November 3rd
| Buffalo U | 20 | 45 | 45 | | 47 | 46 | 4-1 / 1-2 | 3-2 / 1-2 | 2-3 / 2-1 | +3.6 / -13.3 | -8.5 / +22 |
| Miami Ohio | 23 | -6.5 | 41(1) | -5 | 36 | 46 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 2-1 / 3-1 | +14.3 / -11.8 | -13 / +5.5 |
Miami has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings, including a 37-20 road win in Buffalo last season. The Bulls actually out-gained the RedHawks in that contest and held a 21-16 advantage in first downs, but couldn't overcome a -3 turnover differential. Both teams are on equal rest heading into the start of mid-week MACtion. Miami has won each of its last three games, but the RedHawks have caught some teams in fortunate situations. UMass was missing starting QB Pop Watson and Central Michigan was playing its first game without starting QB Angel Flores. Those wins aren't moving the needle for us, especially considering Miami didn't cover the spread in either contest. Buffalo has covered the number in four-straight games as the Bulls are playing some of their best football of the season. Buffalo was also fortunate to catch the Minutemen without Watson, but the Bulls covered the spread in those other three contests by an average of 16.2 points per game. Pete Lembo is a veteran coach that generally knows what buttons to push as the season progresses. This doesn't look like the same Buffalo squad that opened the year 0-4 against the spread. Knowing that they coulda-shoulda-woulda given the RedHawks a closer game last year should help fuel the Bulls to another strong performance on Tuesday night.
Play Buffalo
| Buffalo U | 26.3 / 16.7 | +9.7 | 49 | 43 | +3 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Miami Ohio | 27.3 / 20 | +7.3 | 41 | 47 | -6.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-0 / 1-1 |
| Buffalo U | 10-24 | Bowling G. | -3 | 44.5 | 31-24 | Miami Ohio | 10-24 | @ Central M. | -3.5 | 41 | 28-27 |
| | 10-17 | Massachus. | -6 | 43.5 | 25-18 | | 10-17 | Akron | -9.5 | 48 | 34-14 |
| | 10-10 | @ Toledo | +18.5 | 55 | 23-8 | | 10-10 | @ Massachus. | -6 | 44.5 | 20-19 |
|
| 11-19-25 | Miami Ohio | 37 | -2.5 | 16 | 36/168 | 13/25/0/185 | 0/0 |
| Buffalo U | 20 | 39 | 21 | 33/46 | 24/48/2/303 | 2/1 |
| Buffalo U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:6-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Albany | -18.5 | L | 21-17 | UN | 47.5 | 0 | L | 0-7 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 14-10 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Florida Intl | 8 | L | 20-33 | OV | 47.5 | 3 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10 | 5.5 | L | 6-21 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Penn State | 40 | L | 13-55 | OV | 48.5 | 10.5 | L | 3-17 | OV | 13.5 | 24 | L | 6-34 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | Robert Morris | -28 | L | 31-28 | OV | 46.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | 14-14 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Western Michigan | 13 | W | 17-20 | UN | 46 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 7.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Toledo | 18.5 | W | 23-8 | UN | 55 | 6.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 13.5 | 10.5 | W | 13-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Massachusetts | -6 | W | 25-18 | UN | 43.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 7.5 | -4 | L | 8-15 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Bowling Green | -3 | W | 31-24 | OV | 44.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 7.5 | -1.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 21.5 |
| 11-03-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miami Ohio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:5-2-1 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-1-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 16.5 | L | 14-59 | OV | 48 | 3.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 10 | 9.5 | L | 14-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Holy Cross | -30.5 | W | 45-7 | OV | 47 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Cincinnati U | 14.5 | W | 31-35 | OV | 51 | 3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10 | 7.5 | W | 28-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Connecticut | -2.5 | W | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Bowling Green | -10 | L | 20-24 | OV | 41.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 6-10 | UN | 21 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Massachusetts | -6 | L | 20-19 | UN | 44.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | W | 14-10 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Akron | -9.5 | W | 34-14 | P | 48 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -6 | W | 17-7 | P | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Michigan | -3.5 | L | 28-27 | OV | 41 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 7.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 20 |
| 11-03-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ohio | 27 | -12.5 | 38 | -14 | 39 | 47 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 1-3 / 3-1 | +12.8 / +2.8 | -12 / +2.5 |
| Akron | 16 | 52.5 | 53(1) | | 52 | 50 | 1-2 / 0-5 | 2-1 / 1-4 | 1-2 / 3-1 | +1.7 / -23 | -3 / +14 |
Ohio has won each of the last seven meetings, but the Bobcats and Zips did not play last season. Four of the last five meetings have stayed under the total. Both teams are on equal rest heading into the start of mid-week MACtion. Ohio brings a five-game winning streak into this contest, and just like several years past under head coaches Frank Solich, Tim Albin and Brian Smith, the Bobcats are lurking under-the-radar for first-year head coach John Hauser. Ohio is off to a 4-0 start in conference play, beating the likes of Kent State, Central Michigan, Sacramento State and Eastern Michigan by an average of 16.3 points per game. After playing QB roulette earlier this season because of injuries, original-starter Nick Poulos has returned to the lineup and he had a strong performance against Eastern Michigan before the bye. Also, Ohio's non-conference win over Jacksonville State is aging quite nicely considering the Gamecocks have won all five of their games since that defeat. Akron is still searching for its first win over an FBS-level opponent and the Zips are just 1-5 against the spread over the last six contests. These teams share several common opponents (Eastern Michigan, Central Michigan and Kent State) - Ohio beat all three of those teams while Akron lost to all three of those teams. Early money has shown on Ohio, and while our power ratings agree with the move, we have some interest in Akron in the first half. Joe Moorhead has been dealt a tough hand, but he's still regarded as a strong offensive mind in college football. Akron has scored a first quarter touchdown in four of its last five games. Coming off a bye, Moorhead is going to have something up his sleeve in this contest. We mentioned that Akron is 1-5 against the spread over its last six games. Well, the Zips are 3-3 in the first half of those games. Akron generally doesn't have the talent to compete for 60 minutes, but Moorhead has given them a fighting chance in the first half. For a little bit of context, Ohio is laying a bigger spread in Akron (-14) than UNLV was (-13) a little over a month ago.
Play Akron 1H
| Ohio | 34.3 / 13.7 | +20.7 | 39 | 49 | -10.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Akron | 19 / 31.3 | -12.3 | 54 | 45 | +5.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-0 |
| Ohio | 10-24 | Eastern M. | -11 | 48.5 | 24-20 | Akron | 10-24 | @ Kent State | +3 | 48 | 20-35 |
| | 10-17 | @ Sacrament. | -18 | 45.5 | 48-7 | | 10-17 | @ Miami Ohio | +9.5 | 48 | 14-34 |
| | 10-10 | Central M. | -2.5 | 46.5 | 31-14 | | 10-10 | Eastern M. | +4.5 | 51.5 | 23-25 |
| Ohio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:6-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Nebraska | 23.5 | L | 21-49 | OV | 47.5 | 7 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10 | 13.5 | W | 13-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Jacksonville St | -1.5 | W | 29-27 | OV | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10 | -0.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ South Alabama | 7 | W | 36-41 | OV | 49.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Stonehill | -32 | L | 35-7 | UN | 53.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Kent State | -3.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Central Michigan | -2.5 | W | 31-14 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 31-0 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Sacramento State | -18 | W | 48-7 | OV | 45.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -9.5 | W | 27-0 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | Eastern Michigan | -11 | L | 24-20 | UN | 48.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-13 | UN | 24.5 |
| 11-03-26 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | @ Miami Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Akron |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-7 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:4-3-1 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-3-1 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Wake Forest | 28 | W | 16-38 | OV | 50.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 16.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Robert Morris | -26.5 | W | 45-10 | OV | 45.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Minnesota U | 22.5 | L | 7-41 | UN | 48.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | UNLV | 13 | L | 10-38 | UN | 53 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | W | 10-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Central Michigan | 6.5 | L | 17-41 | OV | 47.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Eastern Michigan | 4.5 | W | 23-25 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | W | 14-13 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Miami Ohio | 9.5 | L | 14-34 | P | 48 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 6 | L | 7-17 | P | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kent State | 3 | L | 20-35 | OV | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 11-03-26 | Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-10-26 | Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
November 4th
| Central Michigan | 20 | -2.5 | 44.5 | -3.5 | 45 | 41 | 3-2 / 0-3 | 4-1 / 0-3 | 2-3 / 1-2 | +6.6 / -32.3 | -2.5 / +18 |
| Eastern Michigan | 27 | 44.5 | 48(0) | | 46 | 38 | 2-2 / 2-3 | 2-2 / 2-3 | 0-4 / 2-3 | +2.8 / -10 | -6.5 / +10.5 |
The home team has won each of the last five meetings in this Wolverine State matchup, but that won't be a factor on Wednesday as this game is being played at Ford Field in Detroit. Central Michigan earned a 24-13 home win over the Eagles last season in a game that stayed well below the closing total. Both teams are on equal rest heading into the start of mid-week MACtion and both are looking to snap losing skids. Central Michigan has lost each of its last three games, while Eastern Michigan is coming off back-to-back losses against Toledo and Ohio. The Chippewas play a physical, run-based attack that is built for the sometimes-frigid temperatures of Mount Pleasant. While this trip to the Motor City provides a nice marketing opportunity for Central Michigan, playing in a controlled environment like this probably helps the Eagles. Eastern Michigan is generally looking to play with a little more explosiveness on offense, and the fast turf of Ford Field will likely help them a lot more than Central's rushing attack. Top receiver Nick Devereaux returned from injury against the Bobcats after missing each of the previous four games and he picked up where he left off with ten targets against Ohio. The Eagles' pass-heavy attack is likely going to benefit more from the offense-friendly conditions in the dome.
Play Eastern Michigan
| Central Michigan | 18.3 / 26.7 | -8.3 | 46 | 39 | +4.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Eastern Michigan | 19.7 / 27 | -7.3 | 46 | 43 | +4.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Central Michigan | 10-24 | Miami Ohio | +3.5 | 41 | 27-28 | Eastern Michigan | 10-24 | @ Ohio | +11 | 48.5 | 20-24 |
| | 10-17 | Western M. | +7.5 | 42.5 | 14-21 | | 10-17 | Toledo | +7 | 51.5 | 14-34 |
| | 10-10 | @ Ohio | +2.5 | 46.5 | 14-31 | | 10-10 | @ Akron | -4.5 | 51.5 | 25-23 |
|
| 09-27-25 | Eastern Michigan | 13 | 55 | 19 | 29/123 | 17/28/1/175 | 1/0 |
| Central Michigan | 24 | -3 | 22 | 48/311 | 15/18/0/140 | 0/0 |
| Central Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:2-6 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ New Mexico | 11 | L | 7-38 | UN | 47.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Colgate | -18.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 49.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 0-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Wyoming | 1.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 40 | 0 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 19.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Florida | 41 | L | 3-52 | OV | 52 | 10.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 24 | L | 3-35 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Akron | -6.5 | W | 41-17 | OV | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio | 2.5 | L | 14-31 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-31 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Western Michigan | 7.5 | W | 14-21 | UN | 42.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 4 | L | 0-14 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | Miami Ohio | 3.5 | W | 27-28 | OV | 41 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 7.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 20 |
| 11-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | @ Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Eastern Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-5 , PSR:4-5 , O/U:2-7-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:1-7-0 | 1H SUR:4-5 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Sacramento State | -8.5 | W | 28-17 | UN | 53 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-04-26 | San Jose State | -1 | L | 21-27 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 0 | L | 7-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Michigan State | 17.5 | L | 7-35 | UN | 49.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 26 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Wisconsin | 23.5 | L | 10-54 | OV | 44 | 6.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Lindenwood | -24 | W | 29-3 | UN | 53 | | W | 13-0 | OV | | | W | 19-0 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ Massachusetts | 5.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Akron | -4.5 | L | 25-23 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | L | 13-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Toledo | 7 | L | 14-34 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | L | 7-31 | OV | 27 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Ohio | 11 | W | 20-24 | UN | 48.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 11-04-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-24-26 | Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ball State | 27 | 49 | 48 | | 48 | 57 | 2-1 / 1-4 | 3-0 / 2-3 | 2-0 / 4-1 | +8.7 / -26.4 | -2.5 / +21.5 |
| Massachusetts | 31 | -2.5 | 45(1) | -4 | 45 | 39 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 1-3 / 1-3 | +6 / +4.8 | -13.5 / +10.5 |
This will be the first meeting between the Cardinals and Minutemen since October 2015. UMass had one extra day to prep for this one after falling at UConn last week, but the Minutemen still received some good news in the process. Dynamic QB Pop Watson III was originally feared to have suffered a season-ending foot injury a few weeks ago, but Watson made a somewhat-surprising return last week against the Huskies. He had some rust to shake, but Watson went 22-of-38 through the air with a touchdown and no interceptions. UMass couldn't get anything going on the ground (53 rushing yards) against UConn, but that shouldn't be too big of a problem this week against Ball State's defense. The Cardinals have covered the spread in four-straight games after beating Sacramento State two weeks ago. The over is 6-1-1 in Ball State's games, and that's the only direction we can look in this one. With Watson in the lineup at the beginning of the season, UMass scored 37 points at Rutgers and 35 points at Sacramento State. Ball State's defense is probably right between those two. Cardinals' QB Keldric Luster is a playmaker, but he's also prone to making plays for the other team (four interceptions in Ball State's last four games).
Play the Over
| Ball State | 26.7 / 31 | -4.3 | 48 | 40 | +8.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-0 / 2-0 |
| Massachusetts | 17.7 / 26.7 | -9 | 47 | 43 | +8 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Ball State | 10-24 | Sacrament. | -14.5 | 51 | 34-17 | Massachusetts | 10-23 | @ Connectic. | +12 | 53.5 | 16-35 |
| | 10-17 | @ Bowling G. | +6 | 46.5 | 32-31 | | 10-17 | @ Buffalo U | +6 | 43.5 | 18-25 |
| | 10-10 | @ Northwest. | +34.5 | 53.5 | 14-45 | | 10-10 | Miami Ohio | +6 | 44.5 | 19-20 |
| Ball State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:6-1-1 | 1Q SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Ohio State | 50 | L | 3-56 | OV | 55.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 28.5 | W | 3-28 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Stony Brook | -13.5 | W | 41-17 | OV | 52 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Liberty | 14.5 | L | 15-51 | OV | 49.5 | 4.5 | L | 7-13 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 7-23 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kent State | 2.5 | L | 13-26 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 1 | L | 0-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Toledo | 20.5 | W | 24-39 | OV | 53 | 6.5 | W | 7-6 | UN | 13.5 | 10.5 | W | 10-15 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Northwestern | 34.5 | W | 14-45 | OV | 53.5 | 9.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 14-31 | OV | 30 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Bowling Green | 6 | W | 32-31 | OV | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Sacramento State | -14.5 | W | 34-17 | P | 51 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 20-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 11-04-26 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Buffalo U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-17-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Massachusetts |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:3-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-3 , O/U:4-2-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Rutgers | 29.5 | W | 37-21 | OV | 55 | 7.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 17.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Sacred Heart | -23.5 | W | 37-10 | UN | 53.5 | | W | 17-0 | OV | | | W | 23-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Stonehill | -31 | L | 36-14 | UN | 51 | | W | 13-7 | OV | | | W | 13-7 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Sacramento State | -6 | W | 35-6 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 21-6 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Eastern Michigan | -5.5 | L | 14-38 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Miami Ohio | 6 | W | 19-20 | UN | 44.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | 3 | L | 10-14 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Buffalo U | 6 | L | 18-25 | UN | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 7.5 | 4 | W | 15-8 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Connecticut | 12 | L | 16-35 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | L | 3-21 | UN | 27 |
| 11-04-26 | Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-18-26 | Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Toledo | 42 | -25.5 | 37 | -17 | 36 | 35 | 4-1 / 2-1 | 3-2 / 1-1-1 | 4-1 / 2-1 | +14.2 / +8.3 | -13 / -6 |
| Sacramento State | 10 | 52.5 | 55(1) | | 54 | 49 | 2-3 / 0-4 | 3-2 / 0-4 | 1-4 / 2-1 | -3.6 / -25.5 | +3.5 / +12.5 |
Welcome to the MAC, Sacramento State! The Hornets got their first FBS-level win over Kent State last week, breaking a six-game losing streak (1-5 ATS during that run). The Hornets' reward is one of the shortest rest spots you'll see during the college football season. Sacramento State's game against Kent State ended late Friday night. Now, the Hornets have to host Toledo on Wednesday, in what is essentially a late-afternoon home game for the Hornets. Toledo is coming off a bye, so the Rockets will be well-rested for this contest. Toledo is coming off back-to-back point spread covers against Eastern and Western Michigan. Toledo played at Washington State in the middle of last season (Week 9, no bye before) so any players that are remaining from last year's team have some experience with a random West Coast road trip in the middle of the season. From a power ratings' perspective, this is a big number to lay and we've already seen one road favorite fail their first California trek. But given the rest advantage that Toledo has, the big number is justified. While Sacramento State deserves kudos for its first win, here's how the Hornets opened that game: Fumble, punt, punt, field goal, field goal, punt, field goal. Sacramento State didn't find the end zone until there were three minutes remaining in the third quarter.
Play Toledo
| Toledo | 29 / 25 | +4 | 36 | 44 | -9.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Sacramento State | 18.3 / 30.7 | -12.3 | 57 | 45 | +13 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-0 |
| Toledo | 10-24 | Western M. | -2.5 | 48.5 | 45-38 | Sacramento State | 10-30 | Kent State | +7 | 47.5 | 31-10 |
| | 10-17 | @ Eastern M. | -7 | 51.5 | 34-14 | | 10-24 | @ Ball State | +14.5 | 51 | 17-34 |
| | 10-10 | Buffalo U | -18.5 | 55 | 8-23 | | 10-17 | Ohio | +18 | 45.5 | 7-48 |
| Toledo |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-3-1 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-4-1 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Michigan State | 10 | PK | 20-30 | OV | 48.5 | 3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 6.5 | L | 7-19 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Central Conn. | -36.5 | W | 63-10 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 14-3 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Temple | -4.5 | L | 49-48 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | L | 14-24 | OV | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | San Diego State | -2.5 | W | 41-16 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Ball State | -20.5 | L | 39-24 | OV | 53 | -6.5 | L | 6-7 | UN | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 15-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Buffalo U | -18.5 | L | 8-23 | UN | 55 | -6.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 0-13 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | -7 | W | 34-14 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 31-7 | OV | 27 |
| 10-24-26 | Western Michigan | -2.5 | W | 45-38 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 31-14 | OV | 23.5 |
| 11-04-26 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sacramento State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-7 , PSR:3-6 , O/U:3-5-1 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:1-7-0 | 1H SUR:1-8 , PSR:0-7-1 , O/U:6-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 8.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 53 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Miss Valley State | -38.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Fresno State | 17.5 | L | 3-49 | OV | 43.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-32 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Dakota State | 24.5 | W | 10-31 | UN | 50.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 10.5 | 14.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Massachusetts | 6 | L | 6-35 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 6-21 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Bowling Green | 9 | L | 10-38 | OV | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6 | L | 3-17 | UN | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Ohio | 18 | L | 7-48 | OV | 45.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 9.5 | L | 0-27 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Ball State | 14.5 | L | 17-34 | P | 51 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 10-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-30-26 | Kent State | 7 | W | 31-10 | UN | 47.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 4 | PK | 6-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 11-04-26 | Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-11-26 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
November 5th
| Tex San Antonio | 41 | -7 | 29.5 | -6.5 | 29 | 33 | 4-0 / 3-1 | 2-1-1 / 3-1 | 4-0 / 1-3 | +13.5 / +1.5 | -13.5 / +4.5 |
| Florida Atlantic | 38 | 71.5 | 37(1) | | 37 | 32 | 4-0 / 1-3 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 4-0 | +18 / -14 | -14 / +8 |
UTSA has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings, but the Owls and Roadrunners did not meet last season. We're looking at a total in the mid-70s for this American Conference clash, and after a quick look at Florida Atlantic's schedule logs, it's easy to see why. The over is 7-1 in FAU's games this season, with each of the last five games clearing the 60-point mark. One week after hitting the century mark with Rice, the Owls nearly did it again last week in a 48-41 loss to North Texas. UTSA is coming off its bye week, and it probably came at an ideal time for the Roadrunners. UTSA's lone loss this season came at Texas in Week 3 (no shame in that), and the Roadrunners have thrown their name into the College Football Playoff discussion. While UTSA isn't putting up quite the same gaudy totals each week, the over is still 4-1 in the Roadrunners' last four games. UTSA enjoys a very strong home field advantage at the Alamo Dome in San Antonio, but road travels have given the Roadrunners problems in the past. UTSA is only 5-5 against the spread in its last ten road games. The Roadrunners lost at Temple as a 6.5-point road favorite last year and they nearly lost as a 12.5-point road favorite this year (won by two). We wouldn't be shocked if this was a back-and-forth affair. Just like last season, Florida Atlantic has attempted the fourth-most fourth down conversions in the country (led the nation with 62 last year). Be prepared for some high-variance plays in this one, but if the ball bounces in FAU's favor, the Owls can pull the upset.
Play Florida Atlantic
| Tex San Antonio | 37 / 25.7 | +11.3 | 28 | 33 | -4.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Florida Atlantic | 38.7 / 51 | -12.3 | 37 | 36 | +3 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Tex San Antonio | 10-24 | @ Tulane | -3 | 51.5 | 42-19 | Florida Atlantic | 10-29 | @ North Tex. | +15.5 | 78.5 | 41-48 |
| | 10-17 | Navy | -5.5 | 53 | 38-34 | | 10-24 | Rice | -9 | 55 | 51-49 |
| | 10-08 | South Flo. | -5.5 | 49.5 | 31-24 | | 10-17 | @ Army | +2 | 55.5 | 24-56 |
| Tex San Antonio |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-1 , PSR:5-2-1 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UT Rio Grande Valley | -28 | W | 45-16 | OV | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas State | 1.5 | W | 31-26 | UN | 65.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 14 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas | 30 | W | 6-30 | UN | 58.5 | 7.5 | W | 3-10 | UN | 13.5 | 18 | W | 3-20 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado State | -14 | PK | 59-45 | OV | 56.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | W | 35-21 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Rice | -11.5 | L | 16-14 | UN | 56 | -3.5 | L | 6-7 | OV | 12.5 | -6.5 | W | 16-7 | UN | 28 |
| 10-08-26 | South Florida | -5.5 | W | 31-24 | OV | 49.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10 | -3 | L | 10-17 | OV | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Navy | -5.5 | L | 38-34 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | -3 | L | 21-20 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Tulane | -3 | W | 42-19 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 21-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 11-05-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida Atlantic |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:7-1-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:6-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Florida | 25.5 | L | 21-66 | OV | 59.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | L | 14-38 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Navy | 4.5 | W | 38-30 | OV | 59.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | 3 | W | 31-7 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida Intl | -5 | W | 16-10 | UN | 62.5 | -1.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | PK | 10-7 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ UL Monroe | -12 | W | 45-17 | OV | 58 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | W | 35-17 | OV | 29 |
| 10-03-26 | Texas Southern | -47 | W | 66-10 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 28-3 | OV | | | W | 49-10 | OV | |
| 10-17-26 | @ Army | 2 | L | 24-56 | OV | 55.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 14-35 | OV | 27 |
| 10-24-26 | Rice | -9 | L | 51-49 | OV | 55 | -2.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -6 | L | 23-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-29-26 | @ North Texas | 15.5 | W | 41-48 | OV | 78.5 | 3.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 16.5 | 9 | W | 24-24 | OV | 40 |
| 11-05-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| James Madison | 45 | -13.5 | 30 | -16 | 28 | 42 | 4-1 / 3-1 | 4-1 / 2-2 | 3-2 / 2-2 | +28.6 / +9.8 | -18.5 / -5.5 |
| So Mississippi | 23 | 59 | 47(1) | | 48 | 51 | 2-2 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 2-2 | +3 / -11.3 | +0.5 / +14 |
James Madison won the lone meeting between these teams in October 2024. The Dukes had two extra days to prep for this one after losing at home to Troy last Thursday. This is the first time since the end of the 2024-25 season that James Madison has lost back-to-back games. Running back George Pettaway (6.6 yards per carry with eight TDs) missed last week's loss to Troy with a lower-body injury and he is not expected to return for this one. The Dukes were only able to generate 3.8 yards per carry against the Trojans last week, although senior Seth Cromwell showed some pop. After a five-game losing streak earlier this season, Southern Miss has now won back-to-back games over Louisiana and UL-Monroe. Some early money has shown on the over in this contest, and we agree with it. The Eagles' last four games have seen an average of 61.8 points per game (3-1 to the over). Perhaps James Madison was beginning to feel the pressure of a 7-0 start with a potential College Football Playoff discussion looming. With those plans now out the window after back-to-back losses, the Dukes can probably play with a little more freedom against one of the worst defenses in the Sun Belt.
Play the Over
11/02 1:41 PM PST — James Madison running back George Pettaway (6.6 yards per carry with eight TDs) missed last week's loss to Troy with a lower-body injury and he is questionable to return for this one.
| James Madison | 33.7 / 26.7 | +7 | 27 | 41 | -12.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| So Mississippi | 27.7 / 25 | +2.7 | 48 | 42 | +4.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| James Madison | 10-29 | Troy | -17.5 | 52 | 21-24 | So Mississippi | 10-31 | @ UL Monroe | -3.5 | 55 | 35-21 |
| | 10-22 | @ Appalachi. | -11.5 | 57 | 31-34 | | 10-24 | Louisiana | +11.5 | 52.5 | 35-31 |
| | 10-17 | Georgia S. | -8 | 58 | 49-22 | | 10-17 | Arkansas . | +5.5 | 61 | 13-23 |
| James Madison |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-2 , PSR:6-3 , O/U:5-4-0 | 1Q SUR:8-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1H SUR:8-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:4-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Liberty | -6 | W | 20-13 | UN | 51 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Wagner | -46.5 | W | 87-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 42-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Diego State | 3 | W | 26-13 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 19-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Old Dominion | -7 | W | 46-20 | OV | 44 | -0.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | W | 30-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Marshall | -14.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 55.5 | -5.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -9 | W | 38-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Southern | -7 | L | 27-24 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 6-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia State | -8 | W | 49-22 | OV | 58 | -3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -6 | W | 35-10 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-22-26 | @ Appalachian St | -11.5 | L | 31-34 | OV | 57 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | L | 14-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-29-26 | Troy | -17.5 | L | 21-24 | UN | 52 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -10 | W | 21-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 11-05-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| So Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Alcorn State | -19.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 21-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Auburn | 32 | L | 8-43 | UN | 56.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 8-27 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Connecticut | 3.5 | L | 20-48 | OV | 54.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 12.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-27 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tulane | 18 | W | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 10 | W | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-06-26 | @ Troy | 9.5 | L | 34-55 | OV | 51.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas St | 5.5 | L | 13-23 | UN | 61 | 0.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-16 | UN | 31 |
| 10-24-26 | Louisiana | 11.5 | W | 35-31 | OV | 52.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | W | 21-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ UL Monroe | -3.5 | W | 35-21 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -2 | W | 10-0 | UN | 28 |
| 11-05-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
November 6th
| Key Release | | Updated: 11/04 12:12 am |
| Virginia Tech | 31 | 57 | 20 | | 19 | 20 | 3-1 / 3-1 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 4-0 / 1-3 | +25.3 / +3.8 | -20.5 / -6.5 |
| SMU | 27 | -6 | 16(2) | -6 | 15 | 28 | 5-0 / 1-2 | 2-2-1 / 0-2-1 | 2-3 / 1-2 | +22.8 / -3.3 | -22.5 / -2.5 |
Can we get one complete effort, SMU? Just one? The Pony Express has looked like it could compete with Seattle Slew at times this season, and at other times, would struggle to compete in an $8K maiden claiming race at Mountaineer Park. The Mustangs suffered their second loss of the season, falling at Syracuse as an 8.5-point road favorite. We don't want to penalize SMU TOO much for that defeat because the Orange have done a nice job masking their available quarterbacks on a week-to-week basis and Steve Angeli may have caught the Mustangs by surprise. But last week's result is just the latest in a long string of not-quite-60-minute efforts from the Mustangs. The week prior against Cal, SMU trailed 20-17 at halftime as a three-touchdown home favorite. A 23-13 home win over Virginia isn't holding up very well considering the Cavaliers just lost 51-7 against Wake Forest last week. SMU only led Missouri State 14-10 at halftime and that was a three-point game midway through the fourth quarter before the Mustangs earned a couple late scores. Do you trust this team to lay points right now? We certainly don't. Virginia Tech is coming off its bye week after a pair of wins over Georgia Tech and Clemson. The Hokies already have road wins at Maryland (when they were playing well), Boston College and Clemson. Va Tech's lone road loss came at Cal when the Golden Bears scored the game-winning touchdown with 18 seconds left. SMU quarterback Kevin Jennings is having a fantastic season, but he's not getting a consistent weekly effort from the players around him. Also, James Franklin should have a pretty good idea what to expect from Jennings and head coach Rhett Lashlee considering his Nittany Lions beat SMU in the College Football Playoff less than two years ago.
Play Virginia Tech
| Virginia Tech | 24.7 / 21.7 | +3 | 19 | 24 | -6 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| SMU | 36.3 / 21 | +15.3 | 15 | 25 | -12 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-0-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Virginia Tech | 10-24 | @ Clemson | +2.5 | 50 | 20-16 | SMU | 10-31 | @ Syracuse | -8 | 58.5 | 27-30 |
| | 10-17 | Georgia T. | -9 | 55 | 34-24 | | 10-24 | California | -18.5 | 55.5 | 59-20 |
| | 10-10 | @ California | -11 | 52 | 20-25 | | 10-17 | Virginia | -10 | 51 | 23-13 |
| Virginia Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:6-0 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:8-0 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | VMI | -54.5 | W | 73-3 | OV | 60.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 45-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Old Dominion | -18 | W | 44-21 | OV | 47.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-3 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | W | 34-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | W | 35-26 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -0.5 | W | 27-14 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Boston College | -14.5 | L | 21-14 | UN | 45.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Pittsburgh U | -1 | L | 33-35 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 24-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ California | -11 | L | 20-25 | UN | 52 | -2.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-10 | UN | 27 |
| 10-17-26 | Georgia Tech | -9 | W | 34-24 | OV | 55 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -6 | W | 24-3 | UN | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Clemson | 2.5 | W | 20-16 | UN | 50 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 11-06-26 | @ SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| SMU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:2-4-2 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:0-7 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:6-2 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:2-4-1 |
| 09-07-26 | @ Florida State | -3 | PK | 27-24 | UN | 52.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -1.5 | W | 17-10 | P | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | UC Davis | -32.5 | W | 56-10 | OV | 59 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Louisville | 3 | L | 31-41 | OV | 57.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri State | -30.5 | L | 34-24 | UN | 59.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 14.5 | -19.5 | L | 14-10 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Boston College | -21.5 | L | 25-16 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 6-10 | OV | 13.5 | -13 | L | 13-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Virginia | -10 | PK | 23-13 | UN | 51 | -3.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-24-26 | California | -18.5 | W | 59-20 | OV | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 17-20 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Syracuse | -8 | L | 27-30 | UN | 58.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | -6 | L | 10-20 | UN | 30.5 |
| 11-06-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Florida | 19 | 39.5 | 34 | | 31 | 38 | 4-1 / 2-1 | 3-2 / 1-2 | 1-4 / 2-1 | +19 / +1.7 | -17 / -3 |
| East Carolina | 17 | -1 | 35.5(2) | -0.5 | 34 | 40 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 0-4 / 2-2 | +13.5 / -13.8 | -14.5 / +9 |
East Carolina has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings, although the Pirates and Bulls haven't shared the field since 2022. Both teams are coming off wins last week as ECU took down Temple, while South Florida handled UAB. The Bulls' 30-10 win over the Blazers looks awfully flattering considering USF generated 237 total yards and 13 first downs. The Bulls scored two touchdowns off UAB fumbles. South Florida QB Michael Van Buren Jr. did not finish last week's win with an undisclosed injury. Former Florida State transfer Luke Kromenhoek secured the victory and he may be in line for the start this week. Kromenhoek was a former 4-star recruit that was supposed to be the heir apparent in Tallahassee in 2024 after Florida State had its near-perfect season, but the Seminoles famously went 7-17 over the next two years and Kromenhoek never really got a fair shot at the gig. He's got a shot now, but his potential first start may come against one of the best defenses in the conference. The under is 4-1 in South Florida's last five games. The under is 6-1 in ECU's last seven games. This is a VERY low total, but it's there for a reason.
