm-up" games before conference play. In 2024, they beat Western Illinois 77-3 and covered the spread by more than four touchdowns. Last year, the Hoosiers beat Indiana State 73-0 and covered the spread by 26 points. Western Kentucky can still make some noise in Conference-USA, but this is a brutal spot to be facing the Hoosiers.
Play Indiana
| Western Kentucky | 17 / 59.5 | -42.5 | 39 | 22 | +20.5 | 0-0 / 0-2 | 0-0 / 0-2 | 0-0 / 2-0 |
| Indiana | 53.5 / 8 | +45.5 | 4 | 47 | -49.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Western Kentucky | 09-12 | @ Georgia | +40.5 | 55.5 | 20-70 | Indiana | 09-12 | Howard | -58.5 | 68 | 55-0 |
| | 09-05 | @ Nevada | PK | 51.5 | 14-49 | | 09-05 | North Tex. | -40 | 57.5 | 52-16 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Western Kentucky |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Nevada | 0 | L | 14-49 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 7-21 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Georgia | 40.5 | L | 20-70 | OV | 55.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14 | 24.5 | L | 6-49 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Mercyhurst | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-01-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-14-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Indiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-0-1 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Texas | -40 | L | 52-16 | OV | 57.5 | -10.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -24 | L | 24-6 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Howard | -58.5 | L | 55-0 | UN | 68 | | W | 20-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-25-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana Tech | 10 | 50.5 | 37 | | 38 | 8 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +74 / -31 | -44.5 / +34.5 |
| Baylor | 31 | -20.5 | 21.5(2) | -17.5 | 22 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | +41 / - | -37.5 / - |
A little bit of luster got taken off this one after Louisiana Tech revealed that starting QB Blake Baker is dealing with a broken hand. The Bulldogs said that they do not have a timetable for his return, but it's hard to imagine he's going to be ready for this one in a non-conference setting, especially with a bye next week before conference play. La Tech was very feisty in Baton Rouge last week as they only trailed LSU 10-7 at halftime and 13-7 with under five minutes remaining in the third quarter. The Bayou Bengals eventually gained separation, but Sonny Cumbie's team gave a very nice effort. Baylor is coming off a 44-3 win over FCS-level Prairie View A&M. Without Baker, it's tough to see the Bulldogs making a significant contribution toward this total. Dating back to the end of last season, six of Baylor's last seven games have stayed under the total including each of the first two this year. Over the last two seasons, Louisiana Tech has played LSU twice and Washington State. Those three games against superior competition have seen an average of 40.0 points per game.
Play the Under
09/17 9:51 AM PDT — Both starting quarterbacks are questionable. Louisiana Tech's Blake Baker is dealing with a fractured hand, while Baylor's DJ Lagway is doubtful with an ankle injury.
| Louisiana Tech | 47 / 25.5 | +21.5 | 39 | 31 | -5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Baylor | 30 / 10 | +20 | 22 | 36 | -15.5 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 |
| Louisiana Tech | 09-12 | @ LSU | +34.5 | 55 | 14-45 | Baylor | 09-12 | Prairie V. | -37.5 | 55.5 | 44-3 |
| | 09-05 | Northwest. | -44.5 | 56.5 | 80-6 | | 09-05 | @ Auburn | +6.5 | 58.5 | 16-17 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Louisiana Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northwestern State | -44.5 | W | 80-6 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 63-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ LSU | 34.5 | W | 14-45 | OV | 55 | 9.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 21.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Baylor |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Auburn | 6.5 | W | 16-17 | UN | 58.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Prairie View A&M | -37.5 | W | 44-3 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 34-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mississippi St | 24 | 60 | 15.5 | | 17 | 19 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +49 / +25 | -28.5 / -1 |
| South Carolina | 31 | -3.5 | 17.5(3) | -1 | 16 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +46.5 / - | -40 / - |
Get your popcorn for this one. Plenty of eyes will be focused on Columbia because this SEC showdown features arguably the best QB matchup of the day. The Gamecocks have out-scored their first two opponents - Kent State and Towson - by a combined margin of 102-9. Third-year QB LaNorris Sellers is learning his way around the offense of new OC Kendal Briles. Sellers went 19-of-23 through the air in the opener against the Flashes and he added 119 yards and a touchdown last week against the Tigers. You know who else is familiar with Briles' innovative offense? Mississippi State head coach Jeff Lebby. Why do they know each other so well? Lebby is Briles' brother in law. These teams haven't met since 2023, so outside of that unique family tree, the Gamecocks and Bulldogs don't have too much familiarity. Mississippi State is coming off a 38-13 thrashing of Minnesota that was probably worse than the final score would indicate. Taylor threw three touchdown passes and ran for 86 yards, showing the Big Ten entry why he's one of the best under-the-radar quarterbacks in the country. If Hail State can win this one on the road, he won't be under-the-radar for very long. Shane Beamer's Gamecocks got some good news this week as Dylan Stewart and Jacarrius Peak are both showing progress after missing each of the first two games. The excitement around Taylor is absolutely justified and he's going to be a blast to watch, but South Carolina has already had their version of Taylor in the program for the last three years. The Gamecock defenders know what it feels like to try and tackle a 6-foot-4, 230-pound battering ram for a quarterback who also has a rocket arm. After a disappointing 2025 campaign, Sellers is poised to pick up a statement win at home.
Play South Carolina
09/17 9:53 AM PDT — South Carolina's Jacarrius Peak (right guard) and Dylan Stewart (defensive end) are both expected to play for the first time this season after missing each of the first two games.
| Mississippi St | 50 / 13 | +37 | 16 | 34 | -15 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| South Carolina | 51 / 4.5 | +46.5 | 16 | 52 | -40 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Mississippi St | 09-12 | @ Minnesota. | -1 | 53.5 | 38-13 | South Carolina | 09-12 | Towson | -44.5 | 57.5 | 45-9 |
| | 09-05 | UL Monroe | -28.5 | 54.5 | 62-13 | | 09-05 | Kent State | -35.5 | 53 | 57-0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mississippi St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UL Monroe | -28.5 | W | 62-13 | OV | 54.5 | -7.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 13.5 | -17 | W | 41-3 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Minnesota U | -1 | W | 38-13 | UN | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | W | 28-6 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Tennessee Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Kent State | -35.5 | W | 57-0 | OV | 53 | -9.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21 | W | 29-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Towson | -44.5 | L | 45-9 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| East Carolina | 20 | 49 | 34.5 | -1.5 | 33 | 40 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | -3 / -38 | -6.5 / +28 |
| Old Dominion | 27 | -2.5 | 37(1) | | 37 | 18 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +21 / -23 | -41.5 / +18 |
East Carolina has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings in this regional matchup, with the last one being a 20-14 road win at Old Dominion in 2024. The Pirates have gotten off to a rough start this year, getting crushed by Alabama in the opener then losing at home to App State as a seven-point favorite. East Carolina only led for five minutes in that contest as App State essentially controlled things from start to finish. Wake Forest transfer Mitch Griffis hasn't been able to provide the spark at quarterback after the Pirates' offense was gutted after last year. Old Dominion returns home after a quirky loss at Virginia Tech. The Monarchs held a +1.2 yards per play advantage, but only ran 52 plays compared to 86 by the Hokies. ODU lost three fumbles, including one that was returned for a touchdown. From a power ratings' standpoint, we're showing a little bit of value on ECU but there's a decent chance that we simply haven't downgraded them enough thus far. This offense is a shell of what it has been in years past with very few returning pieces on the roster or in the coach’s booth. ODU or pass, in our opinion.
Play Old Dominion
| East Carolina | 17 / 37.5 | -20.5 | 31 | 24 | +11 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Old Dominion | 26 / 27 | -1 | 36 | 37 | -12 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| East Carolina | 09-12 | Appalachi. | -6.5 | 55.5 | 24-27 | Old Dominion | 09-12 | @ Virginia . | +18 | 47.5 | 21-44 |
| | 09-05 | @ Alabama | +28 | 52.5 | 10-48 | | 09-05 | Norfolk St | -41.5 | 52.5 | 31-10 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| East Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Alabama | 28 | L | 10-48 | OV | 52.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 16.5 | L | 7-38 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Appalachian St | -6.5 | L | 24-27 | UN | 55.5 | -3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13 | -4 | L | 10-17 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | NC Central | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Old Dominion |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Norfolk St | -41.5 | L | 31-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 18 | L | 21-44 | OV | 47.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | L | 6-34 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida Intl | 27 | 62.5 | 41 | | 42 | 45 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +13 / -10 | -8 / +14.5 |
| Florida Atlantic | 31 | -5 | 36.5(1) | -5.5 | 37 | 29 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +8 / -45 | +4.5 / +25.5 |
Florida Atlantic's seven-game winning streak was snapped as the Panthers earned a 38-28 home win last season. Each of the last five meetings have gone over the total. Dating back to 2018, the winning team in this game has scored an average of 45.3 points per game. As we go to publish on Tuesday night, most 'books are split between FAU -6.5 and -7. At +7, we have some interest in the Panthers. Florida International didn't need to break much of a sweat in last week's non-conference win over Buffalo. JJ Kohl threw for 367 yards and three touchdowns with no interceptions. If you remember, FIU probably deserved a better fate against South Florida in the opener after dominating the box score in that one. Florida Atlantic is coming off a nice home win over Navy last week, but the Owls have allowed 96 points in their first two games. Dating back to mid-October of last year, here's how many points FAU has allowed over its last eight games: 48, 42, 21, 35, 48, 42, 66 and 30. Is that a team you want to lay a touchdown with? We'll politely decline, for now.