Play the Under
11/02 2:09 PM PST — South Florida QB Michael Van Buren Jr. did not finish last week's win over UAB with an undisclosed injury. Former Florida State transfer Luke Kromenhoek secured the win and he may be in line for the start this week.
| South Florida | 27.7 / 14.3 | +13.3 | 34 | 39 | -7.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| East Carolina | 22.7 / 26.7 | -4 | 35 | 36 | +0.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| South Florida | 10-31 | UAB | -7.5 | 43.5 | 30-10 | East Carolina | 10-31 | Temple | -4 | 51.5 | 17-9 |
| | 10-17 | Kent State | -20.5 | 45.5 | 29-2 | | 10-22 | @ Memphis | +10 | 55 | 34-41 |
| | 10-08 | @ Tex San A. | +5.5 | 49.5 | 24-31 | | 10-15 | @ UAB | -4.5 | 49 | 17-30 |
| South Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Florida Intl | -14.5 | L | 19-9 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 6-0 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Army | 3 | W | 28-24 | OV | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 23 |
| 09-19-26 | Delaware State | -37.5 | W | 59-17 | OV | 60 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 28-17 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Bowling Green | -17.5 | L | 14-6 | UN | 49 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -9.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Temple | -5 | L | 13-17 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | 5.5 | L | 24-31 | OV | 49.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10 | 3 | W | 17-10 | OV | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Kent State | -20.5 | W | 29-2 | UN | 45.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-2 | UN | 9.5 | -11.5 | L | 10-2 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | UAB | -7.5 | W | 30-10 | UN | 43.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 7.5 | -4 | W | 17-10 | OV | 21.5 |
| 11-06-26 | @ East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| East Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:0-7-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Alabama | 28 | L | 10-48 | OV | 52.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 16.5 | L | 7-38 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Appalachian St | -6.5 | L | 24-27 | UN | 55.5 | -3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13 | -4 | L | 10-17 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Old Dominion | 2.5 | W | 20-17 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | NC Central | -37.5 | L | 42-9 | UN | 58 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 42-3 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | Rice | -10 | W | 28-12 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-15-26 | @ UAB | -4.5 | L | 17-30 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 14-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-22-26 | @ Memphis | 10 | W | 34-41 | OV | 55 | 2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 12.5 | 6.5 | W | 16-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Temple | -4 | W | 17-9 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 10-3 | UN | 26 |
| 11-06-26 | South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nebraska | 23 | -4.5 | 17 | | 15 | 21 | 4-2 / 1-1 | 4-2 / 2-0 | 3-3 / 0-2 | +19.8 / +7.5 | -16 / +0.5 |
| Illinois | 24 | 52 | 17(2) | -2 | 19 | 30 | 3-2 / 2-1 | 2-3 / 1-1-1 | 3-2 / 2-1 | +11.4 / -6.3 | -13 / +7 |
Illinois is 4-1 straight-up and against the spread over the last five meetings, with the last one being a 31-24 road win in overtime in 2024. Things got pretty ugly in Lincoln after Nebraska's 17-10 home loss to Washington. The Huskers held a lead for over 45 minutes in that contest as Washington didn't find the end zone until there was 1:30 remaining in the fourth quarter. Nebraska out-gained the Huskies by 120 yards but couldn't overcome three interceptions by Anthony Colandrea, including a pick-six in the final seconds that gave Washington the cushion it needed to pull away. That was the third game in a row where Big Red blew a fourth quarter lead, and what looked like a promising season a month ago is now heading toward the Pinstripe Bowl. Things got pretty heated inside Memorial Stadium during the closing minutes, and a fan reportedly cursed out Matt Rhule's 13-year-old daughter. Things are looking a little better in Champaign at the moment where the Illini have won each of their last three games. Illinois got some positive news last week as starting QB Katin Houser returned from injury a little earlier than expected in last week's win over Maryland. Houser had some rust to shake off, but considering the Illini went 2-0 without him, vibes should be pretty high for Bret Bielema's squad. Illinois' defense isn't as good as it has been in year's past, but we're certainly not looking to lay points on the road with Nebraska right now after the Huskers scored 17, 14 and 10 points across their last three games.
Play Illinois
| Nebraska | 13.7 / 18 | -4.3 | 14 | 12 | +2.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Illinois | 26.3 / 21.3 | +5 | 22 | 22 | +1.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Nebraska | 10-31 | Washingto. | -7.5 | 49.5 | 10-17 | Illinois | 10-31 | @ Maryland | -3 | 54.5 | 20-17 |
| | 10-17 | @ Oregon | +6 | 51 | 14-17 | | 10-24 | Oregon | +10.5 | 49 | 21-10 |
| | 10-10 | Indiana | +9 | 48.5 | 17-20 | | 10-10 | @ Michigan . | -2.5 | 48.5 | 38-37 |
| Nebraska |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:8-0 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Ohio | -23.5 | W | 49-21 | OV | 47.5 | -7 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10 | -13.5 | L | 14-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Bowling Green | -31 | W | 56-7 | OV | 49 | -7 | W | 14-0 | OV | 11.5 | -17.5 | W | 35-0 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Dakota | -27.5 | L | 34-7 | UN | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 17-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Michigan State | -5.5 | W | 31-13 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | W | 24-10 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Maryland | -14.5 | W | 48-23 | OV | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-16 | OV | 12.5 | -8.5 | L | 28-23 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Indiana | 9 | W | 17-20 | UN | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | 5.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oregon | 6 | W | 14-17 | UN | 51 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 26 |
| 10-31-26 | Washington U | -7.5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 49.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 24 |
| 11-06-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-03-26 | UAB | -25.5 | L | 42-23 | OV | 54 | -7 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | L | 21-13 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Duke | -6 | L | 27-31 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Southern Illinois | -35 | W | 48-10 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Ohio State | 26 | W | 19-42 | OV | 53.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | L | 10-28 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Purdue | -9 | L | 17-24 | UN | 62 | -2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6 | L | 7-13 | UN | 31 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Michigan State | -2.5 | L | 38-37 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | Oregon | 10.5 | W | 21-10 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Maryland | -3 | PK | 20-17 | UN | 54.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 27.5 |
| 11-06-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Mexico | 17 | -10.5 | 23 | -17 | 27 | 43 | 4-0 / 3-1 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 1-3 | +38.3 / +8 | -20.5 / -5 |
| Nevada | 12 | 38.5 | 42(2) | | 40 | 18 | 2-2 / 1-3 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 1-3 | +8.5 / -7.8 | +1 / +6 |
They’re now in the pole position (apparently) for the Group of 6 berth in the playoff, but the Lobos sure aren’t going full speed like Max Verstappen on Sunday in Mexico City. Style points won’t likely change the minds of the selection committee if New Mexico keeps winning, though Jason Eck has had a tough time of it in back-to-back 21-16 scorelines (vs. North Dakota State & San Jose State), and took an awfully long time before putting away a 2-win win Hawaii prior to that while also landing on...you guessed it, 21 points. Though with the nation’s top-ranked scoring defense (11.88 pg), 21 points is usually plenty, and a potentially lucrative fundamental matchup awaits in Reno as Jason Eck’s various ballhawks (who have recorded a nation’s-best 17 interceptions) might have eyes as wide as saucers at the potential prospect of going up against Wolf Pack QB Luke Duncan, who tossed three picks in the first 7:27 last Saturday vs. his old team UCLA (did Duncan maybe still think he was playing for the Bruins?) and forcing HC Jeff Choate to sub in recently-hurting AJ Bianco. Though Bianco or early-season starter Carter Jones (also recently hurting) are both higher on the depth chart and don’t figure to be as generous as Duncan, so we’ll see if Eck’s fire-drill offense can maybe smooth out of its own rough spots with QB Toa Fa’avae, who has turned mistake-prone (just 1 TD pass vs. 6 picks) across the past three games. As for Choate, he might be better-advised for this offense to go direct-snaps to RBs Herschel Turner and Dominic Kelley and not risk mistakes, because his gnarly defense (allowing only 21.8 ppg, and which flustered the fifth-ranked Bruins for much of last Saturday) is capable of keeping the Pack within earshot. With several challenging Mountain West dates still to come, no surprise if New Mexico keeps making hard work for itself and flying close to the flame in November.
Play the Under
11/03 11:46 AM PST — Note that the Wolf Pack gave UCLA transfer Luke Duncan, usually third on the depth chart, a second straight start last week at the Rose Bowl vs. his former Bruins team, but after tossing three picks in the first 7:27 was pulled by HC Jeff Choate in favor of normal backup AJ Bianco, who had been dealing with an ankle sprain but was available if needed...and he became needed early thanks to Duncan's mistakes. First-stringer Carter Jones has been sidelined in recent weeks due to an elbow issue and he is doubtful again this week.
| New Mexico | 21 / 14 | +7 | 27 | 38 | -11.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Nevada | 15 / 23.7 | -8.7 | 41 | 30 | +10.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| New Mexico | 10-31 | @ San Jose . | -15.5 | 44 | 21-16 | Nevada | 10-31 | @ UCLA | +22.5 | 43 | 0-27 |
| | 10-24 | North Dak. | -4.5 | 39 | 21-16 | | 10-24 | San Jose . | -6 | 46 | 28-13 |
| | 10-17 | @ Hawaii | -14.5 | 46.5 | 21-10 | | 10-17 | @ North Dak. | +15 | 42.5 | 17-31 |
|
| 10-18-25 | Nevada | 22 | 49.5 | 16 | 28/55 | 23/29/0/202 | 0/0 |
| New Mexico | 24 | -13.5 | 22 | 42/210 | 14/22/0/138 | 3/2 |
| New Mexico |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:6-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:1-6-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Central Michigan | -11 | W | 38-7 | UN | 47.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Mercyhurst | -42.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 54.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Oklahoma | 21.5 | W | 6-14 | UN | 45.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 12.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | @ New Mexico State | -11.5 | W | 42-18 | OV | 47.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -7 | W | 14-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | UTEP | -23.5 | W | 61-7 | OV | 47.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -14 | W | 21-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Hawaii | -14.5 | L | 21-10 | UN | 46.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | North Dakota State | -4.5 | W | 21-16 | UN | 39 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 7.5 | -3 | W | 14-3 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ San Jose State | -15.5 | L | 21-16 | UN | 44 | -2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -8.5 | L | 14-9 | OV | 21.5 |
| 11-06-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nevada |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Kentucky | 0 | W | 49-14 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 21-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Montana State | 4.5 | L | 7-20 | UN | 51.5 | | L | 0-10 | OV | | | L | 0-17 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | -3.5 | L | 20-27 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Air Force | 4.5 | W | 33-36 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ UTEP | -10 | W | 30-13 | UN | 48.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 13-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ North Dakota State | 15 | W | 17-31 | OV | 42.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 7.5 | L | 11-19 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | San Jose State | -6 | W | 28-13 | UN | 46 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ UCLA | 22.5 | L | 0-27 | UN | 43 | 5.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | 13 | L | 0-17 | UN | 23 |
| 11-06-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| TCU | 16 | 47.5 | 22 | | 20 | 23 | 3-2 / 1-1 | 2-2-1 / 1-1 | 1-4 / 0-2 | +15 / +1.5 | -15 / 0 |
| Arizona U | 29 | -6 | 18(2) | -6 | 18 | 12 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 1-3 | 1-3 / 3-1 | +29 / +3 | -22 / -1 |
They’re starting to grumble in Fort Worth, and Sonny Dykes was likely saved from a very uncomfortable week when his Horned Frogs rallied from a 13-0 halftime deficit to collar Kansas at the wire last Saturday at Amon Carter Stadium. Ivy League transfer QB Jaden Craig might have done more than save the game for TCU with his 17-yard TD scramble with just over a minute to play, as Big XII sources report complaints have escalated alarmingly among the Frog support base that has noted how far the program has dropped from that flash title game appearance in 2022 during Dykes’ first year in charge. The offense, in particular, has become “offensive” this season with Craig unable to light the fuse, and they would like a bit more entertainment in the Metroplex than this 101st-ranked scoring offense (23.2 ppg; take away the 94 points scored vs. Grambling and Arkansas State and the average is barely 19 points) has delivered. Fortunately for Dykes, his robust defense (which hasn’t allowed more than 21 points vs. any foe and ranks 8th nationally in scoring at just 14.1 ppg) has kept the Frogs in every game and is the best path to bowl eligibility, but keeping a potent Arizona strike force and four-year QB Noah Fifita (19 TD passes and just 4 picks) in check is going to be quite a chore. We suppose we'll also see if the ‘Cats are down in the dumps after a realistic chance to enter the playoff conversation were perhaps irreparably harmed last Saturday at Texas Tech when the Red Raiders snuck in ex-Florida State Tommy Castellanos at QB in the last minute, but Arizona isn’t mathematically out of the Big XII race just yet and does get a shot at current league leader Utah in Tucson next week. After scoring nearly 38 points per game the past six weeks, the ‘Cats look more likely to fire the majority of scoring shots and cause Dykes some more grief with his reportedly diminishing support base.
Play Arizona
| TCU | 19.7 / 15.3 | +4.3 | 21 | 24 | -4 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Arizona U | 39 / 22.7 | +16.3 | 19 | 22 | -4 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| TCU | 10-31 | Kansas | -6 | 46 | 22-16 | Arizona U | 10-31 | @ Texas Tech | +4 | 55 | 26-34 |
| | 10-24 | West Virg. | -10 | 58.5 | 20-24 | | 10-24 | Iowa State | -12 | 51.5 | 39-3 |
| | 10-17 | @ Baylor | +3.5 | 50.5 | 17-6 | | 10-10 | @ West Virg. | -3.5 | 61.5 | 52-31 |
|
| 11-23-24 | Arizona U | 28 | 60 | 16 | 22/38 | 30/47/1/287 | 0/0 |
| TCU | 49 | -10.5 | 24 | 38/147 | 21/29/1/303 | 1/1 |
| TCU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:1-7-0 | 1Q SUR:4-1 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:0-6-1 |
| 08-29-26 | North Carolina | -7.5 | L | 10-15 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | L | 10-12 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Grambling | -44.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Arkansas St | -19 | W | 31-7 | UN | 56.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -10.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Central Florida | -3.5 | L | 13-21 | UN | 48 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2 | L | 10-14 | P | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | BYU | 5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 7-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Baylor | 3.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-6 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | West Virginia | -10 | L | 20-24 | UN | 58.5 | -1.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 30 |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas | -6 | PK | 22-16 | UN | 46 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 0-13 | UN | 22.5 |
| 11-06-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:7-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northern Arizona | -33.5 | L | 35-7 | UN | 59.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ BYU | 6.5 | L | 17-28 | UN | 48.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | No Illinois | -34.5 | L | 42-17 | OV | 50 | -7.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 28-10 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington State | -11 | L | 34-24 | OV | 47 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | Cincinnati U | -7 | W | 34-7 | UN | 56.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ West Virginia | -3.5 | W | 52-31 | OV | 61.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -1.5 | W | 24-17 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa State | -12 | W | 39-3 | UN | 51.5 | -2.5 | W | 15-3 | OV | 9.5 | -7 | W | 25-3 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas Tech | 4 | L | 26-34 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 2.5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 11-06-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
November 7th
| Central Florida | 20 | 48 | 24 | | 26 | 24 | 4-1 / 0-3 | 3-2 / 1-1-1 | 4-1 / 1-2 | +13 / -9.7 | -9.5 / +9 |
| Kansas | 27 | -6 | 23(2) | -3 | 24 | 22 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 2-1-1 / 0-2-1 | 2-1 / 2-1 | +21 / -11.3 | -15.5 / +8 |
Kansas has won-and-covered each of the two meetings since UCF joined the Big XII, including a 27-20 road win in Orlando last season. The Knights out-gained the Jayhawks in that contest and held a 21-15 advantage in first downs, but couldn't overcome a costly fumble. UCF scored all 20 of its points in the first half and was held scoreless after halftime. UCF is licking its wounds after a 41-9 home loss to Baylor last week. It appears that James Madison transfer Alonza Barnett is set to resume his duties as Knights' starting QB. Barnett missed five games with a hamstring injury as Florida International transfer Keyone Jenkins led the offense. Jenkins suffered an ankle injury in last week's loss to Baylor, and is not expected to be cleared for this one. Kansas has lost three of its last four games, and ironically, the Jayhawks' lone win during this run came against the Baylor team that gave UCF so many problems last week. Kansas QB Isaiah Marshall did not play in last week's loss at TCU after suffering a lower-leg injury the previous week against Baylor. Cole Ballard, who has four years of experience in the Jayhawks' program, went 20-of-35 for 285 yards against the Horned Frogs. UCF enjoys a nice home field advantage at The Bounce House in Orlando, but the Knights have been a different team on the road. Since the beginning of last season, UCF has gone 0-8 straight-up, 3-5 against the spread away from home.
Play Kansas
11/02 1:34 PM PST — Keyone Jenkins suffered an ankle injury in last week's loss to Baylor, and is not expected to be cleared for this one. James Madison transfer Alonza Barnett is set to resume his original duties as Knights' starting QB before he missed five games with a hamstring injury.
11/02 2:17 PM PST — Kansas QB Isaiah Marshall did not play in last week's loss at TCU after suffering a lower-leg injury the previous week against Baylor. Cole Ballard, who has four years of experience in the Jayhawks' program, went 20-of-35 for 285 yards against the Horned Frogs.
| Central Florida | 25.3 / 38 | -12.7 | 27 | 20 | +6.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Kansas | 21.7 / 27 | -5.3 | 24 | 21 | +2.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-0-1 / 0-1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Central Florida | 10-30 | Baylor | +2.5 | 49.5 | 9-41 | Kansas | 10-31 | @ TCU | +6 | 46 | 16-22 |
| | 10-24 | BYU | +7.5 | 44 | 39-31 | | 10-24 | Baylor | -1 | 54.5 | 25-24 |
| | 10-10 | @ Oklahoma . | +10 | 53.5 | 28-42 | | 10-17 | @ Kansas St. | +3 | 55 | 24-35 |
|
| 10-04-25 | Kansas | 27 | -4.5 | 15 | 30/123 | 18/26/0/235 | 0/0 |
| Central Florida | 20 | 54 | 21 | 39/199 | 22/37/0/176 | 1/1 |
| Central Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-3-1 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:5-2-1 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:5-2-1 |
| 09-03-26 | Bethune Cookman | -43.5 | W | 73-6 | OV | 58.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 38-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 7 | W | 7-12 | UN | 55 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 13 | 4.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia State | -17.5 | L | 44-30 | OV | 50.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 20-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | TCU | 3.5 | W | 21-13 | UN | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2 | W | 14-10 | P | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Houston U | 10 | PK | 17-27 | UN | 50 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma State | 10 | L | 28-42 | OV | 53.5 | 2.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | BYU | 7.5 | W | 39-31 | OV | 44 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 4 | W | 17-14 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-30-26 | Baylor | 2.5 | L | 9-41 | OV | 49.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 6-20 | OV | 24 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-4-2 , O/U:4-3-1 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:5-0-1 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Long Island | -44.5 | W | 51-6 | P | 57 | | W | 6-0 | OV | | | W | 30-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | Missouri | 4.5 | L | 21-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | W | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Arizona State | 5.5 | L | 17-24 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | PK | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Middle Tenn St | -21.5 | W | 55-0 | OV | 51 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -11.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Utah | 15.5 | L | 24-41 | OV | 49.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 17-21 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Kansas State | 3 | L | 24-35 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 13.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-18 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | Baylor | -1 | PK | 25-24 | UN | 54.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | 7-7 | UN | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | @ TCU | 6 | PK | 16-22 | UN | 46 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 13-0 | UN | 22.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Carolina | 27 | -7.5 | 21.5 | -15.5 | 23 | 4 | 1-3 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 3-1 / 1-2 | +4.3 / 0 | -2.5 / +3 |
| Connecticut | 17 | 55.5 | 38(1) | | 40 | 37 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 2-2 | +10.8 / +7.5 | -4 / +1 |
Based on some early-week content that we have consumed this week, there is likely going to be some back-and-forth action on this game. Those looking to back UConn will point to North Carolina's schedule and the presumed let-down spot after the Tar Heels lost back-to-back games against Syracuse and Miami (Fla) by a total of four points. Add those to weather-related losses to Notre Dame and Clemson, and North Carolina has been snakebitten for large stretches of the season. We're not ready to buy into that narrative just yet. There's about ten programs in the country where you can ignore "letdown spot" narratives (i.e. the military academies), and a Bill Belichick-coached team is probably one of them. You think the guy that has over 300 wins in the NFL is going to let his team have a let-down spot? Especially in the northeast where he's still got quite a following? Don't forget, the Tar Heels didn't make a bowl game last season, so simply reaching six wins and going to a bowl game is still a goal for this team. Realistically, how much can you downgrade North Carolina after these recent losses? They certainly stung, but the Tar Heels have covered the spread in four of the last five games. So you can't downgrade UNC from a power ratings perspective, because they've actually overperformed expectations. The team that fell short of expectations last week is UConn, who couldn't beat Air Force with an ex-linebacker playing quarterback that didn't complete a pass. The Huskies just played at altitude in the Mountain Time Zone and had to defend 74 Air Force rushing plays. We'll make the argument that UConn is the team on letdown alert this week, not North Carolina.
Play North Carolina
| North Carolina | 29.7 / 29.7 | 0 | 22 | 18 | +2.5 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Connecticut | 31.7 / 23.7 | +8 | 39 | 40 | -2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| North Carolina | 10-31 | Miami Flo. | +13 | 53 | 35-38 | Connecticut | 10-31 | @ Air Force | +2 | 52.5 | 26-35 |
| | 10-24 | Syracuse | -8 | 49.5 | 30-31 | | 10-23 | Massachus. | -12 | 53.5 | 35-16 |
| | 10-17 | @ Duke | +3 | 47 | 24-20 | | 10-10 | @ Temple | +3.5 | 55.5 | 34-20 |
|
| 12-28-24 | Connecticut | 27 | 53.5 | 20 | 46/210 | 16/24/0/151 | 1/0 |
| North Carolina | 14 | -2 | 10 | 28/96 | 11/14/1/110 | 1/0 |
| North Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ TCU | 7.5 | W | 15-10 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | W | 12-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | East Tennessee State | -36.5 | L | 35-3 | UN | 55 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 21-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Clemson | 3 | L | 20-28 | OV | 44.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 7.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-6 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Notre Dame | 21 | W | 26-37 | OV | 46.5 | 5.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 11 | W | 14-21 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 3.5 | W | 21-17 | UN | 47.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Duke | 3 | W | 24-20 | UN | 47 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Syracuse | -8 | L | 30-31 | OV | 49.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | -5.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | Miami Florida | 13 | W | 35-38 | OV | 53 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | W | 14-17 | OV | 27 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Connecticut |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lafayette | -21.5 | W | 56-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Maryland | 11 | L | 14-38 | UN | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 7 | L | 7-17 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ So Mississippi | -3.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 54.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 27-6 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Miami Ohio | 2.5 | L | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Syracuse | 6.5 | W | 41-42 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-6 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 14-27 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Temple | 3.5 | W | 34-20 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 10.5 | 3 | W | 24-17 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-23-26 | Massachusetts | -12 | W | 35-16 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | W | 21-3 | UN | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Air Force | 2 | L | 26-35 | OV | 52.5 | 0 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 26 |
| 11-07-26 | North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida State | 24 | -5.5 | 23 | -6.5 | 19 | 21 | 3-2 / 0-3 | 1-3-1 / 2-1 | 1-4 / 3-0 | +12 / -15.3 | -15.5 / +14 |
| Boston College | 20 | 53.5 | 30.5(1) | | 32 | 21 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 1-3 / 1-2 | +3 / -12.8 | -5 / +10.5 |
Boston College has covered the spread in each of the last two meetings, including a 28-13 road win in Tallahassee as a 16.5-point road 'dog in 2024. Florida State fired head coach Mike Norvell following Saturday's 36-24 home loss to Clemson. The Seminoles were -4 in turnover differential and went 1-for-10 on third down against the Tigers. QB Ashton Daniels threw three interceptions and was sacked four times. Former Middle Tennessee head coach Rick Stockstill will lead the team through the end of the regular season. Stockstill, who played quarterback under Bobby Bowden in Tallahassee from 1977 to 1981, came back to Florida State in 2024 as director of scouting for the Seminoles' offense. During his introductory press conference, the 68-year-old said, "I'm going to bust my tail to give this program everything I have to make Coach Bowden and all the former players and our leadership proud of Florida State football.” Defensive coordinator Tony White was also fired on Sunday. Florida State's top receiver Duce Robinson (18.3 yards per reception with four touchdowns) suffered a torn ACL in last week's loss to Clemson and will miss the rest of the season. Stockstill's first order of business is to clean up all of the turnovers and mistakes. In our opinion, that is likely going to lead toward a somewhat-vanilla gameplan for Daniels to follow. The under is 5-2-1 in Boston College's games this season. The Eagles' offense didn't score a single point last week at Duke. We believe Stockstill can get the Seminoles buttoned-up, but it may come at the expense of some explosiveness.
Play the Under
11/03 10:55 AM PST — Florida State's top receiver Duce Robinson (18.3 yards per reception with four touchdowns) suffered a torn ACL in last week's loss to Clemson and will miss the rest of the season.
| Florida State | 26.3 / 41 | -14.7 | 19 | 14 | +6.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Boston College | 26 / 31.7 | -5.7 | 31 | 23 | +6.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Florida State | 10-31 | Clemson | -5 | 50.5 | 24-36 | Boston College | 10-31 | @ Duke | +7 | 49 | 2-47 |
| | 10-17 | @ Miami Flo. | +20.5 | 57 | 35-43 | | 10-24 | @ Georgia T. | +6.5 | 50 | 49-27 |
| | 10-09 | @ Louisville | +4 | 61 | 20-44 | | 10-17 | Pittsburg. | +6.5 | 42.5 | 27-21 |
| Florida State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-4-1 |
| 08-29-26 | New Mexico State | -31 | L | 34-17 | UN | 53.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -18.5 | L | 17-7 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-07-26 | SMU | 3 | PK | 24-27 | UN | 52.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-17 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Alabama | 18 | W | 36-50 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 21-26 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Central Arkansas | -45.5 | L | 34-7 | UN | 63 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 24-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Virginia | 0 | W | 38-7 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 0 | W | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ Louisville | 4 | L | 20-44 | OV | 61 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | W | 14-14 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Miami Florida | 20.5 | W | 35-43 | OV | 57 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11.5 | W | 14-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Clemson | -5 | L | 24-36 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-23 | OV | 25.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Boston College |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:2-5-1 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Cincinnati U | 7 | L | 15-34 | UN | 51.5 | 3 | PK | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | L | 0-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Rutgers | -3 | W | 28-21 | UN | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Maine | -37.5 | L | 22-16 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 16-0 | OV | | | W | 19-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Virginia Tech | 14.5 | W | 14-21 | UN | 45.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ SMU | 21.5 | W | 16-25 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-6 | OV | 13.5 | 13 | W | 10-13 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Pittsburgh U | 6.5 | W | 27-21 | OV | 42.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-12 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 14-12 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Georgia Tech | 6.5 | W | 49-27 | OV | 50 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 12-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Duke | 7 | L | 2-47 | P | 49 | 0.5 | L | 2-13 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | L | 2-27 | OV | 24 |
| 11-07-26 | Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Maryland | 27 | 57 | 28 | | 25 | 22 | 1-4 / 1-2 | 1-3-1 / 2-1 | 4-1 / 2-1 | -1.6 / -10 | -8.5 / +11.5 |
| Purdue | 24 | -5.5 | 26.5(1) | -2.5 | 26 | 20 | 2-3 / 1-2 | 2-3 / 1-2 | 5-0 / 1-2 | 0 / -7 | -1 / +11 |
This is the first meeting between the Boilermakers and Terps since Purdue's 31-29 road win at Maryland in 2022. Both teams are looking to snap losing skids. Maryland showed plenty of fight in its first game without former head coach Mike Locksley, but the end result was the same as the five games that came before it. The Terps' defense had its best performance in a while, holding Illinois to 20 points. Purdue is coming off back-to-back double-digit losses to Washington and Penn State. A blocked punt returned for a touchdown helped the Boilermakers stay competitive for a while in Happy Valley, but Purdue's offense couldn't get anything going against the Nittany Lions' defense. Something's gotta give in West Lafayette, and we're inclined to back the Terps to snap their six-game losing streak. Maryland only committed one penalty for five yards and QB Malik Washington was only sacked one time, showing that the Terps were capable of playing clean, mostly-mistake-free football against Illinois. We have our doubts that Purdue escaped Beaver Stadium in good health last week. Purdue's defense was on the field for over 43 minutes last week as the Nittany Lions ran 76 plays compared to just 44 from the Boilermakers. QB Ryan Browne went 10-for-29 with two interceptions and running back Fame Ijeboi produced 20 yards on 11 carries. Purdue hasn't been manhandled like that in a while, and it feels like the Boilermakers may need a little more time to shake off what happened last week.
Play Maryland
| Maryland | 21 / 34 | -13 | 28 | 18 | +9.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Purdue | 28 / 27.3 | +0.7 | 25 | 21 | +3 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Maryland | 10-31 | Illinois | +3 | 54.5 | 17-20 | Purdue | 10-31 | @ Penn State | +10 | 55.5 | 17-31 |
| | 10-17 | Rutgers | -5.5 | 56 | 30-37 | | 10-16 | Washingto. | -3 | 50.5 | 26-38 |
| | 10-10 | @ Ohio State | +31 | 56.5 | 16-45 | | 10-10 | Minnesota. | +2.5 | 48.5 | 41-13 |
| Maryland |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-6 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Hampton | -45.5 | W | 62-0 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 17-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Connecticut | -11 | W | 38-14 | UN | 52.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -7 | W | 17-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Virginia Tech | 2.5 | L | 26-35 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 0.5 | L | 14-27 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | UCLA | 2.5 | L | 3-54 | OV | 55.5 | 0 | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Nebraska | 14.5 | L | 23-48 | OV | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 16-7 | OV | 12.5 | 8.5 | W | 23-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Ohio State | 31 | W | 16-45 | OV | 56.5 | 7.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 18.5 | L | 10-31 | OV | 31 |
| 10-17-26 | Rutgers | -5.5 | L | 30-37 | OV | 56 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -3 | W | 23-13 | OV | 28 |
| 10-31-26 | Illinois | 3 | PK | 17-20 | UN | 54.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 27.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Purdue |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Indiana State | -35 | L | 44-19 | OV | 56 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 16-6 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Wake Forest | 2.5 | W | 36-38 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 1 | L | 10-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ UCLA | 13.5 | L | 38-52 | OV | 53 | 4.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Notre Dame | 27 | L | 10-49 | OV | 57 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 16.5 | L | 0-35 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Illinois | 9 | W | 24-17 | UN | 62 | 2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 6 | W | 13-7 | UN | 31 |
| 10-10-26 | Minnesota U | 2.5 | W | 41-13 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-16-26 | Washington U | -3 | L | 26-38 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 17-24 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Penn State | 10 | L | 17-31 | UN | 55.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UCLA | 20 | -3.5 | 12 | -5.5 | 18 | 40 | 5-0 / 3-0 | 5-0 / 3-0 | 1-4 / 2-1 | +17.4 / +24.7 | -13.5 / +1.5 |
| Minnesota U | 17 | 37.5 | 19.5(2) | | 20 | 8 | 4-1 / 1-2 | 4-1 / 2-1 | 1-4 / 2-1 | +14 / -10.7 | -10 / +10 |
Minnesota earned a 21-7 road win at UCLA in their lone meeting since the Bruins joined the Big Ten. UCLA resumes conference play after a brief detour last week as the Bruins handled business 27-0 in a non-league win over Nevada. UCLA is a perfect 8-0 straight-up and against the spread thus far. Since engaging in a high-scoring affair with Purdue in Week 3, the Bruins have allowed an average of 7.0 points per game over the last five contests. UCLA's last four games have all stayed under the total. Minnesota has thrived in the role of underdog this season, pulling off outright upset wins over Washington, Michigan and Iowa before taking Indiana to overtime last week as a three-touchdown underdog. This total is the lowest UCLA has seen in quite a while, but we'll make the argument that it isn't low enough. UCLA hasn't played a road game in four weeks, so it may take the Bruins' offense a series or two to get adjusted to playing on the road. Gophers head coach PJ Fleck clearly has a gameplan for how he wants to handle these games as an underdog, and the formula is working. Minnesota is 4-1 against the spread as an underdog this season, with four of those five games staying under the total. UCLA did have an early-season bye, which at the time, didn't feel like a bad thing for first-year head coach Bob Chesney. The early-week bye gave Chesney an opportunity to evaluate where his young program was at, but now that the Bruins are a legitimate threat to crash the Big Ten Championship Game and/or the College Football Playoff, this season has suddenly turned into a potential marathon. UCLA will close the season with eight-straight games, potentially nine if the Bruins make it to the conference title game. Coach Chesney has slowed things down for a reason in recent weeks.
Play the Under
| UCLA | 24 / 5.7 | +18.3 | 20 | 28 | -13.5 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 3-0 / 0-0 | 0-3 / 0-0 |
| Minnesota U | 14 / 24.7 | -10.7 | 20 | 17 | +8.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| UCLA | 10-31 | Nevada | -22.5 | 43 | 27-0 | Minnesota U | 10-31 | @ Indiana | +20.5 | 40 | 16-23 |
| | 10-24 | Michigan . | -16.5 | 44 | 28-10 | | 10-24 | Iowa | +7.5 | 41 | 13-10 |
| | 10-17 | Wisconsin | -1 | 43 | 17-7 | | 10-10 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | 48.5 | 13-41 |
| UCLA |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:8-0 , PSR:8-0 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1H SUR:7-0 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:2-6-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ California | -2.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 24-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | San Diego State | -13.5 | W | 28-10 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Purdue | -13.5 | W | 52-38 | OV | 53 | -4.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Maryland | -2.5 | W | 54-3 | OV | 55.5 | 0 | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oregon | 10 | W | 17-15 | UN | 58 | 3.5 | W | 3-6 | UN | 13.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-6 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Wisconsin | -1 | W | 17-7 | UN | 43 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0 | W | 10-0 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | Michigan State | -16.5 | W | 28-10 | UN | 44 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | Nevada | -22.5 | W | 27-0 | UN | 43 | -5.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | -13 | W | 17-0 | UN | 23 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | USC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Minnesota U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:5-3 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:3-4-1 |
| 09-03-26 | Eastern Illinois | -42.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 52.5 | 0 | W | 14-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 35-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Mississippi St | 1 | L | 13-38 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | L | 6-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Akron | -22.5 | W | 41-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Washington U | 12 | W | 27-24 | OV | 45 | 2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 23 |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan | 6.5 | W | 20-14 | UN | 42 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 7-14 | P | 21 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Purdue | -2.5 | L | 13-41 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Iowa | 7.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 41 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 4.5 | W | 3-3 | UN | 20.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Indiana | 20.5 | W | 16-23 | UN | 40 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 7.5 | 10.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 20.5 |
| 11-07-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Marshall | 24 | 54.5 | 42.5 | | 41 | 46 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 1-3 / 2-2 | 1-3 / 3-1 | +1 / -13.5 | -10 / +7.5 |
| Georgia Southern | 30 | -7 | 35(1) | -8.5 | 38 | 38 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 4-0 / 3-1 | 1-3 / 2-2 | +7.5 / -1 | -2.5 / +4.5 |
Georgia Southern has won each of the last two meetings, including a 24-19 road win at Marshall last season. The Eagles generated 528 total yards and 31 first downs in that contest, but only scored 24 points. Both teams are bringing two-game winning streaks into this contest. Marshall handled business against South Alabama and Old Dominion, while Georgia Southern took down the Monarchs and App State. The Eagles are one point away from being a perfect 8-0 against the spread this season (lost by four at Jacksonville State as a 3.5-point road 'dog. We respect what Georgia Southern has accomplished this season, but we'll be looking to back the Herd as a sizable ‘dog. Injuries originally forced Marshall to use multiple quarterbacks earlier this season, but head coach Tony Gibson had to like what he's seen from Carlos Del Rio-Wilson and Zion Turner. That duo split snaps in last week's win over Old Dominion, giving opposing defensive coordinators plenty to think about. We respect the run that Georgia Southern is on at the betting window, but it's not like the Eagles are blowing out the opposition. They covered the spread by 2.5 points vs Charleston Southern. They covered the spread by 4.5 points vs Clemson. They covered the spread by 3.5 points vs Houston. They covered the spread by 4.5 points vs Coastal Carolina. They covered the spread by 5.5 points vs Old Dominion. We're not talking about much room for error in these contests.