Play Florida International
| Florida Intl | 21 / 19.5 | +1.5 | 42 | 37 | +3.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Florida Atlantic | 29.5 / 48 | -18.5 | 37 | 22 | +15 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Florida Intl | 09-12 | Buffalo U | -8 | 47.5 | 33-20 | Florida Atlantic | 09-12 | Navy | +4.5 | 59.5 | 38-30 |
| | 09-05 | @ South Flo. | +14.5 | 53.5 | 9-19 | | 09-05 | @ Florida | +25.5 | 59.5 | 21-66 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 09-13-25 | Florida Atlantic | 28 | 56 | 24 | 31/135 | 33/51/3/343 | 1/0 |
| Florida Intl | 38 | -2 | 17 | 40/224 | 18/24/0/184 | 4/1 |
| Florida Intl |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ South Florida | 14.5 | W | 9-19 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-6 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Buffalo U | -8 | W | 33-20 | OV | 47.5 | -3 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10 | -5.5 | W | 21-6 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Long Island University | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-07-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-13-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida Atlantic |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Florida | 25.5 | L | 21-66 | OV | 59.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | L | 14-38 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Navy | 4.5 | W | 38-30 | OV | 59.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | 3 | W | 31-7 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Texas Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Charlotte | 20 | 52.5 | 52 | | 51 | 9 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | -2 / -32 | -20.5 / +44 |
| Appalachian St | 38 | -16.5 | 38.5(2) | -15.5 | 40 | 31 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +52 / +3 | -21 / +6.5 |
App State earned a 34-11 road win in Charlotte last season as a 3.5-point favorite. This year's spread looks a little different, doesn't it? The 49ers have lost 11-straight games, including one as a three-touchdown favorite against The Citadel in this year's opener. Charlotte did cover the 44.5-point spread last week at Ole Miss, but that had more to do with the Rebels' disinterest than anything the 49ers were providing. App State has won-and-covered its first two games by an impressive margin. The Mountaineers covered the number by 31 points in the opener against Maine, then beat East Carolina outright as a 6.5-point 'dog. The Mountaineers only trailed for five minutes against the Pirates, essentially controlling that game from wire-to-wire. We continue to sing the praise of well-traveled QB Malachi Singleton, who appears to have found a nice landing spot in Boone. We have no interest in backing Charlotte any time soon, but from a power ratings' perspective, this one is getting a little steep. We do have some interest in the total, however, under the belief that Singleton and the Mountaineers' offense will do most of the heavy lifting.
Play the Over
| Charlotte | 25 / 42 | -17 | 51 | 32 | +12 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Appalachian St | 41 / 13.5 | +27.5 | 41 | 43 | -7.5 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Charlotte | 09-12 | @ Mississip. | +44 | 59.5 | 9-41 | Appalachian St | 09-12 | @ East Caro. | +6.5 | 55.5 | 27-24 |
| | 09-05 | Citadel | -20.5 | 49 | 41-43 | | 09-05 | Maine | -21 | 53.5 | 55-3 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 08-29-25 | Appalachian St | 34 | -3 | 32 | 38/182 | 33/50/0/404 | 1/1 |
| Charlotte | 11 | 48.5 | 15 | 29/76 | 13/25/1/142 | 1/1 |
| Charlotte |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Citadel | -20.5 | L | 41-43 | OV | 49 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Mississippi | 44 | W | 9-41 | UN | 59.5 | 13.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14.5 | 27.5 | W | 0-27 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Appalachian St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Maine | -21 | W | 55-3 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ East Carolina | 6.5 | W | 27-24 | UN | 55.5 | 3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13 | 4 | W | 17-10 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Marshall | 27 | -4 | 39.5 | -6.5 | 38 | 49 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | +2 / -45 | -11.5 / +23 |
| Missouri State | 20 | 52.5 | 47(1) | | 47 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +34 / -50 | -16.5 / +38.5 |
Missouri State earned a 21-20 road win at Marshall last season as a 7.5-point road 'dog. Marshall's hopes of getting some revenge for that loss took a big hit last week against Middle Tennessee as starting QB Carlos Del Rio-Wilson suffered a shoulder injury. Early injury reports have him listed as questionable for this clash with the Bears, but his status is very important to monitor through out the week. After losing 50-0 at Texas A&M to open the year, Missouri State recovered with a 48-14 home win over FCS-level Lindenwood last week. There's not much to learn from those two results, so the Bears largely remain a mystery in the betting market. If Del Rio-Wilson is unable to go, we still have some mild interest in the Herd. Tony Gibson strikes us as the kind of coach that can play up the revenge angle from last year. Fifth-year senior Zion Turner has experience, so while there is a drop-off from the talented Del Rio-Wilson, the learning curve of this offense won't be steep.
Play Marshall
| Marshall | 14 / 35.5 | -21.5 | 37 | 31 | +6 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Missouri State | 24 / 32 | -8 | 47 | 32 | +11 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Marshall | 09-12 | Middle Te. | -11.5 | 56 | 28-26 | Missouri State | 09-12 | Lindenwood | -16.5 | 53.5 | 48-14 |
| | 09-05 | @ Penn State | +23 | 53.5 | 0-45 | | 09-05 | @ Texas A&M | +38.5 | 53.5 | 0-50 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 09-06-25 | Missouri State | 21 | 54.5 | 18 | 35/91 | 22/32/1/388 | 2/0 |
| Marshall | 20 | -8.5 | 12 | 33/191 | 13/24/1/83 | 0/0 |
| Marshall |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:0-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Penn State | 23 | L | 0-45 | UN | 53.5 | 7 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Middle Tenn St | -11.5 | L | 28-26 | UN | 56 | -5.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | L | 14-13 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Gardner Webb | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Missouri State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Texas A&M | 38.5 | L | 0-50 | UN | 53.5 | 10.5 | W | 0-9 | UN | 14 | 24.5 | W | 0-19 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Lindenwood | -16.5 | W | 48-14 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-14-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-27-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia State | 16 | 50.5 | 47 | | 49 | 41 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +49 / +14 | -28.5 / +7.5 |
| Central Florida | 38 | -17.5 | 28(3) | -22 | 27 | 17 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +67 / -5 | -43.5 / +7 |
Why hello Georgia State! The Panthers were power-rated by many as one of the worst teams in college football heading into this season, but Georgia State is 2-0 straight-up and against the spread with those covers coming by 20.5 and 21.5 points. This is a team that went 1-11 straight-up, 2-10 against the spread with the lone win coming against FCS-level Murray State. Cameran Brown threw for 253 yards in last week's upset win over Kennesaw State. There was nothing flukey about that victory as the Panthers out-gained the Owls by 151 yards with a 23-17 advantage in first downs. We're still scratching our heads at what we saw in Pittsburgh on Saturday after UCF laid a complete egg in the Steel City. In a game with a closing total in the mid-50s, Pitt and UCF combined for 521 yards and 24 first downs with 14 punts. The Knights finished with 20 rushing yards against a defense that isn't typically well-regarded in the ACC. The Knights also lost QB Alonza Barnett III to a hamstring injury and he is not expected to play in this one. Former Florida International QB Keyone Jenkins is expected to get the nod, and he's more of a pocket passer compared to the mobile Barnett. That move may unlock a few more things in Scott Frost's playbook. The Knights' offense can't look any worse than it did last week against Pitt.
| Georgia State | 45 / 13.5 | +31.5 | 51 | 48 | -10.5 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Central Florida | 40 / 9 | +31 | 26 | 36 | -18.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Georgia State | 09-12 | @ Kennesaw . | +7.5 | 55.5 | 31-17 | Central Florida | 09-12 | @ Pittsburg. | +7 | 55 | 7-12 |
| | 09-04 | N. Caroli. | -28.5 | 58.5 | 59-10 | | 09-03 | Bethune C. | -43.5 | 58.5 | 73-6 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Georgia State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | N. Carolina A&T | -28.5 | W | 59-10 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kennesaw State | 7.5 | W | 31-17 | UN | 55.5 | 2.5 | W | 6-3 | UN | 12.5 | 4.5 | W | 21-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Central Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Bethune Cookman | -43.5 | W | 73-6 | OV | 58.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 38-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 7 | W | 7-12 | UN | 55 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 13 | 4.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia Southern | 31 | 51.5 | 39.5 | | 39 | 18 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 | +31 / -15 | -28.5 / +19.5 |
| Jacksonville St | 27 | -3.5 | 36.5(2) | -5 | 37 | 39 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | +42 / -14 | -22.5 / +4 |
These cross-conference foes met at Georgia Southern last year with the Eagles protecting their nest with a 41-34 home win. Jacksonville State let a good opportunity slip away last week in Ohio, falling to the Bobcats who were down to their fourth-string quarterback at one point. On the kinda-sorta bright side, the Gamecocks' Week 0 loss to North Dakota State is beginning to age a little bit better than originally anticipated as the Bison continue to look dominant. Along with NDSU, Jacksonville State is one of only a few teams in the country that is playing for the fourth-straight week. Georgia Southern was involved in a weird 22-7 loss at Clemson that featured lightning delays and sloppy play on both sides. At +3.5, we have some interest in the Eagles. It's only mid-September, but a little bit of early-season fatigue may be setting in for Jacksonville State. The Gamecocks have already had two difficult road trips - One that resulted in a dominant loss and another that went to overtime. Georgia Southern QB Max Johnson threw the ball 47 times last week at Clemson. If your legs are feeling a little shaky, Clay Helton's pass-happy offense will put those to the test.
Play Georgia Southern
| Georgia Southern | 19 / 11 | +8 | 38 | 37 | -4.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Jacksonville St | 27.7 / 23 | +4.7 | 37 | 41 | -5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Georgia Southern | 09-12 | @ Clemson | +19.5 | 54.5 | 7-22 | Jacksonville St | 09-12 | @ Ohio | +1.5 | 49 | 27-29 |
| | 09-05 | Charlesto. | -28.5 | 51.5 | 31-0 | | 09-05 | Eastern K. | -22.5 | 51.5 | 49-7 |
| | | | | | | | 08-29 | @ North Dak. | +6.5 | 46.5 | 7-33 |
|
| 09-13-25 | Jacksonville St | 34 | 58 | 22 | 42/214 | 17/25/1/180 | 1/0 |
| Georgia Southern | 41 | -3 | 24 | 40/221 | 16/24/0/191 | 1/1 |
| Georgia Southern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Charleston Southern | -28.5 | W | 31-0 | UN | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 24-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Clemson | 19.5 | W | 7-22 | UN | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11 | W | 7-16 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Jacksonville St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:2-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ North Dakota State | 6.5 | L | 7-33 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 3.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Eastern Kentucky | -22.5 | W | 49-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Ohio | 1.5 | L | 27-29 | OV | 49 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10 | 0.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-07-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-13-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nevada | 27 | -3.5 | 41 | -4.5 | 40 | 55 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +11 / - | +2.5 / - |
| Middle Tenn St | 19 | 50.5 | 46.5(1) | | 48 | 37 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 | +24 / -2 | -22.5 / +11.5 |
This item might have skipped by any wire service reports, but Nevada was minus starting QB Carter Jones with an unspecified arm/shoulder injury for last week’s visit by FCS powerhouse and defending champ Montana State, which extended its win streak to 17 with a 20-7 win in Reno. Important news, there, because the Wolf Pack struggled to move with any consistency behind backups Luke Duncan and AJ Bianco. It’s also worth noting that the Big Sky Bobcats are better than a lot of Group of 6 FBS entries, including perhaps all of Conference USA and teams like Middle Tennessee. So we’re not ready to downgrade Nevada too much for last week’s result. Assuming dual-threat Jones gets the go-ahead to return to action, a quick recovery by the ‘Pack could be in order, especially since they’ve already thrashed one C-USA contender Western Kentucky 49-14 in the opener. The new-found Nevada infantry rolled for 323 rushing yards against the Hilltoppers, and explosive sophomore running back Dominic Kelley has already produced 236 yards rushing this season. Kelley’s presence is reminding some in the Sierra foothills of the many productive ball-carriers during Chris Ault’s heyday in Reno running the Pistol. Keep in mind, too, that the Pack has also been stewing for a year since blowing a late 13-0 lead at Mackay Stadium vs. the Blue Raiders last September, allowing MTSU to steal the win with two TDs in the last six minutes. Importantly, that was before QB Jones emerged to provide a spark for the Nevada offense last October. Besides, the Blue Raiders remain a tough sell, being poor value since the ill-advised hire of Derek Mason and jettisoning of the relatively successful Rick Stockstill after the 2023 campaign, winning outright only seven of 26 times since. Early returns have been a bit more encouraging the past two weeks for Mason, as sophomore QB Roman Gagliano, who got a trial run late last season when predecessor Nicholas Vattiato went down with injury, has been fairly productive. Kansas State transfer RB Antonio Martin (5.5 yards per carry) has been providing something of a ground diversion, though remember this was one of the most-imbalanced offenses in the nation a year ago. Yet, as MTSU has often done under Mason, it blew a chance at a rare win last week vs. Marshall, unable to take advantage of a carousel of Thundering Herd QBs, and might need Carter Jones to remain sidelined for the ‘Pack to have a better chance this week. Thus, for us, this is a semi-provisional recommendation on Nevada, assuming QB Jones is available.
Play Nevada
| Nevada | 28 / 17 | +11 | 39 | 46 | +2.5 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Middle Tenn St | 32 / 21 | +11 | 49 | 46 | -5.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Nevada | 09-12 | Montana S. | +4.5 | 51.5 | 7-20 | Middle Tenn St | 09-12 | @ Marshall | +11.5 | 56 | 26-28 |
| | 09-05 | Western K. | PK | 51.5 | 49-14 | | 09-05 | Murray St. | -22.5 | 55.5 | 38-14 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 09-13-25 | Middle Tenn St | 14 | 50 | 23 | 30/105 | 27/44/1/247 | 0/0 |
| Nevada | 13 | -9 | 16 | 35/203 | 14/25/2/166 | 0/0 |
| Nevada |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Kentucky | 0 | W | 49-14 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 21-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Montana State | 4.5 | L | 7-20 | UN | 51.5 | | L | 0-10 | OV | | | L | 0-17 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Middle Tenn St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Murray State | -22.5 | W | 38-14 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Marshall | 11.5 | W | 26-28 | UN | 56 | 5.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | W | 13-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-13-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ohio | 17 | 49.5 | 40.5 | | 40 | 38 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +2 / -28 | -1.5 / +23.5 |
| South Alabama | 31 | -7 | 41.5(1) | PK | 42 | 32 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +25 / -4 | -13.5 / +10 |
When Ohio broke spring camp, it looked like freshman Levi Davis was going to be the Bobcats' fourth-string quarterback. By most indications, he may now be the starter. Nick Poulos and Matt Vezza were both injured in last week's overtime win against Jacksonville State, leading the way for Davis to make his college debut. There has been a pretty strong move in South Alabama's favor in the betting market this week, leading us to believe that Davis will likely get the nod. The Jaguars will likely be feisty after letting a nice opportunity at Tulane slip away. Closing as a 9.5-point 'dog, South Alabama largely out-played Tulane but the Jaguars couldn't stop the Green Wave rushing attack when it mattered most in the final minutes. If Major Applewhite can pick his team off the mat and get a focused effort this week, the Jaguars figure to be the more-talented team in this contest. Bishop Davenport went 22-of-32 for 296 yards with two touchdowns and no interceptions last week at Tulane, showing that he's probably on a talent level that is a step above where the Bobcats are at.
Play South Alabama
| Ohio | 25 / 38 | -13 | 40 | 27 | +11 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| South Alabama | 31.5 / 21 | +10.5 | 43 | 44 | -2 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Ohio | 09-12 | Jacksonvi. | -1.5 | 49 | 29-27 | South Alabama | 09-12 | @ Tulane | +10 | 48 | 24-28 |
| | 09-05 | @ Nebraska | +23.5 | 47.5 | 21-49 | | 09-05 | SE Louisi. | -13.5 | 54 | 39-14 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ohio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Nebraska | 23.5 | L | 21-49 | OV | 47.5 | 7 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10 | 13.5 | W | 13-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Jacksonville St | -1.5 | W | 29-27 | OV | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10 | -0.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Stonehill | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-03-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-0-1 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-0-1 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Louisiana | -13.5 | W | 39-14 | UN | 54 | | W | 19-7 | OV | | | W | 22-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Tulane | 10 | W | 24-28 | OV | 48 | 3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | 6.5 | W | 10-14 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-20-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Western Michigan | 27 | -7.5 | 34.5 | -9.5 | 36 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +35 / -1 | -29.5 / +27.5 |
| Rice | 14 | 43.5 | 45(1) | | 44 | 3 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | +28 / -52 | -22.5 / +44.5 |
Notre Dame's defense is going to make a lot of teams look bad this season, but Rice's issues against the Irish were all self-inflicted. The Owls lost four fumbles in last week's 52-0 loss in South Bend, including one that was returned for a touchdown 14 seconds into the game. Running a modified version of the option, Owls' QB Jacurri Brown was held to 64 yards through the air and just 32 yards on 16 carries (2.0 yards per carry). The Broncos aren't going to be confused with the Irish anytime soon, but things aren't going to get much easier for the Owls in this one. Western Michigan rebounded nicely from the heartbreaker in Ann Arbor with a 35-point home win over FCS-level Monmouth. Dating back to the end of last season, Western Michigan has covered the number in seven-straight games. This is a big number for the Broncos to lay with a low total in the mid-40s, but that's the only direction we can look.
Play Western Michigan
| Western Michigan | 30.5 / 13.5 | +17 | 36 | 33 | -1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Rice | 15.5 / 27.5 | -12 | 44 | 29 | +11 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Western Michigan | 09-12 | Monmouth | -29.5 | 54.5 | 49-14 | Rice | 09-12 | @ Notre Dame | +44.5 | 54.5 | 0-52 |
| | 09-05 | @ Michigan | +27.5 | 50.5 | 12-13 | | 09-05 | Houston B. | -22.5 | 47.5 | 31-3 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Western Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Michigan | 27.5 | W | 12-13 | UN | 50.5 | 7 | W | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Monmouth | -29.5 | W | 49-14 | OV | 54.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rice |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Houston Baptist | -22.5 | W | 31-3 | UN | 47.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Notre Dame | 44.5 | L | 0-52 | UN | 54.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14 | 26.5 | L | 0-42 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida | 31 | -2.5 | 11 | -2 | 13 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +47 / - | -38.5 / - |
| Auburn | 24 | 53.5 | 16(3) | | 16 | 47 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | +35 / - | -32 / - |
Much like another SEC game this week (Kentucky vs Texas A&M), it's been ages since the Gators and Tigers have taken the field. Florida and Auburn have played a grand total of one time in the last 15 years - A 24-13 Gator win in 2019. Both programs are off to 2-0 head starts in their new regime. Jon Sumrall's Gators have out-scored Florida Atlantic and Campbell by a combined margin of 118-24. This should be a fantastic game and our power ratings have this lined as a pick'em, but we're inclined to side with the visitors from Gainesville. Sumrall will generate most of the headlines, but the OC-QB combo of Buster Faulkner and Aaron Philo have been as-good-as-advertised thus far. Paired together at Georgia Tech, Philo's learning curve in a new environment was as easy as it gets. The country fell in love with the Yellow Jackets' offense last year led by QB Haynes King and RB Jamal Haynes. Well, the duo of Philo and Gators' running back Jadan Baugh might be as good, if not better, under Faulkner's guidance. Dating back to the end of last year, Baugh has rushed for an average of 164.5 yards per game over his last four contests (including vs Tennessee and Florida State last year). Don't forget, even though Baylor only scored a total of 16 points against Auburn in the opener, the Bears had 436 total yards and 27 first downs. There were plenty of plays to be made against the Tigers' defense in that contest. We trust Philo and Co. to do a better job in this one.