Play Marshall
| Marshall | 25.7 / 21 | +4.7 | 43 | 43 | -2 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Georgia Southern | 22 / 15 | +7 | 38 | 35 | -0.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Marshall | 10-31 | @ Old Domin. | -3 | 45.5 | 36-23 | Georgia Southern | 10-31 | Appalachi. | -6 | 55 | 19-3 |
| | 10-20 | South Ala. | +2 | 66.5 | 20-13 | | 10-15 | @ Old Domin. | -3 | 45 | 23-15 |
| | 10-10 | Coastal C. | -4.5 | 58 | 21-27 | | 10-10 | James Mad. | +7 | 51.5 | 24-27 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Georgia Southern | 24 | 62.5 | 31 | 45/176 | 26/39/0/355 | 2/1 |
| Marshall | 19 | -10.5 | 18 | 16/64 | 22/35/1/308 | 0/0 |
| Marshall |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Penn State | 23 | L | 0-45 | UN | 53.5 | 7 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Middle Tenn St | -11.5 | L | 28-26 | UN | 56 | -5.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | L | 14-13 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri State | -4 | W | 30-24 | OV | 52.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Gardner Webb | -25 | L | 36-35 | OV | 56 | | L | 10-14 | OV | | | W | 27-21 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ James Madison | 14.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 55.5 | 5.5 | W | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | 9 | L | 14-38 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Coastal Carolina | -4.5 | L | 21-27 | UN | 58 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | L | 0-13 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-20-26 | South Alabama | 2 | W | 20-13 | UN | 66.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 6-6 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Old Dominion | -3 | W | 36-23 | OV | 45.5 | -0.5 | W | 17-7 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 27-10 | OV | 22.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia Southern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:7-1 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:6-2 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:3-3-1 |
| 09-05-26 | Charleston Southern | -28.5 | W | 31-0 | UN | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 24-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Clemson | 19.5 | W | 7-22 | UN | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11 | W | 7-16 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 3.5 | L | 27-31 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 24-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Houston U | 17 | W | 28-42 | OV | 56.5 | 4.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 10 | L | 14-28 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | -2.5 | W | 31-24 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -1 | W | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | James Madison | 7 | W | 24-27 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 10-6 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-15-26 | @ Old Dominion | -3 | W | 23-15 | UN | 45 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 16-7 | P | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | Appalachian St | -6 | W | 19-3 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -3.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia State | 17 | 53.5 | 44.5 | | 46 | 42 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 3-1 | +22.8 / -8.3 | -10.5 / +7.5 |
| Appalachian St | 31 | -6.5 | 40(2) | -6.5 | 39 | 38 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 3-1 | 2-2 / 2-2 | +13.3 / -5 | -9 / +6.5 |
App State has won each of the last 12 meetings in this Sun Belt series. The Mountaineers have covered the spread in four of the last five meetings, including a 41-20 road win at Georgia State last week. We've successfully played against the Panthers each of the last three weeks, and we're not getting off that train this week. It's been a rinse-and-repeat formula for Georgia State. We don't want to take anything away from what the Panthers have accomplished thus far, because clearing your projected season win total by the first week of October is still something to celebrate, no matter who you are. But with all due respect to Georgia State, wins over North Carolina A&T, Kennesaw State, Northern Illinois and Old Dominion aren't moving the needle for us. Those four teams have a combined record of 8-26 this season. Over the last three weeks against James Madison, Arkansas State and Coastal Carolina, the Panthers have fallen short of point spread expectations by an average of 14.2 points per game. Throw in a 14-point loss to UCF earlier this season, and the Panthers haven't come close to beating a half-decent team this year. The final score of last week's 31-20 loss to Coastal Carolina looks respectable, but that was a 31-6 game in the third quarter before the Chanticleers put things on cruise control for the final minutes. Georgia State's defense forced three turnovers but the Panthers' offense couldn't do anything with the extra possessions.
Play App State
| Georgia State | 24.7 / 39.3 | -14.7 | 41 | 36 | +0.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Appalachian St | 24 / 27.3 | -3.3 | 38 | 35 | +6 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Georgia State | 10-31 | Coastal C. | -3.5 | 56 | 20-31 | Appalachian St | 10-31 | @ Georgia S. | +6 | 55 | 3-19 |
| | 10-24 | @ Arkansas . | -2.5 | 58.5 | 32-38 | | 10-22 | James Mad. | +11.5 | 57 | 34-31 |
| | 10-17 | @ James Mad. | +8 | 58 | 22-49 | | 10-16 | @ Coastal C. | PK | 48.5 | 35-32 |
|
| 10-11-25 | Appalachian St | 41 | -3 | 23 | 36/124 | 23/38/0/311 | 0/0 |
| Georgia State | 20 | 55.5 | 24 | 23/78 | 32/61/1/303 | 3/0 |
| Georgia State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-04-26 | N. Carolina A&T | -28.5 | W | 59-10 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kennesaw State | 7.5 | W | 31-17 | UN | 55.5 | 2.5 | W | 6-3 | UN | 12.5 | 4.5 | W | 21-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Florida | 17.5 | W | 30-44 | OV | 50.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 10.5 | 9.5 | W | 24-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | No Illinois | -8.5 | W | 35-14 | UN | 56.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Old Dominion | -1 | W | 42-10 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 28-3 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ James Madison | 8 | L | 22-49 | OV | 58 | 3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 6 | L | 10-35 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arkansas St | -2.5 | L | 32-38 | OV | 58.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Coastal Carolina | -3.5 | L | 20-31 | UN | 56 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -2.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Appalachian St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Maine | -21 | W | 55-3 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ East Carolina | 6.5 | W | 27-24 | UN | 55.5 | 3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13 | 4 | W | 17-10 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Charlotte | -16.5 | L | 26-21 | UN | 52.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -9.5 | L | 13-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | @ NC State | 13 | W | 31-41 | OV | 56 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | L | 10-28 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Old Dominion | -9 | L | 3-10 | UN | 46 | -2.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6 | L | 0-0 | UN | 23 |
| 10-16-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | 0 | W | 35-32 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 14-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-22-26 | James Madison | 11.5 | W | 34-31 | OV | 57 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | W | 10-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia Southern | 6 | L | 3-19 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan State | 13 | 39.5 | 26 | | 24 | 21 | 2-3 / 0-3 | 3-1-1 / 1-2 | 2-3 / 0-3 | +3.2 / -21 | -2.5 / +18 |
| Michigan | 31 | -14 | 17(3) | -12 | 13 | 29 | 4-2 / 1-1 | 2-3-1 / 0-2 | 1-5 / 1-1 | +6.3 / +0.5 | -10 / -11.5 |
Michigan has won each of the last four meetings, but the Spartans did stay within the number as a 13.5-point home 'dog last season. Four of the last five meetings have gone over the total, but we're not sure how many buyers you're going to find in that market this year. The Wolverines snapped a four-game "under' streak with a 28-21 road win at Rutgers last week. Tommy Carr looked much more comfortable against the Scarlet Knights than he did against Indiana the week prior, going 22-of-27 for 266 passing yards with three touchdowns and no interceptions. In his Monday press conference, Michigan head coach Kyle Whittingham announced that Carr will continue to serve as the starting QB ahead of Bryce Underwood for the foreseeable future. Michigan State is looking to snap a six-game losing skid. Six of the Spartans' last seven games have stayed under the total. During this six-game losing skid, the Spartans have scored an average of 15.7 points per game. First-year head coach Pat Fitzgerald is hopeful to get starting QB Alessio Milivojevic back from injury this week because the green-and-white offense has gone cold without him. Michigan State scored ten points with 156 total yards and 11 first downs last week at UCLA. It's a big number to lay for a Michigan team that hasn't shown any kind of explosiveness on offense this season, but we can only look in the Wolverines' direction. Some of Michigan State's "close" losses this season should not have been as close as they were. Sparty was able to cover the spread against Notre Dame with only 167 total yards and 11 first downs. Michigan State trailed the Illini by two touchdowns in the fourth quarter before Illinois' starting QB got hurt. Northwestern out-gained Michigan State by 55 yards and held a 23-15 advantage in first downs, but only won by three. Sparty is ripe for another blow-out loss, and the maize-and-blue will look to deliver it if the opportunity is there.
Play Michigan
11/02 12:37 PM PST — In his Monday press conference, Michigan head coach Kyle Whittingham announced that Tommy Carr will continue to serve as the starting QB ahead of Bryce Underwood for the foreseeable future.
| Michigan State | 22.7 / 30 | -7.3 | 26 | 19 | +8.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Michigan | 18.3 / 17.3 | +1 | 15 | 18 | -5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Michigan State | 10-24 | @ UCLA | +16.5 | 44 | 10-28 | Michigan | 10-31 | @ Rutgers | -16.5 | 47 | 28-21 |
| | 10-17 | Northwest. | +7 | 50 | 21-24 | | 10-24 | Indiana | +7 | 43.5 | 6-13 |
| | 10-10 | Illinois | +2.5 | 48.5 | 37-38 | | 10-17 | Penn State | -6 | 43 | 21-18 |
|
| 10-25-25 | Michigan | 31 | -13.5 | 20 | 49/276 | 8/17/0/86 | 2/1 |
| Michigan State | 20 | 48 | 18 | 38/115 | 19/34/0/190 | 1/1 |
| Michigan State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-6 , PSR:4-3-1 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-3-1 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:3-5-0 |
| 09-04-26 | Toledo | -10 | PK | 30-20 | OV | 48.5 | -3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | -6.5 | W | 19-7 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Eastern Michigan | -17.5 | W | 35-7 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 26 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Notre Dame | 29 | W | 10-27 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 17.5 | W | 10-17 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Nebraska | 5.5 | L | 13-31 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3 | L | 10-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Wisconsin | 8.5 | L | 3-31 | UN | 43.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 6 | L | 3-17 | UN | 22 |
| 10-10-26 | Illinois | 2.5 | W | 37-38 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Northwestern | 7 | W | 21-24 | UN | 50 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | W | 14-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ UCLA | 16.5 | L | 10-28 | UN | 44 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 23 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Michigan |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:2-5-1 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1H SUR:6-2 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:2-5-1 |
| 09-05-26 | Western Michigan | -27.5 | L | 13-12 | UN | 50.5 | -7 | L | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -16.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Oklahoma | 5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 10-0 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UTEP | -34.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 48.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -20 | L | 17-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Iowa | -4.5 | L | 19-20 | UN | 40 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 7.5 | -2 | W | 10-7 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Minnesota U | -6.5 | L | 14-20 | UN | 42 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 14-7 | P | 21 |
| 10-17-26 | Penn State | -6 | L | 21-18 | UN | 43 | -1.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | Indiana | 7 | PK | 6-13 | UN | 43.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | 4 | L | 0-6 | UN | 21 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Rutgers | -16.5 | L | 28-21 | OV | 47 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | -9 | L | 14-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UCLA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas | 20 | -2.5 | 8 | -7 | 6 | 22 | 5-1 / 1-0 | 3-3 / 0-1 | 2-4 / 0-1 | +18.2 / +3 | -16 / -5 |
| Missouri | 17 | 44.5 | 17(2) | | 15 | 24 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 1-3 | +24.8 / +1.5 | -20.5 / -2 |
This will be the first meeting between the Tigers and Longhorns since both sides moved from the Big XII to the SEC. The last time Texas and Missouri shared a field was in a bowl game in 2017. Both teams are coming off nice wins last week. Texas has rebounded nicely from its losses with a pair of back-to-back wins over Ole Miss and Mississippi State. Missouri got back in the win column with a dominant road win at Arkansas last week. Five of the Tigers' last six games have stayed under the total. Missouri running back Ahmad Hardy made his return to the field six months after getting shot in the leg outside of a concert in Mississippi. Hardy only carried the ball twice in the win over Arkansas, but his presence provided a nice boost to the Tigers' confidence after falling by four touchdowns the week prior against Ole Miss. Why has Hardy's recovery been so complicated? On Friday, head coach Eli Drinkwitz announced that the bullet that struck Hardy has remained intact inside of his leg. Instead of removing it, doctors inserted a stabilizing rod to help Hardy regain his prior form. Texas wide receiver Cam Coleman continues to struggle with injuries, namely his shoulder. He's been unable to finish the Longhorns' last two games. After catching five passes for 110 yards and a touchdown against Oklahoma, Coleman has been limited to a total of six catches for 91 yards over Texas' last three games. He is listed as questionable once again on the Longhorns' early-week injury report. Missouri's offense didn't need to do much against the Razorbacks last week, but seven of their 34 points came off a fumble return for a touchdown.
Play the Under
11/02 12:38 PM PST — Texas wide receiver Cam Coleman continues to struggle with injuries, namely to his shoulder. He's been unable to finish the Longhorns' last two games and he is listed as questionable once again on the early-week injury report.
11/02 12:40 PM PST — Missouri running back Ahmad Hardy made his return to the field six months after getting shot in the leg. Hardy only carried the ball twice in last week's win over Arkansas, and it remains to be seen what kind of workload he will be able to handle over the next few weeks.
| Texas | 29.7 / 19 | +10.7 | 8 | 14 | -12 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 2-1 / 0-0 | 1-2 / 0-0 |
| Missouri | 21.3 / 15.7 | +5.7 | 15 | 15 | -3.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Texas | 10-31 | Mississip. | -19.5 | 50.5 | 31-3 | Missouri | 10-31 | @ Arkansas | -10.5 | 48.5 | 34-10 |
| | 10-24 | Mississip. | -3 | 55 | 34-27 | | 10-17 | @ Mississip. | +4 | 57 | 3-31 |
| | 10-17 | Florida | -13 | 51.5 | 24-27 | | 10-10 | Texas A&M | -4.5 | 50.5 | 27-6 |
| Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:2-5-1 | 1H SUR:7-1 , PSR:5-2-1 , O/U:3-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Texas State | -29.5 | W | 59-7 | OV | 61.5 | -7.5 | W | 14-0 | P | 14 | -17.5 | W | 28-7 | OV | 33 |
| 09-12-26 | Ohio State | -2 | L | 24-23 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tex San Antonio | -30 | L | 30-6 | UN | 58.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18 | L | 20-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tennessee U | -5 | L | 20-17 | UN | 54.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -3 | W | 10-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Oklahoma | -7.5 | L | 24-27 | OV | 41 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -4 | W | 17-7 | OV | 20 |
| 10-17-26 | Florida | -13 | L | 24-27 | UN | 51.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | PK | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Mississippi | -3 | W | 34-27 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | W | 24-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Mississippi St | -19.5 | W | 31-3 | UN | 50.5 | -4.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -11 | W | 17-0 | UN | 26.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Missouri |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Arkansas Pine Bluff | -55.5 | L | 54-14 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 40-0 | OV | |
| 09-11-26 | @ Kansas | -4.5 | W | 38-21 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | L | 14-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Troy | -26.5 | L | 27-17 | UN | 49.5 | -7 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -15 | L | 24-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Mississippi St | 3.5 | L | 24-31 | UN | 58.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Florida | 5.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 58 | 0.5 | W | 3-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | W | 20-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Texas A&M | -4.5 | W | 27-6 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 10-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Mississippi | 4 | L | 3-31 | UN | 57 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | L | 3-21 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Arkansas | -10.5 | W | 34-10 | UN | 48.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 13-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Old Dominion | 19 | 44 | 46.5 | | 42 | 43 | 1-4 / 1-3 | 0-5 / 1-3 | 2-3 / 2-2 | -5.8 / -18.5 | -6 / +10.5 |
| Coastal Carolina | 31 | -6.5 | 41(1) | -6.5 | 42 | 42 | 1-3 / 2-2 | 1-3 / 3-1 | 3-1 / 1-3 | +2.8 / +0.5 | -8 / +8.5 |
The home team has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings in this Sun Belt series. Coastal Carolina earned a 45-37 home win in 2024 and the Monarchs returned the favor with a dominant 47-7 home win last season. Each of the last four meetings have gone over the total. Old Dominion out-gained Coastal 619-189 last year, but we haven't seen production like that from the Monarchs' offense in quite some time. Old Dominion still hasn't had its bye week (coming up next), so this is the Monarchs' tenth-straight week with a game. ODU is 1-7 straight-up and against the spread vs FBS-level opposition this season. The lone win came against App State as Boone was dealing with the remnants of Hurricane Isaias. This will be Coastal Carolina's first game favored over an FBS-level opponent, and normally we don't love the idea of laying points with a team like that. But given all of the intangibles in this matchup, we can only look in the Chanticleers' direction. We already mentioned the fatigue factor. Then add in the revenge factor. Then add in the fact that Coastal probably could have beaten Georgia State by 30 last week if the Chanticleers really wanted to. All of a sudden, laying a touchdown with Coastal doesn't sound like such a troubling proposition.
Play Coastal Carolina
| Old Dominion | 12.7 / 28.3 | -15.7 | 44 | 39 | +6.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Coastal Carolina | 30 / 25.3 | +4.7 | 42 | 41 | +2.5 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Old Dominion | 10-31 | Marshall | +3 | 45.5 | 23-36 | Coastal Carolina | 10-31 | @ Georgia S. | +3.5 | 56 | 31-20 |
| | 10-24 | @ Louisiana. | +13.5 | 44 | 0-26 | | 10-16 | Appalachi. | PK | 48.5 | 32-35 |
| | 10-15 | Georgia S. | +3 | 45 | 15-23 | | 10-10 | @ Marshall | +4.5 | 58 | 27-21 |
|
| 10-04-25 | Coastal Carolina | 7 | 53.5 | 12 | 37/81 | 19/30/1/108 | 1/1 |
| Old Dominion | 47 | -18.5 | 30 | 43/302 | 18/34/0/317 | 1/1 |
| Old Dominion |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-7 , PSR:1-8 , O/U:4-5-0 | 1Q SUR:1-6 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1H SUR:2-6 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:5-2-1 |
| 09-05-26 | Norfolk St | -41.5 | L | 31-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 18 | L | 21-44 | OV | 47.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | L | 6-34 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | East Carolina | -2.5 | L | 17-20 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 17-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | James Madison | 7 | L | 20-46 | OV | 44 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 9.5 | 4 | L | 17-30 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia State | 1 | L | 10-42 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Appalachian St | 9 | W | 10-3 | UN | 46 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6 | W | 0-0 | UN | 23 |
| 10-15-26 | Georgia Southern | 3 | L | 15-23 | UN | 45 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 7-16 | P | 23 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | 13.5 | L | 0-26 | UN | 44 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 0-17 | UN | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | Marshall | 3 | L | 23-36 | OV | 45.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-27 | OV | 22.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Coastal Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ West Virginia | 21 | W | 24-31 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Fordham | -36.5 | W | 45-7 | UN | 54 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Delaware | 4.5 | L | 14-22 | UN | 56.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | W | 14-15 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-24-26 | Liberty | 2.5 | L | 17-34 | OV | 50 | 0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | W | 17-10 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Georgia Southern | 2.5 | L | 24-31 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 1 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Marshall | 4.5 | W | 27-21 | UN | 58 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | W | 13-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-16-26 | Appalachian St | 0 | L | 32-35 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 24-14 | OV | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia State | 3.5 | W | 31-20 | UN | 56 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 2.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | Old Dominion | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ James Madison | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Clemson | 23 | 0 | 20.5 | -1.5 | 18 | 19 | 3-2 / 2-1 | 1-4 / 2-1 | 2-3 / 2-1 | +5.6 / -5 | -10.5 / +4 |
| Syracuse | 28 | 50 | 24(2) | | 28 | 15 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 3-1 | +13.8 / -3.8 | -4.5 / +6.5 |
Clemson was on a six-game winning streak in this ACC series before Syracuse earned a 34-21 road win as a 17.5-point 'dog last season. That was the coming-out party for Orange QB Steve Angeli, who's had an up-and-down career across his time with Notre Dame and Syracuse. Angeli threw for 245 yards with two touchdowns and no interceptions in that contest against the Tigers last season, and he's got the hot hand at the moment after leading back-to-back outright upset wins over North Carolina and SMU. After playing QB roulette earlier this season, the Orange have covered the spread in four-straight games and still have their sights set on a potential bowl berth. Angeli went 21-of-34 for 200 yards with two touchdowns and no interceptions in last week's upset of the Mustangs. Clemson is coming off an upset win of its own against Florida State, but we're not ready to buy into any kind of resurgence. The Tigers were the beneficiary of four Florida State turnovers last week, yet that was a 29-24 contest with four minutes remaining before Tait Reynolds escaped for a 79-yard insurance touchdown. Clemson running back Gideon Davidson is not expected to play this week after suffering an ankle injury in last week's win over Florida State. Davidson is averaging 5.0 yards per carry with five touchdowns this season. With Angeli now back at full strength, the Orange look poised to make a second-half run.
Play Syracuse
11/03 11:03 AM PST — Clemson running back Gideon Davidson is not expected to play this week after suffering an ankle injury in last week's win over Florida State. Davidson is averaging 5.0 yards per carry with five touchdowns this season.
| Clemson | 29.7 / 14.7 | +15 | 20 | 31 | -13.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Syracuse | 29 / 30.3 | -1.3 | 30 | 17 | +10 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Clemson | 10-31 | @ Florida S. | +5 | 50.5 | 36-24 | Syracuse | 10-31 | SMU | +8 | 58.5 | 30-27 |
| | 10-24 | Virginia . | -2.5 | 50 | 16-20 | | 10-24 | @ North Car. | +8 | 49.5 | 31-30 |
| | 10-17 | Charlesto. | -42.5 | 53 | 37-0 | | 10-17 | Louisville | +14.5 | 57 | 26-34 |
|
| 09-20-25 | Syracuse | 34 | 53.5 | 24 | 38/155 | 21/39/0/278 | 0/0 |
| Clemson | 21 | -17.5 | 29 | 22/140 | 37/61/1/363 | 1/1 |
| Clemson |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ LSU | 10 | L | 10-51 | OV | 49 | 3 | L | 3-17 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-31 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia Southern | -19.5 | L | 22-7 | UN | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11 | L | 16-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | North Carolina | -3 | W | 28-20 | OV | 44.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 7.5 | -1.5 | L | 6-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ California | -2.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 52 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Miami Florida | 14 | L | 13-41 | OV | 49 | 3.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Charleston Southern | -42.5 | L | 37-0 | UN | 53 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 10-24-26 | Virginia Tech | -2.5 | L | 16-20 | UN | 50 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Florida State | 5 | W | 36-24 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 23-10 | OV | 25.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Syracuse |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | New Hampshire | -35.5 | W | 66-3 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 41-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | California | -4 | L | 18-21 | UN | 57 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -2.5 | W | 12-7 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-17-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 10.5 | L | 13-27 | UN | 51 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Connecticut | -6.5 | L | 42-41 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-7 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 27-14 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Virginia | 14 | W | 25-28 | OV | 49 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | W | 17-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Louisville | 14.5 | W | 26-34 | OV | 57 | 3.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | W | 23-28 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ North Carolina | 8 | W | 31-30 | OV | 49.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | 5.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | SMU | 8 | W | 30-27 | UN | 58.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | 6 | W | 20-10 | UN | 30.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisville | 45 | -14.5 | 15.5 | -11.5 | 15 | 32 | 4-1 / 1-1 | 4-1 / 0-2 | 4-1 / 2-0 | +21 / +2.5 | -16 / -10 |
| Georgia Tech | 20 | 62.5 | 29(2) | | 25 | 26 | 2-3 / 0-3 | 1-4 / 0-3 | 3-2 / 2-1 | -1.6 / -13.3 | -7 / +5 |
Louisville has won each of the last two meetings, although the Cardinals and Yellow Jackets did not play last season. Louisville hits the road after taking care of business against Stanford last week. The Cardinals should be well-rested for a November push. After a bye week, Louisville out-gained Stanford by nearly 200 yards with a +3.7 yards per play differential. The Cardinals only had to punt twice and Isaac Brown only needed nine carries to generate 139 rushing yards and three touchdowns. Georgia Tech may be looking to make a switch at quarterback this week. Sophomore Grady Adamson has seen an uptick in first-team practice reps, potentially replacing Indiana transfer Alberto Mendoza. Adamson has seen playing time in each of the Yellow Jackets' last two games, going 13-of-26 for 135 yards against Boston College and Pitt. He did rush for 63 yards on just six carries last week against the Panthers. Georgia Tech is 2-6 straight-up, 1-7 against the spread this season. In those two losses to Boston College and Pitt, the Jackets fell short of point spread expectations by 28.5 and 15.5 points. With all due respect to Adamson, if he was looking considerably better than Mendoza in practice, head coach Brent Key probably would have made this move several weeks ago.
Play Louisville
| Louisville | 43.3 / 23.3 | +20 | 16 | 27 | -13.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Georgia Tech | 20.7 / 39 | -18.3 | 26 | 26 | +4 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Louisville | 10-31 | Stanford | -22.5 | 59 | 52-24 | Georgia Tech | 10-31 | @ Pittsburg. | +9.5 | 54.5 | 11-34 |
| | 10-17 | @ Syracuse | -14.5 | 57 | 34-26 | | 10-24 | Boston Co. | -6.5 | 50 | 27-49 |
| | 10-09 | Florida S. | -4 | 61 | 44-20 | | 10-17 | @ Virginia . | +9 | 55 | 24-34 |
| Louisville |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:7-1-0 | 1Q SUR:6-2 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:1-6-1 , O/U:5-3-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Mississippi | 6.5 | W | 38-41 | OV | 54.5 | 3 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | 4 | PK | 6-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Villanova | -39 | W | 59-13 | OV | 56.5 | 0 | W | 17-3 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-10 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | SMU | -3 | W | 41-31 | OV | 57.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Wake Forest | -11 | L | 27-30 | UN | 57.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 21-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ NC State | -5 | L | 28-31 | OV | 56.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | L | 7-13 | UN | 28 |
| 10-09-26 | Florida State | -4 | W | 44-20 | OV | 61 | -0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | -2.5 | L | 14-14 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Syracuse | -14.5 | L | 34-26 | OV | 57 | -3.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | L | 28-23 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Stanford | -22.5 | W | 52-24 | OV | 59 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -13.5 | L | 24-17 | OV | 31 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Pittsburgh U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-6 , PSR:1-7 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Colorado | -6.5 | L | 13-14 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Tennessee U | 12.5 | L | 24-45 | OV | 55.5 | 3.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 13 | 6.5 | L | 10-24 | OV | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Mercer | -38.5 | L | 44-11 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 24-3 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Stanford | -3 | L | 27-34 | OV | 48 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 20-10 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | Duke | 4.5 | W | 28-25 | OV | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 14-10 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Virginia Tech | 9 | L | 24-34 | OV | 55 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 6 | L | 3-24 | UN | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | Boston College | -6.5 | L | 27-49 | OV | 50 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 13-12 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Pittsburgh U | 9.5 | L | 11-34 | UN | 54.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 27.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Duke | 31 | -4.5 | 18 | -6 | 20 | 29 | 4-1 / 2-1 | 4-1 / 2-1 | 1-3 / 2-1 | +27.6 / +1.3 | -14.5 / +1.5 |
| NC State | 20 | 54 | 26(2) | | 23 | 28 | 4-1 / 0-3 | 3-2 / 0-3 | 3-2 / 2-1 | +16.6 / -11 | -9.5 / -0 |
Duke is 5-1 straight-up and against the spread over the last six meetings. The Blue Devils earned a 45-33 win as a short home favorite last season. That high-scoring result broke a string of three-straight "under" results between the Blue Devils and Wolfpack. NC State is coming off a 21-10 home win over Cal last week in a game that confused the betting market (us included). All week heading into that contest, the stories out of Raleigh were pretty grim. By most accounts, the Wolfpack players didn't want to see Dave Doeren get fired and there were some loud whispers that QB CJ Bailey could potentially miss last week's game against Cal. Bailey was there, and he brought plenty of motivated friends with him as NC State whipped the Golden Bears. That didn't feel like a one-week post-firing bump, but NC State now has some distractions to deal with. Russell Wilson and Philip Rivers have already publicly expressed interest in the job. If you're an NC State underclassmen and you have the potential to play for a potential NFL Hall of Famer next year, our eyes and ears would be wandering, too. Duke just beat Boston College by 45, so the Blue Devils are not the type of team you want to see if you're not fully focused. Duke has enjoyed plenty of recent success in this matchup, and we expect that to be the case again on Saturday.
Play Duke
| Duke | 28.7 / 14 | +14.7 | 21 | 25 | -2.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| NC State | 24.3 / 26.3 | -2 | 23 | 26 | -4.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Duke | 10-31 | Boston Co. | -7 | 49 | 47-2 | NC State | 10-31 | California | -9.5 | 56.5 | 31-10 |
| | 10-23 | @ Virginia | +2.5 | 47 | 19-16 | | 10-23 | @ Stanford | -7.5 | 55 | 28-31 |
| | 10-17 | North Car. | -3 | 47 | 20-24 | | 10-10 | Wake Fore. | +3.5 | 56 | 14-38 |
|
| 09-20-25 | NC State | 33 | 56.5 | 26 | 35/171 | 29/39/3/364 | 2/1 |
| Duke | 45 | -3 | 22 | 35/149 | 19/28/0/269 | 1/0 |
| 11-09-24 | Duke | 29 | 52 | 16 | 24/37 | 22/31/0/245 | 1/1 |
| NC State | 19 | -3 | 19 | 29/84 | 16/39/1/184 | 1/1 |
| Duke |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:3-4-1 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tulane | -9.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 51.5 | -3 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Illinois | 6 | W | 31-27 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Stanford | -10 | W | 35-7 | UN | 51.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | William & Mary | -42.5 | W | 62-7 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 38-7 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | @ Georgia Tech | -4.5 | L | 25-28 | OV | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 10-14 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-17-26 | North Carolina | -3 | L | 20-24 | UN | 47 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Virginia | 2.5 | W | 19-16 | UN | 47 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Boston College | -7 | W | 47-2 | P | 49 | -0.5 | W | 13-2 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | W | 27-2 | OV | 24 |
| 11-07-26 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| NC State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:5-2-1 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:3-5-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Virginia | 4 | L | 8-34 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | 2.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-11-26 | Richmond | -33.5 | W | 73-0 | OV | 50.5 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 49-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 3 | L | 31-35 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Appalachian St | -13 | L | 41-31 | OV | 56 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | W | 28-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Louisville | 5 | W | 31-28 | OV | 56.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | W | 13-7 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | Wake Forest | 3.5 | L | 14-38 | UN | 56 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | W | 14-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Stanford | -7.5 | L | 28-31 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 12.5 | -4.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | California | -9.5 | W | 31-10 | UN | 56.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa | 24 | -3 | 15.5 | -2.5 | 17 | 18 | 4-1 / 2-1 | 3-2 / 2-1 | 1-4 / 1-2 | +22.2 / +5 | -14 / 0 |
| Northwestern | 20 | 42.5 | 20(2) | | 20 | 11 | 5-0 / 1-2 | 4-1 / 1-2 | 2-1 / 2-1 | +26 / -3.7 | -13 / +5.5 |
Iowa has won each of the last four meetings, with the last one being a 40-14 home win over the Wildcats in 2024. The Hawkeyes are normally one of the most-stable programs in the country, but Iowa has developed some Jekyll and Hyde tendencies over the last few weeks. One week after fumbling four times against Minnesota, the Hawkeyes beat Wisconsin 30-0 in one of the most dominant performances of the season. That defense will need another strong performance this week against a Wildcat offense that has been lighting the scoreboard. Northwestern saw its four-game winning streak come to a close last week at Oregon, but nonetheless, the Purple 'Cats still generated 456 total yards and 22 first downs on 6.2 yards per play against the Ducks. We're going to hope that last week's result against the Badgers helped settle the Hawkeyes' randomness down a little bit as we look to back Iowa in this matchup. Northwestern's bye was in the second week of the season, so this will be the Cats' eighth-straight week with a game while traveling back from Eugene. Iowa fans love to make the trek to Evanston and the Hawkeyes should be well-represented at New Ryan Field.
Play Iowa
| Iowa | 27 / 12.3 | +14.7 | 17 | 19 | -2.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Northwestern | 30.7 / 23 | +7.7 | 18 | 21 | -6 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Iowa | 10-31 | Wisconsin | -2.5 | 36 | 30-0 | Northwestern | 10-31 | @ Oregon | +3.5 | 47.5 | 26-34 |
| | 10-24 | @ Minnesota. | -7.5 | 41 | 10-13 | | 10-24 | Rutgers | -15 | 58.5 | 42-14 |
| | 10-09 | @ Washingto. | +3 | 41.5 | 41-24 | | 10-17 | @ Michigan . | -7 | 50 | 24-21 |
| Iowa |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | No Illinois | -31 | W | 40-0 | UN | 44.5 | -7.5 | W | 20-0 | OV | 10 | -18.5 | W | 33-0 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Iowa State | -14 | L | 16-13 | UN | 42.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Northern Iowa | -37.5 | W | 55-0 | OV | 48.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Michigan | 4.5 | W | 20-19 | UN | 40 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 7.5 | 2 | L | 7-10 | UN | 19.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Ohio State | 14.5 | L | 14-31 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-10 | OV | 7.5 | 7.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ Washington U | 3 | W | 41-24 | OV | 41.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-0 | OV | 7.5 | 1.5 | W | 27-3 | OV | 20 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Minnesota U | -7.5 | L | 10-13 | UN | 41 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -4.5 | L | 3-3 | UN | 20.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Wisconsin | -2.5 | W | 30-0 | UN | 36 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 7.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-0 | OV | 17.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Northwestern |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:4-2-2 | 1Q SUR:6-2 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | South Dakota St | -14 | W | 34-18 | OV | 49.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 10-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Colorado | -3.5 | W | 41-7 | P | 48 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 21-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Indiana | 20.5 | W | 23-29 | OV | 49.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-2 | UN | 10.5 | 11.5 | L | 0-12 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Penn State | 3 | W | 34-13 | P | 47 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 23 |
| 10-10-26 | Ball State | -34.5 | L | 45-14 | OV | 53.5 | -9.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 31-14 | OV | 30 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan State | -7 | L | 24-21 | UN | 50 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | -4 | L | 10-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Rutgers | -15 | W | 42-14 | UN | 58.5 | -4.5 | W | 21-3 | OV | 13.5 | -9.5 | W | 28-6 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oregon | 3.5 | L | 26-34 | OV | 47.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 20-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oklahoma State | 38 | -7 | 16 | -10 | 21 | 27 | 4-0 / 1-3 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 3-1 | +28.5 / -0.5 | -13.5 / -4 |
| Kansas State | 26 | 64.5 | 28(2) | | 20 | 30 | 4-1 / 0-3 | 3-2 / 0-2-1 | 3-2 / 2-1 | +19.6 / -6.3 | -17 / -1.5 |
So far this move back to the alma mater hasn’t worked out so well for Collin Klein, as his Kansas State was down to its fourth QB last week at Boulder before becoming the first Big XII side to lose a game to Deion Sanders’ Colorado in over a year. Moreover, the Texas A&M offense that Klein coordinated last season hasn’t worked nearly as well with QB Marcel Reed as it did a year ago with Klein...so far, not so good for either side after his move last winter. Now with word from Manhattan that starter Avery Johnson is likely done for the season with neck/shoulder issues, backup Jacob Knuth nursing a bad ankle, and sophomore Dillon Duff ineffective last week vs. the Buffaloes, Klein is apparently doing the Baltimore Ravens one better and ready to start his fourth different QB in as many weeks after junior Blake Barnett provided a spark off the bench at Folsom Field and passed for three TDs in a losing effort. That flash of production aside, going this far down the depth chart at QB hardly seems a proper recipe to outscore a potent Oklahoma State and its prolific pilot QB Drew Mestemaker, now regarded as perhaps the top signal-caller in next April’s NFL draft, though the Cowboys have had to readjust their sites to the Texas or Alamo Bowls after losing a shootout last week in Ames to drop to 5-3. Still, if Oklahoma State is looking to take out some frustrations, this might be a bad week to start a fourth-string QB against the Cowboys, as the Eric Morris strike force that was imported almost lock, stock and barrel from North Texas still ranks 3rd nationally in scoring (41.1 ppg) and total offense (529.6 ypg), while Mestemaker (2,649 passing yards) ranks behind only Oregon State gunslinger Braden Atkinson in passing yardage nationally and is tied for the lead with Atkinson and Memphis’ Marcus Stokes on TD passes at 25. The question for Klein is if there are enough holes in the Oklahoma State defense (which ranks 103rd nationally) for Barnett or whatever volunteer from the student body is at QB to take advantage. If starter Johnson were available, maybe so, but that looks a big ask from the current makeup of a Wildcat team that let the struggling Coach Prime into the conference win column last week.