Play Florida
| Florida | 59 / 12 | +47 | 14 | 46 | -38.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Auburn | 30 / 12 | +18 | 16 | 34 | -19.5 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 |
| Florida | 09-12 | Campbell | -51.5 | 66.5 | 52-3 | Auburn | 09-12 | So Missis. | -32 | 56.5 | 43-8 |
| | 09-05 | Florida A. | -25.5 | 59.5 | 66-21 | | 09-05 | Baylor | -6.5 | 58.5 | 17-16 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Florida Atlantic | -25.5 | W | 66-21 | OV | 59.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Campbell | -51.5 | L | 52-3 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 45-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Auburn |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Baylor | -6.5 | L | 17-16 | UN | 58.5 | -1.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | So Mississippi | -32 | W | 43-8 | UN | 56.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 27-8 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Samford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Connecticut | 27 | -3.5 | 40 | -7.5 | 41 | 23 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +12.5 / - | -5.5 / - |
| So Mississippi | 24 | 54.5 | 48.5(1) | | 48 | 16 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +46 / -35 | -19.5 / +32 |
We'll keep this one short-and-sweet: This is a good game to keep an eye on just to see where each program is at in their first year in a new regime. Both teams beat up on an FCS-level opponent in the opener. Both teams got crushed by a Power Four opponent last week. Nothing out-of-the-ordinary has happened thus far at either program. Oddsmakers have opened this game directly in line with our numbers. When there's not much to work with, there's not much to work with. If push came to shove, our best look would be toward the under. UConn QB Kalieb Osbourne has been the Huskies' leading rusher in both contests this season, which is a little concerning. Running backsKenji Christian and Trey Cornist combined for 25 yards on 15 carries last week against Maryland. This Southern Miss defense is not on the Big Ten's level, but UConn's offense didn't bring much to the table last week.
| Connecticut | 35 / 22.5 | +12.5 | 42 | 39 | -5.5 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| So Mississippi | 28.5 / 23 | +5.5 | 47 | 36 | +6.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Connecticut | 09-12 | Maryland | +11 | 52.5 | 14-38 | So Mississippi | 09-12 | @ Auburn | +32 | 56.5 | 8-43 |
| | 09-05 | Lafayette | -21.5 | 51.5 | 56-7 | | 09-05 | Alcorn St. | -19.5 | 51.5 | 49-3 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Connecticut |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lafayette | -21.5 | W | 56-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Maryland | 11 | L | 14-38 | UN | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 7 | L | 7-17 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| So Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Alcorn State | -19.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Auburn | 32 | L | 8-43 | UN | 56.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 8-27 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-06-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| West Virginia | 23 | 51.5 | 26 | | 27 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | +26 / - | -31.5 / - |
| Virginia | 27 | -10.5 | 18(0) | -8 | 17 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +41 / - | -25.5 / - |
At Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte. Virginia eased its way back onto the ACC radar with a 59-3 home win over FCS-level Norfolk State on Friday. The Cavaliers were coming off an early-season bye after beating NC State at home in Week 0 at the end of August. Transfer QB Beau Pribula enjoyed another productive night after going 12-of-14 for 162 yards with three touchdowns through the air. The running back duo of Xay Davis and Noah Vaughn combined for 188 yards on just 19 carries against the Spartans (9.9 yards per carry). West Virginia is also 2-0 after the Mountaineers beat FCS-level Tennessee-Martin. WVU was up 21-0 less than ten minutes into the game and Rich Rodriguez took his foot off the gas after that. Oklahoma transfer Michael Hawkins Jr. was the Mountaineers' leading passer and rusher with 96 yards and two touchdowns on the ground on just six carries. Our numbers are in line with where this game has opened, but at +10.5, we can only look toward the Mountaineers. These teams run a similar style with a mobile quarterback, so both defenses are going to have a pretty good idea what to look for. From a talent perspective, there's not much separating these squads. We would have liked to see a little more from West Virginia in the opener against Coastal Carolina, but perhaps Rich Rodriguez was saving a thing or two for this one.
Play West Virginia
| West Virginia | 41.5 / 15.5 | +26 | 27 | 50 | -31.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Virginia | 46.5 / 5.5 | +41 | 17 | 37 | -25.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| West Virginia | 09-12 | Tenn Mart. | -41.5 | 57 | 52-7 | Virginia | 09-11 | Norfolk St | -47 | 56.5 | 59-3 |
| | 09-05 | Coastal C. | -21 | 54.5 | 31-24 | | 08-29 | NC State | -4 | 50.5 | 34-8 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| West Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Coastal Carolina | -21 | L | 31-24 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Tenn Martin | -41.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 57 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-0-1 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | NC State | -4 | W | 34-8 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -2.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Norfolk St | -47 | W | 59-3 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 28-3 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-23-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Virginia Tech | 27 | -2.5 | 18 | -4 | 18 | 36 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | +46.5 / - | -36.5 / - |
| Maryland | 20 | 53.5 | 24(2) | | 23 | 41 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +62 / +24 | -45.5 / -11 |
Just when Mike Locksley thought it was safe, James Franklin has the opportunity to get one last laugh. These two fiery head coaches developed quite the rivalry when Franklin was at Penn State, and well before that. Locksley and Franklin were assistants on Ralph Friedgen's staff in College Park in 2001. Depending on who you ask and what mood they are in, most believe Franklin enjoyed being a Terp and wanted to remain a member of the program for a while. When he ran out of opportunities, he left for Vanderbilt (then Penn State, then Virginia Tech), eventually leaving the door open for Locksley to get the nod in Maryland. Franklin's Nittany Lion teams traditionally crushed Locksley's Terps, with the last meeting coming in 2024 (a 44-7 PSU win). Should we expect a different outcome in this one? We're inclined to say no. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing and expecting a different result. We've seen the Maryland script over and over and over again. Until the Terps actually get over the hump, they are very difficult to back in these spots. In 2023, Maryland opened the year 5-0 then lost four-straight games, including two as a two-touchdown favorite. In 2024, Maryland started 3-1 (lone loss was by a field goal), then went 1-7 after that. Last year, Maryland opened 4-0 then lost eight-straight games. The Terps can look like the best team in college football against Hampton and UConn, but until they actually start winning some of these marquee games, it's Hokies or pass.
| Virginia Tech | 58.5 / 12 | +46.5 | 18 | 46 | -36.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Maryland | 50 / 7 | +43 | 23 | 48 | -28.5 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Virginia Tech | 09-12 | Old Domin. | -18 | 47.5 | 44-21 | Maryland | 09-12 | @ Connectic. | -11 | 52.5 | 38-14 |
| | 09-05 | VMI | -54.5 | 60.5 | 73-3 | | 09-05 | Hampton | -45.5 | 56.5 | 62-0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Virginia Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | VMI | -54.5 | W | 73-3 | OV | 60.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 45-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Old Dominion | -18 | W | 44-21 | OV | 47.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-3 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | W | 34-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-02-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Maryland |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Hampton | -45.5 | W | 62-0 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 17-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Connecticut | -11 | W | 38-14 | UN | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -7 | W | 17-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Colorado | 17 | 48 | 26 | | 25 | 55 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +31 / +1 | -38.5 / +6.5 |
| Northwestern | 26 | -3.5 | 20(2) | -8 | 21 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | +16 / - | -14 / - |
We’re not sure how many teary eyes there might be in Evanston on Saturday for this final football game at the makeshift, lakeside Martin Stadium before the rebuilt Ryan Field makes its grand opening for the visit of Penn State on October 2. Northwestern head coach David Braun has been dealing with a spate of early-season injuries, and the week off after the opening win over South Dakota State (an annual FCS contender) probably came at a good time. Preliminary returns on the new Chip Kelly offense were promising as the attack was superbly balanced against the Jackrabbits as the Purple ‘Cats generated 224 yards on the ground and 273 more through the air. Well-traveled QB Aidan Chiles, previously at Oregon State and Michigan State but looking well-versed in the opener, orchestrated a 71-yard TD bomb to productive holdover WR Griffin Wade, who caught 71 passes in the pre-Kelly offense a year ago. Meanwhile, the marketplace looks a bit slow to buy on the possibility of any renaissance for Deion Sanders at Colorado after the Buffs have broken 2-0 from the gate. We suppose the Deion love is always apt to start flowing again with each win and every Aflac commercial with Nick Saban, but we need some more convincing than the unsightly 14-13 win over a vastly disappointing Georgia Tech in the opener (a game the Yellow Jackets should never have lost) and routing Big Sky also-ran Weber State, which changed coaches after a disappointing 2025. More evidence needed, too, about QB Julian Lewis, who was able to get the ball downfield vs. the Big Sky rep en route to four TD passes, but was limited to dump-offs and flares in the opener vs. a legit FBS entry. The supposedly-upgraded Buffaloes’ infantry shouldn't spook a robust Wildcat stop unit that dealt with various high-powered Big Ten offenses last fall and more than held its own with plenty of veteran returnees on hand for Braun’s rugged platoon that allowed under 20 points per game a year ago.