Play Oklahoma State
11/03 11:52 AM PST — Last Saturday at Colorado, K-State was down to its fourth QB, though junior Blake Barnett did provide a spark off of the bench when tossing three TD passes vs. the Buffaloes. It was still a losing effort in OT at Boulder, however, and now Wildcats HC Collin Klein is looking at starting a fourth different QB in as many weeks with starter Avery Johnson (neck/shoulder; now likely done for season), backup Jacob Knuth (ankle), and sophomore Dillon Duff (ineffective at Colorado before getting pulled) not likely in the picture for this Saturday's visit from the Cowboys.
| Oklahoma State | 46 / 36.7 | +9.3 | 21 | 24 | -6.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Kansas State | 25.3 / 26.3 | -1 | 20 | 26 | -0.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Oklahoma State | 10-31 | @ Iowa State | -10 | 58 | 49-51 | Kansas State | 10-31 | @ Colorado | +3 | 47 | 24-27 |
| | 10-24 | Colorado | -13 | 55.5 | 57-24 | | 10-24 | @ Arizona S. | -1 | 51.5 | 17-28 |
| | 10-17 | @ Houston U | +4 | 62 | 32-35 | | 10-17 | Kansas | -3 | 55 | 35-24 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Kansas State | 14 | -20 | 14 | 30/107 | 15/28/1/177 | 0/0 |
| Oklahoma State | 6 | 50.5 | 23 | 29/147 | 25/38/3/226 | 2/2 |
| Oklahoma State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:2-6 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Tulsa | -12.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 57.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 3-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Oregon | 24 | W | 39-31 | OV | 55.5 | 6.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | W | 24-17 | OV | 30 |
| 09-19-26 | Murray State | -55.5 | W | 59-0 | UN | 70 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ West Virginia | 2 | W | 41-24 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13 | 0.5 | L | 13-14 | UN | 31 |
| 10-10-26 | Central Florida | -10 | W | 42-28 | OV | 53.5 | -2.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 21-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Houston U | 4 | W | 32-35 | OV | 62 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 31.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Colorado | -13 | W | 57-24 | OV | 55.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | L | 23-24 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Iowa State | -10 | L | 49-51 | OV | 58 | -2.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 12.5 | -6.5 | L | 21-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kansas State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:2-4-1 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Nicholls State | -41.5 | W | 71-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 22-0 | OV | | | W | 36-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Washington State | -17.5 | W | 34-7 | UN | 48.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10 | -10 | PK | 17-7 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Tulane | -20.5 | L | 31-20 | OV | 50 | -5.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Cincinnati U | -6 | L | 26-31 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 12.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Houston U | -2.5 | L | 16-35 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-21 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Kansas | -3 | W | 35-24 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 13.5 | -1.5 | L | 18-17 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona State | -1 | L | 17-28 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 10-14 | UN | 26 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Colorado | 3 | PK | 24-27 | OV | 47 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 23 |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Cincinnati U | 23 | 61 | 25.5 | | 26 | 13 | 5-1 / 0-2 | 4-2 / 0-2 | 5-1 / 1-1 | +11.5 / -15 | -5.5 / +4.5 |
| Houston U | 40 | -10 | 16.5(2) | -11 | 17 | 12 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 1-2-1 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 2-2 | +24.3 / +5.8 | -22 / -0 |
That hissing sound you might be hearing in distance could be the air escaping from Cincinnati’s balloon after the Bearcats deflated a week ago at home vs. Utah following the shocker vs. Texas Tech the previous week at Nippert Stadium. The Hindenburg hardly went down more quickly than Cincinnati did in the first half last Saturday vs. the Utes, who used a pair of defensive TDs in the second quarter to turn the game into a rout before halftime when Morgan Scalley’s team had a 42-6 (42-6!) cushion. What concerns Oscar Robertson, Travis Kelce, Taylor Swift and other Bearcat alums and friends, however, is the recent late-season pattern under head coach Scott Satterfield - lose, lose and lose some more. Over the last two seasons (with bowls included), Cincinnati has closed each year on an 0-5 ATS run for a combined run of 0-10 down the stretch. And if adding in 2023, Satterfield’s first season at Nippert, the last-five-games-mark over the past three seasons is only 1-14. Stretch-runners, the Bearcats ain’t. Meanwhile, Willie Fritz has had his Cougars get a needed bye week after blowing a late lead at the same Utah, perhaps kicking away a legit chance to make the Big XII title game and the playoffs in the process. Though as long as both are still technically possible, Houston will likely keep swinging, with QB Conner Weigman a longshot candidate to at least get invited to the Heisman ceremony after posting some gaudy stats this season that include 20 TD passes and only two picks, plus another six TDs on the ground, while Frtiz’s old charge from his Tulane days, RB Makhi Hughes (516 rushing yards), leads a jarring infantry that is providing nice balance for Weigman. The real attraction here, however, is the chance to possibly pick up on the annual late-season Cincy fade while still time to take advantage.
Play Houston
| Cincinnati U | 34.7 / 39.3 | -4.7 | 26 | 17 | +6.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Houston U | 27.7 / 23 | +4.7 | 17 | 17 | +1.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Cincinnati U | 10-31 | Utah | +7 | 56.5 | 25-49 | Houston U | 10-24 | @ Utah | +6 | 57.5 | 13-21 |
| | 10-24 | Texas Tech | +11 | 58 | 37-24 | | 10-17 | Oklahoma . | -4 | 62 | 35-32 |
| | 10-17 | @ West Virg. | +1.5 | 64.5 | 42-45 | | 10-10 | @ Kansas St. | +2.5 | 55 | 35-16 |
| Cincinnati U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-4-1 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Boston College | -7 | W | 34-15 | UN | 51.5 | -3 | PK | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 10-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Carolina | -36.5 | W | 62-10 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 28-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Miami Ohio | -14.5 | L | 35-31 | OV | 51 | -3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10 | -7.5 | L | 7-28 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Kansas State | 6 | W | 31-26 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 3.5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona U | 7 | L | 7-34 | UN | 56.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ West Virginia | 1.5 | L | 42-45 | OV | 64.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | 0 | W | 21-14 | OV | 31.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Texas Tech | 11 | W | 37-24 | OV | 58 | 3.5 | W | 3-6 | UN | 13.5 | 7 | W | 24-6 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Utah | 7 | L | 25-49 | OV | 56.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | 4 | L | 6-42 | OV | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Houston U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:7-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Oregon State | -21 | L | 33-20 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 9-7 | OV | 10.5 | -12.5 | L | 19-7 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern | -52 | W | 77-6 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 49-0 | OV | |
| 09-18-26 | @ Texas Tech | 8 | W | 26-28 | OV | 52.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 17-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia Southern | -17 | L | 42-28 | OV | 56.5 | -4.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -10 | W | 28-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Central Florida | -10 | PK | 27-17 | UN | 50 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Kansas State | 2.5 | W | 35-16 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | 0.5 | W | 21-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Oklahoma State | -4 | L | 35-32 | OV | 62 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Utah | 6 | L | 13-21 | UN | 57.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 4 | W | 3-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rutgers | 13 | 45 | 29 | | 29 | 16 | 1-4 / 1-2 | 3-2 / 1-2 | 5-0 / 1-2 | -2.2 / -9.3 | -2 / +8 |
| Wisconsin | 38 | -18.5 | 19.5(3) | -12.5 | 19 | 18 | 4-0 / 1-2 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 0-2 | +29 / -12 | -18.5 / +4.5 |
Wisconsin has won all six meetings since the Scarlet Knights joined the Big Ten, with the last one being a 42-7 road win at Rutgers in 2024. The Badgers are licking their wounds after suffering a 30-0 loss at Iowa last week, and Luke Fickell's seat has gotten warm once again. The embattled coach has an interesting stretch of games on the horizon. Wisconsin has a VERY comfortable schedule down the stretch with this game against Rutgers followed by dates with Maryland and Purdue. With that schedule of games, Fickell should be able to lead the Badgers toward a respectable bowl game and Wisconsin could even finish with a 10-win season depending on how the postseason shakes out. Now comes the glass-half-empty view at that schedule. If Wisconsin were to lose one of these upcoming games (where they should be favored through the end of the regular season), then things get dicey. Rutgers' starting QB Dylan Lonergan is listed as questionable on the Knights' early-week injury report, but reports out of Piscataway suggest he may be forced to miss the rest of the regular season similar to Oregon's Dante Moore. Lonergan suffered a head injury in the Week 8 loss to Northwestern and did not play last week against Michigan. Rutgers is 2-5 against the spread over its last seven road games.
| Rutgers | 24 / 33.3 | -9.3 | 29 | 20 | +12.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Wisconsin | 10.3 / 18 | -7.7 | 19 | 17 | +2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Rutgers | 10-31 | Michigan | +16.5 | 47 | 21-28 | Wisconsin | 10-31 | @ Iowa | +2.5 | 36 | 0-30 |
| | 10-24 | @ Northwest. | +15 | 58.5 | 14-42 | | 10-24 | USC | +2 | 50.5 | 24-7 |
| | 10-17 | @ Maryland | +5.5 | 56 | 37-30 | | 10-17 | @ UCLA | +1 | 43 | 7-17 |
| Rutgers |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-6 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:1-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1H SUR:1-7 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:6-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Massachusetts | -29.5 | L | 21-37 | OV | 55 | -7.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -17.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-11-26 | @ Boston College | 3 | L | 21-28 | UN | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | USC | 21 | W | 35-42 | OV | 58.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-10 | OV | 13.5 | 13.5 | W | 14-20 | OV | 31 |
| 09-25-26 | Howard | -42 | W | 58-7 | OV | 57 | | W | 21-7 | OV | | | W | 41-7 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | Indiana | 24.5 | L | 15-47 | OV | 56 | 6.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | L | 0-23 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Maryland | 5.5 | W | 37-30 | OV | 56 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 3 | L | 13-23 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Northwestern | 15 | L | 14-42 | UN | 58.5 | 4.5 | L | 3-21 | OV | 13.5 | 9.5 | L | 6-28 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Michigan | 16.5 | W | 21-28 | OV | 47 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | 9 | W | 13-14 | OV | 23.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Wisconsin |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:2-5-1 | 1Q SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-06-26 | @ Notre Dame | 21.5 | L | 13-41 | OV | 46 | 6.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 9.5 | 13.5 | W | 10-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Western Illinois | -43 | L | 36-9 | UN | 53 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 23-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Eastern Michigan | -23.5 | W | 54-10 | OV | 44 | -6.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Penn State | 9.5 | W | 24-20 | P | 44 | 2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 6 | L | 7-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Michigan State | -8.5 | W | 31-3 | UN | 43.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -6 | W | 17-3 | UN | 22 |
| 10-17-26 | @ UCLA | 1 | L | 7-17 | UN | 43 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | 0 | L | 0-10 | UN | 21 |
| 10-24-26 | USC | 2 | W | 24-7 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Iowa | 2.5 | L | 0-30 | UN | 36 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 7.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-20 | OV | 17.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Purdue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Iowa State | 31 | 51 | 25.5 | | 27 | 20 | 4-1 / 0-3 | 2-2-1 / 1-2 | 4-1 / 0-3 | +13.4 / -17.7 | -7.5 / +12.5 |
| Baylor | 34 | -10 | 21.5(2) | -6 | 21 | 26 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-0-1 | 1-3 / 2-1 | +14.3 / +22.3 | -17.5 / +0.5 |
One-week coach bump or just good timing? We have the same questions about Baylor's performance as we do NC State's. Were the Bears actually excited to play for a new coach last week, or did they catch a lucky break when UCF's starting quarterback went down? Baylor did appear to bring its A-game last week against the Knights, but nonetheless, they were catching UCF off an overtime upset against BYU the week prior, then lost starting QB Keyone Jenkins during the contest. Iowa State has won-and-covered each of the last two meetings, and that is the direction we're going to look in this one. The Cyclones are coming off a wild 51-49 upset win over Oklahoma State. Running back Aiden Flora finished with 221 rushing yards last week against the Cowboys. That was the third time in the last six games that Flora has produced over 200 rushing + receiving yards. Baylor's strength of schedule isn't holding up very well as the season progresses. The Bears haven't played any of the top teams in the Big XII: No Texas Tech, BYU, Houston, Arizona, Utah or Oklahoma State. That Week 1 loss to Auburn isn't aging very well considering the Tigers are 4-4 and just lost their last two games by a combined margin of 83-32.
Play Iowa State
| Iowa State | 21.3 / 37.3 | -16 | 26 | 18 | +11 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Baylor | 23.7 / 17 | +6.7 | 22 | 24 | -1.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-0-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Iowa State | 10-31 | Oklahoma . | +10 | 58 | 51-49 | Baylor | 10-30 | @ Central F. | -2.5 | 49.5 | 41-9 |
| | 10-24 | @ Arizona U | +12 | 51.5 | 3-39 | | 10-24 | @ Kansas | +1 | 54.5 | 24-25 |
| | 10-09 | @ BYU | +11.5 | 46.5 | 10-24 | | 10-17 | TCU | -3.5 | 50.5 | 6-17 |
| Iowa State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Missouri St | -29.5 | L | 38-10 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Iowa | 14 | W | 13-16 | UN | 42.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Bowling Green | -22.5 | W | 55-7 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | W | 35-7 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Utah | 7.5 | L | 17-31 | OV | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 4.5 | L | 3-24 | OV | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | West Virginia | -3 | PK | 45-42 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -1.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ BYU | 11.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 7 | L | 3-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Arizona U | 12 | L | 3-39 | UN | 51.5 | 2.5 | L | 3-15 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 3-25 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Oklahoma State | 10 | W | 51-49 | OV | 58 | 2.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 12.5 | 6.5 | W | 24-21 | OV | 29.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Baylor |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:5-2-1 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-1 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Auburn | 6.5 | W | 16-17 | UN | 58.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Prairie View A&M | -37.5 | W | 44-3 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 17-3 | OV | | | W | 34-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Louisiana Tech | -20.5 | L | 36-19 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -11.5 | W | 20-7 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Colorado | -8 | W | 23-13 | UN | 54.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6 | W | 10-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Arizona State | 3 | W | 55-19 | OV | 49.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | W | 24-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | TCU | -3.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 6-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kansas | 1 | PK | 24-25 | UN | 54.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | 7-7 | UN | 27 |
| 10-30-26 | @ Central Florida | -2.5 | W | 41-9 | OV | 49.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-6 | OV | 24 |
| 11-07-26 | Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas | 27 | 53.5 | 25 | | 23 | 16 | 2-3 / 1-2 | 2-3 / 1-2 | 1-4 / 1-2 | -2.8 / -16.7 | 0 / +11 |
| Auburn | 34 | -10.5 | 19.5(3) | -8.5 | 18 | 8 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 2-1 | +3.8 / -12.3 | -8 / +12 |
The road team has won-and-covered each of the last five editions of this SEC matchup. Arkansas earned a 24-14 upset win at Auburn in 2024 and the Tigers returned the favor last season with a 33-24 upset in Fayetteville. Both teams are coming off tough losses last week. The Tigers have dropped back-to-back games against LSU and Ole Miss and have been out-scored by a combined margin of 83-32 in the process. War Eagle is 1-5 against the spread over the last six games with the lone point spread cover coming in the upset win over Georgia three weeks ago. Arkansas probably hit the bye at the wrong time. In the two games before the week off, the Razorbacks easily covered the spread against Tennessee then crushed Vanderbilt as a 5.5-point 'dog the next week. Woo Pig Sooey lost all of its momentum during the bye and looked like a different team last week against Missouri. Auburn's last three games have all gone over the total, and that is the direction we want to look in this one. Arkansas' leading receiver Chris Marshall missed last week's loss to the Tigers, but he has a shot to return this week. The Razorbacks are one of the few teams in the SEC that will welcome a fast-paced affair with Auburn.
Play the Over
| Arkansas | 19.3 / 26.3 | -7 | 25 | 16 | +10 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Auburn | 19.7 / 35.7 | -16 | 17 | 7 | +12 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Arkansas | 10-31 | Missouri | +10.5 | 48.5 | 10-34 | Auburn | 10-31 | @ Mississip. | +10.5 | 58.5 | 15-45 |
| | 10-17 | @ Vanderbilt | +5.5 | 48.5 | 31-21 | | 10-24 | LSU | +7 | 52 | 17-38 |
| | 10-10 | Tennessee. | +13.5 | 51 | 17-24 | | 10-17 | @ Georgia | +19 | 50 | 27-24 |
|
| 10-25-25 | Auburn | 33 | 55.5 | 22 | 50/230 | 13/20/1/150 | 1/0 |
| Arkansas | 24 | -2.5 | 14 | 23/63 | 14/22/3/268 | 1/1 |
| Arkansas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | North Alabama | -40.5 | L | 31-14 | UN | 63.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Utah | 13.5 | L | 10-43 | UN | 55.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | L | 3-29 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia | 24.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 14 | L | 3-21 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Tulsa | -7 | W | 34-6 | UN | 51 | -2.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | W | 16-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Texas A&M | 13.5 | L | 7-34 | UN | 51 | 3.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 7-24 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Tennessee U | 13.5 | W | 17-24 | UN | 51 | 2.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | PK | 0-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 5.5 | W | 31-21 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 3 | W | 14-14 | OV | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | Missouri | 10.5 | L | 10-34 | UN | 48.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-13 | UN | 24.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Auburn |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Baylor | -6.5 | L | 17-16 | UN | 58.5 | -1.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | So Mississippi | -32 | W | 43-8 | UN | 56.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 27-8 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida | 2.5 | L | 39-44 | OV | 53.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Vanderbilt | -10 | L | 21-15 | UN | 54.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Tennessee U | 6 | L | 14-24 | UN | 54 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Georgia | 19 | W | 27-24 | OV | 50 | 4.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-24-26 | LSU | 7 | L | 17-38 | OV | 52 | 1.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | 4 | L | 10-31 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Mississippi | 10.5 | L | 15-45 | OV | 58.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 7 | W | 9-14 | UN | 30.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Samford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tech Play | | Updated: 11/03 8:08 pm |
| Colorado | 20 | 45.5 | 30 | | 27 | 21 | 2-2 / 1-3 | 1-2-1 / 1-3 | 3-1 / 1-2 | +2.3 / -19 | -3.5 / +8 |
| Arizona State | 29 | -3 | 23.5(2) | -8.5 | 24 | 15 | 3-1 / 0-3 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 2-2 / 3-0 | +14 / -21 | -16.5 / +16 |
Well, if Deion Sanders was to get one last hurrah with the Buffs, perhaps last Saturday was it, but we hope those folks at Aflac and Coach Prime fans everywhere realize it took overtime against a Kansas State team down to its fourth QB for Colorado to snap what was almost a 13-month Big XII losing streak. So, we’re hardly sure that was a late-season buy signal, or an indicator of a late run at bowl eligibility, for Sanders and friends. If there was a plus, it was that under-fire OC Brennan Marion went back to the roots of his “Go Go” offense that features a Lane Kiffin-like, uptempo ground game at its core, and CU did churn for 222 yards on ground vs. the Wildcats, the best such showing since September. The benefit was two-fold, as it also kept scatter-armed Utah transfer QB Isaac Wilson from winging the ball all across Folsom Field, instead limiting him to just 21 attempts–and no picks–after being an interception machine in the preceding three games when guilty of seven errant throws. The Buffs, however, were displaying too many flaws on both sides of the ball in recent weeks to trust, and while it might be too late to salvage anything other than a bid to the local Guaranteed Rate Bowl or maybe the Pop-Tarts Bowl, the host Sun Devils might have recently uncovered their keys to the future. Specifically, freshman QB Jake Fette, who has shown much promise since entering the lineup and came close to engineering a major upset last week at BYU when tossing a pair of TD passes, while a fellow frosh, RB Cardae Mack, has been doing his best Art and Benny Malone imitations in recent weeks, three times cracking the 120-yard barrier in the last four games with a high of 159 in the recent win at Tempe vs. Kansas State. True, Arizona State has laid a few eggs this season, but efforts have been encouraging the past two weeks for Kenny Dillingham. Besides, we’re just not interested pushing our luck with Coach Prime’s team on the road in Big XII play, where it has lost eight-straight dating to late 2024.
Play Arizona State
11/03 12:05 PM PST — With Fresno State (and elsewhere) transfer Mikey Keene sidelined by a leg injury, freshman QB Jake Fette got the start last Saturday at BYU and acquitted himself well, tossing a pair of TDs and no picks in the Sun Devils' narrow 27-20 loss in Provo. Fette had featured the week before off the bench vs. Kansas State and delivered a pair of TD drives in the fourth quarter of a 28-17 win over the Wildcats. Keene is likely to be available for this week but Big XII sources believe HC Kenny Dillingham will stick with Fette for the time being after his encouraging recent efforts. Early-season starter and Kentucky transfer Cutter Boley appears out of the frame at the moment after being benched by Dillingham in the Texas Tech blowout loss three weeks ago.
| Colorado | 25 / 36 | -11 | 30 | 18 | +8.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-0-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Arizona State | 24.3 / 32.3 | -8 | 24 | 15 | +11.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Colorado | 10-31 | Kansas St. | -3 | 47 | 27-24 | Arizona State | 10-31 | @ BYU | +17 | 46.5 | 20-27 |
| | 10-24 | @ Oklahoma . | +13 | 55.5 | 24-57 | | 10-24 | Kansas St. | +1 | 51.5 | 28-17 |
| | 10-17 | Utah | +15 | 49.5 | 24-27 | | 10-17 | @ Texas Tech | +17 | 50 | 25-53 |
|
| 11-22-25 | Arizona State | 42 | -7 | 23 | 45/355 | 12/26/1/225 | 3/3 |
| Colorado | 17 | 47.5 | 12 | 30/135 | 20/39/0/165 | 1/1 |
| Colorado |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-5-1 , O/U:4-3-1 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-6-0 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Georgia Tech | 6.5 | W | 14-13 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Weber State | -38.5 | L | 52-21 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 21-7 | OV | | | W | 42-14 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Northwestern | 3.5 | L | 7-41 | P | 48 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-21 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Baylor | 8 | L | 13-23 | UN | 54.5 | 2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 6 | L | 3-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Texas Tech | 13.5 | L | 7-29 | UN | 50.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Utah | 15 | W | 24-27 | OV | 49.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 9.5 | L | 0-13 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Oklahoma State | 13 | L | 24-57 | OV | 55.5 | 3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | W | 24-23 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Kansas State | -3 | PK | 27-24 | OV | 47 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 23 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-13-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arizona State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:2-4-1 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Morgan State | -43.5 | W | 70-7 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 28-7 | OV | | | W | 49-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas A&M | 14.5 | L | 20-48 | OV | 51.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas | -5.5 | W | 24-17 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | PK | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Baylor | -3 | L | 19-55 | OV | 49.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 13-24 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Hawaii | -20.5 | L | 30-12 | UN | 51 | -5.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -11.5 | L | 17-6 | UN | 27 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas Tech | 17 | L | 25-53 | OV | 50 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 9.5 | 9 | L | 10-43 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Kansas State | 1 | W | 28-17 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 14-10 | UN | 26 |
| 10-31-26 | @ BYU | 17 | W | 20-27 | OV | 46.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 10 | L | 3-17 | UN | 24 |
| 11-07-26 | Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Central Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hawaii | 30 | -6.5 | 42 | -5 | 39 | 52 | 1-3 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 0-4 / 2-2 | -5 / -2.5 | +1.5 / +5 |
| UTEP | 13 | 49 | 49(2) | | 47 | 31 | 1-3 / 0-4 | 1-3 / 0-4 | 1-3 / 2-2 | -3.8 / -41 | +0.5 / +30.5 |
Only in the Mountain West would a team be forced to play at DeKalb and El Paso in consecutive road games, yet fortunately for Hawaii there was a week off to go back home to Honolulu between this pair of trips to these far-flung loop outposts and avoid staying a week in somewhere on the mainland in between. Though perhaps Timmy Chang has finally found some foes against whom his Rainbow Warriors can take out some of their season-long frustrations, as the other bottom-feeder besides UTEP in the Mountain West, Northern Illinois, proved cannon fodder for Hawaii on October 24 in a 56-21 blowout for Chang’s troops. Which, among other things, lessened a bit of the job pressure building on the islands as Chang’s favorite son status among the support base was being tested by disappointing results earlier in the season. There’s still a chance for the Rainbow Warriors to get eligible for the local Sheraton Hawaii Bowl if they can sweep through November, and perhaps frustrated southpaw QB Micah Alejado can shake off his own 2026 disappointments (especially following his 24 TD passes a year ago) after his best effort of the season at DeKalb, tossing for 323 yards and three TDs in the romp past the host Huskies. The lowly Miners might provide some of the same opportunities to flourish, as regional sources are wondering if beleaguered HC Scotty Walden (just 6-26 in his third year on the job) will get invited back for a fourth spin in 2027. After all, UTEP hasn’t scored more than 13 points in a game in nearly two months, and its only offense seems to come on broken or trick-plays involving backup QB Raymond Moore II, who lined up in the backfield with starting QB EJ Colson Jr for the opening play last Saturday at North Dakota State, then took a direct snap and raced around end for a 57-yard score...and that was it for Miners scoring. If Chang can’t outscore this foe, he might have to take refuge on Kauai or Molokai rather than return to Honolulu.
Play Hawaii
| Hawaii | 26 / 24 | +2 | 42 | 34 | +11 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| UTEP | 10.3 / 28.3 | -18 | 49 | 38 | +13.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Hawaii | 10-24 | @ No Illino. | -2.5 | 49 | 56-21 | UTEP | 10-31 | @ North Dak. | +23.5 | 44 | 7-31 |
| | 10-17 | New Mexico | +14.5 | 46.5 | 10-21 | | 10-17 | San Jose . | +6.5 | 46.5 | 11-24 |
| | 10-10 | @ Arizona S. | +20.5 | 51 | 12-30 | | 10-10 | Nevada | +10 | 48.5 | 13-30 |
| Hawaii |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-6 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:1-7-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:2-6-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Stanford | 4.5 | L | 27-37 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10 | 3 | L | 7-14 | UN | 24 |
| 09-05-26 | UNLV | 1.5 | L | 6-21 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | New Mexico State | -7.5 | W | 29-19 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 9-0 | UN | 10 | -4 | W | 19-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Wyoming | -2 | L | 10-27 | UN | 44 | -0.5 | L | 3-3 | UN | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-13 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | San Jose State | -2.5 | L | 16-20 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -1.5 | L | 0-14 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Arizona State | 20.5 | W | 12-30 | UN | 51 | 5.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 11.5 | W | 6-17 | UN | 27 |
| 10-17-26 | New Mexico | 14.5 | W | 10-21 | UN | 46.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ No Illinois | -2.5 | W | 56-21 | OV | 49 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 35-14 | OV | 24 |
| 11-07-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UTEP |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-7 , PSR:1-7 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:1-7 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-6-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Oklahoma | 41 | L | 0-51 | UN | 51.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | OV | 12.5 | 24 | L | 0-27 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | Texas Southern | -26.5 | W | 51-10 | OV | 53 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Michigan | 34.5 | L | 17-52 | OV | 48.5 | 7.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 20 | W | 14-17 | OV | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Oregon State | 11 | L | 7-33 | UN | 56 | 2.5 | L | 0-17 | OV | 12.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ New Mexico | 23.5 | L | 7-61 | OV | 47.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 14 | L | 0-21 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Nevada | 10 | L | 13-30 | UN | 48.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-13 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | San Jose State | 6.5 | L | 11-24 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Dakota State | 23.5 | L | 7-31 | UN | 44 | 6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 13.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Hawaii | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| BYU | 23 | 49.5 | 15 | | 14 | 24 | 5-0 / 2-1 | 4-1 / 2-1 | 3-2 / 2-1 | +18.4 / +5.7 | -15 / -10 |
| Utah | 24 | -3.5 | 12(3) | -6 | 13 | 25 | 5-0 / 3-0 | 5-0 / 2-1 | 2-3 / 3-0 | +28.6 / +13.7 | -20 / -10 |
It’s an in-state Holy War that has every LDS member from Mitt Romney to Marie Osmond paying attention as Utah and BYU square off for the first time ever as top-ten rated teams. Edges are hard to identify, but Big XII sources are keeping an eye on some key developments. First is if star Cougar running back LJ Martin, who gained over 1,300 rushing yards a year ago, will be available after missing action with an ankle injury suffered vs. TCU last month. Has he been missed? Consider that a committee of QB Bear Bachmeier, RB Sione Moa and jet-sweep specialist Legend Glasker gained 47 yards on the ground in a struggle last Saturday vs. a middling Arizona State. The Cougars also spent much of October flying very close to the flame, outlasting a gnarly TCU in a dreary Fort Worth rain, then surviving a last-play Notre Dame threat on the doorstep of the BYU end zone two weeks later before finally falling into the abyss in OT at UCF. Other recent wins over Iowa State and Arizona State have been similarly labored--all minus Martin. So, his return would be most welcomed, especially by the rough-hewn Bachmeier, who has seen opposing defenses gang up on him in recent weeks and forcing him to the air, which he mostly did with some aplomb last week vs. the Sun Devils when passing for 236 yards, and engineering the Cougs’ longest scoring drive of the season–95 yards–just when BYU needed it when clinging to a 20-17 lead in the fourth quarter. Kalani Sitake’s big and brawling defense is also stingy vs. the run, among the nation’s leaders while allowing just 100 ypg and 3.3 yards per carry. That’s important, as we have a hard time envisioning the Utes getting their bread-and-butter ground game going with any great efficiency against this Provo defense. (Leading Utah rusher Wayshawn Parker, with 726 rushing yards and 6.7 yards per carry, was held out of the second half of last week’s blowout win at Cincinnati due to a thigh contusion, but isn’t expected to miss on Saturday). Like it is for BYU when it has the ball, the Utes’ fortunes likely rest with their own do-everything QB, Devon Dampier, who pulled the Houston game out of the fire a couple of weeks ago and has already accounted for 23 TDs this season. It’s worth noting that BYU won this matchup 24-21 at Provo last October, a third-straight series win and second in a row since the rivalry resumed in 2024. Those last two wins, however, have been by four points total, and as we have a hard time seeing this war becoming a runaway, the near six-point spread is hardly inconsequential. There is room in the number for the host Utes to get the win but not the cover...which is what we think happens in Salt Lake City.
Play BYU
11/02 11:07 PM PST — Top Utes rusher Wayshawn Parker (726 YR) missed the second half of last week's 49-25 win at Cincinnati due to a thigh contusion. Regional sources, however, report the move was mostly cautionary as the game was well in hand, and Parker is expected to be available for this BYU showdown.
11/03 12:10 PM PST — Out since twisting an ankle on October 3 at TCU, last year's leading BYU rusher LJ Martin (1,305 yards in 2025) will reportedly have a chance to return to active duty on Saturday, though HC Kalani Sitake won't know for sure until later in the week.
| BYU | 28.7 / 27.7 | +1 | 15 | 18 | -4.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Utah | 32.3 / 20.7 | +11.7 | 12 | 24 | -9.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| BYU | 10-31 | Arizona S. | -17 | 46.5 | 27-20 | Utah | 10-31 | @ Cincinnat. | -7 | 56.5 | 49-25 |
| | 10-24 | @ Central F. | -7.5 | 44 | 31-39 | | 10-24 | Houston U | -6 | 57.5 | 21-13 |
| | 10-17 | Notre Dame | +10.5 | 47.5 | 28-24 | | 10-17 | @ Colorado | -15 | 49.5 | 27-24 |
|
| 10-18-25 | Utah | 21 | -4.5 | 24 | 37/226 | 20/36/1/244 | 2/1 |
| BYU | 24 | 49.5 | 22 | 42/202 | 13/24/0/166 | 0/0 |
| 11-09-24 | BYU | 22 | -3 | 20 | 32/120 | 15/33/0/219 | 2/0 |
| Utah | 21 | 40.5 | 15 | 30/147 | 12/22/2/112 | 2/1 |
| BYU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Dixie State | -50.5 | W | 63-7 | OV | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 42-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona U | -6.5 | W | 28-17 | UN | 48.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Colorado State | -17.5 | W | 41-23 | OV | 55 | -4.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 11.5 | -9.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ TCU | -5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 7-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-09-26 | Iowa State | -11.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7 | W | 14-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Notre Dame | 10.5 | W | 28-24 | OV | 47.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-10 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Central Florida | -7.5 | L | 31-39 | OV | 44 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -4 | L | 14-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona State | -17 | L | 27-20 | OV | 46.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -10 | W | 17-3 | UN | 24 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Cincinnati U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:8-0 , PSR:7-1 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:7-0 , PSR:7-1 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1H SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:5-3-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Idaho | -38 | W | 66-14 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | W | 17-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 31-7 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Arkansas | -13.5 | W | 43-10 | UN | 55.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | W | 29-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Utah State | -26.5 | W | 33-0 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | W | 16-0 | OV | 13.5 | -15.5 | W | 26-0 | UN | 30 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Iowa State | -7.5 | W | 31-17 | OV | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -4.5 | W | 24-3 | OV | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | Kansas | -15.5 | W | 41-24 | OV | 49.5 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -9.5 | L | 21-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Colorado | -15 | L | 27-24 | OV | 49.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -9.5 | W | 13-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Houston U | -6 | W | 21-13 | UN | 57.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -4 | L | 0-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Cincinnati U | -7 | W | 49-25 | OV | 56.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | -4 | W | 42-6 | OV | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arizona U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Delaware | 33 | -1 | 38 | -6 | 42 | 42 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 1-3 / 3-1 | +12.5 / -9.3 | -8 / +10.5 |
| Kennesaw State | 24 | 57 | 45(1) | | 43 | 46 | 1-3 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 3-1 | 1-3 / 1-3 | +1 / -5.8 | -4.5 / +9.5 |
Delaware and QB Nick Minicucci have made the Blue Hens an easy team to handicap. Is Minicucci playing? Bet Delaware. Is Minicucci out? Bet the opponent. The Blue Hens are 5-0 against the spread with Minicucci as the starter and 0-3 straight-up and against the spread without him. The Blue Hens' passer returned from a leg injury two weeks ago against Missouri State, and Delaware has scored 96 points in two games since. Kennesaw broke a six-game losing skid with a 44-28 road win at Middle Tennessee last week. The Owls are probably better than their record suggests, but Delaware is a top team in Conference-USA with Minicucci at the helm. Kennesaw's ground-based attack is likely going to struggle to keep up with the Blue Hens' high-powered offense. Playing on the road hasn't generally been an issue for Delaware, with the exception of that game at Virginia where Minicucci was injured. The Blue Hens covered the spread by 11.5 points at Vanderbilt and covered the spread by 16.5 points at Western Kentucky last week.
Play Delaware
| Delaware | 42 / 30.7 | +11.3 | 45 | 45 | -0.5 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Kennesaw State | 23.7 / 28.7 | -5 | 44 | 42 | +1.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Delaware | 10-27 | @ Western K. | +2.5 | 55.5 | 35-21 | Kennesaw State | 10-28 | @ Middle Te. | -1 | 49.5 | 44-28 |
| | 10-20 | Missouri . | -3 | 54.5 | 61-38 | | 10-22 | Liberty | +8 | 50 | 6-34 |
| | 10-13 | @ Middle Te. | -1 | 49.5 | 30-33 | | 10-14 | @ Missouri . | -2.5 | 53 | 21-24 |
| Delaware |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:1-7 , PSR:1-7 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:7-1-0 |
| 09-03-26 | Merrimack College | -31.5 | W | 42-7 | UN | 56.5 | 0 | W | 7-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 21-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Vanderbilt | 20.5 | W | 26-35 | OV | 53.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 11.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Coastal Carolina | -4.5 | W | 22-14 | UN | 56.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | -3 | L | 15-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Virginia | 20 | L | 3-42 | UN | 52 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 11.5 | 10.5 | L | 3-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-02-26 | Liberty | 7 | L | 14-30 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 9.5 | 4 | L | 0-20 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-13-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | -1 | L | 30-33 | OV | 49.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-5 | UN | 9.5 | 0 | W | 16-12 | OV | 24 |
| 10-20-26 | Missouri State | -3 | W | 61-38 | OV | 54.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | -1.5 | L | 24-28 | OV | 27 |
| 10-27-26 | @ Western Kentucky | 2.5 | W | 35-21 | OV | 55.5 | 0 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 28-21 | OV | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kennesaw State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-6 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:3-5-0 |
| 09-03-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -21.5 | W | 47-0 | UN | 50.5 | 0 | W | 19-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 40-0 | OV | 0 |
| 09-12-26 | Georgia State | -7.5 | L | 17-31 | UN | 55.5 | -2.5 | L | 3-6 | UN | 12.5 | -4.5 | L | 3-21 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Tennessee U | 35 | W | 9-42 | UN | 60 | 9.5 | L | 3-15 | OV | 14.5 | 21.5 | W | 3-21 | UN | 34 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Arkansas St | 6.5 | W | 14-17 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-07-26 | Jacksonville St | 3 | W | 26-27 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | W | 16-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-14-26 | @ Missouri State | -2.5 | L | 21-24 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-6 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-22-26 | Liberty | 8 | L | 6-34 | UN | 50 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 5.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | -1 | W | 44-28 | OV | 49.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | W | 19-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 11/03 9:09 pm |
| No Illinois | 20 | 52.5 | 53 | | 50 | 29 | 0-3 / 0-5 | 0-3 / 2-3 | 2-1 / 2-3 | -20 / -22.2 | +4 / +20.5 |
| San Jose State | 23 | -11.5 | 43(1) | -11 | 43 | 26 | 1-3 / 3-2 | 1-3 / 4-1 | 0-4 / 1-4 | -3.5 / -1.6 | -1.5 / +8 |
No, ESPN Game Day isn’t going to be at San Jose for this matchup on Saturday (darned!). That absolves Nick Saban and Pat McAfee from making a pick and leaves us to make a case for either of these Mountain West stragglers...but we’ll try. With a potential epic clash vs. UTEP to perhaps avoid winless conference debut seasons for both on deck for Thanksgiving weekend, Northern Illinois at least has one more realistic chance to notch a win before this campaign mercifully concludes, one that already looked like it was heading off the tracks even before former head coach Michael Hammock took a job on the Super Bowl champion Seahawks staff in February, and Huskies administrators decided to simply affix an interim label to promote defensive aide Rob Harley for the remainder of 2026 before deciding on a permanent move. We’re not sure how that job search is progressing, as only a few oil-rig firefighters and commodity brokers and a few assorted other daredevils are apparently interested in the position on a full-time basis. Nonetheless, escaping dreary DeKalb, where the Huskies had been outscored 84-28 across two previous Mountain West losses and hitting the road in Las Vegas seemed to perk up NIU a bit last week, as the offense showed more life than it has all season in posting 24 points and nearly 500 yards in a combative loss to loop contender UNLV. Western Carolina transfer QB Taren Dickens, who fired 38 TD passes for the Catamounts last season, is at least continuing to wing it and has tossed a pair of scoring tosses in each of the past two games as the Huskies displayed a pulse at Allegiant Stadium, something to hang the hats on after the desultory results from earlier in the season. Meanwhile, even against a winless foe, low-variance San Jose State doesn’t have the look of trustworthy favorite, not with an offense that would have trouble outscoring the local NHL Sharks most nights after tallying more than 16 only vs. the woeful Miners the past four games, and ranking 123rd nationally (19.9 points per game) in scoring. Indeed, that’s part of another angle to explore in this otherwise non-descript matchup, as the Spartans have emerged as one of the nation’s premier “under” teams by landing that way in seven straight since an opening loss at USC. All things considered, this low 50s total looks like a mountain to climb, especially as Ken Niumatalolo has reluctantly turned back to early season-starter Luke Weaver (two more picks last week vs. New Mexico) at QB in a last-ditch attempt to kick-start this stalled San Jose offense.
Play the Under
| No Illinois | 22.7 / 42.7 | -20 | 52 | 40 | +10.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| San Jose State | 17.7 / 20 | -2.3 | 42 | 39 | +5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| No Illinois | 10-31 | @ UNLV | +21.5 | 56 | 24-31 | San Jose State | 10-31 | New Mexico | +15.5 | 44 | 16-21 |
| | 10-24 | Hawaii | +2.5 | 49 | 21-56 | | 10-24 | @ Nevada | +6 | 46 | 13-28 |
| | 10-17 | @ Wyoming | +7.5 | 43 | 23-41 | | 10-17 | @ UTEP | -6.5 | 46.5 | 24-11 |
| No Illinois |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:0-8 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1H SUR:0-8 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:6-1-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Iowa | 31 | L | 0-40 | UN | 44.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-20 | OV | 10 | 18.5 | L | 0-33 | OV | 24 |
| 09-12-26 | Illinois State | 2.5 | L | 24-28 | OV | 48 | | L | 0-14 | OV | | | L | 17-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arizona U | 34.5 | W | 17-42 | OV | 50 | 7.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 10-28 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia State | 8.5 | L | 14-35 | UN | 56.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Air Force | 6.5 | L | 7-28 | UN | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Wyoming | 7.5 | L | 23-41 | OV | 43 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 7.5 | 4 | L | 6-20 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Hawaii | 2.5 | L | 21-56 | OV | 49 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 14-35 | OV | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | @ UNLV | 21.5 | W | 24-31 | UN | 56 | 6.5 | W | 14-10 | OV | 13.5 | 13.5 | W | 17-24 | OV | 28.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Jose State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-5 , PSR:5-4 , O/U:1-8-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:0-8-0 | 1H SUR:5-4 , PSR:4-3-1 , O/U:1-7-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ USC | 37 | W | 26-42 | OV | 61 | 10 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14 | 23.5 | L | 0-28 | UN | 34 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Eastern Michigan | 1 | W | 27-21 | UN | 55 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 0 | W | 10-7 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Cal Poly | -21.5 | L | 30-20 | UN | 58.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 13-6 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Fresno State | 4 | L | 10-26 | UN | 47.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | PK | 3-6 | UN | 24 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Hawaii | 2.5 | W | 20-16 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 1.5 | W | 14-0 | UN | 25.5 |
| 10-09-26 | Wyoming | -4 | L | 13-16 | UN | 42.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -3 | L | 7-6 | UN | 21 |
| 10-17-26 | @ UTEP | -6.5 | W | 24-11 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Nevada | 6 | L | 13-28 | UN | 46 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | New Mexico | 15.5 | W | 16-21 | UN | 44 | 2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 8.5 | W | 9-14 | OV | 21.5 |
| 11-07-26 | No Illinois | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Penn State | 20 | 46 | 18 | | 16 | 25 | 3-2 / 1-2 | 3-2 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 0-2 | +17.8 / -2 | -16.5 / -7 |
| Washington U | 27 | -2 | 18(3) | -3 | 18 | 14 | 3-2 / 2-1 | 0-5 / 3-0 | 3-2 / 1-2 | +5.6 / +5 | -22 / +6 |
Penn State earned a 35-6 home win over Washington in 2024 in the lone meeting since the Huskies joined the Big Ten. The Nittany Lions broke their four-game losing streak with a 31-17 home win over Purdue. Penn State's defense was fantastic in that contest, but we still have some (major?) reservations about the Nittany Lions' offense. In his weekly press conference, offensive coordinator Taylor Mouser explained how he simplified the offense during Penn State's bye week. The improvement was notable immediately as the Nittany Lions produced a 96-yard and a 75-yard touchdown drive in the first quarter against the Boilermakers. Penn State executed the scripted portion of the playbook to perfection. But what about the rest of the game? Penn State only scored ten points over its final five possessions, and one of those scoring drives started on Purdue's 41-yard-line. The Nittany Lions are hoping to get some good news on the wide receiver front. Chase Sowell is expected to play this week after missing last week's win over Purdue. The Iowa State transfer has 34 catches while averaging 15.0 yards per reception this season. Koby Howard is now listed as questionable after missing each of the last five games with a lower body injury. The Nittany Lions originally hoped to have Howard back a couple weeks ago, but he suffered some setbacks in his treatment. Howard produced 344 receiving yards and two touchdowns in Penn State's first three games. Ultimately, we need to see more before Penn State deserves an upgrade, in our opinion. After scoring an average of 18.5 points per game during the four-game losing streak, we don't believe the Nittany Lions' issues were fixed after one game against Purdue. We'll know a lot more after a cross-country trip to Seattle.
Play Washington
11/03 11:03 AM PST — Penn State wide receiver Chase Sowell is expected to play this week at Washington after missing last week's win over Purdue. Koby Howard is now listed as questionable after missing each of the last five games with a lower body injury.
| Penn State | 24 / 23 | +1 | 19 | 18 | -1.5 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Washington U | 26.3 / 25.7 | +0.7 | 21 | 19 | +2.5 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Penn State | 10-31 | Purdue | -10 | 55.5 | 31-17 | Washington U | 10-31 | @ Nebraska | +7.5 | 49.5 | 17-10 |
| | 10-17 | @ Michigan | +6 | 43 | 18-21 | | 10-16 | @ Purdue | +3 | 50.5 | 38-26 |
| | 10-10 | USC | PK | 54.5 | 23-31 | | 10-09 | Iowa | -3 | 41.5 | 24-41 |
|
| 11-09-24 | Washington U | 6 | 47.5 | 14 | 33/74 | 16/23/1/119 | 1/0 |
| Penn State | 35 | -13.5 | 24 | 40/266 | 20/30/0/220 | 1/1 |
| Penn State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:1-5-2 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1H SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:5-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Marshall | -23 | W | 45-0 | UN | 53.5 | -7 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Temple | -24 | L | 27-9 | UN | 49.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -13.5 | L | 10-3 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | Buffalo U | -40 | W | 55-13 | OV | 48.5 | -10.5 | W | 17-3 | OV | 13.5 | -24 | W | 34-6 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | Wisconsin | -9.5 | L | 20-24 | P | 44 | -2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6 | W | 17-7 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-02-26 | @ Northwestern | -3 | L | 13-34 | P | 47 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 23 |
| 10-10-26 | USC | 0 | L | 23-31 | UN | 54.5 | 0 | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | 17-17 | OV | 27 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Michigan | 6 | W | 18-21 | UN | 43 | 1.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 21 |
| 10-31-26 | Purdue | -10 | W | 31-17 | UN | 55.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 27.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Minnesota U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Rutgers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Washington U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Washington State | -24 | L | 24-10 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | L | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -14 | L | 10-0 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Utah State | -28 | L | 16-14 | UN | 55.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -17 | L | 10-7 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Eastern Washington | -42.5 | L | 48-16 | OV | 59 | | W | 14-3 | OV | | | W | 31-10 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Minnesota U | -12 | L | 24-27 | OV | 45 | -2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 23 |
| 10-03-26 | @ USC | 7 | W | 21-25 | UN | 57 | 2.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | 4 | W | 14-10 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-09-26 | Iowa | -3 | L | 24-41 | OV | 41.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-13 | OV | 7.5 | -1.5 | L | 3-27 | OV | 20 |
| 10-16-26 | @ Purdue | 3 | W | 38-26 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | 2.5 | W | 24-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Nebraska | 7.5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 49.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 4.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 24 |
| 11-07-26 | Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UL Monroe | 16 | 52.5 | 49 | | 50 | 47 | 0-4 / 1-3 | 0-4 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 2-2 | -17.3 / -16.3 | +5 / +16 |
| Arkansas St | 34 | -14 | 40(1) | -10 | 39 | 41 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 1-3 | +11.8 / -8.8 | -9.5 / +7.5 |
Arkansas State was on a 15-game winning streak in this Sun Belt matchup before Monroe earned a 28-16 home win last season. If the WarHawks want to make it two wins over the RedWolves, they've got an uphill climb ahead of them. Arkansas State is coming off its bye week after previously beating Southern Miss and Georgia State. Monroe snapped its 14-game losing streak with an upset win over Troy two weeks ago, but the WarHawks found themselves back in the loss column after last week's 14-point home loss to Southern Miss. Monroe has a short week on the horizon as the WarHawks will host in-state rival Louisiana next Thursday. Put all of that in a blender and Monroe is likely in trouble in this matchup. You've got Arkansas State coming off a bye looking for revenge against an opponent that is probably going to prioritize their next game ahead of this one. The RedWolves normally aren't the type of team to flex their offensive muscle, but given the situation, this one could get pretty ugly. Prior to Monroe's win last year, Arkansas State had won the previous nine editions by an average of 16.6 points per game.
Play Arkansas State
| UL Monroe | 14 / 24.3 | -10.3 | 52 | 41 | +10 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Arkansas St | 36.7 / 33.7 | +3 | 39 | 44 | -2 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| UL Monroe | 10-31 | So Missis. | +3.5 | 55 | 21-35 | Arkansas St | 10-24 | Georgia S. | +2.5 | 58.5 | 38-32 |
| | 10-24 | @ Troy | +13 | 51.5 | 21-14 | | 10-17 | @ So Missis. | -5.5 | 61 | 23-13 |
| | 10-17 | Louisiana. | +13.5 | 56 | 0-24 | | 10-08 | South Ala. | -3 | 60.5 | 49-56 |
|
| 09-27-25 | Arkansas St | 16 | 55 | 22 | 27/17 | 29/46/1/288 | 2/1 |
| UL Monroe | 28 | -1.5 | 18 | 33/217 | 16/25/1/175 | 0/0 |
| 11-23-24 | UL Monroe | 21 | 51.5 | 19 | 38/256 | 11/22/1/137 | 1/1 |
| Arkansas St | 28 | -3 | 21 | 39/187 | 18/26/0/170 | 0/0 |
| UL Monroe |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-7 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:1-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:1-6 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-3-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Mississippi St | 28.5 | L | 13-62 | OV | 54.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 13.5 | 17 | L | 3-41 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ UAB | 9 | W | 20-26 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13 | 6 | W | 17-10 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | SE Louisiana | -9.5 | L | 35-38 | OV | 48.5 | | L | 0-7 | OV | | | L | 13-24 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | Florida Atlantic | 12 | L | 17-45 | OV | 58 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | L | 17-35 | OV | 29 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Alabama | 13 | L | 35-52 | OV | 56.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | L | 14-31 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Louisiana Tech | 13.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 56 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 29 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Troy | 13 | W | 21-14 | UN | 51.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | W | 3-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | So Mississippi | 3.5 | L | 21-35 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 2 | L | 0-10 | UN | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Marshall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Arkansas St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:3-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Memphis | 10.5 | L | 24-42 | OV | 52.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-21 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | WEST GEORGIA | -31.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 56.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ TCU | 19 | L | 7-31 | UN | 56.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 10.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Kennesaw State | -6.5 | L | 17-14 | UN | 53 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana | 5 | W | 20-23 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | W | 10-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-08-26 | South Alabama | -3 | L | 49-56 | OV | 60.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | -1.5 | L | 28-34 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ So Mississippi | -5.5 | W | 23-13 | UN | 61 | -0.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | W | 16-7 | UN | 31 |
| 10-24-26 | Georgia State | 2.5 | W | 38-32 | OV | 58.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 11-07-26 | UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Georgia | 31 | -3.5 | 1.5 | -5.5 | 3 | 12 | 4-1 / 2-0 | 3-2 / 2-0 | 5-0 / 1-1 | +31.8 / +15.5 | -29 / -11 |
| Mississippi | 28 | 56.5 | 10(3) | | 9 | 18 | 4-0 / 1-2 | 3-1 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 3-0 | +24.5 / +1.3 | -14 / -1 |
The home team has won-and-covered each of the last five regular season meetings between the Rebels and Dawgs, but these SEC foes met twice last season. Georgia earned a 45-35 home win in October, but Ole Miss got the bigger one with a 39-34 upset in the Sugar Bowl as part of the College Football Playoff. Most of the major pieces from last year's meetings are still around, with a notable exception on the Ole Miss side. Rebels’ running back Kewan Lacy (5.0 yards per carry with five TDs) is not expected to return for this one as he deals with a shoulder injury. Lacy has missed two games this season, including last week's blowout win over Auburn. Lacy finished with 98 rushing yards and two touchdowns in the Rebels' Sugar Bowl win. Both of last year's contests flew over their respective totals. The first game probably wasn't much of a surprise since Lane Kiffin was the Rebels' coach last October, but not too many people expected to see 73 points at the Superdome in New Orleans ten weeks later. We're willing to hop back on that train. Lacy is a terrific running back, but if his absence means the ball is going to stay in the hands of Trinidad Chambliss, then that's a trade we're willing to accept. Chambliss went 30-of-46 for 362 yards with two touchdowns and no interceptions against the Dawgs on New Year's Day. The over is 6-2 in Georgia's games this season. Four of Ole Miss' last five games have gone over the total.
Play the Over
11/02 1:44 PM PST — Ole Miss running back Kewan Lacy (5.0 yards per carry with five TDs) is not expected to return for this one as he deals with a shoulder injury. Lacy has missed two games this season, including last week's blowout win over Auburn.
| Georgia | 23.7 / 17.3 | +6.3 | 2 | 12 | -9.5 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Mississippi | 34.3 / 17.3 | +17 | 8 | 13 | -4 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Georgia | 10-31 | Florida | -11.5 | 56 | 27-8 | Mississippi | 10-31 | Auburn | -10.5 | 58.5 | 45-15 |
| | 10-17 | Auburn | -19 | 50 | 24-27 | | 10-24 | @ Texas | +3 | 55 | 27-34 |
| | 10-10 | @ Alabama | +2.5 | 52 | 20-17 | | 10-17 | Missouri | -4 | 57 | 31-3 |
|
| 01-01-26 | Mississippi | 39 | 54 | 23 | 27/111 | 30/46/0/362 | 1/1 |
| Georgia | 34 | -6 | 23 | 37/124 | 19/33/0/219 | 1/1 |
| 10-18-25 | Mississippi | 35 | 56.5 | 21 | 24/88 | 19/36/0/263 | 1/0 |
| Georgia | 43 | -7.5 | 34 | 46/224 | 26/31/0/289 | 1/0 |
| 11-09-24 | Georgia | 10 | -2 | 16 | 32/60 | 20/31/1/186 | 4/2 |
| Mississippi | 28 | 55.5 | 19 | 35/133 | 18/28/1/263 | 0/0 |
| Georgia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:7-0 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Tennessee St | -49.5 | W | 63-3 | OV | 55.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Western Kentucky | -40.5 | W | 70-20 | OV | 55.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -24.5 | W | 49-6 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Arkansas | -24.5 | W | 45-17 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | W | 21-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma | -11 | W | 41-13 | OV | 44 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -7 | W | 28-0 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Vanderbilt | -25.5 | L | 38-14 | OV | 50 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | -15.5 | L | 21-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Alabama | 2.5 | W | 20-17 | UN | 52 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-14 | UN | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | Auburn | -19 | L | 24-27 | OV | 50 | -4.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Florida | -11.5 | W | 27-8 | UN | 56 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -7 | W | 24-0 | UN | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mississippi |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1H SUR:6-2 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:2-6-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Louisville | -6.5 | L | 41-38 | OV | 54.5 | -3 | L | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | -4 | PK | 10-6 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Charlotte | -44 | L | 41-9 | UN | 59.5 | -13.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 14.5 | -27.5 | L | 27-0 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | LSU | 3 | W | 32-24 | UN | 59 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | 1.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Florida | 4 | L | 28-52 | OV | 59 | 0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Vanderbilt | -9.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 55 | -3.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -5.5 | W | 42-3 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Missouri | -4 | W | 31-3 | UN | 57 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | W | 21-3 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas | 3 | L | 27-34 | OV | 55 | 0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | L | 3-24 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Auburn | -10.5 | W | 45-15 | OV | 58.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 14-9 | UN | 30.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Wofford | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oklahoma | 23 | 46 | 15 | | 12 | 15 | 2-2 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 1-2 | 1-3 / 1-2 | +8.5 / -9 | -18.5 / +1.5 |
| Florida | 24 | -4 | 16.5(3) | -1.5 | 12 | 3 | 3-1 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-1 | 2-2 / 2-1 | +24.8 / -6.7 | -23 / +1.5 |
If you would have told any Florida fan on Saturday morning, the Gators' defense is going to hold Georgia to 318 total yards on 4.9 yards per play and Georgia QB Gunner Stockton is going to go 13-of-23 for 101 passing yards with no touchdowns, that's a stat line that every one from Danny Wuerffel to Steve Spurrier to Tim Tebow to Emmitt Smith would have signed up for. Unfortunately, it was nowhere near good enough to get past the 'Dawgs on Saturday in Atlanta. Jon Sumrall made the chin-scratching move to go back with QB Aaron Philo over Tramell Jones, and he changed his mind in a hurry. Two of Philo's seven pass attempts ended up in the hands of a Georgia defender and the Bulldogs' defense held Gator running back Jadan Baugh to 2.2 yards per carry. Florida moved the ball a little bit when Jones got in the game, but his success was largely built in garbage time after the Dawgs had already built a 17-0 lead. Things aren’t much better in Norman where the Sooners are licking their wounds after falling to South Carolina. Once one of the hottest names in coaching circles, Oklahoma fired offensive coordinator Ben Arbuckle after last week's defeat. The Sooners were the beneficiary of three Gamecock interceptions, and the offense couldn't do anything with the extra possessions. In 2024, the combo of Arbuckle and QB John Mateer scored 36.6 points per game (No. 6) while generating 6.62 yards per play (No. 10) at Washington State. Their success at that level never translated to the SEC, and now a familiar name will be taking over the offense for the rest of the season. Tight ends coach Jason Witten will serve as the Sooners' primary playcaller down the stretch. There are whispers around Norman that head coach Brent Venables may not be done making changes. In his early-week press conference, Venables said, "We've got a couple good young quarterbacks in Whitt Newbauer and Bowe Bentley" and he declined to officially name Mateer the starter this week. We're intrigued.
Play Oklahoma
11/02 12:42 PM PST — Oklahoma fired offensive coordinator Ben Arbuckle after last week's loss to South Carolina. Tight ends coach Jason Witten will serve as the Sooners' primary playcaller down the stretch.
| Oklahoma | 20.3 / 26 | -5.7 | 14 | 17 | -4 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Florida | 18 / 29.7 | -11.7 | 11 | 10 | +5 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 0-1 / 0-1 |
| Oklahoma | 10-31 | South Car. | -3.5 | 44 | 25-42 | Florida | 10-31 | @ Georgia | +11.5 | 56 | 8-27 |
| | 10-24 | @ Mississip. | -2 | 49 | 23-15 | | 10-17 | @ Texas | +13 | 51.5 | 27-24 |
| | 10-17 | Kentucky | -7 | 44.5 | 13-21 | | 10-10 | South Car. | -10 | 59.5 | 19-38 |
| Oklahoma |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:3-5-0 |
| 09-04-26 | UTEP | -41 | W | 51-0 | UN | 51.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | OV | 12.5 | -24 | W | 27-0 | UN | 30 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Michigan | -5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 43.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 0-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-19-26 | New Mexico | -21.5 | L | 14-6 | UN | 45.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -12.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Georgia | 11 | L | 13-41 | OV | 44 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 7 | L | 0-28 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Texas | 7.5 | W | 27-24 | OV | 41 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 4 | L | 7-17 | OV | 20 |
| 10-17-26 | Kentucky | -7 | L | 13-21 | UN | 44.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 7.5 | -4 | L | 10-7 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Mississippi St | -2 | W | 23-15 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0 | W | 10-0 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | South Carolina | -3.5 | L | 25-42 | OV | 44 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2 | L | 10-28 | OV | 22.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Florida Atlantic | -25.5 | W | 66-21 | OV | 59.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Campbell | -51.5 | L | 52-3 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 10-3 | OV | | | W | 45-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Auburn | -2.5 | W | 44-39 | OV | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Mississippi | -4 | W | 52-28 | OV | 59 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Missouri | -5.5 | L | 17-45 | OV | 58 | -0.5 | L | 3-3 | UN | 13.5 | -3 | L | 10-20 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-10-26 | South Carolina | -10 | L | 19-38 | UN | 59.5 | -2.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7 | L | 10-17 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Texas | 13 | W | 27-24 | UN | 51.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | PK | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Georgia | 11.5 | L | 8-27 | UN | 56 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 7 | L | 0-24 | UN | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| West Virginia | 24 | 68.5 | 24 | | 27 | 20 | 3-2 / 1-1 | 2-3 / 1-0-1 | 5-0 / 1-1 | +3.4 / +0.5 | -12.5 / +6.5 |
| Texas Tech | 35 | -16 | 16(3) | -11 | 11 | 18 | 5-0 / 2-1 | 3-2 / 1-2 | 4-1 / 2-1 | +19.2 / +6.7 | -21.5 / -17 |
Texas Tech is 6-1 straight-up and against the spread over the last seven meetings, including a 49-0 win in Morgantown last season. Four of the last five meetings have stayed under the total, and although that sounds like a trip to the dentist when West Virginia is involved, we do believe there's some value in another “under” result this week. Yes, the Mountaineers' roster is better and West Virginia is playing better than it did a year ago. And yes, Texas Tech's defense has taken a step back from where the Red Raiders were a year ago. But West Virginia is averaging 11.3 points per game over the last four meetings in this Big XII matchup. When you get shut-out and only gain 180 total yards against an opponent 11 months ago, you've got quite the gap that needs to be overcome.Texas Tech made the somewhat-surprising move from original-starter Will Hammond to on-again-off-again reserve QB Thomas Castellanos, and the three-time transfer rewarded his coach's confidence. Castellanos, who has spent the same amount of time crafting NCAA appeals as he's spent on the practice field this season, ran for 117 yards and a touchdown in last week's 34-26 home win over Arizona. Notice we didn't say anything about his passing numbers. Assuming Castellanos gets the nod once again, his legs are the Red Raiders' biggest asset. The same is true on the other side with Oklahoma transfer QB Michael Hawkins Jr. partnered with running back Cam Cook. We've got two offenses that want to run the ball with a mobile QB, which will keep the clock running. We've got two defenses that see a mobile QB every day in practice and have a general idea what to look for in play action, etc.. Given the series history, this total looks a few ticks too high.
Play the Under
| West Virginia | 33.3 / 38 | -4.7 | 29 | 22 | +4 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Texas Tech | 37 / 29.3 | +7.7 | 10 | 23 | -10.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| West Virginia | 10-24 | @ TCU | +10 | 58.5 | 24-20 | Texas Tech | 10-31 | Arizona U | -4 | 55 | 34-26 |
| | 10-17 | Cincinnat. | -1.5 | 64.5 | 45-42 | | 10-24 | @ Cincinnat. | -11 | 58 | 24-37 |
| | 10-10 | Arizona U | +3.5 | 61.5 | 31-52 | | 10-17 | Arizona S. | -17 | 50 | 53-25 |
|
| 11-29-25 | Texas Tech | 49 | -24.5 | 32 | 54/188 | 29/40/1/384 | 2/1 |
| West Virginia | 0 | 53 | 9 | 22/37 | 16/32/2/143 | 1/0 |
| 11-30-24 | West Virginia | 15 | 62 | 25 | 35/158 | 29/40/2/265 | 2/1 |
| Texas Tech | 52 | -2.5 | 31 | 33/210 | 28/42/1/359 | 0/0 |
| West Virginia |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-3-1 , O/U:7-1-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Coastal Carolina | -21 | L | 31-24 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Tenn Martin | -41.5 | W | 52-7 | OV | 57 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Virginia | 10.5 | W | 38-27 | OV | 51.5 | 1.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Oklahoma State | -2 | L | 24-41 | OV | 60.5 | 0 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13 | -0.5 | W | 14-13 | UN | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa State | 3 | PK | 42-45 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 1.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Arizona U | 3.5 | L | 31-52 | OV | 61.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 1.5 | L | 17-24 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Cincinnati U | -1.5 | W | 45-42 | OV | 64.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 0 | L | 14-21 | OV | 31.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ TCU | 10 | W | 24-20 | UN | 58.5 | 1.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 30 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Houston U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-1 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:4-4 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Abilene Christian | -45 | L | 33-10 | UN | 60.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Oregon State | -26 | L | 35-24 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | L | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | -14.5 | L | 14-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-18-26 | Houston U | -8 | L | 28-26 | OV | 52.5 | -2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 14-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Sam Houston St | -34.5 | W | 49-14 | OV | 55.5 | -7.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -20.5 | L | 21-14 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Colorado | -13.5 | W | 29-7 | UN | 50.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Arizona State | -17 | W | 53-25 | OV | 50 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 9.5 | -9 | W | 43-10 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Cincinnati U | -11 | L | 24-37 | OV | 58 | -3.5 | L | 6-3 | UN | 13.5 | -7 | L | 6-24 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Arizona U | -4 | W | 34-26 | OV | 55 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 27.5 |
| 11-07-26 | West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Oklahoma State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Baylor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-26-26 | TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oregon | 22 | 45 | 9 | | 7 | 18 | 4-1 / 1-2 | 2-3 / 1-2 | 3-2 / 2-1 | +20 / -1.7 | -20.5 / -12.5 |
| Ohio State | 24 | -7.5 | 11(3) | -1 | 7 | 14 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 3-1 | 4-0 / 0-4 | +40.3 / +2 | -40 / -5.5 |
Not exactly the marquee battle with national ranking implications, or that QB matchup that would have had Mel Kiper Jr and all of the draftniks excited had it been a Dante Moore vs. Julian Sayin battle inside of Oregon-Ohio State. Instead, the loser (certainly if it’s the Ducks) is likely out of the playoff picture by the first week in November, and we’ve got what seems to be a Dylan Raiola-Luke Fahey QB clash along the banks of the Olentangy. While Raiola, a previous two-year starter at Nebraska who had mostly disappointed in relief of the injured Moore, finally showed some juice last week when rallying the Webfoots past Northwestern in Eugene, Fahey’s shortcomings and significant downgrade from Sayin have been all too obvious since he came in late against Indiana back on October 17. We advise not to be swayed by some of Fahey’s misleading-looking stats last Saturday in the rain at USC, compiled mostly on short dump-offs that the Trojans were conceding as they nursed a double-digit lead. For many Big Ten observers, it reminded of the last time Ryan Day was short of QBs back in the 2023 Cotton Bowl vs. Missouri, when the Buckeyes were into deep reserves behind center after Kyle McCord had left the program and backup Devin Brown was KO’d by an ankle sprain, leaving a then very-green frosh Lincoln Keinholz (not the three-years-older version of Keinholz now leading Louisville’s offense) at the controls and also minus top target Marvin Harrison Jr, who opted not to play in the bowl. Harrison’s 2026 version, Jeremiah Smith, is still very much active, but Fahey was so slow in his deliveries last week vs. the Trojans that Smith’s potential distorting ability was wasted, and therein lies Day’s problem as we see it. He’s suddenly very limited at the QB position, and as long as Sayin is out, Ohio State will be a run-first offense featuring Bo Jackson (the other key Jackson RB, Ja’Kobi, is out after foot surgery, hopefully to return by the end of November and the Michigan game). After Dan Lanning’s defense finally began to stiffen in the second half vs. the Chip Kelly-designed Northwestern attack last week, it’s reasonable to assume Oregon can keep this downgraded, sans-Sayin version of the Buckeyes somewhat contained. If so, the Ducks can have a shot to avenge their heavy Rose Bowl playoff defeat to the Bucks from two years if Raiola picks up where he left off last week vs. the Wildcats when passing for 336 yards and three TDs.