Play the Under
| Colorado | 33 / 17 | +16 | 25 | 37 | -16 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Northwestern | 34 / 18 | +16 | 22 | 55 | -14 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 |
| Colorado | 09-12 | Weber Sta. | -38.5 | 57.5 | 52-21 | Northwestern | 09-05 | South Dak. | -14 | 49.5 | 34-18 |
| | 09-03 | @ Georgia T. | +6.5 | 53 | 14-13 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Colorado |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Georgia Tech | 6.5 | W | 14-13 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Weber State | -38.5 | L | 52-21 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 21-7 | OV | | | W | 42-14 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Northwestern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-0 , O/U:0-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-0 , O/U:0-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | South Dakota St | -14 | W | 34-18 | OV | 49.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 10-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-25-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-02-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Mexico | 18 | 45.5 | 28 | | 29 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +47 / - | -27 / - |
| Oklahoma | 35 | -21.5 | 10.5(3) | -20.5 | 9 | 13 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | +51 / -7 | -41 / -5 |
Needless to say there were a lot of disappointed fans around the country last week who were counting upon Oklahoma to finish the job in Ann Arbor after the referees got in the way of Western Michigan completing the week before. It didn’t work for the Sooners (or their backers), however, and now Sooners’ head coach Brent Venables has to deal with the possibility of OU being out of the College Football Playoff picture before Columbus Day with Georgia and Texas on deck after this week. There’s also the matter of this potentially-tricky encounter with Jason Eck’s underrated Lobos team that has had “sandwich game” written all over it from when the schedule was announced. Keeping his OU troops focused on New Mexico and not looking ahead to the Bulldogs and Longhorns might be a bit easier for Venables after the loss at Michigan, and we would suspect that QB John Mateer, with his longshot Heisman candidacy now close to tatters, should be primed after his underwhelming effort vs. the Wolverines. Mateer was responsible for the ill-advised pick that set up Kyle Whittingham’s troops for the game-winning TD. It’s worth noting, however, that there is some evidence the scrappy Lobos might not be completely out of their depth after winning at UCLA (when the Bruins were admittedly at their low ebb last September) and competitive efforts vs. the same Big Ten Wolverines, plus PJ Fleck’s Minnesota in the Rate Bowl in Phoenix last year. The season-ending elbow injury to one of last fall’s heroes, QB Jack Layne, has merely allowed the clever Eck to get creative and rotate a trio of QBs including Oregon transfer Luke Moga (already three TD passes) and "sockless wonder" James Laubstein, who simply wants to run and scored a pair of TDs via the overland route in the September 5 blowout of Central Michigan. We also caution OU backers not to confuse New Mexico with nearby UTEP, which was overwhelmed in the opener at Norman and rates several levels below the Lobos. Since arriving in Albuquerque last season after a successful stint at Idaho, New Mexico head coach Jason Eck is 10-3 against the spread, including 6-1 ATS as an underdog.
Play New Mexico
| New Mexico | 54 / 7 | +47 | 30 | 49 | -27 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Oklahoma | 30.5 / 8.5 | +22 | 8 | 30 | -23 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| New Mexico | 09-12 | Mercyhurst | -42.5 | 54.5 | 70-7 | Oklahoma | 09-12 | @ Michigan | -5 | 43.5 | 10-17 |
| | 09-05 | Central M. | -11 | 47.5 | 38-7 | | 09-04 | UTEP | -41 | 51.5 | 51-0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| New Mexico |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Central Michigan | -11 | W | 38-7 | UN | 47.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Mercyhurst | -42.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 54.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oklahoma |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | UTEP | -41 | W | 51-0 | UN | 51.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 12.5 | -24 | W | 27-0 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Michigan | -5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 43.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 0-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9-Rated Priority Pick | | Updated: 09/16 12:12 am |
| BYU | 35 | -17.5 | 12 | -21 | 12 | 18 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +33.5 / - | -28.5 / - |
| Colorado State | 26 | 55 | 36(3) | | 38 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | +28 / - | -11.5 / - |
There are still several Big XII banana peels on the slate and a holy war vs. Notre Dame in Provo on tap for mid-October, but after disposing of dangerous Arizona last week, one can more clearly see the path for BYU to get back to the conference title game (especially with no Texas Tech or Houston on the regular season slate). A chance to make the College Football Playoffs slipped through the Cougs’ fingers last December when losing the conference finale to the Red Raiders in Arlington. The bigger question this week is if this is a potential flat spot vs. Jim Mora’s Colorado State, which looks the easiest test on the rest of the schedule. Yet, could the first road trip of the season, plus an upcoming bye week before the schedule begins to ramp up in October, prevent BYU from low-keying it just a bit in Fort Collins? To that, Big XII insiders aren’t sure, especially as there are indicators Mora might be authoring a quick about-face with the Rams, who bottomed out last fall as the Jay Norvell regime unraveled before the end of the season. Keep in mind that Mora recently helped turn around another desperate situation at UConn, taking the Huskies to a bowl in his debut 2022 campaign after UConn had won four games the previous four years combined. Working shrewdly in the portal as he did with the Huskies, Mora has apparently added some gamers, including former Oklahoma State QB Hauss Hejny, who battled injuries and a stifling environment in Stillwater but looks rejuvenated for the Rams after tossing nine TD passes across the first two weeks while also showing off his legs on a 75-yard TD run last week vs. Southern Utah. Meanwhile, RB Mel Harris has tagged along with Mora from UConn and is gaining a whopping 13.4 yards per carry with the Rams, including his own 73-yard TD run last week vs. SUU. We would expect Bear Bachmeier and the Cougar offense to eventually fire the majority of scoring shots, but with bigger challenges still on the horizon, not sure BYU can summon the sort of needed 60-minute intensity to prevent an apparently improved Colorado State from slipping inside of this generous impost.
Play Colorado State
| BYU | 45.5 / 12 | +33.5 | 12 | 36 | -28.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Colorado State | 46.5 / 18.5 | +28 | 39 | 47 | -11.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| BYU | 09-12 | Arizona U | -6.5 | 48.5 | 28-17 | Colorado State | 09-12 | Southern . | -20.5 | 57.5 | 58-24 |
| | 09-05 | Dixie Sta. | -50.5 | 61.5 | 63-7 | | 09-05 | Wyoming | -2.5 | 46 | 35-13 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| BYU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Dixie State | -50.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona U | -6.5 | W | 28-17 | UN | 48.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Colorado State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Wyoming | -2.5 | W | 35-13 | OV | 46 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9 | -0.5 | W | 14-6 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern Utah | -20.5 | W | 58-24 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 17-7 | OV | | | W | 48-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| LSU | 35 | -3 | 9 | | 8 | 38 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | +36 / - | -22.5 / - |
| Mississippi | 31 | 59 | 8(3) | -4 | 8 | 52 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | +32 / - | -44 / - |
Does there come a point where the build-up becomes a little too much to handle? Penn State's White Out is widely considered a top-1/2/3 environment in college football every year. Well the Nittany Lions are only 13-9 straight-up in those games since its inception, often crumbling under the weight of mistakes and sloppy play even though 106,000 people are on their side. Now take that White Out environment and multiply it by 662 (Oxford's area code) and that's what you're going to see and feel ahead of this one as Lane Kiffin returns to The Grove. LSU knows exactly what it's in for on Saturday as the Rebels have promised to make this as uncomfortable as possible for their former coach. Does there come a point where the Ole Miss crowd is making so much noise on defense that it actually affects the Rebels? Does there come a point where the Ole Miss players are trying TOO hard against their former tutor? From a power ratings' perspective, we have a very tough time justifying this price in favor of the Tigers. From a situation perspective, there's simply no one better equipped to play the returning villain than Kiffin. He is going to have veteran QB Sam Leavitt prepared for every possible situation. We can say with relative confidence that LSU started preparing for this game last week instead of preparing for a Louisiana Tech team that looked like it might shock the world for a couple minutes. Rebels' QB Trinidad Chambliss will likely need to turn this game into a high-scoring shootout to keep up with the Bayou Bengals.