Play Oregon
11/03 1:07 PM PST — The Ducks announced last week that QB Dante Moore will not be returning to active duty this season as he continues to deal with protocols after the scary concussion suffered in the September 26 win over USC at the LA Coliseum.
| Oregon | 20.3 / 20.3 | 0 | 10 | 19 | -6.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Ohio State | 27.3 / 20.3 | +7 | 4 | 16 | -13 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 |
| Oregon | 10-31 | Northwest. | -3.5 | 47.5 | 34-26 | Ohio State | 10-31 | @ USC | -6 | 50.5 | 18-30 |
| | 10-24 | @ Illinois | -10.5 | 49 | 10-21 | | 10-17 | @ Indiana | -2.5 | 49.5 | 19-15 |
| | 10-17 | Nebraska | -6 | 51 | 17-14 | | 10-10 | Maryland | -31 | 56.5 | 45-16 |
|
| 01-01-25 | Ohio State | 41 | -2.5 | 20 | 31/181 | 17/26/0/319 | 0/0 |
| Oregon | 21 | 55.5 | 15 | 28/-23 | 29/42/0/299 | 0/0 |
| Oregon |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:1-6 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Boise State | -25.5 | L | 34-27 | OV | 53 | -7 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -14.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Oklahoma State | -24 | L | 31-39 | OV | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -14 | L | 17-24 | OV | 30 |
| 09-18-26 | Portland St | -58.5 | W | 84-0 | OV | 71.5 | | W | 28-0 | OV | | | W | 49-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ USC | -3.5 | W | 41-27 | OV | 60.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-10-26 | UCLA | -10 | L | 15-17 | UN | 58 | -3.5 | L | 6-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6.5 | L | 6-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Nebraska | -6 | L | 17-14 | UN | 51 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 26 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Illinois | -10.5 | L | 10-21 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | Northwestern | -3.5 | W | 34-26 | OV | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 13-20 | OV | 23.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Washington U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ohio State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:7-1 , PSR:7-1 , O/U:7-1-0 | 1H SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:3-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Ball State | -50 | W | 56-3 | OV | 55.5 | -13.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -28.5 | L | 28-3 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Texas | 2 | W | 23-24 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kent State | -52 | W | 59-3 | OV | 58.5 | -13.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14.5 | -31.5 | W | 35-0 | UN | 35.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Illinois | -26 | L | 42-19 | OV | 53.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -14.5 | W | 28-10 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Iowa | -14.5 | W | 31-14 | UN | 46.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-6 | OV | 7.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Maryland | -31 | L | 45-16 | OV | 56.5 | -7.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -18.5 | W | 31-10 | OV | 31 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Indiana | -2.5 | W | 19-15 | UN | 49.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | @ USC | -6 | L | 18-30 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 9.5 | -3 | L | 9-20 | OV | 24.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Oregon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Alabama | 28 | 57.5 | 42 | | 42 | 34 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 3-1 | +8 / -7 | -7 / +8 |
| Louisiana | 27 | -7 | 35.5(2) | -8.5 | 36 | 48 | 4-0 / 1-3 | 2-1-1 / 3-1 | 0-4 / 3-1 | +17 / +0.8 | -9 / +3.5 |
Home field advantage hasn't meant much in this neighborly battle as the road team has won each of the last five meetings. South Alabama earned a 24-22 road win in Lafayette in 2024 and the Ragin' Cajuns returned the favor with a 31-22 win in Mobile last season. That final score barely crept over the closing total (52.5), which broke a string of five-straight "under" results between the Jaguars and Cajuns. The underdog has covered the spread in eight of the last nine meetings with four outright upsets. We think that run can continue on Saturday and we're looking to back South Alabama. As mentioned in our Arkansas State vs UL-Monroe preview, the Cajuns have a short week on deck as Louisiana will travel to Monroe on Thursday. South Alabama has dropped back-to-back games against Marshall and Louisiana Tech, but this looks like a nice buy-low spot on the Jaguars. South Alabama out-gained La Tech by 82 yards and held a 24-16 advantage in first downs, but couldn't overcome a -2 turnover differential. That was a one-point game in the final minutes of the second quarter, but the Jaguars failed to find the end zone after that. From a talent perspective there isn't much separating these teams. If we can get a cleaner game from the Jaguars on Saturday, they’ve got a shot to pull the upset.
Play South Alabama
| South Alabama | 29.7 / 34.7 | -5 | 42 | 39 | +2.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Louisiana | 31.7 / 24.3 | +7.3 | 36 | 41 | -4 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| South Alabama | 10-31 | Louisiana. | +6 | 58 | 20-35 | Louisiana | 10-24 | @ So Missis. | -11.5 | 52.5 | 31-35 |
| | 10-20 | @ Marshall | -2 | 66.5 | 13-20 | | 10-17 | Troy | -3 | 49.5 | 33-6 |
| | 10-08 | @ Arkansas . | +3 | 60.5 | 56-49 | | 10-10 | @ Louisiana. | +3 | 48 | 31-32 |
|
| 11-01-25 | Louisiana | 31 | 52.5 | 23 | 43/166 | 14/16/0/232 | 0/0 |
| South Alabama | 22 | -3.5 | 20 | 36/165 | 20/33/1/203 | 1/0 |
| 11-16-24 | South Alabama | 24 | 60 | 19 | 30/68 | 24/34/1/285 | 1/1 |
| Louisiana | 22 | -6.5 | 22 | 35/137 | 22/30/1/276 | 1/1 |
| South Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:4-2-1 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:5-1-1 |
| 09-05-26 | SE Louisiana | -13.5 | W | 39-14 | UN | 54 | | W | 19-7 | OV | | | W | 22-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Tulane | 10 | W | 24-28 | OV | 48 | 3 | W | 10-0 | P | 10 | 6.5 | W | 10-14 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | Ohio | -7 | L | 41-36 | OV | 49.5 | -1.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 24-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Kentucky | 20.5 | L | 21-45 | OV | 54.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 11.5 | W | 21-24 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | UL Monroe | -13 | W | 52-35 | OV | 56.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 13.5 | -7.5 | W | 31-14 | OV | 28.5 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Arkansas St | 3 | W | 56-49 | OV | 60.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | 1.5 | W | 34-28 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-20-26 | @ Marshall | -2 | L | 13-20 | UN | 66.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-6 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Louisiana Tech | 6 | L | 20-35 | UN | 58 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 12.5 | 3 | L | 20-28 | OV | 29.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Louisiana | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Appalachian St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:5-2-1 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:5-1 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Lamar | -20.5 | W | 38-7 | UN | 48.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ USC | 30.5 | W | 30-49 | OV | 59 | 7.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 18.5 | W | 10-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | UAB | -7 | PK | 21-14 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | -3.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Charlotte | -9 | W | 34-7 | UN | 49 | -2.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | -5.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas St | -5 | L | 23-20 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 7-10 | UN | 24 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | 3 | W | 31-32 | OV | 48 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 10-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Troy | -3 | W | 33-6 | UN | 49.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 19-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ So Mississippi | -11.5 | L | 31-35 | OV | 52.5 | -2.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7 | L | 21-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 11-07-26 | South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-12-26 | @ UL Monroe | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Coastal Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tulsa | 27 | -2.5 | 31.5 | -5 | 34 | 30 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 2-2 | +13 / -2.3 | -6 / -1.5 |
| Tulane | 20 | 50 | 38.5(2) | | 35 | 51 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 1-3 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 2-2 | -0.5 / -5.3 | -4.5 / +7 |
Tulane has won each of the last three meetings, including a 31-14 road win at Tulsa last season. Each of the last five meetings have stayed under the total, and that includes two games that went to overtime. The Green Wave got taken to deep waters last week by 1-7 Charlotte. Tulane eventually earned a 38-31 road win in overtime, but the 49ers gave Tulane all it could handle as a 7.5-point home 'dog. Charlotte held a double-digit lead in the fourth quarter before the Green Wave scored the final 17 points. Tulsa is coming off its bye week after previously falling to Army. The Golden Hurricane have dropped four of their last five games, and the team that started 3-0 is suddenly struggling to qualify for a bowl berth. Remaining games against UTSA and Florida Atlantic will not be easy, so Tulsa could really use this win to get the season back on track. Tulsa's last four games have all gone over the total. We trust Golden Hurricane head coach Tre Lamb to have his team ready in this one. We've mentioned this once or twice in the past, but this year's Tulane team is still searching for that signature performance to hang their hat on. A home victory over Memphis is Tulane's best win thus far, but Tulane wasn't very competitive in other marquee games against Duke, Kansas State and UTSA. We have this game lined closer to a pick'em, but given Tulsa's rest advantage and the revenge angle, we understand why there is support for the Golden Hurricane in the betting market.
Play Tulsa
| Tulsa | 33 / 29.7 | +3.3 | 34 | 36 | 0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Tulane | 29.3 / 30 | -0.7 | 34 | 35 | +0.5 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Tulsa | 10-23 | Army | +1 | 53 | 35-38 | Tulane | 10-30 | @ Charlotte | -7.5 | 47 | 38-31 |
| | 10-17 | @ Rice | -3.5 | 46.5 | 38-17 | | 10-24 | Tex San A. | +3 | 51.5 | 19-42 |
| | 10-10 | @ Navy | +3 | 47.5 | 26-34 | | 10-16 | Memphis | +6.5 | 55.5 | 31-17 |
|
| 09-27-25 | Tulane | 31 | -14.5 | 23 | 42/186 | 18/32/0/252 | 2/1 |
| Tulsa | 14 | 52 | 16 | 37/93 | 18/36/1/245 | 2/1 |
| Tulsa |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Oklahoma State | 12.5 | W | 24-10 | UN | 57.5 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | 7 | W | 10-3 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Sam Houston St | -12.5 | L | 23-17 | UN | 51.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | L | 10-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Texas A&M-Commerce | -41 | W | 42-0 | UN | 56.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Arkansas | 7 | L | 6-34 | UN | 51 | 2.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | L | 0-16 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-01-26 | North Texas | 3 | W | 44-45 | OV | 57 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | W | 17-10 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Navy | 3 | L | 26-34 | OV | 47.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 20-14 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Rice | -3.5 | W | 38-17 | OV | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 21-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-23-26 | Army | 1 | L | 35-38 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 14-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida Atlantic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tulane |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:1-6-1 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:5-2-1 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Duke | 9.5 | L | 3-17 | UN | 51.5 | 3 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | South Alabama | -10 | L | 28-24 | OV | 48 | -3 | L | 0-10 | P | 10 | -6.5 | L | 14-10 | P | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Kansas State | 20.5 | W | 20-31 | OV | 50 | 5.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 10.5 | W | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | So Mississippi | -18 | L | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -5.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -10 | L | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Army | 5.5 | W | 17-20 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-16-26 | Memphis | 6.5 | W | 31-17 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | W | 23-10 | OV | 28 |
| 10-24-26 | Tex San Antonio | 3 | L | 19-42 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 13-21 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-30-26 | @ Charlotte | -7.5 | L | 38-31 | OV | 47 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -5.5 | L | 14-24 | OV | 23.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Vanderbilt | 23 | 48.5 | 21.5 | -2.5 | 19 | 15 | 3-2 / 0-3 | 1-4 / 2-1 | 4-1 / 1-1 | -2.6 / -15.7 | -9.5 / +15 |
| Mississippi St | 31 | -3 | 27(3) | | 19 | 8 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 1-3 | +3.8 / -6.8 | -6 / +10 |
Raise your hand if you thought you would be refreshing AJ Swann injury reports in 2026. Anybody?! The well-traveled quarterback has gone from Vanderbilt to LSU to App State to Mississippi State over the past four seasons, and Jeff Lebby would love to have the veteran available for this one against his former team. With Kamario Taylor out for the year, the Bulldogs have dropped their last four games both straight-up and against the spread. Coach Lebby tried to give the reins to unheralded Billy Puckett, but that experiment was a disaster. Swann provides a steady hand that can run the Bulldogs' offense, but he suffered a shoulder injury in last week's loss to Texas and couldn't continue. A healthy Swann is probably good enough to push the Bulldogs to victory in this matchup, but if Hail State needs to rely on Puckett again, that ship has left the dock. Vanderbilt is coming off a much-needed bye week after starting 0-5 in SEC play. There's been some pro-Mississippi State money in the early market, which would seemingly suggest that there's some positive news for Swann. We can only look in the Bulldogs' direction if he is good-to-go.
| Vanderbilt | 18.3 / 39 | -20.7 | 20 | 16 | +4.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-0 |
| Mississippi St | 6 / 28.3 | -22.3 | 20 | 11 | +13 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Vanderbilt | 10-24 | @ Kentucky | +9.5 | 51 | 17-34 | Mississippi St | 10-31 | @ Texas | +19.5 | 50.5 | 3-31 |
| | 10-17 | Arkansas | -5.5 | 48.5 | 21-31 | | 10-24 | Oklahoma | +2 | 49 | 15-23 |
| | 10-10 | Mississip. | +9.5 | 55 | 17-52 | | 10-17 | @ LSU | +17.5 | 56.5 | 0-31 |
| Vanderbilt |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:5-2-1 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:1-6 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Austin Peay | -28.5 | L | 28-9 | UN | 57.5 | | L | 5-6 | OV | | | W | 15-9 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Delaware | -20.5 | L | 35-26 | OV | 53.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -11.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | NC State | -3 | W | 35-31 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Auburn | 10 | W | 15-21 | UN | 54.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 6.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Georgia | 25.5 | W | 14-38 | OV | 50 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 15.5 | W | 14-21 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | Mississippi | 9.5 | L | 17-52 | OV | 55 | 3.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 5.5 | L | 3-42 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Arkansas | -5.5 | L | 21-31 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3 | L | 14-14 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Kentucky | 9.5 | L | 17-34 | P | 51 | 3.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 10-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Mississippi St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mississippi St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:4-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | UL Monroe | -28.5 | W | 62-13 | OV | 54.5 | -7.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 13.5 | -17 | W | 41-3 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Minnesota U | -1 | W | 38-13 | UN | 53.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 11.5 | 0 | W | 28-6 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ South Carolina | 3.5 | W | 41-34 | OV | 60 | 0.5 | L | 0-13 | UN | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 14-23 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Missouri | -3.5 | W | 31-24 | UN | 58.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Alabama | 5.5 | L | 23-56 | OV | 63 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 2.5 | L | 17-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ LSU | 17.5 | L | 0-31 | UN | 56.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Oklahoma | 2 | L | 15-23 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 0 | L | 0-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Texas | 19.5 | L | 3-31 | UN | 50.5 | 4.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 11 | L | 0-17 | UN | 26.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Tennessee Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rice | 24 | 65.5 | 43 | | 45 | 37 | 1-3 / 0-4 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 2-2 | -0.5 / -21 | 0 / +19 |
| North Texas | 45 | -14.5 | 27(2) | -18 | 33 | 39 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 4-0 | +33.5 / -9.8 | -20 / +9.5 |
Like ships passing in the night, or, considering the locale, maybe big rigs on I-35 is more appropriate, but these Texas-based American entries have been heading in decidedly different directions since September. Scott Abell’s unique “Gun-Option” schemes at Rice are not translating into wins like they did for him in the FCS at Davidson, when the Wildcats were annually among the nation’s rushing leaders and often in the playoffs during Abell’s seven-season run at Steph Curry’s alma mater. Instead, things have turned a bit schizophrenic for the Owls, who haven’t won since the opener vs. crosstown Houston Christian but when last seen had uncovered a new weapon vs. Florida Atlantic on October 24 when one-man gang QB Jacurri Brown (also Rice’s leading rusher with 669 yards) had to sit due to an ankle injury, opening the door for little-used sophomore QB Gael Ochoa, who proceeded to run wild vs. FAU to the tune of 259 yards in a back-and-forth donnybrook that Rice would lose 51-49. Should Abell stick with Ochoa this week, however, the same element of surprise is likely missing, and besides, North Texas has been doing something Rice hasn’t–winning--since September, now five straight to move atop the American and keep longshot hopes alive to make the playoffs. Ex-Troy and West Virginia head coach Neal Brown is turning out to be an inspired hire in Denton after Eric Morris took most of last year’s prolific offense with him to Oklahoma State; the Mean Green haven’t skipped a beat with an attack scoring right on the heels of last year’s nation’s best 45.1 ppg for Morris (this year it’s 43.8 points per game, behind only top-ranked Miami nationally). Brown is obviously getting more out of transfer QB Tayven Jackson than Scott Frost did last year at UCF, when Jackson tossed only 10 TD passes all season, as he’s already on 22 this term with another month to go, and has been on a real heater in conference play with 16 TD passes (vs. just 3 picks) across the past four loop encounters. Like with Morris last year, UNT has balance, too, with ex-West Virginia RB Jaheim White (who gained almost 1,700 rushing yards across two seasons for Brown before missing almost the entirety of last season due to injury for Rich-Rod at Morgantown) now leading the nation with 1,054 rushing yards while adding a whopping 15 TDs. As it’s worth noting that Rice couldn’t score more than 17 points in the three games before Ochoa’s appearance at QB in Boca Raton, we wonder if the Owls can keep pace, and keep in mind that the Mean Green just saw a somewhat-similar option look when winning and covering at Navy two weeks ago.
Play North Texas
11/03 1:11 PM PST — With do-eveything QB Jacurri Brown out with an ankle injury, the Owls unveiled a stealth weapon, sophomore QB Gael Ochoa, who rushed for a whopping 259 yards out of Scott Abell's ground-oriented "Gun-Option" in a wild 51-49 Rice loss in Boca Raton on October 24. Brown's status remains up in the air for this weekend, though when last seen, the Owls didn't seem to miss him much at FAU.
| Rice | 26 / 39 | -13 | 45 | 35 | +7.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| North Texas | 49 / 30 | +19 | 33 | 41 | -15.5 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Rice | 10-24 | @ Florida A. | +9 | 55 | 49-51 | North Texas | 10-29 | Florida A. | -15.5 | 78.5 | 48-41 |
| | 10-17 | Tulsa | +3.5 | 46.5 | 17-38 | | 10-24 | @ Navy | -3 | 60 | 49-39 |
| | 10-10 | @ East Caro. | +10 | 46.5 | 12-28 | | 10-10 | Charlotte | -27.5 | 58 | 50-10 |
|
| 11-22-25 | North Texas | 56 | -18 | 25 | 32/171 | 19/23/0/469 | 0/0 |
| Rice | 24 | 57 | 24 | 53/296 | 14/21/0/101 | 0/0 |
| Rice |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-7 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-6 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Houston Baptist | -22.5 | W | 31-3 | UN | 47.5 | | W | 7-3 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Notre Dame | 44.5 | L | 0-52 | UN | 54.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14 | 26.5 | L | 0-42 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Western Michigan | 7.5 | W | 21-28 | OV | 43.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 5 | L | 7-14 | UN | 21.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Fresno State | 12 | L | 24-38 | OV | 43 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Tex San Antonio | 11.5 | W | 14-16 | UN | 56 | 3.5 | W | 7-6 | OV | 12.5 | 6.5 | L | 7-16 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | @ East Carolina | 10 | L | 12-28 | UN | 46.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 6.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Tulsa | 3.5 | L | 17-38 | OV | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2.5 | L | 17-21 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | 9 | W | 49-51 | OV | 55 | 2.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 6 | W | 21-23 | OV | 27.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Texas |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:7-1-0 | 1Q SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:2-3-2 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Indiana | 40 | W | 16-52 | OV | 57.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-14 | P | 14 | 24 | W | 6-24 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-12-26 | UNLV | 3 | W | 44-6 | UN | 58.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-0 | P | 13 | 1.5 | W | 20-3 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas State | 3 | L | 35-49 | OV | 62.5 | 0.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 13.5 | 2 | W | 28-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Houston Baptist | -39 | W | 63-14 | OV | 60 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 35-14 | OV | |
| 10-01-26 | @ Tulsa | -3 | L | 45-44 | OV | 57 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 10-17 | UN | 28 |
| 10-10-26 | Charlotte | -27.5 | W | 50-10 | OV | 58 | -7 | PK | 10-3 | UN | 13.5 | -17 | W | 40-10 | OV | 31 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Navy | -3 | W | 49-39 | OV | 60 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 13.5 | -0.5 | W | 28-17 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-29-26 | Florida Atlantic | -15.5 | L | 48-41 | OV | 78.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 16.5 | -9 | L | 24-24 | OV | 40 |
| 11-07-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas A&M | 24 | 52.5 | 15.5 | | 12 | 6 | 4-1 / 0-3 | 3-2 / 1-2 | 2-3 / 1-2 | +27.2 / -20.3 | -26 / +8.5 |
| South Carolina | 27 | -6.5 | 15(3) | -3.5 | 17 | 15 | 3-2 / 2-1 | 2-3 / 2-1 | 4-1 / 2-1 | +17.6 / +1.7 | -17.5 / +8.5 |
The home team has won each of the last five meetings in this SEC matchup, with South Carolina covering the spread in each of the last four. The Aggies earned a 31-30 win in College Station last season, but the Gamecocks comfortably covered the spread as a three-score 'dog. South Carolina blew a 30-3 halftime lead as Texas A&M ended the game on a 28-0 run. There are a lot of similarities between this upcoming contest and last year's meeting, but the roles are reversed. Last year, South Carolina entered that contest on a four-game losing streak and the overall buzz around the Gamecocks was at its lowest (that was the biggest point spread South Carolina saw as a 'dog last season). Now, the shoe is on the other foot. Texas A&M is 1-4 straight-up, 2-3 against the spread in SEC play. The Aggies are probably close to their bottom at the moment, but coming off a bye, we're really struggling to justify South Carolina as a seven-point favorite. There's been almost nothing but good news coming out of Columbia over the past month, but a little bit of wind was taken out of the Gamecocks' sails when they lost starting running back Matthew Fuller for the rest of the regular season with an ankle injury. Fuller was averaging 5.6 yards per carry with six touchdowns, and had formed a nice 1-2 punch in the backfield with QB LaNorris Sellers. Just like the Gamecocks did last year, we expect the Aggies to have their backs against the wall coming out of the bye. South Carolina is playing some of its best football of the season, but this number is too high.
Play Texas A&M
| Texas A&M | 22.3 / 19.3 | +3 | 15 | 25 | -9.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| South Carolina | 35.7 / 22.7 | +13 | 17 | 12 | +3.5 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Texas A&M | 10-24 | @ Alabama | +13.5 | 49 | 20-31 | South Carolina | 10-31 | @ Oklahoma | +3.5 | 44 | 42-25 |
| | 10-17 | Citadel | -46.5 | 56 | 41-0 | | 10-24 | Tennessee. | -2.5 | 50.5 | 27-24 |
| | 10-10 | @ Missouri | +4.5 | 50.5 | 6-27 | | 10-10 | @ Florida | +10 | 59.5 | 38-19 |
|
| 11-15-25 | South Carolina | 30 | 50 | 15 | 33/121 | 16/31/1/267 | 0/0 |
| Texas A&M | 31 | -17 | 23 | 29/64 | 22/39/2/439 | 2/2 |
| Texas A&M |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-2 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Missouri State | -38.5 | W | 50-0 | UN | 53.5 | -10.5 | L | 9-0 | UN | 14 | -24.5 | L | 19-0 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Arizona State | -14.5 | W | 48-20 | OV | 51.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 17-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Kentucky | -17 | L | 21-31 | OV | 48.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -9.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ LSU | 8 | L | 6-35 | UN | 52.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 5.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Arkansas | -13.5 | W | 34-7 | UN | 51 | -3.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 9.5 | -7 | W | 24-7 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Missouri | 4.5 | L | 6-27 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 3-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Citadel | -46.5 | L | 41-0 | UN | 56 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 10-24-26 | @ Alabama | 13.5 | W | 20-31 | OV | 49 | 3.5 | W | 7-10 | OV | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 17-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| South Carolina |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:6-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Kent State | -35.5 | W | 57-0 | OV | 53 | -9.5 | L | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21 | W | 29-0 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Towson | -44.5 | L | 45-9 | UN | 57.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 17-3 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Mississippi St | -3.5 | L | 34-41 | OV | 60 | -0.5 | W | 13-0 | UN | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 23-14 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Alabama | 11.5 | L | 18-49 | OV | 53 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 7 | L | 10-35 | OV | 27 |
| 10-03-26 | Kentucky | -2.5 | L | 34-35 | OV | 53 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Florida | 10 | W | 38-19 | UN | 59.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | W | 17-10 | UN | 30.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Tennessee U | -2.5 | W | 27-24 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | L | 17-21 | OV | 25.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Oklahoma | 3.5 | W | 42-25 | OV | 44 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 2 | W | 28-10 | OV | 22.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Alabama | 28 | 54 | 6 | | 6 | 16 | 4-1 / 2-1 | 2-3 / 2-1 | 4-1 / 2-1 | +18.2 / +15 | -14.5 / -7.5 |
| LSU | 31 | -6 | 9(3) | PK | 9 | 17 | 5-0 / 1-2 | 3-2 / 1-2 | 3-2 / 2-1 | +36.2 / +4 | -25 / -6.5 |
Alabama has won-and-covered each of the last three meetings, but there's a new sheriff in Baton Rouge and the Bayou Bengals look a little different under Lane Kiffin compared to the Brian Kelly days. The Crimson Tide earned a 20-9 home win in Tuscaloosa last season. All three wins in this current streak have come by double digits. Both teams are coming off bye weeks, so both had extra time to rest and prep for this one. Alabama was dealing with several health issues prior to the break. Star wide receiver Ryan Coleman-Williams, preseason All-American cornerback Zabien Brown, center Racin Delgatty and defensive tackle Terrance Green all missed time over the last month with injuries. In his Monday press conference, Alabama head coach Kalen DeBoer said all were "headed in a good direction." The Crimson Tide earned a 31-20 home win over Texas A&M before the break, but Alabama has failed to cover the spread in each of its last three games. LSU rebounded nicely from its one-point loss at Kentucky with a pair of spread covers against Mississippi State and Auburn. Neither team has found the right dance partner in recent weeks, but we believe Alabama and LSU are going to produce points. Yes, coaching staffs and players have changed over the years, but the Crimson Tide have had no problem finding the scoreboard in this series. Over the last seven meetings, Alabama has scored an average of 35.9 points per game against LSU. Even though Alabama's Keelon Russell has been very good this season, we're still talking about a player that's making his fourth career start on the road. He's going to make plays, but there's also a good chance he gifts LSU some points. Russell has four interceptions in three road games thus far. This game is going to be defined by explosive plays, not four-yard handoffs. There's too much speed and offensive talent for this total to be in the low-50s, in our opinion.
Play the Over
| Alabama | 19.3 / 22 | -2.7 | 5 | 10 | -8 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| LSU | 34.3 / 17.3 | +17 | 10 | 18 | -11 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 2-0 |
| Alabama | 10-24 | Texas A&M | -13.5 | 49 | 31-20 | LSU | 10-24 | @ Auburn | -7 | 52 | 38-17 |
| | 10-17 | @ Tennessee. | -7.5 | 50 | 10-26 | | 10-17 | Mississip. | -17.5 | 56.5 | 31-0 |
| | 10-10 | Georgia | -2.5 | 52 | 17-20 | | 10-10 | @ Kentucky | -9 | 50.5 | 34-35 |
|
| 11-08-25 | LSU | 9 | 49.5 | 13 | 25/60 | 23/32/0/173 | 3/2 |
| Alabama | 20 | -10 | 17 | 23/59 | 22/36/0/288 | 1/1 |
| 11-09-24 | Alabama | 42 | -2.5 | 23 | 48/311 | 12/18/0/109 | 1/0 |
| LSU | 13 | 59.5 | 22 | 24/104 | 27/42/2/239 | 1/1 |
| Alabama |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:6-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | East Carolina | -28 | W | 48-10 | OV | 52.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -16.5 | W | 38-7 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Kentucky | -9 | W | 45-17 | OV | 47.5 | -3 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10 | -5.5 | L | 13-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Florida State | -18 | L | 50-36 | OV | 50.5 | -6.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 10.5 | -10.5 | L | 26-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Carolina | -11.5 | W | 49-18 | OV | 53 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 10.5 | -7 | W | 35-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Mississippi St | -5.5 | W | 56-23 | OV | 63 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -2.5 | W | 28-17 | OV | 31.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Georgia | -2.5 | L | 17-20 | UN | 52 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-10 | UN | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tennessee U | -7.5 | L | 10-26 | UN | 50 | -2.5 | L | 0-9 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 10-12 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Texas A&M | -13.5 | L | 31-20 | OV | 49 | -3.5 | L | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 17-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Chattanooga | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Auburn | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| LSU |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:7-1 , PSR:5-1-1 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Clemson | -10 | W | 51-10 | OV | 49 | -3 | W | 17-3 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 31-3 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Louisiana Tech | -34.5 | L | 45-14 | OV | 55 | -9.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -21.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Mississippi | -3 | L | 24-32 | UN | 59 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-24 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Texas A&M | -8 | W | 35-6 | UN | 52.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -5.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | McNeese State | -54 | L | 63-14 | OV | 62.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-0 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | @ Kentucky | -9 | L | 34-35 | OV | 50.5 | -3 | PK | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 17-21 | OV | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | Mississippi St | -17.5 | W | 31-0 | UN | 56.5 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -10 | W | 21-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Auburn | -7 | W | 38-17 | OV | 52 | -1.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | -4 | W | 31-10 | OV | 26.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Charlotte | 19 | 47.5 | 48 | | 50 | 35 | 0-4 / 1-3 | 1-3 / 3-1 | 3-1 / 2-2 | -21.8 / -17.5 | +3.5 / +26.5 |
| UAB | 23 | -7.5 | 38(1) | -11 | 40 | 34 | 4-0 / 0-4 | 2-2 / 1-2-1 | 0-4 / 1-3 | +10.5 / -17.8 | -7.5 / +14 |
Charlotte earned a 29-27 home win over the Blazers in 2024, but these American Conference foes did not play last season. All four meetings between these teams have stayed under the total. Charlotte is enjoying a surprising late-season turnaround for second-year head coach Tim Albin. Following the 49ers' 59-8 home loss to Memphis on October 3, Charlotte's student newspaper published the headline, "Charlotte football's Albin era hits rock bottom." Well, if that was rock bottom (and it feels like it was), then Albin has done a nice job digging out of it. After the 49ers' upset win over Temple as a 17.5-point 'dog, Charlotte followed up that impressive effort by taking Tulane to overtime last week. QB Conner Harrell missed three games earlier this season, but he's found a way to light a spark the last two weeks against the Owls and Green Wave. We're big fans of the job that UAB coach Alex Mortensen is doing in Birmingham, but the Blazers are not a team that we're looking to lay points with. UAB has already cleared its projected season win total (3.5), but the Blazers are 0-2 against the spread as a favorite this season, never really threating to cover at any point against UL-Monroe and FCS-level Samford. UAB's last seven games have all stayed under the total, and that's not something you want to see when you need a team to win by double digits. If Harrell can continue his strong run of play, the 49ers can earn their third-straight cover.
Play Charlotte
| Charlotte | 26.3 / 39.7 | -13.3 | 52 | 35 | +17.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| UAB | 17.7 / 28.3 | -10.7 | 39 | 32 | +9 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Charlotte | 10-30 | Tulane | +7.5 | 47 | 31-38 | UAB | 10-31 | @ South Flo. | +7.5 | 43.5 | 10-30 |
| | 10-17 | @ Temple | +17 | 47 | 38-31 | | 10-15 | East Caro. | +4.5 | 49 | 30-17 |
| | 10-10 | @ North Tex. | +27.5 | 58 | 10-50 | | 10-10 | @ Memphis | +15 | 55 | 13-38 |
|
| 11-30-24 | UAB | 27 | -1 | 27 | 35/128 | 28/42/1/309 | 2/0 |
| Charlotte | 29 | 60 | 19 | 35/140 | 9/26/0/215 | 0/0 |
| Charlotte |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-7 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:0-6 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:2-6 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Citadel | -20.5 | L | 41-43 | OV | 49 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 14-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Mississippi | 44 | W | 9-41 | UN | 59.5 | 13.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 14.5 | 27.5 | W | 0-27 | UN | 35 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Appalachian St | 16.5 | W | 21-26 | UN | 52.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-13 | UN | 27 |
| 09-26-26 | Louisiana | 9 | L | 7-34 | UN | 49 | 2.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 5.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Memphis | 18.5 | L | 8-59 | OV | 52 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 13.5 | 10.5 | L | 0-24 | UN | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ North Texas | 27.5 | L | 10-50 | OV | 58 | 7 | PK | 3-10 | UN | 13.5 | 17 | L | 10-40 | OV | 31 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Temple | 17 | W | 38-31 | OV | 47 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 10 | W | 7-14 | UN | 24 |
| 10-30-26 | Tulane | 7.5 | W | 31-38 | OV | 47 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 5.5 | W | 24-14 | OV | 23.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Tulsa | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UAB |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:1-7-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-6 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-2-1 |
| 09-03-26 | @ Illinois | 25.5 | W | 23-42 | OV | 54 | 7 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 14.5 | W | 13-21 | OV | 28.5 |
| 09-12-26 | UL Monroe | -9 | L | 26-20 | UN | 53.5 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13 | -6 | L | 10-17 | P | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Louisiana | 7 | PK | 14-21 | UN | 55.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 12.5 | 3.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-25-26 | Navy | 6.5 | W | 24-20 | UN | 50 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 17-13 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Samford | -31 | L | 33-14 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 10-7 | OV | | | L | 13-14 | OV | |
| 10-10-26 | @ Memphis | 15 | L | 13-38 | UN | 55 | 3.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 8.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-15-26 | East Carolina | 4.5 | W | 30-17 | UN | 49 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 3-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ South Florida | 7.5 | L | 10-30 | UN | 43.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 7.5 | 4 | L | 10-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Tex San Antonio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ North Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Western Kentucky | 31 | -2 | 43.5 | -3 | 42 | 42 | 2-1 / 1-4 | 2-1 / 2-3 | 2-1 / 2-3 | +17.3 / -26.2 | -13.5 / +17.5 |
| Middle Tenn St | 28 | 53.5 | 47.5(1) | | 47 | 45 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 2-2 | +4.5 / -16 | -4.5 / +12.5 |
Western Kentucky has won-and-covered each of the last five meetings, including a 42-26 home win over the Blue Raiders last season. During this run, the Hilltoppers have out-scored MTSU by an average of 22.0 points per game. Any kind of momentum that Western Kentucky was building after back-to-back wins over Missouri State and Sam Houston was promptly lost in a 35-21 thrashing at the hands of Delaware last week. The Hilltoppers now have two losses in conference play and still have to play Jacksonville State and Liberty on the horizon. The same is largely true at Middle Tennessee, where momentum that was gained after a pair of upset wins over Florida International and Delaware quickly disappeared while giving up 44 points to Kennesaw last week. Neither team can be trusted. Neither team is playing for much at the moment, which is especially rare for WKU considering the Hilltoppers are routinely challenging for the C-USA crown. You're dealing with two Jekyll and Hyde teams, but we can only look toward the over. Middle Tennessee's last four games have all gone over the total. Both offenses may throw the kitchen sink at this game. Both defenses may be ready to wave the white flag on the season. This one could be entertaining, but not in a "this is quality football" kind of way.
Play the Over
| Western Kentucky | 23.7 / 17 | +6.7 | 43 | 44 | -0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Middle Tenn St | 29 / 32.3 | -3.3 | 47 | 44 | +4 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Western Kentucky | 10-27 | Delaware | -2.5 | 55.5 | 21-35 | Middle Tenn St | 10-28 | Kennesaw . | +1 | 49.5 | 28-44 |
| | 10-14 | @ Sam Houst. | PK | 53.5 | 16-3 | | 10-20 | @ Florida I. | +10 | 46.5 | 26-23 |
| | 10-08 | Missouri . | +2 | 56.5 | 34-13 | | 10-13 | Delaware | +1 | 49.5 | 33-30 |
|
| 11-15-25 | Middle Tenn St | 26 | 51.5 | 20 | 25/152 | 25/42/0/389 | 0/0 |
| Western Kentucky | 42 | -13.5 | 29 | 38/271 | 29/41/1/371 | 0/0 |
| Western Kentucky |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Nevada | 0 | L | 14-49 | OV | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | L | 7-21 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ Georgia | 40.5 | L | 20-70 | OV | 55.5 | 10 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14 | 24.5 | L | 6-49 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Indiana | 44.5 | W | 0-38 | UN | 58 | 13.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 14.5 | 26.5 | W | 0-14 | UN | 34.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Mercyhurst | -40 | W | 52-7 | OV | 58.5 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 10-01-26 | @ New Mexico State | 2 | L | 13-34 | UN | 56 | 0.5 | L | 3-6 | UN | 13.5 | 0.5 | L | 6-20 | UN | 28 |
| 10-08-26 | Missouri State | 2 | W | 34-13 | UN | 56.5 | 0 | W | 7-3 | UN | 12.5 | 0.5 | W | 21-6 | UN | 28 |
| 10-14-26 | @ Sam Houston St | 0 | W | 16-3 | UN | 53.5 | 0 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0 | W | 10-3 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-27-26 | Delaware | -2.5 | L | 21-35 | OV | 55.5 | 0 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -0.5 | L | 21-28 | OV | 28 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Middle Tenn St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Murray State | -22.5 | W | 38-14 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 21-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Marshall | 11.5 | W | 26-28 | UN | 56 | 5.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | 7 | W | 13-14 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Nevada | 3.5 | W | 27-20 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 7 | L | 13-23 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 7-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Kansas | 21.5 | L | 0-55 | OV | 51 | 6.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 11.5 | L | 0-20 | UN | 26 |
| 10-13-26 | Delaware | 1 | W | 33-30 | OV | 49.5 | 0.5 | W | 5-3 | UN | 9.5 | 0 | L | 12-16 | OV | 24 |
| 10-20-26 | @ Florida Intl | 10 | W | 26-23 | OV | 46.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-8 | OV | 7.5 | 6.5 | W | 13-8 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-28-26 | Kennesaw State | 1 | L | 28-44 | OV | 49.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | L | 17-19 | OV | 24.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Temple | 20 | 55.5 | 39.5 | | 37 | 36 | 1-4 / 1-2 | 2-3 / 2-1 | 2-3 / 1-2 | -3.8 / -1.7 | -1.5 / +4.5 |
| Navy | 24 | -7.5 | 33(1) | -7.5 | 30 | 3 | 2-1 / 0-4 | 1-2 / 1-3 | 3-0 / 2-2 | +8.3 / -5.3 | -10.5 / -1 |
Navy has won five of the last six meetings, but Temple comfortably stayed within the number as a 9.5-point home 'dog last season. The Owls have already faced Army earlier this year (21-17 loss), so they do have some recent experience against the triple option, and Temple has faced Navy each of the last six years so there is plenty of familiarity between the programs. Temple's had one of those, "When it rains, it pours..." stretches of the season. Emerging tight end Peter Clarke suffered a broken leg in last week's loss to East Carolina. Clarke caught ten balls for 215 yards with two touchdowns over the Owls' previous two games against UConn and Charlotte before going down against the Pirates. Navy returns home after dropping three-straight games to UTSA, North Texas and Notre Dame. This date with Temple represents a steep drop in class compared to what the Midshipmen have faced over the last month. If you're worried about Navy having any kind of hangover or letdown after playing Notre Dame, that hasn't been an issue in the past. In 2022, Navy upset UCF as a 14.5-point 'dog the week after playing Notre Dame. Last season, Navy upset South Florida as a 9.5-point 'dog the week after playing Notre Dame. We're struggling to justify a total in the mid-50s. When Temple played Army at the end of September, the closing total was a touchdown lower than what we're seeing this week. Four of Temple's last five games have stayed under the total, they already have experience defending the option this season and the Owls just lost their starting tight end. So we're struggling to justify why this total is on the rise.
Play the Under
11/02 12:46 PM PST — Emerging tight end Peter Clarke suffered a broken leg in last week's loss to East Carolina. Clarke caught ten balls for 215 yards with two touchdowns over the Owls' previous two games against UConn and Charlotte before going down against the Pirates.
| Temple | 20 / 29.7 | -9.7 | 37 | 42 | -5.5 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Navy | 28.7 / 40.7 | -12 | 33 | 21 | +13 | 0-1 / 0-1 | 0-1 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Temple | 10-31 | @ East Caro. | +4 | 51.5 | 9-17 | Navy | 10-31 | Notre Dame | +31 | 54 | 13-35 |
| | 10-17 | Charlotte | -17 | 47 | 31-38 | | 10-24 | North Tex. | +3 | 60 | 39-49 |
| | 10-10 | Connectic. | -3.5 | 55.5 | 20-34 | | 10-17 | @ Tex San A. | +5.5 | 53 | 34-38 |
|
| 10-11-25 | Navy | 32 | -10 | 15 | 37/243 | 6/17/0/141 | 1/0 |
| Temple | 31 | 52.5 | 27 | 40/173 | 25/36/0/345 | 1/1 |
| Temple |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-6 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Rhode Island | -14.5 | W | 38-14 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 10-7 | OV | | | W | 24-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Penn State | 24 | W | 9-27 | UN | 49.5 | 6.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | W | 3-10 | UN | 27 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Toledo | 4.5 | W | 48-49 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 9.5 | 3 | W | 24-14 | OV | 24 |
| 09-25-26 | Army | 3.5 | L | 17-21 | UN | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 2.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Florida | 5 | W | 17-13 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Connecticut | -3.5 | L | 20-34 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 10.5 | -3 | L | 17-24 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Charlotte | -17 | L | 31-38 | OV | 47 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -10 | L | 14-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | @ East Carolina | 4 | L | 9-17 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 3 | L | 3-10 | UN | 26 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | UAB | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-19-26 | Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Navy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:2-6 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:1-7 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Towson | -31.5 | L | 42-15 | OV | 50.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-12 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | -4.5 | L | 30-38 | OV | 59.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | -3 | L | 7-31 | OV | 30.5 |
| 09-25-26 | @ UAB | -6.5 | L | 20-24 | UN | 50 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 13-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Air Force | 2.5 | L | 9-14 | UN | 45.5 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Tulsa | -3 | W | 34-26 | OV | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 14-20 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | 5.5 | W | 34-38 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | W | 20-21 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-24-26 | North Texas | 3 | L | 39-49 | OV | 60 | 0.5 | L | 3-14 | OV | 13.5 | 0.5 | L | 17-28 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Notre Dame | 31 | W | 13-35 | UN | 54 | 7.5 | W | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | 18.5 | W | 13-14 | UN | 30.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Memphis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Charlotte | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Missouri State | 27 | 49.5 | 45.5 | | 46 | 50 | 3-1 / 0-4 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 1-3 | +13 / -26 | -4 / +17.5 |
| Florida Intl | 24 | -4.5 | 42(2) | -5.5 | 41 | 31 | 3-1 / 0-4 | 2-2 / 1-2-1 | 2-2 / 2-2 | +11.5 / -14.5 | -15.5 / +9 |
Missouri State earned a 28-21 home win over the Panthers last season, covering the spread as a 3.5-point favorite. The Bears had extra time to prep for this one after beating Sam Houston last Thursday. We continue to be mildly impressed with the improvement of Missouri State's offense with Duke transfer Henry Belin IV running the show. He missed time earlier this season, but the Bears have scored an average of 28.7 points per game with him running the show over the last three weeks. Belin IV is completing 67.5-percent of his passes thus far. Few things should come as a surprise in Conference-USA, but Florida International losing to Liberty by 39 points last week was certainly one of them. The Flames were up 42-0 with five minutes remaining in the third quarter, and probably could have made that final score look real ugly if they wanted to. That was a shocking result for Florida International, who has traditionally played clean, disciplined football under head coach Willie Simmons. That result came one week after FIU lost outright as a 10.5-point home favorite against Middle Tennessee. The Panthers are 1-5 against the spread over the last six games. The team that showed so much promise during the first month of the season is nowhere to be found at the moment.
Play Missouri State
| Missouri State | 28.7 / 28.3 | +0.3 | 47 | 46 | 0 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Florida Intl | 19 / 34 | -15 | 41 | 38 | +2.5 | 0-1 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 0-1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Missouri State | 10-27 | Sam Houst. | -5.5 | 51.5 | 24-3 | Florida Intl | 10-31 | @ Liberty | +14 | 45.5 | 10-49 |
| | 10-20 | @ Delaware | +3 | 54.5 | 38-61 | | 10-20 | Middle Te. | -10 | 46.5 | 23-26 |
| | 10-14 | Kennesaw . | +2.5 | 53 | 24-21 | | 10-13 | @ Jacksonvi. | +3 | 44 | 24-27 |
|
| 10-29-25 | Florida Intl | 21 | 50.5 | 23 | 35/137 | 22/36/0/231 | 2/2 |
| Missouri State | 28 | -3 | 18 | 34/229 | 16/27/0/163 | 2/1 |
| Missouri State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Texas A&M | 38.5 | L | 0-50 | UN | 53.5 | 10.5 | W | 0-9 | UN | 14 | 24.5 | W | 0-19 | UN | 30.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Lindenwood | -16.5 | W | 48-14 | OV | 53.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 34-0 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Marshall | 4 | L | 24-30 | OV | 52.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 10.5 | 2.5 | L | 10-17 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ SMU | 30.5 | W | 24-34 | UN | 59.5 | 7.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 14.5 | 19.5 | W | 10-14 | UN | 33.5 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Western Kentucky | -2 | L | 13-34 | UN | 56.5 | 0 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -0.5 | L | 6-21 | UN | 28 |
| 10-14-26 | Kennesaw State | 2.5 | W | 24-21 | UN | 53 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 6-7 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-20-26 | @ Delaware | 3 | L | 38-61 | OV | 54.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | 1.5 | W | 28-24 | OV | 27 |
| 10-27-26 | Sam Houston St | -5.5 | W | 24-3 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 26 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florida Intl |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:4-2-1 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ South Florida | 14.5 | W | 9-19 | UN | 53.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-6 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Buffalo U | -8 | W | 33-20 | OV | 47.5 | -3 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10 | -5.5 | W | 21-6 | OV | 24 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Florida Atlantic | 5 | L | 10-16 | UN | 62.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 3 | PK | 7-10 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Long Island | -37.5 | L | 20-3 | UN | 54 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 14-3 | OV | |
| 10-07-26 | New Mexico State | -7 | W | 22-3 | UN | 47 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4 | W | 10-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-13-26 | @ Jacksonville St | 3 | PK | 24-27 | OV | 44 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 17-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-20-26 | Middle Tenn St | -10 | L | 23-26 | OV | 46.5 | -2.5 | L | 8-7 | OV | 7.5 | -6.5 | L | 8-13 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Liberty | 14 | L | 10-49 | OV | 45.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 7.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-28 | OV | 23.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Louisiana Tech | 31 | -7 | 33.5 | -7.5 | 37 | 42 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 4-0 | 3-1 / 2-2 | +25.8 / -2.3 | -15.5 / +9 |
| Troy | 20 | 47.5 | 42(1) | | 39 | 28 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 1-3 / 2-2 | 1-3 / 0-4 | +8.5 / -11.3 | -15.5 / +12.5 |
Shockingly (we think?), the Trojans and Bulldogs have never taken the field before. Only a seven-hour drive and a straight shot across I20 separates Troy from Ruston, which makes it surprising that these regional foes have never crossed paths. Troy had two extra days to prep for this one after beating James Madison as a 17.5-point underdog last Thursday. The under has cashed in seven of the Trojans' eight games this season. Louisiana Tech will be making back-to-back trips to Alabama after beating South Alabama in Mobile last week. The Bulldogs are roughly a field goal away from being 8-0 against the spread this season (beat Louisiana by one as a 3.5-point favorite). We tip our cap to the Trojans for the inspired effort last week, but Louisiana Tech is operating like a buzzsaw at the moment. The Bulldogs have allowed a total of 20 points across the last three games. Troy has simply been too inconsistent on a week-to-week basis. The Trojans went from scoring 55 points against Southern Miss to scoring six points against Louisiana the following game. Troy lost outright as a 13.5-point home favorite against UL-Monroe, allowing the WarHawks to break a 14-game losing streak. As we saw last week against James Madison, Troy's best effort is good enough to compete with anyone in the Sun Belt. But we've only seen that version of Troy about three times in eight games this season.
Play Louisiana Tech
| Louisiana Tech | 28.3 / 6.7 | +21.7 | 35 | 46 | -11 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Troy | 14.7 / 25 | -10.3 | 39 | 39 | +2.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 0-2 |
| Louisiana Tech | 10-31 | @ South Ala. | -6 | 58 | 35-20 | Troy | 10-29 | @ James Mad. | +17.5 | 52 | 24-21 |
| | 10-24 | Old Domin. | -13.5 | 44 | 26-0 | | 10-24 | UL Monroe | -13 | 51.5 | 14-21 |
| | 10-17 | @ UL Monroe | -13.5 | 56 | 24-0 | | 10-17 | @ Louisiana | +3 | 49.5 | 6-33 |
| Louisiana Tech |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:7-1 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-2 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Northwestern State | -44.5 | W | 80-6 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 21-3 | OV | | | W | 63-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ LSU | 34.5 | W | 14-45 | OV | 55 | 9.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 21.5 | W | 7-10 | UN | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Baylor | 20.5 | W | 19-36 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 12.5 | 11.5 | L | 7-20 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Army | 0 | W | 31-29 | OV | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | W | 14-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Louisiana | -3 | L | 32-31 | OV | 48 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 13-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-17-26 | @ UL Monroe | -13.5 | W | 24-0 | UN | 56 | -3.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | -7.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 29 |
| 10-24-26 | Old Dominion | -13.5 | W | 26-0 | UN | 44 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -7 | W | 17-0 | UN | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | @ South Alabama | -6 | W | 35-20 | UN | 58 | -0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 12.5 | -3 | W | 28-20 | OV | 29.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Troy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | So Mississippi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Troy |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:1-7-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Sam Houston St | -15.5 | L | 24-21 | UN | 52.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | -9.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama St | -23.5 | L | 34-17 | UN | 52.5 | | W | 14-7 | OV | | | W | 31-7 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Missouri | 26.5 | W | 17-27 | UN | 49.5 | 7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | 15 | W | 17-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Utah State | 3 | L | 10-21 | UN | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 1.5 | W | 10-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-06-26 | So Mississippi | -9.5 | W | 55-34 | OV | 51.5 | -3.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 10.5 | -6.5 | W | 31-7 | OV | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Louisiana | 3 | L | 6-33 | UN | 49.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-19 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | UL Monroe | -13 | L | 14-21 | UN | 51.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | L | 7-3 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-29-26 | @ James Madison | 17.5 | W | 24-21 | UN | 52 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 10 | L | 7-21 | OV | 26.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ South Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Georgia Southern | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Arkansas St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Liberty | 38 | -14.5 | 27 | -16 | 32 | 41 | 4-0 / 3-1 | 3-1 / 3-1 | 2-2 / 1-3 | +27 / +13.5 | -17.5 / -3 |
| New Mexico State | 10 | 46.5 | 45(2) | | 46 | 37 | 2-2 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 1-3 | +2.5 / -10 | -4 / +10.5 |
Liberty has won each of the last four meetings, but New Mexico State has been a thorn in the Flames' side the past two years. The Aggies comfortably covered the spread as a double-digit 'dog in the last two meetings, only losing by three in Lynchburg last season. Traveling to Las Cruces is certainly not easy, but this version of the Flames looks a lot different than recent editions. Liberty earned a 49-10 home win over Florida International last week, and that final score could have been worse. The Flames held a 42-0 lead with five minutes remaining in the third quarter before emptying the benches. Liberty has out-scored its first four conference opponents by a combined margin of 144-33. The Flames have covered the spread in each of their last six games. Contests like this have provided a roadblock for Liberty in past seasons, but Jamey Chadwell has this team playing at a different level than the rest of the conference. New Mexico State was just shut-out at home last week against Jacksonville State. The Aggies giving Liberty problems each of the last two seasons will likely only add to the Flames' focus and preparation this week. We have no interest in stepping in front of that train right now.
Play Liberty
| Liberty | 39.3 / 6.3 | +33 | 32 | 43 | -12 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| New Mexico State | 11 / 23.3 | -12.3 | 45 | 42 | +2.5 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Liberty | 10-31 | Florida I. | -14 | 45.5 | 49-10 | New Mexico State | 10-28 | Jacksonvi. | +3 | 50 | 0-24 |
| | 10-22 | @ Kennesaw . | -8 | 50 | 34-6 | | 10-21 | @ Sam Houst. | -3 | 47 | 30-24 |
| | 10-08 | Sam Houst. | -13.5 | 52.5 | 35-3 | | 10-07 | @ Florida I. | +7 | 47 | 3-22 |
|
| 10-14-25 | New Mexico State | 27 | 48 | 23 | 38/146 | 20/37/0/242 | 2/2 |
| Liberty | 30 | -11.5 | 19 | 30/114 | 20/30/2/179 | 1/1 |
| Liberty |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ James Madison | 6 | L | 13-20 | UN | 51 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 6-17 | UN | 25.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Gardner Webb | -28.5 | L | 24-23 | UN | 54.5 | | W | 14-6 | OV | | | L | 17-20 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | Ball State | -14.5 | W | 51-15 | OV | 49.5 | -4.5 | W | 13-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 23-7 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-24-26 | @ Coastal Carolina | -2.5 | W | 34-17 | OV | 50 | -0.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | L | 10-17 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-02-26 | @ Delaware | -7 | W | 30-14 | UN | 51.5 | -0.5 | W | 6-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4 | W | 20-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-08-26 | Sam Houston St | -13.5 | W | 35-3 | UN | 52.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27 |
| 10-22-26 | @ Kennesaw State | -8 | W | 34-6 | UN | 50 | -2.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -5.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-31-26 | Florida Intl | -14 | W | 49-10 | OV | 45.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 7.5 | -7.5 | W | 28-0 | OV | 23.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ New Mexico State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| New Mexico State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ Florida State | 31 | W | 17-34 | UN | 53.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-3 | UN | 12.5 | 18.5 | W | 7-17 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Mercyhurst | -29 | W | 51-14 | OV | 52.5 | | W | 13-7 | OV | | | W | 23-14 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Hawaii | 7.5 | L | 19-29 | UN | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-9 | UN | 10 | 4 | L | 13-19 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | New Mexico | 11.5 | L | 18-42 | OV | 47.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 7 | L | 3-14 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-01-26 | Western Kentucky | -2 | W | 34-13 | UN | 56 | -0.5 | W | 6-3 | UN | 13.5 | -0.5 | W | 20-6 | UN | 28 |
| 10-07-26 | @ Florida Intl | 7 | L | 3-22 | UN | 47 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 4 | L | 3-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-21-26 | @ Sam Houston St | -3 | W | 30-24 | OV | 47 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -1 | W | 14-10 | OV | 23 |
| 10-28-26 | Jacksonville St | 3 | L | 0-24 | UN | 50 | 0.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 1.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Liberty | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kentucky | 20 | 49 | 16 | | 18 | 22 | 4-1 / 3-0 | 4-1 / 3-0 | 3-1 / 2-1 | +9.2 / +6.3 | -7 / +9 |
| Tennessee U | 23 | -6.5 | 11.5(3) | -7.5 | 12 | 18 | 4-1 / 2-1 | 3-2 / 1-2 | 0-5 / 2-1 | +20.6 / +8.3 | -15.5 / -8 |
Tennessee has won each of the last five meetings, including a 56-34 road win in Lexington last season. Something tells us we won't be seeing quite that many points in Knoxville on Saturday. Both teams are coming off a bye. Kentucky has won-and-covered each of its last six games since falling to Alabama in Week 2. Kentucky running back CJ Baxter is expected to return this week. Baxter missed the game against Oklahoma and was only able to generate one catch and one rushing attempt against Vanderbilt with an injured shoulder. Baxter has eight touchdowns this season while producing 5.5 yards per carry. Tennessee had a week to recover from falling at South Carolina in a heartbreaker. There aren't too many quarterbacks that can do what LaNorris Sellers can for the Gamecocks, but Kentucky's staff has to be somewhat encouraged by the success that Sellers and South Carolina had against Tennessee's defense. Over the prior four weeks, the Vols allowed an average of 15.3 points per game. Sellers and the Gamecocks generated 5.5 yards per play, and that's a blueprint that Kentucky QB Kenny Minchey can follow. Also, the rest of the SEC was largely unfamiliar with Tennessee's first-year defensive coordinator Jim Knowles. Knowles has never coached in the SEC before and spent the last eight seasons at Oklahoma State, Ohio State and Penn State. Well, Kentucky's Will Stein is one of the few coaches in the SEC that has gameplanned for a Knowles-led defense in the past because they were both in the Big Ten for the last three seasons. Stein's Oregon team beat Knowles' Penn State team in Happy Valley last season. In a game that is likely going to be a low-scoring slugfest, we will gladly take the 6.5-point head start with the Wildcats.
Play Kentucky
11/03 11:07 AM PST — Kentucky running back CJ Baxter is expected to return this week. Baxter missed the game against Oklahoma and was only able to generate one catch and one rushing attempt against Vanderbilt with an injured shoulder.
| Kentucky | 30 / 21.3 | +8.7 | 17 | 14 | +2 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-0 / 0-1 |
| Tennessee U | 24.7 / 18 | +6.7 | 13 | 16 | -1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 0-1 / 1-1 |
| Kentucky | 10-24 | Vanderbilt | -9.5 | 51 | 34-17 | Tennessee U | 10-24 | @ South Car. | +2.5 | 50.5 | 24-27 |
| | 10-17 | @ Oklahoma | +7 | 44.5 | 21-13 | | 10-17 | Alabama | +7.5 | 50 | 26-10 |
| | 10-10 | LSU | +9 | 50.5 | 35-34 | | 10-10 | @ Arkansas | -13.5 | 51 | 24-17 |
|
| 10-25-25 | Tennessee U | 56 | -7.5 | 24 | 33/108 | 20/26/0/396 | 0/0 |
| Kentucky | 34 | 55 | 25 | 37/146 | 26/36/1/330 | 2/1 |
| Kentucky |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-1 , PSR:7-1 , O/U:5-2-1 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-2-1 , O/U:4-3-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Youngstown St | -22.5 | W | 45-13 | UN | 61.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 28-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | Alabama | 9 | L | 17-45 | OV | 47.5 | 3 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 5.5 | W | 17-13 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Texas A&M | 17 | W | 31-21 | OV | 48.5 | 3.5 | W | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | 9.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 09-26-26 | South Alabama | -20.5 | W | 45-21 | OV | 54.5 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11.5 | L | 24-21 | OV | 28 |
| 10-03-26 | @ South Carolina | 2.5 | W | 35-34 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 10.5 | 0.5 | L | 10-20 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | LSU | 9 | W | 35-34 | OV | 50.5 | 3 | PK | 7-10 | OV | 10.5 | 6.5 | W | 21-17 | OV | 26 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Oklahoma | 7 | W | 21-13 | UN | 44.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 7.5 | 4 | W | 7-10 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Vanderbilt | -9.5 | W | 34-17 | P | 51 | -3.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Tennessee U | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tennessee U |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:6-2 , PSR:3-3-1 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Furman | -49.5 | L | 56-9 | UN | 66.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 28-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Georgia Tech | -12.5 | W | 45-24 | OV | 55.5 | -3.5 | L | 7-10 | OV | 13 | -6.5 | W | 24-10 | OV | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Kennesaw State | -35 | L | 42-9 | UN | 60 | -9.5 | W | 15-3 | OV | 14.5 | -21.5 | L | 21-3 | UN | 34 |
| 09-26-26 | Texas | 5 | W | 17-20 | UN | 54.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | 3 | L | 3-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Auburn | -6 | W | 24-14 | UN | 54 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -3.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 27.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Arkansas | -13.5 | L | 24-17 | UN | 51 | -2.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | PK | 7-0 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Alabama | 7.5 | W | 26-10 | UN | 50 | 2.5 | W | 9-0 | UN | 10.5 | 4 | W | 12-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ South Carolina | 2.5 | L | 24-27 | OV | 50.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 21-17 | OV | 25.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 11/03 10:10 pm |
| Boise State | 46 | -16 | 19 | -26 | 21 | 32 | 4-0 / 3-1 | 1-3 / 3-1 | 4-0 / 2-2 | +13 / +11.5 | -17 / -1.5 |
| Colorado State | 30 | 69.5 | 48(3) | | 43 | 38 | 3-2 / 0-3 | 3-2 / 0-2-1 | 5-0 / 2-1 | +3 / -23.3 | +0.5 / +13 |
A year ago, a late-season injury to QB Maddux Madsen derailed any longshot hopes that the Broncos might have had to reach the 12-team playoff for a second consecutive year. Green backup QB Max Cutforth looked like a deer-in-the-headlights when he arrived in relief during a 30-7 loss to Fresno State, and the offense continued to struggle in a subsequent loss to San Diego State. Now, however, with some experience as the first-stringer, and after faring better in later November starts a year ago, Cutforth is more ready to come out of the bullpen, and in Aaron Ashby-like fashion relieved a hurting Madsen last week after Texas State had staged a breathless rally to reverse a 25-point deficit, fashioning his own breathtaking sequence with three TD passes in the fourth quarter as the Broncos survived a wild 46-45 shootout and stayed in the mix for the Group of 6 berth in the playoffs. After leaving the blue carpet on crutches last week, there’s no word yet on Madsen’s availability for this week, only for HC Spencer Danielson to say he’ll be "back here soon," but it’s obvious from a week ago that the Bronco offense is in good hands if needed with Cutforth. Now, the student body at Boise would have volunteers lining up to play against the Colorado State stop unit that ranks last nationally in both scoring (42.4 points per game!) and overall (526 yards per game!) defense and allowed the nation’s lowest-scoring team, Utah State, to put up 31 points last Saturday in Logan. Which might figure as Jim Mora is still searching for anyone with a defensive coaching resume to take over his defense after forcing coordinator Tyson Summers to walk the plank last month. Though we didn’t see as much of it last week against sage Bronco Mendenhall and his Aggies defense, the Rams have also shown they can move the ball and dent the dish, scoring nearly 36 ppg, and Oklahoma State transfer QB Hauss Hejny has recently returned to active duty and does have 14 TD passes in only about four-and-a-half games worth of work. Call us skittish if you wish, but laying well over two TDs on the road in November, even against a bad defense, when likely using a backup QB, looks a bit of a risk to us, and we might simply rather expect the sort of high-scoring game we’ve gotten used to seeing in the Pac-12 this fall, especially involving these two and the host Rams having posted seven straight “overs” in front of last week.
Play the Over
11/03 1:17 PM PST — Broncos QB Maddux Madsen was knocked out of last week's game vs. Texas State with a leg injury late in the third quarter and did not return to the game, instead seen using crutches on the sidelines in the fourth quarter. Backup QB Max Cutforth, who saw extensive action last November, fired three TD passes to steal a wild 46-45 win over the visiting Bobcats. Boise HC Spencer Danielson wasn't specific early in the week regarding the status of Madsen, other than intimating he'd be "back here soon," with no specific timetable. This news likely gets updated later in the week, though Cutforth's performance out of the bullpen should allay some of the fears in the Bronco fan base.
| Boise State | 38.3 / 28.7 | +9.7 | 20 | 32 | -11 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Colorado State | 32.3 / 48.7 | -16.3 | 46 | 37 | +8.5 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 0-2 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Boise State | 10-31 | Texas Sta. | -10 | 63.5 | 46-45 | Colorado State | 10-31 | @ Utah State | +9.5 | 59 | 14-31 |
| | 10-24 | @ Washingto. | -14.5 | 52.5 | 31-10 | | 10-24 | San Diego. | +1 | 57.5 | 56-49 |
| | 10-10 | @ Fresno St. | -9 | 48.5 | 38-31 | | 10-15 | @ Texas Sta. | +15.5 | 69.5 | 27-66 |
|
| 11-22-25 | Colorado State | 21 | 45.5 | 17 | 17/39 | 26/46/3/293 | 1/1 |
| Boise State | 49 | -17.5 | 32 | 52/279 | 23/35/0/254 | 2/1 |
| Boise State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-1 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:6-1 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:7-1 , PSR:5-2 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Oregon | 25.5 | W | 27-34 | OV | 53 | 7 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 14.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 28 |
| 09-12-26 | Memphis | -9.5 | W | 38-20 | OV | 55 | -3 | L | 3-7 | UN | 12.5 | -6 | L | 17-20 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-19-26 | South Dakota | -28.5 | L | 38-24 | OV | 61.5 | | 7-7 | OV | | | W | 21-14 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Western Michigan | -8 | W | 32-7 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 8-0 | UN | 9.5 | -4.5 | W | 15-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Utah State | -19.5 | L | 37-18 | OV | 51 | -6.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -11 | W | 28-10 | OV | 27 |
| 10-10-26 | @ Fresno State | -9 | L | 38-31 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 15-13 | OV | 9.5 | -4.5 | W | 25-20 | OV | 24 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Washington State | -14.5 | W | 31-10 | UN | 52.5 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7.5 | L | 10-7 | UN | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | Texas State | -10 | L | 46-45 | OV | 63.5 | -2.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -6 | W | 28-3 | UN | 32.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Colorado State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:7-1-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:6-1-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Wyoming | -2.5 | W | 35-13 | OV | 46 | -0.5 | W | 7-3 | OV | 9 | -0.5 | W | 14-6 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Southern Utah | -20.5 | W | 58-24 | OV | 57.5 | | W | 17-7 | OV | | | W | 48-21 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | BYU | 17.5 | L | 23-41 | OV | 55 | 4.5 | L | 7-21 | OV | 11.5 | 9.5 | L | 7-31 | OV | 28 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Tex San Antonio | 14 | PK | 45-59 | OV | 56.5 | 3.5 | L | 14-21 | OV | 13.5 | 7.5 | L | 21-35 | OV | 29.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Oregon State | 7 | L | 26-56 | OV | 61 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 4 | L | 14-35 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-15-26 | @ Texas State | 15.5 | L | 27-66 | OV | 69.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-21 | OV | 14.5 | 10 | L | 21-45 | OV | 36.5 |
| 10-24-26 | San Diego State | 1 | W | 56-49 | OV | 57.5 | 0.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 13.5 | 0 | W | 35-24 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Utah State | 9.5 | L | 14-31 | UN | 59 | 1.5 | L | 0-10 | UN | 13.5 | 5.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 30.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sam Houston St | 10 | 45.5 | 53 | | 48 | 47 | 1-3 / 0-4 | 2-2 / 1-3 | 2-2 / 1-3 | +8.5 / -22.8 | -1.5 / +17.5 |
| Jacksonville St | 34 | -17 | 35.5(2) | -19.5 | 37 | 45 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 3-0-1 / 1-3 | 3-1 / 2-2 | +14.8 / -0.8 | -9 / +0.5 |
Jacksonville State has won all three meetings since the Bearkats and Gamecocks joined Conference-USA. Sam Houston made the necessary move to fire head coach Phil Longo after last week's 24-3 loss at Missouri State. The Bearkats have failed to score a touchdown in three of their last four games. Sam Houston is 0-4 straight-up and against the spread in league play, getting out-scored by an average of 18.0 points per game. QB Landyn Locke is listed as questionable with an undisclosed injury. Locke was a somewhat-surprising scratch before last week's game against Missouri State as back-up DJ Bailey was thrust into the starting role. Bailey went 20-of-35 for 258 passing yards, but didn't get any help from the Bearkats' rushing attack as SHSU finished with 26 rushing yards against the Bears. Bailey was sacked five times, the Bearkats committed ten penalties and SHSU was only able to generate 4.7 yards per play against a defense that allowed 61 points the week prior. Any case to be made for a "new coach bump" or anything like that can probably only be attributed to the defense, perhaps signalling a play on the under if that unit shows up with a little more fire in its belly. But this Bearkats' offense is simply broken right now. Longo was supposed to be an offensive guru that could build a passing attack, but we haven't seen the Bearkats produce anything through the air over the last two months.