Play the Over
09/17 12:35 PM PDT — LSU QB Sam Leavitt is listed as doubtful on the Tigers' injury report with a shoulder injury. Leavitt did not appear to be in any discomfort at the end of the game against Louisiana Tech, so details of this injury are sparse.
| LSU | 48 / 12 | +36 | 8 | 27 | -22.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Mississippi | 41 / 23.5 | +17.5 | 9 | 33 | -25.5 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 |
| LSU | 09-12 | Louisiana. | -34.5 | 55 | 45-14 | Mississippi | 09-12 | Charlotte | -44 | 59.5 | 41-9 |
| | 09-05 | Clemson | -10 | 49 | 51-10 | | 09-06 | Louisville | -6.5 | 54.5 | 41-38 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 09-27-25 | LSU | 19 | 58 | 16 | 21/59 | 21/34/1/197 | 0/0 |
| Mississippi | 24 | -2.5 | 28 | 42/170 | 23/39/1/314 | 1/1 |
| 10-12-24 | Mississippi | 26 | -4 | 22 | 41/181 | 24/42/1/284 | 2/1 |
| LSU | 29 | 64.5 | 22 | 24/84 | 22/51/2/337 | 0/0 |
| LSU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Clemson | -10 | W | 51-10 | OV | 49 | -3 | W | 17-3 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 31-3 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Louisiana Tech | -34.5 | L | 45-14 | OV | 55 | -9.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | McNeese State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:0-1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Louisville | -6.5 | L | 41-38 | OV | 54.5 | -3 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | -4 | PK | 10-6 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Charlotte | -44 | L | 41-9 | UN | 59.5 | -13.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14.5 | -27.5 | L | 27-0 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wofford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan State | 9 | 51.5 | 21.5 | | 23 | 45 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-0-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +19 / - | -14 / - |
| Notre Dame | 34 | -29 | 3(3) | -21.5 | 3 | 44 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 | +52 / - | -44.5 / - |
This is the first meeting between the Irish and Spartans since 2017. Notre Dame has won four of the last five, with Michigan State's lone win coming in 2016 as a 7.5-point 'dog. A marriage between Notre Dame and the Big Ten has fallen on deaf ears over the last three decades, but the Irish will feel like an honorary member of the league in September. Notre Dame will play Wisconsin (won 41-13), Michigan State and Purdue before the end of the month. The Irish are coming off a shut-out win over Rice where the defense held the Owls to 128 total yards and seven first downs while forcing four turnovers. CJ Carr continued to show his maturation after going 16-of-20 for 253 yards with four touchdowns and no interceptions. Pat Fitzgerald has had his team ready to play thus far as the Spartans have beaten Toledo and Eastern Michigan by a combined margin of 65-27. The Irish are in a different place right now than they were a year ago. Notre Dame opened the year with back-to-back losses to Miami (Fla) and Texas A&M, which put the Irish in a more-aggressive mindframe for the rest of the season. Needing style points to stay in the College Football Playoff discussion, the Irish beat Purdue by 26, Arkansas by 43, NC State by 29, Boise State by 21, Navy by 39, Syracuse by 63 and Stanford by 29. Notre Dame doesn't need that at this point of the season. Frankly, they won 52-0 against Rice last week by accident after the Owls couldn't hang onto the ball. There’s no need for Marcus Freeman to have his foot on the gas (yet).
Play Michigan State
| Michigan State | 32.5 / 13.5 | +19 | 24 | 41 | -14 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-0-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Notre Dame | 46.5 / 6.5 | +40 | 3 | 32 | -33 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 0-1 / 0-0 |
| Michigan State | 09-12 | Eastern M. | -17.5 | 49.5 | 35-7 | Notre Dame | 09-12 | Rice | -44.5 | 54.5 | 52-0 |
| | 09-04 | Toledo | -10 | 48.5 | 30-20 | | 09-06 | Wisconsin | -21.5 | 46 | 41-13 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Michigan State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-1-1 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Toledo | -10 | PK | 30-20 | OV | 48.5 | -3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -6.5 | W | 19-7 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Eastern Michigan | -17.5 | W | 35-7 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 26 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Notre Dame |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Wisconsin | -21.5 | W | 41-13 | OV | 46 | -6.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Rice | -44.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 54.5 | -13.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -26.5 | W | 42-0 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kennesaw State | 10 | 60 | 43 | | 42 | 50 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 | +16.5 / - | -14.5 / - |
| Tennessee U | 45 | -35 | 12(3) | -34 | 12 | 22 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +47 / +21 | -49.5 / -12.5 |
We were on the under in Tennessee's game against Georgia Tech last week and probably deserved a better fate. That game featured a blocked punt returned for a touchdown and an interception return for a touchdown, yet was still under the total until the two-minute warning when the Yellow Jackets scored a not-so-meaningless touchdown. Vols freshman QB Faizon Brandon continues to learn the ropes, and this will be a nice test for him before Tennessee opens SEC play against Texas next week. At Kennesaw, the early returns on highly-touted QB Rickie Collins have largely been disappointing. Collins, who began his career at LSU, struggled to move the ball as the Owls lost as a 7.5-point home favorite to Georgia State. Jim Knowles' defense should have no problem shutting down the Kennesaw offense. As we mentioned, there were 3-4 "unconventional" touchdowns that gave Tennessee's final score against Georgia Tech quite the boost. As long as this game stays in a somewhat-normal game state, we're comfortable going back to the well on the under one more time.
Play the Under
| Kennesaw State | 32 / 15.5 | +16.5 | 41 | 53 | -14.5 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 0-2 / 0-0 |
| Tennessee U | 50.5 / 16.5 | +34 | 12 | 38 | -31 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Kennesaw State | 09-12 | Georgia S. | -7.5 | 55.5 | 17-31 | Tennessee U | 09-12 | @ Georgia T. | -12.5 | 55.5 | 45-24 |
| | 09-03 | WEST GEOR. | -21.5 | 50.5 | 47-0 | | 09-05 | Furman | -49.5 | 66.5 | 56-9 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Kennesaw State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -21.5 | W | 47-0 | UN | 50.5 | 0 | W | 19-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 40-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia State | -7.5 | L | 17-31 | UN | 55.5 | -2.5 | L | 3-6 | UN | 12.5 | -4.5 | L | 3-21 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-07-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-14-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tennessee U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Furman | -49.5 | L | 56-9 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Georgia Tech | -12.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 55.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13 | -6.5 | W | 24-10 | OV | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas St | 20 | 56.5 | 38.5 | | 39 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | +45 / -18 | -31.5 / +10.5 |
| TCU | 42 | -19 | 18.5(2) | -22 | 18 | 55 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | +56 / - | -44.5 / - |
Both teams are coming off wins over FCS-level opponents, so not much to learn from last week. Folks around Fort Worth should keep an eye on the Clemson-North Carolina result, because if the Tar Heels take care of business on the road against the Tigers, the Horned Frogs' Week 0 loss might not look so bad. We're expecting to see some points in this one. Arkansas State opened the year by allowing 42 points to Memphis, and we wouldn't be shocked if the Horned Frogs flirted with a similar output. Dating back to the end of last season, Arkansas State's last five games have all gone over the total. Former Texas QB Trey Owens figures to get more comfortable in the RedWolves' offense as he gets more experience. TCU plays at UCF next week where Scott Frost loves to play with some tempo. You might as well get some reps in this week to prepare for the Knights.
Play the Over
| Arkansas St | 38 / 24.5 | +13.5 | 39 | 41 | -10.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| TCU | 36.5 / 11 | +25.5 | 18 | 40 | -26 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 | 1-0 / 0-0 |
| Arkansas St | 09-12 | WEST GEOR. | -31.5 | 56.5 | 52-7 | TCU | 09-12 | Grambling | -44.5 | 55.5 | 63-7 |
| | 09-05 | @ Memphis | +10.5 | 52.5 | 24-42 | | 08-29 | North Car. | -7.5 | 46.5 | 10-15 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Arkansas St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Memphis | 10.5 | L | 24-42 | OV | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-21 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -31.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 56.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| TCU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 08-29-26 | North Carolina | -7.5 | L | 10-15 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | L | 10-12 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Grambling | -44.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tex San Antonio | 13 | 58.5 | 28 | | 28 | 31 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +29 / +5 | -28 / +1.5 |
| Texas | 48 | -30 | 3.5(3) | -27.5 | 4 | 4 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +26.5 / - | -16 / - |
The Longhorns and RoadRunners cross paths on even-numbered years, apparently. Texas won-and-covered each of the last two meetings in 2022 and 2024. Most eyes will gravitate toward the Longhorns' schedule, but this is quite the sandwich spot for both teams. After beating Ohio State last week, Texas opens SEC play against Tennessee next week. That one is pretty straightforward, cut-and-dry. But UTSA already has a nice non-conference win over Texas State and the RoadRunners have another nice opportunity against up-and-coming Colorado State next week. Win that game and the RoadRunners get to start sniffing around the rankings discussion. So this "sandwich spot" isn't a one-way street. UTSA typically hasn't fared very well against Power Conference competition in the past. We mentioned the losses to Texas in '22 and '24, but in addition to those, the RoadRunners lost by 31 to Tennessee and 18 to Texas A&M (down 25 and scored with 0:14 remaining). Obviously the RoadRunners would love to put a scare into an in-state older brother, but if it's not in the cards, they have different goals down the line. If this becomes a battle of the back-ups in the second half, Texas is pulling five-star bluechips off the bench while UTSA is working with D-II transfers.
| Tex San Antonio | 38 / 21 | +17 | 28 | 43 | -13.5 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Texas | 41.5 / 15 | +26.5 | 4 | 17 | -16 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Tex San Antonio | 09-12 | @ Texas Sta. | +1.5 | 65.5 | 31-26 | Texas | 09-12 | Ohio State | -2 | 50.5 | 24-23 |
| | 09-05 | UT Rio Gr. | -28 | 59.5 | 45-16 | | 09-05 | Texas Sta. | -29.5 | 61.5 | 59-7 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tex San Antonio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UT Rio Grande Valley | -28 | W | 45-16 | OV | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas State | 1.5 | W | 31-26 | UN | 65.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 14 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-08-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-0-1 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Texas State | -29.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 61.5 | -7.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -17.5 | W | 28-7 | OV | 33 |
| 09-12-26 | Ohio State | -2 | L | 24-23 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UAB | 24 | 55.5 | 41.5 | | 42 | 49 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +6 / -19 | -9 / +25.5 |
| Louisiana | 27 | -7 | 36(2) | -7.5 | 37 | 10 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +31 / -19 | -20.5 / +30.5 |
This is the first meeting between the Ragin' Cajuns and Blazers since 2023 when Louisiana earned a 20-point road win in Birmingham. Louisiana returns home after a nice effort in Los Angeles where the Cajuns comfortably stayed within the spread as a four-touchdown 'dog. First-Team All-Name QB Lunch Winfield went 16-of-22 for 212 passing yards with one touchdown and no interceptions against the Trojans. He added 91 yards and two touchdowns on the ground as the Cajuns were going score-for-score with USC for a while. UAB is going for the Louisiana sweep after taking down UL-Monroe last week. The Blazers trailed by ten in the second half before putting together four unanswered scoring drives. UAB finished with 266 yards on the ground. Our power ratings are directly in line with where this game has opened, but given Louisiana's travel after playing the physical Trojans, we're inclined to take the points with UAB. The Blazers were an absolute mess under Trent Dilfer last season, but even with that craziness, they still pulled off outright upsets against Memphis and Tulsa last year, while also comfortably staying within the spread at Navy and Tennessee.
Play UAB
| UAB | 24.5 / 31 | -6.5 | 42 | 33 | +8.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Louisiana | 34 / 28 | +6 | 38 | 33 | +5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| UAB | 09-12 | UL Monroe | -9 | 53.5 | 26-20 | Louisiana | 09-12 | @ USC | +30.5 | 59 | 30-49 |
| | 09-03 | @ Illinois | +25.5 | 54 | 23-42 | | 09-05 | Lamar | -20.5 | 48.5 | 38-7 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| UAB |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-0-1 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Illinois | 25.5 | W | 23-42 | OV | 54 | 7 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | W | 13-21 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | UL Monroe | -9 | L | 26-20 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13 | -6 | L | 10-17 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-25-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Samford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-15-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lamar | -20.5 | W | 38-7 | UN | 48.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ USC | 30.5 | W | 30-49 | OV | 59 | 7.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 18.5 | W | 10-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| James Madison | 22 | 46.5 | 26 | -3 | 27 | 55 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | +45.5 / - | -26.5 / - |
| San Diego State | 19 | -3 | 30(1) | | 28 | 19 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +33 / -18 | -38.5 / +13.5 |
We can only assume that at one time, Billy Napier must have gotten stuck in one of those traffic jams across the Verrazzano Narrows Bridge to make him late for an appointment, or perhaps once got a bit sea-sick on the Ferry ride from Manhattan. Whatever, it must have been something about Staten Island - Wagner’s home base - to make Napier want to roll up 87 points on the poor FCS Seahawks last week. Or, perhaps, it was a message to all of those Florida fans who made his recent stay in Gainesville so uncomfortable. Maybe Napier is just more comfy at the Group of 6 level after succeeding for years in Lafayette with the Ragin’ Cajuns and now off to a fast 2-0 start at James Madison. So far, so good with his reconstructed staff and a roster full of portal adds in Harrisonburg, including Richmond transfer QB Camden Coleman. Even as it was against an FCS-level foe last week, the Dukes’ pair of punt return TDs suggests the special teams are in a very good place as well. It’s on defense, however, where JMU figures to have a chance in competitive battles like this one at Snapdragon and the opener vs. Liberty, when the Flames were mostly flustered in a 20-13 loss. Meanwhile, the Aztecs might be a tougher sell than their nine wins a year ago suggests they should be, as still no evidence of an upgrade in the passing offense with former Michigan transfer QB Jayden Denegal, who only completed six passes last week in the loss at UCLA. Sean Lewis’ aerial threat remains on the tarmac, ranking alongside the likes of option teams like Air Force and Navy near the bottom of national passing stats (133 out of 138), and still forced to lean on the defense and ground game led by RB Lucky Sutton (1,297 yards rushing last year). That was enough vs many limited Mountain West entries last year and perhaps will be again vs. the many middling foes in the “new Pac-12" slate upcoming, but will it be good enough vs. a top-level Group of 6 opponent, of which the Dukes (we think), even with Napier, still qualify?
Play James Madison
| James Madison | 53.5 / 8 | +45.5 | 28 | 45 | -26.5 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| San Diego State | 31.5 / 24 | +7.5 | 27 | 37 | -12.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| James Madison | 09-12 | Wagner | -46.5 | 56.5 | 87-3 | San Diego State | 09-12 | @ UCLA | +13.5 | 53.5 | 10-28 |
| | 09-05 | Liberty | -6 | 51 | 20-13 | | 09-05 | Portland . | -38.5 | 61 | 53-20 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| James Madison |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Liberty | -6 | W | 20-13 | UN | 51 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wagner | -46.5 | W | 87-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 42-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-22-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-29-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-05-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Diego State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:0-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Portland St | -38.5 | L | 53-20 | OV | 61 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | W | 29-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ UCLA | 13.5 | L | 10-28 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| No Illinois | 6 | 50 | 49 | | 47 | 55 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | -4 / -40 | +2.5 / +31 |
| Arizona U | 45 | -34.5 | 17.5(2) | -33.5 | 18 | 12 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | +28 / -11 | -33.5 / +6.5 |
We’re not sure anyone is too happy about Northern Illinois and its decision to move its football operation to the Mountain West this season. Likely not the MAC, from where the Huskies departed and whose members look like they are going to miss out on a chance to beat up maybe the worst NIU team in a generation. Probably not the Mountain West or commissioner Gloria Nevarez, either, thinking they were getting a representative gridiron entry to replace the many departed schools to the new Pac-12. Come to think of it, Nevarez is probably less-than-thrilled about the other conference newbie, UTEP, and its early-season showing, too. So, what has happened to the Huskies, just two years removed from that raucous upset win at Notre Dame? Well, in February, head coach Thomas Hammock escaped DeKalb to take a job on the staff of the Super Bowl champion Seahawks, which sounds like a great career move to us. Given the timing, however, NIU had little alternative other than promoting from within, as defensive coordinator Rob Harley was elevated on an interim basis through the rest of the season. Yet the Huskies had already begun a decline under Hammock, dipping to 3-9 last season with one of the nation’s worst offenses. Portal defections had already depleted the roster before Hammock left town, making this look a thankless task for Harley. After the passing game flatlined and recorded just eight TD passes last season, Harley is hoping that Western Carolina transfer Taron Dickens (who tossed 38 TDs for the Catamounts a year ago) can jump-start the attack, but after two games, all the Huskies have to show for Dickens is one TD pass, a lopsided shutout loss at Iowa and a 28-24 home setback to FCS Illinois State, which actually entered last weekend as a slight favorite. Needless to say, none of this bodes well if host Arizona is of the mind to take out some frustrations after a bitter loss at BYU last week in which the Wildcats had more than a bone or two to pick with the officiating in Provo. If Arizona is angry enough, QB Noah Fifita (77 career TD passes) has enough weapons at his disposal to extend the margin over the horizon. We’re also hardly sure NIU has enough offense to slip in the back door if the ‘Cats leave it open late in Tucson. Dating back to early in the 2024 campaign, Northern Illinois is 5-15 against the spread over its last 20 games.
Play Arizona
| No Illinois | 12 / 34 | -22 | 47 | 36 | +17 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Arizona U | 26 / 17.5 | +8.5 | 18 | 34 | -13.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| No Illinois | 09-12 | Illinois . | +2.5 | 48 | 24-28 | Arizona U | 09-12 | @ BYU | +6.5 | 48.5 | 17-28 |
| | 09-05 | @ Iowa | +31 | 44.5 | 0-40 | | 09-05 | Northern . | -33.5 | 59.5 | 35-7 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| No Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:0-2 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Iowa | 31 | L | 0-40 | UN | 44.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-20 | OV | 10 | 18.5 | L | 0-33 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Illinois State | 2.5 | L | 24-28 | OV | 48 | | L | 0-14 | OV | | | L | 17-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northern Arizona | -33.5 | L | 35-7 | UN | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ BYU | 6.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 48.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-06-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Dakota State | 42 | -24.5 | 27 | -25 | 28 | 32 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | +32 / +6 | -24 / -2 |
| Sacramento State | 10 | 50.5 | 53(1) | | 51 | 30 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | +52 / -28.5 | -38.5 / +13 |
We suppose it’s too late for Sacramento State to make another call to Jerry Rice’s alma mater Mississippi Valley State to get the Delta Devils (who lost to California's MAC rep 52-0 two weeks ago), back on the schedule ASAP. Though several modest MAC foes (like Eastern Michigan in the opener) might offer more suitable opposition, stepping up against the a higher class of FBS foes looks a problem for the Hornets after Fresno State reminded who is boss of the Central Valley in last weekend’s 49-3 romp for the Bulldogs at the Dog House. Perhaps head coach Alonzo Carter will get first-string QB Carson Conklin - who hasn’t featured since the opener due to a wrist problem - back to active duty this week, but that was hardly the only problem last Saturday for Sacramento State. The Hornets’ defense was also found wanting when allowing almost 550 yards in Fresno. It might not get any easier this week as North Dakota State has looked far more prepared to make the FBS jump and already with impressive wins over Jacksonville State and Air Force, the latter a bit more comfy than the final 38-32 scoreline suggests as the Falcons made a belated rush to close the gap in the final minutes. Following in the footsteps of Fargo predecessors like Carson Wentz and Trey Lance, QB Nathan Hayes is completing better than 70-percent of his passes for a Bison offense scoring at a robust 36 points per game clip, while the stop unit doesn’t have to worry about an awkward assignment like Troy Calhoun’s option. That unit has already proven it can deal with more conventional attacks when limiting first two foes (J’ville State and Fordham) to a mere combined seven points. Mountain West insiders also suggest that having a first showcase as an FBS rep on big ESPN should also make it a bit easier on head coach Brent Vigen to have his NDSU charges fully-focused, too.