Play Jacksonville State
11/02 2:11 PM PST — Sam Houston QB Landyn Locke is listed as questionable with an undisclosed injury. Locke was a somewhat-surprising scratch before last week's game against Missouri State as back-up DJ Bailey was thrust into the starting role.
| Sam Houston St | 10 / 23.3 | -13.3 | 48 | 45 | +3 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| Jacksonville St | 26 / 16.7 | +9.3 | 37 | 43 | -3 | 1-0 / 2-0 | 0-0-1 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 |
| Sam Houston St | 10-27 | @ Missouri . | +5.5 | 51.5 | 3-24 | Jacksonville St | 10-28 | @ New Mexic. | -3 | 50 | 24-0 |
| | 10-21 | New Mexic. | +3 | 47 | 24-30 | | 10-13 | Florida I. | -3 | 44 | 27-24 |
| | 10-14 | Western K. | PK | 53.5 | 3-16 | | 10-07 | @ Kennesaw . | -3 | 48.5 | 27-26 |
|
| 10-09-25 | Jacksonville St | 29 | -7 | 26 | 63/370 | 13/17/0/129 | 2/1 |
| Sam Houston St | 27 | 53.5 | 15 | 33/150 | 12/19/0/136 | 2/1 |
| 11-23-24 | Sam Houston St | 11 | 57.5 | 16 | 39/175 | 13/26/0/84 | 0/0 |
| Jacksonville St | 21 | -5.5 | 20 | 58/278 | 9/12/0/54 | 1/1 |
| Sam Houston St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:1-7 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:3-5-0 | 1Q SUR:3-4 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:1-6-0 | 1H SUR:2-5 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Troy | 15.5 | W | 21-24 | UN | 52.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 11.5 | 9.5 | W | 14-14 | OV | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Tulsa | 12.5 | W | 17-23 | UN | 51.5 | 3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | W | 14-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Nicholls State | -21 | W | 59-0 | OV | 51 | | W | 10-0 | OV | | | W | 31-0 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ Texas Tech | 34.5 | L | 14-49 | OV | 55.5 | 7.5 | W | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 20.5 | W | 14-21 | OV | 31 |
| 10-08-26 | @ Liberty | 13.5 | L | 3-35 | UN | 52.5 | 3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 7 | L | 3-14 | UN | 27 |
| 10-14-26 | Western Kentucky | 0 | L | 3-16 | UN | 53.5 | 0 | L | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 0 | L | 3-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-21-26 | New Mexico State | 3 | L | 24-30 | OV | 47 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 1 | L | 10-14 | OV | 23 |
| 10-27-26 | @ Missouri State | 5.5 | L | 3-24 | UN | 51.5 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 10.5 | 3.5 | L | 3-10 | UN | 26 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Jacksonville St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Kennesaw State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Middle Tenn St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Florida Intl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Jacksonville St |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:4-3-1 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:4-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:5-2-0 |
| 08-29-26 | @ North Dakota State | 6.5 | L | 7-33 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | OV | 10 | 3.5 | L | 7-17 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-05-26 | Eastern Kentucky | -22.5 | W | 49-7 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-7 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Ohio | 1.5 | L | 27-29 | OV | 49 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10 | 0.5 | W | 17-14 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-19-26 | Georgia Southern | -3.5 | W | 31-27 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-24 | OV | 26.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Middle Tenn St | -7 | W | 23-13 | UN | 50.5 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 10.5 | -4 | L | 10-7 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-07-26 | @ Kennesaw State | -3 | L | 27-26 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 10.5 | -1.5 | L | 14-16 | OV | 24.5 |
| 10-13-26 | Florida Intl | -3 | PK | 27-24 | OV | 44 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 17-17 | OV | 21.5 |
| 10-28-26 | @ New Mexico State | -3 | W | 24-0 | UN | 50 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -1.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 24.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Sam Houston St | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Western Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Missouri State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Delaware | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tech Play | | Updated: 11/03 9:09 pm |
| Air Force | 18 | 43 | 37 | | 35 | 38 | 4-1 / 2-1 | 4-1 / 1-2 | 3-2 / 1-2 | +10.4 / +3.3 | -7 / -6 |
| Army | 22 | -3.5 | 31.5(1) | -6.5 | 30 | 28 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 3-1 | +21.8 / -5.5 | -12 / +0.5 |
We’re glad to see CBS putting a spotlight on this clash, sending Adam Zucker, Rick Neuheisel and friends up to West Point for their Saturday pre-game show. Though these sides are getting involved in some uncharacteristic shootouts the past month (scorelines like 49-22, 38-35, 35-26, 41-31, and 56-24 the last three weeks alone), we’re sure that Neuheisel and friends will remind how the pace always slows for these Commander-in-Chief battles that keep old option devotees like Barry Switzer and ex-Falcon HC Ken Hatfield rapt with attention. (The late Lou Holtz also said these clashes were always among his most-favorite every season). Keep in mind that after Air Force and Navy played another grinder (14-9) last month in Colorado Springs, “unders” are now 49-14-1 in these service academy battles the past 21+ years. That includes the last 11 root canals between the Falcons and Black Knights, and no scoreline above 43 in that span (and none higher than 37 in ten of those eleven). Air Force, in particular, is adept at keeping the chains and clock moving as it has almost eschewed the forward pass altogether since QB Liam Szarka went down for the season with a knee vs. the Midshipmen last month. To wit: twice in the past four games, the Falcons haven’t completed a pass at all, including last week vs. UConn when Troy Calhoun, down both Szarka and backup Evan Medders, mostly rolled with battering-ram, 245-lb. ex-LB Kemper Hodges taking snaps as he did a few weeks ago vs. Northern Illinois, with Hodges bulldozing his way for 200 rushing yards in last week’s win over Jason Candle's Huskies. (So effective has Calhoun been with this no-pass style that the Tampa Bay Bucs are now keen to emulate!). By comparison, West Point tank driver Cale Hellums almost looks like Matthew Stafford by comparison, already almost equaling last year’s 87-pass output with four games still to play, but these two can’t seem to help themselves as these clashes inevitably turn into “my option is better than yours” tests of machismo. Keep in mind, too, that as each inevitably engages in trench warfare, average snaps usually run about 20-25 fewer in Commander-in-Chief battles than other games because of the constant running and few incompletions. Note that Air Force and Navy had just 119 snaps five weeks ago at Falcon Stadium, and while the example is extreme, Florida Atlantic and North Texas featured 167 snaps last weekend. Fewer snaps usually equals fewer chances to score, hence the traditionally-lower Commander-in-Chief scorelines.
Play the Under
11/03 1:21 PM PST — Troy Calhoun's Falcons, down top-two QBs Liam Szarka and Evan Medders due to injury, opted for ex-linebacker and 245-pound bulldozer Kemper Hodges at QB last week vs. UConn, and Hodges responded with a punishing 200 rushing yards in the Falcons' 35-26 win in Colorado Springs. Hodges also started a game and won at Northern Illinois earlier in October, and worth noting that Air Force didn't complete a pass in either of the games Hodges has started! Though Medders (ankle) would likely get the start this week if available, Calhoun will not mind having to stick with Hodges one more week.
| Air Force | 30 / 28.3 | +1.7 | 36 | 37 | -3 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 |
| Army | 38.7 / 36 | +2.7 | 30 | 32 | +1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 1-1 | 1-0 / 2-0 |
| Air Force | 10-31 | Connectic. | -2 | 52.5 | 35-26 | Army | 10-31 | @ Memphis | +6 | 59 | 22-49 |
| | 10-23 | @ Wyoming | -7 | 46.5 | 14-28 | | 10-23 | @ Tulsa | -1 | 53 | 38-35 |
| | 10-17 | UNLV | PK | 48.5 | 41-31 | | 10-17 | Florida A. | -2 | 55.5 | 56-24 |
|
| 11-01-25 | Army | 20 | -1.5 | 15 | 45/193 | 5/9/0/102 | 0/0 |
| Air Force | 17 | 48 | 23 | 50/174 | 13/18/2/161 | 2/1 |
| Air Force |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:6-2 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1Q SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Duquesne | -31.5 | W | 34-0 | UN | 55.5 | | W | 7-0 | OV | | | W | 20-0 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | North Dakota State | 2 | L | 32-38 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | L | 13-28 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Nevada | -4.5 | L | 36-33 | OV | 50.5 | -0.5 | L | 3-10 | OV | 10.5 | -2.5 | L | 10-10 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-03-26 | Navy | -2.5 | W | 14-9 | UN | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 7.5 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | @ No Illinois | -6.5 | W | 28-7 | UN | 48.5 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | UNLV | 0 | W | 41-31 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | OV | 0 | 0 | L | 13-17 | OV | 24 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Wyoming | -7 | L | 14-28 | UN | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 6-21 | OV | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | Connecticut | -2 | W | 35-26 | OV | 52.5 | 0 | W | 14-0 | OV | 9.5 | -0.5 | W | 21-14 | OV | 26 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Army | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-27-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Army |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:3-2 , PSR:2-5 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-2 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Bryant | -37 | W | 59-3 | OV | 51.5 | | W | 21-0 | OV | | | W | 31-3 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | South Florida | -3 | L | 24-28 | OV | 45.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -2.5 | W | 14-7 | UN | 23 |
| 09-25-26 | @ Temple | -3.5 | W | 21-17 | UN | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -2.5 | L | 7-7 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Louisiana Tech | 0 | L | 29-31 | OV | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | 0 | L | 7-14 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Tulane | -5.5 | L | 20-17 | UN | 49 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | W | 7-3 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | Florida Atlantic | -2 | W | 56-24 | OV | 55.5 | -0.5 | L | 14-14 | OV | 10.5 | -0.5 | W | 35-14 | OV | 27 |
| 10-23-26 | @ Tulsa | -1 | W | 38-35 | OV | 53 | 0.5 | W | 10-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 20-14 | OV | 26.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Memphis | 6 | L | 22-49 | OV | 59 | 0.5 | L | 7-14 | OV | 13.5 | 3.5 | L | 14-28 | OV | 30 |
| 11-07-26 | Air Force | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | East Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Rice | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12-12-26 | Navy | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Miami Florida | 27 | 54 | 6.5 | | 5 | 23 | 4-0 / 4-0 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 4-0 / 3-1 | +39 / +20.8 | -35.5 / -18 |
| Notre Dame | 28 | -7.5 | 3(3) | -6.5 | 3 | 33 | 3-0 / 2-1 | 2-1 / 1-2 | 1-2 / 3-0 | +40 / +15.3 | -38 / -19.5 |
Miami famously earned a 27-24 home win over the Irish to kick off the 2025-26 season, which eventually became the result that got the Hurricanes into last year's College Football Playoff and kept Notre Dame out. That was CJ Carr's first college start, and the Irish signal caller has certainly grown since that contest. Notre Dame recovered from the loss to BYU with a grinding 35-13 win over Navy last week. Tuesday's release of the first College Football Playoff rankings created a number of storylines in this contest. First, the No. 1 team (Miami) is a sizable underdog to the No. 11 team (Notre Dame). That's not ideal for anyone. Imagine trying to explain that to a college football novice looking to learn more about the sport. Also, Notre Dame's placement outside the top-10 took away any room for error. Heading into this week, there was at least a healthy discussion surrounding "Can a 10-2 Notre Dame team...?" That's now out the window. The Irish end the season with Boston College, SMU and Syracuse after this game against Miami. Barring complete chaos from other leagues around the country, Notre Dame will not be able to make up enough spots following a potential loss to Miami on Saturday. We've been playing a fool me once, fool me twice game with the Hurricanes' defense over the past few weeks. Miami had a bye four weeks ago, and in that week off, the Hurricanes got four defensive starters off the injury report and onto the field. Somehow, that made Miami's defense significantly worse. The 'Canes have allowed an average of 31.0 points per game to Florida State, Pitt and North Carolina - None of which are world-beaters. The over is 7-1 in Miami's games this season. Four of Notre Dame's last five games have gone over the total. Ultimately, we're going to go back to the same well and hope that the fourth time is the charm for this Miami defense, which should be producing better numbers than it currently is. And if Notre Dame does build a sizable lead, the Hurricanes' passing attack is certainly good enough to sneak in the back door with a late score.
Play Miami
11/05 10:51 AM PST — Hurricanes' star receiver Malachi Toney is expected to undergo ankle surgery on Thursday and will likely miss the next 4-6 weeks, but will hope to return for the College Football Playoff, assuming Miami is involved.
| Miami Florida | 44.3 / 31 | +13.3 | 4 | 23 | -18 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Notre Dame | 39 / 16 | +23 | 3 | 27 | -27.5 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 0-1 | 1-0 / 1-0 |
| Miami Florida | 10-31 | @ North Car. | -13 | 53 | 38-35 | Notre Dame | 10-31 | @ Navy | -31 | 54 | 35-13 |
| | 10-24 | Pittsburg. | -20.5 | 50.5 | 52-23 | | 10-17 | @ BYU | -10.5 | 47.5 | 24-28 |
| | 10-17 | Florida S. | -20.5 | 57 | 43-35 | | 10-10 | Stanford | -40.5 | 55 | 58-7 |
|
| 08-31-25 | Notre Dame | 24 | -3 | 18 | 28/93 | 19/30/1/221 | 2/1 |
| Miami Florida | 27 | 50.5 | 20 | 37/127 | 20/31/0/205 | 1/0 |
| Miami Florida |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:8-0 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:7-1-0 | 1Q SUR:7-0 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:4-4-0 | 1H SUR:7-0 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:6-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ Stanford | -24.5 | W | 45-6 | OV | 46.5 | -6.5 | W | 14-3 | OV | 10.5 | -14 | W | 28-6 | OV | 24.5 |
| 09-10-26 | Florida A&M | -59.5 | W | 77-7 | OV | 66.5 | -16.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 17.5 | -36.5 | W | 49-0 | OV | 38.5 |
| 09-18-26 | @ Wake Forest | -20 | L | 33-20 | UN | 55.5 | -6.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 13.5 | -11 | W | 24-7 | OV | 29.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Central Michigan | -41 | W | 52-3 | OV | 52 | -10.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -24 | W | 35-3 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Clemson | -14 | W | 41-13 | OV | 49 | -3.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 10.5 | -7.5 | W | 17-6 | UN | 24.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Florida State | -20.5 | L | 43-35 | OV | 57 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -11.5 | L | 14-14 | UN | 29.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Pittsburgh U | -20.5 | W | 52-23 | OV | 50.5 | -5.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 10.5 | -11 | W | 31-7 | OV | 27 |
| 10-31-26 | @ North Carolina | -13 | L | 38-35 | OV | 53 | -3.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 10.5 | -7 | L | 17-14 | OV | 27 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Notre Dame |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:7-1 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:7-1 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1H SUR:7-1 , PSR:3-5 , O/U:5-3-0 |
| 09-06-26 | Wisconsin | -21.5 | W | 41-13 | OV | 46 | -6.5 | W | 10-3 | OV | 9.5 | -13.5 | L | 13-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Rice | -44.5 | W | 52-0 | UN | 54.5 | -13.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14 | -26.5 | W | 42-0 | OV | 31 |
| 09-19-26 | Michigan State | -29 | L | 27-10 | UN | 51.5 | -7 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -17.5 | L | 17-10 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Purdue | -27 | W | 49-10 | OV | 57 | -6.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13.5 | -16.5 | W | 35-0 | OV | 31 |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Carolina | -21 | L | 37-26 | OV | 46.5 | -5.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 10.5 | -11 | L | 21-14 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Stanford | -40.5 | W | 58-7 | OV | 55 | -7.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 13.5 | -23.5 | W | 37-0 | OV | 31 |
| 10-17-26 | @ BYU | -10.5 | L | 24-28 | OV | 47.5 | -2.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 10-21 | OV | 23.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Navy | -31 | L | 35-13 | UN | 54 | -7.5 | L | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | -18.5 | L | 14-13 | UN | 30.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Miami Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Fresno State | 17 | 0 | 30 | -3.5 | 29 | 28 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 4-0 / 2-2 | 4-0 / 1-3 | +17.3 / -1.5 | -3.5 / +3.5 |
| Utah State | 20 | 44.5 | 36.5(3) | | 39 | 48 | 3-1 / 0-4 | 2-2 / 3-1 | 0-4 / 1-3 | +4.3 / -14.3 | -8 / +22 |
Reminding everyone recently about some of the tricks of the trade he once learned as an assistant under the sage Rocky Long, Utah State head coach Bronco Mendenhall has authored some defensive masterpieces, especially the past two weeks vs. the likes of potent Texas State and Colorado State attacks that had been scoring points hand-over-fist all season. Not against Utah State, however, as Mendenhall closed the escape routes for mobile QBs Brad Jackson (Bobcats–only 15 rushing yards) and Hauss Hejny (Rams–minus 5 rushing yards) while holding both foes well beneath their season scoring averages, and reviving the Aggies’ flickering bowl hopes in last week’s 31-14 thumping of CSU. Bronco doesn’t have to worry about Jackson and Hejny-sort-of-mobility in the opposing pilot this week as Fresno’s Jayden Mandal, while hardly immobile, isn’t quite as likely to take off and run, though the Bulldogs present another set of concerns after slowing down the runaway Oregon State offense last Saturday in the rainy Central Valley. The Aggies also aren’t the Beavers, in fact Utah State was the lowest-scoring team in the country before facing CSU’s non-defense a a week ago, though Mendenhall’s switch in the cockpit to early-season starter and BYU transfer QB McCae Hillstead did provide a spark to an offense that was running on low wattage with Grady Brosterhous at the controls, with Hillstead a highly-efficient 17-of-22 thru the air against CSU while adding another 79 rushing yards. With regional sources expecting Hillstead to stay in the lineup, perhaps the Aggies are ready to make a late-season move, and remember that Mendenhall did outmaneuver Bulldog counterpart Matt Entz in a 28-17 win at the Dog House late last season.
Play the Under
11/03 1:31 PM PST — The Aggies made a QB switch last week vs. Colorado State, as Bronco Mendenhall benched Grady Brosterhous, who had been in the starting lineup since mid-September, and returned to opening-game starter and ex-BYU McCae Hillstead, who completed 17 of 22 passes and rushed for 79 yards, both passing and running for a TD, in an uplifting 31-14 win over the Rams. Hillstead is expected to remain in the Aggies lineup moving forward.
| Fresno State | 30.7 / 28.7 | +2 | 28 | 30 | +3 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Utah State | 21.7 / 16.7 | +5 | 39 | 39 | +0.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 0-2 / 0-1 |
| Fresno State | 10-31 | Oregon St. | +6 | 57 | 38-22 | Utah State | 10-31 | Colorado . | -9.5 | 59 | 31-14 |
| | 10-17 | @ San Diego. | -6.5 | 46.5 | 23-26 | | 10-24 | @ Texas Sta. | +14.5 | 59 | 17-20 |
| | 10-10 | Boise Sta. | +9 | 48.5 | 31-38 | | 10-09 | Washingto. | -4 | 44 | 17-16 |
|
| 11-22-25 | Utah State | 28 | 50.5 | 27 | 47/227 | 18/32/1/176 | 2/1 |
| Fresno State | 17 | -2 | 12 | 27/178 | 23/33/1/187 | 0/0 |
| Fresno State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:5-3-0 | 1Q SUR:2-5 , PSR:2-5-1 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1H SUR:3-4 , PSR:3-4-1 , O/U:6-2-0 |
| 09-04-26 | @ USC | 22.5 | L | 0-39 | UN | 51.5 | 7 | PK | 0-7 | UN | 10.5 | 13.5 | L | 0-30 | OV | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | Sacramento State | -17.5 | W | 49-3 | OV | 43.5 | -6.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 9.5 | -10.5 | W | 32-0 | OV | 23.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ San Jose State | -4 | W | 26-10 | UN | 47.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | PK | 6-3 | UN | 24 |
| 09-26-26 | Rice | -12 | W | 38-24 | OV | 43 | -3.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | -6.5 | L | 14-17 | OV | 22.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Washington State | 2 | W | 26-6 | UN | 45 | -0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 6-6 | UN | 22.5 |
| 10-10-26 | Boise State | 9 | W | 31-38 | OV | 48.5 | 0.5 | L | 13-15 | OV | 9.5 | 4.5 | L | 20-25 | OV | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ San Diego State | -6.5 | L | 23-26 | OV | 46.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-10 | OV | 9.5 | -3.5 | L | 10-16 | OV | 23 |
| 10-31-26 | Oregon State | 6 | W | 38-22 | OV | 57 | 0.5 | W | 7-3 | UN | 13.5 | 3.5 | W | 21-9 | OV | 28.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Colorado State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Utah State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:3-5 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:1-7-0 | 1Q SUR:2-4 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 | 1H SUR:2-6 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:1-6-0 |
| 09-05-26 | Idaho State | -15.5 | L | 17-29 | UN | 58.5 | | W | 7-6 | OV | | | L | 10-16 | OV | |
| 09-12-26 | @ Washington U | 28 | W | 14-16 | UN | 55.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 13.5 | 17 | W | 7-10 | UN | 29.5 |
| 09-19-26 | @ Utah | 26.5 | L | 0-33 | UN | 55.5 | 6.5 | L | 0-16 | OV | 13.5 | 15.5 | L | 0-26 | UN | 30 |
| 09-26-26 | Troy | -3 | W | 21-10 | UN | 48 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 9.5 | -1.5 | L | 7-10 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Boise State | 19.5 | W | 18-37 | OV | 51 | 6.5 | L | 0-14 | OV | 12.5 | 11 | L | 10-28 | OV | 27 |
| 10-09-26 | Washington State | -4 | L | 17-16 | UN | 44 | -0.5 | L | 0-6 | UN | 9.5 | -3 | L | 3-16 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-24-26 | @ Texas State | 14.5 | W | 17-20 | UN | 59 | 4.5 | W | 6-7 | UN | 13.5 | 8.5 | W | 9-7 | UN | 30 |
| 10-31-26 | Colorado State | -9.5 | W | 31-14 | UN | 59 | -1.5 | W | 10-0 | UN | 13.5 | -5.5 | W | 17-0 | UN | 30.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Texas State | 35 | 72.5 | 25 | -2.5 | 30 | 20 | 4-1 / 0-3 | 3-2 / 1-2 | 3-2 / 3-0 | +20.8 / -18.3 | -13 / +10 |
| Oregon State | 46 | -4 | 29.5(2) | | 31 | 29 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 3-1 / 3-1 | 4-0 / 3-1 | +23.5 / +6.8 | -6.5 / -1 |
We admit this matchup has lost some of its potential luster after both went down to defeat last week, as recuperative powers will now be tested for each. In the case of Texas State head coach GJ Kinne, however, we suggest he might enlist Dr Phil for some possible psychological support after the gut-wrenching manner the decision at Boise State was pulled from the Bobcats, who erased a 28-3 deficit in the third quarter with a breathless 36-straight points, only to see the host Broncos rally behind backup QB Max Cutforth in a back-and-forth fourth quarter that ended up 46-45 in Boise’s favor. In that regard, perhaps it’s better for the Beavers to have been whipped soundly at Fresno, which has the sort of defense that can jam the gearbox on many offenses. Even so, Oregon State gunslinger and Mercer transfer QB Braden Atkinson passed for 373 yards in defeat, and still needs the nation in passing yards (2,977) and passing TDs (25), though last weekend he couldn’t locate homerun frosh wideout Jesse Legree downfield, held to a season-low 70 yards worth of receptions (his first game under 100 receiving yards, by the way) at the Dog House. While the Bobcats have plenty of offense (38.1 ppg) and a dangerous dual-threat QB in Brad Jackson (2,369 all-purpose yards and responsible for 24 TDs), they also have had a tendency to self-destruct, with a -5 turnover margin across earlier losses to UTSA and San Diego State, and the defense was zinged for over 600 yards by North Texas in an early-season shootout (won by Texas State) at San Marcos. Bottom line? Most Pac-12 insiders don’t suspect the Bobcats provide the same sort of matchup issues for the avant-garde Beavers offense as Fresno did last week, though more back-and-forth might be expected. Just be prepared to stay up late for this expected shootout on the CW that might last past midnight in Corvallis!
Play the Over
| Texas State | 43.7 / 30 | +13.7 | 32 | 35 | -6.5 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 1-0 |
| Oregon State | 45.3 / 27.3 | +18 | 28 | 35 | -13 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 2-0 / 1-0 |
| Texas State | 10-31 | @ Boise Sta. | +10 | 63.5 | 45-46 | Oregon State | 10-31 | @ Fresno St. | -6 | 57 | 22-38 |
| | 10-24 | Utah State | -14.5 | 59 | 20-17 | | 10-17 | Washingto. | -19 | 52 | 48-30 |
| | 10-15 | Colorado . | -15.5 | 69.5 | 66-27 | | 10-10 | San Diego. | -14.5 | 52.5 | 66-14 |
| Texas State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:4-4 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:6-2-0 | 1Q SUR:5-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:2-4-1 | 1H SUR:4-3 , PSR:3-4 , O/U:3-4-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Texas | 29.5 | L | 7-59 | OV | 61.5 | 7.5 | L | 0-14 | P | 14 | 17.5 | L | 7-28 | OV | 33 |
| 09-12-26 | Tex San Antonio | -1.5 | L | 26-31 | UN | 65.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 14 | -0.5 | W | 17-7 | UN | 31.5 |
| 09-19-26 | North Texas | -3 | W | 49-35 | OV | 62.5 | -0.5 | W | 21-7 | OV | 13.5 | -2 | L | 28-28 | OV | 31.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Incarnate Word | -30 | W | 63-10 | OV | 66 | | W | 28-7 | OV | | | W | 42-10 | OV | |
| 10-03-26 | @ San Diego State | -10 | L | 29-31 | OV | 57.5 | -2.5 | W | 10-3 | UN | 13.5 | -6.5 | W | 17-3 | UN | 29 |
| 10-15-26 | Colorado State | -15.5 | W | 66-27 | OV | 69.5 | -6.5 | W | 21-0 | OV | 14.5 | -10 | W | 45-21 | OV | 36.5 |
| 10-24-26 | Utah State | -14.5 | L | 20-17 | UN | 59 | -4.5 | L | 7-6 | UN | 13.5 | -8.5 | L | 7-9 | UN | 30 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Boise State | 10 | W | 45-46 | OV | 63.5 | 2.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 13.5 | 6 | L | 3-28 | UN | 32.5 |
| 11-07-26 | @ Oregon State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Washington State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Oregon State |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:6-2 , O/U:7-1-0 | 1Q SUR:5-2 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:5-2-0 | 1H SUR:5-3 , PSR:6-1 , O/U:4-3-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Houston U | 21 | W | 20-33 | OV | 50.5 | 6.5 | W | 7-9 | OV | 10.5 | 12.5 | W | 7-19 | UN | 27 |
| 09-12-26 | Texas Tech | 26 | W | 24-35 | OV | 52.5 | 7 | W | 0-0 | UN | 12.5 | 14.5 | W | 7-14 | UN | 28 |
| 09-19-26 | Montana | -17.5 | W | 52-17 | OV | 56.5 | | W | 14-0 | OV | | | W | 35-3 | OV | |
| 09-26-26 | @ UTEP | -11 | W | 33-7 | UN | 56 | -2.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -6.5 | W | 20-0 | UN | 28.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ Colorado State | -7 | W | 56-26 | OV | 61 | -0.5 | W | 14-7 | OV | 13.5 | -4 | W | 35-14 | OV | 30.5 |
| 10-10-26 | San Diego State | -14.5 | W | 66-14 | OV | 52.5 | -3.5 | W | 14-0 | OV | 12.5 | -8.5 | W | 38-7 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-17-26 | Washington State | -19 | L | 48-30 | OV | 52 | -6.5 | W | 17-0 | OV | 12.5 | -10.5 | W | 27-10 | OV | 27.5 |
| 10-31-26 | @ Fresno State | -6 | L | 22-38 | OV | 57 | -0.5 | L | 3-7 | UN | 13.5 | -3.5 | L | 9-21 | OV | 28.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Texas State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ Boise State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Key Release | | Updated: 11/03 10:10 pm |
| Wyoming | 24 | 50.5 | 38 | | 42 | 35 | 4-0 / 1-3 | 3-1 / 1-3 | 1-3 / 1-3 | +14.3 / -15.3 | -5.5 / +5.5 |
| UNLV | 23 | -3 | 32(1) | -7 | 29 | 53 | 3-1 / 2-2 | 2-2 / 2-2 | 1-3 / 1-3 | +3.8 / -1.3 | -6 / -4.5 |
Shane Beamer at South Carolina isn’t the only coach to have pulled himself off of the hot seat in recent weeks. Check out what’s been happening at Wyoming, where not long ago the anti-Jay Sawvel forces were getting ready to line up ads like the midterm elections before the Cowboys began to find some footing and put themselves on course for bowl eligibility. It’s not quite like it was during the Josh Allen days in Laramie, as it took a while for the William & Mary connection of QB Tyler Hughes and OC Christian Taylor to get in gear like they had been last year in the SoCon, but Hughes is now looking like the dynamite dual-threat he was for the Tribe after rushing for a whopping 421 yards and 5 TDs across the past three games, all Wyoming wins. He’s also completing 70-percent of his well-spaced passes in the uptick, while Sawvel’s defense is making mentor Craig Bohl proud after stuffing a variety of recent Mountain West foes while allowing just 20 ppg on the season, right about where the Cowboys were a year ago. This robust stop unit might be a good elixir against Rebel QB Jackson Arnold, who has found some footing as Dan Mullen’s latest QB project (a list that historically includes Tim Tebow, Dak Prescott, Kyle Trask and others) and whose dual-threat capabilities are proving a nice complement to slashing RB Jai’Den Thomas (657 rushing yards), on course for another 1,000-yard season. Mountain West sources, however, are asking some questions about an inconsistent Rebel defense that has gone AWOL a few times this season and inexplicably allowed nearly 500 yards last week to one of the nation’s most punchless attacks (Northern Illinois). An added prize here is that the winner becomes the frontrunner to face loop leader New Mexico in the Mountain West title game, while noting that both also have regular-season matchups vs. the Lobos later in November. Indeed, the fun is just starting in the Mountain West!
Play Wyoming
| Wyoming | 28.3 / 16.7 | +11.7 | 46 | 42 | +1 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 2-0 / 1-0 | 1-1 / 0-1 |
| UNLV | 25 / 24 | +1 | 29 | 39 | -6 | 2-0 / 0-1 | 1-1 / 0-1 | 0-2 / 1-0 |
| Wyoming | 10-23 | Air Force | +7 | 46.5 | 28-14 | UNLV | 10-31 | No Illino. | -21.5 | 56 | 31-24 |
| | 10-17 | No Illino. | -7.5 | 43 | 41-23 | | 10-17 | @ Air Force | PK | 48.5 | 31-41 |
| | 10-09 | @ San Jose . | +4 | 42.5 | 16-13 | | 10-10 | North Dak. | +3 | 48 | 13-7 |
|
| 10-04-25 | UNLV | 31 | -4.5 | 15 | 39/153 | 11/20/0/102 | 2/1 |
| Wyoming | 17 | 51 | 21 | 26/102 | 25/46/1/254 | 2/2 |
| Wyoming |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:3-3 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 | 1H SUR:3-5 , PSR:4-3 , O/U:2-5-0 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Colorado State | 2.5 | L | 13-35 | OV | 46 | 0.5 | L | 3-7 | OV | 9 | 0.5 | L | 6-14 | UN | 23 |
| 09-12-26 | Northern Colorado | -23.5 | L | 21-13 | UN | 44.5 | | 0-0 | P | | | L | 7-10 | OV | |
| 09-19-26 | @ Central Michigan | -1.5 | L | 10-24 | UN | 40 | 0 | L | 0-3 | UN | 7.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-17 | UN | 19.5 |
| 09-26-26 | Hawaii | 2 | W | 27-10 | UN | 44 | 0.5 | W | 3-3 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 13-3 | UN | 21.5 |
| 10-03-26 | @ North Dakota State | 17 | L | 0-28 | UN | 44 | 4.5 | L | 0-7 | UN | 9.5 | 10 | L | 0-17 | UN | 23.5 |
| 10-09-26 | @ San Jose State | 4 | W | 16-13 | UN | 42.5 | 0.5 | W | 3-0 | UN | 7.5 | 3 | W | 6-7 | UN | 21 |
| 10-17-26 | No Illinois | -7.5 | W | 41-23 | OV | 43 | -0.5 | W | 10-0 | OV | 7.5 | -4 | W | 20-6 | OV | 20.5 |
| 10-23-26 | Air Force | 7 | W | 28-14 | UN | 46.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 3.5 | W | 21-6 | OV | 23 |
| 11-07-26 | @ UNLV | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ UTEP | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-20-26 | New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Connecticut | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UNLV |
|---|
| | GAME SUR:5-3 , PSR:4-4 , O/U:2-6-0 | 1Q SUR:2-3 , PSR:2-6 , O/U:4-3-1 | 1H SUR:6-1 , PSR:5-3 , O/U:3-5-0 |
| 08-29-26 | Memphis | -4.5 | L | 21-27 | UN | 55.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-0 | UN | 13 | -3 | W | 14-7 | UN | 28 |
| 09-05-26 | @ Hawaii | -1.5 | W | 21-6 | UN | 55 | -0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 13 | -0.5 | W | 14-3 | UN | 27.5 |
| 09-12-26 | @ North Texas | -3 | L | 6-44 | UN | 58.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-13 | P | 13 | -1.5 | L | 3-20 | UN | 28.5 |
| 09-26-26 | @ Akron | -13 | W | 38-10 | UN | 53 | -3.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | -7 | L | 14-10 | UN | 26.5 |
| 10-03-26 | California | 0 | W | 39-31 | OV | 51.5 | -0.5 | L | 7-7 | OV | 10.5 | 0 | W | 24-7 | OV | 26 |
| 10-10-26 | North Dakota State | 3 | W | 13-7 | UN | 48 | 0.5 | W | 7-0 | UN | 9.5 | 0.5 | W | 7-7 | UN | 24 |
| 10-17-26 | @ Air Force | 0 | L | 31-41 | OV | 48.5 | -0.5 | L | 0-3 | OV | 0 | 0 | W | 17-13 | OV | 24 |
| 10-31-26 | No Illinois | -21.5 | L | 31-24 | UN | 56 | -6.5 | L | 10-14 | OV | 13.5 | -13.5 | L | 24-17 | OV | 28.5 |
| 11-07-26 | Wyoming | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-14-26 | @ New Mexico | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-21-26 | @ San Jose State | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11-28-26 | Nevada | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| KEY |
| Score | The predicted score for an event |
| PR | The team's Power Rating |
| GS Line | The GoldSheet line, calculated using each team's Power Rating. |
| Avg. PR | The average Power Rating of a team over the course of the season. |
| Avg. OPR | The average of a team's opponent Power Rating on the day that they played. |
| SUR (H/A) | The team's straight-up-record, both at home and on the road. |
| ATS (H/A) | The team's record against-the-spread. |
| O/U (H/A) | The team's over-under record. |
| Pts. Diff. (H/A) | The team's +/- point differential. |
| Avg. Ln. (H/A) | The average line the team has had over the course of the season. |
| PF/PA | The average points a team has scored and allowed. |
| FD | The total number of first downs. |
| RA/RY | The number of rushing attempts and yards. |
| PC/PA/I/PY | The number of passing completions, attempts, interceptions and yards. |
| RA/RY | The number of fumbles and fumbles lost. |
COPYRIGHT 2026 © THE GOLD SHEET
ALL RIGHT RESERVED.