Play North Dakota State
| North Dakota State | 36.3 / 13 | +23.3 | 29 | 41 | -16.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Sacramento State | 24 / 25.7 | -1.7 | 50 | 43 | -4 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| North Dakota State | 09-12 | @ Air Force | -2 | 48.5 | 38-32 | Sacramento State | 09-12 | @ Fresno St. | +17.5 | 43.5 | 3-49 |
| | 09-05 | Fordham | -41.5 | 54 | 38-0 | | 09-05 | Miss Vall. | -38.5 | 55.5 | 52-0 |
| | 08-29 | Jacksonvi. | -6.5 | 46.5 | 33-7 | | 08-29 | @ Eastern M. | +8.5 | 53 | 17-28 |
| North Dakota State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Jacksonville St | -6.5 | W | 33-7 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -3.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Fordham | -41.5 | L | 38-0 | UN | 54 | | W | 3-0 | OV | | | W | 17-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Air Force | -2 | W | 38-32 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 28-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sacramento State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-2 , PSR:1-2 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-2 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 8.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 53 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Miss Valley State | -38.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Fresno State | 17.5 | L | 3-49 | OV | 43.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-32 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-30-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-04-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Fresno State | 30 | -4 | 28.5 | -13.5 | 29 | 50 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | +46 / -39 | -17.5 / +22.5 |
| San Jose State | 27 | 47.5 | 43(1) | | 44 | 55 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | +10 / -5 | -21.5 / +19 |
Fresno State has covered the spread in five of the last six "Valley Trophy" battles vs. old rival (since 1921) San Jose State. Note the historical closeness in this series, with the Bulldogs leading 46-39-3 and an aggregate score of 1994-1908 favoring Fresno. That means we've seen an average score of 22.7-21.7 across the previous 88 meetings! Thank goodness one of the scheduling casualties (at least for the time being) of the defection of Fresno State and four others from the Mountain West to the new Pac-12 isn’t this long-standing rivalry. This series has withstood several regional affiliations, namely the old CCAA, PCAA, Big West, WAC and Mountain West among them). It’s also a revenge battle for the Spartans after getting clocked last November by Fresno 41-14, though keep in mind that San Jose was in a steep decline due to injuries and other factors late last season. Now, head coach Ken Niumatalolo looks like he might be fostering at least a mild turnaround in Silicon Valley as the Spartans have won two straight after an honorable loss (and spread cover) at ranked USC in the opener. Coach Ken’s main worry this season - finding a capable QB - seems to have been solved by Hawaii transfer Luke Weaver, who has already tossed eight TD passes in three games while also displaying ample mobility in the pocket. Holdover running back Jabari Bates (already 319 yards rushing) is suddenly providing an upgraded infantry diversion in offensive coordinator Craig Stutzmann’s new and more-balanced version of the Run-and-Shoot. We’re a bit more reluctant to say that Matt Entz at Fresno has solved his QB issues with junior Jayden Mandal, who had the look of a deer-in-the-headlights in the opener at USC before things started to click in a big way last week vs. outmanned Sacramento State when connecting on 23 of 26 pass attempts. Yet, dominating the FBS newbie Hornets - who were playing with a backup QB - doesn't necessarily constitute any conclusive buy signal, at least not yet, we'd say. At the risk of sounding snarky, let’s see Mandal and Fresno do that again vs. an entry somewhere in the middle of the Bulldogs’ first two foes. With the Spartans scoring nearly 30 points per game, they likely have enough offense with rapid-fire QB Weaver to make this spread work for the hosts in the Bay Area as night owls stay glued to the action on Fox Sports 1.
Play San Jose State
| Fresno State | 24.5 / 21 | +3.5 | 29 | 31 | +2.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| San Jose State | 27.7 / 27.7 | 0 | 44 | 36 | +5.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Fresno State | 09-12 | Sacrament. | -17.5 | 43.5 | 49-3 | San Jose State | 09-12 | Cal Poly | -21.5 | 58.5 | 30-20 |
| | 09-04 | @ USC | +22.5 | 51.5 | 0-39 | | 09-04 | @ Eastern M. | +1 | 55 | 27-21 |
| | | | | | | | 08-29 | @ USC | +37 | 61 | 26-42 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Fresno State | 41 | -3 | 16 | 53/259 | 15/20/1/138 | 2/2 |
| San Jose State | 14 | 44.5 | 14 | 26/113 | 11/34/5/114 | 0/0 |
| 10-26-24 | San Jose State | 10 | 55 | 20 | 18/101 | 21/51/4/284 | 1/0 |
| Fresno State | 33 | -6.5 | 22 | 39/127 | 30/41/1/275 | 0/0 |
| Fresno State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-1 , PSR:0-1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ USC | 22.5 | L | 0-39 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | PK | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-30 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Sacramento State | -17.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -10.5 | W | 32-0 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Jose State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-1 , PSR:2-1 , O/U:1-2-0 | 1Q SUR:0-1 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:0-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:0-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ USC | 37 | W | 26-42 | OV | 61 | 10 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14 | 23.5 | L | 0-28 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 1 | W | 27-21 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 0 | W | 10-7 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Cal Poly | -21.5 | L | 30-20 | UN | 58.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 13-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-09-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Purdue | 16 | 53 | 31 | | 31 | 24 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 | +11.5 / - | -16.5 / - |
| UCLA | 35 | -13.5 | 19(2) | -14 | 20 | 27 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | +18 / +21 | -13.5 / -2.5 |
Wishful thinking, perhaps, that the Big Ten might want Rick Mount and Kareem Adbul-Jabbar as honorary captains for this late-nighter at the Rose Bowl. Indeed, Purdue vs. UCLA conjures up more memories on the hardwood, including some memorable battles in the late 60s featuring Mount and then-called Lew Alcindor, among them the dramatic opening night of Mackey (then called Purdue) Arena as John Wooden returned home, plus the 1969 title game in Louisville. The Boilermakers don’t have any better gridiron memories from the last time they were a series visitor, either, when Jim Young’s fifth-ranked Riveters suffered a 31-21 upset in September ‘79 at the LA Coliseum as the night air was filled with wafting smoke from nearby wildfires. To the present, and Barry Odom has a chore on his hands to lift Purdue’s spirits after thinking they had beaten Wake Forest in OT last week before video review gave the Deacs another chance and they capitalized. Odom does seem to have the Boilermakers back on the way up after inheriting a carcass of a program from Ryan Walters last fall, and gunslinger QB Ryan Browne is doing his best Mark Herrmann/Jim Everett impression by passing for over 300 yards in both of Purdue’s games to date. Minnesota transfer RB Fame Ijeboi (already 201 yards rushing) is providing needed balance. Defense, however, continues to be a concern after ranking well into the triple digits nationally in all relevant categories last season, and we need to see a bit more before we think about bucking a resurgent UCLA. The Bruins have a buy signal as bright as the nearby Hollywood sign after back-to-back wins, welcoming in a new dawn at the Rose Bowl under first-year head coach Bob Chesney. Already his various James Madison transfers are making an impact, like big-play running back Wayne Knight who is on pace for 36 TDs after recording three in each of the first two wins. The Bruins took charge in the fourth quarter on both occasions while out-scoring Cal and San Diego State by a combined 42-10 margin. Chesney does have some concerns about QB Nico Imaeleava, yet to join the TD parade and guilty of il–advised red-zone picks in each of the first two games. Nico is still making plays with his legs, however, while the “Bruin Bullies” defense - full of ballhawks - has seamlessly integrated other portal adds (some from Chesney’s JMU) and helped fuel fourth quarter avalanches in each of the first two wins. We'd rather not get in the way of the UCLA freight train until further notice.
Play UCLA
| Purdue | 40 / 28.5 | +11.5 | 31 | 39 | -16.5 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 1-1 / 0-0 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| UCLA | 36.5 / 17 | +19.5 | 20 | 25 | -8 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Purdue | 09-12 | Wake Fore. | +2.5 | 51.5 | 36-38 | UCLA | 09-12 | San Diego. | -13.5 | 53.5 | 28-10 |
| | 09-04 | Indiana S. | -35 | 56 | 44-19 | | 09-05 | @ California | -2.5 | 53.5 | 45-24 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purdue |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-1 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:2-0-0 | 1Q SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-0 , O/U:1-0-0 | 1H SUR:1-1 , PSR:0-1 , O/U:1-0-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Indiana State | -35 | L | 44-19 | OV | 56 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 16-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Wake Forest | 2.5 | W | 36-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 1 | L | 10-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-03-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-16-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UCLA |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-0 , PSR:2-0 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1Q SUR:0-0 , PSR:0-2 , O/U:1-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-0 , PSR:1-1 , O/U:1-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ California | -2.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 24-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | San Diego State | -13.5 | W | 28-10 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 09-26-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-17-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-24-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10-31-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-07-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| KEY |
| Score | The predicted score for an event |
| PR | The team's Power Rating |
| GS Line | The GoldSheet line, calculated using each team's Power Rating. |
| Avg. PR | The average Power Rating of a team over the course of the season. |
| Avg. OPR | The average of a team's opponent Power Rating on the day that they played. |
| SUR (H/A) | The team's straight-up-record, both at home and on the road. |
| ATS (H/A) | The team's record against-the-spread. |
| O/U (H/A) | The team's over-under record. |
| Pts. Diff. (H/A) | The team's +/- point differential. |
| Avg. Ln. (H/A) | The average line the team has had over the course of the season. |
| PF/PA | The average points a team has scored and allowed. |
| FD | The total number of first downs. |
| RA/RY | The number of rushing attempts and yards. |
| PC/PA/I/PY | The number of passing completions, attempts, interceptions and yards. |
| RA/RY | The number of fumbles and fumbles lost. |
COPYRIGHT 2026 © THE GOLD SHEET
ALL RIGHT RESERVED.